Tbf, this was near the end of the war. Most of what was left of the German army were rushed conscripts, the old, and wounded. Not to mention the fact that they probably hadn’t had any food or rest for awhile. Morale was probably low too.
@@maseoembry4165 AT had kill markings on the barrels + mutiple recent burnt out tanks in the field, meaning these crews had no issue with killing other tanks offscreen. Obviously in a realistic scenario, Fury and the other shermans would've been knocked out but this is just an Hollywood action movie. If you are going into the movie expecting a realistic depiction of the battles, you are going to be sorely disappointed. Fury was a movie showing the horrors of war, how it can affect and change the moral compass of a man shown by following the story of the new hull gunner. Just all the realism snobs being miserable and beating down on the movie because "erm that Tiger scene was not realistic, the long 76 could easily deal with the tank frontally from a distance, 4 shermans to kill a tiger myth," holding the movie to standards it was never setting out to achieve and ignoring the reason Fury was created in the first place.
@@TamamoF0X It is nothing special for American war movies. They are never realistic, as they always show the bad Germans and the „heroes“ from the US, except in documentaries. So, just the usual Ami Hollywood crap. Disgusting!
The combat in this movie is the worst. Those guns are PaK 40's. For those who have never seen one they are about 3 feet tall and 3 feet wide and would one shot a Sherman. A moving Sherman scoring direct hits is as ridiculous as the PaK 40's missing an as big as a house Sherman at the same range. And do not get me started on the Tiger fight.
Perhaps the gunners were inexperience scared and hungry. Perhaps when three angry Sherman's bore down on them, all guns blazing they became distracted.
The "crossroads" scene at the end of the movie was a joke also. The Germans would have killed Fury in 5 minutes after they realized it was still in service.
This movie had the cast, the sets, the costumes, the cinematographer...it could have been great. Whoever designed the battle scenes ought to have an anti-Oscar.
Dude I am not a military strategist but The performance of the german anti tank guns was horrible Is it really that hard to hit a sherman? why didint all of the german AT's fire at the same time? 3:55 what was bro waiting for? The tank was in full sight, there was no way he would miss and he still didin't shoot The germans are shit in this movie I swear man
Can’t agree more. This scene feels just awkward. Open field, clear sight, slow moving tank, short range, and German AT guns keep missing. I hope the creator came up with something to make the scene believable, like a foggy weather or smoke screen.
Part of the reason if we’re talking historically was because at the end of the war most German soldiers only had a few weeks of training before being sent out to the front, but obviously Hollywood plot armor is also a play here lmao
The German 88 was said to be 100% accurate at 1,000 yards. Obviously that’s in perfect conditions and battle conditions, green troops etc would make it less accurate although you would think they would have hit those tanks easily.
If it was 100% accurate at 1000 yards, then they wouldn't have lost the war. I think you're right though that battle conditions and an inexperienced crew were in play in this scene. The director also said that in an actual battle the tanks would've been far more spread out to present a less tempting target, but that wouldn't work on screen because you would only get one tank on screen at a time.
@@danieldravot341 The same freaking crews on these guns wiped out the halftacks at more range. Having first shot advantage from concealment at even closer range and they missed?
That looked more like a scene out of Star Wars than a WWII movie. I don't understand how the German anti tanks guns could hit a single Sherman tank going 10 mph in a straight line.
people talk about gun accuracy, if they do, the movie will end at first scene. it's movie, of course there's always plot hole. despite all the critics, i do have also but still can enjoy it.
You miss the point here. Of course there has to be a plot and the story needs to be told. But 4 tanks approaching slowly and NOT ONE SINGLE SHELL is a hit? From that distance, with the element of surprise? Come on, give me a break. In the Tiger scene there were also some very unrealisitc turn of events but at least the Tiger killed 3 other Shermans first before Fury finally got him. But the AT scene is just plain ridicolous!
