+LimitIsIllusion In the future they will have lover robots much better looking than your favorite actress with larger boobs, that are much better lovers than any woman on earth, and yea you wont get to shag them*
Ted Joseph that's not possible dinosaur D.N.A faded away 65 million years ago it lasts for only 1000 years once it's gone it's gone But it is possible to clone a neanderthal or a cute dodo but not a dinosaur we can reverse the D.N.A of a chicken to make a dino bird hybrid but not an actual dinosaur
I think the most intelligent answer to this question was uttered by Jeff Goldblum in "Jurassic Park": "Just because scientists COULD recreate dinosaurs, they never stopped to think if they SHOULD." As his character also said, dinosaurs were marked for extinction - they flourished in their time, then other life forms took their place, like mankind. Perhaps Steven Spielberg had it right the first time.
the were taken off this earth unfairly. they were the real creation of "god" this planet were made for them we have only lived here for a few thousand years and in that short time we have only destroyed this beautifly designed planet. we should not be here but we are so the least we can do is try to bring back the rightful owners
tiffsaver Jurassic Park wouldn't happen because... holy shit, the amount of security that would go into, not keeping the dinosaurs under control, but keeping creationist freaks nowhere near them for fear of them killing the animals out of fear or martyrdom.
They claimed to have found the fossilized remains if a chicken with teeth. Don't know about the webbed feet though. I don't think you would like it very well though. It was carnivorous and aggressive as hell. So I don't think it would be a very good idea.
Actually, right now is basically the future... we made Tesla, nano technology, and much more... me and you will be alive by 2060 and maybe they’ll find ways to make people live longer? Who knows?
Congratulations to all the people who commented below on the best way to kill a T Rex! The thing hasn't even been resurrected yet, after 65 Million years in oblivion, and all you want to do as soon as it makes its first tender steps into a new existence, is blow its head off?!!!!
Sam Littlefield Sorry mate, but we don't know that for sure, i bet dinosaurs were far more inteligent than animals of today, more we discover about dinosaurs more we learn that they had multiple ways to live, which is a good thing when you look at it, for example what makes us inteligent or at least shows that we are, it is the way our people can do things differently, for example a butcher can cut off some meat, and a baker can cook some bread, which myself would not be able to do. this is what inteligence is really about, the fact that a specy or a group of species, can live together and do things than individuals can't. Dinosaurs seem to work the same as us, not as a specy, but as a group of species, which in a way it shows their inteligence, and we only know few of them, thanks to fossiles. So we can't say or predict that they were dumb as birds, and why would they be, because they lived a far more time away ? They lived more time than all of us, or any other animals (not includes reptiles such as crocodiles), time does not make you more inteligent. So to me Dinosaurs were really smart, and if they would not have died, today i bet they would rule the world and be an inteligent race.
Michio Kaku and his ilk scare the shit out of me as they blindly assert that science is going to save the planet ... or else we can just pop over to another one and start again.
@@thedolphin5428 Isn't that what is has always done ? Early man originated in Africa and developed tools which enable him to spread across the world. Much later when economic devastation hit, many countries developed ships and sailed for the new world. When one area is full, mankind moves on. We can only do this with science. So far God (of whatever flavour) has not showed up and been of no help whatsoever. If science fails us then we are doomed. There is nothing else.
Reminds me of something someone said in a Futurama that: "It's actually cheaper to genetically engineer real ones". It may be a bit ironic, but I think we might get to the point were we can engineer dinosaur-like creatures before we ever find enough DNA to clone a real one.
Yeah ik and I'm pretty sure they said that the dinos didn't have feathers in jurassic park because they did something with their dna to make them not have it or something like that
Understand that would be incredible dangerous being that he lived in such a different time. If he experience our age he'd most likely freak being we are so technological advance compare to there age where lets face it he see a T.V and possibly believe in witch craft. I would like to bring back Einstein being that he wouldn't be to far back and might be able to get use to everything though some things we have would be mind blowing to him lol.
But then there is a chance he wouldn't be a genius at all and instead of being the brilliant person he is might turn into one of the kids we have in our generation at the moment saying swag and yolo and all of that
xxkre epz well, copying his genes and DNA PERFECTLY would mean that he would still have a very high IQ. That meaning that over his life span in this day would bring even further advances in science. Once people invent cloning, significant people would be cloned over and over and eventually wouldnt be very special.
Just cause his IQ is high though there is a chance he'll want nothing to do with science..I sure man kids of my generation have a great level of intelligence but do they apply it? From what I seen not at all
I don't think it has change that much in the last 20.000 years. But if you're talking about the Mesozonic Era, then yes, it would be too different for dinasours to breath without problems.
This guy gets me excited for the future. I hope they perfect immortality in my life time just so I can witness all these amazing advances. Granted I'll be extremely bored waiting for each one over the centuries...
SH33 - were in the near future... look at a lot of we accomplished... Tesla, Bugatti’s with shit tons of horse power, drones, fighter jets and gun ships, robots... by 2060, think about how much will change.
What an amazing guy he is, I'm a big fan!! I'm 14, amd it's funny how I don't hang out with people a lot.. coz I'm so caught up with this! I just find science really, really interesting and I actually watch a lot of his videos!!:)
Well, if we managed to bring back dinosaurs and somehow create a dinosaur park, just make sure that: 1. Hire reliable people (not just 1) that could control the park, don't just hire one person who controls the whole system, especially if he wants to steal the dinosaur embryos. 2. Make sure to have a separate electrical system for the control room, embryo storage, and dinosaur fences, so that when someone does want to steal the embryos, he could just switch off one of them, this way it would be much safer. 3. Make a clear path to the power plant, perhaps surround the path with sharp fences, so that in case of an ambush, you could still be safe.
+Velvet Worms16: That was a joke, son. Right after discussing the hypothetical question of whether to put resurrected Neanderthals in a zoo or have them attend Harvard, he said _"This is a question that we're gonna be facing in the coming decades,_ because it is possible that we might be able to bring back the mammoths."
i really hope i can see dinosaurs in my lifetime,i cant imagine the relief of seeing even 1 dinosaur,big or small,carnivore or herbivore,just 1 dinosaur.that’s it.
The question I have is: Even if we succeed in bringing the dinosaurs back to life, do we automatically have the right to treat them the way we want, be it scientific or entertainment purposes? While it will be true that we brought back something into existence that technically isn't supposed to exist, it doesn't change the fact that it will be a life form. Point being that it will still have consciousness and feelings like any other animal we have in our animal kingdom. Will they have any animal rights? I know this too far fetched for now.
