German Tiger Tank Vs 3 US Tanks Battle Scene | FURY (2014) Movie CLIP HD

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 300

  • @hunterprowsemrereviews9141
    @hunterprowsemrereviews9141 2 місяці тому +73

    Fun fact the Tiger tank used in the movie for this scene was Tiger 131. The famous last fully functional running example of an early production Henchel Panzerkampfwagen VI. Fully restored by The Bovington Tank Museum where it now resides. And comes out for the annual tank parade on the Bovington Tank grounds.

  • @Ultraelectromagnetic
    @Ultraelectromagnetic 2 місяці тому +151

    I know a lot of people like to tear this scene apart and even I did after seeing the film the first time, but I still love it. Despite the issues it's still one of the best movie tank battles out there. All the actors nailed the intensity and desperation of the situation, and the fact the film was able to use the real Tiger 131 that was captured in WW2 is insanely cool.

    • @matthewskudzienski888
      @matthewskudzienski888 2 місяці тому +2

      They also set up with these Reenactors

    • @Tankumentary
      @Tankumentary 2 місяці тому +3

      Its amazing, I love the way the turret pops off the sherman, I think the only real way to make some scenes more realistic and still have this column scene would be if they got more shermans in their production but with the amount of shermans they have now and their budget, I think they did a great job

    • @denisdaly5200
      @denisdaly5200 2 місяці тому +4

      I agree, there is a lot to dislike and like in the scene (and the movie as a whole), but the visuals, atmosphere, acting and props are very good. It's a movie I can re-watch time and again.

    • @billbillson5082
      @billbillson5082 2 місяці тому +4

      Honestly with how movies are now, i completely appreciate anything like this movie.

    • @Infernal460
      @Infernal460 2 місяці тому +4

      ​@@denisdaly5200There is atmosphere but only skin deep
      The good guy win because of the plot, the German Tank commander makes mistake after mistake after mistake.

  • @ougentrost
    @ougentrost 2 місяці тому +155

    Big US bullshit scene. In reality, the Tiger would have used the distance, definitely not closing in! He would have easily destroyed all 3 Sherman by its superior aiming and penetration values without suffering a scratch. Full stop.

    • @gihandananjaya2611
      @gihandananjaya2611 2 місяці тому +14

      1000% correct.some time weapon cannot do all.need good commander.

    • @septianagista1409
      @septianagista1409 2 місяці тому +11

      Coz it's called Hollywood brotha, being realistic is not their way

    • @peterlinz2733
      @peterlinz2733 2 місяці тому +5

      @@ougentrost Ausserdem hatten die Amis die Order Tiger nur im Verhältnis von 5:1 Anzugreifen,ansonsten wurde luftunterstützung angefordert.

    • @neue01
      @neue01 Місяць тому +8

      It’s actually important to show that tiger tanks had to be hit from the side or behind. This helps the average viewer see what the US was up against

    • @nicologiani3426
      @nicologiani3426 24 дні тому +5

      And he would have taken Brad Pitt tank first, not the last 😂 (basic ambush tactic)

  • @MarkusM2
    @MarkusM2 2 місяці тому +73

    Well, in short, the winner writes the story.
    Greetings from Bavaria

  • @cryguy3815
    @cryguy3815 2 місяці тому +24

    That Tiger Tank loader crew is on drugs or something? How long need to load anti tank? 🗿

  • @mattblack118
    @mattblack118 2 місяці тому +83

    Here's what would have really happened. Tiger tank sees the Easy 8 as the only tank that's a significant threat. Tiger tank shoots Fury in the side destroying the tank and killing or injuring the crew. Brad Pitt is launched out of his commanders hatch like a champagne cork - sparing us having to watch the rest of this inane movie. The End.

    • @ebee-uz1oz
      @ebee-uz1oz 2 місяці тому +4

      typical convoy tactic, take out the lead vehicle, the take out the rear vehicle, then pick off the rest....

    • @1918BARsam
      @1918BARsam 2 місяці тому

      @@mattblack118 and then the Tiger proceeds to shoot the last tank. Meanwhile, the M4A1 76w spots the Tiger, loads HVAP shell and score a direct hit. Skirmish over, two Shermans lost for one Tiger.

    • @lesmotley6839
      @lesmotley6839 2 місяці тому +8

      I couldn't understand why a tiger tank in a protected position would pull out and try to shoot on the move.
      Any commander would have fired from a stationary position keeping his thickest frontal armorial facing forward.
      Nothing made sense in that God awful movie.

    • @ebee-uz1oz
      @ebee-uz1oz 2 місяці тому +3

      @@lesmotley6839 yeah, that be like the tiger is a sniper, hiding, and after popping a few people, decided to leave his hiding place and walks right up to his target for a close-in shot.....if it was still hiding, it could still take out the others.

