ResearchHub - The future of science publishing and funding? - Cole Delyea

In this discussion i spoke with Cole Delyea, a fellow youtuber ‪@InvestigateExploreDiscover‬ , with a background in immunology. However, here we discuss Cole’s involvement with ResearchHub - a platform that is changing the way in which scientific research can be accessed and funded, as you will shortly find out.
ResearchHub - www.researchhub.com/
Follow Cole's progress - www.researchhub.com/hubs/lett...
Find me on Twitter - / eleanorsheekey
Support the channel
through PayPal - paypal.me/sheekeyscience?coun...
through Patreon - / thesheekeyscienceshow
TIMESTAMPS:
Intro - 00:00
ResearchHub - 01:30
Independent Science - 10:00
Funding science - 17:30
Peer review - 22:30
Future of science publishing - 25:00
Reputation - 30:00
Please note that The Sheekey Science Show is distinct from Eleanor Sheekey's teaching and research roles at the University of Cambridge. The information provided in this show is not medical advice, nor should it be taken or applied as a replacement for medical advice. The Sheekey Science Show and guests assume no liability for the application of the information discussed.

[@kingsize1182]

Yoh, this episode was 🔥🔥🔥. Sheekey is so BADA$$. Big Ups and Respect.

[@thefruit]

your show is improving quality wise episode per episode, keep up the grind!

[@joemoya9743]

Nice interview and interesting study regarding music and plants. But, I noticed you weren't sure about its economic impact. Like a lot of research, the economic viability is a crucial aspect of this type of study. And for that to be true, the use of music will be dependent upon the valued added provided by music. This value added can be based on the plant growth increase as a unit of mass per unit of electrical cost to generate music plus capital cost of music source. This difference would result in something like kg/kw. However, this also needs to be converted to dollars to determine economic benefit. An example of this would be an ROI like Market Dollar Net Value of additional Kg produced (i.e., Net Revenue) divided by costs (electrical cost plus capital costs). I think this would be an important aspect of the research. Without this part, you have an interesting result rather than a result that has shown (or not) the impact of your study on economic productivity.

[@thefruit]

I feel like if plants grew faster through sound, cannabis growers would have aleady figured that out by accident 😅 but who knows 😮
maybe classical music excited the (academic upper class) researchers so much, so that the CO2 in the lab increased. resulting in faster grow rates :)

[@newyorkskier]

Too bad you are not putting out as many real science shows. I loved your shows because it had a lot of science to it and had less BS. I miss them

[@TheSheekeyScienceShow]

I've been keeping it lighter as I have been finishing my PhD but more detailed content on the horizon