Comics that ask "what if?" | Randall Munroe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 тра 2014
  • Web cartoonist Randall Munroe answers simple what-if questions ("what if you hit a baseball moving at the speed of light?") using math, physics, logic and deadpan humor. In this charming talk, a reader's question about Google's data warehouse leads Munroe down a circuitous path to a hilariously over-detailed answer - in which, shhh, you might actually learn something.
    TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and much more.
    Find closed captions and translated subtitles in many languages at www.ted.com/translate
    Follow TED news on Twitter: / tednews
    Like TED on Facebook: / ted
    Subscribe to our channel: / tedtalksdirector
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 577

  • @TQuast
    @TQuast 10 років тому +2731

    Randall Munroe: Cartoonist. Also, you know, ex-Nasa roboticist

    • @LordFokas
      @LordFokas 5 років тому +180

      Who learned more about orbital mechanics playing KSP than hanging out at NASA.

    • @timothymclean
      @timothymclean 5 років тому +172

      @@LordFokas To be fair, most people learn more about orbital mechanics playing KSP than anywhere else.

    • @federicoislab
      @federicoislab 4 роки тому +7

      Yeah, that ex made me think he was old.

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 4 роки тому +1

      @@timothymclean What is KSP?

    • @timothymclean
      @timothymclean 4 роки тому +33

      @@leif1075 Kerbal Space Program. It's a game that Randall Munroe has made a few comics about, including one where he attributes most of his understanding of orbital mechanics to the game.

  • @Fungamerplays
    @Fungamerplays 7 років тому +2508

    This guy is an internet legend

  • @SH4GN457Y
    @SH4GN457Y 7 років тому +1961

    Did Randall just get nerd-sniped by Google?

    • @jordananderson2728
      @jordananderson2728 5 років тому +143

      Ayup. They Randall'ed Randall.

    • @entropy7999
      @entropy7999 5 років тому +77

      did you just reference Randall to Randall about Randall?

    • @jordananderson2728
      @jordananderson2728 5 років тому +60

      @@entropy7999 it would appear so, yes. Now, back to my infinite resistors....

    • @felixvelariusbos
      @felixvelariusbos 4 роки тому +51

      @@tf2excession My favorite "What-If" is still "What if you had a mole (unit of measurement) of moles (small furry critters)"?

    • @EricRovelo
      @EricRovelo 4 роки тому +3

      @@jordananderson2728 I totally forgot about that!

  • @stenoch
    @stenoch 5 років тому +660

    "If people had wheels and could fly, how would we differentiate them from airlines?"
    When it stops flying, and is sitting on the ground on its wheels, go up to it and ask it, "Are you a person or an airplane?" If it answers, either way, odds are it's a person. If it ignores your question and starts vomiting luggage, it's probably an airplane.
    Hope that helps.

    • @roguishpaladin
      @roguishpaladin 4 роки тому +21

      There's enough text-to-voice apps that would allow you to have an airplane state that it is human, though, and a plane is not guaranteed to have luggage upon it. Nope, it'd have to be something more directly related to the definition of a plane.

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 Рік тому +32

      @@roguishpaladin but have you ever seen a person vomit luggage?

    • @himmelsdemon
      @himmelsdemon Рік тому +9

      Ah, the modified Harkness test.

    • @torn2867
      @torn2867 Рік тому +3

      Urgent

    • @rayfish4941
      @rayfish4941 Рік тому +4

      @@roguishpaladin Or more related to the definition of a human, which is Mr. Munroe's point I think.

  • @projectkilimanjaro223
    @projectkilimanjaro223 9 років тому +2469

    You gotta admit, Google's got style

    • @actsrv9
      @actsrv9 8 років тому +266

      Google's got multiple copies of everyone's style, in RAM, on disk and on tape :D

    • @sebc7758
      @sebc7758 6 років тому +2

      hear hear

    • @jobansand
      @jobansand 5 років тому +1

      Put you at 666 likes. So proud

    • @rudrasingh6354
      @rudrasingh6354 5 років тому +19

      Harry Potter Reference?

  • @harrisonfackrell
    @harrisonfackrell 5 років тому +355

    Having never seen Munroe's face before, I feel a little bit jarred being forced to think of him as anything other than Cueball from XKCD.

