Відео

Pinche mamón jajajajaja

Kramnik used the same strategy Kasparov used to beat Karpov bare Kasparov's low blows .

He is what Americans think Fischer is and Norwegians think Magnus is. He is the OG! A dude who basically popped out of nowhere and beat everyone.

isn't kramnik a cheater?

I can vouch for Seirawan's remarks: when I enjoyed breakfast, followed by a blitz session with Tal, he had a cigarette and bottle of vodka in hand the whole time during the play. There was a short break during which he spoke with his lady friend in Germany.

His new idea was to do cheating by hitting clock and toilet gate hard to distract Young Anand.

The questioner didn't specify Stonewall Attack (w/White) or Stonewall Dutch Defense (w/Black).

His ego is so inflated....

😂😂🤣🤣🤣

The chess speaks for itself

What does the stupid say? Capa won NY 1927 not NT 1924. Red thumb.

Even more interesting is how Kasparov won the 1995 championship against Anand. Anand took the lead in game 9. In game 10, every time Kasparov made a move, he got up to go to the bathroom and slammed the door behind him so hard the room shook. The young and mild mannered Anand did not complain to the arbiter, who also did not act. Bullying destroys lives, and bullied children suffer lifelong low self esteem. I don't care how good his moves are on the board; if he needs such despicable tactics in order to win, then he is no champion.

And here I am getting my first win in classical OTB chess against a grandmaster at the age of 43 and my second OTB win vs a GM a few days before my 44th birthday ( Ok, the second GM was 54 and had his rating significantly dropped, but the first one was only 46 and was around 2500 FIDE on the day of the game, former 2600 player). Prior to that I only played one other GM in classical OTB when I was a teenager and I lost ( so the score is 2-1 for me for now). But to be honest, Kasparov is right in general, the two GMs I defeated were past their prime ( but I am not so young either)

Even Kasparov vs Fischer never happened 😢 two world no. 1 of there times

I love how he says this as if every single high level player doesn't do this all the time. Kramnik was just that great to be able to execute.

Age 54, world # 10! Vishy ..

Because Anand was trained by Russian so you didn't play aggressively

Magnus looks like he’s a foetus 😂

Bro said nothing!!!

"gentelman like Kramnik" sounds funny in 2024 🙃

He did not disappoint :)

I think Fischer would have beaten Karpov pretty confortably but still we will never know for certain.

Sigma rant.

Fischer didn't quit chess because he had anything better to do, he was just burned out and couldn't continue. His total immersion training regimen had him studying chess night and day for 15 years and he couldn't keep it up. Every other world champion was able to balance chess and real life better than Fischer did. He didn't make like Alekhine and avoid just one person, he avoided all chess.

No one saw it was coming ?? As far as I know, at least Reti predicted that Alekhine would win…

Garry is spot on. Something very fishy about that match and what happened afterwards.

Nobody saw this coming lol. They interviewed over 100 GMs recently on who is the GOAT of chess and Alekhine was in first place with a considerable gap between him and the rumnner-up. True, Alekhine was never able to win against Capa before the match but neither was Fisher against Spassky in 1972. I would argue that Alekhine pulled a bigger defeat over Capablanca than Fisher over Spassky.

oh my god they really look like a bunch of dorks... it just accured to me, except mayby Fisher i dont think we ever had an athletic world champ

He wouldn't defeat Fischer. Even him deep down knows that. Fischer was playing at a 2800+ level, his rating had not stabilized. Karpov's top career rating was 2780.

My right ear loved this video

I could easily see Fischer going down by 3 maybe 4 points in a first-to-ten-win match (much like Kasparov did), and then grinding back to a 10-8 victory. It would be grueling to play and fascinating to watch. It took Fischer a while to "figure out" Spassky (he had not won a single game from him prior to 1972), but once he did, he dominated him. Karpov was in incredible form, but he lacked Fischer's energy. Being a much stronger opponent than Spassky, Karpov would have forced Fischer to a higher level, again just like he forced Kasparov to a higher level. Once you have achieved your life's ambition, it is very difficult to summon the energy to repeat it. It would be great if those who knew him best would comment on his mental state after winning in 1972 and discuss why he didn't defend his title.

10 years before Magnus reached what, he himself in a recent interview [2024], called his "peek" in 2019.

Raymond Keene looked like the fat kid at school being forced to run

Fischer didn't play a serious game after his victory in 1972. In an interview with Johnny Carson he said he will continue to play but not too many, so he didnt't want to give away his secrets. Now in the 60's he would not play for some time also. So this is his nature, but rest assured you he study the games and Karpov games. In an interview, he states Karpov refuse to play him according to win 10 games and 9/9 he retains the title. Karpov should have agree to his terms, than Fiscfer would have no excuse. But Fischer real downfall was not playing this match but not playing any serious game after 1972 (1992 doesn't count). He lived for chess, it was his love just like my wife is to me. I enjoy chess and play it all night long. Why did Paul Morphy realy quit?

What year is this from and where was it?

Every Capablanca game is like a chess lesson; each move is explained by the moves that follow, and you come away feeling like now you can play like that yourself (of course it's not actually as easy as he made it look).

When Kasparov says a match was really tough..phew..that must have been something!..a young Anand must have had genuine talent to challenge Kasparov.

Even more disastrous was the beginning of the first match with Karpov. But Kasparov learned to persevere and adapt. From 0-4, he reached 3-5. Of course, it was a different rules match: you needed six wins to win. With the rules from 2000, Karpov would have won the first match. With the rules of the 80s, Krammnik probably wouldn't have won. It is a bit like the story of the Capablanca Alehin match.

“I feel certain that I have the potential” well… that aged quite well 😂

Fischer was afraid of Karpov! He fled the confrontation. He was just a cheeky, arrogant wunderkind who was lost to history.

Where's this whole interview????

In game 10 I demonstrated a new novelty which shook his confidence, which was to slam the glass door hard after every move to distract Anand, brilliant move, always works.

Bro literally resorted to “bad personality” tactics. He would shut the door behind him so hard, whole building would shake. Also the clock slamming, also the cold demeanor. That’s how he came back

I agree with Garry Kasparov 100%!!!! If Bobby Fischer & Anatoly Karpov met in a match....It would have been incredible.... I heard rumors that people tried to set up a Fischer Karpov match in the late 1970's, with both Fischer & Karpov getting 5 Million dollars each....

Perfectionism is good but over-perfectionism leads to destruction

True

Suspicious

the best candidate

Lasker, Capa , Alechine, Steinitz, Morphy. He knows who is who.

Korchnoi's story is proof that god does not exist.