Common Law in high court
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 вер 2024
- Family Law can be tricky, but Dayne understood Common Law and won his case, without a barrister or lawyer, to keep his daughter in this country with him when the dispute was taken to the high court.
Get a 10% discount on Dayne's book Family Law by adding VOBESFAMILY at the checkout on his website.
Copy and paste the links to a browser
Website: www.lorebydejure.com
Email: lorebydejure@proton.me
Instagram: lorebydejure
UA-cam: lorebydejure
--------------------------------------------------------
Ways to support the channel:
You can make donations of precious metals to a value of your choice via Bleyer Bullion, using the following link: tinyurl.com/mt...
You can donate via PayPal www.paypal.me/...
Other ways to help.
Buy Clive De Carle supplements: tinyurl.com/5n...
Buy Shungite: www.ftwproject...
Buy gold or silver from Bleyer Bullion. New customer save £10 on orders using voucher code VOBES10 at checkout, when spending £250 or more. Bleyer donate £10 to the channel every time to support me each time this is used.
Huge thanks to Black Cat Computers for hosting and running my website: black-cat-comp...
My Website: richardvobes.com/
My Rumble Channel: rumble.com/use...
OTHER CHANNELS
Vobes Show - / @vobesshow
The English Couple - / @the-english-couple
Julia's channel - / @juliahartley
The Naked Englishman Podcast - nakedenglishma...
#commonlaw #courts #familylaw
I am impressed. Well done Dayne. We had a 5yr battle years ago with a leading Mortgage Company. We wouldn't back down and won. My wife is a brilliant letter writer. They bottled it when they realised we were going to go all the way.
Legal battle? Did this go to court?
Great job sticking to your guns 🙌
Well done Dayne. You are a generous guy in writing a book to share your knowledge.
Taught by Karl Lenz.
I see the legal system as a system populated by dishonourable tricksters. I evidence how jurisdiction is gained to support that statement.
@@catherinesengupta4699 It’s a free book?
He's a breath of fresh air.
Can you imagine what that would have cost if you hired a legal team to do it for you, if they even agreed to take on the work? Well done Dayne you earned it
It’s a straightforward custody case, any family law solicitor could have easily argued the sane result
Back again @@RogerRamjet-t4q
@@RogerRamjet-t4q You can imagine then? Any ideas? I cant see high court being cheap
@@ohnoitisnt it wouldn’t have gone to high court, family court would have agreed it
@@RogerRamjet-t4q
...and you rogerrrrrr ramcock are just a straightforward little naughty boy who doesn't know any better...time for bed now lil rog...and polish those boots nice and shiny...no playing with the other boys
👌 🥒 👋
What a great achievement! Well done Dayne for striking a blow for the people against the establishment.
Not really 🤷♂️.
@@RogerRamjet-t4q Are you planning on discouraging every positive comment? Your trying to be a troll. But I think your only accomplishment was to show everyone what a boot licker you are.
@@bearcountrypublishing5303bootlicker! 😂😂😂😂 every low achievers fallback for why they’d failed in life
@@SirRogerHerwellcommonlaw is the law of the land. statutes, acts, legislation are opinions, of parliment. With no disrespect the likes of Dianne Abbott, liz Truss, Alexander boris de-pfeffel johnson, kier stamer can put forward consideration for acts, statutes but there not law, just opinions!
@@10tendogsdoniecommon law is replaced by statutory law 🤦♂️
don't be afraid to use facts ...... fear removes you're confidence so learn the facts ..... 1st thing he did was learn himself 🙏🏽
Your
I didn't here any facts, only silly pseudo-law.
Yet another exellent guest Richard.
Love your show❤
Your daughter has a great Dad, well done.
1935 Webster's Dictionary defined 'Sovereign' as: " In a Democracy, The People are the Sovereign."
So a dictionary used the word being defined in its meaning did it ? B U L L S H I T E
Lol "They" don't use Webster's......Blacks Law n few others
@@theedge5584they don’t use Blacks, it’s for sovtards
Sovereign birth certificate means they own you.
How can anyone own you, no baby consented to the birth cert, which makes it all null & void.
I went through 2 solicitors during a divorce, when the bill got to over £25k I stepped away and represented myself, best decision I ever made 🙏🏽
Thieves and corrupt lawyers
Both sides' lawyers will always drag the case out as much as possible so as to keep their gravy train going.
having to go to court and argue with strangers about how much you see your kids is one of the worst experiences possible.
