Evolution random chance nahi hai

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 бер 2024
  • Support this channel by becoming a member / @vimoh
    Or make a one-time donation by clicking the Super Thanks button under this video!
    I am Vimoh, an Indian atheist and my videos have to do with religion, atheism, Indian culture, and sometimes contemporary political happenings.
    Below are some videos from this channel that every Indian atheist must watch.
    ✔️ Videos for the Indian atheist - • Delving Deeper
    ✔️ How I became an atheist - • My journey between rel...
    ✔️ Why I am not a "Hindu atheist" - • Why I am not a Hindu A...
    ✔️ Why I am not a "Hindu atheist" (part 2) - • Belief in karma = beli...
    ✔️ The Indian atheist problem - • The Indian atheist pro...
    ✔️ Why atheism is important - • You can't fight irrati...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 349

  • @sumitjangir0
    @sumitjangir0 3 місяці тому +78

    Vimoh said personality nhi hoti .... vimoh we are attracted by your Rational Mind not personality. 😊

    • @yashwanthchoudary8302
      @yashwanthchoudary8302 3 місяці тому

      I second this

    • @Aj-vc2nz
      @Aj-vc2nz 3 місяці тому +8

      Bhai. Rationality or rational mind itself can be personality

    • @objective14
      @objective14 3 місяці тому +2

      Wait, who says Vimoh doesn't have a personality? He has a great personality, and a mind to match it!

    • @theseeker4308
      @theseeker4308 2 місяці тому +1

      Make this man Vimoh sit in front of Muslim intellectuall Mohammad hijab(who has destroyed top atheists in his Debates),and you will see how he staggers

    • @yashwanthchoudary8302
      @yashwanthchoudary8302 2 місяці тому

      @@theseeker4308 lol, Mojab and his dawah gang are a joke. None considers them as intellectuals other than Islamist apologists.

  • @shiroyasha_007
    @shiroyasha_007 3 місяці тому +53

    Much appreciated debunk of this 'charismatic' word salad

  • @dr.vishalgupta1029
    @dr.vishalgupta1029 3 місяці тому +25

    Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.
    - T. Dobzhansky

    • @LordDajjal432
      @LordDajjal432 3 місяці тому

      To bhai aap andhbhakt ho kisi ne kahe diya aap maan liye....
      Doctor sahab evolution par aaj ke time theist logo se debate na hi kare to accha.
      Naak,moo se pani nikal jaiega.. bohut buri tarah se maar kha jaoge..

    • @rajkamble-fr6dm
      @rajkamble-fr6dm 3 місяці тому

      ​@@LordDajjal432yeh tatti kisne ki hai isko koi uthake flush kardo

  • @Iodopsin
    @Iodopsin 3 місяці тому +21

    I used to have a dogmatic mindset but watching your videos helps to view things from an alternative angle. Thank you

  • @justacherryontop6538
    @justacherryontop6538 3 місяці тому +28

    A simple and easy rule to follow is challenging your views and always being open to different perspectives, even if it may lower your confidence in your beliefs. I know it's hard as a human, but this is the way.

  • @humanityfirst1417
    @humanityfirst1417 3 місяці тому +6

    Kisne kaha Rationalist k pass Personality nahi hai?Ek Rationalist k Pass Aapke Jaise Personality hona hi Garv ki baat hai Sir✊🇮🇳

  • @asbkumar758
    @asbkumar758 3 місяці тому +2

    Thank you Vimoh sir

  • @eldhoabraham1444
    @eldhoabraham1444 3 місяці тому +17

    Good work! Ahmed Suboor with his fallacies due to dogma thinks that he is some kind of scientist or scholar

    • @LordDajjal432
      @LordDajjal432 3 місяці тому

      Bhai evolution paar aaj ke asthik se baat na hi karo to accha hai gande wale Pele jaonge..
      Abhi wo time nhi rha ki evolution ki baat karke asthik ko chup kar sakte.
      Pani bohut durr nikal gya hai. Aaj bhi wohi ghise pite evolution samne rakh baat karna..

    • @eldhoabraham1444
      @eldhoabraham1444 3 місяці тому +7

      @@LordDajjal432 Bhai kuch logical argument tho de dete. Faaltu comment kar rahe ho Bina matlab ka

    • @alamk716
      @alamk716 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@eldhoabraham1444I like most of vimoh vedio but today I don't think he did a good job, because what it felt like was strawman argument, suboor need to explain in 1 minutes so he broadly explain it like
      1) necessasity
      2) chance
      3) god design
      All can included evolution as a part even if you are deist you can believe in evolution so no issue in they, so bringing evolution doesn't make any sense here because all 3 possibility can include, even if you claim that 3rd was allah, that would still not prove that evolution cant in 1st or 2nd possibilities

    • @alamk716
      @alamk716 3 місяці тому

      ​@@eldhoabraham1444as for random mutations based on orderly circumstances that is arguable point

    • @alamk716
      @alamk716 3 місяці тому

      ​@@eldhoabraham1444against vimoh doesn't know the position of saboor, and claiming that he is wrong when he is talking about about cognitive reason and origin of reason can't be explained by evolution, that is his point but because he needed to keep it short he simply made statment without explaining his position ( saboor)

  • @rajivanmudholkar8452
    @rajivanmudholkar8452 2 місяці тому

    Great explaination sir ji !

  • @WeKnowIslam94
    @WeKnowIslam94 2 місяці тому +1

    Thank you so much

  • @suryakantmahaliya2457
    @suryakantmahaliya2457 3 місяці тому

    Thank you vimoh sir

  • @firstmangaming3164
    @firstmangaming3164 3 місяці тому

    Love you,Vimoh sir!