The beauty of Quantum computing. Perhaps not today Michio, but, when we master Quantum Computing (Which by the way, will be in our life time) we will be able to do such tasks. Hmm, the future is going to be very interesting.
How do you know that mastering Quantum Computing or even building Quantum Computers usable by the masses is possible in our life time? I'm a Computer Scientist and I don't know that at all. We're making progress, but we've also made progress in other fields at the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress like Nuclear Fusion for more than half a century without working power plants.
Pls no dragons im not looking forward to a dragon burning my house down cause one day a dragon or a creature will get into the wrong hands and be used as a super weapon
I would rather us bring back the Neanderthal, but place them on a similar earth like planet. Let them evolve on their own. Of course it must also be unaware's to them, because they would see us as Gods.
Even though it would be amazing to have a real-life Jurassic park, I can't help but imagine all of the things that could go wrong. What if the dinosaurs escape and start attacking people? Imagine waking up and seeing a huge T-rex looking into your bedroom window, or a giant Pterodactyl swooping over your head. They talk about mixing all of these dinosaur genes, but in my mind I'm feeling like it could turn out all wrong. What if the dinosaurs turn out to be more dangerous than the original dinosaurs? In the end, a part of me would love to see a real dinosaur, but the risks might outweigh the benefits.
It would never happen. The dinosaurs lived in a much more oxygen rich environment than we have today, which has a crucial role in the sense of how big animals and mammals can get. If we could hypothetically clone dinosaur dna, the dino would either die prematurely, or grow to a much smaller size.
Omar Khalil I'm aware of that, but even though we have weapons I'm pretty sure a dinosaur could still do a lot of damage and it would probably take a long time to kill one because of their size.
Omar Khalil Yes, that would be stupid. I don't think they would build it near where people are, but I was thinking if they escaped and made it near where people live then that would be scary.
In the future you wont have to work (machines do everything), and ull be surrounded by super hot lover robots, they will look back at us and laugh and say hahahah poor bastards. In-fact this very comment will be used as the ultimate irony generator but fortunately I'll be long dead and avoid the humiliation!
You think that scientist created a robot that said loud and clear i want to wipe out the human race and it said that in front of thousands upon thousands of people you probably dont want a terminator stage
While the scientific implications are really fascinating, I would strongly advice against messing with human ancestors (even those on a different evolutionary branch). That would raise a host of ethical problems, such as the line between animal and human (at what point do we grant a living thing the same rights and duties assigned to humans). It would be scientifically be of enormous value however to recreate extinct animals or plants, in order to better understand history and evolution. There may be some useful implication for today, assuming genetic engineering would be able to clone our own organs, we could transplant a copy of our damaged organs, avoiding all the problems related to organ rejection. There is only one organ that would not make sense to replace: the part of the brain that defines ourselves.
That statement is incorrect. We could fit every person in this entire planet inside the State of Texas and we still wouldn't fill the whole state with our mass.
Sorry, but that's incorrect. There are hundreds if not thousands of square kilometers that are empty and ready to be colonized. In South America for example. The problem is, we like to concentrate in small places and based on that claim that Earth is overpopulated. But few kilometers(or miles if you prefer) from cities there is empty space. Also, many developed countries have very small birthrate. I believe Japan have negative birthrate. So overpopulation is definitely not a problem.
Łukasz Kuczyński Read the prev comments, it is a figurative speach. Many places indeed have "room", but we dont live in a single place, we travel, we need buildings... Dinos are HUGE and would destroy just by step in the wrong place if we make then free (as any creature should be).
ever since JP came out when i was a kid, ive always hoped we would bring back a couple dinosaur species. or even the mammoth. although, i hear malcoms voice saying "dinosaurs had their shot but nature selected them for extinction"... seriously though, this type of genetics and cloning could be used to save species we have today that are being killed off by humans
CPapadakis - Maybe, but that's not what the video was about. Saving the current animals on the extinction list has nothing to do with reconstructing their genes.
Why not resurrect Woolly Mammoth? Dodo? Stellers Sea Cow? you've seen jurassic park right? i know its cool but what would those big giant lizard do to this generation. -,-
you do know I think with the correct security we would be able to have dinosaurs and let the public see them and in jp1 the fences were ridicules but if we use the correct things like the JW enclosures I think it would be safe the only reason that happened becuase they didn't think Dino's were enough
MrJamesLongstreet some things we shouldn't do and i'm not stating that to be a prick. its like we have nukes and we could use them, but should we use them? sure different situations may call for their use but is that the only way? within the context of this video i was mostly quoting one of the characters from Jurassic Park. just because we can resurrect the dinosaurs should we bring back all of them or just a few? or any of them at all? what would happen to our ecosystem if we did? just because i can kill a guy doesn't mean i should
H.M. Murdock Im sure they are talking about bringing them back to study and learn, not make a freaking park or release them to the wild, plus if you read the book Jurassic Park, the whole place was a clusterfuck right from the get go
I'm more than a little confused as to why someone who worked on the failing field of string theory a few decades ago is given the authority to comment about all fields of science at all scales and in all instances, as though what he has to say is any more valid than anyone you'd find on the street.
***** So? If they took any animal biologist off any university campus, they would give a more informed view than a former string theorist. And having worked with them, I can tell you the answer is a resounding "no", not even "in theory". That's not how genetics works, and that's not how evolution works.
You don't have to believe me. I won't tell you what my profession is. But I have just as much credibility as a former string theorist on matters of biology even if I had no credentials whatsoever. But DNA does decay. Neanderthal DNA has been recovered and analyzed from tens of thousands of years ago, highly fragmented and piecemeal. Imagine what DNA would look like after 65,000,000 years for dinosaurs. It just doesn't make sense. You can't 'recover' DNA like an old deleted file. Once it's gone it's gone. Tell me where the genetic information is supposed to come from after the DNA has disintegrated?
***** That's a question of whether or not enough of it exists to fill the gaps. That's 'theoretically possible' but still very far-future stuff, and nobody would fund it.
There is a huge difference between the methods that Jurassic Park uses to get dinosaurs and the method that Dr. Kaku specifies. In Michio Kaku's example we would control the characteristics and qualities of a new being to create something that looks like a dinosaur. In this fashion we will be able to alternate how smart the creatures are, how they think and process the world, or even make them docile herbivores if we choose. I doubt, if we had control over a computer that created these, that we would make monstrous creatures that outsmart and eat us.
