சாக்ரடீஸ் ஸ்டூடியோ குழுவிற்கு, திரு. கச்சாமி அவர்களின் அம்பேத்கரின் நவயான பெளத்தம் புத்தகத்தின் மீது மிக எளிய மற்றும் சுவாரஸ்யமான பகிர்வின் அழகான நடையில் விளக்கியதற்கு இதயபூர்வமான நன்றியை தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறேன். உங்கள் முயற்சியும் மேலாண்மையும் எங்களுக்கு ஆழ்ந்த அறிவைப் பகிர்ந்ததோடு, புத்தகத்தின் கருத்துகளை ஆழமாகப் புரிந்துகொள்ள உதவியது. நன்றி மற்றும் நெகிழ்ச்சி, Dr. கந்தசாமி
உலக பேராசான் அண்ணல் அம்பேத்கர் ❤ மிக ஆற்றல் மிக்க சக்தி வாய்ந்த புரட்சியாளர்❤ அம்பேத்கர் சிந்தனைகள் குறித்த செய்திகளை விரிவாக எடுத்துரைத்த ஐயா பேரா. முரளி அவர்களுக்கு நெஞ்சார்ந்த நன்றிகள் ❤
This is yet another penetrating study of socio-political issues besetting our troubled society. Peraasiriyar presents an array of arguments explaining his stance.
The end of religion is the beginning of spirituality. Swami Vivekanda had said that one may be born as Hindu, but should not die as a religious person. There should be no religion. Religion divides the people but spiritulity unites people.
It is surprising that you have delved in to this topic that confuses the listener to no end. What each one has done is to exploit the spiritual Buddhism to advance their own nefarious ends, giving it various names of adaptation. Ayodhya Dasar, Periyar and Ambedkar strove to achieve the advancement of their clan in political and economic fields by cleverly twisting the facts and events of various schools of thought and they can not be dealt with on the same platform that Buddha stood and preached. The latter is an iconic philosopher who strived to save the mankind, by a different form of spirituality,while all the rest were to weave a fabric suiting their own sectarian interests. If Ayodhya Dasar preferred to seclude himself from his less fortunate brethren, how can he ever talk about equality. Same goes with EVR who questioned the wearing of jackets by paryya women ! In the final reckoning clubbing these earthly political castiest persons with Buddha In an academic discourse would spell intellectual disaster. Any lapse in time can not elevate their thoughts to any level of societal advancement as can be seen in the present day rape, loot and murder propagated by the same forces who wish to retain their hold on power by setting a false narrative.
Excellent pain staking work. But I will submit following. Buddhism has an unparreled philosophical subtle depth.I feel reducing it to social reform is 3 step down.In that case Abraham lincoln Rousseu and Montesque and many leaders of South Africa have done a lot and did end black slavery and inequality in French political setup.
What is Hinduism? +++++++++++++++++ I have long pondered on what constitutes this so called religion that sweepingly generalises the 'Indian' people and sitting on their head (as cultural hegemony) and have come up with some conclusions .... A group of priest from the Zoroastrian religion (known as Aryans same as Iran) came to northern 'India' with their Avestan language and fire rituals and later created some slogans to form the Oral Vedas (old Sanskrit) which was never in written form (modern Sanskrit in Brahmi script) until after the 5th century AD. These priest learnt the principles of the Samana tradition( the mother of Jainism and Buddhism) that originated in the Indus Valley Civilization (admixture of Sumerian agriculturist and hunter gatherers) and thrived all over the sub continent with Tamizh especially in Southern 3 Kingdoms ( tiri- three Vi-Kings Idam-place Dravidam) and started incorporating(stealing)it into their already existent vaiteegam (senseless fire ritual) and produced the Upanishad (later the 3 levels of the Bhagavad-Gita and War Epics were hijacked) and became vegetarians. For a solid philosophical footing which they needed in a highly philosophized Tamizh (Samana Palli language just as Prakrit is Jain and Pali is Buddhist) infused land (Sanatan Dharma meaning just People's Religiosity) about the 8th century scribes like Adi Sankara came up with Advaita logic that distorted the original Buddhist(Sunya-Void) thoughts and produced a dichotomical nonsense which did not last the test of time. Later they took up the Tantric Samana Tamizh tradition (where Yoga and the Martial Arts came from) about the 10th century and put forth the bakti methodology (blind surrender). This was inspired by the Christian tradition also. Bakti was based on subtle erotism and appealed to the masses(like cinemas). The high Samana Tantra philosophical (Aaseevagam) basis was ruined for the newly conjectured Saiva and Vainava cult of the wretched puranic tales (porn stories). This is the history of the Priestly class(Brahmins) that still retain their priesthood in the agamic temples (lifeless stone worship) that held sway through the bakti movement from the 12th century onwards. The consecutive non-Tamizh rulers (Brahmin admixtured race such as Vaduga Telugus) firmly rooted the new found 'Hindu' religion with its caste (karmic birth) institution (twisted from the Samana four occupational make-up of society aka Farmers, Merchants, Rulers, Philosophers) with the insidious brahmin malicious agenda of Non-Dharmic segregation (untouchability) which the colonial British gave the general name by which sealing the new found religion hence the Brahmanic hegemony as Hindooism....