    • @alukata9763
      @alukata9763 2 місяці тому +2

      @@1918BARsam That's still unrealistic scenario..
      the distances the Tigers usually fought at were 1-2km, the M4A1s shell is gonna lose so much kinetic energy over that distance that it won't be able to penetrate the 100mm frontal armor...

  • @michaelcarden9623
    @michaelcarden9623 21 день тому +2

    For all those criticizing the tactics used by the Tiger crew in this scene I remember reading Albert Speer many years ago and I remember him mentioning the Germans ramping up tank production in 1944 but then noting at one point that something like thirty panthers were lost almost immediately on deployment in September 1944 due to inexperienced crews.
    This movie takes place several more months after the above date. Who is to say the Tiger crew here was not simply severely inexperienced?

    • @giovanniborrelli
      @giovanniborrelli 17 днів тому

      Vero, i Tigre per l' epoca erano macchine sofisticate, e abbisognavamo di equipaggi addestrati. I Tigre con adeguata copertura aerea e logistica , sarebbero stati invincibili.

    • @intermilan9731
      @intermilan9731 16 днів тому

      But they sound pretty professional and futuristic.

  • @VidWatcher-v4j
    @VidWatcher-v4j 2 місяці тому +85

    The Tiger tank would have taken out the three Shermans with three shots.

    • @Stormoak
      @Stormoak 2 місяці тому +5

      100% Accuracy in real warfare is unrealistic. Even modern Main Battle Tanks with far better optics and digital fire support for the gunner will not get it. In WW2 you had to estimate the range to the target with human eyeside alone wich can be tricky especially you are in real danger to be killed immediatly by the opponent if you are to slow. My paternal grandfather was a Panzer Crewmen in the 7th and later the 22th Panzerdivision. War is not a Videogame

    • @VidWatcher-v4j
      @VidWatcher-v4j 2 місяці тому

      Did your grandfather talk much about the war?

    • @peterlinz2733
      @peterlinz2733 2 місяці тому +10

      @@VidWatcher-v4j Ausserdem hätten nie Drei Sherman einen Tiger angegriffen,die Amerikaner hatten die Order nur im Verhältnis 5:1 anzugreifen

    • @5co756
      @5co756 Місяць тому +5

      ​@@Stormoak German optics had small triangles , you could measure the range if you know the height of the enemy tank . They scored hits at 1000m with the first shot .

    • @irldeadlycommander
      @irldeadlycommander Місяць тому +4

      @@Stormoak in this situation is really hard miss them with Tiger... This film is total garbage.

  • @B.W.165
    @B.W.165 2 місяці тому +34

    The Tiger was really tough but not all-powerful at first, the Shermans couldn't destroy it, it was almost impossible. But here it is already April 1945 and the Fury is modified with a 76 mm gun that could destroy the Tiger from 250 yards and this whole situation with a blow from behind is just for a tense scene in the movie.

    • @diablo56100
      @diablo56100 2 місяці тому +3

      The only Sherman variant that can actually pen a Tiger’s front was the British Sherman with the powerful 17-Pounder gun. Just because it was a 76, but it had a lot more kick behind it since they decided to have a longer barrel so they can give it more propellant to shove that round harder on heavy armored targets like the Tiger.

    • @Tankumentary
      @Tankumentary 2 місяці тому +6

      @@diablo56100 No both the 17 pounder and the 76mm on the M4A3E8 can penetrate the Tigers frontal armor. Even the 75mm can penetrate the tiger frontal armor from about 100m give or take. Maybe you are thinking of the Panther? That thing cant be penetrated by the American 76mm

    • @mikesmith-wk7vy
      @mikesmith-wk7vy 2 місяці тому

      Nope the only allied tanks that could front to front knock out one was the British Sherman’s with the tungsten ap round and the Pershing 90mm gun . The high velocity gun could have gotten a side hit though they didn’t have to go for the rear

    • @rudicentenaro7524
      @rudicentenaro7524 2 місяці тому +2

      Fury 76 mm cant do nothing vs tiger also....just hellcat maybe can hurt tiger bcs helcatt is a tank destroyer...fury isnt

    • @1918BARsam
      @1918BARsam 2 місяці тому +1

      @@rudicentenaro7524 the hellcat and fury have the exact same gun. Difference is hellcats would carry a lot more HVAP rounds that were pretty capable of destroying a tiger from the front at long distances.
      Since fury takes place on April 45, those Shermans would have some HVAP rounds and could destroy that Tiger easily.

  • @slats8376
    @slats8376 2 місяці тому +77

    Why did the tiger break cover...maintain the element of suprise. Absolutely no way would a tiger commander charge forward. Totally unrealistic and pure hollywood. Michael Wittman would be in tears at this.

    • @michaeldowson6988
      @michaeldowson6988 2 місяці тому +1

      Late war; the best of the Wehrmacht was already dead. But this isn't terribly accurate tactically.

