UA-cam has demonetized this video for allegedly depicting "violence", without giving me a timestamp of where the problem is and no further explanation. If you disagree with UA-cam's decision and would like to support the work I do here with these kinds of in-depth videos, please consider signing up for a Nebula subscription here: go.nebula.tv/reallifelore Thank you
It kinda seems like they have it out for you. I don't knownof any other channels that get demonitized as frequently. Almost like they are trying to squash competition.
Thank Trump for entrapping America to choosing either military isolationism or diplomatic disrepute. This is but a taste of what a “multipolar” world will be like should the US disengage further.
It's just Republican talking points. Each situation is different. We wouldn't abandon SK like we did Afghanistan. The difference is South Koreans would actually be willing to fight for their country, and not just give up. Afghanistan was always a lost cause. If a people won't stand up for themselves, they don't deserve us to stand up for them.
@@jimmym3352 nobody in Afgh wanted you there. You were always 100% foreign occupiers. Why did you for a second imagine that any Afghans would "stand up" and be "willing to fight" for a foreign occupier?
Thanks for not thinking beyond the tip of your nose. What an enslave mind, ask your teacher who lied to you because the book said so, infact she has already learnt what she taught was wrong.
@@tempejkl There's always a begining for anything, like Saudi Arabia got themselves stuck with a flood and even a snow storm at some points a few years ago, same can be said with Israel.....
Don't confuse the BRICS with the CRINKs. Many of us in the BRICS dislike dictatorships as well. Russia and China only pretend to be part of the undeveloped world in order to gather sympathy. But India and Brazil, who actually represent the undeveloped world, are democracies.
Yeah, he sent troops to fight for Russia against Ukraine to test their readiness, not to fight for Putin. Didn't want to be caught off-guard like Putin was, unprepared & ignorant of the Army's shortfalls. They'll come back with all the reconnaissance & and training results that can fit in a body bag.
My theory is Putin told North Korea to act like they are going to invade, to pull attention and military units away from Europe and more towards the Korean/Chinese area.
And their acting included blowing up all the infrastructure that would be needed for starting a war? It's obvious North Korea is just sending more than it is comfortable with to Russia and deciding to beef up the border in case the south takes the chance to invade while North Korea is weakened.
He probably thinks the rest of the world is too busy dealing with Ukraine, Syria and Israel but I think he's underestimating South Korea, they'd be no pushovers
And also underestimating the US's capacity to respond to crises in multiple theatres. The Navy and Airforce, along with forward deployed ground assets, would be very quick to respond. Unlike the ruzzians who larp at being a superpower, the US is a truly global superpower, some would argue hyperpower.
Every assessment I have seen says that South Korea would crush the North's obsolete military with or without the aid of America. Aside from China wanting North Korea as a buffer zone, the main thing that has kept America and South Korea back hasn't been concerns about whether or not we could defeat the North, it's that nobody wants to deal with a refugee crisis caused by the North's regime toppling and nobody wants to do the work to fix that country.
@michael9433 please clarify why US is superpower and even hyperpower? Id it because how it ran away from Afganistan? For me as non american, America looks to be in existential crisis (internal).
@@michael9433 They are such a powerful super power that they didn't win any direct war after ww2. In truth the US can't attack nk as astounding as it sounds. If they could attack nk then they would have done it after the collapse of the Soviet Union and instill a puppet dictator. As of now nk has relations with Russia, china etc who would fund and support nk just like how the EU or the United States do with Ukraine, only this time they have a compatible military whether we accept or reject the notion that the US has better military technology. Ukraine was a failure as it didn't destabilize Russia , with sk your only viable supporters would be Japan and the United States (who doesn't want to completely stop its relations with china) . Including the EU would overstretch its economical aid (and that is if its aid even reaches sk. The us can make multiple fronts due to its geopolitical position and relations, after that it is economically outperformed by china and it's outperformed by Russia in military (again, chugging cash into the drain doesn't automatically mean you would have an equally good result). And that's all without considering the fact that nk has nukes.. Pre Ukraine you could make the case of whatever you had said but as of now the US is at a political turmoil and simply saying "we will spend billions and equipment in Ukraine, Israel and sk!! 😃" would cause even more economical instability with broken relations. The only way for the US to at least have the possibility to do whatever you had said it would need to stop the Ukrainian conflict by making amends with Russia and accepting its terms(which are the most straight forward and realistic terms in the negotiation) . Then it would need to put its shit together for a time and swiftly end the Israeli-pakistan conflict as its a money and equipment drain. So you would literally need to pull a "what if everything went good for the US" to do whatever you had said
Quick thing about the subs, diesel submarines main issue is not being loud - they don't* run diesel engines underwater, only above water or just below water with a snorkel. They rely on electric batteries to move when properly submerged. So the issue is most of the time they operate on the water, not under it - making their position visible. They only dive for relatively short periods of time when needed (attacking, escaping) - most of the time they're above water. Their range isn't that short either, but yes not unlimited like a nuclear sub. So really, the issue is that a nuclear-armed nuclear sub relies on being anywhere at any time, and a diesel sub will have to be surfaced for a significant amount of time, eliminating that advantage. *And yes, diesel subs can extend their submerged time with air independent propulsion, but that also relies on oxidizer that is consumable, and that is consumed very quickly. It's not meant for continuous use.
And while running on batteries, they tend to be even more silent than nuclear subs. Less moving parts. At least that was the case a while back, maybe state of the art nuclear subs overcame that (which wouldn't apply o North Korea either way). That made me stop watching. If he's wrong about something not that technical or unknown, what else in the video is wrong?
Having seen ROK troops in maneuvers, and having a pretty solid idea what the KPA looks like ... the North can *hurt* South Korea, but is utterly incapable of successfully invading. There are three usable invasion routes into the South: one along the east coast, one along the west coast, and one down MSR 3 into the Uijeongbu Bowl. The first two routes are a waste of time and would only be useful as diversionary axes of attack. The third is *the* viable invasion route, as Seoul has no defensible terrain worth a damn once you enter the Bowl. ROK officers are not stupid, they are more than aware of this and have planned accordingly. Every bridge is wired for demolition, every hill has been fortified, and a hell of a lot more. Technologically, the North is totally outclassed. ROK troops have modern body armor and night-vision optics along with some of the most advanced and capable armor and artillery assets on earth (Samsung and Hyundai make a hell of a lot more than cell phones and automobiles) while Northern troops are still using Soviet-era equipment that is often deeply out of date. The South also has more (and more advanced) artillery, in addition to force multipliers like counter-battery radar (which they are quite competent at using). Not to mention the US forces on the peninsula, bringing with them the best infantry on the planet and the best intelligence picture of any country in the world. Once a handful of very specific units (including the KPA heavy bridging units) move past pre-plotted lines, the 8th Army starts calling for backup and the US Military starts sending in more forces (in addition to the seriously capable ROK forces already present). An invasion by the North will destroy a lot of towns and kill a lot of people, but their military forces are hopelessly outmatched. If the North breaks the Nuclear taboo, B-2 bombers and Trident SSBNs are likely to make an appearance as well (not to mention the almost certain deployment of US special operations personnel, who will rack up unbelievable kill counts against unarmored and situationally-blind NK troops).
