Yep. I still feel like there is a visual downgrade, but not nearly as noticeable as 120fps. It seems like a good balance, keeping higher picture quality while getting up to 100fps.
Side note, the fact that a game is running with RT on + 4K Native resolution @ 90fps is amazing and shows what can be done when you optimize a game for the PS5.
Definitely the best compromise if you have a VRR display. The locked 120 mode on the other hand has a terrible resolution and looks unbearable for a PS5 game.
@@anabang1251 i agree. It’s a low resolution, especially when you saw GT7 running in the native 4K for over a year before. The „90-100 fps mode“ is a perfect bias.
If you have VRR on, there is no downgrade whatsoever. It's still native 4K with same visual settings as before. If your TV does not support VRR however, then yes Resolution mode + 120Hz renders at sub native resolution.
Physics and heptic feedback is improved, with all these new features/updates it feels and looks so much better, when it rains, you can feel it through the pad now. So you feel before you see it. Edit: Not sure but it appears latest patch removed the rain dualsense feedback, shame . . . I liked it
You are right, this plays sooo much better now...its almost like a new GT7 + ... it was fine before but everything is just so much smoother and responsive... love it
I mean FFB is a function of physics and the suspension/tyre model they changed. Now it's more in line with reality. Hardest change for me is the ABS severely affects your trail braking now.
This is how every modern game should be designed. Inherently, any game that runs "locked 60fps" will be running around 80fps average, it's really bizarre that a simple option to unlock the framerate wasn't automatically made universal with XSX/PS5.
I run a 4k 65" Samsung at 120fps here in UA. I did not bother with ray tracing as it is only for replays.... What I have is a crystal clear experience with this and am 100% pleased.
i played the new patch for about 20min. as soon as i set to 120 i noticed all the jaggies, after tweaking it i tried the resolution mode with 120 and it looked pretty close to the old 60fps performance. it does feel much smoother and more reactive now
Ray tracing is not used in replays when 120fps is on, even if you select ray tracing/resolution. Ray tracing only shows in replays at 30fps (when 120 fps toggle is off)
The HDR content in this channel is absolutely top notch good sir. Heard of this channel from Classy Tech, another great techtuber who recommended you for you excellent HDR coverage of games which no one else is doing at the same high level. Insta-subbed. Cheers!
I stick to "Frame Rate 60hz" mode because even in the "Resolution 120hz Mode" you can see a downgrade of the image. It looks good, i guess it's around 1440p-1800p but you have less light reflections and the image still feels a bit blurry compared to 4K mode. I prefer the sharp 4K look and to be honest, 60fps is very smooth and good for my eyes, 30fps make my eye hurt, but anything above 60fps is not really needed. I recommend 120hz Frame Rate Mode when it comes to online racing (playing against other players), but playing against AI, i stick to 4K Frame Rate
there is no difference between 120hz resolution and 60hz resolution. It's the same graphics only with open FPS. I was able to see it myself at home. There is no difference, only if you choose the frame rate 120hz then it looks worse
Very glad you made this video, I did not like the new one 120fps mode because it dropped the resolution. Now I will go back and check it out again using this setting.
You're not imagining things, the update included comprehensive changes to every part of the physics, from tire simulation, aerodynamics, suspension, and even changes to the gamepad control input system as well. Every car in the game handles more realistically now. Cars that were too snappy and hard to drive are now more stable, and cars that were too sluggish and boat like are lighter and livelier.
I agree changes are positive, but some cars handle much worse. GT-R was a boat when braking, now it's a boat all the time and braking after a fast straight is almost impossible.
@@kresimircosic9035 Then I expect they will keep fine tuning the physics in future updates. This update made road cars feel much better in general, which I think has been a weakness since GT Sport. That game was more focused on making race cars fun. Now the game as a whole feels better balanced, and I’m finding all cars more enjoyable. I haven’t tried any GT-R though with this update. Hopefully we won’t have to wait until GT8 before they feel authentic. I think it’s a good sign they noticed that the physics and controls could be better and did the work to change them in a patch. Usually that doesn’t happen.
@@PeterHas Yeah, for example the NISMO GT-R handle much better, but the regular one is a much worse boat than it was. So hard to drive (speaking with SM tyres, not some RSSSSSSS tyres)
@@kresimircosic9035 The sports tyres definitely have less grip than they should. There's a video of Keiichi Tsuchiya of Hot Version trying out GT Sport for the first time. He picks a car and track he's driven countless times in real life, and he noticed that the sports tyres all had much worse grip than the real life car. To get a realistic level of grip he had to swap to racing tyres. I'm guessing GT7 is still similar, that the sports tyres can't match the performance of real life performance street tyres.