தமிழ்நாட்டிற்கு தேவை சாதி பேதமற்ற நவயான புத்த ( ஆதியில் தமிழ்நாடு முழுதும் புத்தசமயமாக இருந்துள்ளது என்பதை இங்கு உணர வேண்டும் ) தமிழ்தேசியம் என்பது புரிகிறது
Liberation theology in Christianity was not developed during the time of Dr. Ambedkar. Ambedkar somehow failed to see the historic Jesus and interpreted only the divinity of Jesus Christ. Another aspect Dr. Ambedkar did not focus his attention is that of Atheism.
😮தேவையான தகவல்களை தேவையான காலகட்டத்தில் அருமையாக விளக்கிய பேராசிரியர்க்கு நன்றி.
சாக்ரடீஸ் ஸ்டூடியோ குழுவிற்கு,
திரு. கச்சாமி அவர்களின் அம்பேத்கரின் நவயான பெளத்தம் புத்தகத்தின் மீது மிக எளிய மற்றும் சுவாரஸ்யமான பகிர்வின் அழகான நடையில் விளக்கியதற்கு இதயபூர்வமான நன்றியை தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறேன்.
உங்கள் முயற்சியும் மேலாண்மையும் எங்களுக்கு ஆழ்ந்த அறிவைப் பகிர்ந்ததோடு, புத்தகத்தின் கருத்துகளை ஆழமாகப் புரிந்துகொள்ள உதவியது.
நன்றி மற்றும் நெகிழ்ச்சி,
Dr. கந்தசாமி
மிகத்தெளிவான பதிலாக இருந்தது நன்றி சார்.இதுபோல் நூல்களின் தொடர்ச்சி இருப்பின் சிறப்பே🎉.
Excellent description sir
உலக பேராசான் அண்ணல் அம்பேத்கர் ❤ மிக ஆற்றல் மிக்க சக்தி வாய்ந்த புரட்சியாளர்❤ அம்பேத்கர் சிந்தனைகள் குறித்த செய்திகளை விரிவாக எடுத்துரைத்த ஐயா பேரா. முரளி அவர்களுக்கு நெஞ்சார்ந்த நன்றிகள் ❤
திரு கச்சாமி அவர்கள் அம்பேத்கரின் பௌத்தம் அந்த நூலில் அருமையாக விளக்கி உள்ளார் சார்
சிறப்பு சார்.
Love, ethics, compassion, non-violence, austerity, living, middlepath- bhuddhism
Ethics, dialectical, justice, equality, life, revolutionary, evolution, modernity, utopian stateless society, scientific materialism-Communism. Thank you sir. Your perspective stand, effort to discuss any philosophy without taking any lean is appreciated.27-11-24.
நன்றி சார் மிகவும் எதிர்பார்க்கும் பதிவு. ❤
பட்டியல் இன மக்களை தலைவர்களாக நியமித்தவர்கள் இரண்டு பேர் தான். ஒருவர் புத்தர். இன்னொருவர் வள்ளலார்.
This is yet another penetrating study of socio-political issues besetting our troubled society. Peraasiriyar presents an array of arguments explaining his stance.
