The industry built up around cars and the government itself make too much money to want to stop people driving completely. Road tax, fuel duty, insurance, MOT and servicing costs. And remember, all of the car makers, dealerships used car salesmen and insurance companies all pay vast amounts of tax to the government on their slice of the car pie. Add to this list everyone who has to commute to work and then pays massive amounts of tax and national insurance to the government on what they earn.
@ireallylovegod and I guess the pandemic made sense to you? The lockdowns the special meds? The more we have to rely on the government the more power they have. EVs don't make sense.. Car companies are struggling.
@@joelogjam9163 And also the oil producing countries will be "persuading" governments not to ban cars, particularly ICE cars. The same type of "persuading" that results in football World Cups being awarded to countries like Qatar & Saudi Arabia.
15 minute city's are not that far away ask your council where your council tax is being spent on new bus lanes bike lane one way system into you city one way out and cctv systems all over the place even on the buses yet when a child gos missing thay can't find them
Wouldn't you say that the mobile phone that actually gives away your position , is an ankle bracelet. People are their own worst enemy. Cry about it for a few days , then except it . 😏
@@kylejordan9118 Yes undoubtedly. But it can't yet restrain one. I leave mine at home when going out unless I have a specific need for it. However the pretense is about to be dropped, the real chains will eventually come out and accepting a car that can restrain one is a baby step along that path. They say it cannot interfere with the brakes but in an era of electronic braking systems it would be easy to deploy such a system covertly.
They can already track you both via your mobile and via the ANPR system. That's why all the real revolutionaries use code words via public telephone boxes and ride bicycles. Stay safe out there, comrade.😂
I agree. That people appear not to know this causes me despair. It’s SO easy to push back on all this, at this moment. It just takes enough people to go on a buyers’ strike and pressure will be placed on millions of people, whose livelihoods depend upon automotive turnover. But too many are sitting their hands.
@GT380man Yep, it such an easy target to push back on this. Say no to limiters; make it easier to break the law. Make roads safer; speed everywhere. I’m sure it will be a doddle to mount a legitimate campaign to reverse the decision. Look at how successful the campaigns were to ban the use of speed cameras.
@@GT380man "It’s SO easy to push back on all this, at this moment. It just takes enough people to go on a buyers’ strike and pressure will be placed on millions of people," 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@GT380man The problem having worked in the motor trade, is general apathy of the average car buyer nowadays, who has no interest in cars or driving they only have a car because it's a convivence, thats why you find a lot of new cars sold are little shopping trollies, that you find driving down 50 mph limit roads at 35mph, or sat in the middle lane on motorways at 45mph, what needs to happen is proper driver education, not just taught how to pass a test.
My new Mazda I’ve had for 5 weeks is fitted with Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA). Driving on a 60mph road and getting continuous audio chimes because the system has picked a 20mph sign on a side road is a major distraction. I turn off my audio warning all the time as identifying the wrong speed limit sign or failing to pick up the correct limit happens regularly. The Mazda manual encourages you not to turn off the speed audio warnings as it turns off all the other audio warnings. Unfortunately you have too as it regularly identifies the wrong limit. If cars were forced to slow down I can see accidents happening and a lot of road rage.
Yup, same with my Vauxhall. It gets the speed limit wrong more than it gets it right. This is the real problem. Not that it makes you stick to the limit, but it could make you drive dangerously slow because it doesn't work.
@Trev5 Not sure that is possible. They're required to use cameras to read speed limit signs, but the cameras can't differentiate between speed limit signs for the road you are on, and signs relating to other nearby roads. We can see a speed sign and know that it isn't for us, but the cars can't. They just aren't as smart as humans.
Don't laugh too soon. Have a close look at some light operated crossings. Noticed any palm reading sensors? Noticed the pedestrian directed cameras? This isn't for "safety" it's so that your ID is connected with your walking & the first fine you will get is when you cross the road when the lights aren't permitting you to do so. Thus, on an empty road you will still have to use the lights on the crossing and wait at the side of the road until you are told yo go. It's the globalists Utopia and our Dystopia.
That would mean MORE casualties as they won't be able to move quick enough to avoid all the cyclists and battery scooterists illegally using the pavements.
One step away from getting automatic speeding fines every time you "speed" or when the limiter is required to step in to reduce your "dangerous driving".
Just wait until your vehicle automatically informs the police that you have broken the law by speeding and they automatically issue you with points on your license and/or a fine … it’s coming …
@@barryfieldbattleclips The technology is probably already installed in some EV’s …. Probably just waiting to be activated once it becomes legal … Big Brother is definitely watching us …. 1984 is real after all … who’d of thought it ?
It's a stepping stone towards fully autonomous transport where Government regulators will have complete control, not only will speed be controlled but also who can be permitted to travel and where they can travel?
As usual, most car users are either only vaguely aware of these creeping enforcement innovations, can't or won't see the harm, or are completely ignorant of what's already happened. I foresee that the Starmer government will form an unholy alliance with the Greens and others to effectively legislate most ICE vehicles off the roads of the UK by 2030. This can be easily achieved by limiting supplies of fuel to retailers, and/or raising the duty to astronomical levels all in the cause of achieving some spurious carbon-zero target. Be warned !!
@@roxximusik8958 If so, as Sovereign MEN & WOMEN we will have to Stop Parliament & Use OUR Constitutional Powers & Laws to STOP Govt. Dead in its Tracks.by Invoking The Compact of the Assembly of The 3 Estates..
I don't know how you come up with that but the UK is signed up to UNECE WP29 on the harmonisation of vehicle regulations. It makes it simpler and cheaper for manufacturers if countries have the same vehicle specs. You are allowed to make some small changes to the vehicle regs for your country but you need to have that desire to exclude something stupid like this.
@@andyworsley3908 Oh, they will. The more differences in cars far only one country, the more expensive to produce. That's why BMW produces all its cars with seat heating, even if you don't tick that option box.
Did we? I think Liebour will be only too happy to implement this totalitarian move. They are the WEF party. Hold your heads in shame on anyone who voted for these Elitist shills.
"But why would having a speed limiter upset you if you're not breaking the law" It wouldn't. But then after they've used that argument to convince you to bully me and we all comply. Then they change the law.
@@Stijn5 Just a bit premature there, sunshine. To counter one argument you need to actually present a counter argument, not just a conclusion without supporting arguments. So why exactly will it save more lives than it will take?
@@glenwillson5073 Speed is the number cause for road fatalities, this system will reduce speeding. And I've been driving for 18 years, never had a situation where I had to get over the speed limit to avoid a dangerous situation.
This will slow down the purchases of new cars I would imagine, it's a dumb idea. If you can turn it off, people will, I have the stop start crap, and I turn it off every single time I get in the car, it's a habit now, so doesn't even bother me anymore.
@@Stijn5Of course they can. Speed limiters are software driven and can and simply be turned off. If what you say is true, the emergency services will not be able to exceed the speed limit yet you know that they will. This is merely a software switch.
Australia still imports some diesel Euro 5 model from South America. Plus Mercedes R171 & R172’s are coded for each country of sale, eg UK cars show km/hour all the time, instead of outside temp… Plus mpg instead of litres/km - So programming for country of sale is possible….?
It sounds like “why to invest in speed cameras? Let the car manufacturers spend some more money“. The result, higher prices for the cars. And step by step I believe we move towards a new era where we have less and less control over the products we pay for.
If drivers did what they should do, these things would not have to happen. Drive within the speed limit. If max is 20, min is 10, so drivers should be driving at 15.
