I went unconscious trying to understand consciousness

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @vimohlive
    Support the show at / vimoh
    Make a one-time donation at vimoh.stck.me/...
    Please read these rules before commenting. Follow them to the best of your ability. The rules are meant to keep the comment space clean and a safe space for anyone who wishes to participate in good faith.
    1. No advocating violence of any kind against anyone for any reason. People doing so will get banned from the channel.
    2. No praising or abusing any religion for any reason. Proselytising is not appreciated, nor is making generalised statements about the followers of any religion. People doing so will get banned.
    3. No casteism, racism, or sexism. Discriminatory language will get you banned too.
    4. Trolling, spamming, use of fake accounts to deceive people about your identity, will also get you banned.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 122

  • @thimbaiah9005
    @thimbaiah9005 7 місяців тому +70

    This proves humans ke ancestors ko excessive mental masturbation karne ka kafi shauk tha

    • @amangupta-rz7hn
      @amangupta-rz7hn 7 місяців тому +9

      😂😂aaj bhi hai, debates ko mental satisfaction ke liye kiya jyata tha naki kuch conclusion nikaalney ke liye

    • @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST
      @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST 7 місяців тому

      ​@@amangupta-rz7hn😂

    • @thimbaiah9005
      @thimbaiah9005 7 місяців тому

      @@amangupta-rz7hn Fr

    • @Muktikantag
      @Muktikantag 7 місяців тому

      @@amangupta-rz7hn So true, man!

    • @whoaskedxdegfx
      @whoaskedxdegfx 3 місяці тому

      @@amangupta-rz7hn😂😂😂😂😂 Astik ho ya nastik ladte ye log ha maza hume aata hai 😂

  • @vegaz4966
    @vegaz4966 7 місяців тому +48

    According to his logic universe came into existence when his consciousness came into existence.

    • @Mad_Man888
      @Mad_Man888 4 місяці тому +2

      Yes

    • @Aman-vh7nd
      @Aman-vh7nd 3 місяці тому +1

      Universe ushi k sath pada hua h 😎 😂

  • @shivoesho9638
    @shivoesho9638 7 місяців тому +34

    Ye caller pagal ho gya hai 😂

  • @soutrikchakraborty5211
    @soutrikchakraborty5211 7 місяців тому +23

    I think Vipin is missing a simple point. Objective Reality is what exists, despite no body observing it. We can not see UV or X Ray. Neither did we know about them. But they existed all the same. Doing what they do. If you close your eyes and enter a room. One will only collide with the walls where the walls are. No where else. So, that does entail the existence of something in that place, that activated our sense of touch. That something is defined as Objective reality. No matter how an animal perceives the world. They will agree that the wall exists. They may call it a different name and they may perceive it differently. But they will agree on the existence of the wall. Science is the study of this Objective Reality. And it succeeds in doing so, that is the reason it works. Vipin is advocating for Berkley's Idealism. Which is an extremely regressive idea. Especially when we can take photographs of things when no one is watching. And our detectors measuring things when no one is seeing, and things which can never be seen by us.

    • @shibamcoss
      @shibamcoss 5 місяців тому

      👍

    • @amanpatel6203
      @amanpatel6203 3 місяці тому

      absolutely true

    • @shabirmir9597
      @shabirmir9597 Місяць тому

      X-rays or any invisible forces or energies (to our eyes but visible to sensitive equipment for the detection) have materials as their source so do not match the concept of Invisibility of God being advocated vide cited example. Without matter, at the origin, no such attribute of Invisibility is possible .

  • @premprabhakar1083
    @premprabhakar1083 7 місяців тому +12

    If he dies his conscious dies with him. The reality remains same. In other words if he dies his conscious of his kids dies but not to real kids.

  • @Milindmutuswami
    @Milindmutuswami 7 місяців тому +12

    I don't really know where this comes in Hinduism, I'm sure he's just telling the Philosophy of Plato. His words match a lot with those of Plato...

