Karen Read trial: Lawyer says jury voted to acquit on murder charge | LiveNOW from FOX

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • Lawyers for the suspected Boston cop killer Karen Read said Monday that jurors in her trial over the death of John O'Keefe had an "agreement" to find her not guilty before the judge declared a mistrial.
    The 44-year-old Read's trial ended after five days of deliberations last week when Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial over what jurors described as their inability to come to a unanimous verdict, however.
    Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! ua-cam.com/users/livenowfox?su...
    Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox.com/
    Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
    Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 175

  • @Lotuslaful
    @Lotuslaful 13 днів тому +70

    The judge was clearly biased

    • @bethpatriots7290
      @bethpatriots7290 13 днів тому +1

      Ridiculous

    • @zonker845
      @zonker845 12 днів тому +4

      Yes she bent over backwards for the defense. I hope they get a different judge for a second trial. Most aren't as defensie friendly

    • @PEBBLEZ21
      @PEBBLEZ21 11 днів тому

      Absolutely not!

    • @PEBBLEZ21
      @PEBBLEZ21 11 днів тому +2

      @@zonker845good one.

    • @meansnowflake
      @meansnowflake 11 днів тому

      Agreed. It was obvious just from the few hours of trial I watched.

  • @m5sunflower665
    @m5sunflower665 13 днів тому +58

    What the hell is up with that judge? Come on is everyone there corrupt ??

    • @jcran8352
      @jcran8352 13 днів тому +5

      Yes everybody!!!

    • @ErnieBert-eg8kd
      @ErnieBert-eg8kd 12 днів тому +1

      That’s Massachusetts police, da’s and judges for you.

    • @moniqueengleman873
      @moniqueengleman873 11 днів тому

      There are more corrupt judges than service oriented judges.
      They set her up. She was framed.

    • @polivepea
      @polivepea 11 днів тому

      Yes

    • @georgewashington3555
      @georgewashington3555 10 днів тому

      Judge is connected with Morrissey... their mothers worked together their whole lives.. JUdge is connected to Alberts.. Judges Brother was a Defense attorney for Chris Albert, when he hit a man with a car. there is probably more.

  • @lulubells930
    @lulubells930 12 днів тому +23

    Corrupt judge. Corrupt. All of them.

  • @gdenny1748
    @gdenny1748 12 днів тому +14

    Yeah, of course auntie Bev did that. She shouldn’t have been on the case in the first place her ties to the cops round too deep!

  • @m5sunflower665
    @m5sunflower665 13 днів тому +37

    You have to wonder about any investigation Proctors ever ever done . He’s ill equipped to assist the public ever .

    • @ErnieBert-eg8kd
      @ErnieBert-eg8kd 12 днів тому +2

      The guy is a clown and only got his job through nepotism. The main resume requirements to be a Massachusetts state police officer.

    • @georgewashington3555
      @georgewashington3555 10 днів тому

      Judge is equally compromised. judges mother .. has worked with Da Michael Morrisey Mother her whole life. So its like a family affair . Judges Brother was a Defense Attorney for Chris Albert when he hit a man with a car. So its a Family Circus of Corruption here. Judge= da morrissey -Alberts, and corrupt cops.

  • @4evagrace789
    @4evagrace789 13 днів тому +53

    Corrupt judge

    • @bethpatriots7290
      @bethpatriots7290 13 днів тому +1

      Absurd

    • @chrisgoz7673
      @chrisgoz7673 12 днів тому +3

      ​@@bethpatriots7290who? Aunt Bev? Gotta watch the trial. It was wild.

    • @PEBBLEZ21
      @PEBBLEZ21 11 днів тому +3

      Yeah she really let the defense get away with their sliminess…

    • @PEBBLEZ21
      @PEBBLEZ21 11 днів тому +1

      @@chrisgoz7673she your aunt? Disrespectful Karen cultist.

    • @zonker845
      @zonker845 10 днів тому +1

      She gave the defense a lot of leeway she didn't have to

  • @coldisle
    @coldisle 12 днів тому +6

    This judge was clearly biased and showed real contempt towards the defense lawyers. This is just another effort on her part to sabotage justice and slant it towards the prosecution. Watching her run a courtroom was excruciating and she should not be allowed anywhere near a potential retrial. I really think she should be disbarred after her hideous handling of this case.

