In this video we take a look at the graphical differences between The Last of Us on PS3 versus The Last of Us Part I remake on PS5. #thelastofus #gaming #playstation
Arguably beyond them, given that a lot of the "before" shots are pre-rendered video, and the actual gameplay often ran well below 30 frames a second. Not that I minded at the time.
The one note that I got from this video is that the PS3 version still holds up quite well to this day. Sure there's a lot of harsh lighting in that version but this was almost a decade ago. If anything, it just makes a good thing even better
I'm glad Annie Wersching got to see her portrayal of Tess on modern day tech before her sad and untimely passing last week. She was also in one of my favorite TV shows, "The Rookie". RIP Annie.
It’s because the remake traded the cartooney, stylistic art direction for photorealism. The color grading is artificial, but that’s what gave it its charm
Came here to say this,the color grading adds so much to the mood and emotion of the scene, some parts of the ps3 game although less impressive graphically, look much more appealing than in the remake
No its not but i agree color scheme can affect the vibes@hayax The charm came from the acting the animation quality the sound design and many other more important things before wasn't even cartoonist it was just of the time
I absolutely can't believe how well the original holds up. Beautiful game all around. That being said, I'm currently playing the remake and it's just on another level. I would say it's in my top 5 for best looking games I've ever played. There have also been some very minor gameplay changes with the AI and some of the controls (it plays almost identical), but those slight tweaks just make the QoL so much better. It's kind of hard to explain, but makes for a much more satisfying playthrough that I felt the original was lacking when I went to replay it. I would hold off for a sale though. If you're new to the game, then maybe get it now. The game is worth it, but 70 bucks is a hefty price tag for a decade old game that has cut content
@@norvinzor I literally said the remake is on another level of quality. I even said they improved the gameplay. It's so much nicer. Just hard to justify the price. And I was praising the original game for looking so good on hardware that's 16 years old now. I never bashed the remake or took anything away from it. Simply stated the price is a little steep
I think the bolder red and black for Ellie's signature shirt and sleeves is better on the ps3 too, the way the colors hit on the ps3 are still so beautiful
Dude yes! Thank you, when they showed that sprawling City shot, the transition from the PS3 graphics to the PS5 it somehow looked like they took away detail. They just added a bunch of fog and smoke and Haze and they removed more of the city somehow I couldn't believe it
Idk, also the lighting effect from the ⛈️ at 3:26 does something for me too. It feels more like a Minecraft storm aesthetic than whatever the dying fluorescent light bulb effect that is the PS5 version turned out to be.
Absolutely mind blowing that the original ran on a PS3. I'm fairly certain the PS5 is far more capable than what this remake is showing us. Especially in the gameplay department.
I 100% agree with you, the lighting was much "softer" and the characters were "stylized", it had lowkey a "cartoon aspect". The hyper realism of Part 1 doesn't fit with the story of the game, it take away the magic from it imo!
Love the look and realism of the remake. The original release on the PS3 was absolutely mind blowing back then. Seeing this remake and how realistically aged and weathered the survivors look is next level. The price tag on the other hand is what is stopping me from buying this for the PS5.
Kinda wish they didnt take away that warm orange tint the game had with some lights, it gave it a nice embrace in non combat explorations. The remake kind of took too much from the grim washed out colors of part 2
That's what I thought too, I loved the original warm colors of the game especially in the church at Bills town or in the streets after you escape the sewers. But I guess the colors of the remake represent the story better ... It's a harsh grim world where the story's is set and maybe they thought 'so should be the colors'.
There is a diffence that is really nice but it just isn't £70 nice especially when the original looks so good and still feels good to play. This just doesn't have enough to justify the price. I would have preferred they just made something new.
@@mikesaintjulesmusic Exactly man, I mean, Nintendo pulled the same thing with Xenoblade Chronicles: Definitive Edition, and no one seemed to bat an eye. Still, there are people who bought it full price for PS3, then again for PS4 a year later, so I can understand where some people are coming from.
The graphics quality jump across generations is so palpable here you can almost touch it. It's awesome to see such comparison, and I'm glad they re-released in for PS5. PS3 version looked stellar at the time and pushed PS3 to its limit but it still looked like a video game. The PS5 remake is only few steps from photorealism
You gotta remember that comparing cutscenes is not really an accurate comparison here as the original and remaster cutscenes were pre-recorded videos and the remake is real time rendering. Still the in-game graphics on the PS3 holds up remarkably well for an almost 10 year old game! Kinda puts into context how much of a technological achievement the game was when it launched on the PS3.
For someone like me who only played this once on PS3, I'm very much looking forward to this remake! That said, I'm waiting for a sale. $70 is wayyy too much for a graphical upgrade
@@killaaks6165 Last of us remastered, which is conveniently locked at 4k to 30fps on ps5. I am convinced remastered at 4k60p on ps5 would look better than this in either graphical mode.
@@salutations6370 Not sure if you understood my point. Remastered on PS5 could have easily been unlocked to run at 4k60p. It would have looked and played amazing. They never did it, instead they remade it. The remake doesnt run at 4k60p either. They have added too many effect to what the ps5 can handle at comfortably at 4k60p. It will look worse that remastered would at 4k 60p. im telling you. Ive been playing pc games at 4k60p for years, Anything less than that looks blurry or stuttery.
The PS3 has 256MB of RAM, it's amazing how well the console holds up while running this game. Fun fact: You can plug in a FAT32 USB into one of the ports with an SPRX that runs storage to memory conversion. You can use this to have external RAM running on your console which allows you to run more tasks. For every 32GB of space, you get an extra 500MB of RAM (750MB on a PS3 if running HFW or CFW basically).
All in all I’m very impressed. Watched a whole play through of a remake and I’m astonished at how they improved the scenes, especially the backgrounds to some of the levels. It looks how it did in my head when I was a teen and played it on the ps3.
I honestly like the look of the original better overall, but the water in the remake looks fantastic. They also focus on showing more of the eyes in the remake which allows some more emotionality.
Looks nice but not paying $70 for a game I’ve already played and it also doesn’t have multiplayer. It will eventually be available on PlayStation Plus.
same finished 8 times remastered version and bad part, i don't have a ps5 is weird they release part 2 for ps4 but they can't release this remake too for ps4
Looking at these side by side the PS3 version draws my attention more. The PS5 version is visually better but maybe too polished I don't know. Somehow the PS3 version world looks more run down and dingy. If I had a PS5 I would want to play it but not for $70 of a game I played twice on PS3 and once on PS4.
The graphics look better, but with the moving parts and all together I kinda like the charm of the ps3 version more. There's something about the art direction that melds better.