I've lived in South Korea and my ex-wife comes from there, so it feels a bit like my second home. Still, I'm currently not too worried about a possible invasion. There's good reason to be vigilant but we shouldn't blow the danger out of proportion. For starters, it's not at all clear whether China will truly invade Taiwan. At the present time, they are heavily disincentivized from doing so because they profit from the western economic order. Economic stability is everything to the Chinese leadership because it's the only thing that keeps China's huge population from revolting and demanding more democratic structures. Furthermore, Kim Jong Un isn't a madman in my opinion. He may wield his nukes as a means to scare his enemies but I can't imagine him going through with an actual nuclear attack over a populated area. Besides, he's not the only one in possession of nuclear warheads and he knows that. What's the point of incinerating Seoul if the US retaliates and incinerates Pyongyang? Another factor that has been left out of this video are America's numerous allies, particularly in Europe. Many Americans assume that European countries would stay neutral because they refused to join America's war in Iraq. However, Iraq and Afghanistan can't be compared with a WWIII. For one, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and America's invasion was completely unprovoked. The situation in Afghanistan was a little more complicated but at the end of the day, that too, was an unprovoked invasion. As a European myself, I get why many European leaders felt it was crazy to sacrifice their own male population to forcefully democratize Afghanistan or steal Iraq's oil. I'm sure the political calculus would look different if Taiwan or South Korea were invaded because both of them are European allies and both of these invasions would be unprovoked (i.e. Taiwan and South Korea would be the victim). Depending on how the Russian-Ukrainian war continues to develop, some leaders may also feel that all of these conflicts are interconnected and refusing to support Taiwan/South Korea would come back to bite Europe in the ass. For this reason, I think countries like the UK and France (perhaps even Germany, Poland, Italy and Spain) would get much more invested in these conflicts than they are currently. It's worth mentioning that taken together, France and the UK alone outspend Russia in terms of military budgets. Out of the 10 countries with the highest military budgets, 8 are the US or American allies. The only exceptions are China and Russia; North Korea doesn't even make the list. China and Russia, North Korea and Iran have a combined military budget of approx. USD $425 billion. Meanwhile, India, Saudi Arabia, the UK, France, Germany, Ukraine, and Japan (all top 10) have a combined military budget of approx. USD $575 billion. South Korea adds another $45 billion to this, while Taiwan adds another $16 billion. In other words, North Korea and its allies are already outspent massively. And this doesn't even include the US, which approved a defense budget of $841 billion for 2024. And while China is a global superpower, I'd still venture to say that at least at the present time, America and Europe have an edge when it comes to military technology. I'm pretty sure Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping know this and they will think very carefully whether a military adventure is truly worth it for their country. I'm still convinced Putin made a big miscalculation by attacking Ukraine. Even if he wins the war, which isn't at all certain, it will be a pyhrric victory. I mean... 150,000 dead soldiers after 3 years of fighting, that's ridiculous. That's nearly 4 times the US casualties during the Vietnam War.
The US invasion of Afghanistan was completely justified. They hosted Al Qaeda and refused American demands to quell them. According to this logic the Israeli invasion of Lebanon today is unprovoked, because it was in response to the militia actually ruling the country rather than the shell of the Lebanese state. Much can be said about American mistakes in Afghanistan, but the binary question of whether the initial invasion was justified is an unequivocal yes.
You'd think that theyd keep the roads around so that tanks would cross faster, to me theyre just closing the border and focus on solidifying the separation between north and south
@@jimsopinion9867 When they need to cover significant distances. Or be transported to locations. Both of which happen all the time in warfare. Just look at the plight of Russian tanks in Ukraine - most of them have been destroyed while attempting to use the road network.
Showing them wartime Russia and Ukraine isn't much to look at. And they'll get actual combat experience with (allegedly) the second most powerful military on earth.
@@ZergleJerk Even war-torn Ukraine is going to be a real eye-opener to the North Koreans. The level of material wealth in Ukraine, while not impressive by Western standards, will be to North Koreans. I'm sure North Korean commanders have instructed the Russians to keep them in the battlefield as much as possible to avoid contact.
@@magtafcmdr8621 what material wealth. have you seen the Ukrainian landscape over there? everything is rubble. they are not visiting Kiev or Lvov or Odessa. They are "visiting" villages razed to the ground
Berlin, Present Day. Nighttime. The camera pans down to a gravestone with the date 1889-1945 barely visible. The ground moves before a skeletal hand bursts out. V.O.: "His story isn't over yet" To Be Continued in Season Three.
I disagree. I think North Korea has accepted that they could never absorb South Korea. The separation has been so long that South Korea economically and ideologically could never be controlled and would actually pollute the Kim dynasties cult of personality it currently has over the North.
Kim hasn't accepted squat. Never will. Dictator types always believe that they can never lose, i.e. Hitler, Trump. They're in it until their last breath.
Trust me they know alone they can not succeed but If China goes after Taiwan and places the US, Japan and South Korea in sending support there North Korea will indeed attack. They have been building their military for over 70 years and are desperate.
Hey man! It sucks that UA-cam demonetized your video, I can only imagine that these videos take hours of research and writing and production. I can't subscribe to Nebula right now, but I wanted to show some appreciation for your amazing work. Keep it up!
It’s crazy how close NK’s current military equipment they parade looks like WW2 era German and Soviet equipment. Essentially they’re just a slightly updated/upgraded version of the same weapons
I don't think you can debunk speculation, but I'd say it's not very likely. The time frame is part of it. Assuming that you aren't saying Russia is just going to give North Korea the fully manufactured weapons systems and that it's just a tech transfer, I don't see NK being able to meet even the 2030 timeline wrt being able to manufacture even Russian levels of tech with their current tech base. Then there is the use of nuclear weapons, which would be a hard red line that I don't see even the Russians shielding NK from the consequences, let alone China, even if China is engaged in a Taiwan adventure. Basically, it's the reason Russia hasn't used a nuke in Ukraine...it's a red line that every country would honor if crossed. Use of them would basically be declaring total war not just on the South but on the entire Western alliance...even the Europeans wouldn't sit by, thumb up ass for that. The US would literally go ballistic, and so would Japan. Finally, unless NK is willing to use their nukes extensively on the South...which kind of renders moot an invasion...the South would kick the NKs ass conventionally. I'll just point out one more point...all of these regimes, with the possible exception of China, are on the verge of collapse at this stage. And frankly, China ain't lookin' so good either, economically. Pretty obviously, this 'alliance' between NK and Russia is a desperate move by both parties, and it will only go as far as each party thinks it directly benefits them...and here I'm talking about Kim and Vlad. Neither is going to really stick their neck out for the other when the chips are down. And the China factor is that China is not that happy with either right now for escalating the conflict in Ukraine by introducing NK troops. Just my off the cuff thoughts FWIW....I think this is improbable, but I suppose it could happen.
@@haroldotrotter9148 Half of my family lives in Russia and Russia is not about to collapse lol. Thats just either wishful thinking or straight up propaganda.
Bro you drunk if you think any of these regimes are on the "brink" of collapse. NK was having a really bad time during a famine but these countries are doing pretty much fine for the most part.
This is world war 3 we're talking about, there will be no "innocent people" anymore, discrimination will be pushed to a white hot stage, riots will breakout to push foreigners out, the US just spent billions into anti-chinese media campaigns, UA-cam is one of those platforms and UA-camrs are paid by agency in the shadow with generic names
So i'm guessing Kim-Jong Un wants to leave some kinda legacy behind so he sees a war as the only option. Classic. "Since we have all this military equipment, why wouldn't we use it?" Let diplomacy win, please, for once.
Let’s hope Harris wins then. A competent diplomatic corps would at least stabilize the situation, as opposed to Trump’s abortive embarrassment that’s already burned that bridge.
@doujinflip I mean if we let Harris go talk to Kim about the significance of passage of time for a few hours he might fall asleep and forget all abouat attacking SK. 🙄
@@doujinflip Trump got them to negotiate and made a historical meeting between the two leaders. It was during Biden's administration that Putin invaded Ukraine, and that the DPRK changed their constitution to have a strike first policy.
I'm a south korean male who's 21. And man am I cursing our country's mandatory military service policy, especially nowadays. Edit: because 20 is around the age most males eligable are called in for service. Or choose to enlist before being called in. To get it out of the way.
Maybe you will be cursing less in the short to medium term mentioned in the video? It woild be great if all like you could be doing something more useful for the humanity, but what are the options with such neighbours like NK and Russia? Better have the basic training now than being given a gun with no training in the future.
