Anti-Tank Guns Vs Tanks Scene | FURY (2014) Movie CLIP HD
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 лис 2024
- Anti-Tank Guns Vs Tanks Scene | FURY (2014) Movie CLIP HD
Most Popular Movie Clips -- bit.ly/3aqFfcg
PLOT: A grizzled tank commander makes tough decisions as he and his crew fight their way across Germany in April, 1945.
RELEASE DATE: October 17, 2014 (USA)
GENRE: Action, Drama, War
STARS: Brad Pitt, Shia LaBeouf, Logan Lerman
WATCH NOW!
DP.SonyPictures...
SUBSCRIBE for more all the latest Movie Clips here: bit.ly/31ByDAf
Wanna support us? Get your JoBlo Merch right here!
joblo-merch.cr...
#Fury
The Germans in this movie made the stormtroppers in Star Wars look like sharpshooters.
Tbf, this was near the end of the war. Most of what was left of the German army were rushed conscripts, the old, and wounded. Not to mention the fact that they probably hadn’t had any food or rest for awhile. Morale was probably low too.
cause fear of death
@@maseoembry4165 brother really is saying a quote from Call of Duty World At War
@@maseoembry4165 AT had kill markings on the barrels + mutiple recent burnt out tanks in the field, meaning these crews had no issue with killing other tanks offscreen.
Obviously in a realistic scenario, Fury and the other shermans would've been knocked out but this is just an Hollywood action movie.
If you are going into the movie expecting a realistic depiction of the battles, you are going to be sorely disappointed.
Fury was a movie showing the horrors of war, how it can affect and change the moral compass of a man shown by following the story of the new hull gunner.
Just all the realism snobs being miserable and beating down on the movie because "erm that Tiger scene was not realistic, the long 76 could easily deal with the tank frontally from a distance, 4 shermans to kill a tiger myth," holding the movie to standards it was never setting out to achieve and ignoring the reason Fury was created in the first place.
From that range those AT guns would have smashed those tanks. They were super accurate and very feared because of it!
Yeh, everything about this movie has been ripped to shreds by military enthusiasts.
Yeah this movie was a joke, what a lost opportunity for a really good movie.
The combat in this movie is the worst. Those guns are PaK 40's. For those who have never seen one they are about 3 feet tall and 3 feet wide and would one shot a Sherman. A moving Sherman scoring direct hits is as ridiculous as the PaK 40's missing an as big as a house Sherman at the same range. And do not get me started on the Tiger fight.
Perhaps the gunners were inexperience scared and hungry.
Perhaps when three angry Sherman's bore down on them, all guns blazing they became distracted.
The "crossroads" scene at the end of the movie was a joke also. The Germans would have killed Fury in 5 minutes after they realized it was still in service.
The German 88 was said to be 100% accurate at 1,000 yards. Obviously that’s in perfect conditions and battle conditions, green troops etc would make it less accurate although you would think they would have hit those tanks easily.
If it was 100% accurate at 1000 yards, then they wouldn't have lost the war. I think you're right though that battle conditions and an inexperienced crew were in play in this scene. The director also said that in an actual battle the tanks would've been far more spread out to present a less tempting target, but that wouldn't work on screen because you would only get one tank on screen at a time.
Those aren’t 88s…they’re 75mm anti tank guns.
@@malbug75mm could still penetrate sherman though.
@@mattrinck7503 The scene is just unrealistic.
@@alukata9763 Entire movie sort of was...
One of the most realistic yet unrealistic scenes of all time
people talk about gun accuracy, if they do, the movie will end at first scene.
it's movie, of course there's always plot hole.
despite all the critics, i do have also but still can enjoy it.
Dude I am not a military strategist but
The performance of the german anti tank guns was horrible
Is it really that hard to hit a sherman?
why didint all of the german AT's fire at the same time?
3:55 what was bro waiting for? The tank was in full sight, there was no way he would miss and he still didin't shoot
The germans are shit in this movie I swear man
Can’t agree more. This scene feels just awkward. Open field, clear sight, slow moving tank, short range, and German AT guns keep missing. I hope the creator came up with something to make the scene believable, like a foggy weather or smoke screen.
I recognize that Actor he used to play as Sam From Transformers from my childhood back in 2007
Check out mr tank expert over here
@@matthewskudzienski888Yep. It's Shia LeBouf.
Part of the reason if we’re talking historically was because at the end of the war most German soldiers only had a few weeks of training before being sent out to the front, but obviously Hollywood plot armor is also a play here lmao
The Germans would not have missed
Maybe earlier in the war. This was set in Germany near the end of the war and the remaining troops were not Blitzkrieg quality.
@@danieldravot341 The same freaking crews on these guns wiped out the halftacks at more range. Having first shot advantage from concealment at even closer range and they missed?
@@panzerabwerkanone fear of death
Звездные войны, начало! И у противника даже лазеры другого цвета!
The Longest Day. I remember that great movie! They don't make movie, like they used to be.
I admire the courage of the soldiers, even with bullets coming in their direction they hardly dodge. Very good movie Tracer ammunition makes the scenario very interesting
Brad Pitt🔥🔥🔥
That looked more like a scene out of Star Wars than a WWII movie.