The ps5 obviously has a little more texture detail and seems to be higher res but I prefer the more greyish lack of colour in (some) scenes or characters in the ps3 version. It gives a more moody atmosphere, almost like an old 70s movie. That's the problem with so called upgrades, sometimes the choices made to enhance really have the opposite effect as the developers end up thinking far too hard. Overall though both are good, but the jump between generations shows far less improvement than the generations that have come before, and the little things are starting to become more important these days anyway (character ai and animations in particular). The developers need to remember they are making games and not movies
@@skipperdipper5186 they have one 'big' team that's staggering work loads. They've mostly been working on part 1 while keeping factions on the back burner
I just played this for the first time on PC and to say I'm blown away is an understatement. One of the best games I've ever played in my life and I've been gaming since Pong. the story is really heart wrenching at times
I guess what the original lou upholds the atmospheric vibes that coincides with the individuals' personality. Like the harsh red tint of bill's town like his harsh straightforward personality.
Maybe it's just nostalgia, but I still prefer the original art/style. Tess for me was always a more intriguing character because she was younger. And for that price it should have included multiplayer as well ..
@Connor RK800 the original design to me could still be late 30 or 40 dead on. If they meant it or not I found the character design more intriguing and looks like she could have handled herself better and made me wonder what made her such a badass what had she gone through to turn her that way at that age.. now just seems to have tipped to far into the older direction, for me anyway
@@snake1024 you found her hot. This is all. Now she Looks Like her Age and you dont find her hot anymore. Man's Always Like Young looking Women and you are normal for that... But still a pervert
Agreed on both. 1. The visual upgrades are top notch as usual for ND but playing the ps3 and ps4 versions multiple times, watching multiple playthroughs, for so many years... im so use to how they all originally looked. I'd have preferred they added the characters details but not change their looks. 2. With the way ND handled Lost Legacy not being a new engine developed game they made it a point to not charge full price... so I am a bit surprised at the full price of this which doesnt include the multiplayer.
This is a perfect example of the difference between graphics and visuals. The Ps5 graphic are incredibly more advanced than ps3, but there is little difference in the feel as it the same visuals. It incredible really what dev achieve and sometimes we take for granted. Proof that graphics are not a sign of a great game, or that a great game needs the best graphics.
@@The_Ostrich I don't think I have explained myself very well. The intention was more to commend the ps3 version. The PS3 version is made on 16 year old technology and still looks good. I can see there is a difference between the two, but honestly if a game had the intention of styling their game like the ps3 version I would not be upset with those graphics, I think it still looks great. Blind testing, if I had to guess which was which, or which one I preferred I would find it tough to pin point it! I think there are merits and demerits to both versions. But that might be, as you say, my old eyes and I might need glasses.
Graphics are still everything for a great game to have a story to its fans being a already great fans that needs all in one . You play a story mode game your gona see cutscenes and are Gina wanna see cutscenes that look lord like so graphics somewhat do matter on top if the game being good itself . This is the most times gamete will care about graphics in a story mode game then online multiplayer worrying about graphics over multiplayer wheh gameplay would then matter most
I agree with you, the little details in the ps3 version makes a big difference, the lighting and the feel of the atmosphere. You can’t beat that with (only) better graphics. That being said I havn’t play the remake yet so i can’t judge it, but from the looks of it, it does kinda feel different..
@@Coltonflix910 haha just lucky enough to score one fast enough from scalpers but havent really touched it since last month since there isnt much exclusives to play :p
Aside from Tess looking a bit better, I prefer everything of the original.....it looks and fits better in a artistic way imo...remake is pushing graphics for graphics sake and it losses some.of the charm and grime of the original. Thanks but no thanks here
Old vertion actually has alot better and more interesting lighting. Nice high key contrast with faces party in shadow. New vertion is kinda... to clean... and that makes it les realistic. Take a lok at the lighting on some of those super photo real UR5 trailer, harsh lighting has alot to do with it looking real.
saying the remake is in anyway “less realistic” is a laughable claim. It takes an insane amount of copium to start defending the ps3 lighting with ridiculously crushed blacks and terrible color accuracy
@@lotus2001 Man, are you in a visual arts school? Because if you did you would understand perfectly the difference between perfect graphics and perfect visuals
@@infrunaya Might not be. I preferred the PS4 remastered to PS3 because of better textures. But I don't like the hyper realism look on PS5. Also a dramatic story like The Last of Us looks better in a cinematic 24ps look. I think the obsession with hfr has gone too far.
@@ryanthomas2432 Then buy it , And see TLOU becoming the 2nd GTA5 with the heavy amount rockstar has milked it and Now its lost its reputation. Good luck
Ps3 version/ps4 still looks amazing. I just see a $70 price for a little upgrade in the graphics. This new generation not going to have alot details but add more ray tracing and realistic shadows.
@@im.weasel bro even GTA V doesn’t cost $70🤣 Also it has released every time with its online features as well You really shouldn’t use GTA V as an example
As an artist in the game industry for 25 years - I can assure you that this is a LOT more than a 'little' upgrade. Every single asset has been re-worked. That's literally years of work. I'm not saying it's worth full-price - but there's no way this can be considered a 'little' anything.
The animation in this remake are better than ever! I love the more emotions and details put in their faces and I know a lot of people hate Tess’ new face but for me, I like the ways she looks in the remake than In the original
Yeah, I agree about Tess, she looks better in the remake Btw, that's how I remembered her when playing the original game. I was surprised when I saw how young she looked in comparison with how I used to remember her. The new look fits better
I love the original but once you see the remake it's kinda hard to go back. I really like the new animation. I also feel like the new character design fits their voices better, if that makes sense.
I'd pick the authentic PS3 version every time. Not everything needs updating, especially if it's made to look old & battered. It's truly an incredible game. I'm just about to complete it & I'm enjoying so much (like the Uncharted games) I don't care about platinuming it. I see there's a "Part Two" that was released so I'm looking forward to see how the rest of it goes.
Is it me or sometimes the old PS3 version looks better? more visually appealing? they really didn't need to remastered this game yet again, just a patch of the already remastered PS4 version to make it run at 4K 60fps on PS5 would be enough, they just want that money.
@@ashwilkessy4766 I think the PS5 could run the PS4 remaster at 4K 120fps with a patch but nope they chose to remaster it even further throwing that out the window and charge $70 without even having the multiplayer.
Haha Exactly my feelings about graphics...they have evolved but nothing to the degree in which they did back in the good ol days ....from ps2 to ps3 from Xbox to Xbox 360....those were the days 🤩 Most games just disappoint me these days...make em look pretty automatically gets 9s or 10s ....nah....graphics aren't everything.
That PS3 Cell architecture is no joke if only developers knew how to use it so well maybe there may be better looking games for the PS3 running at 1080P 60HZ.
I read somewhere Cell architecture had a reasonable rationale behind it: ps2 had lots of dedicated units for each stage of a game: graphics, sound, logic, etc. For ps3, Sony designed one chip with a few exceptionally fast units, so it could perform every of those roles in one chip, except for graphics. If ps3 only had a better memory layout and good dev tools from start, we might have be playing with some interaction of Cell today.
