Yes, it's quite incredible that a terrible frustrated female barbie criminal gangmember # 3604 complete with her blue line flag sign had to make sure the handcuffs were so tight that they left marks when they were finally taken off, and during all the time that this "would be-could be" terrorist was cuffed she had to physically hold on to him, how sick do you have to be to behave like that ? 4 cars and six "officers" was barely enough to keep this extremely dangerous guy with a camera under control, great respect for the self control of the victim, and no respect whatsoever for the useless and ridiculous actions of our "saviors" the blue line gangmembers of the police.
The only thing that sucks about the legal system in the UK…the go to play is terrorism and the 🇺🇸 is disorderly conduct when the blue Isis domestic terrorist murderers cells have nothing!
As a kid i once reported for an old man bleeding from his head and laying down unconcious under my window in my street...they told me to not worry and its gonna be fine. True story (they never came by to take a look)
Where are they when a crime is being committed (nowhere to be seen) Then they wonder why the public distrust them and hate them. Complete waste of tax payers money
As a truck driver, all that i can think about is how they parked in a way that makes it very inconvenient for the chap in the truck to leave. Very thoughtless of them.
Don't you know its all the photographer's fault. He made them park like that. Better get on the side of your authoritative masters otherwise expect more inconvenience.
@@mojo6098 you also have the Arabs a lot in the US? I thought that's a European thing and you guys mainly worry about Latin American immigration. I know there's a lot of intercontinental migration crossing the southern border and Biden flying them in. But are the numbers already reaching German levels?
Well said! Sums up the state of things these days, not just in the UK but worldwide. So many people don't have any brain cells these days, smart, honest and sensible/logical people like yourself are the minority. It's a sad state of affairs now. Sigh..
@@michaelfulthorpe1910 They can't help it, it's the nature of the beast! If they weren't harassing and abusing members of the public they'd have nothing to do! They've quota hired all these Karens, and everyone knows that there's nothing more dangerous, more shrill than an idle, bored Karen. Their choice is either inflict their Karens on society or suffer. And we all know that THEY aren't going to suffer anything, if they can avoid it!
Law needs changing , they need to be personally liable and subject to their own internal disciplinary imho . We might then see some positive changes until then we are on a slippery slope. It’s only from solid camera evidence It’s clear what is going on. In a few years I’m sure BBC will run a documentary and then MPs will notice and call for change
Don't police ever read memos? What about the memo from the NPCC stating that public photography is not "hostile surveillance" and that it is a perfect legal and lawful activity? This makes me so angry.
You can write as many memos or laws as you want. The UK failed to produce a written Constitution in deference to the royal family. A very stupid decision because anything less written down is toilet paper.
I'm now starting to think the police were told to disregard the memo from NPCC because it's just for public optics. They are fully encouraged by their bosses to trample on civil liberties and told the memo is just for 'show'!
The only reason she gave for the search was because you were wearing a face covering.... 12 months ago, they were arresting us for NOT wearing one 🤦♂️
A woman on the radio saying it took the rozzas 9 weeks to turn up and investigate her burglary.....😡😡 And with numerous amounts of their colleagues under investigation for rape ,sexual assault and god knows what .They really have shot themselves in the foot......what happened to probable cause 🤔🤔🤔
Funny that some people don't get searched, the west has been taken over by a bunch of international zionist bankers , its time to take back our central banks from these psychopaths once and for all, watch Europa the last battle.
In the US, in order to justify a detention, an officer must be able to articulate specific facts that lead to a reasonable suspicion that the suspect is involved in criminal activity. Apparently, they do things differently in the UK...
That's not the British flag on her uniform but it's a political statement. She should be fired right away. But I honestly thought the US cops were the worst but it's the British instead. And that remark 'we can start here all day, just proves there's not a shortage of cops but way to much.
This is absolutely insane that cops thinks they can detain, handcuff, and involuntarily search for a person standing out in public filming. So bizarre and scary! The complete distain for a citizen displayed in the cops comment about the auditor not having anything better to do because he was standing out videoing is so very telling! The snotty little bits about "you watch too much American TV" and other unprofessional comments demonstrate the lack of self control those cops had. This is appalling that this is done.
"This is absolutely insane that cops thinks they can detain, handcuff, and involuntarily search for a person standing out in public filming." I don't understand. There's no question of them "thinking" they can do it. They obviously CAN do it. They did it. Past tense. End of story. What's the recourse?
Idiot needs to learn the law. Thinks because someone has phoned in they can detain anyone they want. Reasonable suspicion of a crime is required to stop and search unless a s60 is in place at the time.
When she said this ain't america, should have responded with "I know, that's why you'll be getting sued personally, unlike in America you don't have immunity from civil claims".
Lockpicking is extraordinarily unusual for burglary, to the point where police utterly dismiss the idea of thieves entering locked property without breaking in and using lockpicks. But does that stop them searching people they don't like for lockpicks? No. The search is the vicarious punishment.
My car was stolen last year…. Nobody even bothered coming out. I got told ‘they’d put a call out but not to hold out much hope’ and given a crime number. Nobody even bothered coming out…… I can see why, they were all busy doing a stop/search on somebody maliciously doing something completely legal in a place that they are allowed to be 🙄
Six police people, three police vehicles, sent to attend an incident where no crime has actually been committed. All at the tax payers expense. An utterly embarrassing scenario for the police service.
6 X officers, 4 X Cars, handcuffed and searched all for the audacity of filming a building from a public space with a face-covering on. Somewhere within a few miles of this circus someone has been criminally abused and is vainly waiting on the police turning up to assist. ...and to top it off, that foul "Police Officer" then goes on to threaten OP for again, having the audacity to question and criticise these fools. No re-training required here, these fools are beyond that, should be dismissed. Sorry OP, the male officer wasn't sound, he participated in abusing you!
Yeah.... Having a monarchy is a hairs breadth away from being a dictatorship, they can literally create or amend laws that we everyday citizens can't, thet are protected by bodyguards, an army, a police force, we literally give this one family millions a year to live a life of opulence, while they protect their criminal siblings and friends, it's disgusting.
@@WSmith_1984 No, having a _constitutional_ monarchy like we have in the UK _prevents_ upstart generals and/or politicians assuming the office of President and then consolidating their position as a dictator. Would you rather have the Royal Family dressing up in military uniforms for special occasions, or someone like Tony Bliar? Read what Peter Hitchens says about this and you may change your mind.
like bunch of bullies showing up to each other, not one of them understanding the law and how to use and enforce it. Police certainly know how to get public support ?