That makes TWO reasons not to buy a new car; 1) they are now battery-powered milk-float money pits, and 2) idiotic speed limiters. Sorry, car manufacturers, but you can Foxtrot Oscar - I am keeping my existing cars
I’ve just traveled from Great Yarmouth to Somerset cross country, no motorways, a total of 295 miles mainly on 20, 30, 40, 50 and 70 mph roads , never had a problem keeping within the speed limit using my brain and right foot accordingly,,,,no technology, just me,,,sometimes you need to accelerate to get out of a situation or have an accident,,,,
Accidents are caused by tailgaters, not speed. Every accident, I've ever seen has been a rear end shunt due to the person behind driving too close. It's another lie told to us by our overlords. If they were serious about safety, they would remove all the distractions like touch screens etc. Also the massive road side media screens everywhere. These all distract the drivers, so it's bollocks saying it's road safety. It's about control and taking more of your freedoms away.
we have van trackers at work - they always report if speeding - yet its amazing how many times they are on the motorway and the trackers state the speed limit should be 40mph because it thinks they are on a main road next to the motorway. Imagine if your car dramatically slows to 40mph while in traffic doing 70mph in the fast lane
Whether or not we have these cars ourselves, we are all going to be stuck behind them. Maybe the silver lining is the driver in front actually reaching the limit, rather than cautiously doing 15mph.
All these modern safety systems only seem to be an annoyance and a distraction. The only driver aids I approve of are those systems that monitor driver alertness. With all these ultra slow speed limits one needs something to keep alert.
This is the beast infrastructure and they can stop you from driving if your social credit score is low, because you criticised the government, you are a Christian, your neighbour complained and so on…
It will be interesting to see if they attempt to roll this out for motorcycles eventually, despite the technology being tested by MIRA about 15 years ago and deemed impossible to do safely. Due to the complex dynamics at play when riding a motorcycle, even a momentary interruption in power at the wrong time would be disastrous while cornering. Imagine being banked over at 50mph - then the ISA misreads the road at 30?
Control is everything! Humanity will be peasants, once again, obeying the Lord, and Lady ruling elites! For some reason there's always people on this planet, every generation, who think they deserve to rule everyone else! Always has been! Why, don't know? Science should look if some are born with a Karen gene!
We here in the US are looking at the same mandates with speed limiters and also including breathalyzers. In addition, there are lawmakers that are proposing that blood analysis technology to test for illicit drug use and cameras monitoring both driver and passengers in order to catch improper behavior to be added. When any government issues mandates for public health and safety to save lives, it is always just more government intrusion into personal privacy and restrictions on freedom and control of the behavior of the populous. They want to know and be able to visually observe at all times where you are. Where you are going? What you are doing? Hear what you a saying. It all about controlling people.
Personal transport is of course convenient- road raging recklessness must be stopped; if it takes new technology to do it then so be it. Life should be cherished, not put at risk.
Write it backwards Mate, then they won't spot it. There are sites online that will automatically reverse whatever you write for free. Promise you, it works.
There was a guy a few years ago who protested about speeding by keeping to the 30mph speed limit,he was arrested and prosecuted for GOING TO SLOW IN A 30 MPH LIMIT
So tell us what was on the charge sheet Melvin. Who was this bloke, and where did he commit this crime, so we can check out this tall tale? Did you hear it down the pub or on Facebook? 😂😂😂😂
Years ago a i was at home with a few friends, one of them stopped breathing and went blue. I drove him to the hospital at nearly 4 time the speed limit and he lived.
@@Stijn5 Orwellian is an adjective describing a situation, idea, or societal condition that George Orwell identified as being destructive to the welfare of a free and open society.
Why don't they leave vehicles alone. I can see more accidents with people trying to overtake and the speed limiter kicking in . Used car prices will increase now and new car sales plummit. I don't believe Admiral's claim of 47% in favour of speed limiters insurance companies will love this tech
In my GR Yaris the first thing I do every time I get in is turn off lane assist. Another piece of added stupidity for people who have no interest in driving!
I had a conversation with our local Kia/Mazda dealership over a year ago regarding this initiative. He at that time denied any knowledge of this. Then had a conversation last week regarding our next car on PCP. We said no chance because of this new initiative. He said “oh” 😂
I’m almost sure this already exists on some U.K. spec cars, but don’t quote me lol I’d have to look at a few at work (I sell almost new cars for a living) to be sure. I’m sure I’ve seen options for active speed limiter on or off in menus, or maybe I dreamt it??? 😂 This is gonna drive me crazy now, until I find a car with it already built in 😜🤣 Oh well, my daily driver is 40 years old soon, so it won’t directly effect me, but still, as you say, it takes away people’s skills! I’d love everyone to drive a 40 year old car like me! You have to actually think when driving, as there are absolutely no get you out of trouble features!
What happens when the sat-nav system is not informed or not updated quickly enough about road works on motorways? I have a sat-nav that the last time I used a certain motorway, still showed a 50mph speed restricted section of roadworks and returned to 70mph years ago.
HGV's have to put up with that and have done for year they used to temporary disable them by removing the fuse. So do the same to these when they come in.
The number of vehicles that speed without a second thought, are faced with an inbuilt restriction. If it saves lives and reduces accidents well and good, the jury is out. Adjust, society has wider and deeper needs.
Here’s my comment for what it’s worth. Automatic speed limiters are a bad idea for the reasons you outlined in this video. I use my manual speed limiter or cruse control everywhere though and for this reason never speed anywhere. It’s great fun driving past the speed van or police officer with a speed gun at exactly the published speed limit.
My car has it now, you can switch it on or off in cruise but it recognises speed signs and adjusts the speed automatically - you can then tweek it up or down if you wish to whatever you want - You have to do that again if you want to alter it at whatever the next speed limit change is (ie 30-40 etc). It works really well, I'm sure its saved me many a ticket, its so easy to creep over a 20 limit.
Me too, I drive with my limiter on most of the time and do over 20k per year. It's saved me several times (a year) on motorways and on a few roads where they like to hide. The best time was the idiot desperate to overtake me while I was doing the speed limit in Birmingham. Came round a blind corner and there was a police officer with a camera right in front of us. From that point the guy behind me was perfectly happy doing the speed limit. I also loved the local volunteers who tracked me down the entire road when I was locked to exactly 40, I gave them a wave as they grimmised at me, my wife and cousin were both driving behind me and had caught me up so I saved them tickets too. At the end of the day you can put your foot hard on the accelerator if you need to get out of the way of someone, but the rest of the time it's nice to know you're not going to be funding more cameras and getting stealth taxed.
To all car drivers welcome to the world of Hgv drivers 😂, what nobody has mentioned is when you get stopped by the police they can hook up a device to your car and check how many times you have over ridden the speed limiter and you will have to prove why you did it otherwise you'll be fined and points 😮
I've had one for four years now, it's great! You can turn them off! Great for average speed camera zones. A bit like the anti -khan stuff. The massive rises in car insurance is a much bigger issue
We shouldn't break the law, but we should have a choice whereby we can - that's called 'freedom'. It's that principle that's at stake. For example, I once punched someone in the face - in my view, it was necessary, though I recognised that I could be punished. I made the rational choice of a free adult in the circumstances. Would you accept always having to be in handcuffs when in public, just so that you can't commit a POTENTIAL crime?
If they the government were interested in road safety they would ban car manufacturers from producing cars capable of exceeding the current max speed limit
Fully automated speed limiters based on current technology are dangerous. Not a mile from my house there is a bypass rated at 60 mph. However, as I approach the bypass 9, times of 10, my car fails to report the change in speed so I get an alarm telling me I am exceeding 30 mph when I am actually doing 40 in a 60. Where this gets dangerous is when roads of different speeds pass over each other such as the A46 East of Bath. The road is a 50 mph limit but as the A46 passes under the A46, which is a 30 mph junction, the system gets confused. For a short distance my car is confused and reports it should be doing 30 whilst in a 50. If the brakes were applied automatically, the sudden braking for no apparent reason would at some point result in me getting rear-ended.
I remember Nissan gtr being limited to 115mph unless you're on a track. It'd be interesting to see what percentage of those cars on the road still have that working.