The graphics of the new version obviously look a tonne better, but some of the art direction and visual style (such as the lighting) looks a lot better in the original
Nah. There's nothing at all in the original that looks better (not even as good as actually) than Part I remake. Everything about Part I remake looks vastly superior to the original. Looks way better than the remaster on PS4 Pro, too.
This was exactly my thought. Obviously the graphics are far superior, with more polygons and whatnot, but I much prefer the original art direction in just about every scene. The new realistic lighting gets rid of the feel of a lot of the areas from the original. And I do not like any of the new models over the originals. In Part II, the models looked like the original people but older, which is what happens as you age; certain features about you change. But these new models are reverse-engineered from the Part II models, meaning they tried to bring the older-aged faces to the younger characters, and it just looks...off to me.
I am amazed how well it still holds up against my PS3 and PS4. I really thought I was remembering it better than it was, but no it was great back then and looks great even now. (That never happened with my Atari 2600 or Nintendo. lol
@@olzzon Totally agree. Its like with modern games they are adding a lot of effects that actually dont improve the visuals. Some modern games look cartoony or plasticiney. I can't quite but my finger on it.
Im a pc gamer. Ive played this on PS3, PS4, PS4 pro and PS5. I have bought it twice already, I wont be buying this version, I may get the PC version in a few years off cdkeys and mod it. I wont pay more than a fiver for this so may be waiting a while. Not really too fussed.
@@MaryMeKo i dont plan to buy it. Ive beaten it like 3 time and the graphics aren't blowing me away. Ill wait for the pc release when it is super cheap
Thanks for this comparison. The Ps3 original still looks amazing. I'm not gonna buy the remake. But I'm so hyped now I'm gonna just play the Ps3 original again.
I brought it and I’ve played the original, but now that I have a ps5 I want to play it on next gen. I think i will play part 2 again as well! All on the hardest difficulty.
Imagine playing it back PS3 and NG+, then does it again in PS4 Pro remastered and NG+, now this w/ only graphical changes not like the game isnt a linear derivative titles for 70$
@@kiddfromla you do know that’s not the case for everywhere right? For example its $85 USD here in Australia but you don’t see me going around telling people that the game is $85 do you?
As someone who hasn't played this game before, I really prefer the PS3 version. Yes, the character models and high fid textures are obviously better on PS5 but the lighting in the original feels so much better. Ray tracing is great for realism but the original version's slightly darker tone seems very fitting to me.
It's hard to believe how far the tech behind these games has come in what really is a very short amount of time. Also, thank you for letting that final scene play out through "You're welcome." Such an important moment in the story!
Never played the last of us, so guess im the target audience but gotta say… I like the art style in the old one better. Graphics and art style aren’t the same thing, yeh the ps5 graphics look better.
@@sweetamsterdam Joels face doesnt get as close as the original as it could, he used to look imposing, menacing, mean, now he looks to be between scared and insecure
@@sweetamsterdam the ps3 version has more personality and art design. You can literally see it in comparisons like the swamp scene and the freeway sign with the waterfall. Remake is uninspired.
You wouldn't like to play the PS3 version on modern hardware, 720p/30 looks terrible even on a 108p monitor, never mind the 4K the remake is capable of
The real difference is the in game engine. I was kind of shocked to see how well the original cutscenes still hold up. Makes you wonder how close video game graphics are to be as good as they'll ever get.
Nicely done video. Wow the PS3 version holds up amazingly well against the PS5 version. Even though Cell was a pain for developers it makes me wonder what could have been if Sony had developed the that processor further for another gen.
Absolutely a master piece of a game but even with all the improvements its not worth full price. Doesnt even include the online multiplayer which is a blast!! I will definitely buy it but when the price drops to around half price im not in a rush to play it now, especially after having played it twice already and still remembering everything that happens in the story.
But it's not trying to only appeal to you or the people that's already played the game its more to the people that have ps5 and never played last of us every next gen game nowadays cost the same this wouldn't be any different I see people saying they've already played it once and that's enough so non of them would be all that interested
@@joshuabreeze4005 that can't be it because just owning a ps5 gives you last of remastered, ratchet & clank, infamous second son, uncharted 4, god of war & others for a total of 19 games, as they're part of the ps collection.
@@joshuabreeze4005 id say whoever owned a ps3 and/or ps4 has played tlou and even people who owns a ps5 since tlou remastered was free since day 1 i believe. So for the ones who havent played it is probably 1% of the people who owns a PS console and i dont think ND was targeting the people who havent played this game as they and everybody knows that almost everyone who again, owns a PS console has already played it.
@@MrrNacho but that's just naive thinking you think it's only 1% out of every single person who owned a ps4 or 3 must of played last of us you'd be surprised alot of people switched when ps5 was released the last of us isn't everyone's cup of tea like you think it must be but with it new being next gen and looks great so it appeals more then when it was released in the past
@@joshuabreeze4005 me & his point was just owning a ps5 gives you access to last of remastered, god of war & 19 other games for free. So the new ps5 owners who never had a ps3 or 4 already have the last of us remastered, (which runs 4k/60 on ps5). So the only people left is the 1% of players who don't even play the game when its free, meaning they just aren't interested in playing the last of us.
Even though now there is parity between part 1 and 2, part 1 to me still remains the highlight of the PS360 era and still looks every bit as gorgeous on my 1080p plasma. There is just something about period hardware with a period game that no remaster or remake can touch: My sense with TLOU was that it was a technical marvel that milked everything from the hardware and packed that punch as well in it’s storytelling. The remaster is just the same but with a fresh coat of paint that doesn’t justify its hefty price tag to me because it can never be the original and thus beat that original experience.
Word was expecting gameplay changes like Mafia 1 remake i aint replaying a game for the 5th time when i previously got Vanilla and NG+ then Remaster and NG+ again
I have a top end gaming laptop, runs everything at max settings, 1440p at 100fps+. I'm blown away by it but I remember I went from the wii to the xbox 360 as a kid and couldn't believe the photo realistic hd graphics. 7th gen was a big jump for gaming.
Se compararmos o PlayStation3 e o Xbox360 na época, ambos entregaram muito em termos de configurações. No entanto, hoje em dia, os consoles possuem tecnologia muito mais avançada, mas o que realmente importa para nós, consumidores, é o preço.
true, this only appeals to players who haven't played the original. But this makes me think, if he has a ps5 & still hasn't played the last of us, perhaps he didn't know he already had access to it for free.
imo, the ps5 model for tess suits her voice actor more! i love this game, with or without the remake it will always be one of my favourites. never gets old!!!
I wish we got a little more time with Tess in the Re-remake. My girl dies too early in the original but there's enough story to make you care. Such an amazing game
Well, obviously it looks impressive but I'm not paying half of $70 for that. I'll buy it when it's $15-20, which it probably will in about a year. Or probably less.
