I don't subscribe to that many channels. You won me with this solution. I've listened to a dozen-plus "You-Tube University" vids on the "next miracle noise suppression solution." I would listen to their rationale...and then their samples with an open mind...and then think, "Meh, I'm not even sure *you* here what you think you here." I was also about to write Waves off because you have, what, 4+ noise suppression solutions? Then I saw this vid: Noise suppression plugins in a chain. Like compression, I thought, "makes sense, different algorithms not "overapplied." ...So I pulled the trigger on both pieces WNS + NS1. Bought them this morning. Wow - Barely 5 minutes in, and this chained solution was clocking it out of the park. It's fast, smart. The two plugins work together well. Very very happy with this solution.
Both are brilliant and I am very glad to have them in my kit. Really, so much easier to use and with less artefacts and weirdness than I have experienced using the previous ‘fingerprint’ type processes. 🙏😎
Love love theses plugins. Helps so much for anything you record that’s quiet ie vocals or acoustic guitar. As well as any instance of a room mic where you have to crank up the gain. Using them in parallel is a game changer.
i use both sparingly during the post mix stage, usually to tame high-end air or an annoying click in the sample, thankfully both situations do no harm for my lo-fi, sample-based production as a lil imperfections never hurt. never used both at the same time though, but i understand why one would...
Definitely. I usually go no higher than 1.5. Usually around 1.0 does the trick. Seems excessive using it at the level he used in this video, but it still sounded fine. The only issue is that you have to contend with high end loss when you crank it up.
Here’s a solution to consider www.waves.com/plugins/nx-ocean-way-nashville#introducing-nx-ocean-way-nashville-plugin Nx doesn’t deal with poor room acoustics but it does provide you with a stellar sounding virtual mix room over headphones
If you don't want to make one instance of WNS work too hard processing a particularly noisy track, couldn't you just use a second instance of WNS to clean up the remainder of the noise instead of buying NS1 to use as the second plugin?
Depending on how bad the source audio is, with any form of noise suppression there will often be some small tonal trade off to consider such as the highs being choked slightly. Personally, I’d rather that than persistent hiss or hum. If you need to make up the highs, try adding a dynamic EQ (such as F6) after the noise remover plugins. Use a high shelf but instead of compressing this filter expand it. Alternatively you could also use a harmonic exciter (such as Aphex) to add some brightness. Check our Aphex tutorial out ua-cam.com/video/63nKuxQCdJc/v-deo.html hope that helps, thanks for watching
If you feel the highs get slightly compromised, which would be dependent on the source material, then maybe Aphex could help put some air back into your tracks. We covered this plugin in a tutorial recently ua-cam.com/video/63nKuxQCdJc/v-deo.html
Well, you normally don’t set it super high. I set NS1 no greater than 1.5, and it always does the trick. WNS first, you can control the high end on that. You really don’t lose high end, the gate is pretty good about opening up fast enough in my experience.
Not sure any of these examples need to be any cleaner. Each clip is played in isolation to help viewers really hear the process. In “the real world” most of these examples would be in the context of a mix alongside other tracks, meaning your ear wouldn’t necessarily hear any remaining noise.
Good question! Best to try to mitigate any issues at source, its just good house keeping BUT if your audio sadly ends up with some issues then use these in the mix.
I am having problems with the hiss noise that are intentionally put in on vocal plugins from waves. they add together to make this something interfering. the cla series is really chalanging. any ideas for this?
@@dancooperwaves3685 could you make a fx chain video on based on that acoustic video? how the fx chain should work with all those plugins together or which to exclude, sorry if that too much to ask. struggling a bit
Yes. Feel free to check our system requierments and supported hosts here: www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/supported-hosts www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/system-requirements
Hi there, thank you for reaching out. You are welcome to demo both and see how it works for yourself: www.waves.com/plugins/ns1-noise-suppressor www.waves.com/plugins/wns-noise-suppressor
It is not available for mobile phones. Please check our Supported Hosts and System Requirements here: www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/supported-hosts www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/system-requirements
Clarity vx and deverb does a better job at preserving the signal chain. I have all 3 plugins and I can definitely tell. I also have UAD CVOX and Clarity VX can easily compete against it, that's how good clarity vx is even against Izotope rx.