Hasret Alija Also bear in mind the environment has changed greatly, including the atmospheric quality, It's lifespan would probably be very short due to the different air quality which is, to be frank, bullshit compared to what it once was long, long ago. also what it would eat and digest wouldn't live any more... it would be a tragic life for the thing.
Jake Zephyr That's exactly what the characters of geneticist Dr. Wu and John Hammond presumed too. However, in the end their lack of discipline with newly founded genetic power (potent in itself) proved their downfall. We're talking about animals that went extinct 65 million years ago; our lives are a mere blink of an eye in the history of this world. The idea of 'controlling' such creatures with computers seems unethical and precarious anyway. Also, animals escape all the time from their holding pins in zoos. It's not uncommon to hear about the occasional pig or the moose running around out of their cages. The point is, life is a force that is so adaptive and complex that attempting to control it will yield disastrous results. This is because life in inherently unpredictable and chaotic. Science tells us how to create such creatures, but it doesn't tell us if we should.
I don't understand how Mr Kaku is qualified to answer such questions. This is a bio question, and he specializes in astrophysics. The two fields bare nothing in common.
If you watch his lectures about the future, he says he has interviewed something like 100 scientist in all fields about what they think the future will be like and what is possible in the future with technology. So yes he does say that he has studied in a certain field of physics, but he took the info he got from all these other scientists, and has put all this info in various books he has written and in his lectures he gives.
***** Well actually, no he's not. Its not his field. In theoretical physics he would most certainly kick my butt to the moon and back. In other topics, where he is not a qualified professor, his knowledge would be limited. He would not have the time to read journals and be up to date with the scientific literature in that field. Believe me it is bloody hard to do that for just one topic. Let alone the range of topics Mr Kaku comments on.
Correct....you want to understand? He's a "science personality"..that is why they have him commenting on any general science. people like watching/hearing him.
***** Good at ___ physics. A PhD in biology is more knowledgeable about biology than Kaku I will assume... when he talks about general science topics it is because he is a personality not because he is an expert.
Why the living FUCK would we want to bring back a T-Rex? I don't wanna be sleeping one day in my bed and wake up to see a T-Rex and go "oh hey buddy, mind not eating me?"
Michio Kaku as a Dad. Son: Dad why is my penis smaller than all the other kids? Michio Kaku: Well son...That has to do with genes! Genes tell our body how to make all its proteins. Some genes are instructions for proteins that regulate the activity of other genes. Such 'control genes' govern important events in the developing Son interrupts Dad: It's because we are Asian isn't it!?
Wheres that T-Rex at allready!? C'mon you had SIX years!!! We..the T-Rex fan community.., are very patient people, but enough is enough!!! There should be like a dino-race between Russia, USA, and China!!! Instead of the silly arms race currently going on leading to 0 dino's so far.. We the fans demand action.., and im pretty sure 'the rastafarian lobby' stands with us on this one!! Ps. A really cool chicken could allso do. Until better solutions are found!!
In their defense the DNA IS 66.000.000 years old. Have YOU ever cloned anything with THAT old DNA!? No? Didn't think so! Saying they have never existed seem pretty far out. After all the bones collected by archeologist worldwide... They all in on a big scam.., and not ONE has come forth with it.., that's what you are saying? :)
Im not saying im sure of anything. But currently i find the evidence provided by the paleontologist to be more credible, than what i have seen from conspiracy theorists in this matter!? Everyone can throw out a claim with nothing other than words and homemade videos to back it up... Search ' the rastafarian lobby'... You remind me of that guy!
Flowey The Flower first we have to get enough DNA before you say bam and most of it is already gone so the better method is to activate the DNA of a chicken so that it grows teeth ++++++
Do we have any flat part of Jesus's body in any of the relics? it would be fun to bring him back to life, maybe we could see if he really had superpowers or not
Well although I don't believe in the supernatural the first explanation to a clone not having superpowers would have to be the idea that it is not genetic nor physical, just a knowledge of how to manipulate "supernatural forces"
Gordon Fredrick Technically, it only seems to us observers to have been an accident, for nature, objective and blind to subjective attributes, just happens--neither accidentally nor intentionally. Nature just "is".
Everything happens for a reason, that's a quote that is true every time. Think about it, if dinosaurs weren't extinct we wouldn't be here right now, they could've evolved into bigger and more dangerous creatures. Humans would've never survived in such a harsh environment. The universe is programmed by the almighty creator. Everything that has or will happen can be explained simply because it was programmed to do so.
So I have a question if there are genes in our bodies that are turned off since nature doesn't get rid of anything is there genes in our body that hasn't yet been turned on and can we turn them on as well as turn genes off?
At 1:25 Michio Kaku states, "Dinosaurs perished 65 million years ago, not tens of thousands of years ago. However, something had happened that I never thought would happen in my lifetime, and that is that we have soft tissue from the dinosaurs". However, the more logical conclusion would be that perhaps the purported 65 million years is wrong, and the soft tissue proteins never survived for all those millions of years, but the cataclysmic event that killed off the dinosaurs is within the memory of man ... I'm surprised that a genius like Michio Kaku cannot see such an obvious corollary.
There is already the experience of what happens with "clones" made from some "re-juveniled" adult cells. The cloned sheep. They won't live very long and may suffer from various diseases - by occurring imperfections just because it is the case in an adult cell, having already experienced many many re-generations of itself, which causes errors in the genome by nature, and also, adult cells are differentiated cells, not primary fetal cells which still can specialize into any kind of cell lateron. The piece of art is for a real mammal to be re-created with normal usual life expectancy is that we have to get hands on native fetal primary cells. Root cells. These are NOT cells which are taken from somewhere off a living mammal or from fossiles. So where to get Neanderthal primary cells resp. undifferentiated DNA, or dinosaur primary cells. This is obviously hard to find, especially in withered fossils. What to find: hermetically encapsulated, air-free, unwithered, well-cooled, undamaged root/primary DNA from somewhere. Antarctica ? This is world's coldest refrigerator as we know so far. Maybe northern Sibiria or north-Canadian permafrost areas as well.
We shouldn't be playing around with genetics like this. We need to leave the past in the past. In the famous words of Ian Malcom, "Dinosaurs had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction."
Want to get Smarter, Faster™?
Subscribe for DAILY videos: bigth.ink/SmarterFaster
We'll be good as long as they don't decide to put all the dinosaurs in one park, with one guy controlling the whole operation.
It's OK though if we use UNIX and hire 12 year old girls who know this!
What could possibly go wrong ?
@Smokey To be honest, it's quite interesting to see extinct species back on Earth.