I'm sorry but a Pak40 doesn't fail at that distance, the allies needed many more tanks and air control to assault a position like that, even so most of the defensive positions were defeated because they ran out of ammunition.
The Americans must have X-ray vision. They see everything in the forest and after reaching it, they know there are no german troops anymore. And during the fight they have enough time for theoretic discussions. Superman is nothing compared to these heroes.
Both of those German guns had multiple stripes painted on the gun tube.... That means they are hardcore killers.... and in this movie they missed every shot.... Yawn....
and that would have been in the past the not last couple of days in the field. So their tally would probably be higher and they had already taken out half-tracks at the start.
The script writers don't even have the IQ to think and let that german AT gun destroy at least one sherman with a good shot...its pure comedy that american forces here almost got away without a casualty fighting this defence line...
Just plain garbage Hollywood script. From that distance with the element of surprise on their side there is NO WAY those AT guns would have missed every single shot. Especially not high since they were aiming at the tracks and lower hull first to bring them to a halt. That was the main objective of every experienced AT crew. Make the tank stop first so it can't further advance towards them and then finish it off. Bad, bad unrealistic, totally bogus script. Nice optics but no reality!
Pak in A bridge too far was more accurate, hit in one shot. But at 1945, a well established PAK site only can hit halftracks… if they more accurate they can penetrate at that distance with pak40 and movie end here.
The commander played by Brad Pitt tells his subordinate tank commanders to "keep an eyeball on high ground' next command is watch the friendlies on the ground. Shit commander.
Everyone defending this stupid scene seems to think its impossible to change the scene so the Sherman use cover, smoke, and tactics to defeat the German 75mm AT crew. Instead of sheer dumb luck.
An absolute fairy tale. The Germans were invisible, camouflaged and had 2 accurate guns, it would have been enough to make 5-6 shots to hit 4 tanks located in an open and clearly visible field.....
Im hatr when a war movie make the enemy of the MC always miss like is a war movie is must have some PTSD and reality of wars not like a f*** family cinema
I was quite excited when this movie came out... before I saw it. Strong cast, excellent work on the vehicles, sets, etc. Very poor script. Not just this scene, but pretty consistently throughout the film.
I admire the courage of the soldiers, even with bullets coming in their direction they hardly dodge. Very good movie Tracer ammunition makes the scenario very interesting
Luckily the Germans are so crappy with the anti tank guns, the machine guns etc. They put the fox holes in the middle of the battlefield, without any possibility to retreat. But good for the allied forces. Someone might have died otherwise...
Some of us have fired AT guns and shoulder mount AT weapons at stationary and moving targets at far greater range than those Shermans The whole scene is shit. Two of the Shermans would have been one shot kills before the other two knew there were AT facing them. At that point it is 50/50 who gets the next shot in. Though at that point the infantry would be putting 2 panzafaust on each remaining Sherman. At that range it is a kill, or at least a mobility kill and stunned crew. Which means the next shot from the AT is a kill. Then the MG's take out the remaining infantry. That is the tactics I trained on for ambushing convoys. BTW this is real military not a game or airsoft.
Really poor action scene...... WW2 War films in the 50s were more realistic than this. Why spend so much on all the details of what the guys are wearing and carrying, and then have a poor script?
LOL Remember that time Shermans were equipped with radio speakers and played "working on the railroad" when attacking the enemy!? Stfu and watch a documentary.
Did they say anything about this movie “based on a real story”. Did any of these character exist in WW2, this movie is made with the purpose of entertainment and yall keyboard historian pushing it like its 1:1 representation of a historical event.
Dude. Half the movies from 60s are fabricated and made up and still fan favorites. People who complain about a action movie set in a historical setting with a made up story are just dumb. ENJOY THE MOVIE!!!
Maybe, maybe not. Hitting a target in combat conditions is a lot harder than it seems. Even a hit is not guaranteed to penetrate and a penetrating hit is not guaranteed to knock out a tank.
