Karen Read trial: Defense moves to dismiss 2 of 3 charges after mistrial
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
- Two updates came Monday in the Karen Read case, as her attorneys filed a motion to dismiss charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of a deadly crash, and the Massachusetts State Police suspended Trooper Michael Proctor without pay.
Follow NBC10 Boston on...
Instagram: nbc10boston
TikTok: tiktok.com/@nbc10boston
Facebook: NBC10Boston
X: NBC10Boston
Auntie Bev is a joke. Feds should look into her too
@SmokinBlunts781 She clearly hates being there. Or maybe she's just permanently hungover. She likely has a ton of money set aside. Why doesn't she just quit, change her hair, and live in the Hamptons where all of the shadies can have BBQs and drink their faces off.
She needs to be permanently relieved of her duties without pay!
Everything about this trial to me was beyond questionable.
Proctor's investigation was trash. The accident reconstruction guy couldn't reconstruct a collision between a bicycle and a rat.
The more the prosecution folks talk. The more the whole thing smells like a framed up and a cover-up job.
Bingo Bingo. How’s your life now, Trooper.
@@user-qe7ge7qt7u lmso. Good question
Not even between his own shoe 👞 and a cockroach 🪳
DA MORRISEY STATED THEY ARE WAITING FOR THE RETRIAL DATE HEARING SCHEDULE JULY 22 FOR
@@Mrbigg-ck2dk - my daughter tried baking a cake using her own ingredients and refused to follow the recipe. It came out looking like the State’s case. They did not follow the evidence and jammed the narrative “she did it”. Auntie Bev knew their case was weak and tried to tell us this cake taste great!
JUDGE BEV IS AN ACCOMPLICE !,..................
JUDGE BEV NEEDS TO GO. EMOTIONAL, UNPROFESSIONAL, INDOLENT, ACCUSATORY, INCOMPETENT, AND OBVIOUSLY BIASED. SHE CERTAINLY COULD HAVE DONE MORE BEFORE DISMISSING THE JURORS, AS PER THIS REPORT.
@@patti7904 IT IS ONE WACK JOB JUROR YANNETI STATES IT IS A FRIEND OF A FRIEND THAT'S DOUBLE HEARSAY
OK perry mason
@barbaradodge1442 why was the fbi investigating the alberts?
Judge Beverly needs to be investigated for negligence and corruption
Amen. Then disbarred. She is a fool.
She had no idea of the jury split at the time
@@jimmymcdonough9429 And how exactly do you know that for a fact?
JUDGE BEV IS THE CHIEF JUDGE THIS ONE JUROR WITH NO AFFIDAVIT YANNETI HAS A STATEMENT FROM A FRIEND OF A FRIEND THAT'S DOUBLE HEARSAY YANETTI LIED ABOUT SCANLON TURTLEBOY HAS AN INTERVIEW WITH SCANLON HE STATES HE DOESN'T KNOW COLIN BOUNDLESS MILLENNIAL HAS A VIDEO COLIN WHO????
It’s because she is related to the Criminals
This is the most absolute shady " stuff" I've ever heard or seen. The DA, judge, Lally and whomever else is complicit need to go the way of Michael Proctor.
Shady would be A Jackson thinking he is Johnny Cochran 2.0. So obnoxious
@@lowriderlandon4377 JACKSON ISN'T INTELLIGENT THE MOTiONS YANNETI A FRIEND OF A FRIEND DOUBLE HEARSAY JACKSON STATING HE RECEIVED A CALL EVERYONE WHO WAS IN COURT AND SAW THE JURY CALl JACKSON AND SAY I AM A JUROR THEY ARE PISSING JUDGE BEV SHAME ON THEM ANOTHER PUBLICITY STUNT
The judge was biased from the get go. Karen read is innocent
Snobby Beauty, huh?🤔 Hey, Karen.🤩
KR is a disgusting human being. If she isn't guilty she sure behaved like she is. If she is innocent, still a piece of garbage. I guess I can understand her behavior as she was only charged for the murder of a cop and oh yeah he happened to be her boyfriend. I'm sure she was grieving under those smiles during her trial. Let's all support possible killers going free because of incompetent investigators and prosecutor. The fanatic KR supporters are repulsive even if she is innocent. Find a better role model.