You don't destroy roads if you plan to invade soon. If you will invade you want to use the roads. You don't sell off your weapons if you plan to invade. This is a longer term plan.
Lord God almighty, let cooler heads prevail and prevent future wars. Grant us the wisdom to end our current wars and grant us the power to remove the corruption from our governments. Amen.
God ain’t gon do anything for you brother, if you want change take it upon yourself. That’s how it’s always worked, god doesn’t change the world, people do
One note: Isn't it true that the DPRK fell back on its nuclear energy when normalization talks with the US and the ROK, and only began making nuclear weaponry in proper when these peace talks fully broke down after top US officials under Bush started talking about turning the DPRK into a charcoal crater? I feel like you got the cause and effect switched but could be wrong. I like that you noted that Un is rational, we have to be careful of thinking world leaders are completely irrational, it can often be a tactic to come off as such for various reasons, like Nixon's so called "Madman strategy" or whatever it was called where he tried to do that, something currently also applicable to Israeli leadership. Many of these people arent insane so to speak but acting under an often unempathetic hyperrationality. I'm glad you noted this potential for an explosion of conflict isn't necessary. Sorry, but I don't have a hopeful analysis to give you though. The US could cool this down after like a 1 minute phone call just like they could end the gen* in Gaza, but they won't. Kamala follows the democratic neocolonial bloodlust line, and Trump follows the the "the Israel lobby and the MIC pays me and I gotta look out for me" which means he stumbles into even more bloodthirsty policies. It's truly lesser evil voting when it comes to foreign policy which I believe has the potential to ruin or end the lives of millions right now, on top of the atrocities already committed. I think the only way to stop these atrocities that the US could fix or not cause with ease we would either need a complete democrat party leftward overhaul or a third party (not any of the current main parties) to come in and take its place. I fear we'll have to hope the next generation of politicians is more progressive, but even if that does happen, how many will die as a result of the old vanguard holding on in that time period
Of course he does. He's a propagandist. There isn't a fucking country on planet Earth that has had the deals they've signed with America be upheld by America.
When talking submarines, diesel submarines are generally far quieter than the alternatives. Due to all the water intake needed to cool nuclear reactors, nuclear submarines have by far the largest emission profile of the two. The naval part is just wrong on so many levels. Also, if NK subs were easy to detect, you wouldn't see so many incursions in SK TTW. The trade-off with Deisel to Nuclear is theoretical endurance. Without the need to refill, a nuclear submarine could technically stay underwater for a great deal longer, depending on logistical stores. Which is completely irrelevant when operating in the coastal and litoral waters that any naval engagement would take place in.
Generally, though newer naval nuclear propulsion minimizes the amount of noisemaking pumps, instead having natural convection create the movement of coolant. But yeah there isn’t much need for months of stores for long deployments underwater. Although NK’s smaller boats will eventually face pressure with its limited stowage and resupply lines getting choked off over time.
Well you are right and wrong at the same time... Yes, modern, top of the line diesel-electric submarines are more quiet than nuclear ones. On the other hand: the 1950-1960s era submarines (Romeo and November class boats, even Kilo class) are definitely noisy compared to anything the western power have nowadays. And I agree, NK doesnt need high endurance boats to put up significant challange to western navies near the Korean coast. The electric motors are still fairly quiet until while the batteries last.
NK would have to have "discovered" something that made them either extremely desperate and willing to risk a devastating defeat, or extremely confident that they would be quickly and fully victorious. I'm not seeing anything that would indicate either has happened.
I have a friend who was originally from South Vietnam who used to claim that if the US had air dropped rice into North Vietnam instead of bombs, that war would have turned out differently. I think a similar plan to win the hearts of the North Korean people would bear fruit in this instance!
It's my understanding the problem with Diesel submarines is that they have very limited submerged time as they don't use engines under water but rather batteries and that's why they are less stealthy.
Honestly, if North Korea thinks it can fight and win, we should be expecting them to do exactly that. The real crime is the Obama and Trump administrations failed to find a diplomatic solution and normalize relations. But in the current situation, US/South Korea must improve both avenues: make war look worse for North Korea, and make diplomacy look better.
@@thebugle1355 According to who? No legitimate question. Government sponsored South Korean Television Broadcasts? Every time I hear about it, it just so happens that the person that fled, got out well over two decades ago. ANY sources from the last, say, 3 years?
i don't really think that they have even a slight chance if they 1v1 south korea .it doesn't matter how fast they are preparing south k is just waay more rich. well armed and modernized in comparison . they would have to call again big daddy china and i don't think the teddy would agree
As a Korean who moved back to Korea, Im pretty scared and I don't think South Korea is taking things too seriously... Im not so scared about losing the war but just the innocent lives that are going to be lost from war alone scares me. I live relatively close to the border and I don't want my family to suffer. I have a dog who is basically going to become a 'baggage' if we have to defend ourselves but I don't know if Im able to do that. Id rather die protecting my dog but I also dont want to put my family members in danger.. If we get nuked, we're all practically doomed. War is just not the way.
I have been watching you since you made those comparison vidoes in 2016-2017, and i have always loved your content. Espacially your newer ones that kind of started after the Russo-Ukraine war. I think you are by far the best source for worldwide information, and i am glad to see your channel expanding continously. I go onto youtube daily just to see if you have upploaded.
Mistakes: LOX-Kerosene is Liquid Oxygen and Kerosene, not "Low Oxygen Kerosene." Diesel electric subs can be noisy when running their diesel engines, but they can also be quieter than nuclear subs while running on batteries. It's true that North Korean subs have limited range. In any case, the old N. Korean subs had vastly inferior sonar.
This kind of all ignores the fact that South korea can develop their own nuclear weapons very quickly. South Korean analysts have estimated around 6 months to have missiles ready to fire, considering they only need the warhead, and have the enrichment capability. It is a pretty popular idea as well in the south, even without the eminent threat of escalation. North korean nuclear weapons can really only be a defensive tool as long as the regime is not suicidal, since it would desolve its shield that was blocking the arrows of conventional weapons, and invite heavier retaliation.
China would never let the US or any major US ally just waltz into Pyongyang without a fight. North Korea is there literally just because China wanted a buffer state between them and the US supported Korea and Japan, and China still values that if nothing else.
North Korea does not claim South Korean territory as it's own anymore Kim said as much that they are not interested anymore in militarily taking over South Korea and prefers a two state hostile system.
Annie Jacobsen wrote a whole book about this potential nuclear catastrophe. I think there's some exaggeration in the book, but the ability for this to rapidly spin out of control is frightening.
Imagine if the North Koreans went through the test run without defecting, so Putin says "Okay they did well, bring in more!" Then when they send hundreds of thousands of North Korean soldiers, they all defect and run into the European Union to escape North Korea lol
North Korea taking Yeongpyeongdo will be basically impossible.The S Korean defense is too prepared for this scenario of N Korea succeeding in an amphibious assault on Yeongpyeongdo. There are marines, helicopters, and artillery already deployed to the island and the S Korean navy is not going to leave their front door open despite constant N Korean skirmishes. Naval and air supremacy are absolutely required for amphibious assaults and North Korea's navy and air force are in tatters while the South Korean counterparts are among the best. There is nothing Russia can do to fundamentally change this, and Russia and China are never going to greenlight Kim using nukes for an island.
Well... we can't really blame North Korea for not giving up their nukes for American assurances. Ukraine did it in 1994 and now look where that got them.
You can even compare it to other dictatorships with rocky relations with the US, Iraq under Saddam and Libya under Gaddafi had nuclear programs they got rid of and they both got overthrown and killed, both instances involving the US. To expect Kim to get rid of his countries Nukes for improved U.S. relations is very unrealistic.