  • @siddyrock
    @siddyrock 10 років тому +576

    “Cartoonist”? Educator, rocket scientist, inspiration, take your pick, but xkcd is hardly a cartoon - it’s a work of art! I’ve never since seen stick figures with more emotion or personality than his :p

    • @seanwhitehall4652
      @seanwhitehall4652 4 роки тому +13

      Cartoons are art...

    • @Aquila009
      @Aquila009 4 роки тому +2

      Not as educational... but if you like emotional stick figures, look up Alan Becker on youtube.

  • @Slutuppnu
    @Slutuppnu 9 років тому +660

    The king of nerds. Only Munroe would have the idea to compare Google's data with the last glacial maximum.

    • @Macatho
      @Macatho 8 років тому +3

      +Slutuppnu Indeed, like that gives people more information :)

    • @jakew2897
      @jakew2897 8 років тому +8

      But what other physical object on Earth even compares to the punch cards? Unless he were to compare it to some other hypothetical mass, its pretty much the only thing :p

    • @Macatho
      @Macatho 8 років тому

      jake W Without googling it, tell me how much information a punch card contains? No? I rest my case.

    • @jakew2897
      @jakew2897 8 років тому +4

      Maximilian Wicén Presumably not very much considering the gargantuan size of Randall's punch card pile. I'm not sure if I'm understanding the point you're trying to make though

    • @Dakotaidk
      @Dakotaidk 7 років тому +3

      Maximilian Wicén it's in the video
      80 characters, 10 bytes

  • @dimitristavropoulos5458
    @dimitristavropoulos5458 6 років тому +882

    I thought Randall was black and white, with a very slim body, slim hands and legs and no face. The more you know

    • @bzqp2
      @bzqp2 4 роки тому +2

      Slenderman basically

    • @SoulOfTheReaver
      @SoulOfTheReaver 4 роки тому +11

      No no, you're thinking of CGPGrey

    • @hasanmuhammad6651
      @hasanmuhammad6651 3 роки тому +4

      @@SoulOfTheReaver you'd need glasses too

  • @CasualGraph
    @CasualGraph 9 років тому +1286

    My theory: one of the Google staff, an xkcd fan of course, saw the what if article and recognized the accuracy of the estimate. He then showed it around to his coworkers, fascinated, and it was then that they crafted their response. Indeed, their "no comment" says volumes, namely that he was close enough to the answer that they felt a need to dissuade him from such ponderings.

    • @rudrasingh6354
      @rudrasingh6354 5 років тому +29

      @@nickelchlorine2753 What have you put in my brain

    • @taitano12
      @taitano12 5 років тому +76

      @@rudrasingh6354 Truth... He put truth in your brain. Google is run by data addicted technowizards with the money to live a life of perpetual D&D LARPING, complete with thrones, lizards genetically modified into dragons and secretive meetings in arcane temples in remote forests and forgotten wildernesses.

    • @roguishpaladin
      @roguishpaladin 4 роки тому +13

      @@taitano12 You know, you'd think that, but the best LARPing in the nation so far as I can tell is up in the New England area, not in the Bay Area. If they're LARPing, they're not building out games here.

    • @ChipNRat
      @ChipNRat Рік тому +6

      @@roguishpaladin The "Board game capitol" of the world isn't in new england, nor in the bay area, but often in the relatively unexplored areas. For a long time, it was in Salt Lake City because of the weird contradictory ideas, combined with a lack of funding to hash them out.

    • @anandsharma7430
      @anandsharma7430 Рік тому +15

      You're right. "No comment" seems to lean more towards "we can neither confirm nor deny" than just denying any information. "Neither confirm nor deny" is usually understood to be "you got it right"

  • @kookwater456
    @kookwater456 2 роки тому +116

    Growing up, I saw a lot of xkcd comics printed on my university’s Mathematic department’s notice boards. Since then I have always liked xkcd. But hearing Randall Munroe going through his creative-thought process and depth research, I appreciate it so much more. This is beyond comics. This is philosophy.

  • @caseyhamm8822
    @caseyhamm8822 7 років тому +676

    Why can't I imagine this guy being THE GUY behind xkcd?