A genuine and reasonable reply in contrast to your opinion was removed by this channel. No foul language was used. I'm sure this channel is unbiased
BULLSHIT.
@@shazzaseesamazing the number of people that will take someone’s freedom because they don’t like someone’s face.
Because women are expected to look pleasant and demure at all times…even when facing injustice.
A new and proper investigation is necessary not a retrial.
Yes,we need a prosecutor's that is as much a showboat and BULLY as A.Jackson is.
This trial is a national disgrace!
Absurd
International disgrace.
More like Boston shame. There are no adults in that area. @@bethpatriots7290
And global
Welcome to Massachusetts!!!
The judge was horrible. She was bias’d and didn’t even try to hide it. I hope internal affairs investigates old Bev because she’s shady as the prosecution and investigation. Bye bye Proctor.
I blame Aunti Bev, the Judge I believe she should be called out
Now his wife can Financially support her husband
Lol
Karma has landed at the proctor home
She said she supported him. Now she can support the whole household
@@debbiedavis9904maybe she can call up some bribe money from the McAlberts.
@@debbiedavis9904right?!?!? 😂😂
This is why she didnt poll the jury
Hopefully FBI now go after all the Albert's, McCades
Sadly it’s too late. They got rid of the dog, the house, the cell phone and did work on the basement. Proctor took care of the Mcalberts problem and gave them a free ride. Blame it on the girl. Hope he loses his job, he’s worthless and a woman hater.
Yes, hopefully.. They are MacCabe, with a B not a D ... We don´t want to spell their name wrong once they are in jail, just to make sure their FAME doesn´t go to others... Right?!
@@MonicaEGolak Thank you for correcting me, to my defence I was high, so my apologies to you Monica and the group, and YES they will go to jail😁
@@user-hd7xe7ym4u You should not comment while drinking at The Waterfall 😂
@@MarcosEstremera 🚬😁
You would think a Judge and a DA would want justice to be served.
They do. And justice will be served when Karen Read is convicted
@@bethpatriots7290 Dream on my friend.
@@bethpatriots7290 wow what tunnel vision
An evil world
There was no accident with a vehicle. His injuries were obviously not from a vehicle strike. He was assaulted and carried to the front yard.
And attacked by the dog 🐕
Those Alberts beat the shit out of him, and the damn dog tore his arm up! Bunch of damn thugs in that police force!
OH YES,HE MUST HAVE INBEDDED THE RED TAIL GATE PLASTICS IN HIS OWN SHIRT. WAKE UP
@@lowriderlandon4377you mean the shirt that was in Proctors possession and NOT locked up for days?
How did it cut his skin so many times and not 1 piece of plastic imbedded in the deep wounds.
He was belted in that basement and hit his head down there. Which they didn’t expect to happen.
If they find out that this is true then the judge should be investigated
Why? She read what she was handed by the jury in open court. I didn't hear anything that would suggest a mistrial was the wrong decision
@jimmymcdonough9429 the jury reached unanous verdict on two charges...those verdicts should have been entered...unreal
@@jimmymcdonough9429she needed to ask the question of what and why they were hung ? She’s incompetent and Tainted! Should of never been on this case
@@jimmymcdonough9429 Because she refused to put not guiltily on each charge. Only not guilty on all or guilty on each separately. She yelled at then stormed off when Jackson pointed out the flaw.
There was no way to fill out anything on that form if they decided no 2nd degree murder but hung on one or both of the lessers.
Ya ok listen to the attorney… it’s not true !!!
