Відео

There’s already a ton of collapse simulations

Nvm i found it

@@coolasmr4498 what was it?

@@29fucksgiven i forgot , but i think you can find it in a compilation of flight 175 impact

Shouldnt be too hard

@@coolasmr4498 thanks m8

​@xX_H347H3R_Xx not only that, the towers were very much unique in their design, using the open floor plan. So when they got hit much of their structural integrity was out right destroyed. Leading to heavy sag of the impact floors, which ultimately gave out causing the infamous chain reaction of one floor after another giving way to the above

Was it hit by an airliner fully loaded with fuel traveling 450+ mph?

@davidhepburn9328 Did you sleep through physics class?

The Grenfell tower was a concrete structure while the Trade Centers were steel framed buildings, you just can't compare the two and if you do that means you know nothing about the matter.

​@@kanash8851false. Even the official investigation by NIST ruled out a pancake collapse, which is what you're describing. Do you have eyes? They didn't collapse, they turned into dust

Anything that supports what I *want* to believe I will go with. Anything that supports what I *don't want* to believe is complete bullshit and only a sheep would believe it. Amirite?

What is really dumb is excluding kinetic energy as if it isn't even a real thing. 🤔

BOOOOO

@@slooob23 worse is forgetting that the entire bottom towers were fully intact and thus should have absorbed the kinetic energy slowing and eventually stopping the falling but instead gave away as if they weren't even there.

@@Eye_Exist lol, there wasn't "anything there" to arrest the collapse once it started. There was literally nothing between the core and the outer columns that could have absorbed the energy and slowed the collapse. Tube structure design flaw.

cry about it 🤡🤡

Anything that supports what I *want* to believe I will go with. Anything that supports what I *don't want* to believe is complete bullshit and only a sheep would believe it. Amirite?

And yet it did reach 550mph. Do you think the terrorists were worried about damaging the plane by not observing boeings operation envelope?😂😂😂 bless your heart.

@@slooob23 bb- b- but- but- no!!1!1!1 it- it’s impoosibele!!!1 1!1! th- the 767 can’t do that!l!!! it goe- g- it goes against my conspiracies!!1!1!1!1! it’s all fake!!1!1!!!1!1!! 😡😡😡

Yes, it did reach 550mph. Also, multiple angles show that the plane descended pretty rapidly before taking aim at the tower. Easy way to increase ground speed...add gravity to the equation.

But every person that isn’t blind as them saw an airplane.

Ofc. They only saw the front view of the fuselage, it was too fast

"Some" eyewitnesses said it was a bird? What's your point?

@@iowanation1034 one can only speculate here. it is possible that the so-called hijacked planes made an emergency landing and the passengers were killed.

some "eyewitnesses" also say the earth is flat 🤡

@@chedderman101 Hello? It was still standing after the explosions, both of the towers.

​@@UNMALVADOHATER1334 If you really only want to not understand...No, that is not correct. I even didn't say I have directly seen the nose of the plane coming out. I said it looked like it because obviously it was obscured by explosions. The first thing from the other side looked like being the nose in the event of the explosion.

@@cskandrsgyrgy 🤦🏻‍♂️ Really? I guess you could also said the heat tiles did its job on the Columbia Shuttle on the day it blew up on re-entry too? It’s only one small hole in the heat shield of the Columbia… what can go wrong?🤷🏻‍♂️ If a piece of metal is burning… either there are fire resistance covering 100% of its entire surface or else it’s 100% useless… just like Space shuttle Columbia. Fire resistance coating that’s fallen off is just as useful as trying to putout the fire using your farts…

What is steel fuel? Please try again with this absurd comment. By the way, it was mentioned in comments that steel wouldn’t melt, nobody actually said it was steel melting. Just people theorising at the time, which idiots then believed it to be true.

@@AnitaDil bro steel fuel is not melt beam jets

It was either 400 knots or 500 knots

496 mph for Flight 11, 560 mph for Flight 175

​@@salamisumo2 it was UA 175 not AA 175

@@salamisumo2 what abt pentagon

10 knots

That was concrete that turned to dust, the core ended up in the pile of rubble

@@AnitaDil OK tell me how it happened.

Each tower had 110 floors. The floors measured 209 feet on a side. Each floor had a 4 inch pour of concrete on a 1/8th inch steel plate which was supported by a truss system. So the concrete alone in each tower measured 209 feet X 209 feet X 36 feet. This should explain the rubble...even to a truther.

@@fredjones7705 The whole building was made of concrete in your poor shriveled mind... OK good luck with the engineering degree,,, and If you think rattling of a few dimensions takes the stink off your BS ,,, it dont Bro,,,,,, it dont .

there are other videos that explain it very well. The floor trusses are what pulled this building down. They essentially sagged due to the heat (the steel weakened it didnt melt) and therefore dented the steel frame (pulled the outer frame inwards), the weight at the top was simply too much for the core to hold up.

@@jamesa1995 Uneven damage and uneven heat somehow results in a perfectly timed neat as can be, absolutely symmetrical collapse, straight down at free fall speed with a hundred thousand tons of high grade steel, 225,000 cubic feet of concrete and 16 miles of elevator shafts and cars disintegrating to dust before Americas eyes and its bought without question. 😅Infact our slack jawed Simpson mindset claims anyone who doesn't accept that is a conspiracy nut & a wacko.. THAT'S FUNNY !

“But steel fuel cant melt jet beams. So muzztt be contwollled demolitonnns because it fell at near light speed “ typical truther comment. 😅

The video stops at collapse initiation because the National institute of Science and Technology, have no believable explanation for a vertical collapse at 56 mph leaving nothing standing , so rather than try and look like total BS artists they stood on this less stinky BS and trusted in American ignorance.

None of the buildings collapsed directly downwards, and none fell at free fall speed. Get help.

​@@stevetilbrook3402 except the cores of both buildings WERE briefly still standing completely disproving your conspiracy

​@@slooob23this is exactly right. Multiple videos show in the midst of the smoke/dust cloud that large, tall sections of the core remained standing briefly. Not to mention the buildings didn't fall "straight down". Their collapses fell outward considerably, but scale is a difficult thing for the brain to understand sometimes. For example, as the south tower fell, about halfway through the collapse a massive section of outer wall was pushed outward through the smoke.

@@cwrighta70 yep, it is unbelievable that these people hold to such utterly insane theories considering all the video evidence proving them wrong.

not bot btw

​​@@JD-wn3ccthat's fake doctrine.Qur'an or hadist never say that people who do terror will go to heaven.The terrorists misinterpret verses from the Qur'an even though the actual meaning is not like that.

@@JD-wn3cc they're told that by someone who's never been

There is a second footage of the first plane. A sightseeing video of the towers from a distance.

There's a video from Pavel Hlava, capturing the explosion from a highway, Wolfgang Staehle Footage ( video on my profile ) and the one you mentioned, theres also multiple that caught the sound of the explosion, one from the WABC news camera, one from the one liberty plaza, one from a wire tap on agent Stephen McCardle in World Trade Center 3.

There are several news cameras pointing at the WTC at 8:00 am, just 45 minutes before the attack. It should've caught the first plane, but so far there are no footage from news cameras.

also that shot from the car on the freeway...

@@adalfezi It's just gausian distribution. Even a twoofer can't make much out of that.

@MrGriff305 Probably just your opinion, out of the 11 thousand people who have seen this. Also, "love" is a common compliment.

Glad it was helpful!