    • @thebioinformaticsbro785
      @thebioinformaticsbro785 5 місяців тому

      @user-fh7ru2sp5t Advaita Vedanta didn't start with Shankaracharya, but with the Upanishads (ex: Mandukya) that predates Plato and even Buddhism.

    • @mithilbhoras5951
      @mithilbhoras5951 2 місяці тому

      @@Usuebsuushdhiey Yes this is in advaita philosophy. I have only read Atmabodha and Tattvabodha but they do cover an idealistic view of reality.

  • @unlearnwithprasanna
    @unlearnwithprasanna 7 місяців тому +9

    Reality is stranger than fiction, ground reality is stranger than non-fiction. 😂

  • @footballfever09
    @footballfever09 7 місяців тому +9

    According to that guy, consciousness is just solipsism of entire human kind.

  • @Muktikantag
    @Muktikantag 7 місяців тому +5

    Bhai aap bahut sahi jaa rahe ho. My only contention is that you sometimes assume our intelligence is at par with yours, or maybe you just get frustrated and go with the flow when dealing with callers beating around the bush and wasting your time. I do understand that the conversation would have been longer and other callers worth their salt would have unjustly missed their turn, had you let him finish his point just for the sake of it and then destroyed him in your usual brutal manner. All said, I still wanted to hear his point of view; this video would have been more enlightening.

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  7 місяців тому +2

      His point of view was contradictory. What you heard was all there was. He didn't need more time. He had already said it three times

  • @berlinend..4335
    @berlinend..4335 6 місяців тому +2

    Caller is in game simulation word😂

  • @gungunidhoop5942
    @gungunidhoop5942 4 місяці тому +1

    No logic works for a religious person. Period.they close their eyes and mind and stop asking any questions.

  • @Philosopher-ey6qg
    @Philosopher-ey6qg 7 місяців тому +10

    Vimoh's approach is Srishti Drishti
    While the caller is Drishti Srishti

  • @piccolosamathegodofdestruc373
    @piccolosamathegodofdestruc373 7 місяців тому +3

    I dont believe in any ideology, but you should let him speak vimoh!

  • @bhavinsinyal8631
    @bhavinsinyal8631 5 місяців тому +1

    @vimoh can i know who this person was?.
    I think I understood him. He just did not do a good job explaining himself.

  • @isqeisqe
    @isqeisqe 7 місяців тому +2

    - I understand what Vipin is trying to get to. "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" is a philosophical thought experiment that raises questions regarding observation and perception. It is an age old question on the subject of The Hard Problem of Consciousness . Vimoh you will benefit from reading more on Panpsychism and consciousness studies.

    • @triloksingh8058
      @triloksingh8058 7 місяців тому +5

      If a tree fall it will Make a sound even if no one around to hear it

    • @isqeisqe
      @isqeisqe 7 місяців тому

      @@triloksingh8058 - the fact is, you don’t know, what you don’t know. That’s the hard problem of consciousness.

    • @triloksingh8058
      @triloksingh8058 7 місяців тому +6

      @@isqeisqe ok let say somewhere some one kills some one and nobody was their to see it does that means that murder did not happen . Just bec im or you or anybody were not present there to see that murder happen that does not means that murder did not happen, sure i will not have the evidence of who did it but some one did it killed that person
      Ps : i do. Not have that good of English if you find any mistake just correct it

    • @avq512h
      @avq512h 7 місяців тому

      It will make sound, in an earth environment the tree is made of wood and when it hits the ground it will make a sound even if no one was there to hear it.