As I recall "all" JDM cars were speed limited from new, because I bought a JDM import in the 90's and the limiter had been programmed out, so I suspect it'll happen to new cars sold now at some point. 🤞🤞🤞
What you've got here is a combination of two things; 1) Drivers just will not obey the limit unless someone is forcing them to, and 2) The campaign by some that limits should be 10mph under what you intend because people will always exceed it. It sucks, but it was inevitable.
OK first off, don't you think it's about time you turned your Star Trek badge into a mic that would look pretty cool. After all it was a coms badge, it may take a little doing but I'm sure it could be done. Secondly this is what happens when you have too many mad drivers around killing too many people, if this doesn't make people think they will take even more control away from the driver, we all suffer due to the nutcase drivers, hiking up our insurance and now having the throttle taken away to a large extent.
We're being penalised to stop us driving, and we're being controlled by rules that dont improve safety and no one needs as we are not children. Speed control is one step away from geofencing and 15 minutes of cities.. With auto shutdown technology that informs the police and locks you in your car if you go outside your area or otherwise break the rules, and if you can't see it coming, then you really need to wake up. 1984 came 40 years late, but it's here, my friend, and the answer is dont buy a new car or an electric car, and it won't happen. Wake up and realise that we are paying for and sleepwalking into our own slaughter. Wake up and stop thinking that this dystopian crap is anything helpful or useful because it's only useful to the globalists and of no use to you.
How do they stop the public not buying newer cars in time to prevent the manufacturers going broke because after the EV debacle, manufacturers need some sales to stay in business.
The problem/issue here is not the speed. It's the control they will have. A mechanism that auto correct the speed is a wonderful idea. However, if they use the same mechanism to control whether you are allowed to drive on a particular day then that's the issue that concerns me
Ah, so if you have a speed limiter working, there is no more danger in a 2 litre sports hatch than a 1 litre car , so insurance will drop on high performance cars, wont it? BWAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !
I would not want a new car if they were giving them away, I will stick with my old Golf gtd 170 that cost me £500 about 4 years ago, now done 230,000 miles and still going strong and well over 50 miles to the gallon at all times! By the way I have never been prosecuted for speeding in almost 45 years of driving!
They need to present the stats properly. Speeding makes up the lowest % of accidents BUT the highest fatalities. If they truly cared about road safety they would focus on the biggest problem on our roads: DRINK DRIVING.
Wrong. The main causes of death on the roads in UK · 1. Speeding · 2. Not wearing your seatbelt · 3. Distractions - using your mobile or a hand-held device
@@jamesmacdonald1116 they do focus greatly on drivers over the limit. even trying to stop people outside pubs getting In their car and trying to stop them. I know as I went from the pub to my car and got stopped before I got in my car, and asked if I wanted to take a breathaliser. I agreed for both myself and everyone's peace of mind. I wasn't over the limit as I am very careful about things like that.
I also think perhaps it should have been brought in for drivers who have been convicted of speeding offenses, it should have been put on their license that they are only allowed to drive cars that have speed limiters fitted, and it should be permenantly on their license plus it must be declared for insurance perposes, failure to declare carries 3 year ban minimum first offense increasing by two years each time caught, after it is placed on their license. That would solve a lot of the problems.
@@Mr4fksake Or maybe the person speeding startles the driver into making mistakes. There is always more than one way to look at these things. I don't like it any more than you but there are some real nut jobs driving around on the roads today, unfortunately all the good drivers will have to suffer because of them, exactly the same way your insurence goes up every year, well thank them for it.
Could you imagine overtaking a car on a 60mph zone and the car you are overtaking is doing 55mph and you indicate and pull out and hit the limiter and has a head on because you could not hit the gas to complete the gas. Will the police have the ability to cut the power of your car remotely? I got driven off the road by a lorry once and I did not have enough power to fully overtake on a dual carriageway. I do not want to work out what buttons to press when in an emergency. I do not believe in FSD and lane assist. GPS signals are worse in Cities with a lot of high rise buildings. The people surveyed are probably the same people that the give way to pedestrians on into junctions. The most annoying road is the A40 is the London 30mph on the average speed limit zone with 3 lanes available. Does it also account for roadworks and smart motorways, people will have to use their brains - that is never good (See UK elections where they were all of automatic self driving mode off a cliff) I do not have an issue with this as I am always falling into 60-50 or 30 zones without knowing, I do not agree with tracking and this will tracking and the automatic guilt through driver telemetry. New EV and new gas cars are just expensive 10 year IOT disposable devices on wheels, could you imagine getting a new screen for your 20 year old EV? There are too many bespoke screens and the cybersecurity on these IOT devices after 10 years will be a dangerous nightmare for software updates. Will netflix/Disney+/UA-cam work on these infotainment systems.
Good! I drive in London with lots of 20mph speed limits - actually rephrase that and its the real problem - lots of 20/30/20/40/20 speed limits that are clearly intended to catch you out by their variation. Going just a couple of mph over the speed limit at 20 is very easy to do, a fine is one thing but points are really harsh in this situation. So, I love that the car will automatically change my speed to the prevailing limit. Why on earth would I want to knowingly drive over the limit?? Embrace it, drive within the law and nothing to grizzle about.
@@ireallylovegod Not true - There is 100% speed control available to the driver. My current car does what you say, ie if it spots a sign by the side of the road it sometimes amends the speed to that, up or down - but it is overridden by using brakes or throttle immediately. The new version (version 2 ) is controlled using GPS, Road Signs, and internal mapping - however, it is completely overridable. See here: "The new speed limit software, also called Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA), is a system designed to automatically regulate a car's speed based on the posted limit. Here's a breakdown of how it works: Using a combination of technologies: GPS data: The car's GPS system tracks its location and identifies the road it's on. Speed sign recognition cameras: Cameras mounted on the car scan for speed limit signs along the road. Sat-nav (satellite navigation): The car's navigation system can also provide stored speed limit information for specific roads. By comparing this information, the ISA system can determine the current speed limit. Enforcing the speed limit: If the car goes above the limit, the ISA can intervene in a couple of ways (depending on the manufacturer's choice): Warnings: The system might give audible or visual warnings like beeps or flashing lights on the dashboard. Engine power restriction: In some cases, the ISA can limit engine power to gradually reduce the car's speed down to the legal limit. It won't slam on the brakes but instead make it harder to accelerate. Driver override: Drivers typically have the option to override the ISA by pressing firmly on the accelerator pedal. This deactivates the system for that journey, but it usually resets upon restarting the car. Important to note: ISA is meant to be an assistant, not an autonomous driving system. The ultimate responsibility for following the speed limit lies with the driver. While some systems may restrict engine power, they are not designed to bring the car to a complete stop. This technology is being implemented with the aim of improving road safety by reducing speeding violations. In short, its safer and quite frankly will stop you having to peer at your speedo constantly, or if you are a chav, you can just floor it everywhere as normal
I have this system on my 2 yr old car but permanently switched to just flash a speed limit sign on the dash , problem is that it is consistently wrong , journey through mid wales the car insisting it was 20mph for 20 miles of 60 mph road after we left a village . Randomly reading speed limits from side roads and the back of european lorries , if the new systems are not better then cars randomly slowing down will be interesting for following cars. This has been mandated by the eu , manufacturers have to fit them or cannot sell cars in europe .
I have a Kia Niro HEV which I love but the one thing that I really hate about it is that the lane assist is ON by default and if I forget to turn it off I drive down the street I live in which has parked cars on both sides and as soon as I pull out to overtake the first parked car my steering wheel is yanked back alarmingly. Why is this feature ON by default?!! This speeding thing will be even worse.
