I really like the 2019 one too it’s a little longer and it has a nice new look with a different colour and more detail with better pieces! The only thing about the new one I don’t like is the price but that doesn’t matter too much
The new one is by far the best and most accurate! Btw the Turrets on the 2019 one are accurate to the studio model that they use, it being a MK 1 it's supposed to have those beefy ones while the MK 2 are the one with the octuplet turrets.
Holly Dinsmore when I was about 6 my cousin proved this wrong when he tried to pick it up. My UCS Star Destroyer swooshed quite capably for a solid half second before disintegrating against my bedroom floor
Just finished building the 2019 one less than an hour ago and I must say it’s one of the best Lego Star Wars sets I’ve built in my life, if not the actual best. What an absolute beauty.
Fabi I know you’re asking him, but I own it as well, and I have it displayed on a stand in my living room, actually a really nice display item, good for a conversation starter
Yes you have to be the only one. It's not like they literaly are different colors, say light gray and light bluish gray. No one would ever notice. Only you did
He already has.... One is called design and the other is called playability. One thing I have learned by watching lego masters is that playability = stability. Mandrproductions does unfortunately not understand that and instead count stability as "design"....
@Jacob Beal I'm sure there are a few minor differences, but they look pretty much the same to most people. They could have included a few extra bits to modify the set to look like the one in Empire, like how the UCS Falcon has two satellite dishes.
I spent a chunk of my weekend rebuilding the 2002 set that my brother had kepts in a box in his garage. It was a good time. While the new one does look great and is an improvement in many ways, I would like to point out that it's also made almost two decades later. For it's time the 2002 set was amazing, and still looks pretty damn good.
I like both but the 2002 design looks better to me more like lego. These people review sets like they’re supposed to look lifelike. The more dull grey gives it original trilogy vibes which i love.
@@shadowxxe No Lego set can look life like and true to the original. For example Lego can not do complex color schemes and fine details. There is always a compromise. Lego tend to look better when it is approximate instead of trying to squeeze a round peg in a square hole.
I would’ve given Playability to the 2019 one instead of it being a draw, since not only do you get minifigures but you can also dock the Tantive IV underneath, not to mention also having a mini Tie Fighter, whereas the 2002 one only has a blank space with nothing going on. It’s not much, but I think it’s a large enough advantage to give the nod to 2019.
They made one like this. It came with Chancellor Palpatine, two of his personal Senate Guards, and a couple of clone troopers. It even works to scale, since a Venator was smaller than an Imperial Star Destroyer. It costs the same as that old Destroyer did back in the day. Just look up Lego Republic Cruiser, and you'll find it.
"its $700 and a lot of people have something to say abut that but it DOES come with two mini figures and a display plaque." oh why didnt you say so before? 2 mini figures and a DISPLAY plaque?! so worth it. that thing should honestly be something like 200-400. it doesnt even come with a bunch of stormtroopers of darth vader or the emperor
I'm happy I have two hands because I already ordered the ship before watching the video. My two hands should make the building process a bit easier too.
I think the communication thing with the hinge helps you make either an ISD 1 or 2. The first one has that raised communication thing, while ISD 2 has a flat bar. I don’t think that they can really swivel in Star Wars but I think it just helps you make a 1 or 2
The old one's turrets do look like those of an ISD-2 but the bridge tower is definitely for an ISD-1 and both of them are supposed to be the Devastator which was an ISD-1.
it’s actually extremely simple to take of the other big sections next to the bridge on the 2019. you don’t have to mess with technic at all the just slide in very easy. i was confused why he kept saying it would be hard to do. they are easy to take off, making the model easy to pick up, at its center of gravity.