  • @TSainehal
    @TSainehal 7 місяців тому +2

    Best way to prove that god's don't exist
    (Long term but has a high chance of success)
    Step 1-create a new religion
    Step 2-collect data from newly found archeological sites
    Step 3-claim that it is already written on our book and give them a fantasy with a set of odd rules
    Step 4- after gaining some popularity
    Prove them that all this was made up and hence this is the actual origin of religion
    Bonus-include some conspiracy theories
    Like reptile humans and give an explanation(makes the views hungry youtubers spread awareness about it
    Which makes our ride smooth)

    • @princeshivamvarma
      @princeshivamvarma 6 місяців тому

      Omg that's what have been running sicnce long time

  • @chopsuey25
    @chopsuey25 7 місяців тому +3

    Socity to Korea 🇰🇷 v chalata hai 😂 LG and Samsung v world 🌎 wide supply karta hai aur waha 60 to 70% nastik hai

  • @criticalpsyche
    @criticalpsyche 3 місяці тому +1

    i think you should have a writing pad where you write down their ideas in note so they won't change it when they get contradicted.

  • @shabirmir9597
    @shabirmir9597 Місяць тому

    Consciousness is a function of the brain and cannot exist Independent of the brain. Function is an attribute of the structure / body and can not exist in itself without its origin of Body. The two exist fundamentally together

  • @saichand3951
    @saichand3951 Місяць тому

    Vimoh doesn't have a clue about kant or the double split experiment (Scienceeeee)

  • @vishalrao497
    @vishalrao497 7 місяців тому +5

    Ye acharya Prashant ka chela hai kya

    • @RanjanPradhan-ft7ui
      @RanjanPradhan-ft7ui 7 місяців тому

      Acharya Prashant is rational this guy is not

    • @vishalrao497
      @vishalrao497 7 місяців тому +3

      @@RanjanPradhan-ft7ui yes kuch samay tak maine unko suna tha woh bate toh logical karte hai unke vichar women's empowerment, animal compassion pe thik hai aur rational hai
      But unhone kabhi bhi vistaar se samaj me prachalit caste system , chhua chhut pe utna khulkar nahi bola jitna woh baki issues pe bolte hai aur woh bhi spritual jalebis bhi banate hai

    • @donniedarko5574
      @donniedarko5574 6 місяців тому

      Achaya prasant is the guy who knows who are his prime customers and how to satisfy them ..he never talked about nowadays religious politics, he never talked about casteism he never talked about racism , inequality & hero worshipping etc..only he promotes "religion over science" always talks about geeta pado , ved padho etc lekin kyun pade ? ..i used to listen this guy i thought he sound logical & rational but sometime after i discovered that he is just a religious businessman trying to make his career out of religion. The way he talked very rude & his view point is very narrow. I hope someday people will expose him .

  • @coltcannon7785
    @coltcannon7785 3 місяці тому +1

    His argument also implies that if all religions/religious people disappear from Earth then there will be no God left. hahaha

  • @Random-pk7sl
    @Random-pk7sl 7 місяців тому +6

    So dinausoura did not exists at all...since we humans were not even there...😂 how can outisde objevt cease to exist if our consciousness ceases to recognise it...if this is true what happens at night...does my home cease to exists because all family members are sleeping and there ia no consciousness of it?

    • @No-I-dont-want-that
      @No-I-dont-want-that 7 місяців тому +4

      We don't really know, cause you cannot really prove it. If something is not observed, then no one can really know what happens with it. If we try to know, we are observing it, which means it is back to orignal state.
      So if you do not observe something it does not cease to exist but we simply cannot state what happens with it.

    • @Random-pk7sl
      @Random-pk7sl 7 місяців тому +2

      @@No-I-dont-want-that The logic that it cannot be proved if not observed does not apply here since we all know dinosaurs ( and many other species) did exist even before humans existed. The home does not cease to exist at night since if it did cease to exist, we would be soaked in water if it was raining at the time.
      Similarly, now we know diseases like polio, cold etc. are caused by microbes, but before invention on the microscope, we did not. These microbes were not in consiousness of any human, so we should have been perfectly healthy, which is obviously not the case.
      Objects are outside, we only become conscious of it through are senses. Objects are not dependent on consciousness.