@@jonathanbirkeland1085 It wasn't combat condition at the beginning, it was ambush condition. Any ambush scenario in movies where the ambushing party takes all the losses while the ambushed party takes little to no losses is just unrealistic.
@@alukata9763 Very true. The first shots, at that range, would have been two kill shots on two Shermans. The fight would have started with only 2 Shermans left. Having taken out the half tracks the Germans would know the exact ranges. This is just my personal experience of having done this sort of thing in the military.
LOL what? This "star wars laser effect" is NOT some added up effect for viewers entertainment. It's legitimately how the projectile illuminates so it helps shooters to adjust the aiming as they literally see the bullet's trajectory. It was used in WW1 already.
The PAK 40's get four rounds off in 3 mins from stationary locations, all miss. Fury fires several rounds whilst moving, all hits. Such bunch of arse and no wonder some Americans think they won war alone. Why is the dialogue in modern films just a description of what is happening? But tanks, brilliant.
while the aesthetics and the production was stellar but I hate what they did to the enemy, German army in WW2 are not to be messed with. They conquered Europe for a reason. In an open field, Pak are pretty deadly look what happen to eastern front. They didn’t even pop smokes or use their air supremacy ( where they can completely control even before D day). The old war movie like the bridge too far are well known for balance portraying the armies and logistics of each faction and this just hollywood bs cash cow to satisfy their own ego 😂.
Worst tank scene I’ve witnessed in a while. Sadly this garbage is based on a true story. Go learn about the real tank which was called In the Mood and its amazing crew. Also, Brad Pitts characters nickname was War Daddy. Nuff said
This was an idiotic movie from start to finish. Script is stupid, action is moronic, all the actors looked and sounded super bored the whole time. Hated it.
Read the comments and i can tell half the people here would not be fun to take with to the movies. Nit picking on a ACTION movie where the main characters supposed to have plot armor and the enemies are supposed to be dumb down. And its a made up story. If they got killed in the first engagement it wouldnt be a great movie at all
When you wanna talk about why the Germans are so shit with their aim and the bad decisions from the Tiger tank crew, well, this takes place in April 1945. That alone should answer the question
Because of Hollywood plot armor Or did you mean the Germans, who destroyed the previous convoy (which the Shermans were rescuing), took a look at the calendar and realized they were supposed to lose the war?
The Americans were facing VERY experienced SS troops. They were the reserve force for defending the Atlantic Wall but were not expected to be there by the Allies. They were far more experienced than the US troops.
IMHO this is a textbook example of how armor and infantry are supposed to work together. The tank is essentially a mobile pillbox, providing cover and artillery support for the troops moving up behind it.
It is a complete sham and NOT how to do it. The AT would have taken out 2 of the 4 tanks in the opening shots. Then panzafaust and 2nd AT shots would have taken out the other two in 30 seconds. The tanks should have stayed hull down and not gone through the hedge.
The Germans in this movie made the stormtroppers in Star Wars look like sharpshooters.
Tbf, this was near the end of the war. Most of what was left of the German army were rushed conscripts, the old, and wounded. Not to mention the fact that they probably hadn’t had any food or rest for awhile. Morale was probably low too.
cause fear of death
@@maseoembry4165 brother really is saying a quote from Call of Duty World At War
@@maseoembry4165 AT had kill markings on the barrels + mutiple recent burnt out tanks in the field, meaning these crews had no issue with killing other tanks offscreen.
Obviously in a realistic scenario, Fury and the other shermans would've been knocked out but this is just an Hollywood action movie.
If you are going into the movie expecting a realistic depiction of the battles, you are going to be sorely disappointed.
Fury was a movie showing the horrors of war, how it can affect and change the moral compass of a man shown by following the story of the new hull gunner.
Just all the realism snobs being miserable and beating down on the movie because "erm that Tiger scene was not realistic, the long 76 could easily deal with the tank frontally from a distance, 4 shermans to kill a tiger myth," holding the movie to standards it was never setting out to achieve and ignoring the reason Fury was created in the first place.
