Real Lawyer Reacts: Parkland Judge Comments on Sarah Boone's Case - What She Says Might Surprise You
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
- #lawyeryouknow #sarahboone #suitcasemurder
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a wrongful death or personal injury case? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727)441-9030 or email us at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com.
✅ For business inquiries contact me at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com
✅ Let's connect: www.tragoslaw.com/
Twitter - @LawyerYouKnow
Instagram - @tragoslaw
Facebook - @LawyerYouKnow
TikTok - @LawyerYouKnow
✅ Join our email list here - bit.ly/33lV3Mb
✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here - bit.ly/LYKMerch
✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here - bit.ly/3OecDDD
SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER - 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2. Questions are answered on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction. 3. This content is for adults only and may contain themes that some individuals find triggering, offensive or disturbing. Viewer discretion is advised. This Video is protected under copyright laws and used under fair use. The views and opinions expressed in this video are personal and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company. Assumptions made in the analysis are not reflective of the position of any entity other than the creator(s).
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE - Розваги
I’m sure each lawyer just tells her that she’s screwed, and she won’t accept that and demands that they do something that they are not allowed to.
I couldn’t agree more. She can’t wrap her head around she’s going to get a significant amount of prison time and wants a lawyer that gets her a non custodial sentence. That’s my take on it.
Yip, I agree 100% ❤
I agree with you Peter. I don't think she's trying to delay. I think she's asking her lawyers for an unethical defense.
but is it possible that is a ploy to delay?
I think this is just how she operates. She delights in being a difficult, obtuse, contrary, malignant, manipulative brat. That is how she controls people, by keeping them spinning on their back foot, wrapped up in her chaos. She is a very sick person.
I absolutely agree that she is not trying to delay. I think she believes that she isn't guilty and thinks she's an innocent person in jail and wants to be set free. That is some of her complaints in her letters that she has been in jail so long. I honestly think she believes she will get out after a trial.
Which in itself is a delay IMO. "Do it my way or no way" like a child
Very much Agreed 👍
I think Sarah absolutely believes she will get out. She wants a trial as soon as possible, explain jury how it totally wasn't intentional and go home.
"IT... WAS NOT... INTENTIONAL"
"Well why didn't you say that before? Not guilty!!"
But she'll have to repeat it 50 times.
@@darrellcovello7917 😂
She absolutely thought she was going home after her "interview" at the station. 😂
I agree with you. I don’t think Sarah understands how bad she looks from an outside view.
I don't think Sarah is capable of considering anyone else's point of view, ever
Completely delusional!
@@akaaccountShe certainly did not understand the view of her partner dying from inside the suitcase .
IMO I think Sarah Boone wants to run the court and be in charge
She reminds me of Darell brooks so much.
As much of a circus this trial and situation has become, I cannot help but feel so bad for Jorge’s family having that video of him begging for his life played for everyone to watch.
Yes the video was awful, I hope Jorge's family get justice soon
Yes that is so terrible. Having your family member murdered, is so horrible, then having to listen to him beg for his life and this being played for everyone to hear is absolutely disgusting. I feel like there should be able to be a court order to stop this. It must be unbearable.
This case is local to me, and I have been following it from the start, and
has been thus far been a travesty of justice for the victim and his family that's been patiently waiting on a trial
In hopes of getting justice for their
Son, father, brother or other family members. I've never heard of such a thing and very disappointed our legal system has allowed this to go on for 4 years. At one point does a judge tell her that if she is not happy with the court appointed attorneys, to hire her own.? She could go through 50 court appointed attorneys, and the case evidence is the same. My heart really go out to the family especially the parents of the victim. I'm not sure I would've been able to suffer in relative silence it somebody close to me.
In Sarah's world she's above the rules and that's just a fact of life other people need to accept. At this point I'm convinced she's completely incapable of wrapping her mind around any alternative to that perceived reality. She killed a man, torturously, and genuinely doesn't think she did anything wrong. She's never going to be able to understand and accept something like ethics.
But they had a good day that day, all day!
Always thinks she’s the smartest person in the room…. I would love to see a thorough psychiatric work up of this woman. Kind of reminds me of Leticia Stauch.
I agree, she wants a lawyer to control and get on board with her made up defense strategy.