I hope they don't hire a fat guy who tried to steal embryos and send it to biosyn so that they could beat Ingen.
Spare no expense
He’s such an amazing communicator. We’re lucky to have people like him to convey complex ideas into terms that the rest of us can understand!
If we were to put a Neanderthal in the zoo, I'm guessing it would be as a paid employee.
Fahrenheit4051 have you never seen Encino Man?
It would tell you let's play raid shadow legends 😂
This reminds me of what they did with Ota Benga
People like Michio should be living forever. Absolutely love him and his work
Or transfer all his memory to AI or a Robot in his image.
@@MeetJohnnyNg yeah, kaku for infinity Lol
@@MeetJohnnyNg And if he can't, put Caroline instead.
He pisses me off when he tells me about all the things that may be possible one day far beyond my lifetime. Stop doing that.
+LimitIsIllusion In the future they will have lover robots much better looking than your favorite actress with larger boobs, that are much better lovers than any woman on earth, and yea you wont get to shag them*
your son will ride raptors and fly on gigant birds.
soon you will be able to sync your brain with PCs and play games in virtual reality!
well not cuz all oil ob the planet will dry out 56 years latee
well not cuz all oil ob the planet will dry out 56 years latee
Jeesh.. I can't wait to see IPhone video of someone getting eaten by a dinosaur at a dinosaur zoo in Disney World..
Not looking forward to yet another vertical video though.
lol world star
Ted Joseph that's not possible dinosaur D.N.A faded away 65 million years ago it lasts for only 1000 years once it's gone it's gone
But it is possible to clone a neanderthal or a cute dodo but not a dinosaur we can reverse the D.N.A of a chicken to make a dino bird hybrid but not an actual dinosaur
Ted Joseph ill pay to see that
Ted Joseph don't you mean *Jurassic World? 😏
can we plz kickstart this? :D
Could you imagine how many cows it would take to feed a T rex?
probebly 1. maybe 2.
idk
never had meat
We can get exotic joe to feed them chicken from Walmart
Vegans would be super angry and protest to kill it ! 😂..
10
The dodo $5 special available at kfc
David Cobb more like the 5 dollar velociraptor fill up
Lmfao
🤣🤣🤣💀
You would be at KFC
David Cobb give it 60 years at least and we'll be eating dodo chicken
I think the most intelligent answer to this question was uttered by Jeff Goldblum in "Jurassic Park": "Just because scientists COULD recreate dinosaurs, they never stopped to think if they SHOULD." As his character also said, dinosaurs were marked for extinction - they flourished in their time, then other life forms took their place, like mankind. Perhaps Steven Spielberg had it right the first time.
I was just about to say something along those lines myself, certainly making a reference to Jurassic Park.
Why shouldn't we make dinosaurs? Seems like a reasonable thing to do, I need to know if they taste like chicken!
the were taken off this earth unfairly. they were the real creation of "god" this planet were made for them we have only lived here for a few thousand years and in that short time we have only destroyed this beautifly designed planet. we should not be here but we are so the least we can do is try to bring back the rightful owners
Still, let 's clone dinosaurs and not be reckless.
tiffsaver Jurassic Park wouldn't happen because... holy shit, the amount of security that would go into, not keeping the dinosaurs under control, but keeping creationist freaks nowhere near them for fear of them killing the animals out of fear or martyrdom.
So dinosaurs taste like chicken?!
very likely
Well chickens are dinosaurs soooo
Mmm yum
The T-Rex is closer to chickens than the Stegosaurus
they taste like human
I wanna see a web footed chicken with teeth
They claimed to have found the fossilized remains if a chicken with teeth. Don't know about the webbed feet though. I don't think you would like it very well though. It was carnivorous and aggressive as hell. So I don't think it would be a very good idea.
***** lmao ur explanation put a hilarious visual in my head! Thank you....
They may soon be on the menu at McDonalds.
I'm currently building one. I'll get back to ya...
Do you want them to take over? Because That's how webbed footed chickens with teeth take over
Please bring back Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla and George Carlin.
@Bagabones Felis you lost me at trump
L D Yeah they will probably die instantly after seeing how the sjw are corrupting academia and society.
Well, you can't and never will be.
you cant bring back a individual its wont be that nikola tesla you knew idk how can you not understand this
Issac Newton too, although i have a feeling he will won't be friends with Einstien.
I really hope that I am around to see this happen.
It is incredibly likely, since we've already successfully cloned a sheep all the way back in 1996.
might be done in the 2029 or 2030's
Vault Boy your gunna die before me hahaha
You there?
@@divyam3351 Maybe
he's so approachable looking, speaks so simply and has this ability to make you feel like he's talking only to you. plus he's a genius of course
Sadly, our lifespan is too short for us to see the exciting stuff the future holds :(
What about the horrible stuff?! Our lifespan is perfect as it is.
So does the scientist that's processing and resurrecting the extinct ones
Actually, right now is basically the future... we made Tesla, nano technology, and much more... me and you will be alive by 2060 and maybe they’ll find ways to make people live longer? Who knows?
I saw a newspaper where they were talking about cloning organs so we could live a lot more, I hope it's being made
@@Arnold-yv5ym i want to live till 2080 see the world end
I love the way he sometimes holds back his laugh at his own statements 😂😂😂. This man is a living legend.
Call me insane, but I believe that this has already been done in some classified scientific study somewhere in this crazy world :/
i agree
L
I believe they probably have
There was this Greek scientist who claims he has already done stuff like this
Im sure the have brought back a dinosaur but it probably died due to problems the first few minutes or came out deformed
There you have it! The Egg came first.
Congratulations to all the people who commented below on the best way to kill a T Rex!
The thing hasn't even been resurrected yet, after 65 Million years in oblivion, and all you want to do as soon as it makes its first tender steps into a new existence, is blow its head off?!!!!
LOL, my fellow Americans.
Sam Littlefield Sorry mate, but we don't know that for sure, i bet dinosaurs were far more inteligent than animals of today, more we discover about dinosaurs more we learn that they had multiple ways to live, which is a good thing when you look at it, for example what makes us inteligent or at least shows that we are, it is the way our people can do things differently, for example a butcher can cut off some meat, and a baker can cook some bread, which myself would not be able to do. this is what inteligence is really about, the fact that a specy or a group of species, can live together and do things than individuals can't.
Dinosaurs seem to work the same as us, not as a specy, but as a group of species, which in a way it shows their inteligence, and we only know few of them, thanks to fossiles. So we can't say or predict that they were dumb as birds, and why would they be, because they lived a far more time away ? They lived more time than all of us, or any other animals (not includes reptiles such as crocodiles), time does not make you more inteligent.