  • @AADIYOGI112
    @AADIYOGI112 3 місяці тому +1

    Such simple yet intellectual answers.

  • @sushreesenapati4157
    @sushreesenapati4157 3 місяці тому +2

    Very true argument

  • @lifeofkain460
    @lifeofkain460 3 місяці тому +2

    Vimoh sir apki personality aur bolne ka tarika interesting hai and your voice ❤

  • @arshanansari5878
    @arshanansari5878 3 місяці тому +1

    Thanks vimoh this is a much needed video please make videos on dr zakir naik and his arguments 🙏

  • @Mdnowsath
    @Mdnowsath Місяць тому

    Good explanation. Useful to answer my own questions regarding evolution. I do experience self doubt sometimes. What if I am wrong?

  • @bikram1312
    @bikram1312 3 місяці тому +2

    Personality ka pata nhi, but ur voice is literally af, ngl. Like soothing one.

  • @abhijotsidhu7580
    @abhijotsidhu7580 3 місяці тому +6

    Thanks!

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  3 місяці тому +1

      Welcome!

  • @vikasmallick2298
    @vikasmallick2298 9 годин тому

    0:51 us moment ho gya yeh toh

  • @Pixietink
    @Pixietink 3 місяці тому

    Enjoyed this

  • @sukritdubey2630
    @sukritdubey2630 3 місяці тому

    Love Vimoh's self deprecating humor

  • @medialords8647
    @medialords8647 3 місяці тому +1

    I like your small videos Vimoh।

  • @momo19991
    @momo19991 10 днів тому +1

    Does this Saboor guy not have a basic science education? He doesn’t know anything about evolution though natural selection which is the foundation of modern life sciences. Thank you Vimoh for an amazing response!

  • @SheshGamingOfficial
    @SheshGamingOfficial 3 місяці тому +3

    Please make a video on the topics discussed in this video at 8 min 30second and 15 minute on YT (5 feb) Dr Vikas Divyakirti Vs Mufti Yasir Nadeem al Wajidi

  • @rathinmandal2077
    @rathinmandal2077 Місяць тому

    You are doing good work

  • @Listingviral
    @Listingviral 3 місяці тому

    ie sophisticated microprocessor (more's law) are existing because of some external identity not by us.

  • @AshishMkdVlogs
    @AshishMkdVlogs 3 місяці тому +2

    Plz make a video on books you read and get knowledge

  • @hanumankumar
    @hanumankumar 3 місяці тому +1

    Ye to assertion and reason wala question jaise sound kr rha hai

  • @Eternity-of-universe
    @Eternity-of-universe 3 місяці тому +3

    Hello vimoh sir I'm neet aspirant student who saw the casteism in my hostel and coaching the teacher used to teach us sometimes uses casteist slur ch**r for students who didn't corporate with them .even students first ask categories and use -------words for students who come from sc st backgraund very disturbed..🙏😞

    • @johnbrayden6327
      @johnbrayden6327 3 місяці тому

      Kota me?

    • @harshitsingh6287
      @harshitsingh6287 3 місяці тому +1

      Can't believe coz I have spent 1 year in pw vidyapeeth (Kota) & never experienced it even I had some friends frm motion who were frm Bihar and neither they

    • @sameerbhalerao431
      @sameerbhalerao431 3 місяці тому

      I refuse to believe this and sadden if this is still relevant in India and teachers doing it...... Kuch nahi bhai tum apni tayyari karte rehna achha doctor banna.....

  • @bhupendr.choudhary123
    @bhupendr.choudhary123 3 місяці тому +1

    👍👍♥️♥️♥️

  • @aditisingh9499
    @aditisingh9499 3 місяці тому

    ❤❤

  • @Mukesh_ambanii
    @Mukesh_ambanii 3 місяці тому

  • @meGeorge_
    @meGeorge_ 2 місяці тому +1

    Bro I hope you Start doing Formal debate with Muslims and Hindus

  • @Casanova-op1ou
    @Casanova-op1ou 2 місяці тому +2

    Vimoh bhai are u Maharashtran??

  • @snehashispanda4808
    @snehashispanda4808 3 місяці тому

    Original video ka title kya hai.
    Mereko mil nahi raha.

    • @shiroyasha_007
      @shiroyasha_007 3 місяці тому

      "Hardest Atheism Questions answered in 1 minute. Biology debunks Atheism"

  • @Llaaoo123
    @Llaaoo123 3 місяці тому +1

    VIMOH IS LOVE ❤ PROUD ATHIEST ,AND LEFTIST KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK 🎉 theist PROVIDE THE DUMBEST ARGUMENT. LOGIC ANIT LOGICING.😂 lots IF RESPECT TO ATHIEST FROM A EX ANDHBHAT❤ YOU SAVED ME IN A SENSE I AM BEYOND GREATFULL

  • @TheLevenon
    @TheLevenon 26 днів тому

    na acha set hota hai, na achi editing hoti hai, na hi achi personality hoti hai.... motivating me to start my own channel :)

  • @user-ku5ku8pb5t
    @user-ku5ku8pb5t 2 місяці тому +2

    Why You don't do formal debates with religious people on formal channel like Modern Day Debates.