I only half agree with Peter though, in that i think she might be hoping for a change in her charges. By fighting the process, therefore delaying it, she may think different charges could result. Of course whilst technically a possibility, the State wouldnt do that, but her rediculous (& possibly clinically diagnosable personality) thinks she's able to sway & control people to that extent.
She is a narcissist
@@krystalbrooks3418
I don't see Leticia Stauch. LS was calculated, premeditated, manipulative. #SuitcaseSarah I don't think planned to redrum Jorge or even thought that by being in the Suitcase would even k ill him. She probably thought she'd go to bed, wake up, let him out and idk, it'd be her turn to hide? (You know, because they were playing hide and seek. 🙄) I have no sympathy for her. She is a wretched women. I just don't see her at a Leticia Stauch level conniving, sadistic, pure evil monster, the way I see LS to be. That *itch purposely used Gannon's phone ONLY to call Landon and bath in the emotions it would give Landon, to see her missing son's name pop up on her phone- wishing and hoping it'd be him actually calling. That's top level sick and twisted.
I agree. She's keen to get this trial underway. This lady loves to talk and hear the sound of her voice. She'll be in her element with everyone watching her ramble on.
You want to see a difficult defendant represent themselves? Watch the Darrell Brooks trial. What a sh*t show that was.
Have any defendants who have represented themselves ever been acquitted? I can't think of a SINGLE ONE.
“Carousel of attorneys.” I love that.
In her two interviews with law enforcement, she tells it ALL
Mr. Hobson isn't the only attorney who used ethics-related language. One cited "morals" and a few others cited a "conflict of interest." I think Bankowitz is unique in being genuinely unresponsive to clients, with public reprimands on his record.
She’s commenting on the case b/c she was asked for comment and she agreed to give her opinion. She’s a former judge, but she’s also an active lawyer, so she can give insight from a judge’s perspective as well as an attorney’s.
Yes! And she did so WONDERFULLY with clearly explained knowledge!
Her speech flows beautifully, she doesn't pontificate grandly but keeps it all simple and concise.
❤🩷♀️♀️🩷❤️🩷❤️🩷♀️♀️
I found this judge was very impressive in that case .
i havent watched this as im typing but im guessing he got all self righteous
I think she thinks that if she's a big enough pain to deal with, the courts will get sick of her and just let her go.
I don't think so. She reads more as a narcicist to me. So she absolutely thinks she is right and only did the thing everybody says is so wrong because of the victim and nobody wants to see that. And since she probably has been a narcicist all her life, she's also used to having "inferior" people disagree with her and be complicated with her, but usually she can out-argue them fairly easily. What she has not learned (and can not learn due to being a narcicist) is that they don't give in because she "won" with her arguments, but because she wore them out. So while the technique may _read_ as intentionally wearing out the patience of the court, from her perspective it would be "I just gotta explain this a hundred times, like I always have to with dumb people". She will find out that the court will not be worn out (or in her mind "be convinced by her superior arguments"), which will send her into a deep spiral basically all narcicists go into when finally confronted - violence. I predict at least (!) a verbal outburst on sentencing, maybe even throwing hands with the bailiffs.
I agree with you. I don’t think she wants to delay. I think in her own sick mind she believes people will buy her stupid story and she wants a lawyer to do this her way..
I think she’s delaying unconsciously. Her mind wants to save herself from the reality and what she did. Probably because something went terribly wrong. It’s easier to write letters of „innocence“ or disagree with every lawyer than to have to face the truth in court and get convicted by a Jury. Her only chance is taking the stand and she knows all the evidence against her. It’s a one way ticket, therefore I‘m with Judge Scherer on this. As long as she isn’t convicted, she can betray herself with „her“ truth and that she’s innocent.
I agree. But how long will the court tolerate this, without violating her constitutional rights to counsel, and then if that happens, she walks.
Id love to hear Judge Dorrow's Opinion from the Darrell Brooks Trial in Wisconsin😅
100% agree with you. I think she wants a lawyer that will say exactly what she wants them to say, even if it’s a fraud on the court.
Exactly. In every other aspect of life, we don't get the option to choose what to do. Our boss/employer gets to dictate that. I think she expects a lawyer to be like every other person on earth.
@@Shannon-Smithright, shes expecting "customer is always right" "have it your way" relationship with her attorneys.