"it COULD be seen as terrorism" "But you wouldn't be here if you thought I was a terrorist" "No, but we COULD see this as terrorism" It's such a blatant threat to fraudulently treat him as a terrorist to coerce him to give up his rights.
He wasn't professional at all. Ultimately he is the one carrying out the search so should have been satisfied that there were sufficient grounds to do so before doing it which there were not.
No point at all. They did nothing wrong. It was the attitude that needed adjusting, especially blondie's 😒 How are the public expected to respect the police with officers like her in the force. She was gagging for a reason to arrest.
Not much chance of winning as they said the report came in as someone wearing a balaclava. A mask that covers everything except the eyes. What I find ironic is that if you are wearing this, you can be identified by the police. I you are not covering your face they can't ID you. LOL
@@isking1715 1. the search lacked reasonable grounds 2. breach of pace code a 3.2, force must be used as a last resort, force includes handcuffs. 3. lied about needing name for fort
@@Armed-Forever Yeah I get that but have you ever tried to take legal action here? I'm telling you, most you'd get but highly unlikely is an internal enquiry and a letter saying they'd done nothing wrong. At best a letter from Chief Constable apologising for your inconvenience!
You have been detained under a bogus/false/inaccarate/complaint. Offered no resistance and yet have been assaulted with hand cuffs. WHY? Legally allowed? I don't think so!! Especially if they take them off again without a charge constitutes an assault. Another COUZENS in the making !!! HYPOCRITE MYSANDRIST DICKHEAD GANGSTERS exercising their power and control. You can imagine the Harpies screech if that was 3 males conducting that pre judged and clearly biased unnustified stop and search. Stand your ground now!
Note I made spelling errors due to the keyboard size large digits, arthritis, declining manipulative dexterity and a visual impairment. The space between my ears is filled with a brain that is also declining unlike the GAGGLE of LITTLE SCHOOL GIRLS who have a VOID between theirs.
Section 1 PACE 1984 - A constable may search any person, vehicle, or anything which is in or on a vehicle, if they have reasonable grounds for suspecting that they may find any, Stolen property or Prohibited articles. What are your reasonable gtounds for suspicion cuntstable?
"Because you're wearing a mask you could be going equipped" 1 It's not unlawful to wear a mask 2 They Put a mask on where's the logic. Where was the reasonable grounds. Did you put in a complaint or put in for a civil claim against the officers for abuse of power
This says it all. There out of their depth when dealing with someone who isn't afraid of them. They straight away have separated themselves from the public.
Lets not forget the female element to all of this. They aren't able to be out on the streets dealing with men. The reason they go for an arrest and cuffs, just to do their job is because they're scared and lack any sort of strength to deal with us men 😂 All 3 of them women could have been easily evaded if any man chose to run. Out of shape, little girls on power trips. Without any physical power to do anything. It could turn dangerous for them real fast and all of them know it. As do the male officers. Female officers have always been a hinderance and liability out on the streets...
It should be they are or they're not there. Plus the camera guy is just a total knob, who gets his jollies by drawing attention to himself by filming and noising up the officers in the secure knowledge there's no offence and he can't be prosecuted. He's just an arse.
£3000 minimum payout guaranteed for illegal detainment and handcuffing. That's what I've got for my last 7 claims. If it wasn't for corrupt police, I would have to get a proper job.
An absolute prime example of why the public have no respect for the police. The chief Constable of their force should be having words with them and ascertaining why PUBLIC money was waisted with three police cars and six officers dealing with someone conducting a LAWFUL activity.
@@Suge212 it was fine sending women as they knew this man wasn't any threat to anyone. They just are trying to magically create a double standard where everywhere is both public and private. Pretending someone is a threat is a vital part of their strategy of control.
I hope you sue these idiots and clowns in costume. Abuse of power They fo not know there own laws You done nothing illegal Pathetic behaviour. Good luck with you claim when you sue these idiot clowns
You can sue them all you like and nothing will change because the cops inventing laws to fit their needs, assaulting people and doing illegal searches will remain unaffected. They will still draw their salaries every month regardless. What needs to happen is.. Make the cops personally accountable for their actions and responsible for the settlements and costs from their own salaries, savings, assets or pension fund. Then watch their attitudes change. I hope to see the day when a cop loses their house and pension because of their actions and ego.
You have your face covered then puts on on a mask. Priceless. You can’t get police to attend a break in or a car theft but 4 goons can attend a man with a camera. Was it a Cannon by chance.
@@colintodd4203 He is doing a very important service. He is highlighting the utter incompetence of a lot of the police in the UK. If the police have so many officers that can come out to a man taking perfectly legal pictures on a public footpath,then they have plenty of time and officers to attend real crime scenes. Like a guy I was talking with yesterday. He had 2 cars on his drive,that some low life decided he wanted. Because the owner of them had prepared for such a crime happening he had taken precautions to make the vehicles inoperable to anyone unauthorised to drive them. Not sure how exactly,but I think it was to remove an essential component of what makes a car work? The would be thief was not amused so decided to break into the owners shed and kill the owners daughters pet Rabbit that was in a hutch in the shed by pouring paint thinners on it and setting it alight. Then poured the some on the cars before being disturbed by the owners lights coming on. The police were called,but never actually came around to his house. He sat up all night for weeks on his own waiting for the culprit to return. The police are no longer fit for purpose. Apparently they don't attend as many as 75% of burglaries in England now.
he was absolutely cooperative, perfectly explained what he was doing, and posed no danger but she still decided to cuff and search him with no legal grounds solely for punitive purposes
Surely if THREE ARMED female officers cant control a single male whos' posed zero threat without cuffing and abusing him then maybe we should start considering the possibility they're not capable of doing the job... And before anyone says that sexist... I'd say the same about a fat cop. If you cant chase a suspect, you shouldnt be in the force surely. Weve gotta have some minimum standards or at least put some incapable people in more fitting roles
The thread is in their silence but then blue line it is not only in Britain England America and a few other countries are doing the blue line it is the way that they will completely take us over one day and shut us up so we're at their mercy don't think they're not acting Because it has been put into action
@@nathanwroe4515 Item 3 of the 10 key principles of the use force by the police service; Police officers shall, as far as possible, apply non-violent methods before resorting to any use of force. They should use force only when other methods have proved ineffective, or when it is honestly and reasonably judged that there is no realistic prospect of achieving the lawful objective identified without force. A complaint individual who is not resisting, being violent or attempting to make off should not be restrained.