    • @devendraSingh19aug
      @devendraSingh19aug 2 місяці тому

      💀 religious people udded dethe hai, me bhi pehle atheist tha ,, sab bakchodi hai, different types of atheist some are cultural atheist, some are moral atheist,, 💀but morality in sab atheist ki Gand mar lete hai

  • @nilabhdash5461
    @nilabhdash5461 3 місяці тому +1

    Himanshu bhaiya is trying to make some good videos with editing and of course arguments.

  • @sheikhaftab8510
    @sheikhaftab8510 3 місяці тому

    How can i call him?contact him?

    • @Sahilsayyed77
      @Sahilsayyed77 23 дні тому

      Vimoh live UA-cam channel pe live debate 🎉

  • @stepup6620
    @stepup6620 3 місяці тому

    More videos please like this

  • @TryingtobeStoic
    @TryingtobeStoic 3 місяці тому +1

    Sometimes the level of ignorance is truly baffling or maybe they are aware of it and are either in denial or fooling their viewers.

  • @PriyanshuKumar-rt4ss
    @PriyanshuKumar-rt4ss 3 місяці тому +3

    Hey vimoh how can I tackle this statement that " what is the reason that you believe that Socrates existed but Ram or jisus didn't do everything that we know about these characters were written in a book only " ..? Please give something to deal with this 😊

    • @NeKo19113
      @NeKo19113 3 місяці тому +1

      Personal opinion:- reasonable to beleive all these three existed,
      Unreasonable to beleive all of the things their books say they did... by our understanding of this world. Like a reference point, a man on donkey can't cut the moon by himself with current technology, let alone doing it 2000 years ago, makes it unreasonable... And then claims that he had ancient technology that could do it but is somehow lost or can't be rediscovered, still doesn't get anywhere, again unreasonable.

    • @swapnaneeldas3227
      @swapnaneeldas3227 13 днів тому

      ​@@NeKo19113you just called out a particular religion💀😂

  • @addictlisteners1948
    @addictlisteners1948 3 місяці тому +3

    6:47 Do you think that we as humans are still evolving... if yes, then is there any evidence?

    • @itsoblivion8124
      @itsoblivion8124 3 місяці тому +13

      Haan bhai. Ham indo aryans me lactose tolerance hi kafi bada evidence hain

    • @redblueblur6321
      @redblueblur6321 3 місяці тому +3

      The Bajau are traditionally nomadic and seafaring, and survive by collecting shellfish from the sea floor. Scientists studying the effect of this lifestyle on their biology found their spleens were larger than those of related people from the region
      You can watch the video by "BE SMART" on 'Are we still evolving?'

    • @sariyasaham6997
      @sariyasaham6997 3 місяці тому +2

      ​​@@itsoblivion8124that's adaptation not evolution.

    • @avinashpatel3713
      @avinashpatel3713 3 місяці тому +8

      ​@@sariyasaham6997 The whole purpose of evolution is to keep on surviving through adaptation, isn't it ? What do you expect from evolution - to grow an extra pair of legs even when you don't need them?

    • @cucumberwater6
      @cucumberwater6 3 місяці тому +5

      @@sariyasaham6997evolution is essentially the culmination of numerous adaptations over time.

  • @DaCritic.
    @DaCritic. 3 місяці тому +2

    If Evolution is the fact Can We say that we are evolving still?????

    • @capy_SOS
      @capy_SOS 3 місяці тому +7

      YES we are still evolving but at a very very slow pace

    • @farmanmirza786
      @farmanmirza786 3 місяці тому

      Yes...for example your 3rd molar tooth...

    • @DaCritic.
      @DaCritic. 3 місяці тому

      @@farmanmirza786 emm What is happening with that?

  • @jayprakashdewatwal9463
    @jayprakashdewatwal9463 2 місяці тому +1

    आपने दुर्भाग्य शब्द प्रयोग किया
    अथिस्ट ये सब प्रयोग नहीं कर सकते है

  • @johnhinn448
    @johnhinn448 3 місяці тому

    React to more of his videos especially on drawanism. He is master of that

  • @VishalValhellanArya
    @VishalValhellanArya 3 місяці тому +23

    This man is creating an illusion to keep people locked in their delusion.
    These guys put so much efforts in production, little did they knew that a man would just hit record and take a piss on their content.

    • @Haraex
      @Haraex 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@techunsolved there is no objective morality

    • @Haraex
      @Haraex 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@techunsolved even theists can't

    • @Haraex
      @Haraex 3 місяці тому +3

      @@techunsolved there is nothing as something objectively good or objectively bad.
      We propose a standard and based on that standard something can be objectively goor or objectively bad

    • @Haraex
      @Haraex 3 місяці тому +3

      @@techunsolved my standard is valuing human life, and empathy.
      So based on that, caring for people is good while stealing is bad.
      Helping others in need is good while oppressing others is bad

    • @manoharkamble568
      @manoharkamble568 3 місяці тому

      ​@@Haraexwassup bro I'm an immature kid , do you have any media by which we could talk so that you could tell me things from which I could learn from because it's hard for me to understand some words sometimes, although Vijay does a good job in translating and putting it in a very simple way but I thought I could learn from more atheists ?

  • @love4all919
    @love4all919 3 місяці тому +7

    Don't argue scientifically it's simple Intelligent design were created by creator who was in turn was created by a creator who was in turn was created by a creator.. infinity. It's as simple as that and it was know to us in 6th century why not in the first century ?you know Why? Don't ask only believe.

