Masculinity and Its Discontents - Nina Power | Maiden Mother Matriarch 1
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лют 2023
- Nina Power is a writer, philosopher, and a senior editor and columnist at Compact Magazine. Her latest book can be found here…
UK: What Do Men Want?: Masculinity and Its Discontents
www.amazon.co.uk/What-Men-Wan...
US: What Do Men Want?: Masculinity and Its Discontents
www.amazon.com/What-Do-Men-Wa...
Australia: What Do Men Want?: Masculinity and Its Discontents
www.amazon.com.au/What-Men-Wa...
Canada: What Do Men Want?: Masculinity and Its Discontents
www.amazon.ca/What-Men-Want-M...
Nina and I spoke about masculinity, Andrew Tate, pick up artistry, and why there seems to be such an appetite for masculinity influencers in the internet age. We spoke about the way in which gender has been made into a consumer item, and why straight women seem to be so interested in reading romantic fiction about gay men. We spoke about the nature of suffering, transhumanism, and why the war on suffering and human nature will never be won. Enjoy!
Other books mentioned in the show:
Gender by Ivan Illich
www.amazon.com/Gender-Open-fo...
Follow Nina’s Substack - ninapower.substack.com
Read her at Compact - compactmag.com/columnist/nina...
The MMM podcast can also be found on Apple, Spotify, and all other streaming platforms.
audioboom.com/channels/5099195
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...
open.spotify.com/show/4p50jor...
Follow Maiden Mother Matriarch on social media:
Twitter: / maiden_podcast
Instagram: / maiden_mother_matriarch
TikTok: tiktok.com/@maiden_podcast
#MaidenMotherMatriarch #LouisePerry #NinaPower
"Concern that something may not be a good idea is not hatred." That this is currently considered a radical idea is a very telling thing. Thank you Nina and thank you Louise.
It’s not hate , but righteous indignation.
@@charlesbrown1365 In other words, emotionally invested belief that something is a bad idea.
@@scottreichek2986 yes, a well founded belief
@@charlesbrown1365 We're all confident our beliefs are well founded. Convincing other people is where it gets tricky. Societal discourse is a form of salesmanship. Today, most people are too wrapped up in their product to make sure someone would stick around for their whole sales pitch. It's why memes are so popular. It takes about a second to plant the seeds of curiosity for a good idea, or the seed of doubt for a bad one. The worst of all sales pitches is, "If you disagree with me, you're a (insert dismissive condescending epithet here), and I hope someday (insert horrible outcome here)."
@@scottreichek2986 Actually many people probably already agree with this belief. So it’s more a matter of waking people up to their subconscious mind , to think consciously about something they don’t think about much .
It is refreshing to see and listen to two young women who are sensible and know what they are talking about.
Louise is a modern voice of reason amongst the noise. Intelligent, articulate, kind and feminine - an aspirational figure for young women. Wishing her much successs!
So, you ADMIT that you are a feminist. 🥴
@@vivienneb6199 Probably true. I can see that. I wonder if that happens a lot to women. If they have to constantly wonder if they’re getting attention/praise based on the merits of their work or it’s just dudes who want to **** them.
@@trobins4473, Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
@@ReverendDr.Thomas I see you. I see you lashing out and calling me names because I made fun of your lack of pithiness in another comment.
@@vivienneb6199 I read and enjoyed her book and I don’t think she does that. Of course I am a man though. What is it you think I’m missing?
Both of these women make me love being female even more! Amazing podcast.
Same. I’m not naturally inclined to be an activist, but have felt pulled into this war waged on women.
Both of these women make me love being a man! They are so positive and supportive and understand the mindfield that both men and women have to go through.
I'm a white man almost 92, and watching, listening I realize that so much has changed in the freedom females have and the angst males have developed (see Andrew), that unless you've lived through it all from the conditioning a child raisedd in the 1930's 'til now, it is impossible tor you youngers to fully grasp the fear and despondency so many in my generation are apt to feel for the future. Neither generation can understand the other, but that said, I' m optimistic for you. I think respect and the need for each other will bring men and women to a better place in their relationships than we've ever dealt with before.
Wow 92? You must have seen some sh!t
👍👍
I hope you are right. Bless your optimism
Ohhh, I'm so glad to find you have a podcast, Louise!
Good Girl! 👌
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Being ‘gay’ became an identity when the word gay was annexed, from being an expression everyone enjoyed, appropriated to mean or represent a sexual identity in the 70’s.
Hi Louise,
Thanks for your podcast and for always bringing in insightful speakers.
Ironic that a video about 'masculinity' contained almost nothing on the subject. But perhaps not so ironic when Nina briefly pinpointed one of its key aspects: that no one cares about men or their feelings. But not to worry, it was only brief!
The world has always existed to make the lives of women easier while they pity themselves and shame everybody into guilt.
