One of my favourite jokes is from british comedian Tim Vine. He says: "I had dinner with chess champion Gary Kasparov the other night. We had a checkered tablecloth; It took him 3 hours to pass the salt"
The whole context of the interview is that Garry is above Magnus, "are you afraid to disappoint him" and all of that. Not surprised if that made Magnus uncomfortable.
@@dominusdone5023 Carlsen himself has stated that the meetings were very informal and there was very little serious 'training' going on. Carlsen's actual coaches and seconds deserve far more recognition than Gary.
In recent years, I've heard Carlsen compliment Anand more than any other player.... and Magnus does NOT do that often. So your usage of the word "enemy" may be off a bit. Competitor perhaps?
@@seife41 Where do I know? 😃 I know in the south east united states at the moment and In fact, I currently Know a great deal in Florida. Furthermore, in my youth, I've known across Parts of Canada and Tamaulipas. Where do YOU know? 😂
Seriously. Magnus was ranked #4 with an overly aggressive streak. Within months of working with Kasparov, he evolved into the clear #1 with a universal style.
@@Zveruidfly Magnus jumped from #4 to #1 in the months that Kasparov began mentoring him. Either that's an incredible coincidence, or Kasparov tapped into some hidden talent by shoring up the remaining weaknesses in Magnus' game.
@@jasonlee7928 not sure where you got the "10x" multiplier from. Kasparov dominated the world for roughly 25 years. we have yet to see if Carlsen's dominance will last as long.
A great champion doesn't become necessarily a great trainer. Magnus talked about the period that Kasparov trained him: one or two years, I think, and they saw some openings; he said also that one Kasparov's main contributions was the style of play and psychology of his big rivals, Krammik, Vishy, Topalov, etc. Their strengths and weaknesses in competition. Magnus was amazed with Garry's knowledge at this level. But that was it! Garry didn't create anyone. Their styles and work habits were the opposite. Besides, their personal relationship became tense over the years. Nakamura, who worked with Garry also, complained about his iron discipline and unbreakable ambition in the training process. Naka didn't like that Soviet discipline, neither did Magnus. Garry helped Magnus in a particular period of his life. Nothing more. Stop saying that he created a champion. That is very far from the truth
The main reason chess isn't as popular to watch as football (the real football where you kick the ball) or whatever is that it's incredibly difficult to understand what's even going on. How many people actually understand why a move is good during a classical tournament?
Almost all of the great chess players need to start at 6 to 8 years old, and you usually need good parents (educated parents, as well). The Pogar sisters are basically what chess is all about. It will never be played by the masses.
Great interview, thank you!! Love these little snippets of insight into the making of a champion !!! One thing I picked up one beside Magnus' raw sheer talent ... he made the decision and declaration for all to hear to be number 1 ... and, not only that, to be number 1 for many years!! Well, Magnus ... stating what you were about to do was no accident !!! Articulating goals are part of the journey to success.
@@Mach1Airspace No. He'll be an Ivanchuk, Grischuk, Nakamura, Radjabov, or maybe even an Aronian, but not like Karpov, Fischer, Kasparov, Carlsen, Anand, etc. He doesnt have the temperament, discipline, or aptitude. To be the best, you have to have the best trainers, environment, etc, but most importantly, the aptitude and drive. Firouzja doesnt have either. People thought the same of Gata Kamsky. He (Kamsky) had a bang start and he fizzled out.
@@staryoke Like I said: "when he matures". And BTW, he looked damn disciplined saving a draw out of Giri's jaws of defeat today in a 6 hour brawl during the 2nd to last round of TATA Steel, so try not to yap too much about who's got the temperament and who's going to fizzle. Give the 17 yr old some credit and cut him some slack. Today he was a monster and is the toast of the chess world proving your comment all wrong. M1 out.
Alireza esipenko nihal sarin and the older dudes like fabi , ding , nepo have a chance of beating the world champ. but firo is the best bet to beat magnus and take the throne
Dubov has the capacity, in my opinion, but he reminds me in some ways of Fischer where he refuses to compromise his desire to just have fun and enjoy his way of playing.