Once you register them, are they really yours?
@@G-ra-ha-m YES
You see goats ?
@@G-ra-ha-m They are yours not by registration to the state. Legally, they are yours by your creation of them. Dayne explains this in the interview. It appears you are still swayed by their indo ctr i nation.
@@istudios225 Lawfully they are ours, legally - well that's just rules of the corporation..
This is an amazing revelation ,well done to this bloke for his fortitude and congratulations on his success, onward & upward
So much and I have so much now to the point of unlawfully using the law. so many of us are doing what is right with law of the land
A marriage license causes this, Karl Lentz says the same thing that the government has no control over your property.
It was Karl Lentz who helped! Big love to Karl :)
Government created two monsters in Karl Kents and Rob Menard by taking away their kids
@LoreByDeJure I thought it was Karl you was talking about. I will be purchasing your book. Fair play to you 👏 ❤
@@twsbibanghorn7343 Thank you. I searched for both names and results didn't show them. Had to do another search with inverted commas " " before I found them.
I am afraid I had the most awful path through utterly absurd and expensive court cases regarding my child. My ex, a lawyer knew every loop hole and avenue and put us both through hell. In the end after creating a nightmare and barely paying for his child he ended up with the court order to pay £1 per month. Of course he never did that either. Cost me thousands to chase nothing. How I wish I had this man's book and his idea to go it alone with common law. Well done.
Then you’d have got nothing
@@RogerRamjet-t4q Your statement sound like a horrible assumption to me. Maybe, if you could type more than five words, you might explain yourself.
@@bearcountrypublishing5303 because if you’d gone up against an experienced legal team spouting sovtard nonsense, they’d have made you look mentally unstable and possibly dangerous
@@RogerRamjet-t4q They did get nothing. And yet Dayne WON his case. 77th aren't sending their best today.
@@Dylstardelux well someone isn’t 😂😂😂 This is a totally different case 😂😂😂😂 try harder 😂😂😂
I applaud this young man! Tenacious, confident, and an inspiration! Well done for all your research..and your victories.
Awesome.👏
I'm so glad, as an older (!),that this intelligent young man is standing up for himself ( and by virtue others) and has taken his time to understand and disseminate the 'law (Lore) of the land'. Inspirational and heartwarming as all our immediate descendants need to prepare for the political pressures and silencing never mind the obfuscation from the 'poers that be'. Good Luck to you Dayne and God bless you and yours !
What a man he is fair play to you mate👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
thank God. our side really needed a win. Bless you both XXX
Congratulations Dayn. Thank you for sharing & thanks Richard.
Oh wow. I wish I had researched more myself. I was in family courts myself few years back I had no understanding of what was going on. I have learned a lot the past year watching this channel. But I was arguing private and was told it would be taken into the public if I didn't agree with something that day. Thankfully it stayed in the private and I won myself in the end. Am going to get his book and do some research into this
Love, truth and light.
💯❤️💯💪💯🦁🙏
Well done Dayne. he is only one of four people I have saw online that got a positive Judgement, with Michael o bernicia, and Ditch Your Council Tax! 9 Steps to Beat the System
Book by Alistair Ziddah, and of course webby ( The Angels helped him lol ) There must be a handful more around England, but these are rare In England to get the better of the freemasonic justice system.
Thank you. They are rare only because they are b lock ed, cen sore d and can cell ed. There are many, many more out there. Every time I name even one of them, my comment gets de let ed or bloc k ed. You just need to keep looking for them. Though, to be fair, there are a few who are a bit dodgy. Most of them I have found to be legit and very helpful. Yes, MOB is a giant among them. This fine guest will be added to my list.
That man is an absolute diamond .. can you even begin to imagine the changes we could make if every man acted like this one
I had to rely on YT,for advice for divorce. The EX had 5 solicitors who all are vultures. But I did win.... Parity is the word Equal Parity. The court's can no longer rinse any man and leave them with nothing.
Brilliant well done
Dayne’s daughter is blessed! Thanks both 💚
Good for you Dayne.....Inspirational.
Your daughter is so lucky to have a free man like you for a father 👍🏼🙏🏼❤️
Well done Dayne this proves that the Magna Carta is still alive and kicking, & that high court judges know that and abided by it!
