Efficient ways to reduce gun violence, according to expert l ABCNL
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
- ABC News’ Linsey Davis spoke with Executive Director of the Gun Violence Archive Mark Bryant on the recent bipartisan gun safety bill and what it means in terms of the latest string of mass shootings.
ABC News Live Prime, Weekdays at 7EST & 9EST
WATCH the ABC News Live Stream Here: • LIVE: Latest News Head...
SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Watch More on abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK / abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: / abc
#ABCNLPrime #gunviolence #guncontrol #shooting
If you went after the criminals with stiffer penalties instead of the law abiding citizens you would see a decrease in gun violence.
And STOP glorifying the criminals.
Boyfriend loophole 😒🤔 sounds pretty sexist
Expert = Someone who will confirm our biases.
Biases on what? Their is no bias when it comes to gun violence it happens all the time. Doing nothing but catering to gun enthusiasts has not worked so far so we need to do something.
@@river13 When have we ever "done nothing but cater to gun enthusiasts"
You guys have been getting increasing gun regulation passed for decades and the places that ban guns are where people are being shot
@@phoenixblanco3892 You telling me Texas has tough gun laws? You must be after the Uvalde shooting.
@@phoenixblanco3892 In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed an assault-weapons ban, which outlawed the AR-15 and other similar semiautomatic rifles.
Mass shootings were down in the decade that followed, compared to the decade before (1984-94) and the one after (2004-14), but they did not end entirely. The ban expired in 2004. In raw numbers, they found that mass shooting deaths fell during the years of the ban, and rose afterwards. Deaths more than tripled in the decade after the ban ended. The death toll from mass shootings went from an average of 4.8 per year during the ban years to an average of 23.8 per year in the decade afterwards.
@@river13 Does one exception define the rule
maybe just focus on the violence in general and not on the tool
In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed an assault-weapons ban, which outlawed the AR-15 and other similar semiautomatic rifles.
Mass shootings were down in the decade that followed, compared to the decade before (1984-94) and the one after (2004-14), but they did not end entirely. The ban expired in 2004. In raw numbers, they found that mass shooting deaths fell during the years of the ban, and rose afterwards. Deaths more than tripled in the decade after the ban ended. The death toll from mass shootings went from an average of 4.8 per year during the ban years to an average of 23.8 per year in the decade afterwards.
@@k333rl Semi-automatic rifles in the AR-15 style have been the weapon of choice in numerous deadly mass shootings. Boulder: AR-15
Orlando: AR-15
Parkland: AR-15
Las Vegas: AR-15
Aurora, CO: AR-15
Sandy Hook: AR-15
Waffle House: AR-15
San Bernardino: AR-15
Midland/Odessa: AR-15
Poway synagogue: AR-15
Sutherland Springs: AR-15
Tree of Life Synagogue: AR-15 The Brady Bill is still in effect. If it was the Brady Bill that made mass shootings go down they would not have risen when the AR bill ended.
@@river13 yes they have been buy they still only account for a tiny % of all shootings. It's like back in the 90s when the number one stolen car was the Toyota corolla. It's not because it was an awesome car but because it was the most sold car. When you have the most popular item on the market then most other stats will follow that same trend. Only in the case of the AR that still isn't true. You cant deny the stats. Why focus on the AR when there is the mini 14? It's the same caliber and functions almost identical. Or maybe the m1a much larger round still the same function. The only real difference is that they aren't black and super scary looking. You know that this new awb will also be targeting .22 rifles like the 10/22 as well as pistols? When was the last time a 10/22 was used in a shooting? The people that are making and pushing these bills have zero knowledge on the subject and are taking features that they think are dangerous, like pistol grips, and listing them to be banned. If you know anything about firearms, what makes a pistol grip more dangerous? Why does the weight of a pistol matter? Why does a threaded barrel matter? All three of these features will be banned yet they don't make a firearm any more or less dangerous. Again, this isn't about safety. It's about asserting dominance, control, and their perceived power.
@@k333rl So just let the mass shootings to continue and do nothing? Funny how if the gun does not matter it sure made the Uvalde police crap their pants. You ignored the fact I stated about the Brady Bill, so the AR ban helped like it or not. Not about safety? Tell that to the parents of all the children killed in mass shootings their are a crap load of them. If you feel none of things being addressed will not help then we need to go stricter. Or we can continue on the path of doing nothing and let people die, who gives a crap long as people can have any gun they want as many as they want even if they are nuttier than a fruitcake, freedom! Arm those teachers that you call groomers that should have no bad consequences at all. Screw the children let them adapt and learn to hide better.
@@river13 and after reading over a dozen articles on the awb it's clear that the type of weapon used made no real difference and that it mostly came down to magazine size.
Funny on this double talk, so a good guy with a gun CAN"T stop a shooter but if the shooter has 10 round magazines then the public CAN stop the shooter during the reload?
America has a terrible gun problem and Americans do NOT have the courage to face it. Otherwise America is a great country.
“More than 220 shot and killed in U.S. gun violence over July 4 holiday weekend.”-July 5, 2022, CBS News. *Is there any hope that such violence will end?* 🍕🍕🍕
@0:45 imagine if you add Chicago 🤡
What makes someone an expert on gun violence?
The same way people become experts in other areas, they study gun violence and in America we have plenty of gun violence to study.
Education?
@@river13 yet with all the research and studies we still end up with people who have no idea what they are talking about.
@Orbital Cooker Where would that be?
@@k333rl I know you know more than all.
Since the lawmakers and their families are well-protected and are not in any danger nothing will be done, nothing will change, and the blood bath will continue...
Licenses and extremely high insurance requirements for all gun owners
Patently illegal.
And what happens when they tell you no. Prohibition went away because the cops and the average citizen didn't comply. You think gun owners will just pay a lot of money to make you feel safer.
Just like a democrat. Insurance for gun owners. GTFO!
How about insurance for your husband sleeping with other women?
so poor people don't get to have the best tool available for their protection? the poor are who need weapons the most yet you want to price them out of a fundamental right.
Republicans and their bandaid solutions
Hahaha that's hilarious.
a well done video with no dislikes. everyone loves it!
Lul settle down there it's only 29 people so her and everyone behind the camera
Expert is just another word meaning toilet paper.
again with the mental health these tweens are not mentally troubled they want to do it and they loved it they enjoyed the violance because they loved so much 😒
everyone wants to blame it on the guns or 'mental health' instead of that actual problem of parents not raising proper functioning humans.
The schools get $$ for each child put on meds. Big pharma caused this with perverse incentives.
As one of the great founding fathers said;
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Jefferson's "Commonplace Book,"
If this is an isolated truth, please explain why the US has drastically more gun deaths than any other first world nation combined.
And what was the magazine capacity then?
@@matthewtonos9269stupid comment
@matthewtonos9269 that's a moot argument because, yes, each man in the example would be able to fire 1 round in like 20 seconds but it's literally a 1to1 thing. Now criminals can fire 21 rounds in 8 seconds. So can law abiding civilians. What's your point?
Background checks were illegal and Unconstitutional from the start.
Why would background checks matter if they did not work in many examples anyway? Why would enhanced background checks for under 21 be any better?
Cruz is right. My school had the same idea. Many kids caught with not just guns but kni es, drugs & other things that don't belong in school. Jimmy is an entertainer. People need to stop with the nonsense. I am now an armed guard protecting people, kids.I ha e made a difference.if Iwas unarmed, yes, many incidence could've ended differently. So this anti gun is not the answer. When it co.es to the reality where criminals are armed, should I & other people be victims?