Notes on the video: 1- If a war breaks out in the Korean Peninsula, an invasion of Taiwan will follow; if China invades Taiwan, the two Koreas will go to war. 2 - Japan will be indispensable in either scenario to the American side; Japan will not miss a chance to force the U.S. to break its militarisation ban. Japan will welcome the involvement. 3- All in all, this isn't simply a matter of tension between any two states; rather, it is a political theatre of five nations (Japan, China, the Koreas and Taiwan) sharing history and water and who are all in high suspense.
@@D__Cain Not the brightest are you? Are you still mad that actual propaganda was hit by the DOJ earlier or something? Otherwise I would *love* to hear how someone deep diving esoteric government agencies is propaganda. Please. Enlighten me what you don't like about Wendover
I know that woman (Maria Angelina Alexander) If you were born and raised in new York you'd know too, she's my family's Broker for 3yrs till now and a very good one if you asked me. No doubt she is the one that helped you get where you are!!!!
UA-cam has demonetized this video for allegedly depicting "violence", without giving me a timestamp of where the problem is and no further explanation. If you disagree with UA-cam's decision and would like to support the work I do here with these kinds of in-depth videos, please consider signing up for a Nebula subscription here: go.nebula.tv/reallifelore
Thank you
Truly infinite in its wisdom
UA-cam is cancer. But there's no real alternative yet.
Awful sorry about that, great video
It kinda seems like they have it out for you. I don't knownof any other channels that get demonitized as frequently. Almost like they are trying to squash competition.
I noticed they don't want ppl talking about the war because ppl should know that things are ramping up
I don't know about any of you, but I'm getting pretty tired of these evil people waging war for their own benefit while the rest of us suffer
Then vote for peaceful ladies instead of these violent billionaire buddies
History of humanity tbh
@@RaphaelAlejandrothought humanity developed
Just another Tuesday if you look at the past, still sad...
Which ones are evil? The ones that benefits the most are the companies making the weapons.
If you ever feel useless, remember, North Korea has ellections.
Unfortunately, elections in North Korea are not useless for the regime.
So does Russia.
Now that’s just riddiccullous!
Not useless, a count for loyal citizens
@@realdreamerschangetheworld7470 Yeah, same as calling the country the "People's Republic" when its the definition of an absolute monarchy.
As the years have gone by, I've more and more understood the old Chinese curse, "May you live in interesting times."
interesting saying
That's not a Chinese phrase, it's fake lol
@@LancesArmorStriking lol and confidence in which people say it attempting to sound smart and sophisticated while being utter tools
I know it as a curse from Terry Pratchett's book.
2020s be like:
Interpreting North Korea's and Russia's belligerence in the light of the retreat from Afghanistan is very interesting actually. Good point of view!
Thank Trump for entrapping America to choosing either military isolationism or diplomatic disrepute. This is but a taste of what a “multipolar” world will be like should the US disengage further.
It's just Republican talking points. Each situation is different. We wouldn't abandon SK like we did Afghanistan. The difference is South Koreans would actually be willing to fight for their country, and not just give up. Afghanistan was always a lost cause. If a people won't stand up for themselves, they don't deserve us to stand up for them.
@@jimmym3352 Ukranians are willing to fight, and have been....
@@jimmym3352 nobody in Afgh wanted you there. You were always 100% foreign occupiers. Why did you for a second imagine that any Afghans would "stand up" and be "willing to fight" for a foreign occupier?
Slava SAMSUNG 🤳 Heroyam Hyundai 🦾
have to wonder how North Korean soldiers will fair during the winter months considering most have almost zero body fat
dont worry, im sure the russians can provide enough borscht and vodka...
dont worry china will help with it
Yeah, because North Korea has never had winter before…
Thanks for not thinking beyond the tip of your nose. What an enslave mind, ask your teacher who lied to you because the book said so, infact she has already learnt what she taught was wrong.
@@tempejkl There's always a begining for anything, like Saudi Arabia got themselves stuck with a flood and even a snow storm at some points a few years ago, same can be said with Israel.....
Technically they are still at war
Not anymore. War formally ended in 2018. After Trump and Kim met in Singapore.
@@bac0n_b1tz Wow I thought it was still ongoing
@@bac0n_b1tz In Nov 2023 NK terminated that agreement
Don't confuse the BRICS with the CRINKs. Many of us in the BRICS dislike dictatorships as well. Russia and China only pretend to be part of the undeveloped world in order to gather sympathy. But India and Brazil, who actually represent the undeveloped world, are democracies.
@@bac0n_b1tz Oh, unfortunately, we're still at war.
What you remember is the ongoing negotiations to end the war, which ultimately failed.
DMZ the goat at being the most heavily militarized piece of land to exist.
not a good thing.
@haroldotrotter9148 ah yes, I called it a good thing.
Forgive me
They also love to talk shit about celebrities
It is also one of the most dangerous places to be if you are on the DMZ.
@@Emtrax.???
Team “nothing ever happens” where you at?
Kim aint gonna do shit
What are North Koreas malnourished soldiers gonna do 😂
Nothing ever happens.... Until it does
@fisherman08123 NEVER underestimate your enemy
Yeah, he sent troops to fight for Russia against Ukraine to test their readiness, not to fight for Putin. Didn't want to be caught off-guard like Putin was, unprepared & ignorant of the Army's shortfalls.
They'll come back with all the reconnaissance & and training results that can fit in a body bag.
My theory is Putin told North Korea to act like they are going to invade, to pull attention and military units away from Europe and more towards the Korean/Chinese area.
And their acting included blowing up all the infrastructure that would be needed for starting a war?
It's obvious North Korea is just sending more than it is comfortable with to Russia and deciding to beef up the border in case the south takes the chance to invade while North Korea is weakened.
Putin isn’t going to invade Europe. He can’t and won’t. Not in his interest excluding Ukraine.
Sounds about right. Actually reigniting the war makes zero strategic sense for NK.
Invade what ?! The south ? They don’t have anything 😂
@@hockeynumber28 'act like they are going to invade'. Stage, distract. Western powers put resources on the DMZ, taking away from Ukraine.
IMHO. It will kick off at the same time the PRC makes the play for Taiwan.
I have the same thought!
That's what I've been saying for months. I expect it to happen in 2025. Harris will have her hands full here soon.
@@jimmym3352 Or maybe trump
@@Decatron-ox7seHopefully not
@@jerrywil7012 Get ready for 4 years of Trump fool :)
He probably thinks the rest of the world is too busy dealing with Ukraine, Syria and Israel but I think he's underestimating South Korea, they'd be no pushovers
And also underestimating the US's capacity to respond to crises in multiple theatres. The Navy and Airforce, along with forward deployed ground assets, would be very quick to respond. Unlike the ruzzians who larp at being a superpower, the US is a truly global superpower, some would argue hyperpower.
Every assessment I have seen says that South Korea would crush the North's obsolete military with or without the aid of America. Aside from China wanting North Korea as a buffer zone, the main thing that has kept America and South Korea back hasn't been concerns about whether or not we could defeat the North, it's that nobody wants to deal with a refugee crisis caused by the North's regime toppling and nobody wants to do the work to fix that country.
@michael9433 please clarify why US is superpower and even hyperpower? Id it because how it ran away from Afganistan?
For me as non american, America looks to be in existential crisis (internal).