    • @bodiminds6571
      @bodiminds6571 2 місяці тому

      well i could argue with reference to advaita vedanta that the universe itself is pure consciousness , it manifests itself again and again and again ...infinity , but do i know that for a fact in any frame of reference , again im not disrespecting it as i find the idea quite interesting , but i dont believe in it because i dont have any explanation to it in my frame of reference,hence simply , i dont know

  • @Iodopsin
    @Iodopsin 3 місяці тому +4

    These people construct their entire argument by themselves and refute their own questions and upload it on UA-cam with 'DEBUNKED' title.

    • @rajkamble-fr6dm
      @rajkamble-fr6dm 3 місяці тому

      Oh my god Bhai 😮😮🥶🫨😰😱 title mein toh debunked likha hai , aur ek insaan these hota hai haina? 🤡 Yaar in dharmiko ke past mein jaakar thoda inke maa baap ko roko koi gobar bharne se aate jaate kuch bhi bole jaate hai, logical arguments gayi bhaad mein Hume toh criticise karna hai jiska video se koi talluk Tak nahi hai

    • @Iodopsin
      @Iodopsin 3 місяці тому

      @@rajkamble-fr6dm Mujhe bol rahe ho?

    • @rajkamble-fr6dm
      @rajkamble-fr6dm 3 місяці тому

      @@Iodopsin 🤡 ha , maine samjha ki tum tunni ho , vimoh ke offence mein baat kar rahein ho , meri hi galati hai Ghar mein jhagda hogaya tha uska gussa Chadha tha isliye tumpar bhi utar Gaya sorry bhai :)
      Yahan toh mai hi andhbhakt ban Gaya iss baar

    • @Iodopsin
      @Iodopsin 3 місяці тому

      @@rajkamble-fr6dm Bhay kya karu hindu naam hai aadhar card me ni likha hai koi non religious naam btao rkh lunga

    • @rajkamble-fr6dm
      @rajkamble-fr6dm 3 місяці тому

      @@Iodopsin Jainism , buddhism hai convert karlo nahi chaiye toh , waise usse koi farak nahi padta kyuki koi naam se kisi religion se nahi ho jata us religion ke practices se hota hai aur agar tum hinduism ke practices ko deny kar rahein ho toh tum us religion ke nahi ho , atleast practicing toh nahin ho

  • @ManishKumar-jf2fc
    @ManishKumar-jf2fc 24 дні тому

    In my case, he is right, main god ko manana hi nahi chahta. Agar god ko man liya to wo to tumhe nark me hi bhejega jis terah ke karm hai. Agar wo nahi bhejega to to dusare dharm wale god to pakka nark bhej denge, kyoki unako to nahi mane.
    Agar god ko manoge hi nahi, to ko god tumhe judge hi nahi karega. Tum apni marji se kisi god ke pas bhi ja kar, swarg keliye appeal kar sakte ho. Isliye nahi manoge to marne ke bad swarg jane ka jyada probability hai.

  • @S_R2000
    @S_R2000 3 місяці тому +1

    Suboor is of different league man!!!

    • @Suiseisleeps1
      @Suiseisleeps1 2 місяці тому +1

      Nah he is a clown
      Recently Professor dave tore him to pieces
      Go watch the video.
      He doesnt understand evolution, he is just a clueless creationist
      He also debated james fodor, james fodor owned him
      He never debated in moderndaydebates lol he was invited few times never accpted

  • @juasmr1637
    @juasmr1637 21 день тому

    Please do collab with bioshala🙏

  • @minhajfahim7361
    @minhajfahim7361 2 місяці тому

    Since everyone is talking about evolution, i have a more important question why was only humans / homosapiens able to develop such a complex brain. Can other animals achieve our level of consciousness ?why not.
    P.S: I strongly agree with his idea that even if we were created by someone it's more likely that we are the byproduct (un-necessarily results )of this vast universe.

    • @animeshadhikary7802
      @animeshadhikary7802 2 місяці тому +4

      Why only humans is a flawed question. I could also ask why only blue whale evolved to be the largest animal on earth, or why only ants evolved to have the highest population. Evolution does not have an end goal. Small changes happen, and the changes that are useful for the organism at that moment end up persisting. Others die out. Eventually all the small changes accumulate into something very different.

    • @WeKnowIslam94
      @WeKnowIslam94 2 місяці тому +1

      You don't know anything about Human evolution please study it... Because homosapiens k alawa bhi bahut si prajati thi humans ki...

  • @Yogakshema_vahamyaham
    @Yogakshema_vahamyaham 3 місяці тому

    What about the source of impermanent consciousness life cannot be a nothing. Impermanent lifeforms can come out of a permanent source or else even impermanence is not possible. For threads to exist there needs to be cotton. For painting to exist a background sheet has to be there. For movie pictures to exist a screen has to be there.

    • @SameersQuestForGod8
      @SameersQuestForGod8 3 місяці тому +5

      I assume you will take it to,
      For universe to exist a God has to be there,
      Now for a GOD to exist who has to be there?

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  3 місяці тому +5

      The universe exists.

    • @Yogakshema_vahamyaham
      @Yogakshema_vahamyaham 3 місяці тому

      @@vimoh universe is matter so it cannot be the background on which another matter exists. Most scientists are now strongly feeling that there has to be something behind time- space for time- space to exist.