@@pedrochalaco1 as much as I'm rooting for Duda (who's my compatriot), he's inconsistent, and not that great with opening preparation (by elite standards). I think he tends to rely on his talent. it may be enough for staying close to the top, but not necessarily sufficient to reach for the crown. I wouldn't bet we'll get to see a Polish world chess championship any time soon.
Botvinik trained Kasparov and Kasparov trained Carlsen. I hope Carlsen continues the tradition and finds a young talent and takes him under his wing. I can only imagine the kind of player she or he would be. But to be honest I'm not so sure if Carlsens personality is the one needed to be that generous and patient.
Kasparov was a pretty emotional guy during his time wasn't he? I don't think anyone would have thought of him as a trainer back then but I might be wrong
@@jomjom75 no. after a long thinking while he was bored from waiting eventually Kasparov gave up and left the match unfinished. I was surprised whan I watched this video. apparently their friendship happened after that. you can even see in Carlsen's face he didn't appreciate his comment
@@kinga4796 IC. Carlsen beat Karpov when he was 13, and Karpov reacted with respect. Kasparov played a draw against Carlsen around the same time, and Kasparov left without giving the young Carlsen a compliment. Kasparov is a bad loser.
Magnus is the greatest chess player of all time . Kasparov has nothing to do here . He is just trying to get some credit . .Kasparov is a legend in chess no doubt. / However his behavior is misdemeanor. He went and even trolled publicly that first time worlds best players is not playing in WC( vishy / galfrand). He Was purely jealous about vishy winning 4th WC.This cocky guy even supported vishy to dethrone kramnik who crushed him first time ever in WC. Then later he trained magnus against vishy .. sick politics !!
In reality - Magnus turned Gary down - he did not want to train with him - this i heard in an interview with Magnus' father - who did not intervene - he let Magnus make his own decisions
2:01 "I have the feeling I can become number 1 for many years. 2023: Number 1 in the world, still after many years. The man can look into future! He should become a professional, wouldn't you agree?
Oh wow, history is showing that Kasparov was right. Since a Western champion has come along streaming, and the promotion of chess has never been bigger.
Magnus is the best ever. I find it hard to imagine anyone comes close to him in the next fifty years. P.S. The similarity between English and Norwegian is just hilarious!
Its easy to imagine tho because kasparov did say in an interview that new players are always better than the older generation because of the growing knowledge within chess
Kasparov, being an egomaniac, would love to take credit for Magnus' success, claiming that he "created" him. Magnus clearly is not so amused by that idea. And rightfully so, he has a very different style than Kasparov, so the lessons might have been useful, but that was not the key element in his chess education. I would imagine that Magnus regrets having worked with Gary nowadays for all these reasons.
years ago when I saw vishi play Magnus and and lose against him I knew he would be champion.now,I have seen a lot of GM's.beat Carlson but I don't get that feeling from any of them although I believe Rajabov,Alireza,and ding liren are the only ones that can take the title away from Carlson one day.
So many dumb people saying Kasparov wanted to extend his legacy. Dude nobody cares about his contribution to Magnus' play. He's the greatest of all time in chess. You don't need more legacy.
Kasparov is the Madonna of chess. Madonna was aging , being overshadowed by younger newer talent even becoming irrelevant yet she simply traded on her past and got involved with these new talents thus keeping her relevant . It is somewhat parasitic. Kasparov has a huge ego and could not stand to have posterity say he was not involved in the development of the chess monster that is MAGNUS. OF COURSE IN TIME HE WILL TAKE CREDIT FOR THE MAGNUS'S SUCCESS.
You seem to know a lot without backing it up with any evidence and I'm not sure why you seem to have such a negative view on his motives. I don't see any reason to disbelieve the reasons Kasparov stated in the video. Whether he is THE best is a matter of opinion, but it's undeniable he is ONE of the best and as such, he has nothing more to prove. He received lots of support and coaching when he was in Magnus's position and he is giving something back. I think Kasparov is a pretty top bloke personally.