Cutscenes are really pretty even on ps3, but I tried playing remastered version on ps4 pro recently after playing TLOU part 2, and it feels very outdated after second part, so I’m very happy I can play it on PC
![The Last of Us Part 1 [Remake] vs Remastered | Direct Comparison](/img/n.gif)
This game really reached the limits of the PS3. It's still beautiful!
Arguably beyond them, given that a lot of the "before" shots are pre-rendered video, and the actual gameplay often ran well below 30 frames a second. Not that I minded at the time.
@@liamness yeah most of theese clips are just pre rendered cutscenes he shoulda showed purely gameplay footage
I still can't believe that it was actually made for ps3. In many ways it looked better than many ps4 games
@@vigintiundecim5301 The lighting and animation certainly felt "next gen" to me at the time
Cell cpu Is the best
The one note that I got from this video is that the PS3 version still holds up quite well to this day. Sure there's a lot of harsh lighting in that version but this was almost a decade ago. If anything, it just makes a good thing even better
lol not really, my ps3 was like a turbo engine and the game was running like dodo
the main difference is alot of these cutscenes were pre rendered fmvs on the ps3, whereas its rendered in real time in engine on ps5.
this game was so impressive to have the graphics it does 9 years ago
Yeah watching this makes me remember just how beastly the PS3 was.
@@DaRkLoRd-rc5yu the cutscenes are pre rendered in game cutscenes you talk like it's cgi pre rendered
I'm glad Annie Wersching got to see her portrayal of Tess on modern day tech before her sad and untimely passing last week. She was also in one of my favorite TV shows, "The Rookie". RIP Annie.
Especially since they tweaked Tess' character model to look like Annie.
Wait she died! That’s so sad what happened?
Rest in peace
24 is my favorite show, she was on that too 😢
RIP :(
I do love the visual fidelity of the remake, but the original had such great color grading.
It’s because the remake traded the cartooney, stylistic art direction for photorealism. The color grading is artificial, but that’s what gave it its charm
Ps5 version is like warm mode and ps3 is on cool mode and better view
Came here to say this,the color grading adds so much to the mood and emotion of the scene, some parts of the ps3 game although less impressive graphically, look much more appealing than in the remake
No its not but i agree color scheme can affect the vibes@hayax
The charm came from the acting the animation quality the sound design and many other more important things before wasn't even cartoonist it was just of the time
I absolutely can't believe how well the original holds up. Beautiful game all around. That being said, I'm currently playing the remake and it's just on another level. I would say it's in my top 5 for best looking games I've ever played. There have also been some very minor gameplay changes with the AI and some of the controls (it plays almost identical), but those slight tweaks just make the QoL so much better. It's kind of hard to explain, but makes for a much more satisfying playthrough that I felt the original was lacking when I went to replay it. I would hold off for a sale though. If you're new to the game, then maybe get it now. The game is worth it, but 70 bucks is a hefty price tag for a decade old game that has cut content
Nobody even likes the multiplayer.
@@TheWITE-FOX I LOVED the multiplayer, just it never had people:(
Nah its outdated, stop trying to take away the greatness of the remake, The Remake is 100x better
@@norvinzor I literally said the remake is on another level of quality. I even said they improved the gameplay. It's so much nicer. Just hard to justify the price. And I was praising the original game for looking so good on hardware that's 16 years old now. I never bashed the remake or took anything away from it. Simply stated the price is a little steep
@@TheWITE-FOX I’ve never known someone who even played the online, never tried it lol
The PS3 version has actually aged pretty well
I think it looks better. What?
Im almost certain this is the ps4 version
@@phhh3849 Are you blind?
One can argue that the grittiness of the ps3 version gives it a better atmosphere imo.
Indeed. It is literally the best looking PS3 game ever. The ps4 remaster essentially was just an uprez and framerate boost, and that was enough.
I like the harsh colors in the ps3 better. The grays and blues contrasted with later colors in the game is so cool.
I think the bolder red and black for Ellie's signature shirt and sleeves is better on the ps3 too, the way the colors hit on the ps3 are still so beautiful
Dude yes! Thank you, when they showed that sprawling City shot, the transition from the PS3 graphics to the PS5 it somehow looked like they took away detail. They just added a bunch of fog and smoke and Haze and they removed more of the city somehow I couldn't believe it
Idk, also the lighting effect from the ⛈️ at 3:26 does something for me too. It feels more like a Minecraft storm aesthetic than whatever the dying fluorescent light bulb effect that is the PS5 version turned out to be.
Me too and the over all how the characters look on PS3 and the darker shadows
.. PS3.holds great in here..
Always that one guy. "I like the old version betterrrrrr. Gaga gugu". So play that version and shut your mouth.
i just love the extra detail in the environments in the remake, but both are great!
A remake should be able do to more than just "extra details"
@@bubba418 and it did?
@@MrGister9999 same script and animations for cutscenes
The combat is better as well as the character models and the map.
@@bubba418 it’s almost like it’s the same story
Absolutely mind blowing that the original ran on a PS3. I'm fairly certain the PS5 is far more capable than what this remake is showing us. Especially in the gameplay department.
It isn't really all that mind blowing. Console Generation 7 is when advancement in visual fidelity entered diminishing returns territory.
absolutely....... example : Last of us part II ... that was way too optimized for a ps4 title its mind numbing..
PS3 was a beast and this game proves it.
@@XanderVJ no it is
@@XanderVJ Hardly
The new graphics look better but the old lighting gives off a better atmosphere imo. Sets the tone better for the narrative
not in terms of realism, only in terms of style. You can like it or dislike it, but the remake looks more realistic
@@subzilver That literally has nothing to do with my point.
@@subzilver Realism isn’t always important. Even movies have lighting that isn’t "realistic."
@@bojackhorseman9734 exactly the lighting doesn’t even look that realistic anyways
I 100% agree with you, the lighting was much "softer" and the characters were "stylized", it had lowkey a "cartoon aspect".
The hyper realism of Part 1 doesn't fit with the story of the game, it take away the magic from it imo!
Love the look and realism of the remake. The original release on the PS3 was absolutely mind blowing back then. Seeing this remake and how realistically aged and weathered the survivors look is next level. The price tag on the other hand is what is stopping me from buying this for the PS5.
not a remake
@@8304u Well, it is enough to be different. I think that it just a refined and definitive experience, but it's not considered a remake in my opinion.
@@8304u It's a remake, all of the 3D Models are completely new
@@8304u Character models are uglier, definitely a remake
Don't care about the price, just put Part 1 and Part 2 on pc already I'm gonna pirate it
Kinda wish they didnt take away that warm orange tint the game had with some lights, it gave it a nice embrace in non combat explorations. The remake kind of took too much from the grim washed out colors of part 2
That's what I thought too, I loved the original warm colors of the game especially in the church at Bills town or in the streets after you escape the sewers. But I guess the colors of the remake represent the story better ... It's a harsh grim world where the story's is set and maybe they thought 'so should be the colors'.