I like the 2019 version more overall but I prefer the smaller details of the 2002 model (like the asteroid pieces for shield domes, the tires for the engines, etc). The reason why I like that more is because it's obviously made of LEGO bricks no matter what you do, but the 2002 version really feels like a LEGO star destroyer because of those odd parts being thrown in and used for things they obviously weren't originally meant for. It find new ways to use old parts and I really like that aesthetic, that's how LEGO should be imo. Or maybe I'm the weird one. I haven't really been "into" LEGO for 15 years now, but back when I played with them the list of bricks was pretty small. They added new pieces here and there, of course, but for the most part new pieces only came out if they really didn't have anything that could be repurposed. And I think that was the real fun of LEGO, not just building the sets but getting new sets and being all "Oh, I never thought of using X piece as a Y instead!" and then taking it apart, adding it to my already existing collection and coming up with something completely new. The aesthetic of the 2002 star destroyer really appeals to that sense of creativity and imagination. I feel like the 2019 one, on the other hand, appeals more to the second type of LEGO enthusiast: The kind who builds a set and then just... displays it. They put it together and that's that, as if it were a model that wasn't meant to ever come apart again. Which is a fine hobby to have, but I feel like that really misses the point of LEGO. The 2019 star destroyer looks more accurate, and at the same time I feel like that makes it look more boring. I do have to give the 2019 version credit for using the door pieces in the "communications radar" though, that's pretty neat.
I did not realize the secondary engines were identical in shape (parts) between both sets. I really like how LEGO tried to emulate the actual movie set model in size and function with the 2019 set.
playability should go to the 2019 model because you can recreate the scene of the tantive IV being docked where its is literally a gaping hole there on the 2002 model. You also have much more (and more stable) movement of the side cannons on the newer one as opposed to the old one. I always love watching your content and cant wait for the full millennium falcon comparison!
I don't know how you can do a value comparison. It's completely unrealistic that you can purchase a 2002 edition at $300 or whatever it cost. Lego prices are ridiculous for vintage sets. I admire your disposable income.
I absolutely love them. I've been waiting years for a lieutenant figure (up until 2012 they were all captains). Still, I agree that a few more figures would have been nice. Vader, maybe Leia, and a stormtrooper/navy trooper would have really helped to increase the value.
I just got the 2019 destroyer last week. Loved the entire build process and it looks so menacing in my room. In terms of carrying, I actually found that removing the entire bridge area (not the bridge itself but all the stuff under it, and then lifting with two hands from the middle white section of the inner skeleton was the best way for me to move it. I wouldn't hold it from the bottom. Great review of both! Next on my list is to rebuild the original 2006 Star Destroyer. And then the Death Star!
17:34 The Gap: I am inevitable... On a side note, look at sooo many star destroyer MOCs to realise that you can hide the gap. But I get it would add pieces and raise the price (as if it wasn't high enough), but I reckon they could have tried. At least that would start making the £650 look more tolerable...
I found a complete disassembled 10030 at a yard sale last summer for $15 lol. No box, they had all the parts stuffed in big zip lock bags. Best find of the year.
I live at home, have one bedroom to work with, and already have Lego Star Wars sets on every shelf on every wall of my room. Yet I ordered this anyway and it will be here in a few days...
These both are the ISD1 Devastator becouse of the Tantive IV but the 2002 version is narrower, making it look like an ISD2. And in the 2019 version you can lower the antenna, a feature thats only in the ISD2 even though they both are the same ISD1 Devastator.
If only they made a Lego set on Admiral Thrawn's star destroyer. And also the Imperial II Star Destroyer, the Acclamator, the Victory, Providence, Munificent, Recusant, Malevolence, Arquitens and also the Harrower class Dreadnought in it's early form as UCS sets. Also forgot to include the Consular in it's Diplomatic red look and clone wars look as a UCS set.
On the newer version, at 18:36, that small bay is actually an Officers docking bay. It's ment for officers, VIPs and the dark lord himself. Fun fact...