I've seen your appearances on Jordan Peterson and Chris Williamson's podcasts, and always appreciated your perspective. It's so cool to be in on the ground floor of a podcast which I expect will grow considerably over the next few years. Keep up the amazing work!
26:43 - "In an economy of desire - whose desire takes precedent?" - Easy! Whoever can be politically manipulated into power blocks and/or being useful idiots for covert power grabs would be the most important to placate. Pretty much the more malleable and the less self-aware the better. This kind of entropy is great for Machiavellian plays.
lol didn't expect to hear that Nina Power listens to Paul Joseph Watson.
Fantastic stuff! Could listen to Nina Power all day long: so intelligent, reasonable and insightful on a huge range of issues.
Hi, Louise. I listen to JP on DW and enjoyed your interview; then I found you here and subbed. ;)
wonderful episode
looking forward to what follows. godspeed!
Lovely video to spend my Monday morning watching :)
Oh you podcast is brand new. I though you had it for a while when you talked about it on Peterson. Great initiative and great name. Subscribed, liked and notification bell hit.
Very interesting podcast; looking forward to future episodes!
Well done. I’m looking forward to more interesting conversations. 😊
This was a delight to listen to!
Excellent discussion. I'm excited for many more.
I suppose the only feedback - with could be given to a lot of new podcasts - is to work to equalise the sound level between presenter and guest. It just makes it easier to listen to over an hour of content.
SIMP 🤡
Women provide men one of the ultimate social proofs in relation to other men and to me Tate represents a confluence of the two perennial strands of attractive & conquest masculinity in terms of women.
Womens' choices of the men they are choosing & rejecting are rapidly reshaping human populations, intensified by their active reproductive choices & boundary destruction campaigns (borders most pertinently) & I don't see how its not building huge incentives & pressures towards a new male sexual savagery & genuine rape culture (just look at the conviction rate now).
As a married father of 4 daughters it is maddening that it is predominantly females that are hobbling all my efforts to give them security & happiness, often through intra-sexual propagandising.
There are diminishing incentives for average good men to remain so & there will shortly be a massive supply drop off as production has all but stopped.
That last part is particularly ignored: that sans the most valuable social reward for virtue--the ability to form a family and propagate into and become a last part of the community at large--men will adopt the most expedient means of achieving this end (if not being a part of the community, then at least crude biological success) since that which is not censured is tacitly allowed. This is not even mention that virtue and probity are now being increasing seen as an impediment to successful mating compared with what you've stated as "sexual savagery" being demonstrated. I mean, why be a reserved, altruistic, and contemplative male who seeks distinction through social service and being a model to the community? Why be an Atticus Finch and when you can be an Andrew Tate?
Very insightful comment. Women appear to be aware that they are now agentic, they are actively propagating this new sexual system.
It's astonishing that this propagandising happens even as women are hurt by and grow increasingly cynical through the current sexual culture. Meanwhile, there's growing backlash from men towards excessively promiscuous women.
Two of my favourite thinkers atm, very good and excited for more!
Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
It has seemed for some time that there had been a rising awareness of toxicity arising from the internet disproportionately impacting young women though social media (e.g. the excellent work by Jonathan Haidt). It is good to see here a discussion where it is recognised that there is also a disproportionate effect on young men through the proliferation of poor role models. As a dad of a twenty year old boy it is a constant source of concern, and while perhaps less likely to lead directly to mental I'll health as the effects on girls, it may also perhaps be no less bad for society.
Would upvote this more than once if I could. The sad fact is its almost a marketing ploy, its much easier to garner sympathy for young girls rather than young boys, such is the amount of demonizing that has happened over the last 30? 40? + years, and also the innate desire to protect women and girls more than men which goes back much further obviously. You see this absolutely everywhere. Nina Power and others are refreshing on this point.
@@HarryBuxley, do you understand that GYNOCENTRISM is a psychological illness, Sir?
Etymologically, the word "GYNOCENTRISM" means "putting women in the centre" and is the phenomenon where society and individuals favour females over males (and in this instance, also a pathetic "white knight").
For example, if a man normally believes the woman's side of an argument (especially when a woman is making accusations against men), that man is GYNOCENTRIC.
Are you afflicted with the mental disease of GYNOCENTRISM, Silly Sinful Simp?
Women don't celebrate money? You may not have been paying attention to fashions. A few names Gucci, Versace, Chanel, Kardashian - no, no worship of money in women pursuing these brands!
American women perhaps.
So happy to see you've began your podcast! Thank you for sharing your mind with us. I look forward to more!
Good Girl! 👌
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Great conversation. Thank you. And another great treat on Jordan Peterson channel just airing. .
Holy shit I'm ready for all the episodes of this
God bless you Louise. You’re so special.