@@s4rabii216 both of you haven't experienced HDR in your games.... sadge
@@Miguel_Noether HDR doesn't change the fact that they changed the colours. The cozy orange sun is gone.
Yup I love the atmosphere of the PS3 version at 4:21 & 4:48
There is a diffence that is really nice but it just isn't £70 nice especially when the original looks so good and still feels good to play. This just doesn't have enough to justify the price. I would have preferred they just made something new.
I just feel like if it was a different game like Bloodborne doing this no one would complain about the price tag.
@@mikesaintjulesmusic Exactly man, I mean, Nintendo pulled the same thing with Xenoblade Chronicles: Definitive Edition, and no one seemed to bat an eye. Still, there are people who bought it full price for PS3, then again for PS4 a year later, so I can understand where some people are coming from.
@@FabricioGarcia232 in no way shape or form is Xenoblade comparable with this
Just wait for a price drop and problem solved
@@FabricioGarcia232 bro xenoblade wasn't even on switch, while you can get tlou remastered on ps5
Meh, I'll wait for the PS6 remake remastered version...
😂
😂
I wait gta 5 on ps8
Ps47
Meh. Try being original
I just played through the original again and I’m still amazed. The level of immersion that this game provides is second to none.
I thought the 2013 looked good back then. But the ps5 is just on a different level entirely and I love it.
The graphics quality jump across generations is so palpable here you can almost touch it. It's awesome to see such comparison, and I'm glad they re-released in for PS5. PS3 version looked stellar at the time and pushed PS3 to its limit but it still looked like a video game. The PS5 remake is only few steps from photorealism
Dude I agree with you 100 perfect. It looked absolutely great on ps3 for its time.
@@jackiemortes Count me one of the people who doesn't like photorealism and much prefer the look of the original and the remastered on PS4.
I do too honestly
You gotta remember that comparing cutscenes is not really an accurate comparison here as the original and remaster cutscenes were pre-recorded videos and the remake is real time rendering. Still the in-game graphics on the PS3 holds up remarkably well for an almost 10 year old game! Kinda puts into context how much of a technological achievement the game was when it launched on the PS3.
Yes that was like the pick of gaming.
@@iancruz6617 peak
@@michealjosh737 yea
True
@@double-cheesemcqueeze6315they were tho
For someone like me who only played this once on PS3, I'm very much looking forward to this remake! That said, I'm waiting for a sale. $70 is wayyy too much for a graphical upgrade
if you have a ps5, you already have last of us remastered & 19 other games.
@@killaaks6165 Last of us remastered, which is conveniently locked at 4k to 30fps on ps5. I am convinced remastered at 4k60p on ps5 would look better than this in either graphical mode.
50$ was perfect price
Resident Evil 2 was perfect Remake to pay full price
@@CH-gb7hf not native 4k60
@@salutations6370 Not sure if you understood my point. Remastered on PS5 could have easily been unlocked to run at 4k60p. It would have looked and played amazing. They never did it, instead they remade it. The remake doesnt run at 4k60p either. They have added too many effect to what the ps5 can handle at comfortably at 4k60p. It will look worse that remastered would at 4k 60p. im telling you. Ive been playing pc games at 4k60p for years, Anything less than that looks blurry or stuttery.
The PS3 has 256MB of RAM, it's amazing how well the console holds up while running this game.
Fun fact: You can plug in a FAT32 USB into one of the ports with an SPRX that runs storage to memory conversion. You can use this to have external RAM running on your console which allows you to run more tasks. For every 32GB of space, you get an extra 500MB of RAM (750MB on a PS3 if running HFW or CFW basically).
And what exactly do you gain with this? Just curious.
@@agus.lorenzomore ram
USB 2.0 would hold it back too slow to be even the slowest ram at the time
I played the remastered version on PS4 pretty late , but one of the best experiences ever and didn't really feel like an old game
weirdly, tess looks older, but overall its good, but definitely not worth the price tag.
Well she is in her 40s
A lot of women do without makeup
not as attractive!
@@ryanthomas2432 She doesn't look like she's in her 40s, she looks like she's in her 50s.
@@ProudAchilles Yeah the apocalypse would do that to you
I wish Tess was alive longer in the story. She is a great character
She looks like an old hag in the remake definitely prefer the ps3 version of her
All in all I’m very impressed. Watched a whole play through of a remake and I’m astonished at how they improved the scenes, especially the backgrounds to some of the levels. It looks how it did in my head when I was a teen and played it on the ps3.
I honestly like the look of the original better overall, but the water in the remake looks fantastic. They also focus on showing more of the eyes in the remake which allows some more emotionality.
I also like the original
Looks nice but not paying $70 for a game I’ve already played and it also doesn’t have multiplayer. It will eventually be available on PlayStation Plus.
same
finished 8 times remastered version and bad part, i don't have a ps5
is weird they release part 2 for ps4 but they can't release this remake too for ps4
@@ASSASSIN19923 because PS4 hardware can’t support what you’re seeing from the PS5.
Looking at these side by side the PS3 version draws my attention more. The PS5 version is visually better but maybe too polished I don't know. Somehow the PS3 version world looks more run down and dingy. If I had a PS5 I would want to play it but not for $70 of a game I played twice on PS3 and once on PS4.
Its more gritty. Remastered looks less cartoony too.
The graphics look better, but with the moving parts and all together I kinda like the charm of the ps3 version more. There's something about the art direction that melds better.
The ps5 obviously has a little more texture detail and seems to be higher res but I prefer the more greyish lack of colour in (some) scenes or characters in the ps3 version. It gives a more moody atmosphere, almost like an old 70s movie. That's the problem with so called upgrades, sometimes the choices made to enhance really have the opposite effect as the developers end up thinking far too hard. Overall though both are good, but the jump between generations shows far less improvement than the generations that have come before, and the little things are starting to become more important these days anyway (character ai and animations in particular). The developers need to remember they are making games and not movies
if this was bundled with Part 2 with some kind of ''beta access'' to Factions 2 then I can see why it would cost 70$
75*
I can't believe they spent the past two years working on this instead of factions. It's insane
@@mac2312 They have multiple teams working on different projects
@@skipperdipper5186 they have one 'big'
team that's staggering work loads. They've mostly been working on part 1 while keeping factions on the back burner
@@mac2312 No, they have multiple teams. Just like Team B worked on The Last of Us and Team A worked on Uncharted 3.
The characters in the remake aside from better graphics and ligthing looks much more matured I do get why it's part of the realism
I noticed they do look older in the newer version.
I just played this for the first time on PC and to say I'm blown away is an understatement. One of the best games I've ever played in my life and I've been gaming since Pong. the story is really heart wrenching at times
I guess what the original lou upholds the atmospheric vibes that coincides with the individuals' personality. Like the harsh red tint of bill's town like his harsh straightforward personality.
Maybe it's just nostalgia, but I still prefer the original art/style. Tess for me was always a more intriguing character because she was younger. And for that price it should have included multiplayer as well ..