Never thought of using both together, always used NS1 but this sounds great.
I don't subscribe to that many channels. You won me with this solution.
I've listened to a dozen-plus "You-Tube University" vids on the "next miracle noise suppression solution." I would listen to their rationale...and then their samples with an open mind...and then think, "Meh, I'm not even sure *you* here what you think you here."
I was also about to write Waves off because you have, what, 4+ noise suppression solutions? Then I saw this vid: Noise suppression plugins in a chain. Like compression, I thought, "makes sense, different algorithms not "overapplied."
...So I pulled the trigger on both pieces WNS + NS1. Bought them this morning.
Wow - Barely 5 minutes in, and this chained solution was clocking it out of the park. It's fast, smart. The two plugins work together well. Very very happy with this solution.
Both are brilliant and I am very glad to have them in my kit. Really, so much easier to use and with less artefacts and weirdness than I have experienced using the previous ‘fingerprint’ type processes. 🙏😎
The ns1 is great. Rarely use it. But when you need it, it’s there to save you
exactly what i was looking for!!!!!!!! Great video
Is this somewhat better than using Z-Noise?
Love love theses plugins. Helps so much for anything you record that’s quiet ie vocals or acoustic guitar. As well as any instance of a room mic where you have to crank up the gain. Using them in parallel is a game changer.
i use both sparingly during the post mix stage, usually to tame high-end air or an annoying click in the sample, thankfully both situations do no harm for my lo-fi, sample-based production as a lil imperfections never hurt. never used both at the same time though, but i understand why one would...
The best suppressors ever. Thanks sir😎❤️
this. 👏🏾. is.👏🏾. What.👏🏾. I .👏🏾. NEEDED👏🏾!
Is evolution of the Z-Noise. Perfect.
Love your tutorials! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️👏👏
Thank you kindly
I use NS1 at about 5 or 10 but if you use a gate on Rvox it still allows the high end to peak through
Definitely. I usually go no higher than 1.5. Usually around 1.0 does the trick. Seems excessive using it at the level he used in this video, but it still sounded fine. The only issue is that you have to contend with high end loss when you crank it up.
thank you sir for this amazing trick
awesome vid man! def a help.. I have the whole Waves restoration bundle and one or 2 plugs have helped but hoping these will do the job
numberrrrr 1
Great video would love to see something on cymbal spill from different feets.
Amazing plug. Would I put this first in the chain? Thank you for your time.
this is amazing , a real life saver
"Sleeping with the Fan on...." 🤣
Very funny!! 🤣
Great video!
I love waves audio
I want to purchase these two immediately so I am gonna get the trial download first .
respect. i love you...
do you have a video on dealing with untreated rooms?
Here’s a solution to consider www.waves.com/plugins/nx-ocean-way-nashville#introducing-nx-ocean-way-nashville-plugin Nx doesn’t deal with poor room acoustics but it does provide you with a stellar sounding virtual mix room over headphones
Working better with OTT
Great video! Thanks Dan!
Thanks for sharing buddy! Hope you are well!
Amazing plugins I mean it
This is black magic
veryy helpfull thank u waves
Nice Plugins!!! I Like it....
If you don't want to make one instance of WNS work too hard processing a particularly noisy track, couldn't you just use a second instance of WNS to clean up the remainder of the noise instead of buying NS1 to use as the second plugin?
No, no, no. God. You have to buy more.
Great : )
Thanks
I use these as a monitor engineer but I can't stand how it chokes the highs.
Depending on how bad the source audio is, with any form of noise suppression there will often be some small tonal trade off to consider such as the highs being choked slightly. Personally, I’d rather that than persistent hiss or hum. If you need to make up the highs, try adding a dynamic EQ (such as F6) after the noise remover plugins. Use a high shelf but instead of compressing this filter expand it. Alternatively you could also use a harmonic exciter (such as Aphex) to add some brightness. Check our Aphex tutorial out ua-cam.com/video/63nKuxQCdJc/v-deo.html hope that helps, thanks for watching
Will this technique work on headphone bleeding iinto a microphone?