And to make it even better you’re Aussie right!? 😆
"masculinty is the true embracing of responsibility"
great episode!
Great and lowly are RELATIVE. 😉
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
@@ReverendDr.Thomas No, and what is your problem? Lol
@@aldoushuxley5953, did you know that in ancient Bhārata (India), a person who consumed ANY type of animal was known as a “Chandāla” (dog-eater) and was not even included in mainstream society, but was an outcast?🥩
So, do you ADMIT that you are an animal-abusing criminal, Mr. Dog-eater? 😬🙄😬
@@ReverendDr.Thomas I don't eat dog, and do not live in ancient India, so who cares?
@@aldoushuxley5953, I regret to inform you, Slave, that your response is INCORRECT. 👎
The CORRECT answer is “Yes, Master”. ✅
😇 Bless You Always, Dirty Demonic DOG-EATER! 😇
Good stuff.
Thanks for the discussion... Interesting point about the widespread effort to eliminate all forms of suffering
I found the discussion on why so may young women in particular are pro-trans compared to men and also older women. I have thought for a while that this is rooted in an anxiety among many adolescent girls about stereotypical masculinity. The popularity of boy bands for example whose members display a very feminised view of masculinity, seems to me to present a pathway for girls to make the transition from the platonic love embedded in their same sex relationships towards hetero sexual desire. I suspect that the pro-trans young women have a fantasy that trans-women tend to look like Blair White and embody a fantasy femininity, that by definition cannot be dangerous or threatening. There are other factors that believe are at play, but I am sleepy and have an early start tomorrow, so i will leave it there.
Apologies for the mistakes in spelling. I really am tired.
ua-cam.com/video/K_vAcaSqWVk/v-deo.html
I tend to feel that young childless women suffer from a massive experiential Blindspot. Nothing rams home the absolute physical reality of sex like carrying, birthing and rearing an infant.
It’s an incredibly vulnerable time. Even breastfeeding in parents rooms… when a dad walks in to change one of his children, I immediately check myself, and look around to make sure he has a child with him and is not in there without a good reason.
For natal males to have carte Blanche over these kinds of spaces makes me feel so incredibly icky.
@@meghan8020 You are afraid to feed you kid if their dad is there? Why?
@@oliviamaynard9372 that’s not what I said.
I said, when a man walks in - I check that they’re in there with their child. No issues with dads taking care of their children’s needs.
I was breastfeeding in the women’s room once, and a male worker at the shopping centre walked in three times, in the space of 20mins, to ‘fill his drink bottle’. I have no idea why it was necessary for him to be filling his water bottle in the women’s and babies room - while mothers were breastfeeding.
THAT makes me uncomfortable. You’re a 25 year old dude. Fill your drink bottle in the god dam staff rooms/lunchrooms, or buy yourself a drink at the Target which is 200m away.
Fuck off out of the privately allocated rooms where women go to feed their infants in private.
I am new to your channel, I was attracted to your title and curious about your content, inspiration for creating it and what your vision is for your channel. I wonder if you might post in your "About " section?
Can you imagine a man writing a book called Femininity and its discontents. Let’s face it, it would never happen.
I hope more women (and men) listen to you
Because? 🤔
@@vivienneb6199, respected British anthropology professor, Dr. Edward Dutton, has demonstrated that “LEFTISM” is due to genetic mutations caused by poor breeding strategies.
🤡
To put it simply, in recent decades, those persons who exhibit leftist traits such as egalitarianism, feminism, gynocentrism, socialism, multiculturalism, transvestism, homosexuality, perverse morality, and laziness, have been reproducing at rates far exceeding the previous norm, leading to an explosion of insane, narcissistic SOCIOPATHS in (mostly) Western societies.
Really good but you need a new mic or popguard or digital audio workstation to adjust the popping
Please do not speak on behalf of normal Men. Please.
Men are tired of this BS.
What normal men?
@@wyleecoyotee4252why are you in EVERY post about men and women constantly simping for women and shitting on men? You have no life at all. You post on every comment.
"Strong where it's appropriate "- well that's where the rub lies, isn't it? Appropriate as determined by whom?
By women, of course, and whatever her mood is in the moment. X might be the correct thing to do now; but 5 minutes earlier or later , completely the wrong thing to do! You as a man are supposed to intuit which is which!
15:15 When equilibrium is reached in a system, no movement is possible at all
Nice to raise awareness about this ridiculous acceptance of hating the haters
One hell of a way to launch the podcast by appearing on Jordan Peterson’s podcast!
Very clever!
I'm not sure why any thinking person would give heed to the imperfect opinions of some ignorant psychology professor. There are a handful of EXTREMELY wise sages currently on this planet who can logically and completely answer practically any question that an intelligent soul is likely to ask regarding morals and ethics.