I played on it today with resolution / RT and o can honestly say it’s the best racing game I ever played graphically .. Massive improvement so thank you sir. Ahh it even looks better than the latest Forza ..
You aren't wrong about the handling, there are other dedicated sim racing channels talking about the same thing. Steering wheel setups are much more reactive now at 120hz. Unfortunately I have my driving setup on a separate TV to my C1 so I will have to sacrifice using my wheel to test it out at 120hz to confirm.
If they had VRR to make this mode a reality at launch, better late than never but they kind of missed the initial window to market with the game. unlocked with full quality, the PC dream I always wanted on console
what s your tv details in this settings? i have lg c2 48'' but the warm 50 and the ''color 55'' make the sky not so blue like yours!!! your image look fantastic....what s the setup ? thanks
Just to clarify, it’s from 4K down to 1080p, you can see the resolution drop by pressing your tv info (depending on your tv: it will show 1920x1080, HDR, UHD marker will be gone), this is even with prioritise resolution option turned on within the GT7 settings. However, If your hdtv supports 1440p and VRR, then that should be the best result but it’s still nonetheless a drop from the usual 4k resolution in order to obtain the desired 120. Also it’s not just a resolution drop: they most likely have taken out on-track details (such as reduced number of trees, foliage, fewer grass and road textures, less crowds and people, removing background enhancements like fireworks, airplanes, drones and helicopters etc) and removed motion blur and anti-aliasing etc. It is absolutely not in 4K, at the max it is QHD, which is 1440p.
Did you even watch the video??? What you are talking about is 120FPS with prefer performance mode, what he is talking about is 120FPS with preferred resolution mode and that mode is indeed 4K....it's technically the 60FPS mode with unlocked framerates
@@vyasrushi5177 check your tv info, it shows clearly what resolution it’s at with those settings, do you know how to bring the info up on your tv while gt7 is running with those settings? No need to get hostile over something like this
@@agolice7649 why would I lie? This is what the tv signal is telling me and it’s not based on research plus I am not making it up. Before you attack someone, why don’t you check your tv settings info with those gt7 settings on and see what the tv tells you. Sacrifices have to be made in order to achieve 120, my friend.
@fishLANGS if that's what YOUR tv info says, then it's more likely that your tv can't handle 120htz or you have the wrong HDMI cable (the supplied ps5 cable works fine) my LG CX runs it 120 at 4k just fine.
There's definitely a pretty clear visual downgrade even in this mode. The lighting isn't as good/realistic and the reflective textures are way more diffused, there's slightly more pop in too. So I'd say it is worth a side by side for sure. I use 120 mode for license tests but everything else I still prefer raytracing 60 mode, it looks so real, I'm constantly in awe.
I truly think you may need to make a video for those that use a LG CX,C1,G3, etc and use the gaming mode FPS counter and find that it either stays static at 59fps or 119fps. Never fluctuates and changes. Which is kinda strange. Are we set up wrong somewhere within one the devices?
Yes, 120hz performance looks much worse than 60hz. unfortunately on sony x90h when you use VRR local dimming is disabled so colors are not that great so I stick with 60hz.
I have the same TV. The resolution also suffered as well and I also found it has more motion blur. 60Hz is the best for this TV. I guess I need to upgrade this TV soon.
There is a BIG difference in colour mapping or something. Once i enable the 120hz mode ingame the dark grey sections are light grey and all the colours are jist faded…
And i see this with more games. Like horizon zero dawn. The graphical modes are always way nicer, because its not only resolution, its colouring and deep blacks etc. Once u enable the 120hz modes on those games, blacks are not as pure, colours like blue and red are not as “bright” of clear, greys are foggy etc etc. Rather play 60fps with nice graphics then 120fps with lesser colours
@DoctorSilva Correct, it did this from release date on gt7. That's why im asking which hdr settings the first comment is referring too. I want to know if ive missed any other settings but im sure i haven't.
Man what they do with ffb is amazing! My t300 on 4/2 driving Audi rs5 gr.2 is brutal, only problem is that after 30min motors are to hot… But anyway, I just can’t wait for console version of t818
Basically you're paying a few hundred extra dollars for 30 frames more from a native 4k 60Hz. The fact one can go from an indistinguishable difference of 120-90 shows frames aren't that big of a deal, just as how it already runs smoothly at 60 as stated. It's like paying for Nike when the unbranded shoes get you the same quality.