    • @jayjem8295
      @jayjem8295 7 років тому +9

      SAME

    • @ithuvanian
      @ithuvanian 7 років тому +99

      He doesn't look geeky enough.

    • @caseyhamm8822
      @caseyhamm8822 7 років тому +3

      ithuvanian I think that might be it...

    • @igrewold
      @igrewold 7 років тому +9

      Because you are thinking funny people can not be intelligent.
      When it is actually the other way around.

    • @jayjem8295
      @jayjem8295 7 років тому +30

      igrewold no, I just don't picture him like that, I thought of him as younger

  • @MartinsOkoi
    @MartinsOkoi 8 років тому +517

    This is Randall Monroe?? He's so smart. I read his book, What If, last year and enjoyed every bit of it. Big ups

    • @smalls1485
      @smalls1485 6 років тому +4

      Have you read his comics, they're really good.

    • @entropy7999
      @entropy7999 5 років тому +7

      I got some news for you @martins divine okoi in September his new book is being released called 'how to' and I believe it is a form of sequal that was teased in one chapter of what if? and I really hope it is. same style, more things. looks fun.

    • @nettart4924
      @nettart4924 4 роки тому +1

      Martins Divine Okoi same

    • @vibaj16
      @vibaj16 Рік тому +2

      @@entropy7999 have you heard that What If 2 exists now?

    • @entropy7999
      @entropy7999 Рік тому

      @@vibaj16 Already read it! Was a very fun read, though I did enjoy the first one a tad more.

  • @michaelzheng5250
    @michaelzheng5250 4 роки тому +186

    Just bought his new book “How to”, just like “What if” I have so far been enjoying it

    • @hibak8196
      @hibak8196 4 роки тому +2

      I'm reading How to as well, and it was my first introduction to him believe it or not. I'm loving it so much!

    • @piguyalamode164
      @piguyalamode164 4 роки тому +3

      Don't forget Thing Explainer

  • @kieransaul2711
    @kieransaul2711 8 років тому +232

    Google is both scary and awesome at the same time.

  • @rageagainstmyhairline5574
    @rageagainstmyhairline5574 4 роки тому +44

    You can tell he was nervous but he did a good job. Excellent payoff.

  • @brachypelmasmith
    @brachypelmasmith 5 років тому +117

    kids, i remember when what-if was a weekly series. ANd then a monthly. ANd then a yearly

    • @costley51
      @costley51 4 роки тому +2

      :'(

    • @ludicrous_gibbs
      @ludicrous_gibbs 4 роки тому +7

      oh you shush. he's ONE guy! he's been busy with his books, and touring. buy them! plenty of content contained within to provide the fix you're craving. sadly, i can't figure out how to get the mouse-over text to work, though. some of his stuff is going to need some advanced e-ink development before it fully translates well to print format.

  • @definesigint2823
    @definesigint2823 6 років тому +34

    0:30 - "...some calculations..." (Randall pauses so we can read the comic, then: Rising compulsion to mouse over for title text, barely resisted)

    • @appa609
      @appa609 5 років тому +1

      Kirk Schafer it's a what if. Doesn't have it.

    • @SuperGarryGamer
      @SuperGarryGamer 5 років тому +6

      What ifs do have mouse-over text

    • @appa609
      @appa609 5 років тому +2

      @@SuperGarryGamer Oh. Woah!

  • @Legiondude
    @Legiondude 10 років тому +241

    Google is such a troll

    • @BenPyman
      @BenPyman 10 років тому +73

      Google was nerd sniping.

    • @Apollys
      @Apollys 8 років тому

      +Ben Pyman Ahahah!

    • @danshakulawrence983
      @danshakulawrence983 7 років тому +1

      AquaPhoenix Productions tru

    • @danshakulawrence983
      @danshakulawrence983 7 років тому +8

      AquaPhoenix Productions but how cool is getting physical, exclusive content directly from Google's staff?

    • @lilynaughton6972
      @lilynaughton6972 7 років тому

      Yep.

  • @devonopdendries7722
    @devonopdendries7722 4 роки тому +70

    This was a treat to see pop up in my suggested videos. I've been a fan of XKCD for years and really hope he revives the "What If" portion of his website again. Really cool to actually see the person behind those amazing comics!