The fact that Jordan supports men buggering each other (by which I mean, that he supports homosexuality and other criminal activities, such as the unnecessary consumption of poor innocent animals) is MORE than sufficient proof that he is not as religious as he claims, and that any decent, holy person ought to shun his inane teachings and flee into the loving arms of a teacher of Truth.
Furthermore, in a recent interview in Benjamin Shapiro's UA-cam channel, he admitted that his wife figuratively (and I'm sure also LITERALLY) wears the pants in his household. 👖
I would be more than pleased to provide you with links to the UA-cam channel of a few enlightened beings who will quickly set you on the path to perfection, as opposed to the DELUDED moral subjectivism professed by "Doctor" Peterson (pun not intended).
Please find below a couple of such ENLIGHTENED masters to which I referred above:
Professor Alan Watts
(now deceased, so he doesn't have his own UA-cam channel - just search for his videos on numerous channels)
Swami Sarvapriyananda
(ua-cam.com/users/vedantany1894
or search for "Vivekananda Samiti")
Jagadguru Svāmī Vegānanda on Facebook.
@@ReverendDr.Thomas - Is this a joke? So you hate anyone who is gay or who eats meat, lol?
@@elihathaway6784, search the Stanford University Encyclopedia of Philosophy or Wikipedia (both are online encyclopedia) for "LOGICAL FALLACIES".
Then, return to this comment thread and inform me which LOGICAL FALLACY you have just used, Slave.
@@ReverendDr.Thomas - Reverend's like you are the reason people are leaving religion en masse. Being gay and eating meat are not crimes. You're so over the top I genuinely thought you were a joke!
@@elihathaway6784, I am patiently awaiting your response to my request, SLAVE. ☝🏼
Incidentally, Silly Sinful Slave, "Reverend" is an ADJECTIVE. 🙄
Furthermore, it’s called “Spell-Check”. ✅
Look into it, SILLY Sinner. 👨🏻🎓
It's funny to me that women like to trivialize concepts like hypergamy as if oh, damn, men noticed that, and then act like Pick up artistry is this major issue which all men are doing which if you watch manosphere is a very small segment of the movement unless self improvement is considered a form PUA.
Women see men's issues as simply a speed bump on the road to the goal of "having it all." Increasingly women don't like the word "equality" because women have more rights and less accountability yet still expect men to provide as if she's a helpless victim.
The idea that we can separate ourselves from the natural world and or transcend nature or control it isn't a new idea. The fact that we have tried this experiment before, as a species, albeit with less technologically sophisticated tools, doesnt alter the fact that these experiments have and will always, ultimately, fail. We are animals and therefore a part of the natural world, no matter how much padding we buffer ourselves with.
A drive by thought while listening to the discussion... It's harder for a woman to harm a men either emotionally or physically. That imbalance will never go away unless you turn all men into women.
That is rather PRESUMPTUOUS of you, wouldn’t you agree, Slave?
Presumption is evil, because when one is PRESUMPTUOUS, one makes a judgement about a matter, despite having insufficient facts to support one’s position.
Maybe physically, but women can definitely hurt men emotionally.
@@patrickdoherty4527 That's fair, as just about any man could tell you if they were so inclined.
@Patrick Doherty men can hurt women emotionally too, that is an equal opportunity risk. Risk of physical harm is imbalanced
@@jayjaydubful Yeah, for sure. I doubt anyone would argue that.
It's interesting - men as a group possess all the traits that one would expect from tens of thousands of years of female selection pressure. Listen to Dr. David Buss on this - its absolutely fascinating.
How can you have a conversation about Andrew Tate and not have a conversation about women's false accusations against men?
Because that discussion doesn't advance the mainstream gynocentric narrative.
It’s not a discussion about Andrew Tate, they only talked about him for about 2 min. It is a big problem though, you’re right.
Your guest wrote a book on what men want. I listened intently and with great curiosity for any insights she might have on the subject. Alas, it doesn't seem she knows anything about men other than pop culture stereotypes and the foolishness floating around academia.
Bro, one man to another, it seems to me to be an intelligence issue on your part.
@@Ssm19494 Bro, you sound like a chick resorting to stupid insults.
It's hard to concentrate on the discussion when both the speakers are breathtakingly beautiful 🙄
if the signifiers of adulthood are out of reach, why is that? You think millenials just did this to themselves out of some perverse neoteny? It's free market fundamentalism. While you argue about "difference" the market is both destroying, monetizing and securitizing it.
After a few of your podcasts, I have noticed a tech problem: your voice mic vs your guests. Your voice is almost too full and their’s is tinny and distant. I agree with your views, just wish you’d fix the balance, plz.
It's because Louise is close to the mic, causing proximity effect which increases the bass in the voice. Balance is generally better when both interviewer and interviewee agree to use the same mic technique.