I don’t understand why anyone would play GT7 on a flat screen anymore so, while its a nice free improvement, it feels a bit of a “previous gen” improvement.
Picture quality and screen tech inside a VR headset still lags behind a 4K OLED screen. Plus, not everyone can play VR for longer sessions. VR is the future but with its current limitations it should be complimentary to a screen (for now). Good thing switching between flat and VR in GT7 is seemless AF.
Well, most people don't have a VR headset. So upgrades to the flat screen version are welcome. But you are right. After trying this game in VR, I don't think I'll ever play it flat-screen. Sure, a TV looks better, but the immersion VR gives you, especially for games in a cockpit/driver seat, is much better.
@@exgeeinteractive picture quality in 2D now feels redundant (I have a 65” VFR OLED) as the benefits of 3D far outweigh everything. Back in the original Oculus Rift days I agree that quality was too poor (I loved Project Cars 2) but it’s now “good enough” and the cars are transformed beyond belief if you’ve never seen VR. I feel like I’m driving a car now and not playing a game on a TV. Add in a G Pro wheel and its a full workout lol. Appreciate not everyone can afford a VR headset and DD wheel but if you can afford an OLED TV… £$
@@sawdust8691 yeah I don’t mean to disrespect people without a VR headset and all improvements in gameplay are great for the community. It’s the UA-camrs I really feel sorry for as they currently have to stream in 2D to engage with their community while secretly playing in VR whenever else they can. We need headset streaming integration as well as third party apps like Sim Dashboard
@@markbooth Nahhh, picture quality is still far off, unless we're talking about a Pimax Crystal levels of resolution+screen+lenses. Played GT7 on VR at launch with my rig (got mine in March 24th) and I believe everything that you said. But the PSVR2 is still a hard sale for many, prolly because of the price tag and launch library syndrome.
S95b will make 60fps looks better than 120fps image quality and as smooth as the VRR 80 to 100 fps fluctuation that the game is showing up. Try it out it will smooth everything and clean up the downgrade in resolution. Turn off game mode and use the pitcture clarity mode on 10 blur reduction and 10 on judder.
How was the input lag? I think anything other than game mode would induce unplayable amount of input lag especially when you turn on the dejudder feature.
I'm pretty sure this is off-topic... but as long as GT keeps ignoring collision damage, it will always be a "Hot Wheels" simulation to me, no matter the fps rate.
@@Rob-eg8qc I understand, but I don't care about which deal has been done between the company and car brands... as long as I have decent collision damage simulation.
it will no different from the others. Fun for a bit then everyone will go online and get rammed into the first corner with no punishment to the offender on every race which causes anyone who takes racing games serious to stop playing and go back to better games like GT7, ACC and Iracing
With your talent, i dont understand why u missplace information about fps and the build in game optimizer.😂 you do know its not a real fps counter ? It just shows the hrtz of the tv and your using boost mode to output the signal to 120hrtz😅 The 119 is the Hz of the signal strength. Doesn't mean you'll actually achieve 120fps ingame😂 Use fraps for real actual fps. Or digital foundry. Same as with god of war ragnerok. 120 fps mode actual ingame fps is between 80 and 90 and yes tested bij digital foundry. While lg shows 119 with the game optimizer ;)
You are wrong sorry. Within the vrr range Hz and FPS are the same. The game has a very stable 120fps mode and a 60fps+ mode . The game optimiser on the LG is showing the correct values here.
@@GamingTech-UA-cam I am not wrong, was waiting for you to say this. Check digital foundry god of war ragnerok review. The game max fps on 120 mode is between 80 and 90 fps. And the tv say 119 ;) So what u say now is that digital foundry is wrong 😂 but i am sure u wont replay back on this comment. Discussion closed.
@@darylkeam7670 That's just wrong. If you are in the VRR Range the number is correct. You can see it in my video: ua-cam.com/video/Cdg7AC8QQoE/v-deo.html . Not sure why this is so hard to understand?! What is the timestamp in the video from DF where I can see this? Link?
@@darylkeam7670 Have you checked DF video about GT7? Who is wrong now? Next time get you facts right before you are accusing someone of misplacing information.!