I don't understand how the German anti tanks guns could hit a single Sherman tank going 10 mph in a straight line.
As they got real Shermans and Tiger 131 yet they couldn't hire a WW2 tank tactics expert.
In combat emotions are not your friend. Fight now. Cry later, if you can.
This is either the worst WW2 movie ever or the funniest WW2 movie ever
One of my favorite war movies ever made!
Lol its one of the worst made in accuracy.
@@detachsoup6061 Accuracy is shit but for action and grittiness. Its alright
I was quite excited when this movie came out... before I saw it. Strong cast, excellent work on the vehicles, sets, etc. Very poor script. Not just this scene, but pretty consistently throughout the film.
How could this be? When did UA-cam end up with so many World War II veterans?
Which episode of Star Wars is this from?
When you wanna talk about why the Germans are so shit with their aim and the bad decisions from the Tiger tank crew, well, this takes place in April 1945. That alone should answer the question
Fire at will 💪🏻
Neat but the wrong tactics on both sides.
Everyone defending this stupid scene seems to think its impossible to change the scene so the Sherman use cover, smoke, and tactics to defeat the German 75mm AT crew. Instead of sheer dumb luck.
only in movies a AT shell cannot blast the tank
no STUGs or Jagdtigers?
Felt more like a Company of Heroes 2 match. 😂
영화를 보는 사람들이 왜 못 맞추냐 불평하는데 등장인물들이 말 그대로 죽기 직전인 상황이라는걸 생각하고 보면 딱히 신경 쓰이지 않음
Luckily the Germans are so crappy with the anti tank guns, the machine guns etc. They put the fox holes in the middle of the battlefield, without any possibility to retreat. But good for the allied forces. Someone might have died otherwise...
an amazing, but BRUTAL movie.....
It's a movie relax.
Im hatr when a war movie make the enemy of the MC always miss like is a war movie is must have some PTSD and reality of wars not like a f*** family cinema
니가 의사야?
Fury and tank crew could have gone all the way to Berlin by themselves and ended the war in two weeks. This is the worst war movie I’ve ever seen.
Read the comments and i can tell half the people here would not be fun to take with to the movies. Nit picking on a ACTION movie where the main characters supposed to have plot armor and the enemies are supposed to be dumb down. And its a made up story. If they got killed in the first engagement it wouldnt be a great movie at all
The commander played by Brad Pitt tells his subordinate tank commanders to "keep an eyeball on high ground' next command is watch the friendlies on the ground. Shit commander.
This was an idiotic movie from start to finish. Script is stupid, action is moronic, all the actors looked and sounded super bored the whole time. Hated it.
To show mercy to the enemy on the battlefield is to be cruel to yourself.
In reality the AT guns would have destroyed all tanks.
Maybe, maybe not. Hitting a target in combat conditions is a lot harder than it seems. Even a hit is not guaranteed to penetrate and a penetrating hit is not guaranteed to knock out a tank.
@@jonathanbirkeland1085 It wasn't combat condition at the beginning, it was ambush condition.
Any ambush scenario in movies where the ambushing party takes all the losses while the ambushed party takes little to no losses is just unrealistic.
The PAK 40's get four rounds off in 3 mins from stationary locations, all miss. Fury fires several rounds whilst moving, all hits. Such bunch of arse and no wonder some Americans think they won war alone.
Why is the dialogue in modern films just a description of what is happening?
But tanks, brilliant.
Worst tank scene I’ve witnessed in a while. Sadly this garbage is based on a true story. Go learn about the real tank which was called In the Mood and its amazing crew. Also, Brad Pitts characters nickname was War Daddy. Nuff said
Мясорубка
Really poor action scene...... WW2 War films in the 50s were more realistic than this. Why spend so much on all the details of what the guys are wearing and carrying, and then have a poor script?
you forgot it is just a movie... take a pill, or two...
I'm no history buff.. Don't need to be to enjoy this movie.
LOL Remember that time Shermans were equipped with radio speakers and played "working on the railroad" when attacking the enemy!?
Stfu and watch a documentary.
Did they say anything about this movie “based on a real story”. Did any of these character exist in WW2, this movie is made with the purpose of entertainment and yall keyboard historian pushing it like its 1:1 representation of a historical event.
Dude. Half the movies from 60s are fabricated and made up and still fan favorites. People who complain about a action movie set in a historical setting with a made up story are just dumb. ENJOY THE MOVIE!!!
while the aesthetics and the production was stellar but I hate what they did to the enemy, German army in WW2 are not to be messed with. They conquered Europe for a reason. In an open field, Pak are pretty deadly look what happen to eastern front. They didn’t even pop smokes or use their air supremacy ( where they can completely control even before D day). The old war movie like the bridge too far are well known for balance portraying the armies and logistics of each faction and this just hollywood bs cash cow to satisfy their own ego 😂.
That cry baby type later grew older and became a Kamala voter!🤪🤪🤪
🇺🇸🕊️🏅🎖️🫡✝️🪖
😂😂😂
IMHO this is a textbook example of how armor and infantry are supposed to work together. The tank is essentially a mobile pillbox, providing cover and artillery support for the troops moving up behind it.
I remember this scene Former Tanker explain in this clip
watch?v=w1rrz-PHX0c&t=1033s