Exactly. If he was the aggressive type, he'd have knocked all three spark out without even breaking sweat. I always remember seeing two female officers try and apprehend an average size guy at night. he went berserk. Both female constables screamed and squealed, and one threw her torch at him. It was beyond pathetic. The guy pretty much strolled away while the weak females got on their radio begging for male backup.
Maybe the guy doing the filming could go an a road trip. Try filming a police station in Russia or China, Mexico or Chile, Iran, South Africa, Syria, Saudi Arabia. Or even France or the USA. How do you think he would get on? Well done officers for dealing with this nuisance in a calm, professional and patient manner.
let's get this right.... are you saying what these bints did was just soft retribution.... or are you saying you believe they had just cause to suspect he was about to commit burglary? Do you believe society (and police) behaviour should be based on law, or you favour the hells angels/ woodstock style of enforcement?
@@annpeerkat2020 Society and the police should of course be governed by law. These officers had just cause to search the man under section 36 of PACE. It's unusual for a grown man to video an installation in the middle of the day. Maybe he's a burglar, maybe he's a terrorist, maybe he's a stalker. The police are not to know until they interview him. Having wasted their time, I'm not surprised that they chose to cuff him while carrying out a search. 9.30 "We are legally allowed to do so" (handcuff a suspect while carrying out a search). "We'll see" he says to the female officer. As though she were wrong. Which of course she was not. Notice he calls the female officers 'muppets' and worries that they might scratch him with their fingernails. No such insults to the male. Just a bit of gentle 'banter' with him. Typical of the sexism female officers have to put up with every day of the week. Rather like your description of the female officers as 'bints' and some of the nasty sexist comments below.
He wouldn’t last five minutes, that’s why he’s playing ‘tough guy’ with these mild-mannered officers believing, in his delusion, that he’s educating people. He wasted valuable resources generating drama for UA-cam.
@@andrewwhalley6172 It's unusual for people to show faulty thought processes in youtube videos...so maybe they should be euthanased you wally! According to your puerile logic every citiizen in every country could be considered doing something "suspicious" and be subjected to unlawful police activity. Someone with a camera is suspicious, and talking to them is the only way to make their activity non suspicious.... and you believe and support that the photographer was handcuffed "because he wasted police time?" What a wonderful grasp of law you convey with those words. In your world, police are a force of retribution, not an organisation created to uphold law, and thus protect the public's rights.... because that's why law exists isn't it? To protect the rights of people, so they live harmoniously in society. When people do their job, whatever their job, in an fair, balanced, and appropriate manner.... they earn and deserve respect. Unfortunately it's all too common for people employed in law enforcement to either have or develop a personality that revolves around personal power and ego. In their minds they are bigger than the law....they are not there to uphold it, but rather to use law to bolster their egos. This is why those muppets are often called bints and the like.... it's a description of people who are, or act like, defective personality people employed in law enforcement. It's clear to anyone but those muppets and yourself that using a camera in a public place is legal. Are you a muppet or just a bit simple? Are you a law enforcement officer, or a wannabe?
Stealth - He didn't even have a balaclava. He was wearing a face mask - The cops also wore face masks in public. Why didn't they search each other?...Following their "logic", they should have!
@@topcat1358 Sadly we didnt get to see what he was wearing, I would hazard a guess it may have been more than a simple facemask, perhaps covering more of his face/neck than a normal mask, but less than a full balaclava.. We will probably never know, he should have filmed his appearance to give a balanced view of the situation..
@@kensukadventures628 - I think you are correct, cos when he said it wasn't a balaclava they didn't argue the point. However it is NOT a crime to wear a mask NOR a balaclava! Balaclavas were manufactured to be worn in cold weather. I think ALL agreed it was a cold day.
@@user-dy7vk6un2p you have no idea of a true police state where you are shot dead for peaceful protest and women are routinely raped in custody. You are spoilt living in a such a relaxed country.
Yes, I agree. We all live in a police state controlled by overzealous tyrants who disregard all and any civil rights. Just ask Catherine Cartwright….and her psychotic female partners.
Decent claim you've got there. She put you in handcuffs because she was a small female but there's 3 off them. I would also remind the woman who said that your actions could be hostile reconnaissance should read the stop and search guidance on filming, specifically the part that FILMING ALONE is not reasonable suspicion for hostile reconnaissance.
it always the same gender that is incompetent, lazy, petit and a pity hire. The fact sheAdmits she is too weak to control him proves she shouldn;t be in the job in the first place.
The female P.C.said the photographer "matched the description" of a man who had been seen walking around in a balaclava........NOT doing anything unlawful, just taking pictures. So he was detained for matching the description of a man behaving lawfully. This is truly outrageous behaviour by the police involved. PLEASE sue them for this CLEARLY unlawful;l use of Section 1 (PACE). To invoke this Section, a Constable has to have "reasonable grounds for suspecting that he will find stolen or prohibited articles" - Her ONLY 'grounds' were that he was taking photos and was wearing a 'balaclava' - both of which are entirely Lawful, and which it is extremely unlikely a Judge would consider as "reasonable grounds". This appears a very straightforward win if taken to court.
ok i apologise for bothering you on a post from a year+ ago but you perfectly articulated what i was thinking, and i was very surprised that this guy didnt make the exact same point.
In not sure if he first said he wont consent for the search and then after he gave consent? Is it mandatory to give consent by during detention or arrest even if unlawful?
Then why are you free to write pathetic comments. If they hadn't made sacrifices we would be a Nazi state now, as we know from history how the Naziis dealt with races and ethnic groups they didn't want, one of those groups was physically and mentally disabled people and people of very low IQ, so if the Nazis were still in control here now then you would be in real trouble.
In what war exactly did Britain fight for the liberty of it's citizens? Was it one of the many colonial wars or one of the many containment wars they waged across the globe?
I've a very strong suspicion that those in their grave won't have any idea about what's going on on the surface above them as they sleep in peace! (And, yes, they're still there, not having taken a trip off to heaven or hell - and you can take my word on that!)
@@mikehawk6918 I was thinking the same thing, even WWII had nothing to do with fighting for freedom and more to do with being the biggest and best on the block, but it gets fools to die for what you want so it works.
Hostile? Terrorism? Reconnaissance? Good luck with that in court. Even a judgment thinks she's stupid. Like I said before you just can't fix or cure stupidity.
Let me just point out......its the guy who is deliberately wasting Police time. It's the police I feel sorry for. The guy is just a dick...I hope he sees this and sees the error of his ways but I doubt it. !!