North Korea does have a gun to Seoul’s head though…
@@michael9433 They are such a powerful super power that they didn't win any direct war after ww2. In truth the US can't attack nk as astounding as it sounds. If they could attack nk then they would have done it after the collapse of the Soviet Union and instill a puppet dictator. As of now nk has relations with Russia, china etc who would fund and support nk just like how the EU or the United States do with Ukraine, only this time they have a compatible military whether we accept or reject the notion that the US has better military technology. Ukraine was a failure as it didn't destabilize Russia , with sk your only viable supporters would be Japan and the United States (who doesn't want to completely stop its relations with china) . Including the EU would overstretch its economical aid (and that is if its aid even reaches sk. The us can make multiple fronts due to its geopolitical position and relations, after that it is economically outperformed by china and it's outperformed by Russia in military (again, chugging cash into the drain doesn't automatically mean you would have an equally good result). And that's all without considering the fact that nk has nukes.. Pre Ukraine you could make the case of whatever you had said but as of now the US is at a political turmoil and simply saying "we will spend billions and equipment in Ukraine, Israel and sk!! 😃" would cause even more economical instability with broken relations. The only way for the US to at least have the possibility to do whatever you had said it would need to stop the Ukrainian conflict by making amends with Russia and accepting its terms(which are the most straight forward and realistic terms in the negotiation) . Then it would need to put its shit together for a time and swiftly end the Israeli-pakistan conflict as its a money and equipment drain. So you would literally need to pull a "what if everything went good for the US" to do whatever you had said
Quick thing about the subs, diesel submarines main issue is not being loud - they don't* run diesel engines underwater, only above water or just below water with a snorkel. They rely on electric batteries to move when properly submerged. So the issue is most of the time they operate on the water, not under it - making their position visible. They only dive for relatively short periods of time when needed (attacking, escaping) - most of the time they're above water. Their range isn't that short either, but yes not unlimited like a nuclear sub.
So really, the issue is that a nuclear-armed nuclear sub relies on being anywhere at any time, and a diesel sub will have to be surfaced for a significant amount of time, eliminating that advantage.
*And yes, diesel subs can extend their submerged time with air independent propulsion, but that also relies on oxidizer that is consumable, and that is consumed very quickly. It's not meant for continuous use.
And while running on batteries, they tend to be even more silent than nuclear subs. Less moving parts. At least that was the case a while back, maybe state of the art nuclear subs overcame that (which wouldn't apply o North Korea either way).
That made me stop watching. If he's wrong about something not that technical or unknown, what else in the video is wrong?
Having seen ROK troops in maneuvers, and having a pretty solid idea what the KPA looks like ... the North can *hurt* South Korea, but is utterly incapable of successfully invading.
There are three usable invasion routes into the South: one along the east coast, one along the west coast, and one down MSR 3 into the Uijeongbu Bowl. The first two routes are a waste of time and would only be useful as diversionary axes of attack. The third is *the* viable invasion route, as Seoul has no defensible terrain worth a damn once you enter the Bowl.
ROK officers are not stupid, they are more than aware of this and have planned accordingly. Every bridge is wired for demolition, every hill has been fortified, and a hell of a lot more.
Technologically, the North is totally outclassed. ROK troops have modern body armor and night-vision optics along with some of the most advanced and capable armor and artillery assets on earth (Samsung and Hyundai make a hell of a lot more than cell phones and automobiles) while Northern troops are still using Soviet-era equipment that is often deeply out of date. The South also has more (and more advanced) artillery, in addition to force multipliers like counter-battery radar (which they are quite competent at using).
Not to mention the US forces on the peninsula, bringing with them the best infantry on the planet and the best intelligence picture of any country in the world. Once a handful of very specific units (including the KPA heavy bridging units) move past pre-plotted lines, the 8th Army starts calling for backup and the US Military starts sending in more forces (in addition to the seriously capable ROK forces already present).
An invasion by the North will destroy a lot of towns and kill a lot of people, but their military forces are hopelessly outmatched. If the North breaks the Nuclear taboo, B-2 bombers and Trident SSBNs are likely to make an appearance as well (not to mention the almost certain deployment of US special operations personnel, who will rack up unbelievable kill counts against unarmored and situationally-blind NK troops).
Finally an intelligent military assessment.
I've lived in South Korea and my ex-wife comes from there, so it feels a bit like my second home. Still, I'm currently not too worried about a possible invasion. There's good reason to be vigilant but we shouldn't blow the danger out of proportion. For starters, it's not at all clear whether China will truly invade Taiwan. At the present time, they are heavily disincentivized from doing so because they profit from the western economic order. Economic stability is everything to the Chinese leadership because it's the only thing that keeps China's huge population from revolting and demanding more democratic structures. Furthermore, Kim Jong Un isn't a madman in my opinion. He may wield his nukes as a means to scare his enemies but I can't imagine him going through with an actual nuclear attack over a populated area. Besides, he's not the only one in possession of nuclear warheads and he knows that. What's the point of incinerating Seoul if the US retaliates and incinerates Pyongyang? Another factor that has been left out of this video are America's numerous allies, particularly in Europe. Many Americans assume that European countries would stay neutral because they refused to join America's war in Iraq. However, Iraq and Afghanistan can't be compared with a WWIII. For one, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and America's invasion was completely unprovoked. The situation in Afghanistan was a little more complicated but at the end of the day, that too, was an unprovoked invasion. As a European myself, I get why many European leaders felt it was crazy to sacrifice their own male population to forcefully democratize Afghanistan or steal Iraq's oil. I'm sure the political calculus would look different if Taiwan or South Korea were invaded because both of them are European allies and both of these invasions would be unprovoked (i.e. Taiwan and South Korea would be the victim). Depending on how the Russian-Ukrainian war continues to develop, some leaders may also feel that all of these conflicts are interconnected and refusing to support Taiwan/South Korea would come back to bite Europe in the ass. For this reason, I think countries like the UK and France (perhaps even Germany, Poland, Italy and Spain) would get much more invested in these conflicts than they are currently. It's worth mentioning that taken together, France and the UK alone outspend Russia in terms of military budgets. Out of the 10 countries with the highest military budgets, 8 are the US or American allies. The only exceptions are China and Russia; North Korea doesn't even make the list. China and Russia, North Korea and Iran have a combined military budget of approx. USD $425 billion. Meanwhile, India, Saudi Arabia, the UK, France, Germany, Ukraine, and Japan (all top 10) have a combined military budget of approx. USD $575 billion. South Korea adds another $45 billion to this, while Taiwan adds another $16 billion. In other words, North Korea and its allies are already outspent massively. And this doesn't even include the US, which approved a defense budget of $841 billion for 2024. And while China is a global superpower, I'd still venture to say that at least at the present time, America and Europe have an edge when it comes to military technology. I'm pretty sure Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping know this and they will think very carefully whether a military adventure is truly worth it for their country. I'm still convinced Putin made a big miscalculation by attacking Ukraine. Even if he wins the war, which isn't at all certain, it will be a pyhrric victory. I mean... 150,000 dead soldiers after 3 years of fighting, that's ridiculous. That's nearly 4 times the US casualties during the Vietnam War.
Punctuation and paragraphs, my brother. You have to learn to use them.
@@ararune3734FTGP😂
Your analysis is stuck in 2019.
The US invasion of Afghanistan was completely justified. They hosted Al Qaeda and refused American demands to quell them. According to this logic the Israeli invasion of Lebanon today is unprovoked, because it was in response to the militia actually ruling the country rather than the shell of the Lebanese state.
Much can be said about American mistakes in Afghanistan, but the binary question of whether the initial invasion was justified is an unequivocal yes.
@@blueandgreenslacks Too scared or uneducated to use words?
Easier to hide behind cartoon faces?
Maybe because you're 14...?
Deterrence hasn't failed. Countries have lacked the backbone to take action to deter hostility.
You'd think that theyd keep the roads around so that tanks would cross faster, to me theyre just closing the border and focus on solidifying the separation between north and south
It's their first time. They're still figuring out the basics.
North Korea no longer wants reunification
They don't need a land route to send over the missiles they've been testing
When did tanks become dependent on roads?
@@jimsopinion9867 When they need to cover significant distances. Or be transported to locations. Both of which happen all the time in warfare. Just look at the plight of Russian tanks in Ukraine - most of them have been destroyed while attempting to use the road network.