  • @deerobin257
    @deerobin257 12 днів тому +19

    Judge needs to be taken on review or whatever is done about judges like this in USA. She was just ridiculous.

    • @zonker845
      @zonker845 10 днів тому

      The judge was very accommodating to the defense. I think the prosecution should try to get a different judge

    • @flynneart1111
      @flynneart1111 9 днів тому

      Judicial misconduct

  • @quicklikefox69
    @quicklikefox69 11 днів тому +6

    What the hell is it with all these corrupt judges lately! WTF!

    • @Macsauce313
      @Macsauce313 11 днів тому

      Lately??? They have always been like this

  • @lifesabeach8133
    @lifesabeach8133 12 днів тому +11

    Just when you thought it was over... this defense team is incredibly tenacious! I'm a pretty smart cookie but listening to Bev's instructions to the jury regarding the verdict forms made my head spin. That form was confusing ON PURPOSE. Even the minor correction made in light of the defense's objections did not fix that. Bev wanted KR convicted of SOMETHING, that was clear. I can't even use the word "judge" in conjunction with Bev's name, doesn't seem right. It stinks to high heaven that she hand picked the foreperson, who then sent a very important note to the judge without running it past the rest of the jury. Not a good look. We need to change KR's name to Patsy because that's what she is to all the cops, the judge and even JO's family. At this point it's irrelevant whether she actually committed the crimes she's charged with... the evidence presented in no way even proves JO was struck by a vehicle, and the lead prosecutor grossly misconducted the whole investigation.

    • @zonker845
      @zonker845 10 днів тому

      It's a standard form used in Massachusetts

  • @m5sunflower665
    @m5sunflower665 13 днів тому +32

    I knew she was not guilty
    Clearly Johns arm was attacked by a dog, many experts said so but just look at his arm and who beat him up? Who had training to do that kind of damage to another human ? Get investigating what truly happened NOW

    • @barbaradodge1442
      @barbaradodge1442 13 днів тому +3

      she was not acquitted

    • @bethpatriots7290
      @bethpatriots7290 13 днів тому +2

      Your discernment skills need much improvement. You will be very embarrassed when the actual evidence is discussed

    • @eyeamme1917
      @eyeamme1917 13 днів тому +11

      I don't know if I agree that he was beat, but the science showed us he definitely wasn't hit by a car. Unless you're looking to contest physics as a whole, you gotta admit he wasn't hit by a car.

    • @Gle7799
      @Gle7799 12 днів тому +2

      If he was attacked by chloe johns arm would
      be in much worse shape

    • @mustangecoboosthpp3869
      @mustangecoboosthpp3869 12 днів тому +6

      @@Gle7799 You clearly do not know dog bites, those dog bites a dog will bite and hold it gripe and those are they type of marks that are made.

  • @mustangecoboosthpp3869
    @mustangecoboosthpp3869 12 днів тому +27

    This judge is either corrupt or incompetent or maybe both.

    • @PEBBLEZ21
      @PEBBLEZ21 11 днів тому +2

      She did nothing wrong. Are you a judge?

    • @Macsauce313
      @Macsauce313 11 днів тому +1

      Did nothing wrong? 😂😂😂
      The judge wants a conviction, the prosecutor wants a conviction. Not guilty verdict on 2 charges including the 2nd degree murder which is the charge they want to stick

    • @PEBBLEZ21
      @PEBBLEZ21 11 днів тому

      @@Macsauce313 the prosecutor wants a conviction, yes. the judge? The judge runs the courtroom..she is for what the jury decides..let’s hold the phone on the jury wanting not guilty on two charges. It’s pure speculation at this point. 2 jurors and 2 friends of friends of jurors have so called said this but is it true? The way you Karen read cultists are 68 people saying she did it isn’t enough so how is 2? Let it play out but if true manslaughter is still on the table and in MA up to 20 years in prison. I think it was 2nd degree but we can retry on just manslaughter..fine with me.

  • @Objection_23and1
    @Objection_23and1 12 днів тому +5

    This judge is SUS AF 🥴

  • @darshaniweerapura3108
    @darshaniweerapura3108 13 днів тому +16

    That is amazing news 😮

  • @Richard-lp9lz
    @Richard-lp9lz 12 днів тому +5

    I couldn’t handle a miss trial. I don’t even want a not guilty. If it was me. I would need the jury to come back with I would want A mattock moment and found completely innocent.