  • @RaviN-l3x
    @RaviN-l3x 6 місяців тому

    Bhaiya thoda Hindi me kaha karo samajh me Kam aata hai mai गाँव से हू ना तभी😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

  • @SheshGamingOfficial
    @SheshGamingOfficial 7 місяців тому +1

    Please make a video on the topics discussed in this video at 8 min 30second and 15 minute on YT (5 feb) Dr Vikas Divyakirti Vs Mufti Yasir Nadeem al Wajidi

  • @pawanbarolia6748
    @pawanbarolia6748 3 місяці тому

    Kya bewakoof hai sab human being mar jayenge to ganta phark nahi padta jo cheej rahegi wo to rahegi

  • @kevivsinha5128
    @kevivsinha5128 3 місяці тому

    Caller bhai ko lagta hai ki consciousness chali gayi to matter bhi gayab ho jayega. I think agar woh ye baat purely subjective basis pe bolta toh baat theek bhi hoti.

  • @animaniac9343
    @animaniac9343 7 місяців тому +2

    The guy is confused about reality and "knowledge". I think vimoh's view is "The reality" and "the knowledge about reality" are not as much dependent as the caller thinks , the knowledge may depend upon reality but the reality itself is independent of the "knowledge" ... Correct me if I am wrong .
    On the other hand the caller believes the exact opposite

    • @animaniac9343
      @animaniac9343 7 місяців тому

      I have no clue what you have explained but I'm not saying anything about subjectivity or objectivity about reality I am just trying to understand what their view points are in this debate

    • @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST
      @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST 7 місяців тому

      ​@@narayanbarman5993😮😮😮😮
      Ye kyaa thaa😂😂😂😂

    • @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST
      @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST 7 місяців тому

      ​@@narayanbarman5993internet.. hai
      Isme kyaa subject and objectives reality..
      🤔

    • @soutrikchakraborty5211
      @soutrikchakraborty5211 7 місяців тому +1

      ​​@@narayanbarman5993I feel pity for you dear, you have been misled by society and your parents. Don't worry i will teach you. No one was there to observe the birth of the Sun. But yet the star was born. No one was there to witness the chemical process that gave rise to the first cells, yet they were born. No one is there to look at Triton the moon of Neptune. Yet it orbits the Blue giant. Voyager is not a Conscious being it is not even living, it captured the picture of Triton.
      James Webb Space Telescope observed Galaxies that has never been seen and no Conscious observer can ever see them. Yet they exist and a machine can take a picture of from quadrillion miles apart.
      You appear extremely naive. But it is all right my dear. There is always time to learn.
      Your view is called naive idealism. If you were smart enough, you would know, such view is not tenable. Even Berkley who came up with this view, had to reject it. And he came to the conclusion that God has to watch over reality for it to exist when no one is watching.
      Even in Vedanta, the idea is much subtle. They advocate for an external reality an objective reality, but that reality is in the mind of the Brahman.
      You can not get away with the idea of Objective Reality if you are willing to think even a little.
      The Truth shall set you free my dear. Wake up from this delusion, embrace the truth. Think critically. Question your assumptions. Read Science. Explore the natural world ask the deepest questions. And learn to say you don't know, Instead of making fanciful stories that sooth your heart. I can only hope my message will meet you in a good term, and you will embark on a new journey to know the wonders of this amazing and Natural World. The world that has existed since the dawn of time and will exist long since we are gone !

  • @Jyotirmay_Nath
    @Jyotirmay_Nath 6 місяців тому

    5:47 this is how I feel when I have to explain to my parents why I don't believe what they believe. It always ends in circular reasoning and logical fallacies.
    The thing is religions people are not trying to seek answers because they already have the answer to every question they do not understand, "God".
    I gave up explaining my viewpoint and I just play along now. Its easier to just say "yeah your'e right, I get it" and just move on. Religious gatherings and rituals are cool. Its fun most of the time.