Surprised to see the hermit kingdom allowing thousands of young men to see the outside world with their own eyes
Showing them wartime Russia and Ukraine isn't much to look at. And they'll get actual combat experience with (allegedly) the second most powerful military on earth.
@@ZergleJerk Even war-torn Ukraine is going to be a real eye-opener to the North Koreans. The level of material wealth in Ukraine, while not impressive by Western standards, will be to North Koreans. I'm sure North Korean commanders have instructed the Russians to keep them in the battlefield as much as possible to avoid contact.
@@magtafcmdr8621 what material wealth. have you seen the Ukrainian landscape over there? everything is rubble. they are not visiting Kiev or Lvov or Odessa. They are "visiting" villages razed to the ground
@@JWentu i think he means stuff like modern technology in the rubble
None of them are coming home
It's like when a season is ending and there's a post-credits stinger teasing the return of a villain from long ago.
Berlin, Present Day.
Nighttime. The camera pans down to a gravestone with the date 1889-1945 barely visible. The ground moves before a skeletal hand bursts out.
V.O.: "His story isn't over yet"
To Be Continued in Season Three.
North Korea as a villain in a show only reminds me of team rocket
Holy shit and the name fits 💀
I disagree. I think North Korea has accepted that they could never absorb South Korea. The separation has been so long that South Korea economically and ideologically could never be controlled and would actually pollute the Kim dynasties cult of personality it currently has over the North.
Who said it was about control? There is also possibility of annihilation.
@@brenatevionly reason SK doesn’t have nukes is because America promised to place their nukes there and use them if NK uses theirs against them
@brenatevi You think killing everyone in the south was North Korea’s goal. All of it’s industry, banking, and infrastructure?
Kim hasn't accepted squat. Never will. Dictator types always believe that they can never lose, i.e. Hitler, Trump. They're in it until their last breath.
Trust me they know alone they can not succeed but If China goes after Taiwan and places the US, Japan and South Korea in sending support there North Korea will indeed attack. They have been building their military for over 70 years and are desperate.
We need to send Matt Damon.
Matttttttttt Daaaamoooooonnnn
MATT DAMON!!
Kim Jong-Un is just a disaster... Total disaster for that peninsula including his father and grandfather
Almost as bad as Drumpf
@@chaoticdanoridk I wouldn’t go that far Kim is more respectable
Least brainwashed democrat@@tonyawan1964
@@tonyawan1964 dude...
He is just exaggerated version of every other American President
Thanks for focusing on this issue!🙏🏻
Yea this guy usually hits the spot on geopolitics.
Make SOJU Great Again 🍶Kim Jong Un 😎
@@silence4114 for brainwashed westerners, he does
@@TricaGamerConspiracy theorist😂
@@TricaGamer "Any reports i don't like is a western propaganda" ahh comment 😭🙏
I'm a rocket man
Rocket man
Burning out his fuse up here alone
Slava SOJU 🍶 Kim Jong Un 😎
15:14
LOX is not low oxygen, It's liquid oxygen.
Hey man! It sucks that UA-cam demonetized your video, I can only imagine that these videos take hours of research and writing and production. I can't subscribe to Nebula right now, but I wanted to show some appreciation for your amazing work. Keep it up!
It’s crazy how close NK’s current military equipment they parade looks like WW2 era German and Soviet equipment. Essentially they’re just a slightly updated/upgraded version of the same weapons
Thank you Natasha Romanenko and Metal Gear for teaching me what a MERV was as a child.
MIRV*
MIRV. Multiple Indpendent Re-entry Vehicle. And yeah, Natasha was cool.
@@eWeaver144 No wonder I couldn't google it o7
I thought I remembered hearing about this tech before.
Who's Ya DIDDY ❔❓
I don't think you can debunk speculation, but I'd say it's not very likely. The time frame is part of it. Assuming that you aren't saying Russia is just going to give North Korea the fully manufactured weapons systems and that it's just a tech transfer, I don't see NK being able to meet even the 2030 timeline wrt being able to manufacture even Russian levels of tech with their current tech base. Then there is the use of nuclear weapons, which would be a hard red line that I don't see even the Russians shielding NK from the consequences, let alone China, even if China is engaged in a Taiwan adventure. Basically, it's the reason Russia hasn't used a nuke in Ukraine...it's a red line that every country would honor if crossed. Use of them would basically be declaring total war not just on the South but on the entire Western alliance...even the Europeans wouldn't sit by, thumb up ass for that. The US would literally go ballistic, and so would Japan. Finally, unless NK is willing to use their nukes extensively on the South...which kind of renders moot an invasion...the South would kick the NKs ass conventionally. I'll just point out one more point...all of these regimes, with the possible exception of China, are on the verge of collapse at this stage. And frankly, China ain't lookin' so good either, economically. Pretty obviously, this 'alliance' between NK and Russia is a desperate move by both parties, and it will only go as far as each party thinks it directly benefits them...and here I'm talking about Kim and Vlad. Neither is going to really stick their neck out for the other when the chips are down. And the China factor is that China is not that happy with either right now for escalating the conflict in Ukraine by introducing NK troops. Just my off the cuff thoughts FWIW....I think this is improbable, but I suppose it could happen.
I really dont think Russia is on the verge of collapse at all (its military may tho). However your opinion is very sensible i will agree.
@@haroldotrotter9148 Half of my family lives in Russia and Russia is not about to collapse lol. Thats just either wishful thinking or straight up propaganda.
Bro you drunk if you think any of these regimes are on the "brink" of collapse. NK was having a really bad time during a famine but these countries are doing pretty much fine for the most part.
South Korea is much more prepared to defend & fight, than in the '50's - Good luck NK.
Russia can’t even invade Ukraine and North Korea are extremely poor and weak😂
@@wygeeeUkraine is being backed by like 30 countries
@@MrBosszillaGaming 3 countries not 30. russia are backed by NK these 2 claim to be the strongest when realistically theyre not
@@wygeee ok so nato is just 3 countries?
almost all of nato is sending money and supplies to Ukraine
The entire video was me going “I’m sorry he did what now?“
Kim Jong Un 😎 Make SOJU Great Again 🍶
@ Amen
I pray for all the innocent people in these areas.
This is world war 3 we're talking about, there will be no "innocent people" anymore, discrimination will be pushed to a white hot stage, riots will breakout to push foreigners out, the US just spent billions into anti-chinese media campaigns, UA-cam is one of those platforms and UA-camrs are paid by agency in the shadow with generic names
So i'm guessing Kim-Jong Un wants to leave some kinda legacy behind so he sees a war as the only option. Classic. "Since we have all this military equipment, why wouldn't we use it?"
Let diplomacy win, please, for once.
Let’s hope Harris wins then. A competent diplomatic corps would at least stabilize the situation, as opposed to Trump’s abortive embarrassment that’s already burned that bridge.
@@doujinflipthe bide Harris administration is what brought all this on how you can't see that is beyond me
@doujinflip I mean if we let Harris go talk to Kim about the significance of passage of time for a few hours he might fall asleep and forget all abouat attacking SK. 🙄
@@doujinflip Trump got them to negotiate and made a historical meeting between the two leaders. It was during Biden's administration that Putin invaded Ukraine, and that the DPRK changed their constitution to have a strike first policy.
@bokiNYC you’re thinking about Biden he’ll be out by then
lost track of how long your chain of hypotheticals is. odds of anything coming true after the first couple of scenarios is effectively 0
Thanks for leaving the sponsor to the end, informative watch
I'm a south korean male who's 21. And man am I cursing our country's mandatory military service policy, especially nowadays.
Edit: because 20 is around the age most males eligable are called in for service. Or choose to enlist before being called in. To get it out of the way.
Maybe you will be cursing less in the short to medium term mentioned in the video?
It woild be great if all like you could be doing something more useful for the humanity, but what are the options with such neighbours like NK and Russia? Better have the basic training now than being given a gun with no training in the future.