    • @rankoorovic7904
      @rankoorovic7904 Місяць тому +2

      It's a fun movie nothing more nothing less.
      The biggest inaccuracy is the fact that tanks are without any infantry support both German and American

    • @nallyvaico
      @nallyvaico Місяць тому +2

      Moreover, the Tiger being unable to face the Fury coming from behind is ridiculous. The Tiger is almost square, and is well known to be able to turn around on the spot like no other tank!

    • @Дмитрий-ш1б8т
      @Дмитрий-ш1б8т Місяць тому

      The tank left its shelter because it was fired upon with phosphorus shells. The resulting smoke screen prevented the crew from orienting themselves in the area.

    • @nallyvaico
      @nallyvaico Місяць тому +1

      The Tiger knocked out the Shermans alright, even despite the smoke screen. Further, the Tiger was ridiculously rolling back trying to move its gun in the direction of the Fury, while it could well have turned around on its tracks

  • @beat89widmer26
    @beat89widmer26 20 днів тому +1

    If this film came out during 1965, the Tiger would really be a M47 Patton.

  • @С.А-й3т
    @С.А-й3т Місяць тому

    Воюй не числом! А умением ! Супер фильм !!! Ярость с Бредом Питом!!! ❤❤❤

  • @thoralfhelmutson7953
    @thoralfhelmutson7953 2 місяці тому +13

    Warum schauen die Amis nicht alle aus dem Panzer raus....
    😂😂😂

  • @teencomment
    @teencomment 25 днів тому

    I love Norman's look of horror when he sees two shells bounce right off its armor. You can even see him mouth a little "Fuck..."

  • @LoneWolf-zh1iy
    @LoneWolf-zh1iy 2 місяці тому +19

    As good as this film is, this scene is what ruins it for me. There is no way a Sherman tank could get hit twice (side and front) by a Tiger tank without being destroyed, led alone disabled. In reality, that Tiger would've won, despite the fact that he went by his hubris, and exposed himself out in the open without staying put where he initially was.

    • @chriskey7440
      @chriskey7440 2 місяці тому +3

      It's a fictitious movie, calm down haha

    • @LoneWolf-zh1iy
      @LoneWolf-zh1iy 2 місяці тому +2

      @chriskey7440 Bruv, I'm more calm than you'll ever be. But when it comes to films, especially WW2, they should always be based on FACT.
      So if there was a film (based in WW2) where one German soldier holds off the entire US military at Omaha beach, you'd be okay with that???

    • @chriskey7440
      @chriskey7440 2 місяці тому +1

      @LoneWolf-zh1iy if it was entertaining yes, because I know films like this are meant more for entertainment, than reality. But if I watch Schindler's List, then I'd expect more realism, as that movie holds massive significance, compared to Fury.

    • @LoneWolf-zh1iy
      @LoneWolf-zh1iy 2 місяці тому +1

      @chriskey7440 By the sounds of it, you'd happily let the filming industry (Hollywood) shit on reality, by casting facts aside just to peak your amusement???

    • @chriskey7440
      @chriskey7440 2 місяці тому +1

      @LoneWolf-zh1iy for certain films yes. I don't go to Hollywood for facts, I read, I increase my knowledge the old school way I guess. To each their own, but you sure seem the opposite of calm haha.

  • @andreasmartin7942
    @andreasmartin7942 Місяць тому +4

    Frontal assault against a Tiger. That's smart.

  • @edwarddonnachie4412
    @edwarddonnachie4412 24 дні тому

    An absolutely gripping scene.

  • @BWEinfachOlivgrün
    @BWEinfachOlivgrün Місяць тому +9

    It's Hollywood Baby! 😂😆 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪

  • @최일웅-c7w
    @최일웅-c7w 2 місяці тому +4

    When they first charged across the field, the three american tanks should have started more far apart from each other. That way, the German tank would take more time to rotate the turret inbetween aiming for the tanks. Also as the tanks would run down the field, the further away the tanks are to the side, it would be harder for the German tank to aim because the velocity of the running tank would be felt as faster than one running directly from the front.

  • @rentonis
    @rentonis 24 дні тому +1

    In Michael Wittman book (tiger expert) it is written that when you as a commdaner of a tank see AMVs or tanks on the road you always have to aim the first vehicle than the last to block the others from using the road for escaping and force them to do reverse.

    • @Baumbart
      @Baumbart 23 дні тому

      Which book please? He dont wrote any book. He was an SS tank commander. The ns-propaganda makes many myth on his name.
      Not all kills are documented and verified.

    • @rentonis
      @rentonis 23 дні тому

      @ sorry. The book is from Otto Carius I checked it, but I have another book which is about general taxtics with tiger and it says the same.

    • @sergeantsalty1236
      @sergeantsalty1236 18 днів тому

      ​@@BaumbartDeine Videos sprechen Bände,nach 80 Jahren immer noch frustriert und geldgeil ?

    • @Baumbart
      @Baumbart 17 днів тому

      @@sergeantsalty1236
      Welche Videos? Und wo spricht da etwas Bände? Und was hat das mit Geld zutun?