    • @TheoryChronicles567
      @TheoryChronicles567 2 місяці тому

      The argument that the universe, being matter, cannot be the background for another form of matter commits the composition fallacy. Just because the universe consists of matter doesn't mean it cannot contain or be the background for other elements or phenomena. Additionally, stating that 'most scientists' believe something without providing evidence or references falls into the argument from authority fallacy. In reality, the nature of space-time and the possibility of something beyond it are still areas of active research and debate in cosmology and theoretical physics. Various theories and hypotheses exist, but definitive conclusions are yet to be reached.​@@Yogakshema_vahamyaham

  • @Safawantscookies
    @Safawantscookies 3 місяці тому +2

    This guy suboor is quite strong in his ideas, though he is wrong

    • @sheikhaftab8510
      @sheikhaftab8510 3 місяці тому +1

      True!! Nobody wrong here everybody has opinion

  • @gyansahu2894
    @gyansahu2894 3 місяці тому

    Looking forward to it.. 👍

  • @anandchoure1343
    @anandchoure1343 3 місяці тому

    Imagine jab BCI tech se log telepathically connect ho jayenge, religious logo ko kitna regret karenge 🤭

  • @abhishekchaudhary4058
    @abhishekchaudhary4058 2 місяці тому

    2:56 Bhaii kabhi ye baat bol mat dena scientists k saamne

  • @Notorious160
    @Notorious160 3 місяці тому

    No one created universe

  • @Shubuu17
    @Shubuu17 3 місяці тому +1

    Have a look at this debunk video .
    Paradox institute debunked forest's video.
    Video name:
    Biology of Sex: Detailed Analysis of Forrest Valkai's "Sex and Sensibility"
    I personally think that they did pretty well to debunk it

  • @SkepticalScribe3940
    @SkepticalScribe3940 3 місяці тому +2

    It’s not about achi presentation and all lmao. He has done debates in person as well as live and also did long livestreams in the past talking, discussing and answering questions about various topics including evolution.
    Disagree, present your argument but don’t misrepresent.

    • @Suiseisleeps1
      @Suiseisleeps1 2 місяці тому

      And he lost all the debates..
      Specially his debate with James fodor lol
      And he doesnt understand evolution, he used bullshit Philosophy to debunk scientific evidence.
      Since when did philosophy started to trump evidence? Lol
      For clueless muslims with no scientific knowledge, he is a great man
      But in the scientific community he is just a clown
      Bring him to moderndaydebates with a good biologist
      I'm pretty sure he wouldn't debate considering what James fodor did to him in a debate lmao

  • @mdriaj143
    @mdriaj143 3 місяці тому +1

    Environment nein machli direct kese a agaya? Basic class 12ki ncert mein straight likha hyy- "we have no clear idea how the first self-replicating metabolic capsule of life arose"

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  3 місяці тому +13

      That's abiogenesis. Not evolution. All gene-based species evolved from other species. Besides, the fish was an example to illustrate a point.

    • @sameerbhalerao431
      @sameerbhalerao431 3 місяці тому

      Even your existence can be traced back to the first dust spec which came together to form earth......

    • @dear_imran
      @dear_imran 3 місяці тому +2

      Did you ever read recent papers?
      Or you just read 1400 year old book and 50 yrs old NCERT?

  • @alex-boyyt1454
    @alex-boyyt1454 2 місяці тому

    you leave what you do not know to god like you do not know creation of universe correctly this is why you say god created and you do not know what is afterlife so you say heaven and hell and whenever you come to know you create law and leave god
    there is a lot of science in this universe to create the stage and does god see the good and evil in this stage ?
    What is effective- hand or prayer ?

  • @owaiskhan7047
    @owaiskhan7047 3 місяці тому

    In theory of evolution, do we have evidence that the mutations are random and not done by God?

    • @aaronhemrom545
      @aaronhemrom545 3 місяці тому +6

      Do u have evidence that mutations are done by God ? And yes we have evidence that mutations are random

    • @owaiskhan7047
      @owaiskhan7047 3 місяці тому

      @@aaronhemrom545 I don't have evidence that God is doing mutations, now can you please give me evidence that mutations are random?

    • @aaronhemrom545
      @aaronhemrom545 3 місяці тому +4

      @@owaiskhan7047 Mutations are changes in the DNA sequence that can be caused by various factors, such as errors during DNA replication or exposure to mutagens like radiation or certain chemicals. These mutations are considered random because they occur regardless of whether they would be beneficial, harmful, or neutral to an organism's survival or reproduction. The process of natural selection then acts on these random mutations, determining whether they become more or less common in a population based on their effects on an organism's ability to survive and reproduce in its environment.

    • @owaiskhan7047
      @owaiskhan7047 3 місяці тому +1

      @@aaronhemrom545 whatever reasons you mentioned can also be a part of God's master plan, according to me you can't call mutations random until you disprove existence of God. I think it is more appropriate to say that mutations happen but we don't know whether they are random or done by God, being agnostic about this too should not be a big problem for atheists.

    • @aaronhemrom545
      @aaronhemrom545 3 місяці тому +3

      @@owaiskhan7047 things don't work by assumption like maybe someone did......we need enough frame of reference and proofs to support that statement whether it can be proven or not..... we have reason why it happens we have enough reason and evidence to prove it's random and we have zero evidence to prove that God did it....and when it comes to appropriate I don't think it's appropriate being agnostic about flying unicorn and and god like pasta in earth

  • @ansarulhaqueansari3548
    @ansarulhaqueansari3548 3 місяці тому +3

    Sir aap muslim speaker pe reaction video banao

  • @tarakkhan2
    @tarakkhan2 2 місяці тому

    I have a question, if you accept Darwin's theory, then why is evolution stopped.?