@Connor RK800 the original design to me could still be late 30 or 40 dead on. If they meant it or not I found the character design more intriguing and looks like she could have handled herself better and made me wonder what made her such a badass what had she gone through to turn her that way at that age.. now just seems to have tipped to far into the older direction, for me anyway
@@snake1024 you found her hot.
This is all.
Now she Looks Like her Age and you dont find her hot anymore.
Man's Always Like Young looking Women and you are normal for that... But still a pervert
Agreed on both. 1. The visual upgrades are top notch as usual for ND but playing the ps3 and ps4 versions multiple times, watching multiple playthroughs, for so many years... im so use to how they all originally looked. I'd have preferred they added the characters details but not change their looks. 2. With the way ND handled Lost Legacy not being a new engine developed game they made it a point to not charge full price... so I am a bit surprised at the full price of this which doesnt include the multiplayer.
I prefer the older graphics too, particularly the character faces. Not really a fan of fog everywhere either. There is such a thing as a clear day.
Same. I feel like I can relate more to tess in the original. She seems like someone I would get along with
The PS3 version holds up incredibly well all things considered
The acting from 6:58 onwards is just amazing. You can literally feel everything
Am I the only one who thinks Test looks better on the ps3
She went from looking late 20s to late 50s
This is a perfect example of the difference between graphics and visuals. The Ps5 graphic are incredibly more advanced than ps3, but there is little difference in the feel as it the same visuals. It incredible really what dev achieve and sometimes we take for granted. Proof that graphics are not a sign of a great game, or that a great game needs the best graphics.
Uhh what... the ps5 version looks a lot better. You need glasses.
@@The_Ostrich I don't think I have explained myself very well. The intention was more to commend the ps3 version. The PS3 version is made on 16 year old technology and still looks good. I can see there is a difference between the two, but honestly if a game had the intention of styling their game like the ps3 version I would not be upset with those graphics, I think it still looks great.
Blind testing, if I had to guess which was which, or which one I preferred I would find it tough to pin point it! I think there are merits and demerits to both versions. But that might be, as you say, my old eyes and I might need glasses.
What I want to know is why are they comparing it to the PS3 version? Why not compare it to the PS4 version?
Graphics are still everything for a great game to have a story to its fans being a already great fans that needs all in one . You play a story mode game your gona see cutscenes and are Gina wanna see cutscenes that look lord like so graphics somewhat do matter on top if the game being good itself . This is the most times gamete will care about graphics in a story mode game then online multiplayer worrying about graphics over multiplayer wheh gameplay would then matter most
I agree with you, the little details in the ps3 version makes a big difference, the lighting and the feel of the atmosphere. You can’t beat that with (only) better graphics. That being said I havn’t play the remake yet so i can’t judge it, but from the looks of it, it does kinda feel different..
The improvements and little details they have added throughout is amazing, but it's not a game I would play again, it is a great game.
Ill probably consider getting it since I've never played the first one but ill wait till the price drops.
@@Hakaisuuu if you haven't played it, it's definitely one of the best games made and a must play, the story is really good.
buy*
@@Hakaisuuu must say you are lucky to Play last of us part 1 On ps5.
@@Coltonflix910 haha just lucky enough to score one fast enough from scalpers but havent really touched it since last month since there isnt much exclusives to play :p
2:48 they just deleted the fire?
I do like the crunchiness of the old one.
i kinda like the blue tint of the original more, it just sets a better tone imo
Aside from Tess looking a bit better, I prefer everything of the original.....it looks and fits better in a artistic way imo...remake is pushing graphics for graphics sake and it losses some.of the charm and grime of the original. Thanks but no thanks here
Colors looking faded
You just say that because you’re nostalgic
@@namedclaiming821 never played the original, i just like a good artstyle
@@namedclaiming821 you know exactly what others think? Wow you must be some kind of psychologist
We should pay $70 for the red dead redemption 2 remake as well! Oh better yet how bout a smooth $120 for the Ghost of Tsushima remake.
Red dead redemption 1 remake*
Old vertion actually has alot better and more interesting lighting. Nice high key contrast with faces party in shadow. New vertion is kinda... to clean... and that makes it les realistic. Take a lok at the lighting on some of those super photo real UR5 trailer, harsh lighting has alot to do with it looking real.
I agree, looking at the new one, the color grading isn’t the same, and the lighting is way more interesting in the first. I was surprised
saying the remake is in anyway “less realistic” is a laughable claim. It takes an insane amount of copium to start defending the ps3 lighting with ridiculously crushed blacks and terrible color accuracy
@@lotus2001 Man, are you in a visual arts school? Because if you did you would understand perfectly the difference between perfect graphics and perfect visuals
I don't know if it's for nostalgia but I prefer the original
Ps3 for me always was the worst version I accept ps4 but 3 no
it's nostalgia
I do too. Better artistic direction will always be superior to better graphics
@@infrunaya Might not be. I preferred the PS4 remastered to PS3 because of better textures. But I don't like the hyper realism look on PS5. Also a dramatic story like The Last of Us looks better in a cinematic 24ps look. I think the obsession with hfr has gone too far.
It isn't nostalgia, the visual storytelling is way better in the original
The only thing this does is help me appreciate more how incredible the original looked for its time.
This shows how powerful the PS3 is
The PS3 is a great system but it’s the past. Overall the PS5 version is a lot better and a huge upgrade in detail and I love it.
this game didnt need a remake its already beautiful and perfect
Clearly not lol
@@Devvo0z You are probably a LOU sheep that will keep buying those games for full price just for a graphical update
"Lol"
@@ProGamer-wj3oj Or just a lou fan?
Make sure you don't buy it then
@@ryanthomas2432 Then buy it , And see TLOU becoming the 2nd GTA5 with the heavy amount rockstar has milked it and Now its lost its reputation. Good luck
I love how much care went into the background details. Can’t wait to download for pc 😭
Absolutely impressive what ND were able to accomplish on PS3 hardware.
Ps3 version/ps4 still looks amazing. I just see a $70 price for a little upgrade in the graphics. This new generation not going to have alot details but add more ray tracing and realistic shadows.
How many times have you bought GTA5?
@@im.weasel once on the xbox 360, got it for free on Playstation 4 and 5.
@@im.weasel bro even GTA V doesn’t cost $70🤣
Also it has released every time with its online features as well
You really shouldn’t use GTA V as an example
As an artist in the game industry for 25 years - I can assure you that this is a LOT more than a 'little' upgrade. Every single asset has been re-worked. That's literally years of work.
I'm not saying it's worth full-price - but there's no way this can be considered a 'little' anything.