I think it might be helpful to take things one step further than noting the absence of male role models and look at the reason why that is. One clue would be to look at what happens to people, both men and women, who speak up for men. They are attacked. And Louise very clearly cites the notion that men should see themselves as part of a class, as feminism does. The problem comes when the whole class is defined by the worst behaviour of members of that class, i.e. one spoils it for all the rest. This then alienated and demises people in that class even if they have not behaved badly. It's currently popular to demand men sort each other out, call each other out etc. But men have no control over all other men, and all men know that some men will always behave badly. So we have been set an impossible task and that is indeed demoralizing. It's very telling that the first individual man discussed is Andrew Tate as this is symptomatic of the mode of analysis of the male condition since the concept of patriarchy popularized: judge the whole by the exception. Once demoralized by being shoved into a fame it is impossible to succeed at, i.e. make all men good in feminist eyes, men withdraw, even from life itself.
This is further illustrated when Nina discusses deaths of despair, but instead of examining the reasons for the despair, Louise observes that men are better at suicide because we are more aggressive and thus use more effective means, The despair question flies by her unnoticed. In an age of feminism and a feminist press where it has become impossible to a) a good man because there's no such thing, and b) a good role model for the same reason because any attempt to do so in countered with the very powerful argument of the tragic consequences of the worst o male behaviour, then only the very tough and resilient will continue to be heard, e.g. Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate. In fact, Jordan Peterson predicted the rise of Andrew Tate before either were famous in a lecture on anti-social behavior where he posited that if society continues to be hell-bent on repressing normal healthy masculinity, it would inevitably give rise to pathological extremes.
I simply do not believe it is possible to provide a comprehensive analysis of the issues let alone a remedy without acknowledging the detrimental consequences of class-level analysis and it's prescription is general and those of feminism in particular. When one starts from the position that one class is systematically oppressing another class it renders it impossible for any individual within the oppressor class to been seen as decent, let alone the majority of members of that class.
When feminism seeks the liberation of women, one needs to ask 'liberation from what'. The answer would appear to be men. So where does that leave the men? Alone.
Solutions can only be found, then, not with more class-level analysis, but less. Instead of emphasizing, for example, 220 women a year are killed by men, it might be more helpful to point out only 1 in 100, 000 men kills a woman. The current paradigm equates to every man in a Wembley stadium packed with only men being held responsible for the behaviour of one - when they don't even know which one he is until after the event. And instead of attacking women who speak up for men, try listening to them, then they wouldn't need to get so loud and extreme just to be heard.
A feminist agenda will never help men because it relies on the demonisaation of men for its weaponisation of victimhood, it's most powerful weapon,and it's designed to help women, not men. There's a clue n the name. So, please, Louise, examine your 'feminist priors' for the damage they do to men and then ditch them, because they are lethal to good men.
Some very good points, thank you. I often notice that the articulate women who do speak up on behalf of men or against the "men and women are the same" dogma, still to a certain extent retain this lens of; "we should care about the struggles of men but also don't forget feminism" and it grates on me a bit for reasons that I don't quite understand. IMO part of it least is an effort to remain moderate, accessible and not veer into full-on fringe commentator status, so I generally give them a pass.
And yes, andrew tate was very predictable. And I suspect there will be quite a few more similar characters before we are done, and absolutely a big a part of it as JP pointed out ( I never saw that particular lecture ) is the repression of healthy male masculinity, along with a large dollop of ignoring how young women select partners and a lot of lying about both those two things.
@@HarryBuxley, Good Girl! 👌
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Nice comments fellas! Be nice to have spaces to allow bias but not to overtotalize! I don't think this has hit academia or our public truth doctrines... Speak your phenomenological trauma, for example, as a good source of truth , but let's not over totalize! Society's pandering to women has not let up with the rate society has sort of included women to public decisions. Own your privilege can be a decent mantra whoever it's all about intersectionality for me , not for thee. Or reflexive global perspective for thee ... But not for me!
A lot of similar pattern in sex and gender as with general power dynamics in social organization in general... Perhaps feminists could hone in on personal responsibility's but also men in general might look at social organization and being inclusive and not putting up with power dynamics as they are... Feminism has proffered some good points about power dynamics in general if even to only point at men. We might apply the language as containers rather than specifically the contents in the containers.... So white men would prolly be more global and inclusive and accurate to be a certain type and personality, role maybe and specific and even particular examples where we get a case study of the whole relationship not just psychological analysis on the oppressor. Basically that's what's happening enmasse - psycho-analysis on men in isolation removing all the relationships and other factors! Hardly rational , or objective 😮
40:19 Like trying to find a career path that pays an existence and survives long enough to beat out offshoring, Globalization, automation or outright elimination long enough to pay for your expenses to get your degree training or tools isn't ENOUGH to figure out.
