World Trade Center Tower 2 Litigation Animations

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2023
  • These animated reconstructions of the impacts and collapses of the World Trade Center towers were originally created for a 2004 litigation. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) data generated by the investigating engineers was used by IMS | Z-Axis to create the only technically accurate visualization of the sequence of events.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 119

  • @OQ0_2random
    @OQ0_2random 9 місяців тому +12

    this video is underrated ngl

  • @rhyfelwrDuw
    @rhyfelwrDuw 9 місяців тому +19

    It's scary that the nutters flying the plane could see their imminent deaths, yet I expect they didn't even flinch! The poor people on the plane!

    • @JD-wn3cc
      @JD-wn3cc 9 місяців тому +11

      In the fanatical version of their religion, they believe they will go to their heaven forever and be given, amongst other things, 20 virgins.

    • @aerisgainsborough2141
      @aerisgainsborough2141 9 місяців тому

      and when they get there, it's full of mormons...see you in hell terrorists!!!

    • @empireofsrivijaya1084
      @empireofsrivijaya1084 8 місяців тому

      ​​@@JD-wn3ccthat's fake doctrine.Qur'an or hadist never say that people who do terror will go to heaven.The terrorists misinterpret verses from the Qur'an even though the actual meaning is not like that.

    • @Dec38105
      @Dec38105 8 місяців тому +6

      @@JD-wn3cc they're told that by someone who's never been

    • @daniko4447
      @daniko4447 8 місяців тому

      ​@@JD-wn3ccMmhhhhh 20 virgins 😋😋😋😋

  • @chaycooper5923
    @chaycooper5923 9 місяців тому +15

    Some of the better animations ive seen. At least it shows the plane going through the cheese grater. Nothing in this video is contested, however, unfortunately the simulation stops at the good part. I want to see what happens during the collapse. Does the sim have the building collapse directly downwards at freefall? Or does it do something else? Why does the video stop here?

    • @stevetilbrook3402
      @stevetilbrook3402 8 місяців тому

      The video stops at collapse initiation because the National institute of Science and Technology, have no believable explanation for a vertical collapse at 56 mph leaving nothing standing , so rather than try and look like total BS artists they stood on this less stinky BS and trusted in American ignorance.

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 8 місяців тому

      None of the buildings collapsed directly downwards, and none fell at free fall speed.
      Get help.

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 8 місяців тому

      ​@@stevetilbrook3402 except the cores of both buildings WERE briefly still standing completely disproving your conspiracy

    • @cwrighta70
      @cwrighta70 8 місяців тому

      ​@@slooob23this is exactly right. Multiple videos show in the midst of the smoke/dust cloud that large, tall sections of the core remained standing briefly. Not to mention the buildings didn't fall "straight down". Their collapses fell outward considerably, but scale is a difficult thing for the brain to understand sometimes. For example, as the south tower fell, about halfway through the collapse a massive section of outer wall was pushed outward through the smoke.

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 8 місяців тому

      @@cwrighta70 yep, it is unbelievable that these people hold to such utterly insane theories considering all the video evidence proving them wrong.

  • @misterfunnybones
    @misterfunnybones 8 місяців тому

    The significant mass of the engines & landing gear are lost in this video. F=MA.

  • @Eye_Exist
    @Eye_Exist 8 місяців тому +5

    animations are so cool because you can make even solid steel beams behave like they weren't even physical objects. and majority of people being dumb as little children they won't be able tell any difference and believe it without a question.

    • @jamesmiller5331
      @jamesmiller5331 8 місяців тому +2

      Anything that supports what I *want* to believe I will go with. Anything that supports what I *don't want* to believe is complete bullshit and only a sheep would believe it.
      Amirite?

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 8 місяців тому +2

      What is really dumb is excluding kinetic energy as if it isn't even a real thing. 🤔

    • @cwrighta70
      @cwrighta70 8 місяців тому +1

      BOOOOO

    • @Eye_Exist
      @Eye_Exist 5 місяців тому +1

      @@slooob23 worse is forgetting that the entire bottom towers were fully intact and thus should have absorbed the kinetic energy slowing and eventually stopping the falling but instead gave away as if they weren't even there.

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 5 місяців тому +2

      @@Eye_Exist lol, there wasn't "anything there" to arrest the collapse once it started. There was literally nothing between the core and the outer columns that could have absorbed the energy and slowed the collapse. Tube structure design flaw.