Noah Maldonado hopefully they do because the UCS SSD is pretty overrated and bad as a UCS set because LEGO didn’t even bother to do detail on the bottom side of the ship and decided to make it completely flat for a half-assed interior
Growing up my parents wouldn't even buy me a $10 Lego lol I had 0 Lego products growing up. Now I'm 28 have my own money and spend $2000 at the Lego store within 2 months lol I got my first Lego set at like 24 years old lpl
@@geniusatwork12 Yeah man, I just bought a brand new home last year and have a room where I still start putting my collections. Room is empty right now but little by little it will take shape.
I'm planning to get the 2019 in the next week or two so I've got it before it gets retired, issue is going to be finding a spot in my room to display. Especially since the UCS Falcon is taking up a bit of space.
No contest between the tantive IV, 2002 has it hands down. Such a classic-and yea, the new one does try to get too cute with fancy techniques, the nose looks terrible on the new one. While I plan on getting the new one for a fleet, I’m not worried about it outshining the original. 2002 ucs star destroyer is gonna go down as the best ucs of all time-it set the standard back in the day and the new one owes everything it has to the original.
I have the 2002, post build, I wound up adding about 2500 additional pieces to reinforce and add greeble/finish. Out of the box, the frame tends to split and warp, unless you add more braces. The docking bay is just a hole. There's no reactor bulge underneath. The interior was SCREAMING for at least a diorama. If they want me to shell out an extra 400 bucks for the new one, they'd have to do a lot better.
I have looked at it for a long time and I wanted to buy 1 last Lego set before I’ll stop buying it for me, 1 last time to be a child again. You were the last straw, and I will buy it tomorrow. Thank you!
Seeing your sets in the background makes me so jealous. I only have one bedroom to keep my entire collection in, and every time I get a new big ship I have to rearrange the entire room around it. Because of this, and obviously money too, I've missed out on so many amazing UCS sets. I do have a 2019 Star Destroyer on its way here, but I'll likely have no room left at all once I display it.
Nostalgia overload, thank you for comparing the two side by side. I thought they were the same but now see they’re very different. I was 11 when my crazy dad bought the 2002 version during 2006. Finally finished after like 3 days. Tried to move it and it just exploded. Ended up super gluing it back together.. what a mess. The Star Destroyer II was a lot better design wise.
Honestly in love with the 2019 model! What do y'all think?
I really like the 2019 one too it’s a little longer and it has a nice new look with a different colour and more detail with better pieces! The only thing about the new one I don’t like is the price but that doesn’t matter too much
It’s impossible to say with a straight face “I like the 2002 star destroyer better
I’d say it’s perfect
U need to lift bro
The new one is by far the best and most accurate!
Btw the Turrets on the 2019 one are accurate to the studio model that they use, it being a MK 1 it's supposed to have those beefy ones while the MK 2 are the one with the octuplet turrets.
This is getting out of hand! Now there are two of them!
I’m the 100th like :3
And a few Millennium Falcons. :3
Retreat its a trap!
A Person after seeing the movie it’s like the Death Star never happened
In the new movie there is like a hundred of them
“With the star destroyers there’s no swoosh ability”
I beg to differ...
R/swoosh
Holly Dinsmore when I was about 6 my cousin proved this wrong when he tried to pick it up. My UCS Star Destroyer swooshed quite capably for a solid half second before disintegrating against my bedroom floor
*swooshability
KiLl3R Mem3StAR please tell me you were able to rebuild it
Now find a shield gate and crash them into each other.
rouge one
And a hammer head corvette
@@domb7788 And maybe glue or some inventive
building techniques to get it to stick? Maybe a stand?
@@domb7788 how about a fist?
With the tantive IV as the hammerhead corvette
Just finished building the 2019 one less than an hour ago and I must say it’s one of the best Lego Star Wars sets I’ve built in my life, if not the actual best. What an absolute beauty.
Just a question. If I may ask. Where do you "display" this set? Do you have a separate room just for it? Since it looks pretty big.