  • @diablo56100
    @diablo56100 2 місяці тому +5

    One thing I find funny is that the E8 was much faster the other two Shermans. The Sherman that got its tank commander killed was a 76(W) and it was a early Sherman. So not fast. The next one that took the shot to the hull was M4A3 and it was a late war version. Better engine and armor, but not much, and it was still slow.

  • @ichman9699
    @ichman9699 2 місяці тому +16

    So ein Käse, der Tiger wäre nie aus der Deckung gefahren und geschossen hätte er als erstes auf den vorderen Panzer um die anderen zu blockieren und dann auf die andere.
    Typischer Hollywood Streifen 😂😂😂

  • @robertoorellano620
    @robertoorellano620 Місяць тому +3

    Con el primer disparo el 88 y el tigre destruyen al primero y al ultimo sherman de la formacion, luego con el 2do disparo rematan a los demas. Pero esto es hollywood 😂

  • @getsome3015
    @getsome3015 2 місяці тому +1

    It is like watching BMW vs Chevy or Chrysler. Ahahahahahahhaa

  • @Xinevlin
    @Xinevlin 17 днів тому

    The 76mm has some capabilities to penetrate the upper front of the Tiger from a kilometer away but i wonder why they decide to go around it to take out the engine.

  • @davidmurray5399
    @davidmurray5399 2 місяці тому +11

    By 1944-45, veteran U.S. tank commanders knew enough about the reality of their combat environment to deal with German armor and anti-tank guns. I rather doubt a group of Shermans, advancing to contact, would do so in column, unless the terrain required it. They would advance in a 'One up-two back' formation, spread out enough so that the tanks didn't mask each others fire and vision. They would most likely have an element of armored infantry with them[ Half-tracks, in various models, with at least a 81mm mortar carrier in the group], and would move with over-watch and using any cover to flank the enemy position.

    • @kieranhurst8543
      @kieranhurst8543 2 місяці тому +4

      Yeah nobody cares mate, we're for cool movie action

    • @davidmurray5399
      @davidmurray5399 2 місяці тому

      @@kieranhurst8543 My Dad's youngest Uncle was a Marine Corps tanker, fought on Saipan and Okinawa. I talked with him about his service and he said the only tank-on-tank action he experienced was on Saipan, it was risky enough against the less capable Japanese armor and anti-tank guns. Yeah, the action is nice and dramatic, but I like historical context as well.

    • @alukata9763
      @alukata9763 2 місяці тому

      In reality the german crew would not have charged

  • @condorsouthernlands4730
    @condorsouthernlands4730 2 місяці тому

    Lepuff: “just do it, on the waaaay!”

  • @ConanNg-r9k
    @ConanNg-r9k 3 дні тому

    3:43 Tiger's shell only lost to Furious plot rear armor

  • @peterlinz2733
    @peterlinz2733 2 місяці тому +39

    Einer der Schlechtesten Filme,nur dazu gedacht die Amerikaner zu Heroisieren.

    • @falk6121
      @falk6121 2 місяці тому +8

      Allerdings, da muß man nicht einmal rechtsgestrickt oder sonst irgendwie nationalistisch angehaucht sein. American crap!

    • @Baumbart
      @Baumbart 23 дні тому

      Nö.

    • @peterlinz2733
      @peterlinz2733 23 дні тому +1

      @Baumbart Du hast keine Ahnung,aber davon hast du ne ganze Menge!!!Wenn man keine Ahnung hat,einfach mal die Fresse halten.

    • @XXD4MAX
      @XXD4MAX 8 днів тому

      Ha ha

    • @peterlinz2733
      @peterlinz2733 8 днів тому

      @XXD4MAX Du bist auch einer von denen der Keine Ahnung hat und alles glaubt was ihm Hollywood versetzt lol

  • @Twirlyhead
    @Twirlyhead 2 місяці тому +1

    British Sherman Firefly says _Hey, you chaps. What's all the fuss about ?_

  • @guillermogutierrez5303
    @guillermogutierrez5303 2 місяці тому +3

    Como siempre los gringos ganan pero estaban muertos de miedo por el tanque alemán

  • @frantanavratil551
    @frantanavratil551 2 місяці тому +4

    taková krásná pohádka pro pozdvihnuti morálky USA 🤣

  • @tedmac8049
    @tedmac8049 Місяць тому

    Bollox!! Tiger rules lad!

  • @Hauptgefreiter01
    @Hauptgefreiter01 2 місяці тому +15

    Unrealistisch. Der Tiger hätte die ganzen Sherman vernichtet, bei 1. Fahrzeug angefangen.

  • @ktm620lc4
    @ktm620lc4 Місяць тому +3

    german tanks best tanks ever❤

    • @Baumbart
      @Baumbart 23 дні тому

      Not really. It gaves many good tank types on this time.

    • @ktm620lc4
      @ktm620lc4 23 дні тому +1

      @Baumbart no

    • @Baumbart
      @Baumbart 23 дні тому

      @@ktm620lc4
      Nope.