  • @Gle7799
    @Gle7799 12 днів тому +13

    Hopefully proctor will be fired at end of his process

    • @ErnieBert-eg8kd
      @ErnieBert-eg8kd 12 днів тому

      It’s looking that way. He’s been relieved of duty and suspended without pay. The guy is cooked the only future he has is being a security guard at a mall

  • @wendystandiford7676
    @wendystandiford7676 12 днів тому +3

    I am hearing, during Canton select board, it was announced that Kevin Albert was put on leave because of investigation of case he worked with proctor.

  • @Marvelous-lm9nv
    @Marvelous-lm9nv 12 днів тому +3

    That judge was supposed to recuse herself because she was friends with the true killers. Karen should have been acquitted because she is inoccent.

    • @Luvlacek3
      @Luvlacek3 11 днів тому +1

      Omg😂😂yall will believe anything smh 🤦🏼‍♀️🙄

  • @gb3376
    @gb3376 12 днів тому +18

    The judge was problematic from the beginning

  • @kgraham5820
    @kgraham5820 12 днів тому +10

    If you think about it, a judge usually addresses each count individually but during the reading of the letter, she never mentions WHICH charge(s) they were unable to come to a decision. After reading that portion, she lowers the doc and declares the mistrial. Again, making no mention of which charges specifically, that was either brilliant on her part or very dumb. The jury should be called back in…

    • @margy1884
      @margy1884 12 днів тому +2

      She declared a mistrial in 2 seconds!!!!
      What chance did the defense have?

    • @zonker845
      @zonker845 10 днів тому

      Not true and the note said charges plural. It was read in front of the jury.
      Now a couple FKR jurors want to rewrite the deliberations after the fact. Typical for her supporters. They all lie

    • @zonker845
      @zonker845 10 днів тому +2

      They could have objected immediately.
      They asked for a mistrial after the first note. They were afraid it was a single hold out for Karen

    • @margy1884
      @margy1884 10 днів тому

      @@zonker845 I didn’t t see a second in which they could have objected. She read the final note from the Foreperson that the defense did not get to read then she immediately released them.
      If you read Mass. Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 27. Verdicts. There were other ways for the Judge to handle multiple count verdicts. The laws is very clear.

    • @zonker845
      @zonker845 10 днів тому +1

      How long does it take to say I object. The defense was pushing for a mistrial. Also the jury note said charges plural if you paid attention

  • @GFlCh
    @GFlCh 12 днів тому +3

    I heard from another news video, that the verdict form only had checkboxes for [x] Guilty for each charge, so they had no way to express "Not-Guilty" for each of the charges, other than leaving the charge "un-checked".

    • @bethmccrae2714
      @bethmccrae2714 7 днів тому

      False. The verdict sheet was published

  • @jaynepetersen454
    @jaynepetersen454 13 днів тому +9

    Thats bs, nothing was decided because it was a mistrial. New trial, new jury, sequestered, change of venue!

    • @mustangecoboosthpp3869
      @mustangecoboosthpp3869 12 днів тому +8

      Trials all the time come back with some charges acquitted and maybe a charge deadlocked and the acquitted charges are over. Educated yourself. This judge is a disgrace.

    • @Krystal_Kleer
      @Krystal_Kleer 12 днів тому +3

      Yes. New venue, sequester the jury.

    • @margy1884
      @margy1884 12 днів тому +1

      Make Judge Bev a witness and she is gone on the retrial on 2 nd count or the CW just dismisses all together. What if Proctor has charges against him by that time and maybe more Troopers go down?

    • @jaynepetersen454
      @jaynepetersen454 12 днів тому +1

      @mustangecoboosthpp3869 it's up to the prosecutor to decide charges, not the judge. Double jeopardy only applies if you are found innocent, doesn't matter what this previous jury decided on the charges

    • @mustangecoboosthpp3869
      @mustangecoboosthpp3869 11 днів тому

      @@jaynepetersen454 Wow, educate yourself, once a jury acquits you of a charge the prosecutor can't recharge it. If this jury had in fact had all 12 members were in agreement that Karen Read did not commit two oc the charges then the prosecutor can't recharge them. The judge in this case made a reversible error on the jury form that was brought to her attention before the case was turned over to the jury and the Defense brought if up, that was the judge did not include a box for not guilty, this judge wanted a conviction and she rigged the jury form to get a conviction and now that same form is going to bite the judge in the arse.