  • @INVINCIBLE_MIX
    @INVINCIBLE_MIX 6 місяців тому +1

    where is the full video?

  • @सर्वंखल्विदंब्रह्मम्

    दृष्टि और सृष्टि

  • @hichcock7364
    @hichcock7364 4 місяці тому

    माथापच्ची😂😂

  • @manojl3388
    @manojl3388 3 місяці тому

    3 Buddhist monks saw a flag waving on a building
    first one said, the flag is waving
    the second says, you are wrong.. its the wind that is waving
    and third one says, you both are wrong... its the mind that is waving
    does this have any meaning? or who do you think is right
    comment please :)

    • @mithilbhoras5951
      @mithilbhoras5951 2 місяці тому

      It all depends on what is meant by "waving". In this case, the flag is waving. Does the wind play a role? Of course, but it is the cause of waving of the flag, not waving itself. And what does it even mean by "the mind is waving"??

    • @manojl3388
      @manojl3388 2 місяці тому

      @@mithilbhoras5951 This is just my assumption. Mind is waving meaning, you are conscious. Without consciousness we wont even see the flag, the wind or the space between subject and flag. Your thoughts?

  • @himanshumakwana3666
    @himanshumakwana3666 5 місяців тому +1

    Banda...acharya Prashant ke videos dekh kr aaya hai...

  • @mithilbhoras5951
    @mithilbhoras5951 3 місяці тому

    I think both of them are describing existence in different ways. Vimoh is talking about the physical object. The caller is talking about the idea of that physical object

  • @Jibreel-jt1qh
    @Jibreel-jt1qh 5 місяців тому

    Consciousness is still a hard problem to solve. Some believe that we are what we experience which is the result of brain activity, but we also see that microprocessor also has complex circuit and data processing capability but it doesn't give computer subjective experience. It is difficult to prove experiencer of subjective experience which don't have physical basis.

  • @Sreetam_xyz
    @Sreetam_xyz 6 місяців тому

    Bro you should have got a national creator award for spreading rationality and atheism in India
    And dhruv rathee for exposing bjp and godi media when there was no one doing that dhruv rathee doing that from 2016

  • @basantyadav7487
    @basantyadav7487 2 місяці тому

    Your reality is born with you and will cease to exist when you die. People arguing that reality continues to exist even after a person is dead, may not be completely right because they are answering this question as a ' third person'. I think reality is perception based and personal.

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  2 місяці тому

      Do you think the internet was created by human beings?

    • @basantyadav7487
      @basantyadav7487 2 місяці тому

      Yes@@vimohlive.

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  2 місяці тому

      @@basantyadav7487 So the internet was created by people other than you who lived before you. right?

    • @basantyadav7487
      @basantyadav7487 2 місяці тому

      @@vimohlive that's correct. Can you please explain little more, where you getting at with this example? This is an interesting thought. All I am saying is that reality doesn’t exist for the deceased. As a living being we can claim that reality continue to exists but that is solely our notion, our perception of it. We cannot claim the same for the people who have departed this world.

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  2 місяці тому

      @@basantyadav7487 The dead don't perceive reality. This is a better way of putting it. Saying "reality doesn't exist for the dead" seems to confuse more than it explains.

  • @Howter2.0
    @Howter2.0 7 місяців тому

    An atheist can understand the pain of a hundred theists, but even a hundred theists together cannot understand the pain of one atheist.😢😢

  • @happyguy650
    @happyguy650 6 місяців тому

    im shocked that such people actually exist.

  • @Ihsan_khan00
    @Ihsan_khan00 7 місяців тому

    My question for you, a religious teacher put forth this argument that consciousness evolved later in the timeline of evolution can it be used in principle to understand former genealogy, since which is act of consciousness.