So because she is too small you have to be put in chains... In the 19th and early 20th centuries most forces required that recruits be at least 5 feet 10 inches (178 cm) in height. Nottingham City Police had a minimum height requirement of 6 feet. By 1960 many forces had reduced this to 5 feet 8 inches (173 cm), and 5 feet 4 inches (163 cm) for women. Many senior officers argued that height was a vital requirement for a uniformed constable.[24] Some forces retained the height standard at 5 feet 10 inches (178 cm) or 5 feet 9 inches (175 cm) until the early 1990s. In May 1990, the minimum height requirement was dropped by the Metropolitan Police, and other police forces had followed suit by September 1990. No British force now requires its recruits to be of any minimum height. The MacPherson report of 1999 recommended against height restrictions, arguing that they may discriminate against those of ethnic backgrounds who are genetically predisposed to be shorter than average.[25] The shortest officer in the UK, PC Sue Day of Wiltshire Police, is 4 feet 10 inches (147 cm) tall.[26] The tallest is PC Anthony Wallyn of the Metropolitan Police who is 7 feet 2 inches (218 cm) tall.[27] Both officers had to have their uniforms specially made for them due to their size (Wikipedia)
Kev - If the cops retained the height restrictions you mention initially - they wouldn't need the fancy handcuffs, metal batons, tasers, pepper sprays, CS sprays, body armour, etc. ......In the Dixon of Dock Green days, with the height requirements, and the women cops dealing with lost children, etc the men patrolled with only a wooden club about 15" long. None of the stuff I mention was needed. So much for "progress"!
Lol height has 0 to do with strength and power They should just institute a minimum raw 137 kg bench and this would weed out all the femaies and subpar males
@@lockandloadlikehell - I know there's a lot of small strong guys - but they are usually gym-going, steroid pumped guys suffering from small-man syndrome, so their attitude and demeanour are "off". Usually adopt UA-cam monikers like yours, to try and impress how tough they are. LOL!
@@SeentySeen - You sound like a REALLY tough guy, sadly suffering from small-man syndrome. Obviously there are exceptions to the rule, and you may be one - but generally speaking big guys have "presence" and get respect and compliance without the willie-swinging hard man talk.
This is why England needs 10.000 more police. Only 4 cars and 6 police were available to attend this critical incident. 🇬🇧
Clearly they are short staffed and too busy to attend burglary and the mass abuse of underage girls
Obviously more training is needed, because then even more will be needed.
These insidents threaten their construct of England more than rape, murder, theft, or terrorism.
Wales!
This is in Wales
Nice to see the Gestapo doing a sterling job in our police state.
The Gestapo did nothing like this, they wanted things as quiet as can be. The SA on the other hand.
Yes, it's quite incredible that a terrible frustrated female barbie criminal gangmember # 3604 complete with her blue line flag sign had to make sure the handcuffs were so tight that they left marks when they were finally taken off, and during all the time that this "would be-could be" terrorist was cuffed she had to physically hold on to him, how sick do you have to be to behave like that ? 4 cars and six "officers" was barely enough to keep this extremely dangerous guy with a camera under control, great respect for the self control of the victim, and no respect whatsoever for the useless and ridiculous actions of our "saviors" the blue line gangmembers of the police.
In Hollywood depiction perhaps , in real life this is exactly the NKVD
No this is Colonial Imperialist "progress" coming home to the motherland. Enjoy!
The only thing that sucks about the legal system in the UK…the go to play is terrorism and the 🇺🇸 is disorderly conduct when the blue Isis domestic terrorist murderers cells have nothing!
My house has been burgled....we'll be there in 3 weeks sir.
👮♀️ well there’s no point in us coming anymore is there sir. Happy shopping for new furniture 👍
If people like this idiot didn't waste police time, they would have more time to deal with real crime.
As a kid i once reported for an old man bleeding from his head and laying down unconcious under my window in my street...they told me to not worry and its gonna be fine. True story (they never came by to take a look)
That’s if they do come but something tells me otherwise
Becausse they are all tied up on time wasters like this dude and helping dementia sufferers
This is all about dominance and the perception of control whilst trying to ascertain your identity
Where are they when a crime is being committed (nowhere to be seen) Then they wonder why the public distrust them and hate them. Complete waste of tax payers money
Maybe they are busy dealing with nonesens like this.
Exactly wasting their time when they should be dealing with crimes@@Regnet35
As a truck driver, all that i can think about is how they parked in a way that makes it very inconvenient for the chap in the truck to leave. Very thoughtless of them.
Hey. Give them some respect. They put a lot of thought into parking like a knob.
Don't you know its all the photographer's fault. He made them park like that. Better get on the side of your authoritative masters otherwise expect more inconvenience.
THeY HaVE ThE LiGhTS On!!
Had we lost WW2, these officers would have blended in quite well.
🙄
❤❤❤
Had we 'lost' the country would be in a much better shape. I'd much rather speak German than the incoming Arabic.
@@mojo6098 you also have the Arabs a lot in the US? I thought that's a European thing and you guys mainly worry about Latin American immigration. I know there's a lot of intercontinental migration crossing the southern border and Biden flying them in.
But are the numbers already reaching German levels?
What an absolute joke of a corrupt shithole this country as turned into ....ffs
Detained because he had a face covering, they then put on their own face coverings.
I was thinking that my self
Well said! Sums up the state of things these days, not just in the UK but worldwide. So many people don't have any brain cells these days, smart, honest and sensible/logical people like yourself are the minority. It's a sad state of affairs now. Sigh..
😊 TV
Could have a disability EA2010
Good to see the Police are keeping public relations at a high level.
Pigs being pigs again!!
The male cop fondled the man immediately after he was shackled. Hmmmm?
Police were summoned by the public.
@@michaelfulthorpe1910
They can't help it, it's the nature of the beast!
If they weren't harassing and abusing members of the public they'd have nothing to do!
They've quota hired all these Karens, and everyone knows that there's nothing more dangerous, more shrill than an idle, bored Karen. Their choice is either inflict their Karens on society or suffer. And we all know that THEY aren't going to suffer anything, if they can avoid it!
Cant tell if sarcasm or not? They were extremely polite, you should hear the police up north if you think these were bad
I remember this; The Theatre of Misconduct performed by your local Police. What was the outcome of this spurious search, presuming you made a claim?
Women in uniform on a power trip..
It would be a very different story if the payout that'll be forthcoming is from the individual officer's pocket.
Yeah they would think thrice before exerting their baseless accusations.
Law needs changing , they need to be personally liable and subject to their own internal disciplinary imho . We might then see some positive changes until then we are on a slippery slope. It’s only from solid camera evidence It’s clear what is going on. In a few years I’m sure BBC will run a documentary and then MPs will notice and call for change
Don't police ever read memos? What about the memo from the NPCC stating that public photography is not "hostile surveillance" and that it is a perfect legal and lawful activity? This makes me so angry.