If you give Jurors a single box to vote on how they vote for 3 seperate charges there is a fundamental flaw in the form.
Lordy.
I don’t think they proved Karen killed John with her car. I would have checked not guilty on all forms.
Your entitled to your opinion,even though it's wrong.
Could this BE any more of a shit show?
Don't think so...very funny comment!😋
Right? Kangaroo Court. Prosecution witnesses were a clown car.
Every time I think that, something else happens & it becomes a shittier shirt show!
YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO POLL IN MASS DID YOU REALIZE TWO LAWYERS ON THE JURY
@@caroljacques4243 and even they could not figure out how to complete Judge Bev's form!
But, Bev is tired, she’ll think about it overnight. 😂😂
::sighhhh:: 🙄😂
Is this Funny? Is there something Funny????😂😂😂😂😂
@@anugillsten5996 alright, we're done 😂
@@JCxox alrighty, you're allllll done
They’re gonna be coming for ya Bev…you did this shit your whole life and now it’s coming back to bite ya
And to think she was a defence lawyer.
JUDGE BEV iS THE CHIEF JUDGE
@@caroljacques4243 Hope she loses the next election now that the constituents see her behaviours
Dethrone the beast
Do we have PROSECUTORIAL & JUDICIAL MUSCONDUCT. ??
The judge gave poor instructions and didn’t poll the jury.
Could be a costly mistake if they retry all the charges.
Shouldnt read's attorneys demanded she poll the jury? It looks like the dropped the ball.
@TB-zc7uz How could they, she rushed to mistral without speaking with either side.
@@christinaanthony5863 it was an abrupt ending
Jurors acquitted Karen on 2 of the 3 charges. She cannot be retried on the 2 charges she was acquitted of
exactly and Bev did not even say it in the court.
@@georgewashington3555 Because the jurors/foreman didn't fill any portion of the verdict form. Also, the notes the foreman sent to the judge indicated they were split on the charges -- plural, not singular as the 3 jurors claim.
the whack job was NOT ACQUITTED
@@ruthx3346 the verdict form did not have a not guilty option for any of the charges. It had one not guilty option at the top of the form which made it confusing to the jurors. They were unanimous on the vote to acquit for second degree murder and leaving the scene but split on manslaughter
@@wygantsh I am well aware of the claims on what the jury had agreed to. I am well aware that the verdict form was amended. I am well aware that the real 'problem' is that the jury was instructed not to fill in the verdict form until they'd reached a unanimous verdict; and that the jury was unsure if they could inform the judge that they had reached a decision in two of the three counts. Jurors never mentioned it in any note the foreman sent the judge. Instead, the jurors were counting on the judge to think to ask if they had decided on any of the counts. As it stands, any agreement the jurors might have had among themselves is still not recognized by the court -- it needs to have an evidentiary hearing on that. So, it's premature to declare as though a done deed that Ms. Read cannot be retried on charges that she was not, and has not been, formally acquitted of.
How would a re trial give justice to John O'Keefe's family if Karen Read is truly innocent??? Throwing an innocent woman in jail?? Makes no sense.
Karen Read killed John O'Keefe
They think she did it.
@@ultratrish you right they do, but .. they could be wrong! I don't think we will ever find out what really happened, unless there is a deathbed confession from someone.
@@ultratrishthey have to claim she did it because they did not gather evidence to support any other theory.
She confessed.
The inverted sallyport video
If these people were in fact involved in the murder of John O'Keefe, then Karen most likely has a target on her back. Proctor has nothing to lose and a hatred for her anyway. I pray she is keeping safe. She probably needs to move eventually.
DIDN'T YOU HEAR THE LAWYER IN COURT STATE BRIAN ALBERT COLIN AlBERT HIGGINS AND PROCTOR ARE NOT UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION THE DEFENSE DIDN'T PROVE THIRD PARTY CULPRIT PLEASE READ THE CASE LAW
Yikes, the "expert" Michael is completely lost. Charge #3 (Leaving the Scene) requires intent, like Charge #1 (Second Degree Murder). THATS why the jury acquitted on those two but were debating the lesser-than charges for #2, as those did not require intent.