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  2 місяці тому +4

      It's not

    • @harshadabhaware1423
      @harshadabhaware1423 2 місяці тому +1

      Evolution is continuous process the question is why we can't see clearly because it takes thousands of years . best example , human organs which are no longer needed e.g.Appendix ,Vestigial organs ,human hair
      Why do these exist because our ancestors need these organs

  • @abhijitrai1349
    @abhijitrai1349 3 місяці тому

    It takes few percent of life to accept truth of your childhood lie. Maybe it will take few percent of humanity's existence to accept this theory. This few percent would be around 1000 of years.

  • @NeyamatAnsari-iz6zz
    @NeyamatAnsari-iz6zz 2 місяці тому +1

    Kya evolution proof ho gaya hai

    • @sumit92artist
      @sumit92artist 20 днів тому +1

      It was proved hundreds of years ago when it was discovered that species are related to each other.

  • @devendraSingh19aug
    @devendraSingh19aug 2 місяці тому +3

    💀live debate karlo yr kisi religious person se

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  2 місяці тому +1

      har hafte karta hoon live channel par. come on any saturday at 8 pm on Vimoh Live

    • @devendraSingh19aug
      @devendraSingh19aug 2 місяці тому +1

      @@vimoh ajja Bhai me live hi hu sanatan samiksha par abhi

  • @arshanansari5878
    @arshanansari5878 3 місяці тому +7

    Like if you want vimoh to make a video on dr zakir naik and his arguments because he is very popular among Muslims😂

    • @SkepticalScribe3940
      @SkepticalScribe3940 3 місяці тому +1

      He is famous for Inter-religious debates (Comparative religion).

    • @sheikhaftab8510
      @sheikhaftab8510 3 місяці тому +2

      He's most of time in religion debates not on atheist debate.

    • @user-eg7fc5vt1d
      @user-eg7fc5vt1d 3 місяці тому

      ​​@@sheikhaftab8510jab khuda apni gand poke karta h science me to science gand ka taufa kabul kar leta h to theist ko bura lag jata h
      😂😂😂😂

    • @user-eg7fc5vt1d
      @user-eg7fc5vt1d 3 місяці тому

      ​@@sheikhaftab8510bhai baat ye h ki god chahe kisi religion ka ho wo science me g**nd poke karta h to science taufa kabool kar leta h phir theist logo ki tashreef me pain hota h 😂😂

  • @ReligionisEvil
    @ReligionisEvil 3 місяці тому

    Sir please upload more like this

  • @moonisra702
    @moonisra702 3 місяці тому +2

    Problem of vimoh!
    1. How life started? If it is produce randomly then, we can say evolution occurred randomly. But every geo chemist deny on pridomial soup, miller and urey theory.

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  3 місяці тому +8

      Evolution and Abiogenesis are two different things.

    • @moonisra702
      @moonisra702 3 місяці тому

      @@vimoh Yes, abinogenesis is hypothesis. And Evolution is true, but subur's point is all about Neo-Darwinism.
      If you prove beginning of life without creator, Neo Darwinism will be proved automatically.

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  3 місяці тому +4

      Evolution by natural selection stands proved already. Origin of life is a different matter.

    • @moonisra702
      @moonisra702 3 місяці тому +2

      @@vimoh "Natural selection" is the confusing term,
      1. So is nature intelligent?
      2. Is nature not intelligent?
      How nature become such intelligent, that it can produce life from pridomial soup(hypothesis) and making random experiment and intelligent human is produced.
      And if nature perform random experiment, then where is pre human animal which time to become man will come tomorrow(because it ia random).

    • @moonisra702
      @moonisra702 3 місяці тому +1

      @@vimoh If nature perform selection /evolution randomly, then why is not random.
      Where is random order? Where is pre human Animal those time to being Human will come tomorrow / next week.
      Australopithecus to homo sapiens race need to random. All the pre human can not reach in same time.

  • @nohandler1493
    @nohandler1493 24 дні тому

    You are making a mistake. Evolution is a random process.
    Have you heard of evolutionary algorithm, cross over and mutation.
    Beside the goal of evolution is to survive in the nature. its not about perfection, its about survival. So, this survival nature gives some guidance while selecting gene pool but the new gene creation process is random
    So evolution cannot answer followings therefore it is still a unproven theory. it is not widely acccepted by the scientific community nor rejected specially in the light of fine tuning and creative sign exist in the nature.
    1. Evolution cannot answer how random mutation and cross over of gene which have extremely low chance of creating something that would meet the demand of circumstances present always results in something that works. For instance, we have not found any fossils of any animal which malformed. Every evolutionary creation is always well formed. we never seen three eyes, one eyesanimals.
    2. genetic variation that exist among humans and other complex life forms are too complex to evolve in such a short period of few million years. Remember no sign of human before 300 thousands years then just appeared in Africa. then evolve over a short period of time
    3. Consciousness and rational thinking. how random evolutionary process emanate rational, logical process. its just does not make sense.
    4. the initiation of life cannot be answered by evolution
    whatever, evolution is not a good theory to answer the origin of life. its for sure.
    I would not bet my money in favor of this

  • @monsterGaming-rf9oi
    @monsterGaming-rf9oi 3 місяці тому

    Bhai to one cellular cell aye kaha se

    • @rajhasan147
      @rajhasan147 3 місяці тому

      Also ask him cell ke ander jo genetics information to evolve itself by mutation, woh genetic coding kaha se aa gayi jo ki ek protein ke liye code krne lag gayi, this is called minimum gene concept.

    • @rajkamble-fr6dm
      @rajkamble-fr6dm 3 місяці тому

      ​@@rajhasan147nahi pata yeh uska answer hoga obviously, tumhara kya answer hai?

