Amazing to see this. It's like Paul is sitting in your living room, talking with you. Such a self-effacing, gracious man. We love you Paul forever and ever.
Paul looks fine for an 81-year-old man who has led a busy and fascinating life. We all should look so good at that age. And frankly, he probably doesn't care at this point, nor should he.
Everyone in the comments saying "he's not young - he's in his 40s" etc? Look at him/listen to him here! Paul McCartney at 42 was young. 39 here, and Paul at 42 was younger than me at 39.
Stating a “young Paul McCartney” would have to be younger than his Beatlemania days to justify saying “young” since plenty of interviews in his 20’s are readily available to watch
@NaaHva He is still alive. Those of you who believe the gossip in the USA from 1966 that he died are daft, he had a minor car accident. You can read the truth on Wikipedia or hear him talk about it with James Corden on Carpool Karaoke. Us in the UK & most countries/islands of the world know he’s still alive, we’ve never believed gossip. Also, how can someone be the spitting image of him, sound like him when singing & talking, also play guitar left handed?
What's all this commenting on Sir Paul's age. Sir Paul lived and accomplished infinitely more than all you ageists ever will before he even turned 21, and certainly has given us so much more to help make life on this planet so much more enjoyable. All you need is love all you millennials and baby Gen Z'ers!
What a genius performer...and Paul's not too shabby his own self. But seriously, Tracy is the best actress I've ever seen when it involves her transforming herself into other celebrities, politicians, and public figures of any kind.
Paul McCartney has been famous since he was like 21.. This isn't at all considered "young Paul McCartney" by actual fans. Also nothing rare about this. Paul McCartney is possibly one of the most interviewed people of all time.
My thinking is John was brilliant. But he would never of achieved so much without Paul. Paul was the backbone of the Beatles lets say McCartney always has last say.
No, not nonsense. If any of the non-believers out there cared to do research, there is enough evidence to support that the real James Paul McCartney passed away in September 1966. It is not a conspiracy theory. People need to stop living in la la land and wake up.
This can be rare because when Paul comes to the United States he is considered us Prime and what is so neat is that he is a vegetarian. No meat ! How can that be ...
Yes - this is definitely Billy Shepherd (William). James Paul McCartney had a very special charming face, that would never be able to age. If Paul had lived to his 40's he would still look like he did in 1964. He wouldn't look like he was 40. Never. Here, William clearly looks middle-aged.
Is it supposed to be fun living in an alternate reality, just making up random junk? Form of entertainment or something? Is yours the one where Elvis and Tupac are still above ground too?
@@ThamiumOne You know better what it's like to live in an alternate reality. In the real world Paul died in 1966 and was replaced by Billy. This is the truth. 100%
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney - You know what your tone reminds me of? I just realized this, and it's striking. Ever seen the Charlie Brown Halloween special? It's the one where Linus sits camped out in the pumpkin patch, seriously insisting that a figure he calls the "Great Pumpkin" is about to rise up any moment and toss candy out to everyone. He does this year, after year, after year... "He's coming this time! You'll see!!" And guess what? It NEVER happens. Not once. Everyone tries to tell him this is all in his imagination, but he simply doesn't get it. This also reminds me of the extremely poor track record of tons of other conspiracy stories. People were convinced that Kate Middleton was dead. Turns out she isn't . People insisting for the last 40 years that Elvis Presley was alive and it would be revealed "soon". He's never shown up, probably for a very good reason, since being buried inside of a concrete slab for a few decades tends to limit one's mobility. Honestly -- think about how many of these ideas have never wound up being real. You have to admit, it's a pretty pathetic track record. You know what might be refreshing once in a while? Maybe if you or someone else who says things like this would say : "Here's what I personally believe, but there's always the chance I could be wrong about it". For some reason, we rarely hear that.
This man ain't Paul McCartney!! Paul had a very special face that would not be able to look old. If James Paul McCartney had lived to the 1980's he would look EXACTLY the same as he did in 1964. He wouldn't look like he was 40. Never.
He was such a handsome young guy.
Good God, he was beautiful then, wasn't he? And still is. Smart, funny, wickedly talented. The gods smiled on him. Live forever, Paul, never leave us.
He now looks like an old woman!!!
He is amazing. I fell in love with him when I was 5 years old. And I'm still in my 40's...
