Out with ONE INSTANT Pack Film | INSTANT FILM SHOOT
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 лис 2020
- Okay so I've covered the technical aspects of One Instant's new pack film, but how does it actually perform when we're outside with it?
- - - OneInstant PackFilm - - -
supersense.com/oneinstant/
- - - SUPPORT ANALOG RESURGENCE - - -
/ analogresurgence
- - - For New Analog Content Every Week - - -
SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL 🔔 ➡️ analog.watch/subscribe
- - - Super 8 & 16mm Camera, Film & Services Available at Pro8mm - - -
www.pro8mm.com?sca_ref=207073.rkNff54PoN
------------------------
SOCIAL MEDIA STUFF
/ noahender2000
/ analogresurge
------------------------
You can send me stuff for the videos!
Noah Henderson
PO BOX 99900 YG 434 149
RPO ELLERBECK
TORONTO, ON
M4K 0A2
For anyone who is curious, the big problem with the pods is well, that they're too big. You can see on the Fuji ones, or on integral film, they are smaller, and divided into sections. There was some discussion on this in a thread on photrio I started back in 2019. The idea is that you get multiple smaller wave fronts of reagent that join together, and move together, rather than having one big one that needs to be spread out all over. Thing is, its super hard to make a pod that will break with just the right amount of pressure, and to seal it in a way that the chemicals won't spoil.
I had a thought tonight while watching this and the other One Instant video to do pod production in a vacuum chamber- make the reagent gooey enough that it won't vaporize in a vacuum, and seal it so that when it comes under atmospheric pressure it collapses to its final size where it can be assembled into a film sandwich. Just an idea though, in case One Instant is watching!
I'm glad you're out here taking one for the team so I don't have to waste my money on this and can instead waste it on all of my other unforgivable film habits
Not really fare. Need to understand what this is and where they are in terms of capabilities. Watch this channel new video
This stuff has a long way to go
And they need us to help. Understanding what you are buying and the expectation will help you realize the value and order
@@Zetaphotography Thats not how it works. They dont get to fund their way into making an actual product by selling something that is this comicaly terrible. Quality needs to improve fast, otherwise this is dead in the water.
@@imvisier9925 especially while supplies last!!!
I'd love to see you try New 55 film
I can't see enough people investing in this to have it come back, as it stands. They need more R&D to either reduce cost from 10 Euros a shot, or improve the quality of the spread, colors, and pack.
Actually I'm kind of surprised you had these results. I've been using one instant and I've never had such over-exposure, maybe it's the low temperature... But yeah, they have a long way to go.
What's your link with the images. I'm going to order.
@@Zetaphotography If you follow the oneinstantfilm hashtag on Instagram there are loads of examples. instagram.com/explore/tags/oneinstantfilm/
The "T" handle mounted on the left side of the camera is there for a specific reason, even with original Polaroid pack film, the instructions were to "HOLD handle. Let camera hang: don't hold camera body. PULL tab all the way out of camera. Pull straight, medium fast, without stopping. Begin timing development."
Character Development: We get to hear Renee's voice
i love the energy of you guys and i really want this film
This was so frustrating to watch but I am grateful all the same. I hope it greatly improves
Need to buy it to watch it improve
@@Zetaphotography You toss your money down the drain if you want.
I've seen some insanely good results from creators who've shot it in studios but I'm guessing there's a lot of factors such as lighting, temperature, and the types of cameras used that affects the outcome of it.
What are the links to these studios
The colours are great. Spread, not so much. It reminds me of the Impossible Project...
Love your channel
keep it up
I bought some. I’ll give it a shot in my mini studio.
Fantastic stuff
Love it
They don't recycle black plastic in Massachusetts either because of black conveyor belts.
Pierre made it into my UA-cam feed before my dog made it to the store to see him
Blows me away that the one instant cost so much per photo when the success rate, and image quality is so low...
I’d love to see a video about pushing super 8 film. It’s hard to find a Super 8 camera that goes beyond 250 that isn’t expensive. I’m wondering how 500T would look on a camera that shoots at 250.
I cannot believe that you are not crossing paths all of the time with Kasey from Camera Conspiracies! His local walks are on the same paths and locations where you are in this video.
@Bender & Xing - Abel Adventures -- I keep waiting for Kasey to inadvertently show Noah in the background, or one of Noah's still photos to show Kasey in the background!
I kickstarted it and have my packs, but everything I see on YT scares me!!! I have use Polaroid stuff since 1970 ... this seems too bizarre, will use my packs, but not sure if i will be happy!!!
I'll buy them. Contact me
@@Zetaphotography Thanks for the offer, I will use them, but probably won't buy more until they get it more like traditional pack film.
I want to try it. I have the cool clip for the underarm development. I live in Florida too. Might like the warm weather ? If she had made a smooth pull I think your portrait would have done better
Oof - rough but neat to see when it works.