Fabi I know you’re asking him, but I own it as well, and I have it displayed on a stand in my living room, actually a really nice display item, good for a conversation starter
@@problemchild3610 That's the ultimate fan experience :D That's how things should be!
How long did it take to build
@@fredoran hi :) mine took me 2 weeks to build but I was spacing it out a bit
The 2019 one is obviously better for display, but the old one was better for price.
@Thedwarvenpower but back when they were released they definitely didnt cost 2k
Search the 2002 ucs star destroyer fon Ebay and it is usually 500 used
Agreed but I don’t like how he made it a draw.
@Palpatine definitely not
I found one used for 100 which was such a steal
Why not both?
$1,130+
Oh! Fair enough
Kitbash the two of them together
@@legofanzach It's more like the actual price of the oldest one xD
@@theo9052 yep it's gone down in value gonna try to get it in 2 years when I have $2000+ USD to spend on it
Most important thing I learned form this vid
12 lbs ≠ 1 ton
Did you think that it did?
lol same
You're 12
@@bostyt50 lol, I'm 17 but ok
Americans🤦♂️🤦♂️
Am I the only one who thinks the best difference is the colour?
Plastic decolours over time. That old star destroyer probably had the same colour as the new one
A Seyed that was the color of grey for old LEGO pieces, the newer ones have a hint of blue in them
Ich schaue, wo ich gefragt habe
Yes you have to be the only one. It's not like they literaly are different colors, say light gray and light bluish gray. No one would ever notice. Only you did
No I agree with you it's way better looking than the old one with colors
I think you should split design into two categories: looks and stability
It's not really a fair comparison since the older one is almost 20 years old... obviously it ain't gonna hold like it did when it was new
He already has.... One is called design and the other is called playability. One thing I have learned by watching lego masters is that playability = stability. Mandrproductions does unfortunately not understand that and instead count stability as "design"....
I'm suprised there was no mini Falcon to attach to the back of the star destroyer like it did in TESB.
@Jacob Beal I know, but still.
@Jacob Beal I'm sure there are a few minor differences, but they look pretty much the same to most people. They could have included a few extra bits to modify the set to look like the one in Empire, like how the UCS Falcon has two satellite dishes.
It was in A New Hope
Cloo Viewer the Empire Strikes Back Star destroyer Avenger is an ISD II, devastator from A New Hope is ISD I
I know it was a new hope star destroyer, but on the 2019 model you could bend back the Comms tower and it looks like the isd 2
I spent a chunk of my weekend rebuilding the 2002 set that my brother had kepts in a box in his garage. It was a good time. While the new one does look great and is an improvement in many ways, I would like to point out that it's also made almost two decades later. For it's time the 2002 set was amazing, and still looks pretty damn good.
I like both but the 2002 design looks better to me more like lego. These people review sets like they’re supposed to look lifelike. The more dull grey gives it original trilogy vibes which i love.
@@lethalassassin1754 its a UCS set its supposed to look life-like and true to the orginal. if it was a normal lego play set sure but its not
@@shadowxxe No Lego set can look life like and true to the original. For example Lego can not do complex color schemes and fine details. There is always a compromise. Lego tend to look better when it is approximate instead of trying to squeeze a round peg in a square hole.
I would’ve given Playability to the 2019 one instead of it being a draw, since not only do you get minifigures but you can also dock the Tantive IV underneath, not to mention also having a mini Tie Fighter, whereas the 2002 one only has a blank space with nothing going on. It’s not much, but I think it’s a large enough advantage to give the nod to 2019.
One thing I'm always concerned about with my Lego sets is their swooshability.
Same. If it don't swoosh, it don't matter,
Your not meant to be able to “play” with a ucs
@@wzl717 you are ment to get a joke
@@wzl717 thats the joke bro 💀
@@nicksade5154 it’s not very funny
“Swooshability” needs to be a new category for airplanes and flying ships
Thats basically playability
I want a venator class ship like this.
drfrenchfry I would buy that
Make one, lad.