    • @sergeantsalty1236
      @sergeantsalty1236 18 днів тому

      ​@@BaumbartAntifa's Schreibtischdienst ?!

  • @andreishibkov5324
    @andreishibkov5324 Місяць тому +1

    Разведка? А что это?😂

  • @jorgk.2921
    @jorgk.2921 2 місяці тому +3

    No, no, no…. So many mistakes… Great technical movie, but not Tank- tactial….

  • @alias6789
    @alias6789 2 місяці тому +5

    Bad movie. Bad tactics... Bullshit. Burnt the DVD in my garden. Fugg it!

  • @ВикторПетров-ц1е
    @ВикторПетров-ц1е 2 місяці тому +5

    A strikingly stupid and illogical scene. Why didn't the tiger hit the first tank with the most powerful cannon? Oh, the movie would have ended.

  • @laci60
    @laci60 Місяць тому +4

    Michael Wittmann, destroyed 27 tanks in a single day, including several Sherman Fireflies, when his tank was conducting reconnaissance near Caen in Normandy.

    • @Baumbart
      @Baumbart 23 дні тому

      Lots of myth and propaganda. Not all kills are documented. He dies in his tiger.

  • @thomasblau441
    @thomasblau441 2 місяці тому +27

    Im echten Krieg wären alle vier Panzer zerstört worden wenn sie versucht hätten ihn anzugreifen

  • @rikspring
    @rikspring 2 місяці тому +5

    0:01 yeah sure ...driving in your tank on the batllefield with open hatches😅
    Hollywood crap

    • @giovanniborrelli
      @giovanniborrelli 17 днів тому

      Nella realtà solo i russi combattevano a portelli chiusi, e subivano molte più perdite.

  • @Vidmaker-o7u
    @Vidmaker-o7u 20 днів тому +1

    Bro the tank ,fury, is a Sherman firefly because it’s cannon is longer

    • @viettien141
      @viettien141 5 днів тому

      Fury is an American M4A3E8 with 76mm gun, the Sherman Firefly is British version of Sherman

    • @Vidmaker-o7u
      @Vidmaker-o7u 5 днів тому

      Noice

  • @hellheaven-dy2bz
    @hellheaven-dy2bz 2 місяці тому +3

    one german tank did all of that crazy

  • @MrTechFido
    @MrTechFido 2 місяці тому +1

    Shia Labeouf🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @bgonline1
    @bgonline1 Місяць тому

    In these times no tank could fire on the ride! Every tank must stop in order to shoot.

    • @lyndoncmp5751
      @lyndoncmp5751 Місяць тому

      Otto Carius, famous Tiger commander, said it COULD be done, but that it wasn't necessary to do so.

  • @ChristopherWood-b8j
    @ChristopherWood-b8j Місяць тому

    The Tiger wouldn't have needed to come out into the open, it could have picked those Shermans off from where it was.

  • @danielwillametz4453
    @danielwillametz4453 24 дні тому

    Get the treads than get behind it

  • @buraksiyon
    @buraksiyon 2 місяці тому

    It would have been much more impressive if they had added an anecdote like damaging the turret drive before getting behind Tiger in this scene. When the M4 was behind the Tiger, the Tiger had at least two shots time :) Or it would have been more realistic if one of the ricocheting bullets bounce had wounded the Tiger's loader or something. Still, it was a very impressive movie. In fact, it would have been very realistic if Tiger broke down for some reason and the Furry team survived because of it.

  • @matthewskudzienski888
    @matthewskudzienski888 2 місяці тому +4

    (M4 Sherman)
    (WAR):
    (WORLD WAR 2)
    (Korean war)
    (Vietnam war)

  • @ii.1378
    @ii.1378 Місяць тому

    Танкисты из засады выбивают всегда первого идущего танка, первым делом уничтожают первого танка. Но здесь все по другому.

  • @1918BARsam
    @1918BARsam 2 місяці тому +4

    Realistic outcome:
    0:29 - Second Sherman dead
    0:35 - Fury loads HVAP round
    0:41 - Tiger dead

    • @dannowak6468
      @dannowak6468 2 місяці тому +9

      Realistic outcome.
      001: Tiger kills lead tank Fury with first shot trapping other Sherman's on road.
      008 - 050: Tiger kills remaining Sherman's.

    • @1918BARsam
      @1918BARsam 2 місяці тому

      @@dannowak6468 there'd still be one 76mm armed Sherman. It returns fire and the Tiger is dead

    • @jurgschupbach3059
      @jurgschupbach3059 2 місяці тому

      ​@@1918BARsamHowever, war production
      APDS rounds lacked accuracy,
      and the 50 mm penetrator was less destructive after it had penetrated enemy tank armour than the 76.2 mm APCBC shell. APDS ammunition was rare until the post-war period. While the Sherman Firefly was capable of carrying 77 rounds of ammunition, design features of the tank meant only 23 rounds were easily and readily available when the tank was in action.