The fact that she has drug it out this far Is ridiculous, but the attorneys shouldn't have to put their reputations and careers on the line to cater to miss "not intentional "
@@meganbessenbacher7107 Yes, I think that she is expecting the customer is always right relationship with her attorneys - because she is the customer and they are her employees. Now the attorneys reputations and careers should never be on the line because of the person they represent. The lawyer is supposed to be an expert on the law and use their expertise of the law to defend their client as best they can, unless the customer wants a specific form of defence.
The problem here is the attorneys that think that they get to decide not to give her the defense she wants and thinks that eir career is based somehow on what their client did and how their client wants to be defended.
Public defenders should not have the ability to refuse like this.
@@Shannon-Smith Why would any attorney destroy their reputation and lose their career to allow Sarah to do whatever she wants knowing that it is unethical?
@@sharonhoyt2133 Because they are paid to do a job. The same reason we all do what our employers tell us to do.
Watch the full interrogation. She repeatedly denied being drunk even after seeing the video
I think she thinks that particular denial makes her look like a "better person" and didn't realize that it would actually cause problems for her defense instead. She doesn't realize she can't have it both ways. Either she was negligent and inebriated to the point of being blackout drunk, or else her actions were purposeful. I don't think she has a third option, and she's not self aware enough to realize this.
Ahh, the power of alcoholic denial...
@@MelieneGardneryou nailed it....she wants to be seen as the victim..it wasn't her fault and she didn't do anything herself that made it happen. It just occurred! Jorge got in the suitcase and didn't get out! Why did he have to do that?
Sad to joke that way but this is how Boone wants this to go.
@@MelieneGardnerbut but she didn’t black out according to her she just “fell asleep” 😴 😂😭
@@MelieneGardner Nothing to do with this case in particular, but just one more reason that you should SHUT THE F*CK UP when questioned by police. Say your name, request a lawyer and shut the f*ck up. Anything you say (yes, even the way you greet the officer) can and WILL be used against you.
I think in her head…she’s a unicorn. It’s like nobody in the world has a case like her. And she is not working with attorneys. It’s her way or highway
That old Sarah though.
“NO MALICIOUS!!!”😹😹😹
And certainly not intentional 😂😂
"No malicious CONTENT" 😆
Her and Darrell Brooks both use words they don't understand.
@@mamasunshine80yea and she thinks she’s SO smart… nothing worse than an evil idiot who thinks they’re the smartest in the room
That is my favorite statement she makes...because it is one of those brain went too fast and mouth just kind of expresses this incomplete sentence. No malicious!
She said she didn’t get drunk 2 bottles of wine between the 2 & legally drunk sleeping until noon😳
I absolutely believe she will testify
I didn't feel as if the judge was suggesting the lawyers have requested to withdraw because Sarah Boone wants to take the stand. I was surprised when you paused the video to disagree with her. I always find it fascinating when two people can hear the same thing and perceive it a completely different way.
I was really confused about this as well. The judge made no statement suggesting that’s why the lawyer wanted to withdrawal. I’m sure you didn’t mean to but that was one heck of a straw man argument if I ever saw one 😂.
I think you are right in that she wants her day in court, but i also think the judge is right in that she doesn't like the evidence.
SHE IS DEFINITELY DELAYING THIS CASE. She has no defense!
I think SB wants to tell her story her way. And no one is going to change her mind, not even her attorneys and they know it won't go well for her... Imo
I agree with you, Peter. Why should she delay, when she is already locked up. What she wants is control, and probably to take the stand, which will convict her right away. Thank you for your work 😁
ME ME ME ME ME!!!! Not one tear for Jorge
Yes with all the letters, not one mentions Jorge. But she can’t because she believes she’s innocent and it would make her look guilty. His poor family.
We totally need an emoji for “Woof” Love when Peter says that lol
🐶
I totally agree. 😂
It is cute like a little boy .😂
She not only mocked him. She moved the suitcase around. She also told the police the suitcase was in the upstairs closet… Jeorge went to hide.. and then two neighbors. Heard a loud sound from upstairs to the downstairs within a 15 minute period,
That tells me she found him upstairs, hiding in the suitcase, convinced him to be zipped up, and then she tossed him down the stairs. And then, like an orca does with a seal she played with him. … her sentencing will be awesome.
I do think she is trying to delay it in a way, especially if her lawyer doesn’t defend her in the way she wants. Either you defend her how she wants you to or she will continue to try and get it delayed until someone will do what she wants.