It seems the chemical spread is the toughest challenge. Hopefully they’ll be able improve the quality 🤞🏾
Yes it's better. Few years. Best to order one and then see it progress like stocks
Not ready for prime time! Good reviews.
I see there's zero blue in these photographs. Is the blue agent just expired or did it just not have a blue layer?
What would happen if you hit one of the prints with a squeegee before peeling it apart to make sure the chemicals spread evenly?
I get the feeling maybe you need the pull them out a bit slower than just full on yanking it out. Doing it a little slower should help let the chemicals spread properly. Or maybe it just depends. If it’s cooler outside maybe the chemicals are a tiny bit less liquid and not flowing as well as if it’s warmer out.
I experimented with it in different settings and pulling at different speeds in different cameras, but was consistently getting results like the ones seen here.
@@AnalogResurgence Seems like they got better towards the end. I looked up other peoples results and they seem to get similar to the worser ones and some like the better ones.
There's such a big difference between your results and those from Ben from InAnInstant, who also shot one shot today and has such vibrant colors
I’ve seen Ben get some great results! This stuff seems to be very very inconsistent.
Also I look forward to Ben’s take on it as well! I understand there’s different levels of interest in it and different results to be had.
@@AnalogResurgence anyway to track down batches. Like which one is newer, older, what has been tweaked.
@@Zetaphotography I don't think it makes a big difference. My results were from different batches in July and in August. Apart from finding people selling stuff that they bought from months ago, you're going to get the most recent stuff when you buy from them.
i tried it too
it brought back memorys of the good old days..... before Fujis betrayal
Has a rustic sepia look
Love the colours. Doesn't seem too reliable though.
Treat it like expired film and just enjoy the magic
I order two 3 packs myself, so far I have only tried 1 shot in my 600se. It came out totally overexposed with whiteish yellow tone.
Did you see temperature have an affect? It was 80-85f and bright light but shadows in the details veterans memorial was photographing
Cool. Good you purchased
Im Waiting for a Sale or something
They can be cute for art shots.
Can you make video of how to scanning 8m film into digital or, 4K resolution with out hand in to the stores?
I'm very interested in tackling home scanning in the future! The problem is that it's very expensive, difficult, and in the end the results that you can get from a lab will almost always be better. 4K scanning at home isn't something that’s easily done.
So, what is the future One Instant? Are they currently working on the issues that seem to be common with every UA-camr that has tested their film? What happens when the old Polaroid stock runs out? Are they developing new film that they will actually manufacture?
That’s something I tried to tackle more in the detailed video posted yesterday about OneInstant. Fixing these issues would require new sized chemical pods which is a challenge to make without machines, and new film would likely only be viable in the form of black and white. Something they will probably pursue in the near future.
@@AnalogResurgence waiting for that Kickstarter. Hoping to not sell my RB67 before then
But I do have my Polaroid Landcamera 450
I Got 2 packs (Black and white variation) of this stuff a while ago and have been storing it in the fridge. My only question which I can't find the answer anywhere including the one instant website is which exposure setting to use when I put this film in one of my land cameras which only has 75 (color) or 3000 (B&W) as the exposure options. I would assume the 3000 but since this isn't the standard Fuji or Polaroid peel apart film I want to be sure before I potentially waste a shot. Any ideas?
The black and white film they have is a 400iso film. So neither the 75iso setting or the 3000iso setting are going to be correct. Instead it's best meant for pack-film cameras that allow for manual control over the exposure. Shooting this film with the 3000 setting will result in very very dark images. Using it with the 75iso setting will result in very bright images. If your camera has a dial (often beside the lens) that makes the image brighter or darker, you could try turning this all the way to the darken side and set the camera on the 75 setting. It may still come out over-exposed though.
Oh brilliant. Yeah I was getting a bit annoyed not having that info right on their website and even in the demo videos they post they use a regular land camera I believe so I was confused why I couldn’t find that info. My cameras do have that dial so I will start with exposing at 75 with the dial turned down. Thanks so much! Love your channel!
Interesting concept. I’d love to shoot these types of instant films someday, but right now it just does not seem feasible
You are the reincarnation of a younger Edwin Land -- or really one of his lab technicians -- trying to develop and perfect pack film 60 years ago!!!
Haha I just shoot it!
@@AnalogResurgence -- OK. OK -- so you are one of the guinea pig -- uh, beta testers from 60 years ago!!!! :-)
I think the paper needs to be thicker to apply more pressure between the rollers.
I’m not sure that would do it. The prints from the one Instant stuff already feel thicker than normal pack film.
How cold was it during the shoot? I imagine that would have a major impact on development.
Cool but not unreasonably cold. Also all the OneInstant shots were protected immediately after development in a Polaroid Cold Clip which is a warmed metal clip that further helps developing.
Just a thought, is it possible that having ordered this film from Europe that it likely went through Airport X-Rays which could have had some negative effects on the film? Clearly that isn't responsible for all the issues, but just a thought.