Yikes...
Properly, should the jurors have jumped into debating intent without first deciding if the Lexus, the vehicle driven by Ms. Read that night, was indeed the instrument of death? I think many people, myself included, expected that was the top-down approach the jurors would adopt. Clearly, some or all didn't. Wonder whether as a group they'd even discussed a plan of approach.
The judge is either totally unqualified and needs every ruling she has ever hade overturned, or is in on a criminal conspiracy. Which is it?
Good ~ judge biased and if Massachusetts courts put jury forms that have only one place to check for guilty versus a box for guilty and not guilty. I’m sure that there’s a lot of people sitting in jail that should never have been convicted. Why no polling of the jury? If they did not find her guilty of murder to unanimously, you cannot retry her that is double Jeopardy.
The judge needs to be ARRESTED. Any of the corrupt jurors need to be ARRESTED.
Auntie Bev is a nasty, biased judge. She was constantly berating the defence even when they were just trying to make my a record for the transcript. She should not be on this case.
Don’t blame the jurors, the instructions they were given were designed to elicit a guilty finding. This entire case was a sham to begin with and everybody on the prosecution needs to be investigated.
I think the jurors we're confused just like what Jackson argued with the Jugde before jurors started.
The judge changed the form per the demand of AJ! He didn’t care how they had done it in MA forever!!!! Was it more confusing ?
@bevg4087 yes, and according to Bev to complete when done.
Yes and AJ literally had to walk on eggs in his approach to Biased Bev to get her to change the form - she was so mad she yelled at Karen Read. Bev is seriously sick.
@@judithmurduca2073 He wasn’t walking on eggshells during this confrontation! And why was she yelling at KR? She should’ve been sitting silently at the table. But.. she was very active during her trial! At times I know she was telling them what to do!
First, Judge Bev created that problematic form. Second, she instructed the jurors NOT fill in the paper until the end. That’s a huge mistake by the judge. It’s her fault.
Just say the judge didn’t do her job, she didn’t do her job and that’s what you know too and it’s wrong for what they’re doing, but guess what God has the last word for Karen
God has the last word on everybody involved
DA MORRISEY STATED THEY ARE WAITING FOR A DATE FOR RETRIAL HEARING SCHEDULE JULY 22 JENN MCCABE 2 27 AM SEARCH DEBUNKED BY THE CREATOR Of CELLEBRITE GREENE ADMITTED HE USED AN OLD PROGRAM TROOPER GAURINOS TESTIMONY THE GPS DATA SHOWS JOHN O'KEEFE NEVER ENTERED THE HOME PROOF THE SUV. BLACKED ETC
The judge ran out the room
The Law Professor is coming from a Lawyer's viewpoint in that we need justice for John O'Keefe. However, the prosecution has a lot of problems going forward. Look for another hung jury if it is retried. The ARCAA experts stated that scientifically he could not have been hit by her SUV. Also there are the wounds to his arm which reflect large dog bites/scratches. I hope and pray the Feds keep looking for the real killer.
The science and physics says he was not hit by that car period !
Michael “CHIP” Proctaaaaah can’t even ask Chris Albert to work at D&E PIZZA because Chris DOESN’T EVEN PAY HIS BILLS🤣😂🤦🏿😩 THEY ALL WOULD BE BETTER IN JAIL 3 HOTS & a COT!
The verdict form did NOT have a not guilty option for each of the charges it only had one place to check not guilty. It was a SPLIT verdict and it’s the judges fault for not polling the jurors and failing to change the verdict form
How many life long bachelor's would give it up to become a full time dad. I would have been proud to know john...condolences to his family
Why didn’t the jury, at that time, inform the judge, prosecution and defense that there was only 1 charge they couldn’t agree on. Maybe the foreman didn’t want to
Is that true though?