  • @RealHealthyMinute
    @RealHealthyMinute 7 років тому +158

    Those Google peeps trolled him pretty good...

    • @alt8791
      @alt8791 4 роки тому +4

      They should have included a link to rickroll him, given the amount of times xkcd mentions that.

  • @endermeap6488
    @endermeap6488 4 роки тому +30

    I love how this is just a less organized version of the what if book

  • @t.b.m.5718
    @t.b.m.5718 7 років тому +34

    I like how he just basically reverse engineer google without them getting mad.

  • @socearo
    @socearo 10 років тому +727

    I thought he was banned from TED

    • @Laughing_Chinaman
      @Laughing_Chinaman 10 років тому +58

      why would he be banned?

    • @DiogoVKersting
      @DiogoVKersting 10 років тому +60

      Zevti that was funny

    • @SH4GN457Y
      @SH4GN457Y 10 років тому +163

      I'm a bit upset that he didn't open with that.

    • @gwadpot
      @gwadpot 9 років тому +15

      155UR 5H4NK0V17CH Yeah...dang.

    • @Fralexion
      @Fralexion 9 років тому +76

      Zevti The solution, of course, is to use brackets: Linux (or BSD :]) would...

  • @CreightonMiller
    @CreightonMiller 10 років тому +753

    I shouldn't have watched this. It's messing with the xkcd narrative voice that I had going.

    • @Faith276
      @Faith276 5 років тому +1

      Creighton Miller TRUE

    • @illianderninebees
      @illianderninebees 5 років тому +11

      I'm not able to read XKCD the same way I always had...

    • @Alaerick1
      @Alaerick1 5 років тому +2

      Creighton Miller My version is the Will Wheaton what if audio book

    • @Anvilshock
      @Anvilshock 5 років тому +4

      I'm so glad that for me it ISN'T Wheaton.

    • @cheesybutler9544
      @cheesybutler9544 4 роки тому

      same

  • @ehtuanK
    @ehtuanK 10 років тому +65

    I almost awaiting him to talk about awkward combinations of parenthesis and emoticons...

  • @supranormal_
    @supranormal_ 10 років тому +62

    So that's how Randall looks like

    • @angel-ig
      @angel-ig 4 роки тому +4

      He's not a stickman and he's got a face

  • @Apollys
    @Apollys 8 років тому +169

    URGENT: If people had wheels and could fly, how could we distinguish them from airplanes?
    LOL

    • @chasey4634
      @chasey4634 8 років тому +8

      +Apollys I KNOW IT! People wear clothes! ^^

    • @squabungus7310
      @squabungus7310 8 років тому +2

      Best question

    • @Apollys
      @Apollys 8 років тому +2

      Chasey Not all people :)

    • @maxharrison3733
      @maxharrison3733 7 років тому +3

      Airplanes generate their own thrust, which must be enough to take off on their own.

    • @danieldriscoll2155
      @danieldriscoll2155 6 років тому +4

      Planes are made of metal, people are not

  • @bounana
    @bounana Рік тому +5

    I can't believe noone laughed at his pizza delivery joke XDD

  • @erenoz2910
    @erenoz2910 4 роки тому +57

    plot twist: google has like 5 people who memorised all its information and they just type them out in real time

    • @derianvandalsen
      @derianvandalsen 4 роки тому +2

      That would amount to about a similar storage capacity, if fully used...

  • @matthewcupelli5901
    @matthewcupelli5901 8 років тому +32

    I HAVE HIS BOOK AND JUST FOUND THIS TALK IM EXCITED

  • @froge4300
    @froge4300 Рік тому +5

    "i dont really like math for its own sake" this is SO TRUE
    even linear algebra can be fun if youre doing it in the context of graphics programming
    less so if youre doing it in school 💀💀💀

  • @andy4an
    @andy4an 10 років тому +48

    love this guy. his what-if series is stellar, and I eagerly anticipate each tuesday's submission.

    • @Zimpfnis
      @Zimpfnis 5 років тому

      I wish it were each Tuesday. Feels like once a quarter nowadays

    • @proot.
      @proot. 5 років тому +1

      @@Zimpfnis The rate is decreasing greatly. There were 4 in 2017, only 2 in 2018.