@@darylkeam7670 discussion is not closed until you watch the DF GT7 120 htz mode video. (Instead of watching the GoW video, which is a different game) GT7 runs 120 fps
Sony is such greedy fools killing GT7 by not putting it on PC where it would shine at 144fps on a great rig. Imagine how nice it would be for the health of the Dev's to get an extra 100 million + in sales. I now no longer support Sony in any of their business's. Vote with $$$ I bought a Sammy TV
Lol, so 90% of PC players can pirate it?? NO Thanks....they will only release it on PC once the GT7's PS5 version dies down in sales, maybe late 2024??? not anytime soon
Ya, the current consoles have some great bang for buck. More so than ever before. I've considered going PC in the past. But I found I am satisfied with these consoles and can't really justify getting a PC to myself. The consoles give a great game experience for so much cheaper.
@Sawdust I agree I was looking into pc before getting a series x ... im playing games at basically high to ultra settings at 60fps between 1440p/4k as I said there literally a 2080super/ ti witch still gives a great gameing experience.
@@lukemorris9066 Yep. And the console optimization makes up for a lot in the power gap between PC and Console. If you want a PC experience that's better than a console, you need parts that are a lot more powerful and expensive. And it seems PC has also been having a lot of problems lately. Games not being properly optimized, so even on the highest teir PC it runs like garbage while consoles do fine. That's the developers fault, but still. I couldn't help but notice that Hogwarts ran fine on console while it stuttered its way through PC. And a lot of games do the same until they are fixed. So while PC is the top dog for gaming, the consoles appeal to me more. Less problems, more bang for the buck, and overall deliver a good experience.
@Sawdust to have a clear jump over the current gen consoles you'd need a 3070 witch is a heavy buck and as you say games are hit and miss on pc witch isn't great seen as the money they cost ... as I said high to ultra settings at 60fps/4k/1440p is a seriously good gameing experience
This is just awesome...Great Visual Quality and up to 120FPS!
You loose quality even with this mode . I switched back to 60 /120 off . I have 65” LG CX . More jaggies AA with 120hz on & Resolution:Ray tracing ON
Yep.
I still feel like there is a visual downgrade, but not nearly as noticeable as 120fps.
It seems like a good balance, keeping higher picture quality while getting up to 100fps.
Side note, the fact that a game is running with RT on + 4K Native resolution @ 90fps is amazing and shows what can be done when you optimize a game for the PS5.
This update really got me back into playing it again
Update is fantastic.
I play with 120hz mode and the Resolution/RT mode.
Visual downgrade is not huge but the game runs so smooth.
Definitely the best compromise if you have a VRR display. The locked 120 mode on the other hand has a terrible resolution and looks unbearable for a PS5 game.
@@anabang1251 i agree. It’s a low resolution, especially when you saw GT7 running in the native 4K for over a year before.
The „90-100 fps mode“ is a perfect bias.
There is no visual downgrade with 120hz resolution mode thats what makes it so good.
If you have VRR on, there is no downgrade whatsoever. It's still native 4K with same visual settings as before.
If your TV does not support VRR however, then yes Resolution mode + 120Hz renders at sub native resolution.
@@migez1it uses a lower res. The video is wrong on this. Its not a huge difference but it's a downgrade nonetheless.
Physics and heptic feedback is improved, with all these new features/updates it feels and looks so much better, when it rains, you can feel it through the pad now. So you feel before you see it.
Edit: Not sure but it appears latest patch removed the rain dualsense feedback, shame . . . I liked it
That's pretty cool. I'd probably love that if I wasn't on a racing setup!
@Tubetech can't beat a good racing setup 👍
You are right, this plays sooo much better now...its almost like a new GT7 + ... it was fine before but everything is just so much smoother and responsive... love it
The updated physics and FFB are a game changer.. it's one step closer to Assetto Corsa Competitzione
I mean FFB is a function of physics and the suspension/tyre model they changed. Now it's more in line with reality. Hardest change for me is the ABS severely affects your trail braking now.
This is how every modern game should be designed.
Inherently, any game that runs "locked 60fps" will be running around 80fps average, it's really bizarre that a simple option to unlock the framerate wasn't automatically made universal with XSX/PS5.
You're absolutely right games like apex can't still be on 60 fps while being a br game
I run a 4k 65" Samsung at 120fps here in UA. I did not bother with ray tracing as it is only for replays.... What I have is a crystal clear experience with this and am 100% pleased.
The post launch support for this game has been incredible dear lord!