So to me Dinosaurs were really smart, and if they would not have died, today i bet they would rule the world and be an inteligent race.
wellm we can find out if it tastes like chicken
Florian Floppy they are very close to crocodiles ... crocodiles are not "ruling the world" lol & they have been around.
The comment section scares me.
Your picture makes me hungry
Jordan Cookie Me too. 😂
Michio Kaku and his ilk scare the shit out of me as they blindly assert that science is going to save the planet ... or else we can just pop over to another one and start again.
The Dolphin without science what do we have? Our planet is in crisis and the only way to help it is with science, what else do you think we can use?
@@thedolphin5428 Isn't that what is has always done ? Early man originated in Africa and developed tools which enable him to spread across the world. Much later when economic devastation hit, many countries developed ships and sailed for the new world. When one area is full, mankind moves on. We can only do this with science. So far God (of whatever flavour) has not showed up and been of no help whatsoever. If science fails us then we are doomed. There is nothing else.
Reminds me of something someone said in a Futurama that: "It's actually cheaper to genetically engineer real ones". It may be a bit ironic, but I think we might get to the point were we can engineer dinosaur-like creatures before we ever find enough DNA to clone a real one.
It would be absolutely amazing to have dinosaurs walk the earth again (and dangerous) but sadly they would just most likely be hunted.
Don’t worry they will probably be small as chicken
I'd hunt a Dino. From a helicopter.
Okay, we literally have three, soon to be four, movies about why resurrecting or cloning dinosaurs is a bad idea.
but Jurassic World was considered the safest park in the world until some assholes fucked up with the Indominus
nothing epic about being eaten alive loool
It's a movie, the dinosaurs don't even have feathers
superkai64 well some dinosaurs didn’t have feathers, some where covered and some where only partly covered
Yeah ik and I'm pretty sure they said that the dinos didn't have feathers in jurassic park because they did something with their dna to make them not have it or something like that
T-Rex? Neanderthals? Screw that, bring back Sir Isaac Newton!
Understand that would be incredible dangerous being that he lived in such a different time. If he experience our age he'd most likely freak being we are so technological advance compare to there age where lets face it he see a T.V and possibly believe in witch craft. I would like to bring back Einstein being that he wouldn't be to far back and might be able to get use to everything though some things we have would be mind blowing to him lol.
xxkre epz He would not have his old life memories.. he would grow up as if he was naturally born in this time.
But then there is a chance he wouldn't be a genius at all and instead of being the brilliant person he is might turn into one of the kids we have in our generation at the moment saying swag and yolo and all of that
xxkre epz well, copying his genes and DNA PERFECTLY would mean that he would still have a very high IQ. That meaning that over his life span in this day would bring even further advances in science. Once people invent cloning, significant people would be cloned over and over and eventually wouldnt be very special.
Just cause his IQ is high though there is a chance he'll want nothing to do with science..I sure man kids of my generation have a great level of intelligence but do they apply it? From what I seen not at all
If I am not mistaken, atmosphere composition was fairly different back then. Would the prehistoric creatures be able to breathe here at all?
Yes because its only a few not billions LIKE it was before
I don't think it has change that much in the last 20.000 years. But if you're talking about the Mesozonic Era, then yes, it would be too different for dinasours to breath without problems.
Yup they will breath up all the O2 we have and drink all of water and breed nonstop😑
That was the biggest build up to "No, we can't" I have ever seen...
This guy gets me excited for the future. I hope they perfect immortality in my life time just so I can witness all these amazing advances. Granted I'll be extremely bored waiting for each one over the centuries...
Love this professor big fan of his, his such an open minded individual who is open to all apects of possibilities 🤗😍😘😉💖💖💗👌👌👏👼
this sounds like a horror story waiting to happen. IM SO EXCITED!!
Dr. Tyson showed me my love for knowledge. You sir have broadened my horizons as well.
I wish I was born some decades in the future so I can see the technology advancements and possible resurrections of dinosaurs
Alec Hernandez i hope that im able to see all this, those advancements need to hurry up tho.
SH33 - were in the near future... look at a lot of we accomplished... Tesla, Bugatti’s with shit tons of horse power, drones, fighter jets and gun ships, robots... by 2060, think about how much will change.
@@Arnold-yv5ym i think especially in tech..a lot has changed in last 20 years...especially last 10
currently man can literally fly like iron man😂
Thing that struck me, when I saw video is 10yrs old, wow, time flies...
What an amazing guy he is, I'm a big fan!! I'm 14, amd it's funny how I don't hang out with people a lot.. coz I'm so caught up with this! I just find science really, really interesting and I actually watch a lot of his videos!!:)
good on you. keep it up!👍
I think , you now got 25 years old
@@carelessness2868 probably the next Einstein by now
@@ConnorJWFalshaw who are you ? Why did you tag me
@@carelessness2868 I was making a joke that the person you said was 25 now was now Einstein from pursuing science
Well, if we managed to bring back dinosaurs and somehow create a dinosaur park, just make sure that:
1. Hire reliable people (not just 1) that could control the park, don't just hire one person who controls the whole system, especially if he wants to steal the dinosaur embryos.
2. Make sure to have a separate electrical system for the control room, embryo storage, and dinosaur fences, so that when someone does want to steal the embryos, he could just switch off one of them, this way it would be much safer.
3. Make a clear path to the power plant, perhaps surround the path with sharp fences, so that in case of an ambush, you could still be safe.
0:42 - Wait, so we'll have to decide whether to put mammoths in a zoo or have them attend Harvard?
DanHarkless ﴾Halloween videos, YTPs, & more﴿
*Neanderthal*
+Velvet Worms16: That was a joke, son. Right after discussing the hypothetical question of whether to put resurrected Neanderthals in a zoo or have them attend Harvard, he said _"This is a question that we're gonna be facing in the coming decades,_ because it is possible that we might be able to bring back the mammoths."
animal rights fam
+Alexiosization: True, mammoths should have the right to choose to go to a non-Ivy-League school if they want. 😉
+George Deming: I'll repeat the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn:
"I say, I say, that was a joke, son."
i really hope i can see dinosaurs in my lifetime,i cant imagine the relief of seeing even 1 dinosaur,big or small,carnivore or herbivore,just 1 dinosaur.that’s it.
Why let your dreams be dreams?