His talent, his personality, the face, the eyes... ❤❤❤
McCartney the genius, wit, human being. My god when he goes the world will cry its eyes out.
You know it!
I was just thinking that a couple of weeks ago, it took a very long time for me to get over John.
I won't
Oh yes...I think about that too. What a talented man & with such humility.
I'll be one of them crying my eyes out.
Amazing to see this. It's like Paul is sitting in your living room, talking with you. Such a self-effacing, gracious man. We love you Paul forever and ever.
Paul looks very good,like always!!!
William doesn't look good.
The Musical God who has given the world so much. If music is the food of love, we have feasted on the great man’s songs.
From a fellow scouser raised not far from where Paul was from I really love seeing him in these old clips.
Biological Paul, or Billy ?
@@mullhollandmace7271Is this the Paul is dead theory or something else? 😂
@@doofusboy7054 Not a theory. The truth.
@@NaaHva Delulu
@@aldam10 Do some research.
just a great human being as well as a musical genius
Phil Collins would disagree.
He was about 42 in this interview. Back then turning 40 was a big deal. But look at him now he probably wishes he could travel back to 1984.
I bet you wish that too
Yea he looks dead
@@steffanhoffmannMorto esta sua mente
Don't we all wish we could do that well I do anyway
Paul looks fine for an 81-year-old man who has led a busy and fascinating life. We all should look so good at that age. And frankly, he probably doesn't care at this point, nor should he.
Paul McCartney is a complete performer and funny as
funny? Na
Billy is veru arrogant. The real Paul McCartney would never be like that. Never.
So gorgeous. No wonder he was the favorite beatle❤
When I was 64 - the Beatles released their last single, Now and Then. True story. My birthdate is Nov 2nd 1959. 🙂
1000 lessons in 8 minutes, thank you paul.
I loved those 4 lads.
You love the music. But do they love you back. Remember you don't know these guys are even met them. You love the music.
@@waynejohanson1083 DORK.
Why?
@@waynejohanson1083 they were great people I'd say except from John, but even he's nice on the outside. especially
@@kenmcglown6642 He was not one of the four lads.
Paul and Tracy play off one another so well.
Paul was my first love. Consequently, if I meet a man with his eyes, I fall in love instantly.
I’ve seen very few interviews of Paul, this was the best I’ve seen. Enjoyed.
Everyone in the comments saying "he's not young - he's in his 40s" etc? Look at him/listen to him here! Paul McCartney at 42 was young. 39 here, and Paul at 42 was younger than me at 39.
Tell someone who gives a frig.
@@Jimbo-90 😆
@@Jimbo-90I give a frig 😂
Thought he died last year?????
Stating a “young Paul McCartney” would have to be younger than his Beatlemania days to justify saying “young” since plenty of interviews in his 20’s are readily available to watch
But he always does in anything. He's a genious
Une interviews avec une excellente résolution graphique de Paul McCartney lorsqu'il était jeune. Plutôt rare de voir cela.
Charming!
Not Billy.
The real J.P.M. (1942-1966) was very charming.
he's such a good-looking man .
The real James Paul McCartney would have been more beautiful in his 40's.
@NaaHva He is still alive. Those of you who believe the gossip in the USA from 1966 that he died are daft, he had a minor car accident. You can read the truth on Wikipedia or hear him talk about it with James Corden on Carpool Karaoke. Us in the UK & most countries/islands of the world know he’s still alive, we’ve never believed gossip. Also, how can someone be the spitting image of him, sound like him when singing & talking, also play guitar left handed?
Paul and Tracy 😊❤❤
Paul like Cliff Richard managed to look 10 years younger than they were in the 1970's and 80's
What's all this commenting on Sir Paul's age. Sir Paul lived and accomplished infinitely more than all you ageists ever will before he even turned 21, and certainly has given us so much more to help make life on this planet so much more enjoyable. All you need is love all you millennials and baby Gen Z'ers!
What?
blud is losing it
@@goodester6924 Lost it 🤣
So well said 👏! 👍
I got to kiss Tracy Ulman SIX times in a scene on her T.V. show! "So, what?!!!" you say? Hey, Sir Paul only did ONCE!!!
Paul McCartney es eterno!!!!! Debería serlo 😢
There's about 10 zillion Paul McCartney interviews on you tube. So how is this "rare"? And he's in his 40s here so he's not young either.