One of my favourite jokes is from british comedian Tim Vine. He says:
"I had dinner with chess champion Gary Kasparov the other night. We had a checkered tablecloth;
It took him 3 hours to pass the salt"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
LOL
Yikes
Magnus looks uncomfortable, almost like Garry tried to kill him before the interview but it didn't work and they had to go anyways lol
Man! He was a teenager.
Besides he was socially awkward a bit in interviews for some time back in the days.
that's very specific, are you ok?
The whole context of the interview is that Garry is above Magnus, "are you afraid to disappoint him" and all of that. Not surprised if that made Magnus uncomfortable.
After the interview Gary says " Ok, now where was I..." then lunges at Magnus.
Kasparov: "I AM STILL THE BOSS"
Magnus: "Ok, I zip my lips"
Kasparov had a big role in Magnus taking the crown from Vishy. Enemy of enemy is a friend.
Very good point!!
@@dominusdone5023 Carlsen himself has stated that the meetings were very informal and there was very little serious 'training' going on. Carlsen's actual coaches and seconds deserve far more recognition than Gary.
@Baker Right where can I check it? Could you please send a link
In recent years, I've heard Carlsen compliment Anand more than any other player.... and Magnus does NOT do that often. So your usage of the word "enemy" may be off a bit. Competitor perhaps?
Not true. It was inevitable
Just imagine when Magnus retires and he gets to train the next super champion
Not his personality
@@jaylenlenear7850 where do you know?...
Yes so hurry up about making your babies. Maybe it can be your kid
Firouzja
@@seife41
Where do I know? 😃
I know in the south east united states at the moment and In fact, I currently Know a great deal in Florida. Furthermore, in my youth, I've known across Parts of Canada and Tamaulipas.
Where do YOU know? 😂
Kasparov created a monster
Seriously. Magnus was ranked #4 with an overly aggressive streak. Within months of working with Kasparov, he evolved into the clear #1 with a universal style.
Not at all. He didn't create Magnus. The guy was already in TOP 10 and going up. He helped, yes. How much exactly he helped we can't say.
@@Zveruidfly Magnus jumped from #4 to #1 in the months that Kasparov began mentoring him. Either that's an incredible coincidence, or Kasparov tapped into some hidden talent by shoring up the remaining weaknesses in Magnus' game.
@@siphillis Like the guy said though, that's refining him, not creating him.
@@ziadkhayat7299 Refining is more precise, but past semantics, one way or the other, the idea is correct and comprensible.
Kasparov was so right about western chess players becoming celebrities and bringing popularity to chess. What a brillant mind
2:18 that proud father smile lol
1.01 does Garry mean that after fischer left chess it become un famous
@@rgc7263 answer please
The proud father and the genius son.
Proud genius father and genius son
@@txrrtle9387 proud genius father and a 10x more genius son than his father*
I don't think they are related. Not even metaphorically.
@@jasonlee7928 ??? what would make you think that
@@jasonlee7928 not sure where you got the "10x" multiplier from. Kasparov dominated the world for roughly 25 years. we have yet to see if Carlsen's dominance will last as long.
I would love to see a movie about their relationship with Kasparov's life and history and Magnus' rise and future.
Garry knew Magnus is one of the greatest talents of all time and is gonna be a monster, so he wanted to be a part of his legacy.
And Magnus paid him a fortune to be his trainer.
Now magnus encounters others prodigies like alireza,duda, and esipenko.
@@siphillis Magnus had sponsors even back then.
@@pedrochalaco1 its different, time has changed I think we will maybe never have a long time Worldchampion again
Garry has a legacy of his own
Both are very sympathetic characters because they are not bragging and keep in mind that nobody is perfect.
Carlsen is often bragging, but what can you say. He's a beast.