You can see plenty of dinosaurs in the poultry aisle or in the avian section of a pet store. :)
The question I have is: Even if we succeed in bringing the dinosaurs back to life, do we automatically have the right to treat them the way we want, be it scientific or entertainment purposes? While it will be true that we brought back something into existence that technically isn't supposed to exist, it doesn't change the fact that it will be a life form. Point being that it will still have consciousness and feelings like any other animal we have in our animal kingdom. Will they have any animal rights? I know this too far fetched for now.
Wtf kind of animal rights?
I want dinosaurs meat and eggs farms and industrialize this S% at it's maximum like the Hominids we are
his english is so fluent and it’s comfortable to hear him talking because the pronunciations are quite clear
The beauty of Quantum computing. Perhaps not today Michio, but, when we master Quantum Computing (Which by the way, will be in our life time) we will be able to do such tasks. Hmm, the future is going to be very interesting.
intel and ibm and google are already testing it
How do you know that mastering Quantum Computing or even building Quantum Computers usable by the masses is possible in our life time? I'm a Computer Scientist and I don't know that at all. We're making progress, but we've also made progress in other fields at the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress like Nuclear Fusion for more than half a century without working power plants.
What if aliens brought us back, and they are just watching us evolve on this new planet?
True..
And they can live forever as machines
So we will be able to create dragon in near future
Pls no dragons im not looking forward to a dragon burning my house down cause one day a dragon or a creature will get into the wrong hands and be used as a super weapon
Yes but dinosaurs were once real. Dragons are fictional.
+TAZY dragons are real how do you think they were made up huh g
+red lotus korra ???
this is not Game of Thrones or Skyrim lol
Did anyone else get the John Williams score chill at 1:55?
Bringing back Neanderthal Man would be very unethical. Lets start with the animals whose extinction we have caused. Like the Tasmanian tiger.
I would rather us bring back the Neanderthal, but place them on a similar earth like planet. Let them evolve on their own.
Of course it must also be unaware's to them, because they would see us as Gods.
***** dun.. dun..duuuunn.......
***** They can wait a few more hundred years.
I think our species was actually involved with the extinction of the Neanderthal
Sam Littlefield Yep, we hunted them.
We might not have Lions and Tigers for very long, very sad
I think humans are in enough deep shit as it is. We don't need to bring a super predator back into existance :D
Is it possible to bring change in genes in an evolved person,self-actualized to highest potential ??
Even though it would be amazing to have a real-life Jurassic park, I can't help but imagine all of the things that could go wrong. What if the dinosaurs escape and start attacking people? Imagine waking up and seeing a huge T-rex looking into your bedroom window, or a giant Pterodactyl swooping over your head. They talk about mixing all of these dinosaur genes, but in my mind I'm feeling like it could turn out all wrong. What if the dinosaurs turn out to be more dangerous than the original dinosaurs? In the end, a part of me would love to see a real dinosaur, but the risks might outweigh the benefits.
It would never happen. The dinosaurs lived in a much more oxygen rich environment than we have today, which has a crucial role in the sense of how big animals and mammals can get. If we could hypothetically clone dinosaur dna, the dino would either die prematurely, or grow to a much smaller size.
Josh Wooten Or possibly develop a new type of animal we haven't witnessed yet. Go go Power Rangers!
Josh Wooten Yeah, I thought about that too. You never know, though, they might be able to create something really dangerous.
Omar Khalil I'm aware of that, but even though we have weapons I'm pretty sure a dinosaur could still do a lot of damage and it would probably take a long time to kill one because of their size.
Omar Khalil Yes, that would be stupid. I don't think they would build it near where people are, but I was thinking if they escaped and made it near where people live then that would be scary.
Could you do this with people? Bring back Einstein or Elvis Presley.
Elvis was a pedo and a rapist
They're not talking about bringing back a *specific* individual dinosaur, but dinosaurs or mammoths as a SPECIES
"Life finds a way"
You scientist were so concerned with whether you could, you never stopped to think about whether you should.
I need dinosaurs please it's so cool
In the future you wont have to work (machines do everything), and ull be surrounded by super hot lover robots, they will look back at us and laugh and say hahahah poor bastards. In-fact this very comment will be used as the ultimate irony generator but fortunately I'll be long dead and avoid the humiliation!
You think that scientist created a robot that said loud and clear i want to wipe out the human race and it said that in front of thousands upon thousands of people you probably dont want a terminator stage
It would be more ethical to bring back the animals we killed like the Thylacine, Moa Bird, & Stellar's Sea Cow.
I'm not sure resurrecting anything is entirely ethical.
I was thinking about the "shape". How do you get body structures of pre historic animals? And then he explained it at the end.
While the scientific implications are really fascinating, I would strongly advice against messing with human ancestors (even those on a different evolutionary branch). That would raise a host of ethical problems, such as the line between animal and human (at what point do we grant a living thing the same rights and duties assigned to humans). It would be scientifically be of enormous value however to recreate extinct animals or plants, in order to better understand history and evolution. There may be some useful implication for today, assuming genetic engineering would be able to clone our own organs, we could transplant a copy of our damaged organs, avoiding all the problems related to organ rejection. There is only one organ that would not make sense to replace: the part of the brain that defines ourselves.
"line between human and animal". There isn't one.
rlrnilecroc thats true but theres a social line that is very real and would effect how they would be treated
Such Right, but maybe we need to raise that issue to get past religion and how we treat our current fellow life-forms?
bring back Einstein and he shall do resurrect every single dinosaur
We cant even fit more humans in this planet anymore, imagine bring back huge dinosaurs :P
That statement is incorrect. We could fit every person in this entire planet inside the State of Texas and we still wouldn't fill the whole state with our mass.
Charles Fricke
figurative speak..
also fit every one in texas but people cant move or have personal space isnt... fit to how we live.
true that
Sorry, but that's incorrect. There are hundreds if not thousands of square kilometers that are empty and ready to be colonized. In South America for example. The problem is, we like to concentrate in small places and based on that claim that Earth is overpopulated. But few kilometers(or miles if you prefer) from cities there is empty space. Also, many developed countries have very small birthrate. I believe Japan have negative birthrate. So overpopulation is definitely not a problem.
Łukasz Kuczyński
Read the prev comments, it is a figurative speach.