Yes, it will. You can also try out Clarity Vx for this purpose: www.waves.com/plugins/clarity-vx
i like so much rsrsrs! tnks!
It's great and all until it removes all the highs and mids
If you feel the highs get slightly compromised, which would be dependent on the source material, then maybe Aphex could help put some air back into your tracks. We covered this plugin in a tutorial recently ua-cam.com/video/63nKuxQCdJc/v-deo.html
Well, you normally don’t set it super high. I set NS1 no greater than 1.5, and it always does the trick. WNS first, you can control the high end on that. You really don’t lose high end, the gate is pretty good about opening up fast enough in my experience.
Say Hello to Al Pacino from me ! Haven't heard him in a while.
👍👍👍
this is heavy handed example i`m sure that you can get more clean with less processing
Not sure any of these examples need to be any cleaner. Each clip is played in isolation to help viewers really hear the process. In “the real world” most of these examples would be in the context of a mix alongside other tracks, meaning your ear wouldn’t necessarily hear any remaining noise.
THANK YOU SOOO MUCH!!!!
You are welcome, thank you for watching!
@@dancooperwaves3685 No problem!! Can I record with them on? Or should I turn them on after recording?
Good question! Best to try to mitigate any issues at source, its just good house keeping BUT if your audio sadly ends up with some issues then use these in the mix.
Awesome!!! You've been so much help!!! I appreciate it big time ♥
How about two of them on one channel causing phase issues on Mono recording...
I am having problems with the hiss noise that are intentionally put in on vocal plugins from waves. they add together to make this something interfering. the cla series is really chalanging. any ideas for this?
Turn off the analog knobs wherever you can to reduce the noise.
What about mouth noises?
Superb
What are the best waves plugins for Acoustic Rhythm guitar and Classical guitar
Check this tutorial out that features a few options for mixing acoustics ua-cam.com/video/4X6fhyQ3ukM/v-deo.html
@@dancooperwaves3685 Thank you 😊
@@dancooperwaves3685 could you make a fx chain video on based on that acoustic video? how the fx chain should work with all those plugins together or which to exclude, sorry if that too much to ask. struggling a bit
Can you use this over a vst instrument track real-time ?
0 latency using it natively according to Waves website.
Will this work in Final Cut Pro ?
Is this only for dialogue or can it also be used to remove noise/hum from hardware synths?
it removes all noise from anything
Wow
Is it compatible with presonus studio one ?
Yes. Feel free to check our system requierments and supported hosts here: www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/supported-hosts
www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/system-requirements
@@waves how i get the trial? I want to test it before buying please help.
You can trial our subscription service to check it out: www.waves.com/subscriptions
This is magic 😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wait? Why would you purchase both Waves WNS and NS1 when you could open 2 instances of Waves WNS and accomplish the same goal? 😅
i would love to actually see you use the plugin and explain how to use it, rather than just showing the suggest function
I have about 300 old cassettes I need to clean up an restore.can this work for me or any other one click suggestions
Hi there, thank you for reaching out. You are welcome to demo both and see how it works for yourself:
www.waves.com/plugins/ns1-noise-suppressor
www.waves.com/plugins/wns-noise-suppressor
Hello . Is this app available for a mobile phone? And how can we get it ?
It is not available for mobile phones. Please check our Supported Hosts and System Requirements here: www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/supported-hosts
www.waves.com/support/tech-specs/system-requirements
Doesn't Clarity VX also get rid of hiss?
It gets rid of all types of noise
@@virgilhughes7837 that’s what I thought.
Ok but why are people recording with an AC on
Accidents happen
basically gates
No, gates don’t behave like this.
@@dancooperwaves3685 you re right , thank god that you replied cause i wouldve messed it up :)
Gates stops the noise when there is nothing but silence filed with noise , but these two remove the noise in the vocals .
This got old quickly when Clarity VX got released
Ns1 destroys the original signal.
Clarity vx and deverb does a better job at preserving the signal chain. I have all 3 plugins and I can definitely tell. I also have UAD CVOX and Clarity VX can easily compete against it, that's how good clarity vx is even against Izotope rx.
a very useful helper! thx
Whoa