Peter, you are100% correct! She's positive she can talk her way out of this! She thinks she is exceptional!
Yeah she said over & over she was good in school - HS😳 no college, no fancy high paying job & in her 40s😜☠️
If she wants to testify and they know she will lie, would that be reason to withdraw??
I think the prosecution can challenge that. So I doubt it can be valid… but I could be wrong
I think he’s answered this before in other circumstances. IIRC, a lawyer can’t suborn perjury. If they know she is going to lie, she can get on the stand and testify in narrative form. The lawyer generally wouldn’t ask questions in that case. But I think generally they can withdraw if the defendant wants them to commit fraud upon the court.
I feel like it's a case of "my way or the highway".
Peter, Sarah Boone wants a trial but on her terms only and, in my opinion, this is the reason for the holdup. As for Judge Scherer, she was asked for her insights--right or wrong--she gave them.She has a right to her opinion.
I hope she gets shipped to Waukesha to stand trial before Judge Dorow and for the next 3.5 weeks demand that subject matter jurisdiction be proven on the record.
Hey Peter Thanks 4 keeping up in the Loop! Have a great weekend, take care😊
No way, Peter.
I completely agree with the Judge and I've always felt this way about SB.
SB is putting off going to trial as long as she possibly can, because she knows how its going to turn out.
I enjoyed your first time viewing and giving feedback with this clip. It was fun! Thanks! 👍🏻
Thanks for doing this, I’m learning a lot!
She is delaying in the hopes of getting an attorney to agree with the defence she wants.
This was a most informative/educational video .Thanks Peter❤❤@The Lawyer you Know Have a great weekend everyone ❤Stay safe
I was hoping you'd cover this! Thanks! (I wish this judge would also do commentary on the Crumbley cases.)
I'm sure she realizes she spoke too much to the police officers who responded to the scene, as well as to the interrogators later at the police station. The video from her phone is incriminating. Given all this, I'm sure her previous lawyers have tried to formulate the best defense argument possible while still maintaining their ethical responsibilities. I think she views ethical responsibilities as a nuisance and an obstacle to be overcome. She can't get past "unintentional." I agree with you Peter that she's not delaying a trial for the sake of delaying. I think she views herself as the brainchild of her own defense strategy and that she's looking for a malleable attorney who will merely act as a technician.
Thank you Peter for this video!🙏😊
I’d love to hear your perspective on the Traconis case!🙏😊
Love your new set up!
I feel EXTREMELY comfortable saying that Sarah most likely has asked every single attorney to ‘ look pass the evidence ‘. The way she tried to control the interrogation says it all.
Thanks!
Part of me feels this way, she knows how badly the videos present her, and she is playing around to be the crnter of focus while delaying her trial. I can't shake that feeling. But mostly I feel her alcohol abuse allowed her to leave her boyfriend in a suticase, ignoring his pleas for help and she is in total denial
I agree with you Pete. She wants it her way!
Transparent Tea has a new video showing her behavior incidents from the jail. I was entertained to see she's been written up multiple times for refusing to attend her court hearings, makes sense given all we know about her.
Thanks for the info, I’ll check it out
Thats interesting because in all those letters she writes to the judges, she always says she wasn't at such and such hearing and it's her right to be at EVERY hearing and that she wants to be at every hearing.
I'll check out the video, thanks for telling us about it!
@@SamanthaLeigh7Everything is documented, Transparent Tea is very good channel.
This was a great recommend. She has stuff I haven't seen before and I feel like I've watched everything on this case.
That's Exactly what you said when you read the last letter from the Attorney! I definitely could see Boone wanting something unethical to be done by her Attorney! 💜🤯💛🥰💜
As an Australian solicitor/lawyer I find the U.S Justice system almost circus like ..
You should watch the Fani Willis trial🤣🤣🤣
It is. On TV and UA-cam as entertainment.
In Australia murderers go to jail for like 15 years lol. That's the joke
And gRapists and kiddy fiddlers get single digit years and suspended sentences
@@EmperorOfManthat's not actually true. It differs per state but life imprisonment is mandatory for murder in South Austrailia most of the rest are 20 to life depending on the age of the victim.