  • @ellenw391
    @ellenw391 11 днів тому +3

    N0w a 4th Juror reached out. As a Norfolks Co. resident, whose tax $$$$ have gone to multiple depts of this SShow, can we please discuss that aspect of it. We all knew it wasn't all Unicorns & Ponies here, but never in my worst nightmare did I expect to see Troopers like Proctor behaving like that on the regular. And Lally is our best & brightest to put people away? Auntie Bev is our best & brightest? I could keep going on and on and ooooon. Just can't leave out the "investigation" stopping as soon as they found a home belonging to a police officer was done. In what universe is that OK??
    And why did I only hear that a former MA Trooper has been trying to get the state to open an investigation into horrific misdeeds of the State Police, and even after this fiasco, it still has not been opened. I want my tax dollar back as I never agreed to this lawless miscarriage of justice!!!! Please let's get a series going on that!!!

  • @jeffwilliams3452
    @jeffwilliams3452 12 днів тому +3

    There will be+a second trial guaranteed!

    • @sunchips5
      @sunchips5 11 днів тому +1

      Not unless the CW of MA wants to show how over-the-top inept they are.

  • @inthewoodshed9611
    @inthewoodshed9611 13 днів тому +4

    This is like the SEC and madoff.

  • @lulubells930
    @lulubells930 12 днів тому +6

    What you think the jurors are gonna lie about that???

    • @jessferrell9479
      @jessferrell9479 11 днів тому

      They have nothing to gain by lying about this or anything.

  • @jeninga1976-v3s
    @jeninga1976-v3s 12 днів тому +2

    If the Jurors didn't check off the NG on the Murder 2 charge and sign it, then do we know if their deliberation was complete on that charge? Looking forward to see how this unfolds on the 22nd.

  • @wensday21
    @wensday21 11 днів тому +3

    The world is watching

  • @user-bk7yo8vu9k
    @user-bk7yo8vu9k 11 днів тому +1

    This whole trial is been a s*** show if those were dog bites on his arms were did they come from and what about the Apple Health Data

  • @isabelferreira6660
    @isabelferreira6660 12 днів тому +3

    Double jeopardy means?

    • @ErnieBert-eg8kd
      @ErnieBert-eg8kd 12 днів тому

      Can’t be charged with the same crime twice

  • @Bloodborn420
    @Bloodborn420 12 днів тому +2

    Imagine that the judge being courpt

  • @PEBBLEZ21
    @PEBBLEZ21 11 днів тому +2

    Bull…motion is garbage.

  • @truecrime98
    @truecrime98 6 днів тому

    Thank you for referring to Officer John O’Keefe as Officer John O’Keefe! We need to keep it real. Boston police officer was murdered!! we all in Massachusetts want justice for officer John O’Keefe!! Free Karen Read!!!

  • @kennethpaulsen5407
    @kennethpaulsen5407 8 днів тому +1

    hope they charge her again

  • @kateskeys
    @kateskeys 12 днів тому +1

    All on both sides should be in rehab

  • @Gle7799
    @Gle7799 12 днів тому +4

    They will retry the case . Its reality

  • @zonker845
    @zonker845 13 днів тому +9

    "Abruptly" declared a mistrial, she sent them back 2 times. The reporting on this case is abysmal

    • @stevenprice6957
      @stevenprice6957 13 днів тому +3

      Nothing was filled out lol. It was 9-3 of guilty for manslaughter or so we are being told. It’s like hear say. Lol.

    • @iBlueClovr
      @iBlueClovr 13 днів тому +6

      She abruptly declared a mistrial because she did not clarify on what charges the jury had or hadnt reached a verdict on and didnt allow time for the attorneys to speak on the situation

    • @lilithstribe
      @lilithstribe 13 днів тому +2

      In fairness, she could have sent them back one additional. As it now stands she probably should have.