Funny to mention Neil Strauss, he went to therapy and gave up his philandering ways. As did Max Tucked I believe. A potentially very interesting thread in this movement could be the men who write about caddishness and then give it up.
Viva la difference !
So do women want equality between the sexes? Not just in the 'good' things e.g. CEO roles, but in the 'bad' as well?
Clearly the answer is no.
No women are demanding we address the under representation of women in the trenches of Ukraine.
No women are demanding we address the under representation of rapists in female prisons nor their over representation in male prisons! If you are unhappy with your daughter sharing a jail cell with a rapist; why are you content for your son to share that cell?
So why don't women want real equality rather than special treatment?
There are women fighting in Ukraine
Equality doesn't mean exactly the same. I don't want men caring for young children- they aren't as good at it & they pose more of a risk. I don't want women working in mines as they will be less effective. But I want both sexes to have equal political representation & financial etc rewards.
@@wyleecoyotee4252is it 50/50? Not even close. You are the simp ultima
@@jayjaydubfulwomen dont deserve equal pay for unequal work. Mostly work leas hours. Also if women made as much money as men totally then dating wpuld die, women only date up.
@Aman6173d2y no one is saying women should be paid the same for doing less work, all annual salary is pro rata or else people are paid by the hour.
Not true about women only dating up, most of my boyfriends have earned less than I do & that's very common amongst people I know. Generally I think things are less complex when both partners are in similar economic situations
YOU KNOW
I'm curious how they feel about the teachings of Sigmund Freud.
What do you know about it?
@iammraat Haha not a whole lot. I just know that the name of the video is a spin off of Freud’s book "Civilization and its Discontents."
@@tommygriffiths659 right, a good opportunity to read his work and the process through which he derives his thought
Videos have disappeared. What happened?
Gosh I would marry a woman like one of these 2 in a heartbeat! And I'm a "high-income earner". It's not hard to find women, but to find women like this in today's society is absolutely freaking impossible!
What do you mean? The world is full of well rounded intelligent women, who are sensitive and interested in having an intellectual conversation.
However, if you believe that the best you have to offer is the fact that you're almost a surgeon, you'll probably find that most women who are interested in you will be more focused on status and things like that. Not that it's bad in itself but I know women who would shy away from men who are a bit obnoxious with their status, simply because that's not what they're looking for.
@@frusia123 I think it's hard to find women who are traditional now a days. Reading my comment it sounds a bit obnoxious. In my profession, it's not that you can get easily get into relationships, quite the opposite. I barely find the time, and time (lots of it, good quality time) is really important in finding a life partner. If I had any other job, I would probably be married by now with children (I would hope).
@@abdulqaadir6510 Ok I understand what you mean now. Still, I think that there are quite a few traditional women out there - and I have a feeling there will be only more of them, because traditional is becoming the new modern. It's becoming kind of trendy. So fingers crossed for you, I wish you find your soulmate 🙂
@@frusia123 Thank you for your kind words 🙏.
@frusia123
Not in my country. None of this what you call 'traditionalism'. We prefer our autonomy.
Women will suffer greatly for their 'traditionalsm' just like they did in history
20:54 - infantilised / cushions.
22:17 - sexual dimorphism less important, so questioning meaning of gender, of which trans movement is the apex.
It’s important in sports
Andrew Tate appeals to the common impulse amongst many to celebrate pirates, the cutthroat aspects being part of the appeal. Not just 10 year old boys, either, adult women are known to suffer from hybristophobia. I happen to hate pirates my self, of course.
Who was Kaczynski? I’m making a reading list.
Ted K the Unibomber?
I don't think these two realise how many privileges are given these days to women (I know how controversial), and how this motivates some struggling men to switch gender to make their lives more appealing.
These women are also radical feminists , just wolves in sheep clothing
Blabbering will change nothing. The same as ommission of the facts which are fatal for our society.
Strong insights counter
to current orthodoxy BUT
beware tossing off JBP and
AT so casually... Makes you
seems like a piano teacher
shallowly criticizing
the 3Bs
Yes we _are_ saying you should not go in women’s single spaces
40:57 There are no solutions, only trade offs.--Thomas Sowell
Unless we want to try, what exactly, another "Final Solution"? The last one didn't work out ao well. Neither did any experiment with Communism.
And socialism doesn't appear to be looking to good in the Nordic Paradises long term either.
Is this why fedora guys were seen negatively once, long ago? 😂
No he hasnt and the evidence shows it ls false yall are just mad that the man was successful
Bloody bass thought this was a mgtow video. Cya!