  • @stevetilbrook3402
    @stevetilbrook3402 9 місяців тому +18

    Well you can see the core was only slightly damaged then an hour later the building dropped like stone and turned to powdered rubble?

    • @fredjones7705
      @fredjones7705 9 місяців тому +20

      Each tower had 110 floors. The floors measured 209 feet on a side. Each floor had a 4 inch pour of concrete on a 1/8th inch steel plate which was supported by a truss system.
      So the concrete alone in each tower measured 209 feet X 209 feet X 36 feet. This should explain the rubble...even to a truther.

    • @stevetilbrook3402
      @stevetilbrook3402 9 місяців тому

      @@fredjones7705 The whole building was made of concrete in your poor shriveled mind... OK good luck with the engineering degree,,, and If you think rattling of a few dimensions takes the stink off your BS ,,, it dont Bro,,,,,, it dont .

    • @jamesa1995
      @jamesa1995 9 місяців тому +16

      there are other videos that explain it very well. The floor trusses are what pulled this building down. They essentially sagged due to the heat (the steel weakened it didnt melt) and therefore dented the steel frame (pulled the outer frame inwards), the weight at the top was simply too much for the core to hold up.

    • @stevetilbrook3402
      @stevetilbrook3402 9 місяців тому

      @@jamesa1995 Uneven damage and uneven heat somehow results in a perfectly timed neat as can be, absolutely symmetrical collapse, straight down at free fall speed with a hundred thousand tons of high grade steel, 225,000 cubic feet of concrete and 16 miles of elevator shafts and cars disintegrating to dust before Americas eyes and its bought without question. 😅Infact our slack jawed Simpson mindset claims anyone who doesn't accept that is a conspiracy nut & a wacko.. THAT'S FUNNY !

    • @Spector06111
      @Spector06111 9 місяців тому +23

      “But steel fuel cant melt jet beams. So muzztt be contwollled demolitonnns because it fell at near light speed “ typical truther comment. 😅

  • @jeffeverett274
    @jeffeverett274 8 місяців тому +1

    I still 2:55 2:55 think 2:55 it was an inside job.

  • @nismo370z4
    @nismo370z4 8 місяців тому +5

    767 can not reach 550 mph at such a low altitude. This was brought up by engineers and confirmed by boeing.
    The video of 911 that showed the airplane engine lying in the street was also proven not to be the engine make or model used on a 767.
    Do some research for yourself !

    • @thelilpeanutdotgov
      @thelilpeanutdotgov 8 місяців тому

      cry about it 🤡🤡

    • @jamesmiller5331
      @jamesmiller5331 8 місяців тому +1

      Anything that supports what I *want* to believe I will go with. Anything that supports what I *don't want* to believe is complete bullshit and only a sheep would believe it.
      Amirite?

    • @slooob23
      @slooob23 8 місяців тому +7

      And yet it did reach 550mph. Do you think the terrorists were worried about damaging the plane by not observing boeings operation envelope?😂😂😂 bless your heart.

    • @thelilpeanutdotgov
      @thelilpeanutdotgov 8 місяців тому

      @@slooob23 bb- b- but- but- no!!1!1!1 it- it’s impoosibele!!!1 1!1! th- the 767 can’t do that!l!!! it goe- g- it goes against my conspiracies!!1!1!1!1! it’s all fake!!1!1!!!1!1!! 😡😡😡

    • @cwrighta70
      @cwrighta70 8 місяців тому +4

      Yes, it did reach 550mph. Also, multiple angles show that the plane descended pretty rapidly before taking aim at the tower. Easy way to increase ground speed...add gravity to the equation.

  • @seanbonella
    @seanbonella 8 місяців тому

    It was demolished....ssy what ye want it was pulled down

  • @Backflip789
    @Backflip789 8 місяців тому

    some eyewitnesses said it was a missle not an airplane

    • @Milchreismitschoko2
      @Milchreismitschoko2 8 місяців тому +14

      But every person that isn’t blind as them saw an airplane.

    • @daniko4447
      @daniko4447 8 місяців тому +1

      Ofc. They only saw the front view of the fuselage, it was too fast

    • @misterfunnybones
      @misterfunnybones 8 місяців тому +8

      "Some" eyewitnesses said it was a bird? What's your point?

    • @iowanation1034
      @iowanation1034 8 місяців тому +4

      Then, where's the plane and all the passengers?

    • @Backflip789
      @Backflip789 8 місяців тому

      @@iowanation1034 one can only speculate here. it is possible that the so-called hijacked planes made an emergency landing and the passengers were killed.