@@iconoclasttastic9258 valid point
The animation in this remake are better than ever! I love the more emotions and details put in their faces and I know a lot of people hate Tess’ new face but for me, I like the ways she looks in the remake than In the original
Nice version, but unnecessary 😒
Yeah, I agree about Tess, she looks better in the remake
Btw, that's how I remembered her when playing the original game. I was surprised when I saw how young she looked in comparison with how I used to remember her. The new look fits better
she looks a lot more human, not in the “she used to look like a robot” way, but in a less perfect more natural looking person way
I think the original looks better.
@@NH-tv3jr you have some severe eye disorder then
I love the original but once you see the remake it's kinda hard to go back. I really like the new animation. I also feel like the new character design fits their voices better, if that makes sense.
I'd pick the authentic PS3 version every time. Not everything needs updating, especially if it's made to look old & battered. It's truly an incredible game. I'm just about to complete it & I'm enjoying so much (like the Uncharted games) I don't care about platinuming it. I see there's a "Part Two" that was released so I'm looking forward to see how the rest of it goes.
uh oh...
I don’t know, I think the original still looks better!
Because it's the original version untouched
Yeah its not
@@ryanthomas2432 yes it is
I have to admit on some details. The original is better.
I think it has more charm. Same with Mafia og compared to Mafia de. But that is an opinion lol
3:10 The general lighting of this specific scene here looks way more realistic on the PS3.
@pickyroman Yes.
I more like the colors of the PS3 version
4:21 & 4:48 I much prefer the lighting and atmosphere of the PS3 version
I love the original version of Joel's face.
He looks too sad in the remake instead of angry like the og
Totally agree. Don't even recognize half the people.
FINALLY SOMEONE WHO AGREES😭😭😭😭
@@rubenabajyan4126 well ofc hes sad cause spoilers he lost his daughter
@@indian_crocodile Sadness in men is anger, just look at Ivan the terrible
Is it me or sometimes the old PS3 version looks better? more visually appealing? they really didn't need to remastered this game yet again, just a patch of the already remastered PS4 version to make it run at 4K 60fps on PS5 would be enough, they just want that money.
They've already done that patch a couple years ago
@@killaaks6165 actually it only runs the ps4 pro version which is a choice between 4k/30fps or 1800p 60fps
Gimme the drugs you are smoking please
@@ashwilkessy4766 I think the PS5 could run the PS4 remaster at 4K 120fps with a patch but nope they chose to remaster it even further throwing that out the window and charge $70 without even having the multiplayer.
Haha Exactly my feelings about graphics...they have evolved but nothing to the degree in which they did back in the good ol days ....from ps2 to ps3 from Xbox to Xbox 360....those were the days 🤩
Most games just disappoint me these days...make em look pretty automatically gets 9s or 10s ....nah....graphics aren't everything.
PS3 Tess is more my type. Finer features and no jowl lines.
That PS3 Cell architecture is no joke if only developers knew how to use it so well maybe there may be better looking games for the PS3 running at 1080P 60HZ.
I read somewhere Cell architecture had a reasonable rationale behind it: ps2 had lots of dedicated units for each stage of a game: graphics, sound, logic, etc. For ps3, Sony designed one chip with a few exceptionally fast units, so it could perform every of those roles in one chip, except for graphics. If ps3 only had a better memory layout and good dev tools from start, we might have be playing with some interaction of Cell today.
The graphics of the new version obviously look a tonne better, but some of the art direction and visual style (such as the lighting) looks a lot better in the original
Nah. There's nothing at all in the original that looks better (not even as good as actually) than Part I remake. Everything about Part I remake looks vastly superior to the original. Looks way better than the remaster on PS4 Pro, too.
@@vgnvideogameninja2930 Hmm, i'd say Tess looks more appealing in the original.
This was exactly my thought. Obviously the graphics are far superior, with more polygons and whatnot, but I much prefer the original art direction in just about every scene. The new realistic lighting gets rid of the feel of a lot of the areas from the original. And I do not like any of the new models over the originals.
In Part II, the models looked like the original people but older, which is what happens as you age; certain features about you change. But these new models are reverse-engineered from the Part II models, meaning they tried to bring the older-aged faces to the younger characters, and it just looks...off to me.
Appealing? Tess looks like an actual human being in this remake.
@@cybertrex5649 she is a human in both versions, but a better looking one on the ps3-4 version.
I am amazed how well it still holds up against my PS3 and PS4. I really thought I was remembering it better than it was, but no it was great back then and looks great even now. (That never happened with my Atari 2600 or Nintendo. lol
2:46 As a Boston person, the loss of the Zakim Bridge on the right in the remaster hurts. Was a cool detail to see for a local. :(
I’m in the minority but I think the PS3 looks better. It has more personality. Especially in that swamp scene. This remake feels half-assed.
In terms of graphics, definitely not half-assed, gameplay however, yeah they could have added a dodge button at least
It has a GTA trilogy vibe about it for me. I know it should look better, it just doesn't.
The original version and ps4 has a more of a "feal" to it.
@@olzzon Totally agree. Its like with modern games they are adding a lot of effects that actually dont improve the visuals. Some modern games look cartoony or plasticiney. I can't quite but my finger on it.
The Only winners with this game are Us Pc Gamers we will literally experience this masterpiece for the first time
Im a pc gamer and played this years ago. You missed out on a lot of great games if you only play pc.
I played the PS3 version last year, and still holds up today. No need to buy this if you already played on PS3/PS4
@@skippychurch2965 Most ppl prolly played it on their friend's PS3 so they don't have to buy one.
Im a pc gamer. Ive played this on PS3, PS4, PS4 pro and PS5. I have bought it twice already, I wont be buying this version, I may get the PC version in a few years off cdkeys and mod it. I wont pay more than a fiver for this so may be waiting a while. Not really too fussed.
@@MaryMeKo i dont plan to buy it. Ive beaten it like 3 time and the graphics aren't blowing me away. Ill wait for the pc release when it is super cheap
I just got one question, was that the ps3 version of the game on an actual ps3 or was it being played on a next gen console or PC?
Thanks for this comparison. The Ps3 original still looks amazing.
I'm not gonna buy the remake. But I'm so hyped now I'm gonna just play the Ps3 original again.
I brought it and I’ve played the original, but now that I have a ps5 I want to play it on next gen. I think i will play part 2 again as well! All on the hardest difficulty.
Imagine playing it back PS3 and NG+, then does it again in PS4 Pro remastered and NG+, now this w/ only graphical changes not like the game isnt a linear derivative titles for 70$
75*
@@kiddfromla where’d the 5 come from?
@@Tyreker taxes
@@kiddfromla you do know that’s not the case for everywhere right?
For example its $85 USD here in Australia but you don’t see me going around telling people that the game is $85 do you?
I know right? That's how good it is.
As someone who hasn't played this game before, I really prefer the PS3 version. Yes, the character models and high fid textures are obviously better on PS5 but the lighting in the original feels so much better. Ray tracing is great for realism but the original version's slightly darker tone seems very fitting to me.
I think many have already written this here. But the original still looks so good. The Last Of Us overall as well as part two look so good visually.