Desgrciadoo
i played the new patch for about 20min. as soon as i set to 120 i noticed all the jaggies, after tweaking it i tried the resolution mode with 120 and it looked pretty close to the old 60fps performance. it does feel much smoother and more reactive now
Ray tracing is not used in replays when 120fps is on, even if you select ray tracing/resolution. Ray tracing only shows in replays at 30fps (when 120 fps toggle is off)
The HDR content in this channel is absolutely top notch good sir. Heard of this channel from Classy Tech, another great techtuber who recommended you for you excellent HDR coverage of games which no one else is doing at the same high level.
Insta-subbed. Cheers!
Thanks!
Considering that polyphony went from 1.30 to 1.31 this is a great update 😊
Your work is amazing cheer's 🎉
There is no motion blur when 120hz output is active😊
I stick to "Frame Rate 60hz" mode because even in the "Resolution 120hz Mode" you can see a downgrade of the image. It looks good, i guess it's around 1440p-1800p but you have less light reflections and the image still feels a bit blurry compared to 4K mode. I prefer the sharp 4K look and to be honest, 60fps is very smooth and good for my eyes, 30fps make my eye hurt, but anything above 60fps is not really needed.
I recommend 120hz Frame Rate Mode when it comes to online racing (playing against other players), but playing against AI, i stick to 4K Frame Rate
there is no difference between 120hz resolution and 60hz resolution. It's the same graphics only with open FPS. I was able to see it myself at home. There is no difference, only if you choose the frame rate 120hz then it looks worse
Very glad you made this video, I did not like the new one 120fps mode because it dropped the resolution. Now I will go back and check it out again using this setting.
This game is just amazing … the best racing game ever
Well yeah..
You're not imagining things, the update included comprehensive changes to every part of the physics, from tire simulation, aerodynamics, suspension, and even changes to the gamepad control input system as well. Every car in the game handles more realistically now. Cars that were too snappy and hard to drive are now more stable, and cars that were too sluggish and boat like are lighter and livelier.
I agree changes are positive, but some cars handle much worse. GT-R was a boat when braking, now it's a boat all the time and braking after a fast straight is almost impossible.
@@kresimircosic9035 Then I expect they will keep fine tuning the physics in future updates. This update made road cars feel much better in general, which I think has been a weakness since GT Sport. That game was more focused on making race cars fun. Now the game as a whole feels better balanced, and I’m finding all cars more enjoyable. I haven’t tried any GT-R though with this update. Hopefully we won’t have to wait until GT8 before they feel authentic. I think it’s a good sign they noticed that the physics and controls could be better and did the work to change them in a patch. Usually that doesn’t happen.
@@PeterHas Yeah, for example the NISMO GT-R handle much better, but the regular one is a much worse boat than it was. So hard to drive (speaking with SM tyres, not some RSSSSSSS tyres)
@@kresimircosic9035 The sports tyres definitely have less grip than they should. There's a video of Keiichi Tsuchiya of Hot Version trying out GT Sport for the first time. He picks a car and track he's driven countless times in real life, and he noticed that the sports tyres all had much worse grip than the real life car. To get a realistic level of grip he had to swap to racing tyres. I'm guessing GT7 is still similar, that the sports tyres can't match the performance of real life performance street tyres.
wow, thats really nice :)
I played on it today with resolution / RT and o can honestly say it’s the best racing game I ever played graphically ..
Massive improvement so thank you sir.
Ahh it even looks better than the latest Forza ..
I use a fanatec DD1 podium and the Force feedback is much improved
The patch fixed fixed a lot.. especially with Nürburg
You have the feeling because the physics are updated
I posted these findings on another video. Glad the word is getting around
You aren't wrong about the handling, there are other dedicated sim racing channels talking about the same thing. Steering wheel setups are much more reactive now at 120hz. Unfortunately I have my driving setup on a separate TV to my C1 so I will have to sacrifice using my wheel to test it out at 120hz to confirm.
Your EV exposure setting is at zero, but your HDR video said to put it to -0.3. Suspicious! 🤨
Its Funny cause its exactly this type of flickering that i see in person when i use the 120fps + VRR mode....
I am very unlucky
Great stuff, will be busy until Forza comes out.
If they had VRR to make this mode a reality at launch, better late than never but they kind of missed the initial window to market with the game. unlocked with full quality, the PC dream I always wanted on console
Ah thank you my friend.
I hope that in the future Gran Turismo will also be available on PC
Impressive. I have a PS5 1215 boxed and unused, i think its time to do it.
what s your tv details in this settings? i have lg c2 48'' but the warm 50 and the ''color 55'' make the sky not so blue like yours!!! your image look fantastic....what s the setup ? thanks
Just to clarify, it’s from 4K down to 1080p, you can see the resolution drop by pressing your tv info (depending on your tv: it will show 1920x1080, HDR, UHD marker will be gone), this is even with prioritise resolution option turned on within the GT7 settings.