The end of religion is the beginning of spirituality.
Swami Vivekanda had said that one may be born as Hindu, but should not die as a religious person.
There should be no
religion. Religion divides the people but spiritulity unites people.
Thank you sir 🙏.
👌👌🙏🙏🙏thanks sir.😊
நன்றி அய்யா 🙏
Very good explanation sir
You are miracle speaking Book ❤🎉 thank you for your laama......
இந்திய பௌத்த மறுமலர்ச்சியின் தந்தை அறிவாசான் அயோத்திதாசர்! எதார்த்த நிலையில் நின்று பௌத்தத்தை அனுகினார்.
சிறப்பு பேராசிரியர்
வாழ்த்துக்கள்
Please interview Palam Kalyanasundaram sir..an embodiment of selflessness.
It is surprising that you have delved in to this topic that confuses the listener to no end. What each one has done is to exploit the spiritual Buddhism to advance their own nefarious ends, giving it various names of adaptation. Ayodhya Dasar, Periyar and Ambedkar strove to achieve the advancement of their clan in political and economic fields by cleverly twisting the facts and events of various schools of thought and they can not be dealt with on the same platform that Buddha stood and preached. The latter is an iconic philosopher who strived to save the mankind, by a different form of spirituality,while all the rest were to weave a fabric suiting their own sectarian interests. If Ayodhya Dasar preferred to seclude himself from his less fortunate brethren, how can he ever talk about equality. Same goes with EVR who questioned the wearing of jackets by paryya women !
In the final reckoning clubbing these earthly political castiest persons with Buddha In an academic discourse would spell intellectual disaster. Any lapse in time can not elevate their thoughts to any level of societal advancement as can be seen in the present day rape, loot and murder propagated by the same forces who wish to retain their hold on power by setting a false narrative.
வணக்கம் sir.
அயோத்திதாசரை பற்றி பேசவும்.
ஏற்கனவே பேராசிரியர் ஸ்டாலின் இராஜாங்கத்துடன் நேர்முகம் கண்டு பதிவிட்டுள்ளோம்
Thank you sir
❤
Excellent pain staking work.
But I will submit following.
Buddhism has an unparreled philosophical subtle depth.I feel reducing it to social reform is 3
step down.In that case Abraham lincoln Rousseu and Montesque and many leaders of South Africa have done a lot and did end black slavery and inequality in French political setup.
மற்ற சாதியினர் சொல்லும் கதைகளை நம்பலாமா? நம் இந்திய தேசமே கதைகளை நம்பி தான் இருக்கு
ஐயா செம டாப்பிக்
Good morning
What is Hinduism?
+++++++++++++++++
I have long pondered on what constitutes this so called religion that sweepingly generalises the 'Indian' people and sitting on their head (as cultural hegemony) and have come up with some conclusions ....
A group of priest from the Zoroastrian religion (known as Aryans same as Iran) came to northern 'India' with their Avestan language and fire rituals and later created some slogans to form the Oral Vedas (old Sanskrit) which was never in written form (modern Sanskrit in Brahmi script) until after the 5th century AD.
These priest learnt the principles of the Samana tradition( the mother of Jainism and Buddhism) that originated in the Indus Valley Civilization (admixture of Sumerian agriculturist and hunter gatherers) and thrived all over the sub continent with Tamizh especially in Southern 3 Kingdoms ( tiri- three Vi-Kings Idam-place Dravidam) and started incorporating(stealing)it into their already existent vaiteegam (senseless fire ritual) and produced the Upanishad (later the 3 levels of the Bhagavad-Gita and War Epics were hijacked) and became vegetarians.
For a solid philosophical footing which they needed in a highly philosophized Tamizh (Samana Palli language just as Prakrit is Jain and Pali is Buddhist) infused land (Sanatan Dharma meaning just People's Religiosity) about the 8th century scribes like Adi Sankara came up with Advaita logic that distorted the original Buddhist(Sunya-Void) thoughts and produced a dichotomical nonsense which did not last the test of time.