@@TamamoF0X It is nothing special for American war movies. They are never realistic, as they always show the bad Germans and the „heroes“ from the US, except in documentaries.
So, just the usual Ami Hollywood crap. Disgusting!
From that range those AT guns would have smashed those tanks. They were super accurate and very feared because of it!
Yeh, everything about this movie has been ripped to shreds by military enthusiasts.
Yeah this movie was a joke, what a lost opportunity for a really good movie.
The combat in this movie is the worst. Those guns are PaK 40's. For those who have never seen one they are about 3 feet tall and 3 feet wide and would one shot a Sherman. A moving Sherman scoring direct hits is as ridiculous as the PaK 40's missing an as big as a house Sherman at the same range. And do not get me started on the Tiger fight.
Perhaps the gunners were inexperience scared and hungry.
Perhaps when three angry Sherman's bore down on them, all guns blazing they became distracted.
The "crossroads" scene at the end of the movie was a joke also. The Germans would have killed Fury in 5 minutes after they realized it was still in service.
One of the most realistic yet unrealistic scenes of all time
It’s classic authenticity vs accuracy. It’s an authentic feeling scene, but it’s very inaccurate
Must've been inspired by Star Wars battle of Hoth scenes
This movie had the cast, the sets, the costumes, the cinematographer...it could have been great.
Whoever designed the battle scenes ought to have an anti-Oscar.
Dude I am not a military strategist but
The performance of the german anti tank guns was horrible
Is it really that hard to hit a sherman?
why didint all of the german AT's fire at the same time?
3:55 what was bro waiting for? The tank was in full sight, there was no way he would miss and he still didin't shoot
The germans are shit in this movie I swear man
Can’t agree more. This scene feels just awkward. Open field, clear sight, slow moving tank, short range, and German AT guns keep missing. I hope the creator came up with something to make the scene believable, like a foggy weather or smoke screen.
I recognize that Actor he used to play as Sam From Transformers from my childhood back in 2007
Check out mr tank expert over here
@@matthewskudzienski888Yep. It's Shia LeBouf.
Part of the reason if we’re talking historically was because at the end of the war most German soldiers only had a few weeks of training before being sent out to the front, but obviously Hollywood plot armor is also a play here lmao
it's like you miss a 12 inch target at 50 yards with your scoped rifle - Impossible 🤣
Brad Pitt🔥🔥🔥
As they got real Shermans and Tiger 131 yet they couldn't hire a WW2 tank tactics expert.
アメリカ人の弾だけ当たって、ドイツ人の弾が当たらない。これって、史実の逆になっている。ドイツの対戦車砲の命中率は５００ｍでほぼ１００％。
The German 88 was said to be 100% accurate at 1,000 yards. Obviously that’s in perfect conditions and battle conditions, green troops etc would make it less accurate although you would think they would have hit those tanks easily.
If it was 100% accurate at 1000 yards, then they wouldn't have lost the war. I think you're right though that battle conditions and an inexperienced crew were in play in this scene. The director also said that in an actual battle the tanks would've been far more spread out to present a less tempting target, but that wouldn't work on screen because you would only get one tank on screen at a time.
Those aren’t 88s…they’re 75mm anti tank guns.
@@malbug75mm could still penetrate sherman though.
@@mattrinck7503 The scene is just unrealistic.
@@alukata9763 Entire movie sort of was...
The Germans would not have missed
Maybe earlier in the war. This was set in Germany near the end of the war and the remaining troops were not Blitzkrieg quality.
@@danieldravot341 The same freaking crews on these guns wiped out the halftacks at more range. Having first shot advantage from concealment at even closer range and they missed?
@@panzerabwerkanone fear of death
@@danieldravot341 The Germans probably had a lot more combat experience than the US troops. Most of the US troops had not been in combat before D-Day.
That looked more like a scene out of Star Wars than a WWII movie.