In the Netherlands the roads are used to the max. Every day you have traffic jams at the same locations. Mainly because nobody keeps a gap in between them and the one in front of them. If people would keep open a gap wide enough to fit in 2 or maybe 3 lorries, 18 wheeler length kinda lorries, traffic would keep flowing. BUT, people also have to adjust their speed to the speed of the lorry. And so: IF everyone were to drive the same speed as lorries, and we would all keep open a gap in front of us so people can merge onto the motor way or get off of it, then it would all keep flowing nicely. In the Netherlands the distances to travel are not that much. If you want to travel from the most north-western point to the most south-eastern point, its like say 300 kilometers? Maybe a bit more. If you travel with 100 kilometers an hour and could have that as an average speed, it would take 3 hours. BUT there is no way to travel the entire distance with an average of 100 kilometers per hour. If you were to travel with 80 kilometers per hour, it would take you roughly 3.75 hours. That is again if you could travel with a certain average speed. Nonsense. Me and several co workers have put money on it several times. They start their journey going as fast as the lorry allows.... 83 kilometers per hour. And me, i just put it on 80. I arrive at my destination 2 to 3 minutes later than they did. Lorry drivers who overtake with just 1 kilometer an hour difference, in the Netherlands, they are just crazy. It only wins them what? 1 minute? 2? Or, they jump the queue. They want to be in front of you to unload or load. Sad people, really. There are old pilots and there are bold pilots but not many old bold pilots around. Same goes for the people on the roads. Most who drive like crazy win the Darwin Award. Sometimes taking innocent people with them to Saint Petrus. Personally i think we are on the roads to try to get from A to B safely. And speed? The difference between traveling at 80 kilometer an hour or 100 is not worth mentioning when the distances we travel is short. Lorries travel longer distances than most people in their car. Most people in their car go from their home to work and back, and to the store and back. What kinda distance is that? Does it really help to travel at max speed for to get from a to b if b is only 5 kilometers away from you>? You win what? 3 seconds? And the same for lorries: if the distance is 300 kilometers, and the lorry in front of you can only go 83 kilometer an hour..... but yours can go 84 kilometers an hour.....Those who overtake with such a small difference in top speed are lunatics.
i totally forgot what this video was about.... Anyway, my opinion on speed limiters: if it will make all the car traffic travel at the same speed or just 1 kilometer per hour faster than the lorries, it will be great. Especially if people learn how to keep open a gap in between them and the one in front. Why would this be great? If all traffic on the motor way is traveling at roughly the same speed, it is like a train. And if people keep their distance, others can merge onto or off the main high way/motor way. It is thanks to these individuals who think they own the road that people get stuck in traffic jams. These individuals who go from left to right, the left lane, the right lane, the middle lane. Where ever they see a gap in a traffic jam, they will put their car into the gap. And then they brake. And then they make sure the entire lane is stopped again.
@@ireallylovegod people should be free to do what they want and stop being told what to do the problem is people like you who probably can’t think for them selfs and need to be told what to do there’s times and place the problem people showing off who cant drive
Apparently they will also have the technology to make the car drive at THE correct speed limit , so if the weather is bad as all know you need to slow down slightly especially on say ,a motorway , well good luck with that because that car will do the speed limit regardless,
Id much rather have it similar to cruise control where I can choose to activate it and have it deactivate whenever I use the brake or accelerator. Either I'm in control of my car or I'm not.
If they were really interested in road safety they’d ban touchscreens in cars.
I Second that motion.
I Third that motion
I forth that motion
Indeed. But one doesn't rule out the other.
I fifth that motion
The ultimate goal is not allowing us to drive anymore.
The industry built up around cars and the government itself make too much money to want to stop people driving completely. Road tax, fuel duty, insurance, MOT and servicing costs. And remember, all of the car makers, dealerships used car salesmen and insurance companies all pay vast amounts of tax to the government on their slice of the car pie. Add to this list everyone who has to commute to work and then pays massive amounts of tax and national insurance to the government on what they earn.
@ireallylovegod and I guess the pandemic made sense to you? The lockdowns the special meds?
The more we have to rely on the government the more power they have.
EVs don't make sense..
Car companies are struggling.
Bollocks.
@@joelogjam9163 And also the oil producing countries will be "persuading" governments not to ban cars, particularly ICE cars. The same type of "persuading" that results in football World Cups being awarded to countries like Qatar & Saudi Arabia.
Governments won't be happen until we all return to the horse and cart.😮
And the car manufacturers wonder why no one is keen on buying new cars. Maybe they should stop listening to the politicians idea's.
So they should all make cars that are illegal to sell. Not sure that will end well.
Correct
You know when a Politician has a Stupid Idea……….His lips are moving.
It'll be ankle bracelets for all soon.
Can you feel the prison walls closing in?
15 minute city's are not that far away ask your council where your council tax is being spent on new bus lanes bike lane one way system into you city one way out and cctv systems all over the place even on the buses yet when a child gos missing thay can't find them
Wouldn't you say that the mobile phone that actually gives away your position , is an ankle bracelet. People are their own worst enemy. Cry about it for a few days , then except it . 😏
@@kylejordan9118 Yes undoubtedly. But it can't yet restrain one. I leave mine at home when going out unless I have a specific need for it. However the pretense is about to be dropped, the real chains will eventually come out and accepting a car that can restrain one is a baby step along that path. They say it cannot interfere with the brakes but in an era of electronic braking systems it would be easy to deploy such a system covertly.
They can already track you both via your mobile and via the ANPR system. That's why all the real revolutionaries use code words via public telephone boxes and ride bicycles. Stay safe out there, comrade.😂
@@joelogjam9163 You too!😁
They will shoot themselves in the foot again how will they make revenue for speeding fines if you can’t speed?
POINT!!! 😂😂😂
Haha - great point!
Dumb point, dealing with the aftermath of accidents is way more expensive.
@@Stijn5 No its not
@@GHOOGLEMALE Oh, it most certainly is.
It won't be long before it's mandatory and there'll be no option to switch it off.
And then the world will end....
I agree. That people appear not to know this causes me despair.
It’s SO easy to push back on all this, at this moment. It just takes enough people to go on a buyers’ strike and pressure will be placed on millions of people, whose livelihoods depend upon automotive turnover.
But too many are sitting their hands.
@GT380man
Yep, it such an easy target to push back on this. Say no to limiters; make it easier to break the law. Make roads safer; speed everywhere. I’m sure it will be a doddle to mount a legitimate campaign to reverse the decision. Look at how successful the campaigns were to ban the use of speed cameras.
@@GT380man "It’s SO easy to push back on all this, at this moment. It just takes enough people to go on a buyers’ strike and pressure will be placed on millions of people,"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@GT380man The problem having worked in the motor trade, is general apathy of the average car buyer nowadays, who has no interest in cars or driving they only have a car because it's a convivence, thats why you find a lot of new cars sold are little shopping trollies, that you find driving down 50 mph limit roads at 35mph, or sat in the middle lane on motorways at 45mph, what needs to happen is proper driver education, not just taught how to pass a test.
My new Mazda I’ve had for 5 weeks is fitted with Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA). Driving on a 60mph road and getting continuous audio chimes because the system has picked a 20mph sign on a side road is a major distraction. I turn off my audio warning all the time as identifying the wrong speed limit sign or failing to pick up the correct limit happens regularly. The Mazda manual encourages you not to turn off the speed audio warnings as it turns off all the other audio warnings. Unfortunately you have too as it regularly identifies the wrong limit. If cars were forced to slow down I can see accidents happening and a lot of road rage.
Block the sensors.
@@s99614 put gaffer tape over the sensor job done
Yup, same with my Vauxhall. It gets the speed limit wrong more than it gets it right. This is the real problem. Not that it makes you stick to the limit, but it could make you drive dangerously slow because it doesn't work.
Should take the cars back to the dealer and force manufacturers to fix it…..?
@Trev5 Not sure that is possible. They're required to use cameras to read speed limit signs, but the cameras can't differentiate between speed limit signs for the road you are on, and signs relating to other nearby roads.
We can see a speed sign and know that it isn't for us, but the cars can't. They just aren't as smart as humans.
More Big Brother control. I will continue to drive my curent car (24 years old) for as long as I am able to drive.
Fantastic news for criminals...now the victims cant get away.