@@judistocker1811 I wondered the same thing.
I was listening live and they did write that so I'm confused 🤔😕 they said NG on 2 charges and split on the last one. Declaring a mistrial so I don't get it right now.
ALL government workers know that when you do business on your personal phone, THEN IT'S FAIR GAME. Procter updated his superiors about the case (supervisors who did NOTHING & deserve the same treatment) on his personal phone. For $225k a year, you'd think he'd be smarter. A defense attorney I know said she watches bodycams carefully to see whether cops use their personal cell- because then it can be subpoenaed
You gotta thank those 10-2 bozos who inadvertently started this!
@@bobbiedeleon4845 Right!!!!
So KR should be retried to have justice for the O'Keefes? So justice is convicting an innocent person??? Really????
GUILTY
If jurors thought that it was an accident and that she didn't know she hit him, that's how they acquit on 2nd degree murder AND leaving the scene. If she didn't know she didn't know she hit him, she didn't know there was a scene to leave.
Leaving a scene does not require intent
There were multiple charges as far as I read in that second question, most people aren't particularly articulate
@GTAMW3. it has to be willful. Regardless, that's not really the point I was making. The speakers were saying it was just impossible to come back with acquitals to 1 and 3. I was simply showing there is easily a way for jurors to conclude that. But I don't think any of that matters. Physics proved that the victim wasn't hit by her vehicle, and many people believe she's guilty.
@@lisakay8798 so if I didn’t know I killed someone should I not be held responsible?
@@GTAMW3. if that's what you got from my response, a conversation isn't possible. Have a good one!
Isn't the fore person responsible for checking the boxes?
And didn't auntie Bev pick the fore person????
Wasn't the fore owrson hand picked, by who? Oh yes, (the judge). Wow.
@@astrialindah2773 Bingo!
Foreman was well educated with letters sent - almost lawyerly. Something smells corrupt. Bev confusing forms with not being checked. Par for course with this case.
@@janetcole4463yes hand picked by Bev prior to the jury alternates being released guaranteeing that juror a seat on the jury.
Well people need to listen to the 911 call again because Jenny knew he was dead before she even got out of the car. She told that dispatcher 3 Times “ he’s dead, I think he’s dead, he’s dead “. Face down, he got out of the car and it was a couple hours ago meaning 2-3 hours from 6 am
Jenny knows he was dead because she knows who placed him in the snow
@@InconitoBandito Bingo!
Judge didn't ask the attorney's opinions before ruling on mistrial!she did say very quickly mistrial!!!at least she would have dismissed those 1and 3 charges!!for next trial it would help!WHY DID NOT !!!
Biased Bev sure didn’t show she was tired when she declared a mistrial- rather quickly eh?
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES NEED TO BE MADE FOR TRIALS WITH MULTIPLE CHARGES....polling jururs should have been done before dismissal
@@anna.banana.075 they dont have to poll in mass unless a lawyer requests to. They snoozed and losed. 😉
VOTE BEV OUT OF OFFICE
SHE IS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL
Judge Cannone was hostile to the Defense throughout, and especially on the Charge Slips. The Daybell trial the Judge always worked cooperatively with both sides to approve everything that went to the Jury.
Make it confusing for regular people. Because they think the citizens are stupid
And now Aunt Bev wants to impound the jury list? WTAF?
What does that mean?
It's normal, the same as sealing the record.
This biased judge will NEVER make any ruling in favor of the defense
And the Sh** Sh** continues, the only thing they have to do is contact the Jury Forman, the judge knew this but wanted to declare a mistrial because she didn’t like those two verdicts, Karen won’t do any time because the judge committed the crime, lock up Auntie Bev! 😂😂😂😂😂
Yo your legal expert is not one about this. The 1st & 3rd charges required the jury to find intent from Karen, unlike the 2nd charge. So it makes complete sense why they’d easily rule 1 & 3 not guilty right off the bat if none of them believe she intentionally hit him (or that she didn’t hit him at all).