♀Venus maiden
☽ Moon mother
♄ Saturn matriarch
♂ Mars son
☉ Sun father
♃ Jupiter patriarch
the archetypal pattern here is quite fascinating. each stage goes from the I to We to All Perspective, except for ☽ Moon Mother. here instead of a shift in perspective there’s a shift in element. the masculine stages are all 🜂 Fire and the feminine are all 🜃 Earth except for the ☽ Moon which is I 🜄 Water. this is the female going from I 🜃 Earth Maiden Body and the 5 senses to We 🜄 Water Mother Soul and self intuiting. The Mother doesn’t love the family like Father as an Other but as an extension of the self. she expands her ‘I’ to the familiars. then, when she loses her ☽ Moon in menopause, she reverts back to practical 🜃 Earth but for the extended family, from body to home to house/estate.
IndividualISM/Selfishness is capitalist world view .
why is this woman sitting in the dark?
I think it's visually really stylish & effective
A little friendly suggestion. With your lighting; backgroud (coal black); etc. You like a bit like a disembodied head, a li'l disturbing. Maybe reconsider your lighting/background, whatever might reduce the "disembodied" effect...fwiw...
I quite like it…it is a bit Chris Williams-y.
I like it
Au contraire, both that and her beautiful soft voice make her stand out in an online world of loudness and brightness.
Sorry can anyone tell me what happened? I was distracted and lost in Louise’s eyes
@@vivienneb6199 to you maybe
I think Patriarchy is good if the fathers are righteous.
It's not just good. It's the only option.
@@zeno2501 Agreed
What's good for the goose is good for the gander: if Perry is going to call her podcast "Maiden Mother *Matriarch* " and expect that to be regarded positively, then men have every right to claim a positive regard for the notion of a Patriarch.
@@tommygriffiths659 Patriarchy can never be good, and can never be an option, because men's righteousness comes from women. Males on their own have no morality and no possibility for righteousness, because women are the spiritual leaders and men are the followers. Men on their own are depraved, unstable, and amoral.
@Brigitte Courson The Natural Man is carnal, devilish, and sensual, so therefore we must "put off" the natural man. So perhaps we can agree on that. However, I would contend that reality itself is patriarchal, whether or not we realize it. I think women tend to have an emotional/spiritual awareness that men naturally do not. That is why a man and woman are able to be more together than when separated.
Why are men harder on men? Could it be they have at least partially internalised the misandry that has become so prevalent in society over the past ten years or so (especially on social media)? Similarly, perhaps the likes of Andrew Tate (of whom I am definitely no fan) have become so popular because they appear to be trying to turn back the tide of misandry?
I see you gals keep attacking the symptoms rather than the cause. It’s like a doctor telling a patient to take aspirin for a headache when the problem is a brain tumor
You can buy fancy gym shoes
nina power really should work on how to answer questions in a clear manner without all the ‘eeee you know’ was so painful to listen to throughout the hour
Sigh
🐟 25. THE ROLE OF FEMALES:
Women are fortunate because they are BORN with a job:
Daughter.
Wife.
Mother.
Females normally have no role in public life. Exceptions to this rule are relatively rare. For instance, women may work in the arts (singers, actors, and dancers, which often demand female players), or as maids or nurses, both of which are feminine duties, providing it has no detrimental effect on their PRIMARY function, as daughters, wives, and mothers.
So, a female’s fundamental role is to serve her MASTERS (any man in her family circle), even from a relatively young age, by performing domestic duties and raising her children. Barren women (heterosexual or otherwise) are extremely unfortunate, but can still devote their lives to serving their husband, father, grandfather, uncles, or in the event that none of those men are extant, adult male cousins.
Studies have shown that the more a woman deviates from this innate societal function, the less she is fulfilled. The phrase, “Cat Lady”, says it all.
As a general rule, women should be protected in the home, and never wander-out alone. They should FULLY cover their bodies in the presence of post-pubescent males outside the family circle. Even the prostitutes in some nations wear veils in public, even if out of fear of reprisal.
Having lived the eremitic life of a monastic priest for a few decades, I can attest to the importance of keeping one’s home clean and tidy. It is obvious to me that housekeeping is very much a full-time occupation, and that if I were to neglect my domestic chores, my health and comfort would greatly diminish. As would be expected of a person in my position, I follow a strict diet and am obsessive in regards to hygiene. Without a spouse, the onus is on me to maintain my residence in a prim and proper manner, even though it results in me spending less time teaching religion as a member of the Holy Priesthood (The World Teacher, in my particular case). Therefore, the role of a housewife is of PARAMOUNT importance, and must never be discounted by anybody, particularly feminist ideologues. The following chapter deals with feminism.
The ONLY reason I have resided alone for most of my adult life is due to the fact that there is a severe scarcity of decent women in my country, and indeed the entire world, what to speak of holy and righteous women. Unfortunately, few women, particularly in the more affluent nations, any longer receive adequate training in the connubial arts. In my former marriages, I was forced to perform most household chores.
In recent centuries, due to various factors (FEMINISM, in particular), women have become so degraded, that is it practically impossible to find an example of an ideal woman. Therefore, in order to reference examples of such a woman, one is forced to refer to figures from ancient myths.