They made one like this. It came with Chancellor Palpatine, two of his personal Senate Guards, and a couple of clone troopers. It even works to scale, since a Venator was smaller than an Imperial Star Destroyer. It costs the same as that old Destroyer did back in the day. Just look up Lego Republic Cruiser, and you'll find it.
Rook/CapColdblood are you talking about the one from lepin?
Your dream has come to fruition
Respect for Cory just sitting quietly in the background. He’s very polite
"its $700 and a lot of people have something to say abut that but it DOES come with two mini figures and a display plaque." oh why didnt you say so before? 2 mini figures and a DISPLAY plaque?! so worth it. that thing should honestly be something like 200-400. it doesnt even come with a bunch of stormtroopers of darth vader or the emperor
shust it has over 4,000 pieces. What so you think your playing for.
@@commonavionics6069 its plastic, 4000 pieces of plastic that definitely cost them near nothing to produce
shust your also paying for the Star Wars name and also the designing of the LEGO because something like this isn’t made in a afternoon.
$1200 is a fair price, it has big plate pieces which are expensive for lego to make
its not only plastic, but the designers time, creativity, etc.
I love how much Lego sets have really improved over the years
Girls: Boys never truly love something
Boys: Hold my Star Destroyers
Reminds me of this one image I saw where a man is in bed with his star destroyer and his wife/gf is on the floor.
@@Zeqweery what a true chad
M&R: *talking about 2 deadly ships that can kill anything in seconds..*
Cory: *building a gingerbread house*
Hmm a good video you have done, young one. Strong with the force you are
Yes Master Yoda. You are correct.
Black tar heroin I took, die I I roll over on my side I will
Master Yoda subscribed to you, I have don’t worry no seagulls, I have
@@clonetrooper8428 A clone you are. Betrayed us you have. (lightsaber ignite sound) terminated you must be
Yoda talk would be more like "good video you have done"
Do you guys see me in the background
Btw I’m corey
Yep
Hi Corey!
CoreYT hi Corey
hi corey
Star destroyers are some of the COOLEST spaceships in all of fiction, you cannot change my mind
I think they’re really cool! I personally enjoy Venator Star Destroyer more.
The star destroyers and super star destroyers are the goats
WAIT! ON THE COMMAND BRIDGE THE RADAR CAN MOVE, SO WOULD THAT MEAN THAT THE 2019 HAS MORE PLIABILITY?!?!
@Nikolai Belinski That is true, but its just now shown in the movies
*not
But you can put the tantive 4 in the hangar of the older one
17:15 one handed person has left the chat
I'm happy I have two hands because I already ordered the ship before watching the video. My two hands should make the building process a bit easier too.
@@ShizuruNakatsu ļlol
@@ShizuruNakatsu laughs in Count Dooku
@@sicksadworld765 He'll have a hard time laughing without a head.
Honestly the color on the newer model just looks a lot better than the older model.
The older version looks like that because of sun damage
@@thegreatpiginthesky3904 I don't think it's because of sun damage Ryan very recently built that
@Preston Varner Thank you so much
@Preston Varner I'd recommend buying the UCS Y wing on amazon it's still sold at its original price of $200
@Preston Varner try one of the rc tracked racers
I think the communication thing with the hinge helps you make either an ISD 1 or 2. The first one has that raised communication thing, while ISD 2 has a flat bar. I don’t think that they can really swivel in Star Wars but I think it just helps you make a 1 or 2
I wish lego sets weren't so expensive otherwise i would have everything and be more tempted to buy them
The ships are like me, grey on the outside but colorful and hollow on the inside xD
A Super Star Destroyer at the same scale would be a little more than 33 feet long.
Something to note:
2002 is an Imperial II-class, while 2019 is an Imperial I-class.
wrong both are ISD-1
The old one's turrets do look like those of an ISD-2 but the bridge tower is definitely for an ISD-1 and both of them are supposed to be the Devastator which was an ISD-1.