    • @1918BARsam
      @1918BARsam 2 місяці тому

      @@jurgschupbach3059 Sherman Firefly?!? APDS?
      Those are US units and never used such equipment. The 76mm gun M1 used HVAP rounds, didn't have APDS.

  • @kennethkellogg6556
    @kennethkellogg6556 2 місяці тому +1

    And BTW, why was there a Tiger all by itself without any infantry support?

    • @ArcticWolf00Alpha0
      @ArcticWolf00Alpha0 2 місяці тому

      The same reason why Russian and Ukrainian tanks are seen alone in the current conflict today. Poor logistics, improper planning or not enough manpower.

  • @herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513
    @herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513 Місяць тому +1

    Lol... Real life have been different but is Hollywood

  • @raymondyee2008
    @raymondyee2008 2 місяці тому

    Bacuffz had a video on this ions ago and it’s German but he dissected the tactics here.

  • @СергейМарченков-ц4х

    При сьемках использовался настоящий Тигр.

  • @ElielSousaSousa
    @ElielSousaSousa 2 місяці тому

    Tiger 131 é uma máquina.

  • @EthanGreeman
    @EthanGreeman 2 місяці тому +1

    If it the tigers commander would have just stayed where he was and hit the easy eight first he would of won but that would killed the main character and there would be no movie

  • @SteveCurran-f5d
    @SteveCurran-f5d 2 місяці тому

    This is only a film dont forget crews on tigers we're not as experienced as crews earlier in the war

  • @saschak.6687
    @saschak.6687 Місяць тому +1

    Einer der schlechtesten Panzerfilme aller Zeiten! Was für ein Schrott! Wenn unsere Jungs damals so gekämpft hätten, wären sie nicht mal am polnischen Schlagbaum vorbei gekommen....😂😂😂 ....Was wohl nicht schlecht gewesen wäre....😢

  • @castleinthesky1303
    @castleinthesky1303 2 місяці тому

    I have m4a3 in wot...nice tank

  • @СергейТаточко
    @СергейТаточко Місяць тому

    В настоящем бою эти Шерманы были бы уничтожены Тигром как куропатки. Режиссёр видимо понятия не имеет как танки должны атаковать. В этом фильме они атакуют в один ряд, причём рядышком идут. Наводчику даже прицел не надо менять, а передвигать башню только. За две минуты они были бы все уничтожены.

  • @otobluearrow
    @otobluearrow Місяць тому

    best scene, thx alot!

  • @endorphinoftheday
    @endorphinoftheday 10 днів тому

    Цирк. Зачем Тигр начал сближение, если дистанция итак убойная в любую проекцию Шермана, притом любым типом боеприпаса бронебойным, кумулятивным или подкалиберным

  • @PedroAlves-pj4dy
    @PedroAlves-pj4dy Місяць тому

    Just one tiger....

  • @rankoorovic7904
    @rankoorovic7904 Місяць тому +3

    Usually Germans shoot the first tank in the colomn but not when Brad Pitt is the commander of that tank 😂
    Fun movie for sure but any discussion about accuracy is a waste of time 😊

    • @JM7284
      @JM7284 Місяць тому

      Because you were there...thanks for your first hand account of history.

    • @rankoorovic7904
      @rankoorovic7904 Місяць тому

      @@JM7284 You have plenty of first hand accounts they just require reading them you can't watch them on a screen

  • @MintEastwood.24
    @MintEastwood.24 2 місяці тому

    Nobody figured to aim for the tracks. Rooky mistake. Either that or load gold.😉

  • @sivaslibora
    @sivaslibora 7 днів тому

    Yankees You had no chances without airforce. this film is a just hollywood comedy

  • @Vernunftspartei
    @Vernunftspartei Місяць тому

    How unrealistic.
    Why would the tiger close in on the shermans?
    Why let the last sherman go behind him?