The next thing will be a speed limit on all pavements so pedestrians won't get hurt when walking too fast!
🤣
@@Vodzoo666 CopperI AM ARRESTING YOU FOR WALKING ON THE CRACKS IN THE PAVEMENT,COP,I AM ARRESTING YOU BECAUSE YOUR INDICATOR IS BLINKING
,COP,YOU ARE UNDER ARREST FOR WEARING A LOUD SHIRT AT TEN O 'CLOCK AT NIGHT
Don't laugh too soon. Have a close look at some light operated crossings. Noticed any palm reading sensors? Noticed the pedestrian directed cameras? This isn't for "safety" it's so that your ID is connected with your walking & the first fine you will get is when you cross the road when the lights aren't permitting you to do so. Thus, on an empty road you will still have to use the lights on the crossing and wait at the side of the road until you are told yo go. It's the globalists Utopia and our Dystopia.
That would mean MORE casualties as they won't be able to move quick enough to avoid all the cyclists and battery scooterists illegally using the pavements.
One step away from getting automatic speeding fines every time you "speed" or when the limiter is required to step in to reduce your "dangerous driving".
Just wait until your vehicle automatically informs the police that you have broken the law by speeding and they automatically issue you with points on your license and/or a fine … it’s coming …
Demolition man.
Seemingly ford are developing technology to report other cars automatically
@@barryfieldbattleclips The technology is probably already installed in some EV’s …. Probably just waiting to be activated once it becomes legal … Big Brother is definitely watching us …. 1984 is real after all … who’d of thought it ?
It's a stepping stone towards fully autonomous transport where Government regulators will have complete control, not only will speed be controlled but also who can be permitted to travel and where they can travel?
@@markbrowning9363 SO WE WILL HAVE STOP THEM THEN WONT WE.
Ie 15 minutes city’s ie no travel no freedoms no rights but you will be happy ie hunger games they have told you what’s coming
As usual, most car users are either only vaguely aware of these creeping enforcement innovations, can't or won't see the harm, or are completely ignorant of what's already happened.
I foresee that the Starmer government will form an unholy alliance with the Greens and others to effectively legislate most ICE vehicles off the roads of the UK by 2030. This can be easily achieved by limiting supplies of fuel to retailers, and/or raising the duty to astronomical levels all in the cause of achieving some spurious carbon-zero target. Be warned !!
@@roxximusik8958 If so, as Sovereign MEN & WOMEN we will have to Stop Parliament & Use OUR Constitutional Powers & Laws to STOP Govt. Dead in its Tracks.by Invoking The Compact of the Assembly of The 3 Estates..
@@roxximusik8958 if that does happen in the UK by 2030, then I'm off abroad to a less overbearing regime.
You can thank Boris for this. He is the one that signed the country up to this big brother sh!t.
I don't know how you come up with that but the UK is signed up to UNECE WP29 on the harmonisation of vehicle regulations. It makes it simpler and cheaper for manufacturers if countries have the same vehicle specs. You are allowed to make some small changes to the vehicle regs for your country but you need to have that desire to exclude something stupid like this.
@@gdll9247 These changes won't make vehicles cheaper.
@@andyworsley3908 Oh, they will. The more differences in cars far only one country, the more expensive to produce. That's why BMW produces all its cars with seat heating, even if you don't tick that option box.
Do you really think that the politicians are in charge?
@@meuknowwho7041 And who is? The "deep state", "the jews", "the illuminati", ...?
And people ask "why did we leave the EU? !!!!
And you get it anyway because labour is driving car manufacturer off with fines.
It is above the EU. Vehicle design specs are governed by UNECE WP29. The EU acts as the facilitator for this within Europe.
Did we? I think Liebour will be only too happy to implement this totalitarian move. They are the WEF party. Hold your heads in shame on anyone who voted for these Elitist shills.
Speed limited vehicles will kill people in emergency situations.
"But why would having a speed limiter upset you if you're not breaking the law"
It wouldn't.
But then after they've used that argument to convince you to bully me and we all comply. Then they change the law.
It will save more lives than it will take. There goes your "argument".
@@BauregardSenior87 Change the law to what?
@@Stijn5
Just a bit premature there, sunshine.
To counter one argument you need to actually present a counter argument, not just a conclusion without supporting arguments.
So why exactly will it save more lives than it will take?
@@glenwillson5073 Speed is the number cause for road fatalities, this system will reduce speeding. And I've been driving for 18 years, never had a situation where I had to get over the speed limit to avoid a dangerous situation.
This will slow down the purchases of new cars I would imagine, it's a dumb idea. If you can turn it off, people will, I have the stop start crap, and I turn it off every single time I get in the car, it's a habit now, so doesn't even bother me anymore.
i only ride old school superbikes lol :) just bought a suzuki gsxr1000 k4 . no emissions ,no bollocks .
Nice
Good job we left the the EU, oh yeh, we didnt!
You did, carmakers just won't adapt for you alone.
@@Stijn5Of course they can. Speed limiters are software driven and can and simply be turned off. If what you say is true, the emergency services will not be able to exceed the speed limit yet you know that they will. This is merely a software switch.
Australia still imports some diesel Euro 5 model from South America. Plus Mercedes R171 & R172’s are coded for each country of sale, eg UK cars show km/hour all the time, instead of outside temp… Plus mpg instead of litres/km - So programming for country of sale is possible….?
This video is to demonstrate walking in the UK is faster than the traffic in the background.
🤣 Certainly appeared that way, but to be fair, that Lexus probably stopped on Kingsbury High Road for shopping 😉
HahA depends how meny miles u can walk .
It sounds like “why to invest in speed cameras? Let the car manufacturers spend some more money“. The result, higher prices for the cars. And step by step I believe we move towards a new era where we have less and less control over the products we pay for.
@@constantinmogos WE WILL IF CBDCs COME IN.WE,SHOULD VOTE NO CONFIDENCE IN LABOUR PARTY
If drivers did what they should do, these things would not have to happen.
Drive within the speed limit. If max is 20, min is 10, so drivers should be driving at 15.
That makes TWO reasons not to buy a new car; 1) they are now battery-powered milk-float money pits, and 2) idiotic speed limiters. Sorry, car manufacturers, but you can Foxtrot Oscar - I am keeping my existing cars
@@gjs321 there is one way to STOP EVs DONT BUY THEM. SIMPLES.
I think they'll flip flop on it when they stop getting speeding fines.
No, every time it is activated you will get a fine!
@@bobsvanthings2226 actually you're right
In spite of the denials they will bring in national pay per mile to cover the loss of revenue from speeding fines.
First step in shutting them off.
I’ve just traveled from Great Yarmouth to Somerset cross country, no motorways, a total of 295 miles mainly on 20, 30, 40, 50 and 70 mph roads , never had a problem keeping within the speed limit using my brain and right foot accordingly,,,,no technology, just me,,,sometimes you need to accelerate to get out of a situation or have an accident,,,,
well done but how many other drivers haven’t kept to the speed limit.
Accidents are caused by tailgaters, not speed. Every accident, I've ever seen has been a rear end shunt due to the person behind driving too close. It's another lie told to us by our overlords. If they were serious about safety, they would remove all the distractions like touch screens etc. Also the massive road side media screens everywhere. These all distract the drivers, so it's bollocks saying it's road safety. It's about control and taking more of your freedoms away.
we have van trackers at work - they always report if speeding - yet its amazing how many times they are on the motorway and the trackers state the speed limit should be 40mph because it thinks they are on a main road next to the motorway.
Imagine if your car dramatically slows to 40mph while in traffic doing 70mph in the fast lane
Whether or not we have these cars ourselves, we are all going to be stuck behind them.
Maybe the silver lining is the driver in front actually reaching the limit, rather than cautiously doing 15mph.
Anyone with an old 4x4 with bull bars might find a way to bump draft these limited cars.
I have an ex royal mail van.
Ive owned it for 15 years.
It still has its 65mph speed limiter.