You can write as many memos or laws as you want. The UK failed to produce a written Constitution in deference to the royal family. A very stupid decision because anything less written down is toilet paper.
I'm now starting to think the police were told to disregard the memo from NPCC because it's just for public optics. They are fully encouraged by their bosses to trample on civil liberties and told the memo is just for 'show'!
But he was wearing a balaclava. 🤣
Your rights don't matter to the blue mafia.
Should have had a copy of the memo in your pocket for them to read as you were searched
The only reason she gave for the search was because you were wearing a face covering....
12 months ago, they were arresting us for NOT wearing one 🤦♂️
Looooooool 🤣🤣You should do stand up👍✌️🌈👌…..
And she then puts one on for the search lol Can't make it up!
👏agreed x
Wonder if they stop and search a certain ethnic group of females in Bradford for having their face covered...?
JUST shows how much the plandemic was
A woman on the radio saying it took the rozzas 9 weeks to turn up and investigate her burglary.....😡😡 And with numerous amounts of their colleagues under investigation for rape ,sexual assault and god knows what .They really have shot themselves in the foot......what happened to probable cause 🤔🤔🤔
If they investigate a burglary they will probably be lumbered with more paperwork to fill in. Cops don't like paperwork!
Ya easy to explain. They’re lazy cowards. They do this stuff so they don’t have to do real work or deal with real criminals. Which could be dangerous
searching pockets for crowbars, thats the best yet
Yeah I always keep my 1 m long crowbar in my back pocket.
keep it in your front pocket , gives them something to think about when they pat you down.@@DerekNielsen-bg7mc
Funny that some people don't get searched, the west has been taken over by a bunch of international zionist bankers , its time to take back our central banks from these psychopaths once and for all, watch Europa the last battle.
They make it so easy to detest them. Some cracking lines in this though 👊😂
You will love them for your next vid lol.
It’s not just the cops that are jokes in these countries. It’s the whole government.
Ment=Mind
And the royals
Yes but just remember that they have the guns and the prisons - suddenly it's not that funny.
maybe you should try other countries and see what u got....
@The Collective Minds Podcast. Just look at who is the Home Secretary!
He’s being searched because he’s wearing a face covering and all the officers are wearing face coverings😅😅
In the US, in order to justify a detention, an officer must be able to articulate specific facts that lead to a reasonable suspicion that the suspect is involved in criminal activity.
Apparently, they do things differently in the UK...
like guns yeah ?
US laws don't apply in England, likewise British laws don't apply in the US........
@@mickg8306😂😂😂
@@guiltseeker😂
@@mickg8306 actually they are very similar
So once again the only people who should be in handcuffs are the people who are putting you in handcuffs...
Explain kev
@@alexcrawford6983 if you don't know I'm not telling you
Best think you did was laugh at them. Deflated their egos and showed them they could not intimidate.
It always upsets leses
@@cliffordbuttle4529
Homophobic, by chance?
10:34 *" y o u c a n f i l m w h a t e v e r y o u w a n t"* !!?!!
from the man who just searched a man for F I L M I N G ...
That's not the British flag on her uniform but it's a political statement. She should be fired right away. But I honestly thought the US cops were the worst but it's the British instead. And that remark 'we can start here all day, just proves there's not a shortage of cops but way to much.
*stand here *too much 📚
This is absolutely insane that cops thinks they can detain, handcuff, and involuntarily search for a person standing out in public filming. So bizarre and scary! The complete distain for a citizen displayed in the cops comment about the auditor not having anything better to do because he was standing out videoing is so very telling! The snotty little bits about "you watch too much American TV" and other unprofessional comments demonstrate the lack of self control those cops had. This is appalling that this is done.
"This is absolutely insane that cops thinks they can detain, handcuff, and involuntarily search for a person standing out in public filming." I don't understand. There's no question of them "thinking" they can do it. They obviously CAN do it. They did it. Past tense. End of story. What's the recourse?
Idiot needs to learn the law. Thinks because someone has phoned in they can detain anyone they want. Reasonable suspicion of a crime is required to stop and search unless a s60 is in place at the time.
When she said this ain't america, should have responded with "I know, that's why you'll be getting sued personally, unlike in America you don't have immunity from civil claims".
Gangsters
lawsuit
How do they expect you to hide a huge crowbar, or items for burglary, in tiny little pockets? Inspector Gadget?
It's really not that difficult to pick locks so you only need a couple of pieces of small metal
Lockpicking is extraordinarily unusual for burglary, to the point where police utterly dismiss the idea of thieves entering locked property without breaking in and using lockpicks. But does that stop them searching people they don't like for lockpicks? No. The search is the vicarious punishment.
Don't knock it Lisa...top entertainment 🤣😂
I use inflatable crowbars
anybody else agree that women should not be allowed to be police officers now, their bad attitude towards males is so blatantly obvious
My car was stolen last year…. Nobody even bothered coming out. I got told ‘they’d put a call out but not to hold out much hope’ and given a crime number. Nobody even bothered coming out…… I can see why, they were all busy doing a stop/search on somebody maliciously doing something completely legal in a place that they are allowed to be 🙄
Six police people, three police vehicles, sent to attend an incident where no crime has actually been committed. All at the tax payers expense. An utterly embarrassing scenario for the police service.
Corporate thugs.
6 X officers, 4 X Cars, handcuffed and searched all for the audacity of filming a building from a public space with a face-covering on. Somewhere within a few miles of this circus someone has been criminally abused and is vainly waiting on the police turning up to assist. ...and to top it off, that foul "Police Officer" then goes on to threaten OP for again, having the audacity to question and criticise these fools. No re-training required here, these fools are beyond that, should be dismissed.
Sorry OP, the male officer wasn't sound, he participated in abusing you!
Yeah....
Having a monarchy is a hairs breadth away from being a dictatorship, they can literally create or amend laws that we everyday citizens can't, thet are protected by bodyguards, an army, a police force, we literally give this one family millions a year to live a life of opulence, while they protect their criminal siblings and friends, it's disgusting.
And of course, the police officers put on their face coverings
it always the same gender that is incompetent, lazy, petit and a pity hire.
@@WSmith_1984 No, having a _constitutional_ monarchy like we have in the UK _prevents_ upstart generals and/or politicians assuming the office of President and then consolidating their position as a dictator. Would you rather have the Royal Family dressing up in military uniforms for special occasions, or someone like Tony Bliar? Read what Peter Hitchens says about this and you may change your mind.