Great show lots of helpful advice shared concisely
😅😅😅
The same can't be said of a google search (cut n' pasted the link and found nothing of value) Tried the same on Duck Duck & BINGO results miraculously appeared. The freedom of info censorship run-around continues full steam ahead.
Thank you for sharing the knowledge that everyone should know. Excellent video. Big shoutout to Dayne!
Richard you are awesome! Thank you for your channel and time. Very appreciated!!!
Not all dads are bad and Dayne is an example. Many children are damaged by usually the mother using them as ammunition without a thought of what it is doing to the children . Nobody is saying that children should not be protected from violent parents be that Male or Female but they need to put their children first .
I hate to simplify this but in all honestly he would have won custody regardless. Thd child was already in his custody and had her life with him, had her friends and school etc. No judge is going to uproot a child from stability like that. On the other hand, if the daughter had been in his ex wife's custody at the time then there wouldn't have been anything he could have done to stop it, unless he could have put a good case across to show that uprooting the child would cause harm.
I don't think it is so simple. There is a bias for courts to award custody of young children to the mother. The mother could also have fabricated reasons why he should not have custody. She may not have had proof about her allegations, but he had prepared all his documents carefully and thoroughly.
Thank you Dayne, so clear.....bless you.
Legend my bro and thanks for getting him on 👏
Dayne is my friend and I’ve bought his book. Everyone should go get it. He’s made it very easy to understand as well in the book and for beginners made it easy to start the process of tackling The Council Tax Scam.
Great interview, very interesting, thank you.
Please, consider writing a book for our children or for their mothers and fathers , guardians , so we can teach them in understandable language 💜
Good for him. Wouldn’t it be great if everyone had that confidence and knowledge. Anyone bringing up children should teach them this.
Absolutely fantastic!!
Well done, Dayne. Thank you keep up the good work.
As I understand it, Common Law is to do with precedent (Latin: Stare Decisis) from previously established case law made by judges when passing / delivering judgement (in contrast to legislation which is made by a competent legislative body). Lower Courts are bound by the decisions of Superior Courts etc under Common Law. This case might not necessarily have been one won by case law precedent but he sounds like he did successfully navigate the system and persuade by reason the merits of his position. Congratulations and well done on getting a positive result 👏 👍
You are quite right Damien. We loosely used the term common law but rather meaning more Natural law regarding maintaining a "private capacity". The first angle was that the judge/courts are without right, interfering with my right to property.
That is the co-opted common law of the BAR, the original common law is essentially a libertarian custom that posited all was lawful in right of your own person and property until you trespassed upon anothers right, Common law was corrupted by the Courts in the 18th Century when they had a spat with the Admiralty Court over who is getting more Business and ended up co-opting that jurisdiction into Common Law ... which is why we have the legal maze of complexity that the Courts are playing around with today.
@@LoreByDeJure I don't regard this as being a natural law. I made a comment elsewhere here regarding my thoughts about this. To me it was more Trust Law & Contract. Natural Law seems too ambiguous from my perspective, whereas Trust Law & Contract Law fit this situation in an ocams razor kind of way.
Not quite. You are talking about Common Law as defined by Statutory Law courts. They call it Case Law or Precedent Law, as you've said. The Common Law ordinary men and women are concerned with and which protects them is Natural Law or Universal Law or Original Law which has existed since the beginning of time. Therefore, it supercedes and stands above all other bodies of law.
@@genuinearticle33 Thank you. Excellent explanation. 👍
Amazing!
Paid 20 grand to a Lincons inn law firm (Finers) who abandoned me, Family Court (her idea) nailed my ass to a stake awarded her my house and 50% income for 12 years to keep her in the manor she'd become accustomed. 20 years on i rent a bedsit she owns what my life's work represented and my best mate lives rent free. Small change for a book guys that may change your life. Ps I knew he was a good mate nobody else was prepared to take her off my hands
What a lovely young man..well done Dayne..you should feel very proud…
Well done Dwayne🙏💕👏
What a fabulous young man. Thank you Richard for this interview - he is amazing
SALUTATIONS RICHARD
What a great guy,100% behind his way of doing it❤❤
Wow Dayne is soooo lucky to have friends on his wavelength.
Great interview Richard, thanks for sharing.
Wish id known all this 15 years ago.... Good on that man.
It now is in case law and also that means unlawful what they did so ...............