Thanos=Inevitable Gap=Inevitable The gap is secretly Thanos.
Do a comparison video between the 2006 Star Destroyer and the 2014 Star Destroyer
Don’t have the 2014 one yet
MandRproductions oh.........neither do I
@@MandRproductions the 2014 is a really good pickup, one of my favorites that I personally have 👍
@@trevorconnatser6161 stop bragging
Jennifer Gibson he wasn’t even bragging
Something tells me this is gonna have over a million views one day
2019 star destroyer: I have the high ground!
it’s actually extremely simple to take of the other big sections next to the bridge on the 2019. you don’t have to mess with technic at all the just slide in very easy. i was confused why he kept saying it would be hard to do. they are easy to take off, making the model easy to pick up, at its center of gravity.
"no swooshabillity" - MandRproductions 2019
You could have both and just refer to the 2002 version as a different ship in the fleet.
And I think the 2019 tantive v looks more accurate.
The small pod that hyperspeed-rammed both of those ships down the middle sure was powerful.
I like the 2019 version more overall but I prefer the smaller details of the 2002 model (like the asteroid pieces for shield domes, the tires for the engines, etc). The reason why I like that more is because it's obviously made of LEGO bricks no matter what you do, but the 2002 version really feels like a LEGO star destroyer because of those odd parts being thrown in and used for things they obviously weren't originally meant for. It find new ways to use old parts and I really like that aesthetic, that's how LEGO should be imo.
Or maybe I'm the weird one. I haven't really been "into" LEGO for 15 years now, but back when I played with them the list of bricks was pretty small. They added new pieces here and there, of course, but for the most part new pieces only came out if they really didn't have anything that could be repurposed. And I think that was the real fun of LEGO, not just building the sets but getting new sets and being all "Oh, I never thought of using X piece as a Y instead!" and then taking it apart, adding it to my already existing collection and coming up with something completely new. The aesthetic of the 2002 star destroyer really appeals to that sense of creativity and imagination.
I feel like the 2019 one, on the other hand, appeals more to the second type of LEGO enthusiast: The kind who builds a set and then just... displays it. They put it together and that's that, as if it were a model that wasn't meant to ever come apart again. Which is a fine hobby to have, but I feel like that really misses the point of LEGO. The 2019 star destroyer looks more accurate, and at the same time I feel like that makes it look more boring.
I do have to give the 2019 version credit for using the door pieces in the "communications radar" though, that's pretty neat.
LLLOOOONNGGGGGEEESSSSSSTTTTT CCCOOOMMMMEEENNTTT EEEVVVVEEERRRR
Just bought my own 2019 UCS IISD this weekend. What a blast it is to build! Absolutely magnificent.
"there is no swooshability"
I did not realize the secondary engines were identical in shape (parts) between both sets.
I really like how LEGO tried to emulate the actual movie set model in size and function with the 2019 set.
playability should go to the 2019 model because you can recreate the scene of the tantive IV being docked where its is literally a gaping hole there on the 2002 model. You also have much more (and more stable) movement of the side cannons on the newer one as opposed to the old one. I always love watching your content and cant wait for the full millennium falcon comparison!
"Swooshability" 10/10 commentary
I don't know how you can do a value comparison. It's completely unrealistic that you can purchase a 2002 edition at $300 or whatever it cost. Lego prices are ridiculous for vintage sets. I admire your disposable income.
was trying to see a good view of the Gap on a finished one (I am building mine now), so thank you SO much for taking time to review that part.
Take a drink every time he says “toss up”
You will not make it to the end.
"Star destroyers are big gray triangles," Ryan, I could not agree more.
Am i the only one who likes imperial officers
Just asking
They're cool but if they replaced one with Darth Vader it would be better
The figures are good, but it's a UCS set. We either need better figures or more of those figures.