Many places indeed have "room", but we dont live in a single place, we travel, we need buildings... Dinos are HUGE and would destroy just by step in the wrong place if we make then free (as any creature should be).
ever since JP came out when i was a kid, ive always hoped we would bring back a couple dinosaur species. or even the mammoth. although, i hear malcoms voice saying "dinosaurs had their shot but nature selected them for extinction"... seriously though, this type of genetics and cloning could be used to save species we have today that are being killed off by humans
Maybe we should try and save the CURRENT to be extinct animals and THEN try to resurrect the mammoth?
a 50,000 year old mammoth would be historic since the scarcity of the genes..
a 200 year old dead extinct bird will be easy and not historic
primus loy mammoth is coming back tho :P
CPapadakis - Maybe, but that's not what the video was about. Saving the current animals on the extinction list has nothing to do with reconstructing their genes.
CPapadakis But acquiring the means to resurrecting extinct species is the strongest safeguard to the perpetuation of extant species.
I love science if only I was smart in math, I would be a scientist
Find a good tutor like the Khan Academy, and you'll be good in all levels of math.
Michio Kakku? More like Michio Bullcrappu.
I fucking hate science.
I've always believed we couldn't until this video. Now im exited.
well... 10 years have passed and nothing
@@gabrielmarchesy probaly becuase nobody thinks it’s a good idea
i shall try to write an algorithm for such a program
time to learn perl.
oh boy, I can't wait to create my own dinosaur.
well algorithm has nothing to do with what language u r dealing with ... thats the whole point of algorithms
algorithms take care of speed and space requirements independent of programming language.
learn some computer shit head.
askadetra do you want to know how? or do you jus wanna know if i can do that?
its a waste of time and computer.
Why not resurrect Woolly Mammoth? Dodo? Stellers Sea Cow? you've seen jurassic park right? i know its cool but what would those big giant lizard do to this generation. -,-
it's not a lizard
I wanna ride my pet TRex of the future NOW
lol
Kids....
lol you think it would be about 5$ like a toy from your local Toys R Us ?
Yea and be its lunch as payment for the ride
We don't need to clone dinosaurs, we have Hillary Clinton.
BRING BACK THE FUCKING DODO BIRDS PLEASE
Bingo! Dino DNA!
I want a pet Compy!
A compsignathus? I want one too!
i want a pet turk-i mean velociraptor
Pet Suchomimus.
Very interesting and exciting for the future
This is CRAZY!!!
We have a series of movies to tell us why this is a bad idea.
+Michael Crockett We have a series of movies about dinosaurs with plucked feathers. Poor things...that must have hurt.
you do know I think with the correct security we would be able to have dinosaurs and let the public see them and in jp1 the fences were ridicules but if we use the correct things like the JW enclosures I think it would be safe the only reason that happened becuase they didn't think Dino's were enough
+Michael Crockett Because its more exciting when things go wrong. In reality we would have control.
OR PUT THEM ON A FUCKING ISLAND
*BLUE*
you keep asking the question of: "could we?" you haven't stopped to ask the question: "should we?"
MrJamesLongstreet
some things we shouldn't do and i'm not stating that to be a prick. its like we have nukes and we could use them, but should we use them? sure different situations may call for their use but is that the only way? within the context of this video i was mostly quoting one of the characters from Jurassic Park. just because we can resurrect the dinosaurs should we bring back all of them or just a few? or any of them at all? what would happen to our ecosystem if we did? just because i can kill a guy doesn't mean i should
H.M. Murdock Im sure they are talking about bringing them back to study and learn, not make a freaking park or release them to the wild, plus if you read the book Jurassic Park, the whole place was a clusterfuck right from the get go
***** true, but you can't control everything, especially when it comes to unpredictable animals
H.M. Murdock there are sedatives and other ways of controlling creatures
*****
but how much sedative should we give a creature that's been dead for thousands of years and has no real close relatives we can test on?
Great video!
I'm more than a little confused as to why someone who worked on the failing field of string theory a few decades ago is given the authority to comment about all fields of science at all scales and in all instances, as though what he has to say is any more valid than anyone you'd find on the street.
Great point Stan.
So former physicists tend to make shit up?
***** So? If they took any animal biologist off any university campus, they would give a more informed view than a former string theorist. And having worked with them, I can tell you the answer is a resounding "no", not even "in theory". That's not how genetics works, and that's not how evolution works.
You don't have to believe me. I won't tell you what my profession is. But I have just as much credibility as a former string theorist on matters of biology even if I had no credentials whatsoever. But DNA does decay. Neanderthal DNA has been recovered and analyzed from tens of thousands of years ago, highly fragmented and piecemeal. Imagine what DNA would look like after 65,000,000 years for dinosaurs. It just doesn't make sense. You can't 'recover' DNA like an old deleted file. Once it's gone it's gone. Tell me where the genetic information is supposed to come from after the DNA has disintegrated?
*****
That's a question of whether or not enough of it exists to fill the gaps. That's 'theoretically possible' but still very far-future stuff, and nobody would fund it.
Jurassic park Shows us how BAD this idea is. But it still would be cool to see dinosaurs walking on earth again.
There is a huge difference between the methods that Jurassic Park uses to get dinosaurs and the method that Dr. Kaku specifies. In Michio Kaku's example we would control the characteristics and qualities of a new being to create something that looks like a dinosaur. In this fashion we will be able to alternate how smart the creatures are, how they think and process the world, or even make them docile herbivores if we choose. I doubt, if we had control over a computer that created these, that we would make monstrous creatures that outsmart and eat us.
Oh okay that makes sense
Hasret Alija Also bear in mind the environment has changed greatly, including the atmospheric quality, It's lifespan would probably be very short due to the different air quality which is, to be frank, bullshit compared to what it once was long, long ago. also what it would eat and digest wouldn't live any more... it would be a tragic life for the thing.
Jurassic park was destroyed because of the fat guy
Jake Zephyr That's exactly what the characters of geneticist Dr. Wu and John Hammond presumed too. However, in the end their lack of discipline with newly founded genetic power (potent in itself) proved their downfall. We're talking about animals that went extinct 65 million years ago; our lives are a mere blink of an eye in the history of this world. The idea of 'controlling' such creatures with computers seems unethical and precarious anyway. Also, animals escape all the time from their holding pins in zoos. It's not uncommon to hear about the occasional pig or the moose running around out of their cages.
The point is, life is a force that is so adaptive and complex that attempting to control it will yield disastrous results. This is because life in inherently unpredictable and chaotic. Science tells us how to create such creatures, but it doesn't tell us if we should.
I don't understand how Mr Kaku is qualified to answer such questions. This is a bio question, and he specializes in astrophysics. The two fields bare nothing in common.