@@kayleighhirst6544no it’s not. It’s whatever is in the best interests of the child even if the dad is a bit bonkers but harmless
@@RogerRamjet-t4qthats the way it should be im afraid its not the case, we know a child gone fir 10 years, still ongoing,
@@10tendogsdonie then the best interests of the child are not with its parents
@@RogerRamjet-t4q
Naughty lil roger talking cow poop again....bed now.... 😂
Thank you Richard & Dayne great info! 👍🏼😉💯
Richard you really are a Star Thx you so much for your wonderful videos
Superb. Thank you for an inspiring discussion.
Finally Richard, someone who actually knows their stuff. You and Dayne are still in the Language Trap! Think about who defines Language!
Refreshing to see this young man looking after is future.
What a great young man with powerful information. Will purchase your book today!
Well done. Super
give this man a medal 😎
Smart young man. Great interview.
When the other side is defended by a lawyer,I'm going to assume it's a corporation also
Although valid point about playing their game against them. It's not always best to resist their scham systems
If you don't know the game before entering court, you'll get caught...
What a nice knowledgeable guy............................ get him back on, please Richard
Excellent mate glad it worked out for you 👍
Excellent stuff Dayne, very inspiring.
The different between this young man and allegedly Dave ,Dave Murphy,is chalk and cheese,big respect to this gentleman,,but never trust allegedly Dave,this fella walked the walk,unlike mr Murphy 👊🏼🔥
Brilliant discussion guys, and thank you for sharing.
Love your work guys. Really inspiring.
HI Richard from the house of Vobes I love your blogs. I wish that I had the brains to do something about this suitation of getting free
Get Dayne's books. He teaches how to get free in different situations.
You do 🙏 ✨️ 😃
Well done Dane I just brought your book can’t wait to have it in my position
Due to the incredibly low standard of your written English,
I doubt if you would get past the first paragraph of ANY book.
No need for that 😔 😕
Great guest..must get those books ..we should have a lawful matters section in all libraries...with new books in layman's language
Great work, Dayne. 👍
Dayne, Think about who defines Language in the physical world. Once we know who has jurisdiction over the meaning of language, we can prove the fraud. Cheers
Well done Dayne. Sounds like you spoke with John of Law for Mankind. Well done for seeing it through 👍
We are all equal at lore & no one is above the lore. Lawfull & legal two very different entities! LEGAL is the UNDOING OF THE CREATORS LORE ! Do No Harm Cause No Loss cause no Injury…. Is all we need ! Treat others as you expect to be treated . 💜 common bloody decency. The lucifearian corporations must go !
Legal means complying with sovereign law. Lawful means complying with bat 💩 mental Harry Potter laws
@@RogerRamjet-t4q Legal only applies to dumb people who cannot look after their own affairs. 🤡
@@RogerRamjet-t4q Dejure Is all that’s needed & not corporate DEFACTO B/S ….
@@RogerRamjet-t4q it is ILLEGAL to use a LEGAL Name… simplicity in itself !
@@RogerRamjet-t4q The MASONIC SHIT SHOWS A CRUMBLING BENEATH THEIR FEET. 🙏
Me personally, if I had to fight to see my child, I would never use the courts. The reason I say this is because at some point someone used the court and if it wasn't you, then it was her. And if it was her first then why did she need a third party? The first to instigate a court (win or lose) has lost morally. When will we realise that we don't need anyone to tell us what is right or wrong and if we lose the things that we need the most then at least we will die knowing we did what was right.
I lost access to my two daughters when my former spouse decided that it was a good way to punish me .I didn't instigate divorce proceedings and my ex was really only interested in having a couple of children and the then new system of sole parent benefits (Based on Lyndon B Johnsons family law legislation) would see her paid to be a stay at home mother. I decided early to not create a fight or fuss over getting access. I went to the courts thinking it was the right move and soon learnt that it was all wrong. I tried to see my children for 18 months. For my own mental well being and to separate myself from any court action I emigrated to another country. It's been 40 years now and there are grandchildren I will never meet.
Well done Dayne 🙏
I went for a walk threw my park which has loads of trees in the past 3 days of our physical joke government allow weather engineering they made it rain constantly whilst blocking it from sun light for 3 days and they are still doing it right now the trees are now very sick dying and falling over as they are losing there strength and god knows the state of our farm land and stress put on our farmers. I don't know if any one realized but we can not survive with out food and trees that produce our oxygen we are now on the bring of disaster
The judge would have made his decision in accordance with the Children Act 1989, which states that the welfare of the child is the court's paramount consideration. And no amount of sitting down and playing name games and word games will change that. Common law has nothing to do with this statutory requirement.