The airm printing is nice
I absolutely love them. I've been waiting years for a lieutenant figure (up until 2012 they were all captains). Still, I agree that a few more figures would have been nice. Vader, maybe Leia, and a stormtrooper/navy trooper would have really helped to increase the value.
Good for mocs :/
I just got the 2019 destroyer last week. Loved the entire build process and it looks so menacing in my room. In terms of carrying, I actually found that removing the entire bridge area (not the bridge itself but all the stuff under it, and then lifting with two hands from the middle white section of the inner skeleton was the best way for me to move it. I wouldn't hold it from the bottom. Great review of both! Next on my list is to rebuild the original 2006 Star Destroyer. And then the Death Star!
Darth Vader definitely should have been in the set. It is HIS Star Destroyer.
Best comparison I've seen so far!
Good observation. 12 lbs isn't a ton. 2000 lbs is.
@@nathanharris6450 whoops
Aww I miss going on my mom's phone and binge watching Lego animations for hours in my room. The good days...
17:34 The Gap: I am inevitable...
On a side note, look at sooo many star destroyer MOCs to realise that you can hide the gap. But I get it would add pieces and raise the price (as if it wasn't high enough), but I reckon they could have tried. At least that would start making the £650 look more tolerable...
Very underrated lego channel
I am getting the 2019 version for my graduation present.
I found a complete disassembled 10030 at a yard sale last summer for $15 lol. No box, they had all the parts stuffed in big zip lock bags. Best find of the year.
The 2002 Tantive looks like the one from the Original Trilogy Videogame so it automatically wins
Imagine being that kid , seeing all that Lego around you… it’d make you go into a frenzy.
You should say
'In the design category, the force is strong with this one.'
Mandrproductions favourite word/s is swoosh/swooshable and swooshability
I love the new model! It's a shame its bigger than my appartment tho...
Is your apartment a cardboard box?
@@jamesallmon7756 no I was making a joke
I live at home, have one bedroom to work with, and already have Lego Star Wars sets on every shelf on every wall of my room. Yet I ordered this anyway and it will be here in a few days...
I like how the full size tantiff vi is in the background
We want a droid control ship set!
These both are the ISD1 Devastator becouse of the Tantive IV but the 2002 version is narrower, making it look like an ISD2. And in the 2019 version you can lower the antenna, a feature thats only in the ISD2 even though they both are the same ISD1 Devastator.
I cant wait
*(STAR WARS THE RISE OF SKYWALKER SPOILERS)*
ok, last warning.
the star destroyer with the planet destroyer at the bottom
Leah dies , palpatine is alive , rey is related to palpatine, ben turns good last sec and dies for rey
Rey gets a yellow saber
Lego In A Suit iss a coo movie iss juss a bad way to end a saga
And luke redeems himself and catches the lightsaber he throws in the list jedi after rey threw it
MandR: "It's just kinda stuck in there"
Me: "Thats what she said"
At first glance It honestly looks like someone split the destroyer in half
I saw this Star Destroyer in half!
Another Holdo maneuver
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
Getting a like for the TB12 jersey in the background.
One word: magnets. The new version wins based on that along, imo.
I love the Star Wars music in the background.
wish it had mini hammerhead corvette.
If only they made a Lego set on Admiral Thrawn's star destroyer. And also the Imperial II Star Destroyer, the Acclamator, the Victory, Providence, Munificent, Recusant, Malevolence, Arquitens and also the Harrower class Dreadnought in it's early form as UCS sets. Also forgot to include the Consular in it's Diplomatic red look and clone wars look as a UCS set.
I feel like some people got mad that he said Star Destroyers were triangles.
Yeah doesn't he know it's shape is a CIRCLE, smh. Ryan needs some glasses
@@pizzatimestops4544, clearly.
On the newer version, at 18:36, that small bay is actually an Officers docking bay. It's ment for officers, VIPs and the dark lord himself. Fun fact...