  • @wonemotivation
    @wonemotivation 7 місяців тому

    एक रिक्वेस्ट है आपसे एक ही भाषा में बात करें ताकि हिंदी में ताकि इंग्लिश न समझ मे आने वाले लोगो को आपकी बातें समझ में आ सके । अब उनको विडिओ शेयर करो तो वो कहते हैं भाई इंलिश इतनी है समझ ही नहीं आया कुछ 😅

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  7 місяців тому +1

      Jisko sirf English aati hai unka kya?

  • @footballfinallivegoals
    @footballfinallivegoals 7 місяців тому +1

    What are your thoughts on Vipassana meditation just asking

    • @RanjanPradhan-ft7ui
      @RanjanPradhan-ft7ui 7 місяців тому

      It’s nothing to do with any religion,u can do it

    • @footballfinallivegoals
      @footballfinallivegoals 7 місяців тому +1

      @@RanjanPradhan-ft7ui yes I have done 3 courses it changed my life from A-Z

    • @footballfinallivegoals
      @footballfinallivegoals 7 місяців тому

      @@RanjanPradhan-ft7ui it's great meditation to get rid of anger issues and to become calm minded I just wanted to know what are his thoughts bcz he is logical with brain nothing else I know Vipassana is great and helpful

    • @RanjanPradhan-ft7ui
      @RanjanPradhan-ft7ui 7 місяців тому

      @@footballfinallivegoals Even buddha and SN Goinka themselves were agnostic but they practiced and promoted vipasana

  • @Sarojkumar-hg3ks
    @Sarojkumar-hg3ks 7 місяців тому

    jab mein chota tha, tab meri dadi maa mujhe kehti thi ki jab saam hoti hai tabh Suraj jo hai woh samandar ke andar ghus jata hai. tabh mein yeh bat sun leta tha. lekin jab mein bada hua toh sachai kuch aur thi suraj aur Samandar satya hai, lekin Suraj Samandar ke andar ghusna yeh humari agyan hai.

  • @amandmx
    @amandmx 7 місяців тому +1

    Ise Hinduism k bare me kuch ni pta hasue ki sadi me khurpe k geet gaa rha h Hinduism me koi spiritual ity ni h sirf jainism or Buddhism me h inke dhrm me pashubali caste system pakhand ye sb h jaisa ki aaj ye krte h

  • @lycopodium262
    @lycopodium262 6 місяців тому

    Is it worth to die for a country?

  • @MrlovaLova16
    @MrlovaLova16 2 місяці тому

    arey Ghochu har imagined reality ko shape and definition dene se wo empirically exist nahi karta.
    Hum apne imagination ko shape and definition de sakte hai.
    Lekin kuch imagined reality ko shape de sakte hai jo really exist karta hai physically and with evidence.
    Example:- house, cigrate, book, pen, phone, cycle etc.
    Lekin kuch imagined reality ko shape and definition de sakte hai lekin wo physical exist nahi karta and uska koi empirical evidence bhi nahi hota.
    Example:- batman Superman Ironman He-Man shaktimaan tiranga nagraj, Last but not the least 'God'.

  • @SyedIqbal-xb7ck
    @SyedIqbal-xb7ck 7 місяців тому +1

    I dont get it...why such effort....its the matter of using some brains rational wits without any biases....thats it.....enjoy being the part of human species..

  • @vaibhavgholap3098
    @vaibhavgholap3098 7 місяців тому

    Sir your contact

  • @Skepticastiel
    @Skepticastiel 6 місяців тому

    Full video

  • @mikejack9465
    @mikejack9465 26 днів тому

    Consciousness ( like picture and video we make) and Reality ( is the substance that we take photos or videos with audio)
    And we thik that tge Video and Pictures ( concious) are cunningly ignore real stuff and assume concious is real...

  • @ayush2426
    @ayush2426 6 місяців тому

    how can i join him for a debate i have friend who can debate with vimoh on topic of religion and god

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  6 місяців тому +1

      Saturdays at 8 pm.