No need to remove/remap.
It doesn't bother me.
Ur prob jabbed too
@@flipedude5404 wrong but thanks for outing yourself as a moron.
I can only imagine how this is going to play out when people start with the spray paint and stencils 😂😂😂
I already have Intelligent Speed Assist in my car.
Though she doesn't like it when I call her that.
😂😂😂
Governments don't care about your safety. It's all about control
All these modern safety systems only seem to be an annoyance and a distraction. The only driver aids I approve of are those systems that monitor driver alertness. With all these ultra slow speed limits one needs something to keep alert.
Quite happy with my 17yr old Vauxhall Astra. Gonna keep sticking with un-connected cars for as long as possible! 😊🙂
What does work is wearing a white T-shirt with a large 10 mph sign on the front. This really does work!
Time to invest in a GPS jammer then!
Won't work.
Take the sim out of the car.
@@Dazuk2023 Won't work either.
@@Stijn5 what will happen?
@@SpareSomeChange8080 Nothing will happen. And you can just turn the system off, dramaqueen.
This is the beast infrastructure and they can stop you from driving if your social credit score is low, because you criticised the government, you are a Christian, your neighbour complained and so on…
It will be interesting to see if they attempt to roll this out for motorcycles eventually, despite the technology being tested by MIRA about 15 years ago and deemed impossible to do safely. Due to the complex dynamics at play when riding a motorcycle, even a momentary interruption in power at the wrong time would be disastrous while cornering. Imagine being banked over at 50mph - then the ISA misreads the road at 30?
Why do goverments hate us? Is there a department or minister ,for making our lives shit.
That would be the WEF/UN where western governments get their orders.
Control is everything!
Humanity will be peasants, once again, obeying the Lord, and Lady ruling elites!
For some reason there's always people on this planet, every generation, who think they deserve to rule everyone else!
Always has been!
Why, don't know?
Science should look if some are born with a Karen gene!
It the clueless liberals in society.
@@ispy3836 if the government won't stop all this crap we havto protest on a large scale.
@@melvinplant8637and how are you going to complain to the EU when you arnt even a member.
We here in the US are looking at the same mandates with speed limiters and also including breathalyzers. In addition, there are lawmakers that are proposing that blood analysis technology to test for illicit drug use and cameras monitoring both driver and passengers in order to catch improper behavior to be added. When any government issues mandates for public health and safety to save lives, it is always just more government intrusion into personal privacy and restrictions on freedom and control of the behavior of the populous. They want to know and be able to visually observe at all times where you are. Where you are going? What you are doing? Hear what you a saying. It all about controlling people.
@@ireallylovegod
I think that they are already watching us via our cellphones, smart TVs, and our own home security cameras.
and keeping them alive
Personal transport is of course convenient- road raging recklessness must be stopped; if it takes new technology to do it then so be it. Life should be cherished, not put at risk.
I said how to block them and it was deleted by YT as usual.
Write it backwards Mate, then they won't spot it. There are sites online that will automatically reverse whatever you write for free. Promise you, it works.
It looks like this Mate:
.Mate this like looks It
OR this:
.etaM siht ekil skool tI
@@goldeneddie I just wonder how many will actually read it though. Interesting nevertheless. Thanks
@@scaryfakevirus I'g read it! And pass it on. Don't let the censors grind you down - go for it!
There was a guy a few years ago who protested about speeding by keeping to the 30mph speed limit,he was arrested and prosecuted for GOING TO SLOW IN A 30 MPH LIMIT
Presumably you mean "going too slowly".
@@AHoundOnAHonda I meant what I said,cos that's what the cop said but I say it anyway
@@melvinplant8637 The cop didn't know the difference between "to" and "too"? Shocking! 😄
So tell us what was on the charge sheet Melvin. Who was this bloke, and where did he commit this crime, so we can check out this tall tale? Did you hear it down the pub or on Facebook? 😂😂😂😂
The speed sign wasn't blue by any chance was it?
I can see the mechanics will be making money to remove them 😂😂
Soon, you will just ask your AI assistant to reflash the ecu with your preferences.
Years ago a i was at home with a few friends, one of them stopped breathing and went blue. I drove him to the hospital at nearly 4 time the speed limit and he lived.
Canada Australia New Zealand the UK and Europe always seem to be the testbed of all things Orwellian.
You should learn the meaning of Orwellian.
@@Stijn5 Orwellian is an adjective describing a situation, idea, or societal condition that George Orwell identified as being destructive to the welfare of a free and open society.
@@nuthinasitseems5213 Ah, and that system is destructive to society. Right....
@@nuthinasitseems5213 Move to the total s hole that is the US then. Or even better, Putin's garbage hole.
@@Stijn5 You really don't get it, do you ?
Speed limiters are dangerous and I will program out any fitted to my car
Likewise. This sounds like a stupidly dangerous idea
Why don't they leave vehicles alone. I can see more accidents with people trying to overtake and the speed limiter kicking in . Used car prices will increase now and new car sales plummit. I don't believe Admiral's claim of 47% in favour of speed limiters insurance companies will love this tech
You can just turn it off, little dramaqueens.
@@Stijn5 Has to be done every trip and in some cases several layers deep through the on screen software.
@@matthewjenkins1161 Yep. You won't stop legislation, so deal with it.
This is one of the most unsafe things I've heard about. Imagine your car suddenly braking in the middle of an overtake.
Thongs can be tricky at the best of times 🤣🤣🤣
@@BrownCarGuy OMEGALUL. Fixed my type error.
@@Ome99 🤣👍🏽
They won't allow it in the UK because they will loose too much money in speeding fines.
In my GR Yaris the first thing I do every time I get in is turn off lane assist. Another piece of added stupidity for people who have no interest in driving!
I had a conversation with our local Kia/Mazda dealership over a year ago regarding this initiative.
He at that time denied any knowledge of this.
Then had a conversation last week regarding our next car on PCP.
We said no chance because of this new initiative. He said “oh” 😂
There needs to be massive fines on council executives for every obscured item of road signage.
If you turn off the limiter you may also find your insurance refuse to pay as you have turned off a safety device
Whether in School zones or country roads mad drivers speed to overtake, driving oncoming traffic off the road, race track is safer.
Speed kills. Life ends. Full stop. Crazy raging drivers.😢
Not only will the government lose money with VAT on new car sales, but the tax revenue on fuel will plummet as cars will use much less fuel.
And more drivers and pedestrians will live longer. Plenty of drivers in the cemetery
I’m almost sure this already exists on some U.K. spec cars, but don’t quote me lol
I’d have to look at a few at work (I sell almost new cars for a living) to be sure. I’m sure I’ve seen options for active speed limiter on or off in menus, or maybe I dreamt it??? 😂
This is gonna drive me crazy now, until I find a car with it already built in 😜🤣
Oh well, my daily driver is 40 years old soon, so it won’t directly effect me, but still, as you say, it takes away people’s skills!
I’d love everyone to drive a 40 year old car like me! You have to actually think when driving, as there are absolutely no get you out of trouble features!
You can turn the system off.
Thank God I’m old. Never thought I’d say that. The world’s gone mad.
Autobahn? Why do people think speed kills, it's crap drivers
This is why they started drive by wire years ago. Older cars had a throttle cable so there was no electronics to control.
What happens when the sat-nav system is not informed or not updated quickly enough about road works on motorways? I have a sat-nav that the last time I used a certain motorway, still showed a 50mph speed restricted section of roadworks and returned to 70mph years ago.
My speed limiter is my right foot. When it gets tired, I press harder.😂
classic car prices will rocket
HGV's have to put up with that and have done for year they used to temporary disable them by removing the fuse. So do the same to these when they come in.
The number of vehicles that speed without a second thought, are faced with an inbuilt restriction. If it saves lives and reduces accidents well and good, the jury is out. Adjust, society has wider and deeper needs.
So at a stroke, this will make any performance car redundant, what will be the point in buying an M3 Ferrari Porsche etc?