Mariam, the mother of Lord Jesus Christ, and Devī Sītārānī, the wife of Śri Rāja Rāma, King of Ayodhya, are the epitome of womanhood, and ought to be the role models for each and every girl born on this planet. That is assuming, of course, that those two women were, in actual fact, the gentle, refined, humble and submissive goddesses they were portrayed to be in the archaic scriptures.
Obviously, this teaching receives an ENORMOUS amount of scorn, contempt and derision from a certain proportion of women (and also many "men"), but that is perfectly fine, because, such foolish feminists are destined to die lonely and alone, with no family surrounding them, and hopefully not transfer their adulterated genes to forthcoming generations.
In some locations in the world, STRAY COWS freely wander the urban streets, displaying their teats.
Similarly, in most locations, women wander the dangerous streets alone or in groups, displaying their bosoms and other bodily parts.
Such loose women are no better than STRAY COWS.
The TRUTH is very difficult to accept, right, Slave?
“Three things cannot be long hidden:
the sun, the moon, and the TRUTH.”
Siddhārtha Gautama (AKA The Buddha),
Aṅguttara Nikāya 3.131 (Paraphrased).
Paṭicchanna Sutta
“...encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be self-controlled, chaste, good managers of the household, kind, being submissive to their husbands, so that the word of God may not be discredited.”
*************
“Yet women will be saved through childbearing, provided they continue in faith and love and holiness, with modesty.”
*************
“Women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says.”
St. Paul of Tarsus,
Titus 2:4-5.
1 Timothy 2:15.
1 Corinthians 14:34.
15:00
sex:
the state of being either male or female in most species of metazoans. In humans, each cell nucleus contains 23 pairs of chromosomes, a total of 46 chromosomes. The first 22 pairs are called autosomes. Autosomes are homologous chromosomes, that is, chromosomes that contain the same genes (regions of DNA) in the same order along their chromosomal arms. The 23rd pair of chromosomes are called allosomes (sex chromosomes). These consist of two X chromosomes in most all females, and an X chromosome and a Y chromosome in most all males. Females, therefore, have 23 homologous chromosome pairs, while males have 22. The X and Y chromosomes have small regions of homology called pseudoautosomal regions. The X chromosome is always present as the 23rd chromosome in the ovum, while either an X or Y chromosome may be present in an individual spermatozoon cell gamete.
An extremely minute percentage of humans are either (anatomical) hermaphrodites or of indeterminate sex (or to be more accurate, disordered sex). That does not negate the incontrovertible FACT that there are but two sexes/genders. In order for reproduction to take place, there is the requirement of a female ovum and a male sperm to unite, and because the entire purpose of the gender/sex division of most species of animals is to enable procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the individual in question. There is no third gamete. Cf. “gender”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
If the reader is curious to know the reason for this term being included in the glossary of “F.I.S.H” (apart from the fact that it is actually used in a handful of chapters), it is because, in recent times, LEFTISTS have been desperately trying to change the meaning of the words “sex” and “gender”, in order to serve their immensely-perverse agenda to destroy civil society with their hateful, wicked, immoral ideologies, especially by promoting the nonsensical idea that a person is able to transition from one gender to the other.
gender:
the status of being either male or female, and because the entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no extant third gamete. An extremely minute percentage of humans are either “intersex” (typically referring to those who are anatomical hermaphrodites) or of indeterminate gender (that is, not easily determined by a cursory inspection of the external genitalia), but that does not negate the incontrovertible scientific fact that there are only two genders. As far as we know, there has never existed a single human being with the ability to BOTH conceive a child in his/her womb and, simultaneously, successfully inseminate a woman (or in more disturbing terms, for a hermaphrodite to inseminate him/herself). And even if such an individual has existed, that person would be a combination of BOTH male and female, and not some imaginary, novel third gender.
Cf. “sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema.
If the reader is curious to know why this term is included in the glossary of “F.I.S.H” (apart from the fact that it is actually used in a handful of chapters), it is because leftists have been desperately trying to change the meaning of the word in recent times, in order to serve their immensely-perverse agenda to destroy civil society with their hateful, wicked, sinful, objectively-immoral ideologies.
Until relatively recently, the word “gender” has ALWAYS been used in the etymologically-accurate sense of the term, and even in the former case, predominantly where leftist ideologues comprise a significant proportion of the population. See also “leftism”.
It’s a comment section. Not an article section.
@@trobins4473, Good Girl! 👌
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Wow, and it is just a comment , i wonder what ur channel might have for us😂😂😂
@@amanar.1658, kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
Oh yeah, wahmen talking about what men want😂
Trans women are beautiful and inspiring
Get a grip
@@Ssm19494 it's ok to come out
mmmm
Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