Both are bigger braggers than, flash, Anand, Kramnik or Karpov. Kasparov in his day was rather nasty.
I'm REALLY impressed with Magnus' English. It's almost perfect NOW, didn't know it was that good when he was 18-19 too!
I'm more surprised by how lacking it is, especially for a Scandinavian.
Why are you that impressed lol?
0:45 his talking about xQc and how they need someone like him to make Chess popular.
Interesting. I never heard about xQc until I saw Hikaru training him
xQc is a good start, but now you have people like ElRubius playing with Hikaru. ElRubius has double the numbers of xQc
Q: How does it feel to have Kasparov as a trainer?
Magnus sounds like: Yeah whatever, I will be no. 1 anyway
Oh I love the authentic smile at :19, when Kasparov called him a world-class talent. Once upon a time, he wasn't used to it
Kasparov: magnus is on his way there
Magnus: I will try my best to become world number one
Magnus: I know I have what it takes
He became world no. 1 for the first time later that year
this aged very well
If anyone tell "I want to be the best in the World for long time", it is pride. If Magnus tell thet, it is prediction of reality.
A great champion doesn't become necessarily a great trainer.
Magnus talked about the period that Kasparov trained him: one or two years, I think, and they saw some openings; he said also that one Kasparov's main contributions was the style of play and psychology of his big rivals, Krammik, Vishy, Topalov, etc. Their strengths and weaknesses in competition. Magnus was amazed with Garry's knowledge at this level.
But that was it! Garry didn't create anyone. Their styles and work habits were the opposite. Besides, their personal relationship became tense over the years. Nakamura, who worked with Garry also, complained about his iron discipline and unbreakable ambition in the training process. Naka didn't like that Soviet discipline, neither did Magnus.
Garry helped Magnus in a particular period of his life. Nothing more. Stop saying that he created a champion. That is very far from the truth
Chill bruh
The main reason chess isn't as popular to watch as football (the real football where you kick the ball) or whatever is that it's incredibly difficult to understand what's even going on. How many people actually understand why a move is good during a classical tournament?
Almost all of the great chess players need to start at 6 to 8 years old, and you usually need good parents (educated parents, as well). The Pogar sisters are basically what chess is all about. It will never be played by the masses.
This guy looks cool he could be number one, one day
Carlsen is a genius in any language.
Great interview, thank you!! Love these little snippets of insight into the making of a champion !!! One thing I picked up one beside Magnus' raw sheer talent ... he made the decision and declaration for all to hear to be number 1 ... and, not only that, to be number 1 for many years!! Well, Magnus ... stating what you were about to do was no accident !!! Articulating goals are part of the journey to success.
Then why did Karjakin fail?
@@zah936 Good point, life happens. But put it this way. If Carlsen didn't believe he would be number 1... he most likely would never have been.
Kasparov is still the best chess player ever, but Magnus would be champion even he didn´t met Garri.
i am glad it wasn't a Michael Jackson Culkin relationship but an Ip Man Bruce Lee one
Better start training firouzja now garry.
If u want to be a part of it
When Firiuzja matures he’s going to smoke the field
@@Mach1Airspace No. He'll be an Ivanchuk, Grischuk, Nakamura, Radjabov, or maybe even an Aronian, but not like Karpov, Fischer, Kasparov, Carlsen, Anand, etc. He doesnt have the temperament, discipline, or aptitude. To be the best, you have to have the best trainers, environment, etc, but most importantly, the aptitude and drive. Firouzja doesnt have either. People thought the same of Gata Kamsky. He (Kamsky) had a bang start and he fizzled out.
@@staryoke Like I said: "when he matures". And BTW, he looked damn disciplined saving a draw out of Giri's jaws of defeat today in a 6 hour brawl during the 2nd to last round of TATA Steel, so try not to yap too much about who's got the temperament and who's going to fizzle. Give the 17 yr old some credit and cut him some slack. Today he was a monster and is the toast of the chess world proving your comment all wrong. M1 out.