  • @TroyVan6654
    @TroyVan6654 5 років тому +13

    2:20 No HBP because the batter didn't try to avoid getting hit. It would be a strike, because some (disintegrated) part of the ball would pass through the strike zone.

    • @roguishpaladin
      @roguishpaladin 4 роки тому +2

      But "If the ball is outside the strike zone when it touches the batter, it shall be called a ball if he makes no attempt to avoid being touched." Since this is also true, then...I guess it's a ball and a strike? I think the doctoring the ball rule might come into effect, though. By the mere act of throwing, the pitcher is intentionally damaging the ball and is thus ejected.

    • @TroyVan6654
      @TroyVan6654 4 роки тому +1

      @@roguishpaladin My interpretation is that if any part of the ball is in the strike zone, the ball is considered in the strike zone.
      This does raise a question of what happens if a ball touches the batter while some part of it is in the strike zone, but the point of touching is outside the strike zone. The strict letter of the definition of a strike in this situation - "[t]ouches the batter in flight in the strike zone" - suggests that the point of touching must be in the strike zone to considered a strike. In this case, if it is not a hit by pitch, it would be neither a ball nor a strike.
      Another question arises when a pitch enters and exits the strike zone, and then hits the batter. It would be a strike under clause (b) of the definition of a strike ("[i]s not struck at, if any part of the ball passes through any part
      of the strike zone"); but the ball is not in the strike zone when it hit the batter, and rule 5.05(b)(2) says that's a ball.

    • @TroyVan6654
      @TroyVan6654 4 роки тому +1

      @@roguishpaladin Also, the "doctoring the ball" rules - 6.02(c)(1) through (5) - don't apply to throwing the ball.

  • @mattw7949
    @mattw7949 Рік тому +3

    "... so this is impractical. " Love this guy.

  • @pietrocelano23
    @pietrocelano23 8 років тому +52

    HE DIDNT ASK THE (...:)) VS (...:)!

  • @CerealLover56
    @CerealLover56 10 років тому +6

    I absolutely love Randall Munroe.

  • @Sanguimaru
    @Sanguimaru 4 роки тому +3

    I was immediately confused when I saw him, because I was expecting a hat.

  • @davidmartin5145
    @davidmartin5145 Рік тому +2

    I’ve been reading XKCD for over a decade, how is it possible I didn’t know this video existed?

  • @manuelfriend4060
    @manuelfriend4060 6 місяців тому +1

    Hahaaaa. Whichever employee is responsible for those punch cards is a legend.

  • @ProcessLoveCandy
    @ProcessLoveCandy 2 місяці тому

    That was so brilliant. The best TED Talk I've seen in a while.

  • @josephdaniel1999
    @josephdaniel1999 10 років тому +1

    This might be one of the best TED talks of the year for me.

  • @shikamarunara8920
    @shikamarunara8920 5 років тому +6

    I immediately added this to my favourites around 1:37 after i had my mind blown a couple of times...paused ...writing this and i cant wait to watch the rest. ...i leave a like most of the times let alone i have subscribed a long time ago...but this video is really something and i hope i can learn something that i can use as a game designer one day

  • @jarodwilfrid8505
    @jarodwilfrid8505 9 років тому +77

    Wasn't he banned? He must have sneaked in...

    • @heatherrockwell9012
      @heatherrockwell9012 8 років тому +3

      Yeah. But he never got his question answered....

    • @jarodwilfrid8505
      @jarodwilfrid8505 8 років тому +9

      Which was? (I can't remember:-)

    • @nooblangpoo
      @nooblangpoo 7 років тому +9

      Jarod Obando I guess they'd let him in after a promise of no graphs.

    • @proot.
      @proot. 5 років тому

      @@jarodwilfrid8505 How to end a parenthetical with emoticons.

    • @angel-ig
      @angel-ig 4 роки тому +1

      @@proot. He said "... (I can't remember :) " (so he knew it :))

  • @kaykap7
    @kaykap7 9 років тому +3

    I am totally in love with him! Reading his book makes me realize we should be BFFs.

  • @CrySmore
    @CrySmore Рік тому +5

    Glad to see he is no longer banned from TED after the “Emoticons in parentheses” incident.

  • @Blue_Lan_blue
    @Blue_Lan_blue 8 років тому +14

    He should get a ig Nobel prize!!!