This video is sponsored by BETTER HELP
Me: breaks keyboard
Hear me out. We start a Whiskey brand called Help Better.
It's not.
Who's Ya DIDDY ❔❓
Hey I just wanted to mention that equatorial guinea has 2 capitals one is Malabar and the second is ciudad de la Paz
Top comment. 🏆
You don't destroy roads if you plan to invade soon. If you will invade you want to use the roads.
You don't sell off your weapons if you plan to invade.
This is a longer term plan.
Good points…. 🤔Unless that’s what they want us to think!! ☝️🧐 dun dun dun
This video is important. I subscribed to Nebula, but I implore you to continue posting to UA-cam because the more eyes on your content the better! Plz
Lord God almighty, let cooler heads prevail and prevent future wars. Grant us the wisdom to end our current wars and grant us the power to remove the corruption from our governments. Amen.
God ain’t gon do anything for you brother, if you want change take it upon yourself. That’s how it’s always worked, god doesn’t change the world, people do
Slava SAMSUNG 🦾
You're not praying hard enough
@@michaelhussey8603 God gives people the strength to make the change. He does not intervene with people's free will
Who's still watching this in 2019?
Gleeb trob niorb zorb gleeb gleeb 👽
@@waspify1853photos printed? 👨
Zib zib zib zub zub zub zub
The video was only published in 2024.
Bro I'm still watching 2013
One note: Isn't it true that the DPRK fell back on its nuclear energy when normalization talks with the US and the ROK, and only began making nuclear weaponry in proper when these peace talks fully broke down after top US officials under Bush started talking about turning the DPRK into a charcoal crater? I feel like you got the cause and effect switched but could be wrong. I like that you noted that Un is rational, we have to be careful of thinking world leaders are completely irrational, it can often be a tactic to come off as such for various reasons, like Nixon's so called "Madman strategy" or whatever it was called where he tried to do that, something currently also applicable to Israeli leadership. Many of these people arent insane so to speak but acting under an often unempathetic hyperrationality. I'm glad you noted this potential for an explosion of conflict isn't necessary. Sorry, but I don't have a hopeful analysis to give you though. The US could cool this down after like a 1 minute phone call just like they could end the gen* in Gaza, but they won't. Kamala follows the democratic neocolonial bloodlust line, and Trump follows the the "the Israel lobby and the MIC pays me and I gotta look out for me" which means he stumbles into even more bloodthirsty policies. It's truly lesser evil voting when it comes to foreign policy which I believe has the potential to ruin or end the lives of millions right now, on top of the atrocities already committed. I think the only way to stop these atrocities that the US could fix or not cause with ease we would either need a complete democrat party leftward overhaul or a third party (not any of the current main parties) to come in and take its place. I fear we'll have to hope the next generation of politicians is more progressive, but even if that does happen, how many will die as a result of the old vanguard holding on in that time period
Of course he does. He's a propagandist. There isn't a fucking country on planet Earth that has had the deals they've signed with America be upheld by America.
put it as a normal comment so everyone can see it because its very intersting and it would be a shame that less people see it
15:15 I think you mean Liquid Oxygen- Kerosene rockets
Came here to say this, thanks
loooooooooool
LOX / LOW, what's the difference? 🤣
When you display weakness and/or incompetence, the desperate, the weak and the stupid are encouraged.
Thanks for the information
When talking submarines, diesel submarines are generally far quieter than the alternatives. Due to all the water intake needed to cool nuclear reactors, nuclear submarines have by far the largest emission profile of the two. The naval part is just wrong on so many levels. Also, if NK subs were easy to detect, you wouldn't see so many incursions in SK TTW. The trade-off with Deisel to Nuclear is theoretical endurance. Without the need to refill, a nuclear submarine could technically stay underwater for a great deal longer, depending on logistical stores. Which is completely irrelevant when operating in the coastal and litoral waters that any naval engagement would take place in.
Generally, though newer naval nuclear propulsion minimizes the amount of noisemaking pumps, instead having natural convection create the movement of coolant.
But yeah there isn’t much need for months of stores for long deployments underwater. Although NK’s smaller boats will eventually face pressure with its limited stowage and resupply lines getting choked off over time.
Well you are right and wrong at the same time... Yes, modern, top of the line diesel-electric submarines are more quiet than nuclear ones. On the other hand: the 1950-1960s era submarines (Romeo and November class boats, even Kilo class) are definitely noisy compared to anything the western power have nowadays.
And I agree, NK doesnt need high endurance boats to put up significant challange to western navies near the Korean coast. The electric motors are still fairly quiet until while the batteries last.
As a hoi4 player it's sad that they haven't changed to war eco yet 22:35
Well....that's anxiety inducing
Don’t worry, the election is coming soon and your choice is between Russia Neville Chamberlain or Asia Neville Chamberlain.
Take your pick.
If the Punjabi wins the American election, I will tell you, we're ALL cooked
@@storminmormin14 what election? here it is 2 years for the next, everyone isnt american on the internet
@@alexstromberg7696 Then there’s no need for you to comment. And also your elections and opinions don’t matter on the world stage.
@ neither does yours, the American election is a shitshow to the rest of the world
Red herring. If North Korea was serious about war with the South, they would not have sent stockpiles of ammo and soldiers to Ukraine.
NK would have to have "discovered" something that made them either extremely desperate and willing to risk a devastating defeat, or extremely confident that they would be quickly and fully victorious. I'm not seeing anything that would indicate either has happened.
They’re still at war (technically)
Can you link your sources as well pls🙏🙏
Call of Duty - Advanced Warfare
Ho4
there's no link to common sense
They never have sources.
@zeul1337 there should be for stats shared however
Northern chihuahua barks wildly at Southern tank.
northern worm
Jalisco Cartel: Por favor Gringo hold our TEQUILAs 🥃
Kim Jong Un : Comrade Putin, hold ma SOJU 🍶 Comrade Xi, hold ma Ramyeon 🍜
I have a friend who was originally from South Vietnam who used to claim that if the US had air dropped rice into North Vietnam instead of bombs, that war would have turned out differently. I think a similar plan to win the hearts of the North Korean people would bear fruit in this instance!
It's my understanding the problem with Diesel submarines is that they have very limited submerged time as they don't use engines under water but rather batteries and that's why they are less stealthy.
Honestly, if North Korea thinks it can fight and win, we should be expecting them to do exactly that. The real crime is the Obama and Trump administrations failed to find a diplomatic solution and normalize relations. But in the current situation, US/South Korea must improve both avenues: make war look worse for North Korea, and make diplomacy look better.
finally someone who sounds like they got some sense, its more refreshing to see then it should be.
Trump literally had them at the table together in 2018 and they both signed. Sadly NK and Fat Kimmy ripped it up in 2023.
Kim Jong Un 😎 Make SOJU Great Again 🍶
Diplomacy and peace? Gun lobbies hate this trick. Without them we probably already would have world peace.
Doomsday clock closer and closer to midnight...
preparing for war while your neighbor is draining you from munition seems something north korea would do.
My years of playing Fallout has prepared me for this scenario.
Cannibal build?😁
RealLifeLore and wendover production uploading on same day🙏
These clowns can't feed their population.
Yeah, they can’t even feed their soldiers, the soldiers have to find food.
@@thebugle1355 According to who?
No legitimate question. Government sponsored South Korean Television Broadcasts? Every time I hear about it, it just so happens that the person that fled, got out well over two decades ago. ANY sources from the last, say, 3 years?
@@radicalindividual7774 Google is free Mr. Conspiracy theorist, Not all reported is from western media either.