    • @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST
      @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST 6 місяців тому

      U.l.m
      Hindi
      Bhi h ... Aaajoo....
      Sab pe debate kre ... Koi bhi topic ho
      Okk 👍👍👍💓💓
      Koi to aaaye ... Modern education walaa ..
      Jo aate h wo ... Kahaniii ko styaa mante h
      😂😂😅😅😅😂

  • @slaatybot
    @slaatybot 7 місяців тому

    the title bwahahhahahahha perfect

  • @mohammadasifiqubal110
    @mohammadasifiqubal110 7 місяців тому

    Hello sir

  • @mukeshkumardiwan3908
    @mukeshkumardiwan3908 Місяць тому

    vipin you made me Laugh,

  • @pawanbarolia6748
    @pawanbarolia6748 3 місяці тому

    Ye bhai kewal impose karna chahta hai apne vichar , bhai eise kaise deal kar lete ho bhai ,mai to frustrate ho kai bhai bahut dharya hai aap mai vimoh

  • @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST
    @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST 7 місяців тому

    😮😮😮😮

  • @swapnilagarkar9197
    @swapnilagarkar9197 7 місяців тому

    Hello sir i have a ques. Is buddhism part of hinduism ?

  • @warrior_of_liberation
    @warrior_of_liberation 7 місяців тому

    Basically, God resides in Labyrinth of BS. You can find one if you are willing to dive into it.
    As a thinking beings...i think we are better than that.

  • @manavdehi
    @manavdehi 6 місяців тому

    Kon hai yeh 🫡 kya baat kar raha hai

  • @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST
    @EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST 7 місяців тому

    Yr kunsa..ganzaa.. lete h
    Consciousness😅😅😅😅😂
    God h ...nhi h
    Kyaa bkwass h
    Aur ye bolaa piujaaa.naa kre ... Hindu... 24 Hours..
    Poujaa krre h .big big temples bnaree h
    Aur yr ... Person
    Outside universe ki
    Baat krra h
    😂😂😅😅😅😅😅

  • @saugyat
    @saugyat 7 місяців тому

    Atleast listen what he is trying to say Vimoh. Don't be so dogmatic just like the religious people.

  • @DivyanshuRaj-rn3ek
    @DivyanshuRaj-rn3ek 7 місяців тому +2

    Bro I'm 16 yr old boy and want to be atheist like you but the problem is Mera brain iss chiz ko mann hi nhi rha ki god exist nhi krte hai but Mai iss chiz me believe krne laga hu ki god exist nhi krte so bro what I can do caz mere brain me kya ho rha mujhe khud nhi pta chal rha kyunki mere pehle lagta tha ki yes gods exist but when I follow you I want to be a atheist so what I can do(Mera dimag bs kharab ho hi chuka hai)

    • @No-I-dont-want-that
      @No-I-dont-want-that 7 місяців тому +4

      Bhai speaking as an athiest, your internal you will know that god exists or not. No one "converts" to athiesm, it's not a cult. I think you pretty much already do not believe in God.

    • @dr.j3685
      @dr.j3685 7 місяців тому +5

      Be rational in every aspect of life. Athiesm comes naturaly

    • @vimohlive
      @vimohlive  7 місяців тому +5

      Give it time. It's okay to be confused.

    • @DivyanshuRaj-rn3ek
      @DivyanshuRaj-rn3ek 7 місяців тому

      @@vimohlive thanks bro

    • @fictionsolosanyverseyounam7599
      @fictionsolosanyverseyounam7599 7 місяців тому

      ​@@DivyanshuRaj-rn3ek bro we are of the same age, my opinion on this is to follow the evidence and remain neutral until one provides evidence.

  • @gurunathbhogate3805
    @gurunathbhogate3805 7 місяців тому +1

    Don't publish such nonsense speak 🙏

  • @pushkardo
    @pushkardo 7 місяців тому

    What is vimoh’s email id ?

    • @vegaz4966
      @vegaz4966 7 місяців тому

      Nhi bataunga...