However, If your hdtv supports 1440p and VRR, then that should be the best result but it’s still nonetheless a drop from the usual 4k resolution in order to obtain the desired 120.
Also it’s not just a resolution drop: they most likely have taken out on-track details (such as reduced number of trees, foliage, fewer grass and road textures, less crowds and people, removing background enhancements like fireworks, airplanes, drones and helicopters etc) and removed motion blur and anti-aliasing etc.
It is absolutely not in 4K, at the max it is QHD, which is 1440p.
Did you even watch the video??? What you are talking about is 120FPS with prefer performance mode, what he is talking about is 120FPS with preferred resolution mode and that mode is indeed 4K....it's technically the 60FPS mode with unlocked framerates
you're talking nonsense dude.. do your research well before throwing out this kind of answer..
@@vyasrushi5177 check your tv info, it shows clearly what resolution it’s at with those settings, do you know how to bring the info up on your tv while gt7 is running with those settings? No need to get hostile over something like this
@@agolice7649 why would I lie? This is what the tv signal is telling me and it’s not based on research plus I am not making it up. Before you attack someone, why don’t you check your tv settings info with those gt7 settings on and see what the tv tells you. Sacrifices have to be made in order to achieve 120, my friend.
@fishLANGS if that's what YOUR tv info says, then it's more likely that your tv can't handle 120htz or you have the wrong HDMI cable (the supplied ps5 cable works fine) my LG CX runs it 120 at 4k just fine.
I'd be interested what the resolution set up is with resolution mode and 120hz maybe its a checkerboard 4K?
I read that its 1440p with AA..
Wouldn't take that as a confirmation though.
Im guessing digital foundry and some others will do a test.
There's definitely a pretty clear visual downgrade even in this mode. The lighting isn't as good/realistic and the reflective textures are way more diffused, there's slightly more pop in too. So I'd say it is worth a side by side for sure.
I use 120 mode for license tests but everything else I still prefer raytracing 60 mode, it looks so real, I'm constantly in awe.
I truly think you may need to make a video for those that use a LG CX,C1,G3, etc and use the gaming mode FPS counter and find that it either stays static at 59fps or 119fps. Never fluctuates and changes. Which is kinda strange. Are we set up wrong somewhere within one the devices?
Can you do,We Happy Few? A Dolby Vision and HDR settings.
Yes, 120hz performance looks much worse than 60hz. unfortunately on sony x90h when you use VRR local dimming is disabled so colors are not that great so I stick with 60hz.
I have the same TV. The resolution also suffered as well and I also found it has more motion blur. 60Hz is the best for this TV. I guess I need to upgrade this TV soon.
You have higher fps and it removes V sync so u get a lot better input response
So just to confirm are you sure 60hz is the same graphics and resolution as 120hz resolution raytracing mode?
There is a BIG difference in colour mapping or something. Once i enable the 120hz mode ingame the dark grey sections are light grey and all the colours are jist faded…
And i see this with more games. Like horizon zero dawn. The graphical modes are always way nicer, because its not only resolution, its colouring and deep blacks etc. Once u enable the 120hz modes on those games, blacks are not as pure, colours like blue and red are not as “bright” of clear, greys are foggy etc etc. Rather play 60fps with nice graphics then 120fps with lesser colours
Its almost like, hdr turns of when u do this
What monitor / TV do you use in the video ?
LG G2
I don't even own PS5 , still great video tho
You are most likely a broke pc player
Asus VG27BQ perfect?
Does it affect psvr2 version any way?
That's what I need to know to, I have the headset on 120hz, but in the game is it rt or performance mode.
is that lg tv? bcz i see the game ui on tv :D
No hdr settings in game anymore
Don't need it anyway
What hdr settings are you referring to?
The game copies the settings you did on your ps5 so hdr settings in the game is worthless.
@DoctorSilva Correct, it did this from release date on gt7. That's why im asking which hdr settings the first comment is referring too. I want to know if ive missed any other settings but im sure i haven't.
Amazing.
It's a shame that forza 5 is only 30 fps on high-quality mode
what the tv brand?
What picture settings are you using? they look amazing
Game Mode and a 2 point calibration
@@GamingTech-UA-cam Cool. Could you post your settings in the comments?
@@ryanbartlett9444 it's done through the service menu
@@GamingTech-UA-cam Do you have a video showing what you changed in the service menu?