  • @playgroundchooser
    @playgroundchooser 4 роки тому +4

    I've been reading XKCD for years now... and I've never seen Randall's face! 😄

  • @eternity9691
    @eternity9691 4 роки тому +3

    He's amazing !!!! Getting the book just now. Sending so much love nerd royalty !!!! 🌸♥️🌸♥️🌸♥️🌸🌠🌸🌠🌸🌠🌸🌠🌸🌸🌠

  • @thizzicality
    @thizzicality 8 років тому

    the first example was best, awesome video!

  • @joeyespinosa8324
    @joeyespinosa8324 10 років тому

    I love this guy's website!! Been following it for a while now.

  • @alt8791
    @alt8791 4 роки тому +3

    xkcd is the only way I bear having religion class. Thank you so much Randall!!!

  • @TheCubicalGuy
    @TheCubicalGuy 4 роки тому +11

    I've known about xkcd for years, own all three of his written books (or his first three), but this is the first time I've ever seen him or heard his voice. I never realized that I'd be able to, but I'm kinda sad it's in a video of answers I already know.

  • @mmmk1616
    @mmmk1616 4 роки тому

    Love his stuff, love this talk!

  • @kaladinstormblessed5308
    @kaladinstormblessed5308 10 років тому +3

    Randall Munroe is one of the two people online who I would donate money to.

  • @LIOTBs
    @LIOTBs 4 місяці тому

    This is one of my all time favorites!

  • @straef1042
    @straef1042 5 років тому

    Loved his book. Same goes for this video.

  • @Gliitch88
    @Gliitch88 4 роки тому +1

    Randall is simply the best

  • @JamieMartin
    @JamieMartin 10 років тому +2

    Nice talk. Always entertaining.

  • @loe7365
    @loe7365 4 роки тому +1

    Damn I'm glad UA-cam recommended me this, I love the book and know every question n answer

  • @lordoftheducks332
    @lordoftheducks332 4 роки тому +2

    I read this guy’s book, and it’s honestly great. I saw the name and instantly clicked

  • @Forriedude
    @Forriedude 4 роки тому +2

    I read XKCD three times a week! Didn't know you had a TED talk.

  • @martyshwaartz971
    @martyshwaartz971 7 років тому +5

    THIS IS THE GUY THAT WROTE THE GREATEST BOOK OF ALL TIME

    • @nishantak911
      @nishantak911 4 роки тому +1

      He didn't write the Bible

    • @vladimirjosh6575
      @vladimirjosh6575 4 роки тому +2

      @@nishantak911 You're the one who's written the greatest comment of all time!

  • @lost_boy
    @lost_boy Рік тому

    Easily the best ted talk out there.

  • @amodgawade4323
    @amodgawade4323 4 роки тому +3

    i just pre-ordered his book "How To" omg i can't wait for it to ship. this guy is awesome!! I bought his other two books as well, and they are lit.

    • @amodgawade4323
      @amodgawade4323 4 роки тому +3

      GUYS THE BOOK JUST REACHED Oh my gosh ! ! IM SO HAPPYYYY

  • @justalurkr
    @justalurkr 4 роки тому +5

    Reminder to self: he. Is. MARRIED.
    Self: still smart. Hot. FUNNY.

  • @Krommandant
    @Krommandant 5 років тому +3

    "No comment" made me laugh out loud. Good one Google!

  • @definitelynotninaa
    @definitelynotninaa 7 років тому +1

    I LOVE this book!

  • @salmaN-yv4zb
    @salmaN-yv4zb 8 років тому +1

    A great mind! So glad I bought his book What if

  • @nickryckx7817
    @nickryckx7817 12 днів тому

    Dude takes Fermi estimations to a whole new level!

  • @jaxnean2663
    @jaxnean2663 7 років тому

    Totally love his book

  • @kaushaltimilsina7727
    @kaushaltimilsina7727 5 років тому +4

    Such an incredible person! Wow! Making education as - learning and not just knowing something and inspiring and motivating the excitement to learn together: this is education. Wow!

  • @emmarounsville1479
    @emmarounsville1479 5 років тому +1

    RANDALL MUNROE??? THIS GUY'S MY HERO!!!!