I don't understand how the German anti tanks guns could hit a single Sherman tank going 10 mph in a straight line.
2:19 - it kinda makes me wondering where that missed projectile landed in the end 😁
people talk about gun accuracy, if they do, the movie will end at first scene.
it's movie, of course there's always plot hole.
despite all the critics, i do have also but still can enjoy it.
You miss the point here.
Of course there has to be a plot and the story needs to be told.
But 4 tanks approaching slowly and NOT ONE SINGLE SHELL is a hit?
From that distance, with the element of surprise?
Come on, give me a break.
In the Tiger scene there were also some very unrealisitc turn of events but at least the Tiger killed 3 other Shermans first before Fury finally got him.
But the AT scene is just plain ridicolous!
The Longest Day. I remember that great movie! They don't make movie, like they used to be.
I'm sorry but a Pak40 doesn't fail at that distance, the allies needed many more tanks and air control to assault a position like that, even so most of the defensive positions were defeated because they ran out of ammunition.
This is either the worst WW2 movie ever or the funniest WW2 movie ever
The Americans must have X-ray vision. They see everything in the forest and after reaching it, they know there are no german troops anymore. And during the fight they have enough time for theoretic discussions. Superman is nothing compared to these heroes.
Anti tank silahları marklı ; ama hiç biri tankı delemedi :D
Shouldn't the ricochet impact sound make the crew temporarily deaf? I'm sure that thing makes a hell of a sound
Stationary AT guns miss the tanks in open field, moving tanks hit every AT gun or tank in bush line…yep, that is how it went…😂
American film, American star, American Money. Beats any stationary, concealed AT Gun at 500m :-)
Felt more like a Company of Heroes 2 match. 😂
Both of those German guns had multiple stripes painted on the gun tube.... That means they are hardcore killers.... and in this movie they missed every shot.... Yawn....
Im waren Leben wären alle Panzer in 5min zerstört und die Kanonenschützen hätten Feierabend ....
You know that, I know that, most of the world knows that but its an American film with an American star....
In combat emotions are not your friend. Fight now. Cry later, if you can.
Fire at will 💪🏻
2:46 4 white stripes (kill rings) indicate that this gun crew destroyed 4 enemy tanks or self proppelled guns (not light vehicles)
and that would have been in the past the not last couple of days in the field. So their tally would probably be higher and they had already taken out half-tracks at the start.
Байки..
The script writers don't even have the IQ to think and let that german AT gun destroy at least one sherman with a good shot...its pure comedy that american forces here almost got away without a casualty fighting this defence line...
Guys… it‘s a movie, not a documentary..
Just plain garbage Hollywood script.
From that distance with the element of surprise on their side there is NO WAY those AT guns would have missed every single shot.
Especially not high since they were aiming at the tracks and lower hull first to bring them to a halt.
That was the main objective of every experienced AT crew.
Make the tank stop first so it can't further advance towards them and then finish it off.
Bad, bad unrealistic, totally bogus script.
Nice optics but no reality!
😮the tanks name sherman firefly
Pak in A bridge too far was more accurate, hit in one shot. But at 1945, a well established PAK site only can hit halftracks… if they more accurate they can penetrate at that distance with pak40 and movie end here.
Which episode of Star Wars is this from?
German's firing bullets are like stormtrooper's laser bullet..pew pew
The commander played by Brad Pitt tells his subordinate tank commanders to "keep an eyeball on high ground' next command is watch the friendlies on the ground. Shit commander.
Fury and tank crew could have gone all the way to Berlin by themselves and ended the war in two weeks. This is the worst war movie I’ve ever seen.
only in movies a AT shell cannot blast the tank
Everyone defending this stupid scene seems to think its impossible to change the scene so the Sherman use cover, smoke, and tactics to defeat the German 75mm AT crew. Instead of sheer dumb luck.
This Szene is nearly as Bad as the one against the Tiger
Звездные войны, начало! И у противника даже лазеры другого цвета!