We need it because so many drivers cannot manage to drive to the speed limits. Their fault.
Here’s my comment for what it’s worth. Automatic speed limiters are a bad idea for the reasons you outlined in this video. I use my manual speed limiter or cruse control everywhere though and for this reason never speed anywhere. It’s great fun driving past the speed van or police officer with a speed gun at exactly the published speed limit.
My car has it now, you can switch it on or off in cruise but it recognises speed signs and adjusts the speed automatically - you can then tweek it up or down if you wish to whatever you want - You have to do that again if you want to alter it at whatever the next speed limit change is (ie 30-40 etc). It works really well, I'm sure its saved me many a ticket, its so easy to creep over a 20 limit.
Me too, I drive with my limiter on most of the time and do over 20k per year. It's saved me several times (a year) on motorways and on a few roads where they like to hide. The best time was the idiot desperate to overtake me while I was doing the speed limit in Birmingham. Came round a blind corner and there was a police officer with a camera right in front of us. From that point the guy behind me was perfectly happy doing the speed limit. I also loved the local volunteers who tracked me down the entire road when I was locked to exactly 40, I gave them a wave as they grimmised at me, my wife and cousin were both driving behind me and had caught me up so I saved them tickets too.
At the end of the day you can put your foot hard on the accelerator if you need to get out of the way of someone, but the rest of the time it's nice to know you're not going to be funding more cameras and getting stealth taxed.
Since Wales introduced the 20 mph speed limit, there has been more road deaths and accidents. yet the Welsh government is keeping hush about it.
To all car drivers welcome to the world of Hgv drivers 😂, what nobody has mentioned is when you get stopped by the police they can hook up a device to your car and check how many times you have over ridden the speed limiter and you will have to prove why you did it otherwise you'll be fined and points 😮
I've had one for four years now, it's great! You can turn them off! Great for average speed camera zones. A bit like the anti -khan stuff. The massive rises in car insurance is a much bigger issue
@@ireallylovegod You can turn them off, don't believe the bs
We shouldn't break the law, but we should have a choice whereby we can - that's called 'freedom'. It's that principle that's at stake. For example, I once punched someone in the face - in my view, it was necessary, though I recognised that I could be punished. I made the rational choice of a free adult in the circumstances. Would you accept always having to be in handcuffs when in public, just so that you can't commit a POTENTIAL crime?
If they the government were interested in road safety they would ban car manufacturers from producing cars capable of exceeding the current max speed limit
Been on the cards for years, that is why they tried bring in a law to stop you altering your vehicle prior to this.
Fully automated speed limiters based on current technology are dangerous. Not a mile from my house there is a bypass rated at 60 mph. However, as I approach the bypass 9, times of 10, my car fails to report the change in speed so I get an alarm telling me I am exceeding 30 mph when I am actually doing 40 in a 60.
Where this gets dangerous is when roads of different speeds pass over each other such as the A46 East of Bath. The road is a 50 mph limit but as the A46 passes under the A46, which is a 30 mph junction, the system gets confused. For a short distance my car is confused and reports it should be doing 30 whilst in a 50. If the brakes were applied automatically, the sudden braking for no apparent reason would at some point result in me getting rear-ended.
I remember Nissan gtr being limited to 115mph unless you're on a track. It'd be interesting to see what percentage of those cars on the road still have that working.
As I recall "all" JDM cars were speed limited from new, because I bought a JDM import in the 90's and the limiter had been programmed out, so I suspect it'll happen to new cars sold now at some point. 🤞🤞🤞
What you've got here is a combination of two things; 1) Drivers just will not obey the limit unless someone is forcing them to, and 2) The campaign by some that limits should be 10mph under what you intend because people will always exceed it. It sucks, but it was inevitable.
OK first off, don't you think it's about time you turned your Star Trek badge into a mic that would look pretty cool.
After all it was a coms badge, it may take a little doing but I'm sure it could be done.
Secondly this is what happens when you have too many mad drivers around killing too many people, if this doesn't make people think they will take even more control away from the driver, we all suffer due to the nutcase drivers, hiking up our insurance and now having the throttle taken away to a large extent.
Indeed, like the nutcase driver that was behind me this morning. Love the badge/mic idea. Will look into that 🤣🖖🏽
We're being penalised to stop us driving, and we're being controlled by rules that dont improve safety and no one needs as we are not children. Speed control is one step away from geofencing and 15 minutes of cities.. With auto shutdown technology that informs the police and locks you in your car if you go outside your area or otherwise break the rules, and if you can't see it coming, then you really need to wake up.
1984 came 40 years late, but it's here, my friend, and the answer is dont buy a new car or an electric car, and it won't happen. Wake up and realise that we are paying for and sleepwalking into our own slaughter. Wake up and stop thinking that this dystopian crap is anything helpful or useful because it's only useful to the globalists and of no use to you.
How do they stop the public not buying newer cars in time to prevent the manufacturers going broke because after the EV debacle, manufacturers need some sales to stay in business.
Can't wait to hear from our Spanish cousins lol on their autovias with all their lower speed limit signs on their slip roads
The problem/issue here is not the speed.
It's the control they will have.
A mechanism that auto correct the speed is a wonderful idea. However, if they use the same mechanism to control whether you are allowed to drive on a particular day then that's the issue that concerns me
So where will they get the money to replace all the speeding fines?
Thanks Brown car guy 🤗
Ah, so if you have a speed limiter working, there is no more danger in a 2 litre sports hatch than a 1 litre car , so insurance will drop on high performance cars, wont it?
BWAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !
No, it will increase on 1 litre cars. That's how it works. You can't win, you will lose, you have to drive.
@@MrMWRMWR I dont, i got a bus pass now.
@MrChriss000 😄 I'll accept that - bus pass user here too whenever possible.
We are in Europe!
We left the European Union
Thanks for your video, I do know this area, you are in Kingsbury, I like buying the bread from Sim Sim bakery.
I think they are a great idea apart from on trunk roads. Look at the delays trucks cause because of speed limiters on Motorways.
I would not want a new car if they were giving them away, I will stick with my old Golf gtd 170 that cost me £500 about 4 years ago, now done 230,000 miles and still going strong and well over 50 miles to the gallon at all times! By the way I have never been prosecuted for speeding in almost 45 years of driving!
They need to present the stats properly. Speeding makes up the lowest % of accidents BUT the highest fatalities.
If they truly cared about road safety they would focus on the biggest problem on our roads: DRINK DRIVING.
Wrong. The main causes of death on the roads in UK · 1. Speeding · 2. Not wearing your seatbelt · 3. Distractions - using your mobile or a hand-held device
@@Stijn5 which is what I stated, the most fatalities are from speed.
@@jamesmacdonald1116 they do focus greatly on drivers over the limit. even trying to stop people outside pubs getting In their car and trying to stop them. I know as I went from the pub to my car and got stopped before I got in my car, and asked if I wanted to take a breathaliser. I agreed for both myself and everyone's peace of mind. I wasn't over the limit as I am very careful about things like that.
And the bloody POT HOLES.
Middle lane muppets, drinking is a minority related figure actually!
I also think perhaps it should have been brought in for drivers who have been convicted of speeding offenses, it should have been put on their license that they are only allowed to drive cars that have speed limiters fitted, and it should be permenantly on their license plus it must be declared for insurance perposes, failure to declare carries 3 year ban minimum first offense increasing by two years each time caught, after it is placed on their license.
That would solve a lot of the problems.
Wake up and get a life, it's usually someone else that causes an accident, not necessarily the one speeding !!
@@Mr4fksake Or maybe the person speeding startles the driver into making mistakes.
There is always more than one way to look at these things.
I don't like it any more than you but there are some real nut jobs driving around on the roads today, unfortunately all the good drivers will have to suffer because of them, exactly the same way your insurence goes up every year, well thank them for it.