  • @Дмитрий-ш1б8т
    @Дмитрий-ш1б8т Місяць тому

    Many people find this scene illogical, even idiotic. Everyone is betting on the Tiger to win and wondering why the Shermans won. If this had happened at a training ground, then yes, the Tiger would have won. But they are not at a training ground. So, point by point.
    1. The Shermans are moving across the field, visibility is good, the enemy has nowhere to hide. The Americans are not expecting an attack at all. After all, the Germans have long retreated. Therefore, it is not surprising that they missed the ambush of one tank. One tank is very easy to camouflage and difficult to detect.
    2. After the last tank in the column was knocked out, the American tankers quickly figured out where the fire was coming from. The cloud of gunpowder gases gave away the enemy's location. Why didn't the Germans knock out the lead tank? And what would that have changed? An ambush of just one tank. In any case, the rest of the tanks would also have deployed into battle formations and accepted the fight.
    3. Since the Americans knew nothing about the enemy, they began to retreat into the forest. Seeing that there was only one tank there, they fired phosphorus shells at it, creating a smoke screen. What should they do next? Run? Where to? You can’t outrun a Tiger. Its gun is guaranteed to hit you. Moreover, they think that the Tiger is moving and will certainly be able to pursue them. The Sherman commander did the right thing by giving the order to advance. This was the only way out. While the Tiger is in the smoke, they need to quickly close in on it and knock it out from close range. After all, the Tiger’s armor is very strong. Why should they advance side by side? And how should they advance? If they split up, firstly, they will lose precious time, and secondly, they will expose their sides, increasing their chances of being knocked out.
    4. The Tiger commander is no fool either. He could not remain in ambush. The smoke screen was making it difficult to see the enemy, and the acrid smoke from the white phosphorus would have been uncomfortable for the German crew. So he moved forward to get a better view of the enemy tanks. The Tiger emerged from the smoke before the Shermans could get close to it. Why didn't the Tiger stop? Probably because the German commander didn't want to become a target. It's much harder to hit a moving tank. The American tanks didn't stop for the same reason. The Tiger knocked out the two right Shermans to prevent them from going around it from the right. The other two tanks were heading straight for it. It knows for sure that its frontal armor will hold up if something happens.
    5. When the last two Shermans remained, they were almost right next to the Tiger. Logically, they began to scatter in different directions to attack the Tiger from the flanks. The Tiger knocked out another tank, and its commander quickly realized what he wanted to do with the last Sherman. He immediately began to back up and turn the turret. Why did he open fire with the machine gun? To kill the Sherman commander or to convince him to hide in the turret. It is more difficult to observe from the turret, and in such a situation you need to keep both eyes open so as not to miss your chance. The Americans, by the way, did the same. Why didn’t the Tiger turn around on its tracks to speed up aiming? Why did it need to do that? The German tank had already managed to aim, fire and hit the side. The shell passed tangentially. The Sherman received minor damage, but did not lose its combat capability. The excitement of the Tiger crew is growing. Now the Sherman is a real threat. The Germans understand what this Sherman is doing and begin to move forward to break the distance. The Germans want to finish off the Sherman as quickly as possible, and fire a second shot. Damn it, it’s too early!!! The shell only grazed the front part. But there is no point in spinning on the tracks anymore. The Germans continue to move forward and turn the turret. They almost aim, but don't have time. The end.

  • @justinkrzywonos7061
    @justinkrzywonos7061 2 місяці тому +7

    Brad Pitt would have had a grease gun not a Thompson submachine gun. This movie was so inaccurate it makes me laugh.

    • @TheMadHessian
      @TheMadHessian 2 місяці тому +2

      Look closer. Not a Thompson. 😉

    • @nichedaily
      @nichedaily 2 місяці тому +2

      he uses a captured stg 44 throughout the film, not a thompson....

  • @andreassimon3381
    @andreassimon3381 2 місяці тому +5

    what a crap

  • @marcojustino4400
    @marcojustino4400 2 місяці тому

    Lighter Ronson! 🙄😒

  • @MightyKongPlays
    @MightyKongPlays 25 днів тому

    One hell of a movie 🔥🔥🔥

  • @kankan-yo5ni
    @kankan-yo5ni 2 місяці тому +2

    在二戰的交換比率中,平均下來是三輛謝爾曼交換一輛虎式.所以這部電影並不誇張.

    • @XXD4MAX
      @XXD4MAX 2 місяці тому

      almost

  • @andrebischoff1035
    @andrebischoff1035 Місяць тому +1

    Warum sollte sich der Tiger auf diese Amihelden zubewegen???

  • @fernando9192x
    @fernando9192x 26 днів тому

    May be thats why us tanks are so huge now.

  • @Tamnguyen-nd1io
    @Tamnguyen-nd1io Місяць тому

    Old actors are not a reality

  • @DonTrom-r8h
    @DonTrom-r8h 23 години тому

    Oh dear oh dear. Silly American movie. Kudos to Bovington for allowing the use of these amazing tanks in the movie though esp 131 the legend. Ok. So, the Yanks refused to use the Firefly Sherman conversion. Stupid boys. One famous incident recorded the destruction of 3 Tigers by one Brit Firefly including killing a highly decorated Tiger vet commander. The English gun on the Firefly was completely capable of penetrating the Tiger forward armour, so the manoeuvres used in the movie were unnecessary. As someone else said, the Tiger would have attacked the Firefly first, destroying it from the side, then would have easily defeated the remaining Shermans. Still, great to see these wonderful tanks in action, total kudos to Bovington Tank Museum.