Thousands of girls getting abused and thousands of illegal criminals arriving every week. But they are ignored by these muppets
like bunch of bullies showing up to each other, not one of them understanding the law and how to use and enforce it. Police certainly know how to get public support ?
"it COULD be seen as terrorism"
"But you wouldn't be here if you thought I was a terrorist"
"No, but we COULD see this as terrorism"
It's such a blatant threat to fraudulently treat him as a terrorist to coerce him to give up his rights.
How did they bully him? By making enquirys caused by his look at me attention seeking pathetic way of getting his 15 mins of fame.. sad person.
5% crime solved these ladies havnt got a clue
I bet they were shocked that they didn't find any crow bars in your pockets......
"Power does what it wants, and now they're just more naked about it." -George Carlin
Carlin was a bum.
( Rogue nation) uses that as well .👍
For the blonde copper, beauty fades dumbness lasts
Seems like entry IQ for police is less than 80.
Except these Muppets probably have that between them.
The little blonde girl is full of it. What a bloody shower!
That sow has never known beauty
Haha where’s the beauty
Her father banged a Labrador.
That male cop was professional, shame about the women.
It's because they both have dog poo bags in their pockets
He wasn't professional at all. Ultimately he is the one carrying out the search so should have been satisfied that there were sufficient grounds to do so before doing it which there were not.
were they women? one near the end had some very he\him vibes about him\her....
Tampax syndrome
They looked no older than fifteen.
If your house was being burgled, they'd be nowhere to be seen.
PLEASE file a lawsuit. Don’t let them get away with this or they will do it again.
No point at all. They did nothing wrong. It was the attitude that needed adjusting, especially blondie's 😒 How are the public expected to respect the police with officers like her in the force. She was gagging for a reason to arrest.
Not much chance of winning as they said the report came in as someone wearing a balaclava. A mask that covers everything except the eyes. What I find ironic is that if you are wearing this, you can be identified by the police. I you are not covering your face they can't ID you. LOL
@@isking1715 1. the search lacked reasonable grounds 2. breach of pace code a 3.2, force must be used as a last resort, force includes handcuffs. 3. lied about needing name for fort
@@Armed-Forever Yeah I get that but have you ever tried to take legal action here? I'm telling you, most you'd get but highly unlikely is an internal enquiry and a letter saying they'd done nothing wrong. At best a letter from Chief Constable apologising for your inconvenience!
@@isking1715 i’ve sued them b4 and won over 7.8k so far with more claims pending, crimebodge helped me initially he’s got a channel
The joy you can hear in their voices when they say "we don't need your concent" should tell us all we need to know.
Spell check required
and why we have a wonderful Constitution
You have been detained under a bogus/false/inaccarate/complaint. Offered no resistance and yet have been assaulted with hand cuffs. WHY? Legally allowed? I don't think so!! Especially if they take them off again without a charge constitutes an assault. Another COUZENS in the making !!! HYPOCRITE MYSANDRIST DICKHEAD GANGSTERS exercising their power and control. You can imagine the Harpies screech if that was 3 males conducting that pre judged and clearly biased unnustified stop and search. Stand your ground now!
Note I made spelling errors due to the keyboard size large digits, arthritis, declining manipulative dexterity and a visual impairment. The space between my ears is filled with a brain that is also declining unlike the GAGGLE of LITTLE SCHOOL GIRLS who have a VOID between theirs.
4 Police for a camera
Section 1 PACE 1984 - A constable may search any person, vehicle, or anything which is in or on a vehicle, if they have reasonable grounds for suspecting that they may find any, Stolen property or Prohibited articles.
What are your reasonable gtounds for suspicion cuntstable?
"ive had enough of you now, off you pop" lmfao
"Because you're wearing a mask you could be going equipped" 1 It's not unlawful to wear a mask 2 They Put a mask on where's the logic. Where was the reasonable grounds. Did you put in a complaint or put in for a civil claim against the officers for abuse of power
4 cars and 6 dipsticks.
Ten out of ten ain't bad lool
This says it all. There out of their depth when dealing with someone who isn't afraid of them. They straight away have separated themselves from the public.
Lets not forget the female element to all of this. They aren't able to be out on the streets dealing with men. The reason they go for an arrest and cuffs, just to do their job is because they're scared and lack any sort of strength to deal with us men 😂 All 3 of them women could have been easily evaded if any man chose to run. Out of shape, little girls on power trips. Without any physical power to do anything. It could turn dangerous for them real fast and all of them know it. As do the male officers. Female officers have always been a hinderance and liability out on the streets...
It should be they are or they're not there. Plus the camera guy is just a total knob, who gets his jollies by drawing attention to himself by filming and noising up the officers in the secure knowledge there's no offence and he can't be prosecuted. He's just an arse.
@@BillyCairns-dk5ir Quite agree with you there
wanka with a camera@@BillyCairns-dk5ir
@@BillyCairns-dk5irwell said 👍
These kind of guys are the ones who got bullied in school
🥱
Another drama queen
Has behaving like a knob to wind up police
@@winniepeg2020 how does the leather taste
£3000 minimum payout guaranteed for illegal detainment and handcuffing. That's what I've got for my last 7 claims. If it wasn't for corrupt police, I would have to get a proper job.
Hmm, the public like me pays for this through our taxes. I hope you are happy with yourself commenting that.
lol
@@coops1964 Complain to plod, not him.
I somehow do not think this is real.
I'm just so amazed at how these officers treated a member of the public. Seems our UK partners are even more of a tyrant.
It’s the way they behave in the bedrooms
History sure agrees
Try living in texas
@@entheogenocide History disagrees. The UK outlawed slavery 90 years before you did.
If there’s a person dead how do they give their name 😂 great analogy 🤦🏻♂️
An absolute prime example of why the public have no respect for the police.
The chief Constable of their force should be having words with them and ascertaining why PUBLIC money was waisted with three police cars and six officers dealing with someone
conducting a LAWFUL activity.
She acted like she was alone when she said "you are quit big and I'm a female" .... they outnumbered him 3 to 1 and treated him like he was the threat
Yeah but even being outnumbered, he could have overpowered all of them easily. I'm shocked they send unarmed females to do police work.
She just gave a good reason why there should not be 3 women turning up to a job and why women are not capable of being an officiant constable.
@@Suge212 it was fine sending women as they knew this man wasn't any threat to anyone. They just are trying to magically create a double standard where everywhere is both public and private. Pretending someone is a threat is a vital part of their strategy of control.