@@Mach1Airspace "m1 out" that is so cringe please stop doing that
@@staryoke What a dumb comment
Nice interview. What a Dreamteam: Kasparov and Carlsen! Right, it could not be better!
Teenage Magnus was extremely socially awkward.
Palpatine with Vader! Indeed Kasparov helped creating a "monster".
kasparov be like " if I am gonna retire I'm gonna leave my greatest legacy "
the question now is who would succeed magnus ?
Duda,Alireza ,Esipenko.. magnus must prepare to fight prodigies(like he once was)
Alireza 100%
Alireza esipenko nihal sarin and the older dudes like fabi , ding , nepo have a chance of beating the world champ. but firo is the best bet to beat magnus and take the throne
Dubov has the capacity, in my opinion, but he reminds me in some ways of Fischer where he refuses to compromise his desire to just have fun and enjoy his way of playing.
@@pedrochalaco1 as much as I'm rooting for Duda (who's my compatriot), he's inconsistent, and not that great with opening preparation (by elite standards). I think he tends to rely on his talent. it may be enough for staying close to the top, but not necessarily sufficient to reach for the crown. I wouldn't bet we'll get to see a Polish world chess championship any time soon.
Botvinik trained Kasparov and Kasparov trained Carlsen. I hope Carlsen continues the tradition and finds a young talent and takes him under his wing. I can only imagine the kind of player she or he would be. But to be honest I'm not so sure if Carlsens personality is the one needed to be that generous and patient.
Kasparov was a pretty emotional guy during his time wasn't he? I don't think anyone would have thought of him as a trainer back then but I might be wrong
To train a future champion is in a certain way staying alive in the high lights for someone who chess is a real passion
“I feel certain that I have the potential” well… that aged quite well 😂
10 years before Magnus reached what, he himself in a recent interview [2024], called his "peek" in 2019.
Always two there are. No more, no less. A master, and an apprentice.
He did not disappoint :)
the first time they met he bit him and Kasparov was so pissed
I believe it was a draw.
@@jomjom75 no. after a long thinking while he was bored from waiting eventually Kasparov gave up and left the match unfinished. I was surprised whan I watched this video. apparently their friendship happened after that. you can even see in Carlsen's face he didn't appreciate his comment
I’d be pissed too if my opponent bit me
I did not realize their careers were so intertwined
That's what Kasparov wants you to think.
Kasparov is legend, Magnus is legend. different generations
Old, not rare. I saw this when it came out.
Riggs and Murtaugh
Damon and Affleck
These two cats.
Magnus said "He has potential to be number 1 for many years" and he did it
King is gambit accepted
Magnus did not disappoint.
"The only born star since Fischer". Apart from himself. He forgot Karpov.
No, he did not.
@@jaimecaballero8267 When did he mention Karpov in this show??
@@blackarrow9072 hahahaha you are so funny.
He ment western geniuses (Fischer, Carlsen) before it was all soviet World Champions era.
@@kinga4796 IC. Carlsen beat Karpov when he was 13, and Karpov reacted with respect. Kasparov played a draw against Carlsen around the same time, and Kasparov left without giving the young Carlsen a compliment. Kasparov is a bad loser.
magnus was shy
El alumno superó al maestro.
So even in chess interviews they cough. Hmmm.
no 1 for 20 yrs , he is a god
Magnus is the greatest chess player of all time . Kasparov has nothing to do here . He is just trying to get some credit . .Kasparov is a legend in chess no doubt. / However his behavior is misdemeanor. He went and even trolled publicly that first time worlds best players is not playing in WC( vishy / galfrand). He Was purely jealous about vishy winning 4th WC.This cocky guy even supported vishy to dethrone kramnik who crushed him first time ever in WC. Then later he trained magnus against vishy .. sick politics !!
This video should be retitled: "Kasparov and Carlsen discuss their romantic relationship"
@BEWARE OF WD Why?
Great upload, +1 Sub.