@Peter Tragos or @Lawyer You know
Here's a prediction of a scenario that fits this Judge's speculations and the lawyers' withdrawals:
Bankowitz opened a door for Sarah Boone when he proposed the battered spouse defense. Sarah Boone has either
1) expressed to her Lawyers she will tell an expert lies about her and Jorge's domestic violence to make herself appear as only the victim and never the perpetrator
2) told her lawyers differing accounts of the DV to where they know she is lying
3) has done both of these and expressed she will give false testimony regarding the DV
Bless you ❤
Good stuff 🎉
No. She totally believes she's going home
So glad you have the Parkland judge on here. I think she had hell during that case with those disrespectful defence lawyers.
I THINK SHE IS TRYING TO DELAY IT BECAUSE SHE KNOWS SHE'S GUILTY, AND SHE WANTS AS MUCH LIBERTY AS POSSIBLE...SHE IS GUILTY AS HELL...WHY ARE YOU ON HER SIDE..
SHE CLOSED THAT ZIPPER AND WAS ANGRY AT THE GUY. AND WANTED TO PUNISH HIM...
GET IT OVER WITH TOO MUCH MONEY IS BEING SPENT TRYING TO KEEP CHANGING JUDGES... SHE IS GUILTY...
PERIOD!!!!
That was very enlightening. I wish she was still on the bench. Thank you for putting this up on your channel. Shake off the week and have a great weekend!
It must be hell on earth dealing with her!!! It doesn’t matter what lawyer she has, she’s all done!!!!
Delaying the trial actually does help Sarah IMO because she has to suspect, as many do, that Prison is FAR worse than the County Jail.
Beautiful backdrop!
Sarah Boone's explanation of why her now deceased boyfriend was in the suitcase is absolutely ridiculous! She claims that they were playing hide and seek but they were the only two playing and she put him in the suitcase so she knew where he was so how is that playing hide and seek? It absolutely makes no sense! I cannot believe that no one has mentioned this! The object of this game is to seek out the players that are hiding, hence the name Hide and Seek. If she put him in the suitcase and knew where he was then he's obviously not hiding and she's not seeking! She needed to come up with a reason to explain why he was in the suitcase but its ludacris to say that you're playing hide and seek with only one other person that you yourself put into the hiding place!
A drunken game of Hide and Seek. I think he got into the suitcase willingly, thinking it was funny and then she found him and zipped him in.
The trial will show what happened. Neighbor heard fighting, quiet then boom down the stairs, what about the bat? Before the stairs or after? Drunk or not, she wanted revenge.
@@jenniebailey3642 Maybe
I too don't think she's delaying. She absolutely thinks she's smarter than everybody else and believes she'll get off with her crazy lies.
Peter. You are too kind and professional lol. I appreciate your honesty
Literally everything she says "I'm the blue-eyed white dragon" I can't help but think of Yugi-Oh! When I heard the interviewer say "what do you think of that?" My brain went "I think she plays Yugi-oh!"
Good morning Peter and crew ❤
Guilty as Charged. Prison !! ⚖️
Totally agree with Peter. I think she doesn't understand that regardless of her intention, it is still murder.
"BUT IT WASN'T INTENTIONAL!"
"Oh, ok Sarah. As long as you say it wasn't intentional (even though the video YOU took proves otherwise) then were all good and you can go home." --Exactly what she expected them to say. 🤦🏼♀️
If i recall correctly her story to investigators was they pulled the suitcase & loads of clothes that her son had out grew to pack up and take suitcase to donation. So how does it turn out instead of sons clothes being packed Jorge is packed up?? 😮😮
Boone better call Saul. 😂😂
I don't believe she wants to delay,I believe she wants her lawyer to present this her way, exactly what you said
She's gonna for sure testify to try and talk her way out of it. And her asking her lawyers to do something they can't make sense with how many she's gone through
It can be both? Delay and wants it her way
Hey Peter, Great video! If you could do a quick video on the Activision vs. Hector and Scump lawsuit, if you have time.
Is a defense attorney required to take any particular action if the defendant insists on testifying (regardless of the attorney’s advice) and then lies on the stand and the defense attorney knows (after the fact) that the defendant has lied?
This is a great question. I think the lawyer has a duty if they know their client lied on the stand; but I’m not sure how it is actually handled. Maybe Peter will answer.