  • @woojinyoon107
    @woojinyoon107 5 років тому

    His book, What If, is unique and awesome! That's why I like him!!

  • @Felipemelazzi
    @Felipemelazzi 4 роки тому

    I must have watched this 4 times in my life

  • @melkerart1793
    @melkerart1793 5 років тому

    The world would be a colder place without guys like Randall Munroe.

  • @martijnvanweele6204
    @martijnvanweele6204 5 років тому

    I love that Randall Munroe and Henry Reich actually teamed up at one point...

  • @mrsynical8725
    @mrsynical8725 Рік тому

    Thank you Randall

  • @KarnKaul
    @KarnKaul 10 років тому

    This was an unexpected surprise! xkcd was literally the first webcomic I'd discovered!

  • @vull8375
    @vull8375 4 роки тому

    There he is, the man, the myth, the legend.

  • @TheMrCarnification
    @TheMrCarnification 10 років тому

    Amazing.

  • @nemecsek69
    @nemecsek69 4 роки тому +1

    To split apart people and airplanes, try to refuel. If they scream, it's people.

  • @adityabanka_iso
    @adityabanka_iso 3 роки тому +1

    Internet's nuclear scientist in creating logically sound and mathematically correct memes😂

  • @giornogiovanna2614
    @giornogiovanna2614 4 роки тому

    thank you youtube recomendations !!!!

  • @traisjames2
    @traisjames2 4 роки тому

    Wish he still did these.

  • @myjessicajourney1915
    @myjessicajourney1915 2 роки тому +1

    One time I calculated the amount of water the leaking faucet in my dorm room wasted in the week it took for maintenance to fix it and that was about where I peaked in life.

  • @waverlycinense9666
    @waverlycinense9666 6 років тому +2

    Isn't it crazy that someone could destroy an empire by pitching a ball at just 90% light speed?

  • @davidryder3374
    @davidryder3374 6 місяців тому +2

    I have to say, while I love What If and XKCD and would support anything Randall wants to do, I'm finding his live talks and What If UA-cam videos less fun than the actual comic. I think the comic timing of the drawings hits harder and, unless you want to freeze the video constantly, it's hard to appreciate the simple elegance of his drawing style, which often adds to the humor.

  • @jaredloveless
    @jaredloveless 4 роки тому

    great work! a smidge more of an introduction would be nice.

  • @dmacmcmanus95
    @dmacmcmanus95 8 років тому +8

    Love that jacket

  • @fredpim11
    @fredpim11 3 роки тому

    merci infiniment pour ce travail de traduction

  • @dawnlee7720
    @dawnlee7720 5 років тому +1

    Ahahahaha!! I like Google's sense of humour. X-D And this dude's too.

  • @DAVIDSDIEGO
    @DAVIDSDIEGO 10 років тому

    Great insight from the XKCD guy.

  • @craftychrystal7913
    @craftychrystal7913 4 роки тому

    On that last question.... Make it 'wings' instead of 'wheels' and --- Size ( even really big people are smaller than the smallest plane), speed (presumably not fast enough to start losing articles of clothing, but fast enough to get lift), cruising height above ground (the need to breath is a real limiter) lack of ability to show up on radar (unless they can pick up birds too then refer back to size), length of runway needed to land and take off ( if we had vertical capability, they would notice the lack of rotors on top), and so on... Or we could look at it from the way it was asked....They could tell at a glance that you had no registration numbers printed on your side and there for were not registered as a plane. Probably had no submitted flight plan, and therefore would probably end up crashing into other unregistered, flyers. Then the lack of burning and exploding on impact would probably be a dead give-away. Thank you very much! LOL

  • @rslashontario
    @rslashontario 3 місяці тому +1

    this guy has the dedication of a journalist just to draw comics for random dudes on the internet ._.

  • @whoisj
    @whoisj 5 місяців тому +1

    hero to a generation (or two)

  • @thehater4053
    @thehater4053 7 років тому

    This guy is my motivational hero

  • @mollypike9887
    @mollypike9887 4 роки тому

    My mum bought me his book some years ago, it was amazing!!!

  • @blastocat4966
    @blastocat4966 6 років тому

    The book was amazing

  • @queuesnake704
    @queuesnake704 10 років тому

    Awesome.