This is a great innovation, now you can drive all day long with your foot flat on the floor and not get a ticket.🚗
Could you imagine overtaking a car on a 60mph zone and the car you are overtaking is doing 55mph and you indicate and pull out and hit the limiter and has a head on because you could not hit the gas to complete the gas. Will the police have the ability to cut the power of your car remotely? I got driven off the road by a lorry once and I did not have enough power to fully overtake on a dual carriageway. I do not want to work out what buttons to press when in an emergency. I do not believe in FSD and lane assist. GPS signals are worse in Cities with a lot of high rise buildings.
The people surveyed are probably the same people that the give way to pedestrians on into junctions. The most annoying road is the A40 is the London 30mph on the average speed limit zone with 3 lanes available. Does it also account for roadworks and smart motorways, people will have to use their brains - that is never good (See UK elections where they were all of automatic self driving mode off a cliff)
I do not have an issue with this as I am always falling into 60-50 or 30 zones without knowing, I do not agree with tracking and this will tracking and the automatic guilt through driver telemetry.
New EV and new gas cars are just expensive 10 year IOT disposable devices on wheels, could you imagine getting a new screen for your 20 year old EV? There are too many bespoke screens and the cybersecurity on these IOT devices after 10 years will be a dangerous nightmare for software updates. Will netflix/Disney+/UA-cam work on these infotainment systems.
Good! I drive in London with lots of 20mph speed limits - actually rephrase that and its the real problem - lots of 20/30/20/40/20 speed limits that are clearly intended to catch you out by their variation. Going just a couple of mph over the speed limit at 20 is very easy to do, a fine is one thing but points are really harsh in this situation. So, I love that the car will automatically change my speed to the prevailing limit. Why on earth would I want to knowingly drive over the limit?? Embrace it, drive within the law and nothing to grizzle about.
@@ireallylovegod Not true - There is 100% speed control available to the driver. My current car does what you say, ie if it spots a sign by the side of the road it sometimes amends the speed to that, up or down - but it is overridden by using brakes or throttle immediately. The new version (version 2 ) is controlled using GPS, Road Signs, and internal mapping - however, it is completely overridable. See here:
"The new speed limit software, also called Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA), is a system designed to automatically regulate a car's speed based on the posted limit. Here's a breakdown of how it works:
Using a combination of technologies:
GPS data: The car's GPS system tracks its location and identifies the road it's on.
Speed sign recognition cameras: Cameras mounted on the car scan for speed limit signs along the road.
Sat-nav (satellite navigation): The car's navigation system can also provide stored speed limit information for specific roads.
By comparing this information, the ISA system can determine the current speed limit.
Enforcing the speed limit:
If the car goes above the limit, the ISA can intervene in a couple of ways (depending on the manufacturer's choice):
Warnings: The system might give audible or visual warnings like beeps or flashing lights on the dashboard.
Engine power restriction: In some cases, the ISA can limit engine power to gradually reduce the car's speed down to the legal limit. It won't slam on the brakes but instead make it harder to accelerate.
Driver override:
Drivers typically have the option to override the ISA by pressing firmly on the accelerator pedal. This deactivates the system for that journey, but it usually resets upon restarting the car.
Important to note:
ISA is meant to be an assistant, not an autonomous driving system. The ultimate responsibility for following the speed limit lies with the driver.
While some systems may restrict engine power, they are not designed to bring the car to a complete stop.
This technology is being implemented with the aim of improving road safety by reducing speeding violations.
In short, its safer and quite frankly will stop you having to peer at your speedo constantly, or if you are a chav, you can just floor it everywhere as normal
I have this system on my 2 yr old car but permanently switched to just flash a speed limit sign on the dash , problem is that it is consistently wrong , journey through mid wales the car insisting it was 20mph for 20 miles of 60 mph road after we left a village . Randomly reading speed limits from side roads and the back of european lorries , if the new systems are not better then cars randomly slowing down will be interesting for following cars. This has been mandated by the eu , manufacturers have to fit them or cannot sell cars in europe .
If they force you to follow the speed limit, they will lose out on all that revenue. Do you really think governments want to lose all that revenue
if nobody buys new cars they will have a problem
I have a Kia Niro HEV which I love but the one thing that I really hate about it is that the lane assist is ON by default and if I forget to turn it off I drive down the street I live in which has parked cars on both sides and as soon as I pull out to overtake the first parked car my steering wheel is yanked back alarmingly. Why is this feature ON by default?!! This speeding thing will be even worse.
In the Netherlands the roads are used to the max.
Every day you have traffic jams at the same locations.
Mainly because nobody keeps a gap in between them and the one in front of them.
If people would keep open a gap wide enough to fit in 2 or maybe 3 lorries, 18 wheeler length kinda lorries, traffic would keep flowing.
BUT, people also have to adjust their speed to the speed of the lorry.
And so: IF everyone were to drive the same speed as lorries, and we would all keep open a gap in front of us so people can merge onto the motor way or get off of it, then it would all keep flowing nicely.
In the Netherlands the distances to travel are not that much. If you want to travel from the most north-western point to the most south-eastern point, its like say 300 kilometers? Maybe a bit more.
If you travel with 100 kilometers an hour and could have that as an average speed, it would take 3 hours.
BUT there is no way to travel the entire distance with an average of 100 kilometers per hour.
If you were to travel with 80 kilometers per hour, it would take you roughly 3.75 hours.
That is again if you could travel with a certain average speed.
Nonsense.
Me and several co workers have put money on it several times.
They start their journey going as fast as the lorry allows.... 83 kilometers per hour.
And me, i just put it on 80.
I arrive at my destination 2 to 3 minutes later than they did.
Lorry drivers who overtake with just 1 kilometer an hour difference, in the Netherlands, they are just crazy.
It only wins them what? 1 minute? 2?
Or, they jump the queue. They want to be in front of you to unload or load.
Sad people, really.
There are old pilots and there are bold pilots but not many old bold pilots around.
Same goes for the people on the roads.
Most who drive like crazy win the Darwin Award. Sometimes taking innocent people with them to Saint Petrus.
Personally i think we are on the roads to try to get from A to B safely.
And speed?
The difference between traveling at 80 kilometer an hour or 100 is not worth mentioning when the distances we travel is short.
Lorries travel longer distances than most people in their car. Most people in their car go from their home to work and back, and to the store and back. What kinda distance is that?
Does it really help to travel at max speed for to get from a to b if b is only 5 kilometers away from you>?
You win what? 3 seconds?
And the same for lorries: if the distance is 300 kilometers, and the lorry in front of you can only go 83 kilometer an hour..... but yours can go 84 kilometers an hour.....Those who overtake with such a small difference in top speed are lunatics.
i totally forgot what this video was about....
Anyway, my opinion on speed limiters: if it will make all the car traffic travel at the same speed or just 1 kilometer per hour faster than the lorries, it will be great.
Especially if people learn how to keep open a gap in between them and the one in front.
Why would this be great?
If all traffic on the motor way is traveling at roughly the same speed, it is like a train.
And if people keep their distance, others can merge onto or off the main high way/motor way.
It is thanks to these individuals who think they own the road that people get stuck in traffic jams.
These individuals who go from left to right, the left lane, the right lane, the middle lane. Where ever they see a gap in a traffic jam, they will put their car into the gap.
And then they brake.
And then they make sure the entire lane is stopped again.
Most of people who get questions on this road safety the questions always loaded
@@ireallylovegod people should be free to do what they want and stop being told what to do the problem is people like you who probably can’t think for them selfs and need to be told what to do there’s times and place the problem people showing off who cant drive
id like to see them try, on my metro :)
Apparently they will also have the technology to make the car drive at THE correct speed limit , so if the weather is bad as all know you need to slow down slightly especially on say ,a motorway , well good luck with that because that car will do the speed limit regardless,
Id much rather have it similar to cruise control where I can choose to activate it and have it deactivate whenever I use the brake or accelerator. Either I'm in control of my car or I'm not.