Hiya to everyone. Thanks as always, Peter. Much love and light to all of our community. 🫶🏻
In respect to her relationships with her lawyers there is one common denominator…her. I’m no lawyer but I’m almost willing to bet that she is still unwilling to accept responsibility for what she has done. In her mind, she fully believes she is the victim and that thinking probably leaves her unwilling to accept the consequences for her actions. Her lawyers are probably telling her, “Look Sarah, you’re going to be doing a significant amount of prison time, the big question is how much time.” The fact she hasn’t plead guilty to me means she doesn’t think she did anything wrong. At some point this judge is going to get tired of all the delays and the amount of taxpayer money this eats up. He will schedule a trial and tell her that it will be happening whether or not she has representation. Also, it could affect her sentencing as well, especially in a case with so much incriminating evidence.
She wants "I didn't mean to" to = not guilty.
Hi Peter, im not sure if you’ve discussed before, but would you take a look at the Derek Rosa case that’s happening in Florida?
Ah, what is better than one lawyer speculating about the case - two lawyers speculating about the case! 😊
How do we find your merch? I looked on the headers and didn’t see any “store” or how to view your shirts etc.
😬watching a smidge late !!! Hi all LYK crew!!!
What do you do if you put a client on the stand, and they lie unexpectedly?
my biggest worry about this case is- this will create the template for other defendants as a "how to delay your trial infinitely" depending on how long this goes without forcing her to move on and go to trial. In fact, is it possible Boone is savvy enough to already learn the more difficult she is, the more conflicts she gets into with counsel, the longer she can delay this. And even continue to test the courts on how long she can indefinitely delay her trial?
It’s an old tactic but probably more successful back in the day when cases relied heavily on witness testimony (which fades or ppl die) or evidence that might get lost or deteriorate over time. At least now with digital camera footage, better ways to collect, analyze, preserve DNA and other physical evidence, a case can be “on ice” for a while. That bodycam video of the suitcase will be just as poignant down the road as it is now. It’s her own memory which might get addled the longer she dwadles! I think SB wants to control everything rather than trust someone else knows better how to mount her defense.
I agree with the judge
Why is everyone still calling her “judge” when she is no longer a judge?
Often people who attain a high position retain the title part even after they step down, it’s a courtesy thing.
Judge Scherer saying Boone isn't very smart😂 According to Boone she is the smartest person.
She wants to put on some defense and it’s a defense that the lawyers can’t do!
Hey everyone
I have sure missed you guys!!! 😊
I would love to get your opinion on Suzanne morphew case.
Definitely disagree with the judge that Sarah Boone is trying to delay this case. I honestly think Sarah Boone completely believes she isn’t in the wrong here and she truly believes in all of her efforts. It’s very evident to me in some of things she says in her letters.
Hey-yo, Happy Friday🎉
thanks for commenting
I don’t believe they were playing hide and seek. I don’t believe she “accidentally” fell asleep. I believe they were drinking and fighting, she beat him and put him in the suitcase, filmed it, and thought she’d let him stay there as long as she saw fit. She was probably so drunk she didn’t care if he lived or died, and went to bed. She probably didn’t *expect* him to die, because she’s not smart (even though she says she excels at everything and was a straight A student 90 years ago). She probably woke up, went to the suitcase to “let him out,” saw that Jorge had died, panicked, called her ex-husband, who told her to call 9-1-1. She called and pretended to be doing CPR-she was merely counting out loud, CPR is exhausting and there was no sound of exertion while she was counting, nor was there any sound of her putting the phone down to administer CPR. She tried to think of a cover story to explain how and why Jorge even got in the suitcase so she fabricated a story that they were having a “good day” and they were “playing hide and seek” and then as a “joke” Jorge got into the suitcase. She even said to the first responding officer “We both were laughing about it.” (Lie.) Almost every word out of her mouth is a lie. She is definitely guilty of second degree murder, though she feels that it being “unintentional” means one is off the hook completely in the eyes of the law. She is absolutely unbelievably selfish, narcissistic, and powerfully stupid.
She's been in jail 4 yrs now. Could she be stalling in order to bank some "time served" for sentencing?
I think she is not accepting any responsibility and maybe she does wants to delay, but mainly because the attorneys have been telling her that she won't get off, so she gets mad. She thinks she should get off scot-free.
Good day everyone
I am hopeful that this female lawyer Boone has now will be able to whip her client into shape to get this trial back on track.