@@forthfarean there must not have been any domestic disputes going on at the time. That's where they send the female officers
@@ArtStoneUS They were all there trying to abuse the public instead of their partners.
Everything wrong with policing today in 3 minutes.
This looks like a Benny Hill comedy sketch but the taxpayer ain't laughing.
"Hostile reconnaissance towards terrorism offences" Lmfao.
Handcuffed by three birds, lucky boy🤣🤣
Still can't believe that happened to you... Hope you got them done for a false detainment and unwarranted search 👊
I hope you sue these idiots and clowns in costume.
Abuse of power
They fo not know there own laws
You done nothing illegal
Pathetic behaviour.
Good luck with you claim when you sue these idiot clowns
Funking idiots abuse of power
Pathetic in this day and age
What muppets
You can sue them all you like and nothing will change because the cops inventing laws to fit their needs, assaulting people and doing illegal searches will remain unaffected.
They will still draw their salaries every month regardless.
What needs to happen is.. Make the cops personally accountable for their actions and responsible for the settlements and costs from their own salaries, savings, assets or pension fund.
Then watch their attitudes change.
I hope to see the day when a cop loses their house and pension because of their actions and ego.
@steven moseley exactly they are public servants not enforcement officers
@@sahhull I pray we see that day but I'm unfortunately doubt it. But how things would change!
Should have said that you had 200 grand for your mortgage in your pocket , but what ended up in the bag was fifteen pounds
nice to know where the tax is been spent 😅
You have your face covered then puts on on a mask. Priceless. You can’t get police to attend a break in or a car theft but 4 goons can attend a man with a camera. Was it a Cannon by chance.
Cant attend to real breakins due to numpties like this wasting police time money and resource.
@@colintodd4203 He is doing a very important service. He is highlighting the utter incompetence of a lot of the police in the UK. If the police have so many officers that can come out to a man taking perfectly legal pictures on a public footpath,then they have plenty of time and officers to attend real crime scenes. Like a guy I was talking with yesterday. He had 2 cars on his drive,that some low life decided he wanted. Because the owner of them had prepared for such a crime happening he had taken precautions to make the vehicles inoperable to anyone unauthorised to drive them. Not sure how exactly,but I think it was to remove an essential component of what makes a car work?
The would be thief was not amused so decided to break into the owners shed and kill the owners daughters pet Rabbit that was in a hutch in the shed by pouring paint thinners on it and setting it alight. Then poured the some on the cars before being disturbed by the owners lights coming on.
The police were called,but never actually came around to his house. He sat up all night for weeks on his own waiting for the culprit to return. The police are no longer fit for purpose.
Apparently they don't attend as many as 75% of burglaries in England now.
@@colintodd4203 shut it you little Todd the plod!!
@@colintodd4203 you a prick pig by chance??
Break ins and car theft are not immediate things they’ve already happened. What do you expect them to do seriously
he was absolutely cooperative, perfectly explained what he was doing, and posed no danger but she still decided to cuff and search him with no legal grounds solely for punitive purposes
Surely if THREE ARMED female officers cant control a single male whos' posed zero threat without cuffing and abusing him then maybe we should start considering the possibility they're not capable of doing the job...
And before anyone says that sexist... I'd say the same about a fat cop. If you cant chase a suspect, you shouldnt be in the force surely. Weve gotta have some minimum standards or at least put some incapable people in more fitting roles
The ponytailed quota hires strike again!
The thread is in their silence but then blue line it is not only in Britain England America and a few other countries are doing the blue line it is the way that they will completely take us over one day and shut us up so we're at their mercy don't think they're not acting Because it has been put into action
@@nathanwroe4515 Item 3 of the 10 key principles of the use force by the police service;
Police officers shall, as far as possible, apply non-violent methods before resorting to any use of force. They should use force only when other methods have proved ineffective, or when it is honestly and reasonably judged that there is no realistic prospect of achieving the lawful objective identified without force. A complaint individual who is not resisting, being violent or attempting to make off should not be restrained.
@@dahdidah8553 So you have absolutely ZERO experience is what you're saying? You just sit behind a keyboard and make comments?
"I'm quite a small female" - and that alone should be why she is not eployed by the police force.
You really shouldn't have let the security guard away with it!
Remember this video a comedy classic, well done sir.
the even thinner blue line ....
THREE female cops. He LET HIMSELF be cuffed and held. I don't think they realize how lucky they are that he actually is a law abiding citizen.
Exactly. If he was the aggressive type, he'd have knocked all three spark out without even breaking sweat. I always remember seeing two female officers try and apprehend an average size guy at night. he went berserk. Both female constables screamed and squealed, and one threw her torch at him. It was beyond pathetic. The guy pretty much strolled away while the weak females got on their radio begging for male backup.
I normally have to pay lot of money to have woman in uniform handcuff me and stripserch me
@@asensibleyoungman2978 youre vile mate
I work for the Police and those bobbies were embarrassing “hostile reconnaissance”😂😂😂
A blue six-pack .... gone flat foot.
Funny how the male officer didn't question the legality of the search, he just accepted their explanation which was dodgy and carried on.
Boils my blood seeing these vultures pounce on someone doing a legal activity🤬
I would never be a peace officer without the ability to have lethal force
Your brain had lethal force. It killed itself.
Maybe the guy doing the filming could go an a road trip. Try filming a police station in Russia or China, Mexico or Chile, Iran, South Africa, Syria, Saudi Arabia. Or even France or the USA. How do you think he would get on? Well done officers for dealing with this nuisance in a calm, professional and patient manner.
you sound like a total whalley?
let's get this right.... are you saying what these bints did was just soft retribution.... or are you saying you believe they had just cause to suspect he was about to commit burglary?
Do you believe society (and police) behaviour should be based on law, or you favour the hells angels/ woodstock style of enforcement?
@@annpeerkat2020 Society and the police should of course be governed by law. These officers had just cause to search the man under section 36 of PACE. It's unusual for a grown man to video an installation in the middle of the day. Maybe he's a burglar, maybe he's a terrorist, maybe he's a stalker. The police are not to know until they interview him. Having wasted their time, I'm not surprised that they chose to cuff him while carrying out a search.
9.30 "We are legally allowed to do so" (handcuff a suspect while carrying out a search). "We'll see" he says to the female officer. As though she were wrong. Which of course she was not. Notice he calls the female officers 'muppets' and worries that they might scratch him with their fingernails. No such insults to the male. Just a bit of gentle 'banter' with him. Typical of the sexism female officers have to put up with every day of the week. Rather like your description of the female officers as 'bints' and some of the nasty sexist comments below.
