Karen Read attorneys file motion to dismiss charges in murder trial
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 лип 2024
- Karen Read's attorneys filed a motion to dismiss two of the three charges against her after a judge declared a mistrial.
Subscribe to ABC News on UA-cam: abcnews.visitlink.me/59aJ1G
ABC News Digital is your daily source of breaking national and world news, exclusive interviews and 24/7 live streaming coverage.
Download the ABC News app for the latest headlines and alerts: abcnews.go.com/devices
Watch 24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events on ABC News Live: • LIVE: Latest News Head...
Watch full episodes of World News Tonight with David Muir here: • ABC World News Tonight...
Read ABC News reports online: abcnews.go.com
ABC News is the home to the #1 evening newscast “World News Tonight” with David Muir, “Good Morning America,” “20/20,” “Nightline,” “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos, “ABC News Live Prime” with Linsey Davis, plus the daily news podcast “Start Here.”
Connect with ABC News on social media:
Facebook: / abcnews
Instagram: / abcnews
TikTok: / abcnews
X: / abc
Threads: www.threads.net/@abcnews
LinkedIn: / abcnews
It was obvious the judge was on the states side
Exactly so obviouse!
@@bennyblanco6704 Put judge Cannone and ex- Trooper Proctor in jail like they tried to do to Karen! Jeff D.
IF she is guilty of oui alcohol, then so is anyone else who left that bar and drove to the Albert,s home that night!
@@colleenmcnamaradusti4861yep but it wasn’t even a change in its own right and given the way the “investigation” was conducted and they couldn’t even prove she was over limit, they would struggle to convict!
💯 from day one IMO
Judge Bev needs to be investigated and suspended too!🚩
🎉🎉🎉🎉
Judge is an Accomplice !
Yeah Right!!
Maybe big foot is too
Reed was laughing at how incompetent the judge is as we all were
When Bev gets mad it’s “ we’re done” she’s the rudest human for a judge
Judge is biased she snapped because jury wasn’t buying her rudeness
4 jurors now
The jurors aquit Karen on 1 and 3, judge did not tell anyone she said “ mistrial only” if she doesn’t dismiss 1 and 3, it’s a big issue . Judges verdict paper confused everyone including many other lawyers . Judge rapidly read them again and again and overwhelmed everyone
You think it was crazy before, just try and ignore these jurors and do nothing about it! Especially with what you are doing with the Sandra Birchmore case. O boy!!
Just when you thought it was over... this defense team is incredibly tenacious! I'm a pretty smart cookie but listening to Bev's instructions to the jury regarding the verdict forms made my head spin. That form was confusing ON PURPOSE. Even the minor correction made in light of the defense's objections did not fix that. Bev wanted KR convicted of SOMETHING, that was clear. I can't even use the word "judge" in conjunction with Bev's name, doesn't seem right. It stinks to high heaven that she hand picked the foreperson, who then sent a very important note to the judge without running it past the rest of the jury. Not a good look. We need to change KR's name to Patsy because that's what she is to all the cops, the judge and even JO's family. At this point it's irrelevant whether she actually committed the crimes she's charged with... the evidence presented in no way even proves JO was struck by a vehicle, and the lead prosecutor grossly misconducted the whole investigation.
Totally agree with you, also the instructions were insane right!!! I mean, I will send in the instructions with you but what I say here makes precedence and you can’t take notes???
The judge must go. She’s biased.
INNOCENT!!!
Of being human.
Put that corrupt judge in jail in the general population!!!
The judge was informed on the confusing tally form and requested to make clear. This is totally on the judge. And in fact that there is proof of not guilty is an attack on all our constitutional rights. We all want justice but we can take an innocent person to make things right.
BINGO!!!!! Your comment should have THOUSANDS of likes. The Verdict Form had only a Guilty Box for the 2 Lesser Charges, and a Guilty and Not Guilty on the Murder 2 Charge.
For all three charges, there should have been 3 boxes:
Box 1 --- Not Guilty
Box 2 --- Guilty
Box 3 --- We Cannot Reach a Unanimous Decision On This Charge
She was so biased during the trial. How did she not say there was a unanimous verdict on two counts. It’s crazy
I was surprised when she told the jury "I won't do that to you, I will declare Hung Jury". I had thought she was going to send them back again to deliberate. May be she thought that they would come back with 'not guilty' on all or they might fill the form and declare 'not guilty' for 2 counts . She has taken an oath to be impartial and not favor either side.
@@shailaja6788 yes exactly this. She wanted a guilty verdict so bad.