    • @iBlueClovr
      @iBlueClovr 13 днів тому +6

      @lilithstribe it's not about sending them back it's about not seeing what they concluded for each charge. She abruptly declared a mistrial on all charges instead of going over what they jury had found for each charge or allowing the attorneys a say

    • @lydiabuchanan9462
      @lydiabuchanan9462 13 днів тому +2

      @@stevenprice6957 I’m pretty sure it was 8/4..I read the affidavit

  • @jessferrell9479
    @jessferrell9479 11 днів тому +4

    The judge had to have seen the paperwork from the jury where they filled out not guilty on 2 counts. There’s no way she didn’t, she still went ahead & declared a mistrial. She’s just as CORRUPT OR MORE AS ALL OF THE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN THIS CASE 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

    • @marciawade8813
      @marciawade8813 10 днів тому

      Judge Aunti Bev barred them from filling out any part... only the whole.

  • @margy1884
    @margy1884 12 днів тому +2

    These Jurors need to speak out! Hide their faces while doing it or get in touch with the Defense. What was 8 weeks of your lives for if your vote does not count? What a slap in the face!

  • @Reneepetrucci-fl3ww
    @Reneepetrucci-fl3ww 11 днів тому +4

    What a dumpster fire.. this is on the judge! How do you not ask if they are in agreement with any of the charges! I was yelling at TV.. why aren’t you asking them about each count.. Bev needs to just step down.. embarrassing to say the least!! Do Better MA!

  • @Luvlacek3
    @Luvlacek3 11 днів тому +3

    Wow the defense is the lowest of the lowest. They’re such liars. 🤮

  • @user-vy8zs5xz2t
    @user-vy8zs5xz2t 9 днів тому

    Auntie Bev was conflicted.

  • @bethmccrae2714
    @bethmccrae2714 7 днів тому

    Karen Read is guilty

  • @redcharm6173
    @redcharm6173 11 днів тому +3

    I knew from the beginning the judge was biased and now she’s being exposed. Good.

  • @carolyncollins7859
    @carolyncollins7859 8 днів тому

    Ya Pita!!

  • @flynneart1111
    @flynneart1111 9 днів тому

    See the movie spotlight? This disgusting place

  • @flynneart1111
    @flynneart1111 9 днів тому +1

    Dethrone the beast

  • @Laakona
    @Laakona 13 днів тому +10

    But, in the judge's defense, she IS a blond!

  • @bethpatriots7290
    @bethpatriots7290 11 днів тому +1

    ZERO jurors have submitted affidavits

  • @alfmagoo
    @alfmagoo 13 днів тому +2

    If she was a man, they would keep trying him until they got a unanimous jury.

    • @eyeamme1917
      @eyeamme1917 13 днів тому +3

      I love seeing people fail to divide men and women on a serious issue. If she were a man, no one would persecute her for not crying the whole time or for speaking with conviction.

  • @Gle7799
    @Gle7799 12 днів тому +3

    Jacksons been nerrvous about manslaughter option since he brought up the vardict form issue. That waa also a hale mary tactic aa well.

  • @TheeJosephSantos
    @TheeJosephSantos 13 днів тому +6

    She is not guilty! Booooo!

    • @jcran8352
      @jcran8352 13 днів тому +1

      Ya - Don't let the facts get in your way!!!!!!! Welcome to the most woke, most corrupt State there is!!!!! You people who live there pay for this crap each day!!!! And rightfully so, this one may end up costing more than $100,000,000.00

  • @melissadawn7042
    @melissadawn7042 13 днів тому +6

    Trump 24

    • @louisdimaggio1517
      @louisdimaggio1517 13 днів тому +3

      GFY

    • @capecodder04
      @capecodder04 13 днів тому +3

      ​@@louisdimaggio1517
      Trump 24 for 4 more!
      GFY

    • @NPCHSN
      @NPCHSN 13 днів тому

      Trump will win for the third straight time.

    • @ErnieBert-eg8kd
      @ErnieBert-eg8kd 12 днів тому

      @@louisdimaggio1517if you are a man and a democrat you gotta be a 🌈 momo

  • @Gle7799
    @Gle7799 12 днів тому +1

    Hale mary move.