1.01 does he mean after bobby fischer left chess chess not famous no more is that what he meant
In reality - Magnus turned Gary down - he did not want to train with him - this i heard in an interview with Magnus' father - who did not intervene - he let Magnus make his own decisions
whats Alexander Rybak doing there??
It is in the year he won Eurovision with a crashing score and since he is also from Norway I guess that's pretty much why
This is Fredrik Skavlan Show... every week he used to have a random mix of celebrities of all kinds.
My thoughts exactly
2:01 "I have the feeling I can become number 1 for many years.
2023: Number 1 in the world, still after many years.
The man can look into future! He should become a professional, wouldn't you agree?
Carlsen must have learned a lot from.Mr.Dubov than Mr.Kasparov
Who? You mean that kid who's pretty good right now vs the 20 year world number one?
GTFOH
U think the western superstar is Hikaru now alt least when its about popularity.
I was wondering if Carlson pay him for coach him and how much
Oh wow, history is showing that Kasparov was right. Since a Western champion has come along streaming, and the promotion of chess has never been bigger.
Magnus is the best ever. I find it hard to imagine anyone comes close to him in the next fifty years.
P.S.
The similarity between English and Norwegian is just hilarious!
What? XD
Until Alpha Zero kid comes along. 🤣😂
Its easy to imagine tho because kasparov did say in an interview that new players are always better than the older generation because of the growing knowledge within chess
Well, you didn’t let him down Magnus 👍
It will be sad to see when Magnus got aged and beaten and dethroned by one of new younger generation kids.
And Magnus with others have helped chess have that break through.
Kasparov, being an egomaniac, would love to take credit for Magnus' success, claiming that he "created" him. Magnus clearly is not so amused by that idea. And rightfully so, he has a very different style than Kasparov, so the lessons might have been useful, but that was not the key element in his chess education. I would imagine that Magnus regrets having worked with Gary nowadays for all these reasons.
What a bunch of BS
Kasparov never claimed he created him.
Western born stars would not still really bring popularity to chess tbh as much as Kasparov thinks it is
Kasparov is a great player but I wish he would have still been playing when Bobby Fischer was around I think Boby Fischer would have destroyed him.
years ago when I saw vishi play Magnus and and lose against him I knew he would be champion.now,I have seen a lot of GM's.beat Carlson but I don't get that feeling from any of them although I believe Rajabov,Alireza,and ding liren are the only ones that can take the title away from Carlson one day.
I wonder what happened to that young kid?
He became a supermodel.
he is the world champion now.. but wait im on the way too
when you cant beat him join him... hahaha
He did beat him, several times.
So many dumb people saying Kasparov wanted to extend his legacy.
Dude nobody cares about his contribution to Magnus' play. He's the greatest of all time in chess. You don't need more legacy.
Какого х нет русских комментариев! Каспаров - играй в шахматы! Ты че лезешь в политику России! Ты же из Баку! Лезь туда!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
who cares what people said 12 years ago
Kasparov is the Madonna of chess. Madonna was aging , being overshadowed by younger newer talent even becoming irrelevant yet she simply traded on her past and got involved with these new talents thus keeping her relevant . It is somewhat parasitic.
Kasparov has a huge ego and could not stand to have posterity say he was not involved in the development of the chess monster that is MAGNUS. OF COURSE IN TIME HE WILL TAKE CREDIT FOR THE MAGNUS'S SUCCESS.
You think like a psycho
you ok dude.. ?
You seem to have it all figured out Mr Know-it-all.
You seem to know a lot without backing it up with any evidence and I'm not sure why you seem to have such a negative view on his motives. I don't see any reason to disbelieve the reasons Kasparov stated in the video. Whether he is THE best is a matter of opinion, but it's undeniable he is ONE of the best and as such, he has nothing more to prove. He received lots of support and coaching when he was in Magnus's position and he is giving something back.
I think Kasparov is a pretty top bloke personally.
he trained magnus for like a year when magnus was a kid
relax crazy pants