Imagine how they would look if they remake these ucs sets in 10-15 years from now.
Noah Maldonado hopefully they do because the UCS SSD is pretty overrated and bad as a UCS set because LEGO didn’t even bother to do detail on the bottom side of the ship and decided to make it completely flat for a half-assed interior
It will fly
Probably will be in minifig scale
It would either be mini fig scale or it would be a inch long
@@galadato7425 It would have to be around 25 meters or 84 feet
The communication radar thing is actually the tractor beam targeting
Yeah but when do we get the UCS Minifigure Scale Imperial Star Destroyer?
Well when do we get the REAL LIFE scaled usc version?
It would be 68 feet long😂
Ik how to fix the gap: use 1 by 4 plates joining every 2 studs using flat plates on top and normal on bottom, then lay it along
I just can’t justify dropping that much money on that but good video
VulturePilot same, The UCS falcon can be justified. This tho eehhh
Justify is subjective but I can guarantee this, if you ever buy it and build it, you won’t regret the purchase
i can't get enough of those new engines
My mom won't let me buy another big Lego like that after I secretly bought the UCS Falcon XD She said one is enough :3
Growing up my parents wouldn't even buy me a $10 Lego lol I had 0 Lego products growing up. Now I'm 28 have my own money and spend $2000 at the Lego store within 2 months lol I got my first Lego set at like 24 years old lpl
@@feztoys Hey man better late then never. When I have my own place you bet I'll make room for all those sets
@@geniusatwork12 Yeah man, I just bought a brand new home last year and have a room where I still start putting my collections. Room is empty right now but little by little it will take shape.
Star destroyer crew: we got mini Death Stars on ours!
Kenobi: it’s not a good ball
What’s Corey’s channel?
I'm planning to get the 2019 in the next week or two so I've got it before it gets retired, issue is going to be finding a spot in my room to display. Especially since the UCS Falcon is taking up a bit of space.
No contest between the tantive IV, 2002 has it hands down. Such a classic-and yea, the new one does try to get too cute with fancy techniques, the nose looks terrible on the new one.
While I plan on getting the new one for a fleet, I’m not worried about it outshining the original. 2002 ucs star destroyer is gonna go down as the best ucs of all time-it set the standard back in the day and the new one owes everything it has to the original.
I have the 2002, post build, I wound up adding about 2500 additional pieces to reinforce and add greeble/finish. Out of the box, the frame tends to split and warp, unless you add more braces. The docking bay is just a hole. There's no reactor bulge underneath. The interior was SCREAMING for at least a diorama.
If they want me to shell out an extra 400 bucks for the new one, they'd have to do a lot better.
Bruh, if they didn't include the 2 minifigures the set would retail for just 100 dollars
I have looked at it for a long time and I wanted to buy 1 last Lego set before I’ll stop buying it for me, 1 last time to be a child again. You were the last straw, and I will buy it tomorrow. Thank you!
I dont think any one is gonna be swoshing around the star destroyer
7ft boi: *picks up star destroyer *
Seeing your sets in the background makes me so jealous. I only have one bedroom to keep my entire collection in, and every time I get a new big ship I have to rearrange the entire room around it. Because of this, and obviously money too, I've missed out on so many amazing UCS sets. I do have a 2019 Star Destroyer on its way here, but I'll likely have no room left at all once I display it.
I have the exact same problem.
The lack of color hurts my eyes
finally a newer version of a set is larger
I love the newer version but I don’t have that kind of money and there’s no way my parents are letting me get that
Nostalgia overload, thank you for comparing the two side by side. I thought they were the same but now see they’re very different. I was 11 when my crazy dad bought the 2002 version during 2006. Finally finished after like 3 days. Tried to move it and it just exploded. Ended up super gluing it back together.. what a mess. The Star Destroyer II was a lot better design wise.
With these two side by side I can tell yours is old gray
A fine addition to my collection