@9:52 I don't think Pyongyang is pronounced like "pee on yang"
Oh it is- and Yang is China 😂
Poor Yang. 😢
😭
i don't really think that they have even a slight chance if they 1v1 south korea .it doesn't matter how fast they are preparing south k is just waay more rich. well armed and modernized in comparison . they would have to call again big daddy china and i don't think the teddy would agree
As a Korean who moved back to Korea, Im pretty scared and I don't think South Korea is taking things too seriously... Im not so scared about losing the war but just the innocent lives that are going to be lost from war alone scares me. I live relatively close to the border and I don't want my family to suffer. I have a dog who is basically going to become a 'baggage' if we have to defend ourselves but I don't know if Im able to do that. Id rather die protecting my dog but I also dont want to put my family members in danger.. If we get nuked, we're all practically doomed. War is just not the way.
I have been watching you since you made those comparison vidoes in 2016-2017, and i have always loved your content. Espacially your newer ones that kind of started after the Russo-Ukraine war. I think you are by far the best source for worldwide information, and i am glad to see your channel expanding continously. I go onto youtube daily just to see if you have upploaded.
What if we ask them to knock it off
Everyone asks why is Kim but no one asks how is Kim?
Greettings from Finland!
Hello pekka
Matrixcraft. Greetings from USA. Visited your country when I was hosting cultural exchange youth. Really enjoyed myself in your beautiful country.
Glad I had notifications on.
Kim wouldn't wanna risk his own life by invading and potentially losing the war
Mistakes: LOX-Kerosene is Liquid Oxygen and Kerosene, not "Low Oxygen Kerosene." Diesel electric subs can be noisy when running their diesel engines, but they can also be quieter than nuclear subs while running on batteries. It's true that North Korean subs have limited range. In any case, the old N. Korean subs had vastly inferior sonar.
This kind of all ignores the fact that South korea can develop their own nuclear weapons very quickly.
South Korean analysts have estimated around 6 months to have missiles ready to fire, considering they only need the warhead, and have the enrichment capability.
It is a pretty popular idea as well in the south, even without the eminent threat of escalation.
North korean nuclear weapons can really only be a defensive tool as long as the regime is not suicidal, since it would desolve its shield that was blocking the arrows of conventional weapons, and invite heavier retaliation.
No wonder N. Korea is so poor - they keep wearing out their pavement with all that useless synchronized stomping.
Yeah thats why, 70 years of sanctions have nothing to do with it.
@@insanekos1They've self reliance policy. But yeah, 70 years of sanctions is so bad, It make Kim's dynasty gained weight.
Let's see them try. Allied forces will be in Pyongyang by the end of it.
China will have something to say about that
China would never let the US or any major US ally just waltz into Pyongyang without a fight. North Korea is there literally just because China wanted a buffer state between them and the US supported Korea and Japan, and China still values that if nothing else.
Whatever happens tens of millions WILL perish
Because it went so well last time, and the people are so eager to enter into another foreign engagement right?
@@CoreyKearney This time China would do nothing, South Korea would win without major US involvement, and China isn't ready to fight the US.
North Korea does not claim South Korean territory as it's own anymore Kim said as much that they are not interested anymore in militarily taking over South Korea and prefers a two state hostile system.
Annie Jacobsen wrote a whole book about this potential nuclear catastrophe. I think there's some exaggeration in the book, but the ability for this to rapidly spin out of control is frightening.
Imagine if the North Koreans went through the test run without defecting, so Putin says "Okay they did well, bring in more!"
Then when they send hundreds of thousands of North Korean soldiers, they all defect and run into the European Union to escape North Korea lol
China, DPRK, and Russia together in an axis, what could go wrong😂
this is nothing more than a result of the us foreign policy
Add Iran to that list!
If you researched the history after the second European tribal war, these 3 have been an axis since 1945.
@@foundones China and Russia can't even get lost together.
You should make a video on the logistics of polling
Dig a hole, line it with concrete, add water--
Oh, POLLING
These videos are great. UA-cam should be thanking you.
Love these vids. Keep it up. I know UA-cam is annoying but these videos are so valued
Happy Halloween Everybody 🎃✨👻
It's very difficult if not impossible for Korea to be united when you have a dictator in the other country
Also I believe you meant “buy slaves from North Korea”…
I wish Nebula were as smooth as UA-cam in its UI
North Korea taking Yeongpyeongdo will be basically impossible.The S Korean defense is too prepared for this scenario of N Korea succeeding in an amphibious assault on Yeongpyeongdo. There are marines, helicopters, and artillery already deployed to the island and the S Korean navy is not going to leave their front door open despite constant N Korean skirmishes. Naval and air supremacy are absolutely required for amphibious assaults and North Korea's navy and air force are in tatters while the South Korean counterparts are among the best. There is nothing Russia can do to fundamentally change this, and Russia and China are never going to greenlight Kim using nukes for an island.
Technically they're already at war
Phony war
So are Japan and Russia since 1945
@@foundones ...The two countries ended their formal state of war with the Soviet-Japanese Joint Declaration of 1956....
0:51 What's up with bro's hair
Hes rocking that croissant hairdo!
He might sent you a nuke .
RIP
7:30
Look at the corpse (mouth open) on the right...
Malnutritional Army you mean.
Still getting ads on a demonetized video is criminal
Learning so much about sumbarines.
Or are they sumberrines? Not sure.
Well... we can't really blame North Korea for not giving up their nukes for American assurances. Ukraine did it in 1994 and now look where that got them.
You can even compare it to other dictatorships with rocky relations with the US, Iraq under Saddam and Libya under Gaddafi had nuclear programs they got rid of and they both got overthrown and killed, both instances involving the US. To expect Kim to get rid of his countries Nukes for improved U.S. relations is very unrealistic.
I know, right? Ukraine FAFO'd on lying American deals.
Should have kept their deals with Russia, and ignored America.
"can never challenge the US AND South Korea in a one on one fight".
One on one eh?
Never Say NEVER 😎 Justin Bieber
20 seconds ago is crazy
Great Video🎉
Notes on the video:
1- If a war breaks out in the Korean Peninsula, an invasion of Taiwan will follow; if China invades Taiwan, the two Koreas will go to war.
2 - Japan will be indispensable in either scenario to the American side; Japan will not miss a chance to force the U.S. to break its militarisation ban. Japan will welcome the involvement.
3- All in all, this isn't simply a matter of tension between any two states; rather, it is a political theatre of five nations (Japan, China, the Koreas and Taiwan) sharing history and water and who are all in high suspense.
The US isn’t why they have a militarization ban. For the past 70 years they have been trying to get them to militarize.
A RealLifeLore AND Wendover video in the SAME DAY
Almost like they colude to spread propaganda
@@D__Cain Not the brightest are you? Are you still mad that actual propaganda was hit by the DOJ earlier or something? Otherwise I would *love* to hear how someone deep diving esoteric government agencies is propaganda. Please. Enlighten me what you don't like about Wendover
@@D__Cain home what?
@@D__Cain Learn to spell, and learn to troll. That was pathetic.
@@D__Cainif your going to talk shit at least be good at it and spell correctly 😂
Yet again, the disaster of the Afghan withdrawal has long lasting implications
I wonder who they'll go for first, japan or south korea
Either way, it will be a massive mistake.
Does it matter our weapons are better than theirs anyway
How will they attack Japan? They have a few junk missiles at best that could even reach Japan.
@@geiers6013that’s the whole point of the coalition with Russia though right? To upgrade their delivery systems
@@slakk5093 Likely yes. There also are rumors of ruZZia helping them to build a nuclear powered sub.
*I'm glad you made this video,* it reminds me of my transformation from a nobody to good home, $89k biweekly and a good daughter full of love..
Please how ?
It's Maria Angelina Alexander doing she's changed my life. A BROKER- like her is what you need.
$356K monthly is something you should feel differently about....
Lovely! I enjoyed it like I enjoy a $100k monthly around the turn!!!
I know that woman (Maria Angelina Alexander)
If you were born and raised in new York you'd know too, she's my family's Broker for 3yrs till now and a very good one if you asked me. No doubt she is the one that helped you get where you are!!!!