  • @stevenprice6957
    @stevenprice6957 13 днів тому +6

    Karen days after the crime in Court . It was an accident and I didn’t think I hit him that hard. My client loved this man. 12:31. Crazy reversal at speed. Impact consistent with a pedestrian hit. John’s phone does not move again until 6;15. But let’s go back. Rings 4 times in the following minutes as she’s speeding to John’s. 12:37. John I fu-king hate you click. Haha. 12:42 once she takes johns car out of his garage and puts hers in with the damaged tail light she is heard stomping up and down like your everyday psychopath 😂. No words spoken. Minutes later. John where are you? Lol. Nobody knows where you are ? Umm didn’t you just drop him off 🤔 nobody knows where you are ?? Wt ? Karen are you ok 😂 Rings daddy all night as most 40 year olds do.
    5am johns dead click. 5;01 it’s the ploughs fault click. Oh I left him at the waterfall 🤔. Drives out of johns garage and as anybody with eyes can see , a busted tail light.
    Give it up seriously. This is actually hilarious.
    Days later oh the Alberts killed him. A 17 year old that my daughter could beat, killed John. Then they pulverised my tail light lol. Where Karen ? At 34 Fairview lol. Or did they break into johns garage at 3am lol. Which one is it haha.

    • @Luckylaurie777
      @Luckylaurie777 13 днів тому +4

      She is one of the luckiest murderers I’ve ever seen. Also, she has impressive eye sight. How did she see John? “There he is!” The other two women saw nothing. They watched her run to a lump of snow.

    • @stevenprice6957
      @stevenprice6957 13 днів тому +2

      @@Luckylaurie777no one saw anything including people walking to the driveway which in fairness is on the other side of the property. But yeah what about the countless cars driving past all night ? No one seen her. She is very lucky the police were sloppy. One bagged her in private convos with mates and what’s even more in her favour is the conspiracies Americans love them. They eat them for breakfast.

    • @JeezItsJenii
      @JeezItsJenii 13 днів тому +1

      I’d be surprised the accidents that happen to normal people that are angry and drunk. She overdid it. Orrrrr she got framed. Nothing adds up. Either way. I’m so confused.

    • @stevenprice6957
      @stevenprice6957 13 днів тому

      @@JeezItsJeniiyou cannot frame someone where the evidence was already in before any one arrived. We see it on camera. You can’t change GPS. You cannot change car data. Look at what the defence doesn’t attempt to defend. It’s tells a story in its self. Kerry Roberts. GPS car data. the works. They’ve had to make up things and hope to confuse and raise doubt. As well as getting the public on board before the trial even started with baseless rubbish. It should be aloud to be honest. People like Melanie little and tadpole boy or whatever it’s called. Disgusting humans. Pushing agendas. Now the clicks are big so everyone wants a piece of it. Just make it up as you go. Even when debunked they continued to push agendas. Should be Laws and rules. Taints jury’s too as we’ve already seen.

    • @JRay.R
      @JRay.R 13 днів тому +5

      Relax and please get your facts right, please. One thing the public chaos around this case doesn’t need is more baseless accusations being stated as fact.
      There are NO TIMES attached to the key cycle/ignition cycle data…so you saying that she “reversed at speed” at a specific time (12:31am) is not exactly correct.
      Also “impact consistent with a pedestrian hit” seeeeeerrriously assumes facts that should not be assumed based on that data alone.
      I’m also just totally confused about why you’d be so confident parroting the theories testified to by Trooper Paul.
      Just because the Commonwealth decided he was their best option to call as an expert to testify, doesn’t necessarily mean he was correct in all his claims. Assuming his testimony is true and/or accurate is a mistake.
      Last thing I’ll mention…ring video was shown in trial of John O’keefe’s SUV being pulled out of the garage and parked in the driveway, in the exact same spot it was parked when KR backed into it, hours later.
      The video is from before John left to go to the bar that night, and John parked the SUV there himself.
      Karen backed into John’s SUV around 5am as she left to go find him.
      Claiming this was purposeful or calculated or that it otherwise proves that KR is guilty of the charges she’s facing is not true and not helpful to anyone who reads it.

  • @Richard-lp9lz
    @Richard-lp9lz 12 днів тому

    I couldn’t handle a miss trial. I don’t even want not guilty it it was me. I would need the jury to come back with I would want A mattock moment and found completely innocent.