Later they took up the Tantric Samana Tamizh tradition (where Yoga and the Martial Arts came from) about the 10th century and put forth the bakti methodology (blind surrender). This was inspired by the Christian tradition also. Bakti was based on subtle erotism and appealed to the masses(like cinemas). The high Samana Tantra philosophical (Aaseevagam) basis was ruined for the newly conjectured Saiva and Vainava cult of the wretched puranic tales (porn stories).
This is the history of the Priestly class(Brahmins) that still retain their priesthood in the agamic temples (lifeless stone worship) that held sway through the bakti movement from the 12th century onwards. The consecutive non-Tamizh rulers (Brahmin admixtured race such as Vaduga Telugus) firmly rooted the new found 'Hindu' religion with its caste (karmic birth) institution (twisted from the Samana four occupational make-up of society aka Farmers, Merchants, Rulers, Philosophers) with the insidious brahmin malicious agenda of Non-Dharmic segregation (untouchability) which the colonial British gave the general name by which sealing the new found religion hence the Brahmanic hegemony as Hindooism....
How much The book sir,any book review Please share the price of the book
🙏🙏🙏
வன்முறையே இல்லாத ஜனநாயகம் இருக்கமுடியுமா? அப்படி எங்கே இருக்கு? அதுபோல் சர்வாதிகாரத்தில் சணநாயகமே இருக்காதா? அப்படி ஒரு சர்வாதிகாரம் இருக்கா?
I ya yen eppadyum sindhikkalame makkalai jadhi vaielaga pirithum yetrathazhuvu yerpaduthi kulier Kaya ninaipadumaga suyanalam kondavargalin yennangal vothumanal avargal oru kuttagavum erundu vandulladu yellorum onru yenra sindanaiyodu Bhuddar thannudaya payanathai thodarndar adarku yetru payanathil avaruku yedu makkalai nal vazhi paduthum yenra sindanaiyodu dan onru kadupokkuku Bhudda bhikkugaluku payeerchiyum pinpatruvargaluku oru payeerchiyum alithar yenra sindanai yezhugiradu yeppady tharkala kannottathil edavodhikidai azhikka thanyar maiyamakki edavodhikidai sirkulaithadu Pol varum kalapadangalilum eppadyum nadakum munnecherikai agavum erukum edai aryadavargale tharkala kannottathil kudithum kummalam vazhukkai yenru erupavargalai thirutham sayya dyanam bhakthi porvaiel avargalin yennangalai oru nilaiye bhadutha dan bhakthi sulagamum payanperugiradu nanraga erukum ganinikul wirus varuvadupol nanraga erukum yennangalai kedukum virus vozhikka prathanai antivirus thevaipadugiradu edai dan ayudhidasar kuripidugirar Bhudda bhagawanuku yeppady kuladaiva vazhipadu sayya Vanda pen kodutha payasam vudaviadum kyanam pera vudaviadum ede kuladaivangal yenbhadu dan nidarsanamana vunmai Bhudda bhagawan yenda kalakattathilum kaduvul ellai yenru kuravillai avar yedhirthadu anaithum makkalai thindamaiel erudum mudanambhikaiyal bhalyiedai avar yedhirthar kalathuku yetru makkalai nal vazhi bhakthi avasiam bhakthi yenru orunilaye manadai thuimai akkuvadu bhakthi yenru sindhikka vaikiradu
தமிழ்நாட்டிற்கு தேவை சாதி பேதமற்ற நவயான புத்த ( ஆதியில் தமிழ்நாடு முழுதும் புத்தசமயமாக இருந்துள்ளது என்பதை இங்கு உணர வேண்டும் ) தமிழ்தேசியம் என்பது புரிகிறது
Liberation theology in Christianity was not developed during the time of Dr. Ambedkar. Ambedkar somehow failed to see the historic Jesus and interpreted only the divinity of Jesus Christ. Another aspect Dr. Ambedkar did not focus his attention is that of Atheism.
Reduced to simple terms it is only ethics shrouded in releigous color and shorn of rituals and does not demand any prophets including Buddha himself.
கச்சாமி முதலில் யார்?
You want to know his caste, right?
அம்பேத்கார் தழுவிய பவுத்ததில் மகர்கள் மட்டும் தழுவியிருக்கிறார்களா மற்றவர்களும் தழுவிஇருக்கிறார்களா?
Thank you sir 🎉🎉