снимали б лучше дальше звездные войны и рэмб.... такая чушь
Neat but the wrong tactics on both sides.
Well certainly on the US side.
You’d also have the 75mm shooting its HE vs the 76mm.
An absolute fairy tale. The Germans were invisible, camouflaged and had 2 accurate guns, it would have been enough to make 5-6 shots to hit 4 tanks located in an open and clearly visible field.....
no STUGs or Jagdtigers?
In reality they wouldn't be needed for 4 shermans.
This is a movie not a historical documentary. Every one with a degrading comment are couch potato historians.😂😂😂
So lächerlich diese Scene, die vier Panzer wären schon nach 3 Sekunden Geschichte
Probably 30 seconds.
Tanyaken ka militer nu kitumah aya nu ngabogaan kecuali ,
Holywood BS!!!😂
one of the worst war films of all time 😅
Im hatr when a war movie make the enemy of the MC always miss like is a war movie is must have some PTSD and reality of wars not like a f*** family cinema
I was quite excited when this movie came out... before I saw it. Strong cast, excellent work on the vehicles, sets, etc. Very poor script. Not just this scene, but pretty consistently throughout the film.
I admire the courage of the soldiers, even with bullets coming in their direction they hardly dodge. Very good movie Tracer ammunition makes the scenario very interesting
They are actors. There are no bullets or tracer (or noise) it is all added later.
Luckily the Germans are so crappy with the anti tank guns, the machine guns etc. They put the fox holes in the middle of the battlefield, without any possibility to retreat. But good for the allied forces. Someone might have died otherwise...
德国士兵MG42不想活了？坦克这么大的靶子看不到？还要指引其他火力射击坦克？标记坦克？ 不是这样的？为什么用拽光弹暴露自己？
니가 의사야?
It's a movie relax.
How could this be? When did UA-cam end up with so many World War II veterans?
Some of us have fired AT guns and shoulder mount AT weapons at stationary and moving targets at far greater range than those Shermans The whole scene is shit. Two of the Shermans would have been one shot kills before the other two knew there were AT facing them. At that point it is 50/50 who gets the next shot in. Though at that point the infantry would be putting 2 panzafaust on each remaining Sherman. At that range it is a kill, or at least a mobility kill and stunned crew. Which means the next shot from the AT is a kill. Then the MG's take out the remaining infantry. That is the tactics I trained on for ambushing convoys. BTW this is real military not a game or airsoft.
Really poor action scene...... WW2 War films in the 50s were more realistic than this. Why spend so much on all the details of what the guys are wearing and carrying, and then have a poor script?
you forgot it is just a movie... take a pill, or two...
I'm no history buff.. Don't need to be to enjoy this movie.
LOL Remember that time Shermans were equipped with radio speakers and played "working on the railroad" when attacking the enemy!?
Stfu and watch a documentary.
Did they say anything about this movie “based on a real story”. Did any of these character exist in WW2, this movie is made with the purpose of entertainment and yall keyboard historian pushing it like its 1:1 representation of a historical event.
Dude. Half the movies from 60s are fabricated and made up and still fan favorites. People who complain about a action movie set in a historical setting with a made up story are just dumb. ENJOY THE MOVIE!!!
an amazing, but BRUTAL movie.....
In reality the AT guns would have destroyed all tanks.
Maybe, maybe not. Hitting a target in combat conditions is a lot harder than it seems. Even a hit is not guaranteed to penetrate and a penetrating hit is not guaranteed to knock out a tank.
@@jonathanbirkeland1085 It wasn't combat condition at the beginning, it was ambush condition.
Any ambush scenario in movies where the ambushing party takes all the losses while the ambushed party takes little to no losses is just unrealistic.
@@alukata9763 Very true. The first shots, at that range, would have been two kill shots on two Shermans. The fight would have started with only 2 Shermans left. Having taken out the half tracks the Germans would know the exact ranges. This is just my personal experience of having done this sort of thing in the military.