    • @rajhasan147
      @rajhasan147 3 місяці тому

      @@rajkamble-fr6dm i believe that God is behind this.

    • @rajkamble-fr6dm
      @rajkamble-fr6dm 3 місяці тому

      @@rajhasan147 if it's your belief I can't do anything about it , All I can say is extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence , Your belief doesn't make up the reality and others opinions , I believe that there is a proper reasoning behind it yet to be found , till then I can clearly say that "I don't know"

    • @rajhasan147
      @rajhasan147 3 місяці тому

      @@rajkamble-fr6dm there will not be any explanation of creation of this great universe without God.

  • @netfreak4498
    @netfreak4498 2 місяці тому

    If anybody have some mind he would conclude that this entire universe is not like atheists claim.

  • @salmanhusainjabri
    @salmanhusainjabri 2 місяці тому

    Sidha debate karo sir agar really apke pas fact h

  • @sariyasaham6997
    @sariyasaham6997 3 місяці тому +1

    Evolution slow aur random hoti hai, machli ke sirf 1 aur 2 generation me nahi hoti.

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  3 місяці тому +11

      I did mention generations.

    • @sariyasaham6997
      @sariyasaham6997 3 місяці тому

      ​​@@vimohthe example you gave was not clear about that.

    • @ryuchic462
      @ryuchic462 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@sariyasaham6997this was an example in its simplest form possible for laymen, not a thesis paper on evolution.

    • @sariyasaham6997
      @sariyasaham6997 3 місяці тому

      @@ryuchic462 then the laymen is wrong

    • @ryuchic462
      @ryuchic462 3 місяці тому

      @@sariyasaham6997 I said he explained it for laymen... Not laymen explained it

  • @iqram390
    @iqram390 2 місяці тому

    Bruhh talks about personality 🤣🤣🤣

  • @devendraSingh19aug
    @devendraSingh19aug 2 місяці тому +1

    💀 live debate kar liya kar , isd tarah se khuch nhi hota ,, hai

    • @jayantabhowmick4298
      @jayantabhowmick4298 2 місяці тому +1

      Chalo idhar live debate karte hai tumse..
      Q 1. Bhagban kon hai?
      Q 2. Bhagban kaha hai?
      Q 3. Insaan ko bhagban ki jarurat kiyun hai?

  • @sheikhaftab8510
    @sheikhaftab8510 3 місяці тому +1

    This time vimoh lose sorry.

    • @Haraex
      @Haraex 3 місяці тому +6

      How?

    • @ClashMafia
      @ClashMafia 3 місяці тому +3

      Because he didn't mentioned shouting Allahu akhbar before big bang 🤣🤣🤣

  • @sikedude5160
    @sikedude5160 3 місяці тому +9

    Christian Muslims Hindu ek hi khet ki muli hai. Sirf bechne ka trika alag hai.
    Jai Bhim

    • @electrondynamics9721
      @electrondynamics9721 3 місяці тому +6

      Ab pakka koi aake likhega RELIJAN AND DRAMA ARE DIFFERENT 😢

    • @shiroyasha_007
      @shiroyasha_007 3 місяці тому

      😢😢​@@electrondynamics9721

    • @sikedude5160
      @sikedude5160 3 місяці тому

      @Liyakat-nl8vp are saar Buddhism nastik philosophy hai saar

    • @sikedude5160
      @sikedude5160 3 місяці тому

      @Liyakat-nl8vp scriptures are controversial saar but Bhagwan Buddha is different to scriptures saaar
      Nobody worship Buddha saar but praise him saar
      Worshipping is to Cosmic energy saar.
      You don't worship human but praise saar.

    • @harshitsingh6287
      @harshitsingh6287 3 місяці тому +4

      Pta nhi kyu mujhe Aisa lg rha h ki hindu muslim aur Cristians ki trh khi ye Jai bheem wale bhi koi cult na shuru kr de 🥲

  • @sonuaryan5287
    @sonuaryan5287 3 місяці тому +5

    I'm the god and I created the world. Who don't want to believe me they will Going to hell.
    Abhi sab mujhe pranaam karo bow down

    • @nitinTDM
      @nitinTDM 3 місяці тому +3

      🤣

    • @nitinTDM
      @nitinTDM 3 місяці тому +3

      Every cult summed up in a single comment

    • @LordDajjal432
      @LordDajjal432 3 місяці тому

      Accha, bhai to aapka fatt kyun rha 😂😂hell se...
      Sab kisi na kisi ka gulam hai to insan bhi Allah, khuda, ishwar ka gulam hai..
      Aab uska marzi romdy row kar koi faida nhi..
      Agr gude mein daam hai accept kar satruta karo God se...😂😂
      Jo ki tum me nhi hai..

    • @sonuaryan5287
      @sonuaryan5287 3 місяці тому

      @@LordDajjal432 hag diya tumane

  • @tafreekladh
    @tafreekladh 2 місяці тому

    bruh still thinks we're living in Darwin's paradigm, wake up bruh, saboor has already dealt with the neo darwinian arguments which you can't even comprehend yet.

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  2 місяці тому +1

      Send me a link to his peer reviewed paper and I will be happy to read it.