It’s possible, but a lot of the issues here seem to come from the issues with the pods, the packaging that’s prone to light leaks, and just the fact that it’s being made by hand with what’s available.
I got some b&w 667 film that expired in 1983 and I'm really scared to use it
You’ll never know until you do let us know how it goes!!
Can you do anything to help spread the chemicals once the film is out of the camera?
Not really, the rollers in the camera migrate the chemicals to the end of the film as it’s pulled. Seems what’s spread is spread once it’s out.
@@AnalogResurgence can we hit it with a squeegee lol
Music?
I just simply don't think its worth it. Although I get what they're trying to do, I just don't see this working in the long run. But I also am not gonna blame them or fuji for it dying out. I always see people mad at fuji for discontinuing it. But everyone needs to understand that fuji is a company that needs to make a profit on what they are selling and by the time this was discontinued, the market for peel apart film was practically gone. Fuji didn't betray anyone or anything like that, they continued for as long as they could but eventually they weren't making anything from it anymore.
Thank you for making this video! And also thank you for taking the financial hit of making this video. Now I'm fully convinced I don't need to waste my money on this film. At least until it becomes more reliable and solid. It's so sad because I miss shooting with my polaroid land so much!
I’m just here for the Pierre cameo.
I’ve been curious about the progress on these. I still have a few dozen packs of fp100 and fp3000. I did some portrait shoots w/ a Big Shot and used a couple of packs a week ago. The packs are expired but I still knew what I was going to get. These don’t even come remotely close.
Hmm, "Wet Plate 'Instant" film pack. As for the little kid's question, "Why can't I see the pictures right now?" The answer is: "Life takes time. Get used to it.";) It's also messy, uneven, and unreliable as well. One Instant Pack Film: "It's (sorta) OK"
Nice old time look color, but developer spread issue is a problem, Impossible early films were just as bad hopefully they get some backing will out losing Control
😅 oh
3:18 i think u hurt the camera
Camera was fine. The film hurt me.
I think they need to bring Polaroid in on this,, the pods are off,,, the negative is obviously expired long ago,, why not use spectra pods and negative that is fresh from Polaroid? I would love to try this,, but I’m not even considering it ,, at this stage....it’s just not ready for market,,, you guys were so happy to be using it,, until ya peeled it,,, every shot,, was a disappointment....
@@ilmago5291 yup,,, also for ten bucks ,, ya should get at least one perfect shot,,,
I think you have an obsession to instant film LOL
I’ve an obsession to all film
@@AnalogResurgence please keep obsessing!
I know the one instant team is really trying hard, but it seems that this film lacks in quality control.
There is no but. Understand the expectations.
this seems very not worth it. i'll take my chances on ebay
Don’t shake it
It's unfortunate to see that one instant is charging a premium price for a product that I personally wouldn't consider ready to launch. I would love to use my pack film camera, but unfortunately at the price they're charging it isn't worth it. I would much rather continue working on figuring out a way to use polaroid sx-70 film in my pack film camera instead.
I don’t understand people getting mad at one instant. They don’t owe anyone anything, and they’re better than nothing, just get over it
I think the only way to save pack film is for fans to troll Fujifilm until they pass on their knowledge to One Instant. Right now, they are basically selling expired film at a premium rate because Fujifilm refuses to help. While their efforts are admirable, the results are far from it. I'd be pissed if someone gifted me a pack of this, even for free, it doesn't seem worth it.
Have you seen the price of Portra VC, NC, VPS, 220 and Ektachrome VS.
Nice video but you have convinced me to keep hoarding FP100C. Even 10 years old it works better than this stuff.
It looks like the chemicals are already dead.
I dont think it's worth it ,I watch several videos ,with not even one decent shot, and I get like yeah yeah they trying to keep the romance alive etc etc, but I really think that if you going to charge this prices I expect at least my half shots to be at least decent. Not to mention all this waste that I hope if people will continue do it for the romance of it to keep a little bit romance for our planet and recycle everything that comes out from this type of photography
So it seems like it’s garbage lol
From what I have seen so far of this One Instant stuff, it seems like absolute garbage. I'd be disappointed in the results if I was only paying $1 per shot, but at the real price of 10 times as much I think I'd rather just burn $10 bills. It's a better use of the money. The bar they're trying to reach is so very low. Instant photography has always been just terrible. It's a fantastic idea on paper, sure, but so is communism. Like communism, though, instant photography in practice is just a terrible idea. It was terrible back when it was the only option for instant prints, and now that we have many other much better options available, it falls very firmly into the why bother category for me. Do the decent thing and let this form of instant photography die.
My conclusion: not worth the money...
Neither was reading this comment
Just horrible
That film type was great but it is truly dead. Don’t go wasting your money on it. Buy negative film instead!!! 😹
To you it might be a waste of money, but to others they might see potential, both as it is now, an for what might come in the future. The fact that this exists at all gives me hope for the future of the format
Slide Film, New 55 PN100 and One Instant get my money
This stuff is trash. Nothing beats FP100C