@@ryanbartlett9444 no not for the G2. I will do this at some point
Much better 4k @ 60hz better fps , better video quality
Man what they do with ffb is amazing! My t300 on 4/2 driving Audi rs5 gr.2 is brutal, only problem is that after 30min motors are to hot… But anyway, I just can’t wait for console version of t818
No problem with a t-gt2!
Yoo wait 120 fps on race??????? 😱😱
Did anyone test PSVR2 before and after the 120hz patch? And??
I also would like to know this.
my opinion if can afford it new a tv that supports game optimiser for ps5 & series x so can see exactly wot any game running out this why buy a lg c2
Basically you're paying a few hundred extra dollars for 30 frames more from a native 4k 60Hz. The fact one can go from an indistinguishable difference of 120-90 shows frames aren't that big of a deal, just as how it already runs smoothly at 60 as stated. It's like paying for Nike when the unbranded shoes get you the same quality.
120fps mode is a big downgrade.
Resolution RT is the best
Any difference to the PSVR2 mode?
No change but psvr2 already had 120 FPS!
@@Racer_51 yes it does 😁, so does it matter if you run the game in RT mode or performance mode.
I don’t understand why anyone would play GT7 on a flat screen anymore so, while its a nice free improvement, it feels a bit of a “previous gen” improvement.
Picture quality and screen tech inside a VR headset still lags behind a 4K OLED screen. Plus, not everyone can play VR for longer sessions.
VR is the future but with its current limitations it should be complimentary to a screen (for now). Good thing switching between flat and VR in GT7 is seemless AF.
Well, most people don't have a VR headset. So upgrades to the flat screen version are welcome.
But you are right. After trying this game in VR, I don't think I'll ever play it flat-screen.
Sure, a TV looks better, but the immersion VR gives you, especially for games in a cockpit/driver seat, is much better.
@@exgeeinteractive picture quality in 2D now feels redundant (I have a 65” VFR OLED) as the benefits of 3D far outweigh everything. Back in the original Oculus Rift days I agree that quality was too poor (I loved Project Cars 2) but it’s now “good enough” and the cars are transformed beyond belief if you’ve never seen VR. I feel like I’m driving a car now and not playing a game on a TV. Add in a G Pro wheel and its a full workout lol. Appreciate not everyone can afford a VR headset and DD wheel but if you can afford an OLED TV… £$
@@sawdust8691 yeah I don’t mean to disrespect people without a VR headset and all improvements in gameplay are great for the community. It’s the UA-camrs I really feel sorry for as they currently have to stream in 2D to engage with their community while secretly playing in VR whenever else they can. We need headset streaming integration as well as third party apps like Sim Dashboard
@@markbooth Nahhh, picture quality is still far off, unless we're talking about a Pimax Crystal levels of resolution+screen+lenses.
Played GT7 on VR at launch with my rig (got mine in March 24th) and I believe everything that you said. But the PSVR2 is still a hard sale for many, prolly because of the price tag and launch library syndrome.
What TV is that?
The LG G2
S95b will make 60fps looks better than 120fps image quality and as smooth as the VRR 80 to 100 fps fluctuation that the game is showing up. Try it out it will smooth everything and clean up the downgrade in resolution. Turn off game mode and use the pitcture clarity mode on 10 blur reduction and 10 on judder.
How was the input lag? I think anything other than game mode would induce unplayable amount of input lag especially when you turn on the dejudder feature.
@@johnsonluk3468 it felt normal i had the same concern but really not noticeble
The Graphics are more than good on this game but the gameplay is stiff as hell also the sound of the cars are terrible!
I'm pretty sure this is off-topic... but as long as GT keeps ignoring collision damage, it will always be a "Hot Wheels" simulation to me, no matter the fps rate.
It literally has collision damage, what game are you playing??
It's not the gt7 makers, it's the car manufacturers that are licensed to be use in gt7, they will not allow bad damage.
@vyas rushi it's absolutely superficial. You can bounce at all the cars during all the race and finish it in one piece. It's only for visuals.
@@Rob-eg8qc I understand, but I don't care about which deal has been done between the company and car brands... as long as I have decent collision damage simulation.
@@eflobo it would make it more realistic, but it won't happen unfortunately.
The new Forza’s gonna whip its ass. Can’t wait till September.
I agree it looks amazing!
No it won't xbot
Count on it being delayed 😅
it will no different from the others. Fun for a bit then everyone will go online and get rammed into the first corner with no punishment to the offender on every race which causes anyone who takes racing games serious to stop playing and go back to better games like GT7, ACC and Iracing
Sure thing bud.