  • @LukášHakl-m8j
    @LukášHakl-m8j Місяць тому

    Pěkná pohatka pro děti Tiger bi jedal Jak nic nikdy bi nevijel tak dobrého místa 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @rifatidrizovic9281
    @rifatidrizovic9281 8 днів тому

    Brad Pitt mit STG44

  • @nidobaer
    @nidobaer Місяць тому

    These movie is hardly bearable

  • @abmusicoffic
    @abmusicoffic 2 місяці тому

    The movie Fury is one of the best when it comes to tank movies... Very good

    • @Hauptgefreiter01
      @Hauptgefreiter01 2 місяці тому +2

      Unrealistisch

    • @alukata9763
      @alukata9763 2 місяці тому +3

      it's one of the worst, too unrealistic.

    • @GerhardSchutz
      @GerhardSchutz 2 місяці тому +2

      Ami Scheiss 😂😂😂

    • @Hauptgefreiter01
      @Hauptgefreiter01 2 місяці тому +2

      @@GerhardSchutz naja, er soll unterhalten. Er ist gut gemacht. Realistisch wäre Brat Pitt mindestens 3 mal gestorben, angefangen bei dem Kampf gegen die PAK 🤣🤣🤦‍♂️

  • @marianbakos3957
    @marianbakos3957 26 днів тому +1

    Větší blbost jsem ještě neviděl!!!!

  • @JaroslavPesl-i1w
    @JaroslavPesl-i1w 2 місяці тому +1

    Amerika comedy 😂

  • @ms-biketec-zhmichaelschenk4967
    @ms-biketec-zhmichaelschenk4967 5 днів тому

    So ein Scheiß der Tiger hätte niemals die Deckung verlassen und die drei Blechbüchsen hatt er zum Frühstück verspeist !

  • @dushmanextreme...2564
    @dushmanextreme...2564 Місяць тому +1

    Rubbish film

  • @Francis-m2d
    @Francis-m2d 2 місяці тому +2

    What a joke.

  • @tomevans4402
    @tomevans4402 Місяць тому

    Dang

  • @zmanmotors6649
    @zmanmotors6649 2 місяці тому

    Great movie.

  • @ignaziomormando8990
    @ignaziomormando8990 2 місяці тому +4

    Che minchiata di film

  • @ethan8661
    @ethan8661 2 дні тому

    Lucky they will face to Panzer VI Tiger I, But in fact history, The Nazi Germany all Heavy Tank Division change to operate More fire power and heavy armour protect Tanks, Is Panzer VI King Tiger, If there moive put the King Tiger, They not against heavy armour and deadly heavy fire power tank gun.

  • @andrebischoff1035
    @andrebischoff1035 Місяць тому +1

    Ein US-Schwachsinn!!

  • @danielassuncao526
    @danielassuncao526 19 днів тому

    Warthunder in console:

  • @valeriakaraoulnova1036
    @valeriakaraoulnova1036 Місяць тому +2

    L'équipage du char allemand a commis une grave erreur en quittant le couvert, il aurait été capable de détruire les chars US sans danger pour lui. Il devait s'agir d'une bande d'incapabl es idiots ! 😂😂😂

  • @cat-im4vv
    @cat-im4vv Місяць тому +1

    Hollywood fantasy...

  • @datemasamune2904
    @datemasamune2904 Місяць тому +1

    I dont care how unrealistic this is. I still enjoyed the film

  • @kristelvidhi5038
    @kristelvidhi5038 Місяць тому

    We all know we don't always get what we want, so there's no use arguing about how lazy this scene is.

  • @uff64
    @uff64 21 день тому

    So far beyond reality...OMG. .... And of course : Just show the German Maschine, never the guys inside. To make people believe being German is true evil. Btw, German tank crews never ever corresponded inside the tank like shown.....

  • @nizalmuhammad9689
    @nizalmuhammad9689 2 місяці тому +2

    3:55 76mm can penetrate tiger from that distance, tiger 1 is really overrated

    • @mikesmith-wk7vy
      @mikesmith-wk7vy 2 місяці тому +2

      Nope the British 17 pounder on their Sherman and the 90mm Pershing guns were the only ones that even in theory could knock out a tiger from the front

    • @tomislavbosnjak66
      @tomislavbosnjak66 2 місяці тому

      76 mm could actually penetrate front armor of the Tiger 1 but under 300 m or less​@@mikesmith-wk7vy

    • @1918BARsam
      @1918BARsam 2 місяці тому +1

      @@mikesmith-wk7vy what?! The 76mm could definitely pen the front of a Tiger 1. At ~500 meters using standard APC, and at ~1200 meters using tungsten-core HVAP. Fury belongs to a 2nd armored division unit that was historically supplied with HVAP rounds since late 1944.

    • @ss44bbrr33
      @ss44bbrr33 Місяць тому +1

      Realistisch wäre der Firefly der erste Panzer gewesen der zerstört worden wäre. Danach wär der Rest der Kolonne nur noch Übungsschießen für den Tiger. Diese Szene und auch die davor mit der Pak-Stellung sind so unrealistisch.

    • @mikesmith-wk7vy
      @mikesmith-wk7vy Місяць тому

      @@ss44bbrr33 yea , thats why the British would camo paint the barrel on the firefly to disguise it as a regular Sherman