Good job with the ending tribute to murder victim John O'Keefe at the end
Agree. We need to see more of that❤
VOTE CANONE OUT OF OFFICE ASAP
Guys, to compliment that the judge did a good job is insulting to your audience’s intelligence. Please stop. She was horrible and ANYONE who watched this trial agrees. She’s the worst most rude, biased and just incompetent judge I’ve ever seen.
Proctor and other cops need to follow the Law. If not, go to jail
Yes, losing his salary isn't enough. He should b e in prison for the length of time Karen spent if she would have been found guilty. I
He makes me sick to even look at him so sad. His life family in dire straights now. Judge is crooked too. Make her a witness now.
Charge 3 required the CW to prove 6 elements, of which, the 3rd element required KR to "knowingly" leave the scene of a crime. If they thought she caused his injury but didn't realize it, she would NOT be guilty on Charge 3. That's how it could be hung on Charge 2 (manslaughter) and unanimous on Charge 3 (leaving the scene).
Jurors,
Please come out and confirm this! This is a human being’s life. If this was YOU, wouldn’t you pray the jurors who believed you were not guilty would come out and say that? ❤
They should charge the rest of the withness to who was drinking that night to while driving
First trial ENDED in a mistrial and no new charges have been officially brought against Karen Read yet , so essentially they are looking to have nonexistent charges dropped
Botched investigation
Botched prosecution
Botched trial
Corrupt. How can everyone ask how this could be?!... corruption!
What an embarrassment!!
System needs an overhaul
Even Alan Jackson argued with the Judge over that form.
The jury instructions and jury form were about as clear as mud it’s no wonder the jury were confused.
It was split verdict Jury couldn’t agree on all three counts Wasn’t mistrial
Aunty Bev is no good
This is why a lot of people are going to UA-cam for their news because they get an accurate breakdown as to what EXACTLY happened!! You asked your guest if the defense could have asked for a breakdown of what the verdict slip actual said, as if the reason the defense didn’t find out about there being some charges their client was acquitted of was all their fault!. If ANY of you actually read the document Jackson and Yannetti filed, it said CLEARLY that they asked the judge to let them look at the note and also to be able to discuss what the verdict slip said! This biased judge, in my opinion, told them NO on both requests! She just outright refused to let them see the verdict slip, which Attorney Mark Bederow stated, NEVER has happened to him in 26 years of practicing! Again, you “journalist”, evidently don’t read thoroughly, what you’re talking about, otherwise you’d be aware of these facts and not state things to the public as if the attorneys didn’t know enough to ask to see the verdict slip! This judge is biased and has been from the day she was asked to recuse herself and refused, based on her family connections with the Albert family! I wonder if you even know what I’m referring to!
Shame on you for NOT fully investigating before reporting on a story and also allowing guests to come on your show who know as little as you seem to! DO BETTER!! 😤
Timestamp ( 7:35 ) Listen!
Also, I have to wonder if your guest even watched ANY of the trial! To say the Commonwealth needs to retry the case because they need to get “justice” for the O’Keefe family, is just as ridiculous as the rest of ALL his prior statements have been! True justice does not come from putting an innocent woman behind bars and if your guest had any common sense, or truly watched the trial, he would know that!
Shameful!! 🤦🏾♀️
RIP 🪦 Officer John O’Keefe
🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️
#FreeKarenRead 👚🩷👚🩷
You are rediculous. UA-camrs report so called news to get likes and clicks and to influence people. The more subscribers the more MONEY they get
🐢 and others have jumped on the bandwagon and 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣all the way to the bank
The fact that Bev told the jury that if the written instructions if different from what she gave them verbally..why would there be more then one set of instructions to begin with? Looks intentional that she was trying to confuse them,and cause problems.along with her behavior during the trial..hard to trust her
The jury foreman is the one that is primarily at fault here. The notes that he wrote to the judge at no time gave the impression that they had reached a verdict on any of the charges. Like Troopers Proctor and Bukanik, his focus was elsewhere.