Gran Turismo > forza
Agree. I have Forza 7 & GT7. GT7 is the better game
The new Motorsport coming soon does look pretty freaking amazing, though.
Forza looks better...that's my only disappointment with Polyphony at the moment. Textures could be more photorealistic.
@@sawdust8691 Nah
@@youngsir3657 it doesn't
How tf you still get motion blur with the 120 hz mode😭
When i turn it on it just completely disable the motion blur effect
With your talent, i dont understand why u missplace information about fps and the build in game optimizer.😂 you do know its not a real fps counter ? It just shows the hrtz of the tv and your using boost mode to output the signal to 120hrtz😅
The 119 is the Hz of the signal strength. Doesn't mean you'll actually achieve 120fps ingame😂 Use fraps for real actual fps. Or digital foundry. Same as with god of war ragnerok. 120 fps mode actual ingame fps is between 80 and 90 and yes tested bij digital foundry. While lg shows 119 with the game optimizer ;)
You are wrong sorry. Within the vrr range Hz and FPS are the same. The game has a very stable 120fps mode and a 60fps+ mode . The game optimiser on the LG is showing the correct values here.
@@GamingTech-UA-cam I am not wrong, was waiting for you to say this. Check digital foundry god of war ragnerok review. The game max fps on 120 mode is between 80 and 90 fps. And the tv say 119 ;) So what u say now is that digital foundry is wrong 😂 but i am sure u wont replay back on this comment. Discussion closed.
@@darylkeam7670 That's just wrong. If you are in the VRR Range the number is correct. You can see it in my video: ua-cam.com/video/Cdg7AC8QQoE/v-deo.html . Not sure why this is so hard to understand?! What is the timestamp in the video from DF where I can see this? Link?
@@darylkeam7670 Have you checked DF video about GT7? Who is wrong now? Next time get you facts right before you are accusing someone of misplacing information.!
@@darylkeam7670 discussion is not closed until you watch the DF GT7 120 htz mode video. (Instead of watching the GoW video, which is a different game)
GT7 runs 120 fps
Definitely a visual downgrade in this mode, less but it's there
Sony is such greedy fools killing GT7 by not putting it on PC where it would shine at 144fps on a great rig. Imagine how nice it would be for the health of the Dev's to get an extra 100 million + in sales.
I now no longer support Sony in any of their business's. Vote with $$$ I bought a Sammy TV
Cry harder port beggar
Dirt Griggity 🤦🏼♂️🤡
Lol, so 90% of PC players can pirate it?? NO Thanks....they will only release it on PC once the GT7's PS5 version dies down in sales, maybe late 2024??? not anytime soon
Gt7 should stay only on Ps5. Pc brigade still have Richard burns rally.
Even this update, still it's graphics are worse than Forza's horizon 5.
Marcus, if you could have only 1 console, series x or PS5, which would you choose?
PS5 ! I like the first party title and I prefer the Edge Controller over the Elite
@@GamingTech-UA-cam Nice, thanks!!
The ps5 is basically a 2080ti for £480....... if that ain't a good deal I don't know what it.
Ya, the current consoles have some great bang for buck. More so than ever before.
I've considered going PC in the past. But I found I am satisfied with these consoles and can't really justify getting a PC to myself.
The consoles give a great game experience for so much cheaper.
@Sawdust I agree I was looking into pc before getting a series x ... im playing games at basically high to ultra settings at 60fps between 1440p/4k as I said there literally a 2080super/ ti witch still gives a great gameing experience.
@@lukemorris9066
Yep. And the console optimization makes up for a lot in the power gap between PC and Console.
If you want a PC experience that's better than a console, you need parts that are a lot more powerful and expensive.
And it seems PC has also been having a lot of problems lately. Games not being properly optimized, so even on the highest teir PC it runs like garbage while consoles do fine. That's the developers fault, but still.
I couldn't help but notice that Hogwarts ran fine on console while it stuttered its way through PC. And a lot of games do the same until they are fixed.
So while PC is the top dog for gaming, the consoles appeal to me more. Less problems, more bang for the buck, and overall deliver a good experience.
@Sawdust to have a clear jump over the current gen consoles you'd need a 3070 witch is a heavy buck and as you say games are hit and miss on pc witch isn't great seen as the money they cost ... as I said high to ultra settings at 60fps/4k/1440p is a seriously good gameing experience
Doesn't work in vr