Bev out of control. Can’t wait to see what, if anything, she does about this. She messed this up big time! Should of explained to the jurors!
Bev was doing everything in her power not to do the right thing. She needed to call each charge and ask what did the jury decide. Unanimous 2 out of 3 on Not Guilty Judge should have let us all know. Judge Beverly is just too corrupt as well.
Hahaha did you hear Brian just say which, if anything? 😂😂
Judge Cannone, the literal world is watching.
The judges brother represent Colin’s Dad in a fatal hit and run-she was asked to recuse-she refused and bade the defense pay for their request! Her sighing, eye rolling and rudeness is conduct unbecoming of a judge!
Ya I thought that was a real thing lol
Defense is screwed by judge
🤣 She NEVER said I hit him! Jen McCabe even got caught lying on the stand! 😂
Jen McLiar is guilty of first degree murder imo. She planned and organized JO to be dumped in the snow, googled how long to die and her 911 call omitting officer down to prevent emergency services arriving too quickly and her words distancing herself from ‘her friend whom she loved’. She organized his death
Yeah, funny how they remembered that at this trial but didn’t remember when testifying to the grand jury, it seemed like they didn’t remember who they handed phones to, or who did what but they were emphatic about her saying that in this trial, remember it like it was yesterday, but grand jury, oh look over there!
There were 4 separate people duh. She said it in court says later. I suppose the court and camera made that up to? Yanetti lol.
@@stevenprice6957 who, Jen McCabe said it in court? Yeah she did, she got caught lying! None of those four people mention it before the court case, none! They didn’t mention it at the time, or when they were interviewed, when they testified at the grand jury, not one of them mentioned her ever saying that but conveniently, they remembered for court. What a bunch of lally liars!
@@stevenprice6957 who, Jen McCabe said it in court? Yeah she did, she got caught lying! None of those four people mention it before the court case, none! They didn’t mention it at the time, or when they were interviewed, when they testified at the grand jury, not one of them mentioned her ever saying that but conveniently, they remembered for court. What a bunch of lally liars!
The judge is definitely BIAS!
BIASED WICKED JUDGE.
Corruption
Cover up . Karen is not guilty!!
Cover up. Alec Baldwin is not guilty!!
@@holdontight1981apples don’t make oranges. But what is happening with that trial, I haven’t followed?
Free karen read
Is it not considered inappropriate when the judge is all like “is there something funny, Ms. Read?” That ish rubbed me the wrong way.
Jurors,
Please come out and confirm this! This is a human being’s life. If this was YOU, wouldn’t you pray the jurors who believed you were not guilty would come out and say that? ❤
Unbelievable!!!! I hope the rest of the jurors come forward and expose the corrupt judge!!!
Bev should of made sure the jurors understood. Especially after confusing the 💩 out of them with that paper work. She incompetent at the very least!
Karen Read had an excellent defense attorney !!!
Judicial misconduct.
Aunty Bevs Circus
Judicial misconduct
1 juror saying that does not make it true.
So bring them all back, ask them!
Did the judge even look at the actual verdict slip before she declared a mistrial? It looked like she only read a personal note that was handed to her that said the jury remained deadlocked and then she immediately declared a mistrial, but this note may not have spelled out that they were deadlocked on one charge and unanimous on the other two.
All speculation & hearsay at this point, Defense best have rock solid evidence for an upcoming hearing.
Don't recall The State mentioning they were attempting to retry on counts one & three.
Those verdict forms are VERY confusing, I'm sure... Which is why that JUDGE should have inquired more on the difficulties the jury was having. 🙄 Instead of just, " I'm sending you back, okay " .. TWICE she did that.
Third time she didn't send them back, worried that they might come back with "Not Guilty" for the third charge also.
@shailaja6788 probably! Just wrong for her not to recuse herself in the beginning! 😠
Stevie Wonder can see this is a frame job! He was beaten to a pulp and bitten by a dog! No injuries on his lower body! FRAMED!
Julius Caesar can see this was a frame job to protect the real culprits!
Paul couldn't explain how JOK held on to the glass cup in his hand and kept saying "I wasn't there". He thinks Accident Reconstruction Experts would have been present and witnessed the accidents. Prosecution made fool of themselves by bringing a guy who had taken only two online courses about accident reconstruction and no other experience.
@@shailaja6788 not even math experience it would seem!
This is one juror providing this information. When the judge read the jury foreman's letter it clearly states that they were divided on "charges" (plural) more than once.