I'm now 65 years old so anyone in their 40's qualities as young for me 😁
@@robertmartinez4174 Hate to break it to you but 40s is not young, it's middle aged.
40s is young bruh change yiur mindset
@@ractmo you won't think like that when you're 65 .
@@ractmo Change my mindset? Learn your math facts.
What a genius performer...and Paul's not too shabby his own self. But seriously, Tracy is the best actress I've ever seen when it involves her transforming herself into other celebrities, politicians, and public figures of any kind.
Paul never got old ...
He's geriatric now.
Get real
That's right, because he sadly passed over in 1966.
@@annettekenning8326when you become a musician or gain a teeny bit of musical ability then we can chat
@annettekenning8326 No he didn’t, he is still alive. Stop believing gossip made 58 years ago.
Paul McCartney has been famous since he was like 21.. This isn't at all considered "young Paul McCartney" by actual fans. Also nothing rare about this. Paul McCartney is possibly one of the most interviewed people of all time.
Paul McCartney Music Music ⭐️⭐️
He still looked like a Beatle,
Very Interesting. Is there the rest of this appearance?
Love seeing Ms. Ullman as well.
I noticed John Lennon popped in at the end, smiling! 😊
4:56 Ironically, Tracey Ullman is now 64. Time waits for no man. Or woman ;)
FFS - a young McCartney would've been in 1963!!
I believe he's in his early 40's here.
That cut off too quickly. I was just getting into that, especially when he was talking about Buddy Holly.
Michael Aspel is actually still alive to this day. Wow.
If Dylan got a Nobel prize then McCartney should get two.
The cute beatle ❤
William didn't like to be called "The cute Beatle".
"Young" - the guy is in his 40s here.
Is it me or is Tracey looking rather hot here...
Sir Paul for Nobel Peace Prize. ❤
The interviewer has a rug on. 😂
No he doesn't. Aspel just had a weird 70s way of styling his hair.
My thinking is John was brilliant. But he would never of achieved so much without Paul. Paul was the backbone of the Beatles lets say McCartney always has last say.
Such an interesting point. Say more.
I have seen this 10 times
Glutton for punishment then 😂
@@steffanhoffmann no, just saying it isn't rare. It's Paul. It's fabulous 👌
It's about to seen again, as they ask you to focus on....
The norm was to be thin and fit in those days…
Yes the norm was thin up until about the 90s. Growing up in the 80s in almost all my memories of adults they are thin
1984 on Aspel & Co.
I'd like to hear Paul do an Elvis impersonation.
I do Elvis and people like it.
"a YOUNG paul McCartney.." ??
I was expecting interview from
'A hard days night' era 😅😅😅
How is he considered young here when he has a bunch of interviews in his 20’s and 30’s that exist as well
James Paul McCartney never made it to his 30's.
2:23 you know you know The Beatles when you already know the answer.
I'm 47 and I still think Paul looks older than me in this interview. Not that he looks old at all...
James Paul McCartney died in car crash on September 11 1966 and was replaced by William (Billy), This is the truth no matter what!
❤❤❤❤
"Widely-Viewed Interview with a Middle-Aged Paul McCartney"
Click bait title, Aspel and co. Paul was in his 40s here 😄
YES VERY YOUNG 😅😅😅
MAYBE 45 HERE
He did interviews when he was actually young, not 42.
how could some people say he wasnt real paul...? non sense
No, not nonsense. If any of the non-believers out there cared to do research, there is enough evidence to support that the real James Paul McCartney passed away in September 1966. It is not a conspiracy theory. People need to stop living in la la land and wake up.
Tracy Ulman is interesting too
The notion of youth has changed nowadays. 😂Because in this video Paul was 42 years old!
Hardly a 'rare' interview.
This can be rare because when Paul comes to the United States he is considered us Prime and what is so neat is that he is a vegetarian. No meat ! How can that be ...
Young Paul McCartney? He's in his 40's here..
Billy was 47 here.
El pol carrea la entrevista
Young? This is 1984, lol. He was 42 and this was post-Beatles, post-Wings 😂
His right eyebrow is like an upside down Nike swoosh.
Who is the woman?
Tracy Ulman. Her show is where 'The Simpsons' started.
She had a video called They Don’t Know About Us in the 80’s. Paul was in it - as if they were an item. It’s awesome!