@@SirRogerHerwellwhat is your beef on commonlaw it stands in time, magma charter is solid,
All legislation since 1972 is null and void.
@@10tendogsdonie I've no issue with common law, just not the Hogwarts version which seems to be so popular with subscribers to this channel.
@@SirRogerHerwell
Busy trolling again. Change your name, because you become too obvious.
@@Alina-eu4fg Why would I want to change my name?
Only watch if you’re capable of witnessing MEN of the highest quality - what a good man! Just stunned because he is a stunner! Thanks Richard just pure love sent to you and yours just so beautiful ❤ well done to both of you, this is the most, the best… 🎉
Legal-ease is "their" language of entrapment...
In this case, Dayne turned it around and used it against them...successfully.
"Master" until the age of 7 years, as you are still the "Master of your own vessel", at 7 you become Mister, a naval term being of the lowest rank, after 7 seven years you can be declared as "lost at sea" and the insurance on the lost package can be claimed, this is then traded via the "birth" certificate. It is a "bond" that the nation can trade with the bank, this "bond" and all "bonds" (certificates and licences) are held with the BIS (Bank of International Settlements). This isn't just a rabbit hole this is a whirl pool deep into an ocean of piracy...
"Midshipman" is the lowest rank in the Royal Navy,
so I recon the rest of your comment is 100% BS too.
@@organickevinlondon "Mister" is a naval term. 🤡
@@organickevinlondon Historically, “Mister” was used as a form of address for officers up to the rank of Lieutenant Commander (O-4), regardless of gender. This title was an expression of respect and affirmation, similar to “Sir” or “Ma’am” used in other contexts.
For example, a junior officer might address a senior officer of the same rank as “Mister” followed by the officer’s surname, such as “Mister Johnson” or “Mister Smith”. This title was not limited to specific roles or positions, but rather was a general term of respect for officers below the rank of Commander.
@@organickevinlondon Research "Maritime Law", Jordan Maxwell is a good start.
It's silly nonsense .
Creator and author has the authority.
legal maxim: "he who creates, owns"
@@LoreByDeJure Exactly. That's how copyright works. Well done and good job, Dayne! 👍 Will get your books. ❤
Well done. You are an inspiration to all. ❤
Esquire means respectful acknowledgement of your properties.
👍👍 Woow Brilliant! 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Since CANADA Law and Courts systems is very much based on the British system, I'll have to review the book and see if it helps us here also.
Cheers
Dayne is a hero!
is he our first Common Law Advocate ? suddenly the future is looking brighter
Nope. He’s a dad getting custody of a child who he’s been parenting for two years.
@@RogerRamjet-t4q and how did he do that ?
@@SirRogerHerwellthrough commonlaw, it was a civil matter, so no claiment,
@@10tendogsdonie SirRogerUnwell is a troll posting lies and misinformation.
@@SirRogerHerwell have you read the judgement ?
My sentiments Exactly Richard , great to see some younger set getting on board . Majority of the groups I belong to are on pensions , which is a whole other issue . Is the pension scheme a way to remove the experienced heads from society ?. I think we may have a huge win for 'private equitable honorable people power' ,will take a while to get its boots on ,but I think it officially happened on the 23rd ,which is 7 years from the sign of the son of man in 2017 ??. Birth pains ,end up with, babies ,new life . Exciting times
I used “a common Law defence” which hinges on “an honestly held belief” to beat a 32K criminal damage claim brought by a golf club, common Law is real…
Amazing well done and thank you for sharing this and writing in the book. I will definitely be in the book.
😂 hmmm what’s that on your jumper! Is that the star of chaos..
It's actually the letter "D" put in a circle to make it look like a geometric pattern :)
Tremendously valuable content!! Thank you Richard ,
&, Congratulations and Thank you Dane!!
I shall go to have a cry now, and file this under "Things that I wished I knew approx 15 Years ago!!"!!
My Hubby is going to buy Danes book for me,I am Certain this will be most illuminating!!
Thank You Both for this!!
Andrea and Critters. ...XxX...
Wouldn’t it be nice to do a course in common law and how to use it
Great work
Fabulous and well done!
Good Man well done
❤Fantastic ❤
Please write a book on road traffic offences- we will all buy that book
That’s a criminal offence not a family court so no judge would listen to a sovtard spouting 💩