The Juror is saying they were divided on "charge(s). They were not guilty on two of the 3, and hung on 1. That is the very definition of division.
I can certainly understand the confusion though.
Don’t forget the one they were hung on had lesser charges. Ie multiple.
Massachusetts especially canton is a joke
Remove cameras from courtroom and sequester jury
Have to try but it's not going to happen.
Hoping more jurors will come forward!!
Justice for OJO and FREE Karen Read! The corruption and bias is ridiculous!
Everyone is danger i.e., the jury, the attorneys, and the defendant
why did the defence team not speak up? and why didn't the jury check off the boxes?
Judge Bev didn’t give them a chance she released the jury and called mistrial all in one breathe. Very sneaky Not enough boxes for not guilty
@@kathleenwalker4415 It was their job to speak up. She wasn't going to ask them. I believe Karen is 100% innocent, but the Defense dropped the ball on this, imo. Looking forward to how things unfold on the 22nd.
@@jeninga1976-v3scan't drop a ball on something they were not aware of at the time. The judge rushed mistral on purpose.
both sides should have asked.!
@@kathleenwalker4415 they still could have asked. both sides.
She should not expect any help from anyone. Rage!!!!!!
4 jurors stated they aquit Karen on count 1 and 3, no double jeopardy here please
TAKE THAT CORRUPT JUDGE OUT OF THIS EQUATION!
Judge purposely confusing jury form caused this.
Judge lied about original form was standard Massachusetts form
She sure did and infront of the literal world.
Always funny when you get away with the crime.
Not sure the McAlberts have gotten away with it yet, however, given the “investigation” you may be right, they may just get away with it but unlikely they’ll get away from other charges I suspect. Who knows, will be interesting to see what the feds come out with. They already gave both sides exculpatory evidence and prosecution didn’t seem keen to use that but it worked out well for the defense to have two highly qualified experts testify beyond reasonable doubt that a car did not hit John and a car did not cause those injuries!! I doubt they will even try and retry, got no lead investigator anymore.
No crime was proven! They couldn’t even prove a car hit John, let alone how a car bit John’s arm! It was proven however that a car categorically did not hit John and it most certainly did not bite him or do you just not believe in physics or gravity?
There were three charges against her. At the end of the trial, why didn’t the judge ask the foreman to give the jury’s verdict on each charge like it’s done in other trials. The verdict is read out on each charge. She didn’t even do this. She declared a mistrial without knowing (or maybe she did know) what the jury’s verdict was for each charge. The three jurors probably saw that. I can understand why they would approach defence and tell them the true verdict. They probably saw the manipulation of the court.
May be hand picking the Foreman was for this purpose and not to be clear on the Form. The wordings weren't like usual jury's note to the judges. He/she used sophisticated words to write note to the judge and didn't know to fill out the form properly. Seems it was intentionally omitted , or may be was instructed to do so.
This is the judges fault. Its her responsibility to ensure this very big oversight did not happen. There was a verdict in this case. Judge declaring a mistrial was false information and not relaying the verdict to the court. She claimed to be very familiar with and had many times before seen these ‘lesser incudeds’?) So did she do this on purpose?
UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She´s acquitted and the DA is making re-trial !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She is 💯% free of two charges....
The judge was sooo not neutral
the prosecution used so many dirty tactics that anything other than an innocent verdict would be a travesty of justice. Unrelated experts, not employed by the defence or by the prosecution testified that it was impossible the victim was struck by ANY vehicle. The prosecution at one point used an inverted video to misrepresent a testimony to the jury. It was disgusting. I've never seen a trial like this. Sadly the truth will probably never be known in this case, but I don't believe she hit him with her car, simply because of the testimony of the Accident reconstruction experts, in conjunction with the medical experts. One of the medical experts was the states own witness. All of their testimony aligned and none of them saw any injuries or damage to the car consistent with a motor vehicle vs pedestrian accident. End of story. If you cant get past this basic requirement of it even being possible he was hit by a car, then the rest is impossible. I cant believe the jury even hung on this. Additionally the Alberts sitting in the courtroom staring down the jury on the last day...that was just plain weird.
If the Vehicle's mirror image trick at Sally port was done by Defense, they would have definitely been sanctioned . Prosecution is allowed to lie and cheat .
The guest is scared of 'somebody' to say as he sees it. "I am not going to say she made a mistake" .He indirectly says "the Judge might want to do it differently going forward". That means, the guest is saying, she didn't do it the proper way. When a person's life is involved no room for mistake and taking another attempt to doing it right? What a Non-sense.
The judge was so clearly on the states side.