This star wars laser is the worst effect in this movie, i know its better to see whats happening, but just looks weird and remove all the imersion.
LOL what? This "star wars laser effect" is NOT some added up effect for viewers entertainment. It's legitimately how the projectile illuminates so it helps shooters to adjust the aiming as they literally see the bullet's trajectory. It was used in WW1 already.
Mai visto un film più stupido. Col cazzo che mancavano il bersaglio.
The PAK 40's get four rounds off in 3 mins from stationary locations, all miss. Fury fires several rounds whilst moving, all hits. Such bunch of arse and no wonder some Americans think they won war alone.
Why is the dialogue in modern films just a description of what is happening?
But tanks, brilliant.
Niemals.
while the aesthetics and the production was stellar but I hate what they did to the enemy, German army in WW2 are not to be messed with. They conquered Europe for a reason. In an open field, Pak are pretty deadly look what happen to eastern front. They didn’t even pop smokes or use their air supremacy ( where they can completely control even before D day). The old war movie like the bridge too far are well known for balance portraying the armies and logistics of each faction and this just hollywood bs cash cow to satisfy their own ego 😂.
What a junk.
Worst tank scene I’ve witnessed in a while. Sadly this garbage is based on a true story. Go learn about the real tank which was called In the Mood and its amazing crew. Also, Brad Pitts characters nickname was War Daddy. Nuff said
US propaganda
This was an idiotic movie from start to finish. Script is stupid, action is moronic, all the actors looked and sounded super bored the whole time. Hated it.
Мясорубка
영화를 보는 사람들이 왜 못 맞추냐 불평하는데 등장인물들이 말 그대로 죽기 직전인 상황이라는걸 생각하고 보면 딱히 신경 쓰이지 않음
米軍のは百発百中でドイツ軍のは全然当たらないってか。
安っぽい映画だ。
American bullshit propaganda.😅
Der Film ist der letzte Dreck.
😂😂😂
Read the comments and i can tell half the people here would not be fun to take with to the movies. Nit picking on a ACTION movie where the main characters supposed to have plot armor and the enemies are supposed to be dumb down. And its a made up story. If they got killed in the first engagement it wouldnt be a great movie at all
To show mercy to the enemy on the battlefield is to be cruel to yourself.
One of my favorite war movies ever made!
Lol its one of the worst made in accuracy.
@@detachsoup6061 Accuracy is shit but for action and grittiness. Its alright
@@HunterXStyle123 It is simply not believable unless you are a 12 year old.
@JAmediaUK well yes. That's why I said accuracy is shit. Those Germans would've taken out those shermans easily.
When you wanna talk about why the Germans are so shit with their aim and the bad decisions from the Tiger tank crew, well, this takes place in April 1945. That alone should answer the question
Because of Hollywood plot armor
Or did you mean the Germans, who destroyed the previous convoy (which the Shermans were rescuing), took a look at the calendar and realized they were supposed to lose the war?
The Americans were facing VERY experienced SS troops. They were the reserve force for defending the Atlantic Wall but were not expected to be there by the Allies. They were far more experienced than the US troops.
Bollywood
🇺🇸🕊️🏅🎖️🫡✝️🪖
🇺🇸👮🙊☠
Fury the biggest racism American bullshit movie
That movie was such crap
Garbage movie.
That cry baby type later grew older and became a Kamala voter!🤪🤪🤪
IMHO this is a textbook example of how armor and infantry are supposed to work together. The tank is essentially a mobile pillbox, providing cover and artillery support for the troops moving up behind it.
It is a complete sham and NOT how to do it. The AT would have taken out 2 of the 4 tanks in the opening shots. Then panzafaust and 2nd AT shots would have taken out the other two in 30 seconds. The tanks should have stayed hull down and not gone through the hedge.
I remember this scene Former Tanker explain in this clip
watch?v=w1rrz-PHX0c&t=1033s