If you watch his lectures about the future, he says he has interviewed something like 100 scientist in all fields about what they think the future will be like and what is possible in the future with technology. So yes he does say that he has studied in a certain field of physics, but he took the info he got from all these other scientists, and has put all this info in various books he has written and in his lectures he gives.
hes a professor of theoretical physics at a prestigious university, its his job to be up to date on the latest advancements in science
***** Well actually, no he's not. Its not his field. In theoretical physics he would most certainly kick my butt to the moon and back. In other topics, where he is not a qualified professor, his knowledge would be limited. He would not have the time to read journals and be up to date with the scientific literature in that field. Believe me it is bloody hard to do that for just one topic. Let alone the range of topics Mr Kaku comments on.
Correct....you want to understand? He's a "science personality"..that is why they have him commenting on any general science. people like watching/hearing him.
***** Good at ___ physics. A PhD in biology is more knowledgeable about biology than Kaku I will assume... when he talks about general science topics it is because he is a personality not because he is an expert.
Why the living FUCK would we want to bring back a T-Rex? I don't wanna be sleeping one day in my bed and wake up to see a T-Rex and go "oh hey buddy, mind not eating me?"
Michio Kaku as a Dad.
Son: Dad why is my penis smaller than all the other kids?
Michio Kaku: Well son...That has to do with genes! Genes tell our body how to make all its proteins. Some genes are instructions for proteins that regulate the activity of other genes. Such 'control genes' govern important events in the developing
Son interrupts Dad: It's because we are Asian isn't it!?
Wheres that T-Rex at allready!? C'mon you had SIX years!!!
We..the T-Rex fan community.., are very patient people, but enough is enough!!!
There should be like a dino-race between Russia, USA, and China!!! Instead of the silly arms race currently going on leading to 0 dino's so far..
We the fans demand action.., and im pretty sure 'the rastafarian lobby' stands with us on this one!!
Ps. A really cool chicken could allso do. Until better solutions are found!!
In their defense the DNA IS 66.000.000 years old. Have YOU ever cloned anything with THAT old DNA!? No? Didn't think so! Saying they have never existed seem pretty far out. After all the bones collected by archeologist worldwide... They all in on a big scam.., and not ONE has come forth with it.., that's what you are saying? :)
Im not saying im sure of anything. But currently i find the evidence provided by the paleontologist to be more credible, than what i have seen from conspiracy theorists in this matter!?
Everyone can throw out a claim with nothing other than words and homemade videos to back it up...
Search ' the rastafarian lobby'... You remind me of that guy!
an elephant give birth to a elephant, why not make a chicken give birth to a dinosaur?
Compys. You could take compy DNA, fertilize a chicken egg, and bam! Baby dinosaur.
Flowey The Flower first we have to get enough DNA before you say bam and most of it is already gone so the better method is to activate the DNA of a chicken so that it grows teeth ++++++
This man!! XD blows my mind everytimeXD
Do we have any flat part of Jesus's body in any of the relics? it would be fun to bring him back to life, maybe we could see if he really had superpowers or not
Well although I don't believe in the supernatural the first explanation to a clone not having superpowers would have to be the idea that it is not genetic nor physical, just a knowledge of how to manipulate "supernatural forces"
It's the holy spirit that made him "supernatural",not a body...Don't play with such things
I hope you get well soon
ektasp Because there ain't no such things *Grabs Popcorn*
Omar Khalil
:))
The great creator has animals go extinct for a reason...
BulletFilms33 It was an accident mate. An asteroid doesn't smash into the world for a reason !
what reason did it have to create cancer and small pox.
Gordon Fredrick Agreed.
Gordon Fredrick Technically, it only seems to us observers to have been an accident, for nature, objective and blind to subjective attributes, just happens--neither accidentally nor intentionally. Nature just "is".
Everything happens for a reason, that's a quote that is true every time. Think about it, if dinosaurs weren't extinct we wouldn't be here right now, they could've evolved into bigger and more dangerous creatures. Humans would've never survived in such a harsh environment. The universe is programmed by the almighty creator. Everything that has or will happen can be explained simply because it was programmed to do so.
So I have a question if there are genes in our bodies that are turned off since nature doesn't get rid of anything is there genes in our body that hasn't yet been turned on and can we turn them on as well as turn genes off?
i love this man he's so smart but not patronising
Love to listen his talks
At 1:25 Michio Kaku states, "Dinosaurs perished 65 million years ago, not tens of thousands of years ago. However, something had happened that I never thought would happen in my lifetime, and that is that we have soft tissue from the dinosaurs".
However, the more logical conclusion would be that perhaps the purported 65 million years is wrong, and the soft tissue proteins never survived for all those millions of years, but the cataclysmic event that killed off the dinosaurs is within the memory of man ... I'm surprised that a genius like Michio Kaku cannot see such an obvious corollary.
This video was nearly 9 years ago, and he says we clone animals.. so u telling me human cloning is not possible in 2018 almost 19
GREAT SCOTT! Doc brown will you just keep focusing on time travel please?
when the day come, I wanna be T-Rex whisperer and do a tv show just like Cesar Millan
This is truely amazing when dinosaurs and neanderthals back in to life in the future
There is already the experience of what happens with "clones" made from some "re-juveniled" adult cells. The cloned sheep. They won't live very long and may suffer from various diseases - by occurring imperfections just because it is the case in an adult cell, having already experienced many many re-generations of itself, which causes errors in the genome by nature, and also, adult cells are differentiated cells, not primary fetal cells which still can specialize into any kind of cell lateron. The piece of art is for a real mammal to be re-created with normal usual life expectancy is that we have to get hands on native fetal primary cells. Root cells. These are NOT cells which are taken from somewhere off a living mammal or from fossiles. So where to get Neanderthal primary cells resp. undifferentiated DNA, or dinosaur primary cells. This is obviously hard to find, especially in withered fossils. What to find: hermetically encapsulated, air-free, unwithered, well-cooled, undamaged root/primary DNA from somewhere. Antarctica ? This is world's coldest refrigerator as we know so far. Maybe northern Sibiria or north-Canadian permafrost areas as well.
We shouldn't be playing around with genetics like this. We need to leave the past in the past. In the famous words of Ian Malcom, "Dinosaurs had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction."
Nature?A giant asteroid?
This may sound stupid but can u remake a dinosaurs exintion with out killer us
I think this is so amazing, scientist are actually expecting a baby Mammoth in 2016, and dinosaurs in 10 years. Pretty hype rn
Hi, Im from 2020. Still no Mammoths nor Dinosaurs. But we do have a new virus...
He told me exactly what I wanted to hear
and can we prevent the loss of many species every day? including reptiles?