It’s very clear that she’s innocent. This is ridiculous.
Fatal atraction 😡
Read this!
I love you❤❤❤❤❤😊
Channel 5 is extremely bias. Brian Albert’s lawyer also happens to be channel 5s legal analyst!
NO
YES
Good job judge go get your buz on now
No you can't change your mind after the fact. OJ Simpson's jury stated right after that he probably did it.
They didn’t change their minds straight after! What are you talking about.
Let’s say this as simple as a hit and run. That’s it? Would there be interest in this case ?
Would people look e follow it or even report on it? Probably not. It would have a small report on it and it would be over. Add conspiracy theories and a pile of people including cops and you have a jackpot of drama and suspense that will be followed a lot more. You add UA-camrs who push the conspiracies to the full and start blaming anyone and everyone and add a cover up and wham bam you have a money maker.
Fact is ,, This is a simple hit and run. Karen caused the death of John Okeefe. The rest is money and fraud.
All that drama, suspense and basic physics…
@@gerttopmullerit’s very basic. Karen caused the death of John Okeefe. Only a dummy or a fan would disagree. The data lines up dead on. Her actions are damning. Her tailight is busted at 5;07 as there is a gaping hole on camera. Zoom in. Clear as day. Blames ploughs at 5:01 lol. Ok Karen. Admits it. In court says it’s an accident. She didn’t hit him yet hard. She’s a psychopath
Awful early in the day for you to be drunk.
I fail to believe that all of these cops and troopers are all involved in a cover up. There are too many of them and watching them testify assumptions have been made and everyone has jumped to conclusions that they are all corrupt but can you really believe that all of them have gotten together to get “their stories straight”!! I think KR did it too however got lucky that these cops and troopers made mistakes that looked bad on them and because of this she has literally “gotten away with murder”!!
@@kylie9730spot on.
Not going to dismiss . A second trial is coming soon guaranteed!
😂😂😂😂😂 they won’t retry, they are a complete joke, oh wait, and corrupt AF! That house of cards is coming down, they’ve lost their lead “investigator” in the case and it’s a dead flop at this point. They should try and save some face and dismiss the two charges and use that to say we’re satisfied that a jury has found Ms Read not guilty for those two counts and by virtue would render the 2nd count not guilty too.
The judge is corrupt
nothing burger
Not guilty is hardly a nothing burger. This would have come to light of Auntie Bev would have polled the jury. She didn’t. She’s a biased as they come.
@@karinaz8756 and now it's too late.... sooooooo.... nothing burger
@@user-nz5iz9ce8o they’re literally filing motion to dismiss right now. There is no disputing that’s she was found not guilty. So it makes CW just look that much more incompetent engaging in a retrial just to get the same verdict. This revelation dictates what can be admitted in the next trial. Takes half of the prosecution’s witnesses and evidence off the table. That’s FAR from a nothing burger.
@@karinaz8756 I do agree with you that auntie Bev is trash though.
@@user-nz5iz9ce8o it’s not too late. So much for that retrial. There is nothing to try if she has been found not guilty of the biggest charge. It’s a wrap .
That expensive defense team blew it.
🤡
😂😂😂😂 how do you figure?
Really living up to the “dumb blonde” stereotype, huh Brooke?
Brent Crude Oil crash soon
It is time to stop torturing OJ Simpson. He was innocent!
lf Karen's innocent,why can't she smile,giggle or smirk!!!Helloo it's her right,ppl r jealous of her(maybe allegedly)she's an outsider?!!But 2call the folks(The Pink Ppl)by interviiewer of:Paul O is:BIAS*Again condolences 2John O'keefe senior n family♡
It's absurd. It doesn't work like that. Nice try though, Karen.
Did you just butt-post this?
There is actual case law that says it can and has worked like that.
Which mills and boon book did you get your case law from?
Karen read needs to be put to jail still for killing the victim with her car bwahaha
With those phone calls, how is she not required to be admitted into a mental hospital?
ALL THE ANGRY TXT THIS WOMAN SENT... SHE DEFINETLY KILLED HIM. WHAT SURPRISES ME THE MOST THO IS ALL THE FEMALE SUPPORT... USUALLY THEY NEVER SUPPORT A WOMAN ON TRIAL (MAYHAP THE JUST DONT LIKE INNOCENT ONES OR IT A SIGN OF THE TIMES?)
Oh stop it! It was proven a car didn’t hit him. Clearly you’re a science denier, how’s that gravity working out for you? The math don’t lie and the math says not guilty!