The letter did say charges. The judge should have asked a simple question
Are you at an impasse on all 3 charges? Jurors also could have or should have specified. Its like they were caught up emotionally and were not able to think logically what their job was including definition of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why isn’t any body blaming the judge for this
I also think the jury thought more about the messages to the judge then they did deliberating on the case
Judge Bev professing to be so familiar with the ‘lesser includeds’ never thought to ask the jury on what counts they were divided on?
If it’s always this way in Massachusetts, then why didn’t Bev catch this?
What happens in the jury room.remains in the jury room
What a disgrace!
They all have immunity, but they could be replaced. Governor needs to act on this mess or is she just all mouth, no action. Her chance to show the people of MA., She cares about her state.
You would think this was the first murder trial ever conducted in Massachusetts
What is extremely annoying is that this was incredibly foreseeable.
The defence pointed out that there no way to find no guilty on individual charges. The defence asked for each charge to have a guilty/not guilty. They likely should have argued at the hung stage to have direction on if all the charges were hung or just some. Because the jury only had the option for guilty on 1, 2, or 3. Or not guilty on all. There WAS no was to indicate not guilty on 1 but hung on either 2 or 3.
I think this is likely irretrievable for the defence and no long timely. They agree to the verdict for change. They should never have compromised with the judge because then they could have appealed for sure. She didn’t allow for hanging on certain charges but deciding others.
It will be interesting to see how she rules for a hearing and argument.
Judge is an Accomplice!......
This trial has been an abomination!!! Is there an end to the amount of corruption with this case!!!!!?????? From the police to the judge - they all need investigated!! Unbelievable!!!
Wrong, the verdict form did not have Not Guilty spots to check.
I went back and listened to Jackson's objection and the final ruling.
They were hung on the drunk driving charge. The deeply held convictions was about drinking and driving. Did yall even read the letters both defense attorneys submitted?
She should have polled the jury and avoided all this. She's a terribly biased judge, I haven't seen anything like it.
Did the judge even look at the actual verdict slip before declaring a mistrial? It seems like she was handed a note from the jury that said they remained deadlocked, and after reading it she immediately delivered her little speech and ended the trial. But the note almost certainly (1) was not the verdict slip, and (2) didn't specify they were deadlocked on one charge, but were unanimous on the other two.
I think the jury (some of them) thought she accidentally hit him without realizing and then left not knowing he was hit. She didn’t leave him on purpose, therefore not guilty.
This judge should be put on trial for her life and they need to give her a judge that was just like she was in court. The judge did this on purpose and everyone knows this to be true. How are you going to put her through this again after the trooper was punished. This is a joke
She did it!! Attorney tried to sell the jury a fairytale!! Glad they did not buy it!!
WHAT IS CONFUSING ASWELL: I got a Not Guilty for Disqualified Driving, but I Got Found on Dangerous Driving..?? =18 month
Why does John O'Keefe's brother seem to have so much animosity toward him? He acts like he had no love for John!
Regarding the third count, perhaps they were coming up with not guilty for the leaving the scene because nobody could prove how much alcohol was in her system. Isn’t that the last part of that charge… Being under the influence?
The OK family deserves the truth as to what happened to their son, brother, loved one. I don’t think they got it from the DAs side, and I don’t think they’re going to get to the truth until a proper investigation is done on all parties involved!
Funny, in most cases I’ve heard, the judge offers polling. Also, most judges address each charge individually… 🤔
So he would recharge, but not on the fact that she did it. He would recharge for the family. But not on the fact that she did it
Why are they even pursuing it again cw didnt prove their case going to be a waste of tax payers money again. . Pursuing the wrong person. She innocent. Go after the cops jfc