INDYCAR actually allows every driver to race, tends to be entertaining, rarely boring. F1 is is barely discovering the concept of wheel to wheel racing, only 1-3(at best) are allowed to compete
@@davidvasquez08 there is tons of wheel to wheel racing more in the pre 2010s then it dropped off for a bit during recent years tgen has picked up again with these new regulations, you really don’t know f1
I like Indy more, but those F1 cars are bonkers. I think they are 2 different disciplines that happen to have the same basic car layout, not unlike SuperCars and Nascar.
Dampers are allowed to be developed in Indycar. The one thing about F1 really is about is the braking force that it has. The brakes in F1 are way superior to Indycar’s brakes. Fueling is gravity fed and not force fed when F1 had refueling.
The brakes are the one thing that get most commented about when a driver from another series gets to try an F1 car. I remember when they gave Jeff Gordon a few laps in a Williams car back in the 90s his first comment was "I wish I had these breaks on my (NASCAR) cup car".
F1 is elite, the constant improvements ensures that the team you support has potential to get an upgrade and improve throughout the season. If u start the season at the back of the grid u don’t needa stay there and that’s what I like. Plus the implementation of a cost cap has leveled the playing field a good bit
Another difference is that while F1 races all over the world, all its drivers, outside a handful of token pay drivers with back-of-the-grid teams, are European while IndyCar features drivers from all over the world, but only races in North America. The one thing in F1 I've always thought was better done was the points system. It gave more emphasis to the winner and was also simpler to figure out without all the complications of IndyCar or the different ridiculous NASCAR points formulas.
Indy…. Sorry CART (I’m sorry, I’ll be quiet now) .. are much better to watch. I don’t care about ovals or road courses… they all take specialised skills. . But Indy, so much closer and much more.
First off using gay as an insult is the most unoriginal tasteless thing, and ironically there’s nothing more gay than being hyper fixated on calling things gay. Second most of the drivers in Indycar are European anyway, so if you were approaching this from a ‘Amurica good Europe ‘gay’’ stance then you’re still wrong. And thirdly have you seen how many female f1 fans there are? Trust me as a woman, f1 is far from gay.
This video clearly has bias it’s generally considered NASCAR is the number to series and to see Indy cars ahead of that shows insane bias And yes NASCAR would be considered a single seater
Dude nascar isn’t considered a single seater. Yeah there’s only one seat but it’s a stock car, only thing stopping them from adding more seats is that there isn’t anyone else in the car. INDYCAR is a single seater in that it’s a car designed for one person, nascar is a stock car series, it’s a stock car, which has multiple seats, modified to be a racecar
Scott Dixon’s 234 mph was his average speed, but his top speed was 241 mph. Indycar uses the average speed to determine the field, not the top speed.
234mph lap times on ovals are not rare. An F1 car even reaching speeds of 235mph for a short time has only happened a couple of times.
IndyCar always exciting and un expected results, while F1 is a parade as 99% results are predictables
INDYCAR actually allows every driver to race, tends to be entertaining, rarely boring. F1 is is barely discovering the concept of wheel to wheel racing, only 1-3(at best) are allowed to compete
You clearly don’t watch F1. There’s almost always wheel to wheel racing weather it be at the front, middle or back of the grid.
@@spartin8968 only recently, historically it’s never been that way, and I’ve watched F1 for awhile now
@@spartin8968 F1 is an expensive follow the leader
@@davidvasquez08 there is tons of wheel to wheel racing more in the pre 2010s then it dropped off for a bit during recent years tgen has picked up again with these new regulations, you really don’t know f1
@@samuelwallis360 get off the rose tinted glasses
I like Indy more, but those F1 cars are bonkers. I think they are 2 different disciplines that happen to have the same basic car layout, not unlike SuperCars and Nascar.
Right now Palou hit curve at 243mph!! With only 720hp, F1 more than 1000hp, imagine Indy with 1000hp would be insane!
It's a good overview of both series and what makes them different. No complaints
These are really great, well produced and informative videos!
Glad you like them!
It’s simple, on an oval, the Indy car wins every time. On a road course the F1 car wins every time.
Dampers are allowed to be developed in Indycar. The one thing about F1 really is about is the braking force that it has. The brakes in F1 are way superior to Indycar’s brakes. Fueling is gravity fed and not force fed when F1 had refueling.
The brakes are the one thing that get most commented about when a driver from another series gets to try an F1 car. I remember when they gave Jeff Gordon a few laps in a Williams car back in the 90s his first comment was "I wish I had these breaks on my (NASCAR) cup car".
The indy 500 no longer gives double points
F1 is elite, the constant improvements ensures that the team you support has potential to get an upgrade and improve throughout the season. If u start the season at the back of the grid u don’t needa stay there and that’s what I like. Plus the implementation of a cost cap has leveled the playing field a good bit
Another difference is that while F1 races all over the world, all its drivers, outside a handful of token pay drivers with back-of-the-grid teams, are European while IndyCar features drivers from all over the world, but only races in North America. The one thing in F1 I've always thought was better done was the points system. It gave more emphasis to the winner and was also simpler to figure out without all the complications of IndyCar or the different ridiculous NASCAR points formulas.
Indy car has way better wheel to wheel racing. F1 has better one lap Pace
Indy 500 qualifying is based of average speed of 4 laps not time.
Great vid
Indy…. Sorry CART (I’m sorry, I’ll be quiet now) .. are much better to watch. I don’t care about ovals or road courses… they all take specialised skills. . But Indy, so much closer and much more.
Romain Grosjean has crashed in both.
this video is full of incorrect facts.
F1 is gay. Indycar is not gay.
What’s the context here ??
First off using gay as an insult is the most unoriginal tasteless thing, and ironically there’s nothing more gay than being hyper fixated on calling things gay. Second most of the drivers in Indycar are European anyway, so if you were approaching this from a ‘Amurica good Europe ‘gay’’ stance then you’re still wrong. And thirdly have you seen how many female f1 fans there are? Trust me as a woman, f1 is far from gay.
@@notaspeck6104 Dude, it’s totally gay
@@randygravel2057 boi WTF is the full context here
@@randygravel2057 and f1 here is aiming to have it’s first women in a while
This video clearly has bias it’s generally considered NASCAR is the number to series and to see Indy cars ahead of that shows insane bias And yes NASCAR would be considered a single seater
Dude nascar isn’t considered a single seater. Yeah there’s only one seat but it’s a stock car, only thing stopping them from adding more seats is that there isn’t anyone else in the car. INDYCAR is a single seater in that it’s a car designed for one person, nascar is a stock car series, it’s a stock car, which has multiple seats, modified to be a racecar