Some parts look better on ps5 other parts look better on ps3
For real! this is a pointless remaster, this game has been remastered twice and yet they charge full price
@@alvzcizzler Excuse me but it is a remake not a remaster
Definitely not worth buying at full price .
Dont worry, I dont think you will have to wait too long. Once the fanboys have bought it the price will plummet.
It feels like yesterday i got the last of us on PS3, many so memories i made and how many times i replayed the last of us back in my younger years
It's hard to believe how far the tech behind these games has come in what really is a very short amount of time. Also, thank you for letting that final scene play out through "You're welcome." Such an important moment in the story!
Never played the last of us, so guess im the target audience but gotta say… I like the art style in the old one better. Graphics and art style aren’t the same thing, yeh the ps5 graphics look better.
That is not what art style means. You basically claim to like older graphics with less assets and details.
@@sweetamsterdam Joels face doesnt get as close as the original as it could, he used to look imposing, menacing, mean, now he looks to be between scared and insecure
@@agustindetlefsen6944 in a post apocalyptic world I imagine 20 years of paranoia would get you there.
@@sweetamsterdam the ps3 version has more personality and art design. You can literally see it in comparisons like the swamp scene and the freeway sign with the waterfall. Remake is uninspired.
You wouldn't like to play the PS3 version on modern hardware, 720p/30 looks terrible even on a 108p monitor, never mind the 4K the remake is capable of
The remake is better in every way. Change my mind.
The real difference is the in game engine. I was kind of shocked to see how well the original cutscenes still hold up. Makes you wonder how close video game graphics are to be as good as they'll ever get.
When you have not experienced HDR in your life....🙄
They’ll keep making chips with tens of millions of transistors in them. So… it’ll keep getting more complex.
@@harroldthered7050 Then I guess the question is how close should we get
It'll eventually reach photorealism
Nicely done video. Wow the PS3 version holds up amazingly well against the PS5 version. Even though Cell was a pain for developers it makes me wonder what could have been if Sony had developed the that processor further for another gen.
I can't wait for this game to come out on PC and put mods on it, that's what makes the remake worth it and apparently people seem to forget about it.
Absolutely a master piece of a game but even with all the improvements its not worth full price. Doesnt even include the online multiplayer which is a blast!!
I will definitely buy it but when the price drops to around half price im not in a rush to play it now, especially after having played it twice already and still remembering everything that happens in the story.
But it's not trying to only appeal to you or the people that's already played the game its more to the people that have ps5 and never played last of us every next gen game nowadays cost the same this wouldn't be any different I see people saying they've already played it once and that's enough so non of them would be all that interested
@@joshuabreeze4005 that can't be it because just owning a ps5 gives you last of remastered, ratchet & clank, infamous second son, uncharted 4, god of war & others for a total of 19 games, as they're part of the ps collection.
@@joshuabreeze4005 id say whoever owned a ps3 and/or ps4 has played tlou and even people who owns a ps5 since tlou remastered was free since day 1 i believe.
So for the ones who havent played it is probably 1% of the people who owns a PS console and i dont think ND was targeting the people who havent played this game as they and everybody knows that almost everyone who again, owns a PS console has already played it.
@@MrrNacho but that's just naive thinking you think it's only 1% out of every single person who owned a ps4 or 3 must of played last of us you'd be surprised alot of people switched when ps5 was released the last of us isn't everyone's cup of tea like you think it must be but with it new being next gen and looks great so it appeals more then when it was released in the past
@@joshuabreeze4005 me & his point was just owning a ps5 gives you access to last of remastered, god of war & 19 other games for free. So the new ps5 owners who never had a ps3 or 4 already have the last of us remastered, (which runs 4k/60 on ps5). So the only people left is the 1% of players who don't even play the game when its free, meaning they just aren't interested in playing the last of us.
Even though now there is parity between part 1 and 2, part 1 to me still remains the highlight of the PS360 era and still looks every bit as gorgeous on my 1080p plasma. There is just something about period hardware with a period game that no remaster or remake can touch: My sense with TLOU was that it was a technical marvel that milked everything from the hardware and packed that punch as well in it’s storytelling. The remaster is just the same but with a fresh coat of paint that doesn’t justify its hefty price tag to me because it can never be the original and thus beat that original experience.
wooow ! I love my PS3 more and more ... I was thinking of selling it because it was old, but every time I am convinced that it is a jewel
Wow these animation updates with no combat changes really makes it seem worth $70 for a nearly 10 year old game!
And ps3 looks better artistically in many scenes. They should had remade killzone 2 or motorstorm. What a lousy generation.
@@ottom.3094 CURSES! In The PS3 Version, That one similar as a prototype or unused...
I mean, it's good for people who haven't played the original, and this is on PC.
@@Tabulatelk15 sure, for half the price tag maybe.
Word was expecting gameplay changes like Mafia 1 remake i aint replaying a game for the 5th time when i previously got Vanilla and NG+ then Remaster and NG+ again
PS3 version was ahead of its time.
This thumb bro💀🔥
I have a top end gaming laptop, runs everything at max settings, 1440p at 100fps+. I'm blown away by it but I remember I went from the wii to the xbox 360 as a kid and couldn't believe the photo realistic hd graphics. 7th gen was a big jump for gaming.
WHAT DID THEY DO TO THAT POOR WOMAN?!?
I love Ps3 my teenage
2:05 I like the typo rations distribution center xD
Se compararmos o PlayStation3 e o Xbox360 na época, ambos entregaram muito em termos de configurações. No entanto, hoje em dia, os consoles possuem tecnologia muito mais avançada, mas o que realmente importa para nós, consumidores, é o preço.
I haven’t played this game yet so I’m looking forward to getting this new iteration. Sweet
If you have a ps5 save your money as you already have the remastered version among 19 other games for free.
@@killaaks6165 Or they could buy the definitive version since its their first playthrough
@@ryanthomas2432 Or they could save $70 for the game.
@@killaaks6165 Well they clearly want to play the game and the remake is the best version that they can play it
true, this only appeals to players who haven't played the original. But this makes me think, if he has a ps5 & still hasn't played the last of us, perhaps he didn't know he already had access to it for free.
The ps3 is also looking great 🙌🏻
Lets appreciate that
imo, the ps5 model for tess suits her voice actor more! i love this game, with or without the remake it will always be one of my favourites. never gets old!!!
I wish we got a little more time with Tess in the Re-remake. My girl dies too early in the original but there's enough story to make you care. Such an amazing game
Some games just never die
Well, obviously it looks impressive but I'm not paying half of $70 for that.
I'll buy it when it's $15-20, which it probably will in about a year. Or probably less.
I'm soo glad my first time playing this game was with the remastered version. I had no idea the game was ps3 old.
Cutscenes are really pretty even on ps3, but I tried playing remastered version on ps4 pro recently after playing TLOU part 2, and it feels very outdated after second part, so I’m very happy I can play it on PC