Hardly young.
He's middle aged ffs 40
It was panned by the critics that film 👍
He was in his 40s, so he was young-ISH
2:33. "What did it cost...." He stole it, didn't he.
I definitely don't this this is Paul. I think it's Billy Shears.
Yeah but you probably think that the Moon landing was faked and the Earth is flat too.
Yes - this is definitely Billy Shepherd (William).
James Paul McCartney had a very special charming face, that would never be able to age.
If Paul had lived to his 40's he would still look like he did in 1964. He wouldn't look like he was 40. Never.
Here, William clearly looks middle-aged.
Hes not too young there. 40 isnt exactly a kid.
A shame that a laugh track was added. Really distracting.
The title of this video has gotta be written by a Gen Z 😂 This is not a “young” Paul McCartney. Young Paul McCartney would be an interview from 1964.
He was 42
not that young. he's just friggen ancient now
Paul's iconic look? Did Elvis Presley ever sport a mullet?
This doesn’t seem real. Paul M always talks slower and here he’s talking fast. People, AI will hit us fast now, question everything
Billy 's green eyes
James Paul McCartney died in car crash on September 11 1966 and was replaced by William (Billy). This is the truth no matter what!
Is it supposed to be fun living in an alternate reality, just making up random junk? Form of entertainment or something?
Is yours the one where Elvis and Tupac are still above ground too?
@@ThamiumOne You know better what it's like to live in an alternate reality. In the real world Paul died in 1966 and was replaced by Billy. This is the truth. 100%
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney : Sure, buddy....
@@ThamiumOne You will see that i was right. I would be curious what opinion you will have about yourself when the truth is found out.
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney - You know what your tone reminds me of? I just realized this, and it's striking.
Ever seen the Charlie Brown Halloween special? It's the one where Linus sits camped out in the pumpkin patch, seriously insisting that a figure he calls the "Great Pumpkin" is about to rise up any moment and toss candy out to everyone. He does this year, after year, after year... "He's coming this time! You'll see!!" And guess what? It NEVER happens. Not once. Everyone tries to tell him this is all in his imagination, but he simply doesn't get it.
This also reminds me of the extremely poor track record of tons of other conspiracy stories. People were convinced that Kate Middleton was dead. Turns out she isn't . People insisting for the last 40 years that Elvis Presley was alive and it would be revealed "soon". He's never shown up, probably for a very good reason, since being buried inside of a concrete slab for a few decades tends to limit one's mobility.
Honestly -- think about how many of these ideas have never wound up being real. You have to admit, it's a pretty pathetic track record.
You know what might be refreshing once in a while? Maybe if you or someone else who says things like this would say : "Here's what I personally believe, but there's always the chance I could be wrong about it". For some reason, we rarely hear that.
A young Paul with his grey hair 😂
Why does everything have to have a laugh in these interviews.
It's canned laughter. Really spoils the show.
Billy Shepherd and Tracey Ullman, two high ranking illuminatiae...Tracey knows more about the passing of kirsty maccoll than she will ever let on.
Billy
Billy Shepherd and Tracey Ullman, two high ranking illuminatiae...Tracey knows more about the passing of kirsty maccoll than she will ever let on.
@@unlimitedhangout5What's the coo with Kirsty Mccall?
McCartney wasn't that young anymore. by then he was already over 40
According to one of the McCartney biographies I read, Paul always needed a partner to write with, even if it was only Linda.
go eels
Young? Not really
At least they talk about Paul and John being 15.
Am I crazy or are they using a laugh track on this show?
They're crazy, not you. The laugh track is really bad quality.
I'm Japanese, and I'm surprised to see the woman next to Paul talking, with her legs crossed. In Japan, that would be extremely rude.
Well as this was filmed in England in the eighties it doesn’t matter how rude you think it is.
Yes he looks young but he’s in his middle age here
Proper scouser
Hello Billy!!!
Not Paul it's Billy Shears
This man ain't Paul McCartney!!
Paul had a very special face that would not be able to look old.
If James Paul McCartney had lived to the 1980's he would look EXACTLY the same as he did in 1964. He wouldn't look like he was 40. Never.
Calze e scarpe inguardabili, non c'entrano nulla col vestito. Paul ha sempre avuto un gusto pessimo per le calzature
Governor
Interview from billy shears you mean