Holosun 407K X2 vs 507K X2 Reticles - it’s the only difference (besides price) - Freedom Gorilla

[@Dbshortz420]

I got my 507k for 250$ and the 407k is 225 at my local shop didn’t mind paying the extra $ considering the larger circle provides quicker acquisition for me

[@TacticalJay.]

We’re did you get the 507k for that price I only see the 407k at 250 please let me know

[@RAS3800]

Would also love to know where you found the 507 for that price

[@weduhpeople8504]

The 407k x2 is alot cheaper and less shaky with the 6 moa dot. I’ll be testing both and form my own opinion for two ccw pistols. If too shaky for a pistol I’ll mount it on my Scar 17s that has a Spuhr qd mount as a transition rds for cqb on a 45 degree section of the mount.

[@freedomgorilla1]

Yep it is cheaper. And the dot is nice. I like the 407k a lot. Nice backup plan and congrats on having a SCAR that’s awesome.

[@christianknight2905]

How did testing turn out. Thinking the 507x2 with 32moa and run it ⭕ only

[@BlockedDeeBo]

I have the green version of the 507K X2. It does solar charging which I don't see on the 407. 507 reticle can be adjusted too. I think they are both great.

[@freedomgorilla1]

Thx for the comment. The 507 K doesn’t have a solar panel. The 507 C does and the 407 C those are different than the K

[@dn5101]

I went with the 508c-x2 instead

[@PatrickHennings-x2d]

6 MOA dots suck unless you’re blind

[@freedomgorilla1]

Disagree

[@Spaceman2484]

These are for subcompact carry pistols, not shooting out 100yds+ (though you still could with effort probably)

[@jonboy9734]

Up close. They will shoot you faster due to faster sight acquisition.

[@kevinli9035]

Logically incorrect. Blind people will just say 6 MOAs are as good, or as suck as 2 MOA

[@freekinfreak1]

Unless you are target shooting, 6 MOA will give you faster acquisition of your target. But please explain why it sucks so bad seeing that you didn’t.