  • @helloboys887
    @helloboys887 3 місяці тому +2

    he has no idead of what he is talking about (vimol). Soobur is on an another level. the interest of watching this video died the very moment he said EVOLUTION. 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂LOL
    O BHAI !!!! suboor makes 3 options and he makes rest of his claims on tht but ye vimol to bhai kuch oor hi duniya em haay

    • @dear_imran
      @dear_imran 3 місяці тому +4

      Someone who reads only one book has merely any logic

    • @E-diti
      @E-diti 5 днів тому

      "Now there is three ways that somebody can explain biological design.
      Biological design is either the result of chance, or it's necessity, it's just meant to be that way.
      Or there is a God, there is a designer"
      Two of the three options that suboor is giving to explain how biological design works are
      1. Everything is based on chance
      2. It's just meant to be
      Paraphrasing what vimoh says about the first option- Suboor uses chance based to explain evolution. But that's not what evolution is. Evolution is not chance based, no one ever said that it is chance based. The research and data that we have now goes to show that species develop new mutations every now and then and whether that mutation is carried forward in their gene or not depends on how their habitat responds to it.
      The second point sounds juvenile, since it tells you to just accept what there is without looking for any meaning behind it.
      I think Mr. Suboor just added that alternative to make it look like he is offering more quantity of options, which in reality he is not, considering the fact that neither atheists nor theists are willing to accept things as they are without looking for any answers.
      In fact the atheists are actually more inclined to look for answers because they don't rely on older, outdated arguments to support their understanding. The rigidity of religion and its reliance on uncontested and seemingly "undeniable truths" Is what makes it unable to answer questions posed by agnostics and atheists.

  • @blade9235
    @blade9235 3 місяці тому +2

    *Subboor ahmed is a Jalebi-man...makes jalebis around arguments only to twist that Argument to a different topic He's familiar with, Just So that he can beat you...these muslim apologists are the most dishonest people you will ever come across.*

  • @sariyasaham6997
    @sariyasaham6997 3 місяці тому +3

    17:49 study scriptures and do research rather than being ignorant .

    • @vimoh
      @vimoh  3 місяці тому +19

      Study science and do research. Instead of being ignorant.

    • @Shubuu17
      @Shubuu17 3 місяці тому +1

      Hey @sariyasaham6997 great work man why don't you join him for a live debate and show this foolish atheist proof you have found?!

    • @sariyasaham6997
      @sariyasaham6997 3 місяці тому

      @@vimoh I'm studying science I don't see any problem here. Whereas you are arrogant and ignorant at the same time.

    • @eldhoabraham1444
      @eldhoabraham1444 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Shubuu17 Why don't you take a look at the reaction videos between Smile2Jannah and Vimoh. Not only you'll find who is foolish but also misleading and lier

    • @sariyasaham6997
      @sariyasaham6997 3 місяці тому

      ​@@vimohI'm studying science and I don't see any problem with that.
      On the contrary you are arrogant and ignorant to study scriptures(maybe other than hinduism).

  • @arpanhada49
    @arpanhada49 3 місяці тому +1

    Let’s say there is a god, who says that he is good? There are children dying everyday and your god doesn’t do anything about it. So either god isn’t good or he isn’t omnipotent or he doesn’t care.

    • @tide7107
      @tide7107 3 місяці тому +1

      These guys are actually foul enough to say "karma" and justify children dying in horrible conditions like lithium mining and war

    • @devendraSingh19aug
      @devendraSingh19aug 2 місяці тому

      💀 is God is your personal servant,

    • @tide7107
      @tide7107 2 місяці тому

      @@devendraSingh19aug no, but it (god) is no benevolent entity from the persepctive of us sapiens, unlike what we sapiens ourselves claim. Emphasis on us humans claiming that it is benevolent.

    • @notatallnerd
      @notatallnerd 2 місяці тому

      karma wale sabse chtiye hote

  • @rajhasan147
    @rajhasan147 3 місяці тому +10

    None of your argument is strong, you are just assuming things and making it fact to reject God.

    • @mijana961
      @mijana961 3 місяці тому +7

      Atleast they are are Args
      Religious people states everything

    • @Haraex
      @Haraex 3 місяці тому +6

      No they are naturalistic assumption and explanation based on evidence.
      There is no need to move towards supernaturalistic explanation when we have naturalistic one

    • @rajhasan147
      @rajhasan147 3 місяці тому

      @@mijana961 are you talking about religion or God here?

    • @rajhasan147
      @rajhasan147 3 місяці тому +1

      @@Haraex yes this too evidence based assumption that in a single prokaryotic cell, all molecules combined and RNA formed then DNA which has an information to code for a protein. where did you get minimum set of gene before first cell? Remember that information cannot come itself and what is the deciding factor of coding according to you at the initial stage? Is nature deciding the codings by combining molecules? Is the nature putting these information to the RNA and DNA? Is nature conscious?

    • @Haraex
      @Haraex 3 місяці тому +3

      @@rajhasan147 information comes from evolutionary history.
      And there are naturalistic explanation for this.
      I recommend you to watch Dave Farina aka professor Dave explains video on this

  • @bidyutbikashtalukdar8675
    @bidyutbikashtalukdar8675 3 місяці тому

    Astrology ke bare me banao..
    Also don't just judge too quickly

  • @mohammadshahanshahakbar874
    @mohammadshahanshahakbar874 Місяць тому

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Whom are you poking child?? do you even know about Subboor Ahmed?? He has debated your teachers and you being a student thinks what?😂😂😂😂why don't you invite him on a live debate. What about Zeeshan Smile to Jannah where are those videos you made against him those replies have you deleted them??

  • @harshsharmap.2333
    @harshsharmap.2333 3 місяці тому +1

    Vimoh : aham bhramasmi 😂 muje god maan lo