He wouldn’t last five minutes, that’s why he’s playing ‘tough guy’ with these mild-mannered officers believing, in his delusion, that he’s educating people. He wasted valuable resources generating drama for UA-cam.
@@andrewwhalley6172 It's unusual for people to show faulty thought processes in youtube videos...so maybe they should be euthanased you wally!
According to your puerile logic every citiizen in every country could be considered doing something "suspicious" and be subjected to unlawful police activity.
Someone with a camera is suspicious, and talking to them is the only way to make their activity non suspicious.... and you believe and support that the photographer was handcuffed "because he wasted police time?" What a wonderful grasp of law you convey with those words. In your world, police are a force of retribution, not an organisation created to uphold law, and thus protect the public's rights.... because that's why law exists isn't it? To protect the rights of people, so they live harmoniously in society.
When people do their job, whatever their job, in an fair, balanced, and appropriate manner.... they earn and deserve respect. Unfortunately it's all too common for people employed in law enforcement to either have or develop a personality that revolves around personal power and ego. In their minds they are bigger than the law....they are not there to uphold it, but rather to use law to bolster their egos.
This is why those muppets are often called bints and the like.... it's a description of people who are, or act like, defective personality people employed in law enforcement.
It's clear to anyone but those muppets and yourself that using a camera in a public place is legal. Are you a muppet or just a bit simple? Are you a law enforcement officer, or a wannabe?
Sad state of affairs when you can be searched because you are walking up and down in a balaclava.....'kin tyrants the lot of em.
Stealth - He didn't even have a balaclava. He was wearing a face mask - The cops also wore face masks in public. Why didn't they search each other?...Following their "logic", they should have!
@@topcat1358 Sadly we didnt get to see what he was wearing, I would hazard a guess it may have been more than a simple facemask, perhaps covering more of his face/neck than a normal mask, but less than a full balaclava.. We will probably never know, he should have filmed his appearance to give a balanced view of the situation..
@@kensukadventures628 - I think you are correct, cos when he said it wasn't a balaclava they didn't argue the point. However it is NOT a crime to wear a mask NOR a balaclava! Balaclavas were manufactured to be worn in cold weather. I think ALL agreed it was a cold day.
@@topcat1358 Yeah, i meant the report was for someone wearing a balaclava. Policing in the this country is now shockingly poor.
@@topcat1358 sounds like it was a neck warmer tbh
The perfect advert for everything that's wrong with police recruitment in the UK. A box-ticking, we'll take anyone policy!
no non-psychopaths need apply
Must have been a slow crime day.
WAIT! Why are they covering THEIR faces? They stopped you because you're covering YOURS.
Great job. This is why trust in the police is at an all time low. Unless this kind of behaviour is challenged, we will all end up in a police state.
you are already a police state as this video shows ..Hitler would be pleased ..
We already are in a police state, don’t be fooled we need to wake up, the police are nothing more than the establishments private army
We are in a police state
@@user-dy7vk6un2p you have no idea of a true police state where you are shot dead for peaceful protest and women are routinely raped in custody. You are spoilt living in a such a relaxed country.
Yes, I agree. We all live in a police state controlled by overzealous tyrants who disregard all and any civil rights. Just ask Catherine Cartwright….and her psychotic female partners.
Jesus the witches of eastwick turn up lol
She was fuming she got no arrest
Its always the sows that cant keep their snouts shut
Decent claim you've got there. She put you in handcuffs because she was a small female but there's 3 off them. I would also remind the woman who said that your actions could be hostile reconnaissance should read the stop and search guidance on filming, specifically the part that FILMING ALONE is not reasonable suspicion for hostile reconnaissance.
Ah , but it was also for wearing a mask ( NOT a balaclava) as reported .
He won't claim, they never do!
it always the same gender that is incompetent, lazy, petit and a pity hire. The fact sheAdmits she is too weak to control him proves she shouldn;t be in the job in the first place.
Officers need to stop snrting cocaine because its making them paranoid.
@@jase1438 AB often does, and wins. This is the easiest money I've ever seen.
The female P.C.said the photographer "matched the description" of a man who had been seen walking around in a balaclava........NOT doing anything unlawful, just taking pictures. So he was detained for matching the description of a man behaving lawfully. This is truly outrageous behaviour by the police involved. PLEASE sue them for this CLEARLY unlawful;l use of Section 1 (PACE). To invoke this Section, a Constable has to have "reasonable grounds for suspecting that he will find stolen or prohibited articles" - Her ONLY 'grounds' were that he was taking photos and was wearing a 'balaclava' - both of which are entirely Lawful, and which it is extremely unlikely a Judge would consider as "reasonable grounds". This appears a very straightforward win if taken to court.
ok i apologise for bothering you on a post from a year+ ago but you perfectly articulated what i was thinking, and i was very surprised that this guy didnt make the exact same point.
Who employs these muppets, how embarrassing..
The male copper seems ok
Orwell was an optimist. These order followers will kill on command eventually.
You made me break out in a hearty laugh! Indeed, what an optimist he was. You're 200% right, these muppets would kill on command.
THAT...SADLY IS LIKELY..VERY LIKELY...ESPECIALLY THE SWEARING COPPER WHO WILL BE FIRST WITH HIS HAND ON...THE TRIGGER
Orwell?
Each and every action has an equal and opposite reaction, physics, Newton
They don't realize how foolish they look BUT who knows how they would have reacted without being recorded !!
They CAN stand there all day, but they can't leave that car there, parked on double yellow lines.
In not sure if he first said he wont consent for the search and then after he gave consent? Is it mandatory to give consent by during detention or arrest even if unlawful?
All the people who died in the war for our liberty must be turning in their graves.
Then why are you free to write pathetic comments. If they hadn't made sacrifices we would be a Nazi state now, as we know from history how the Naziis dealt with races and ethnic groups they didn't want, one of those groups was physically and mentally disabled people and people of very low IQ, so if the Nazis were still in control here now then you would be in real trouble.
In what war exactly did Britain fight for the liberty of it's citizens? Was it one of the many colonial wars or one of the many containment wars they waged across the globe?
I've a very strong suspicion that those in their grave won't have any idea about what's going on on the surface above them as they sleep in peace! (And, yes, they're still there, not having taken a trip off to heaven or hell - and you can take my word on that!)
@@mikehawk6918 I was thinking the same thing, even WWII had nothing to do with fighting for freedom and more to do with being the biggest and best on the block, but it gets fools to die for what you want so it works.
Yeah, at sad muppets filming for youtube and wasting police time
They all look like my lesbian nana
If this muppet didn't waste so much time the police could get on with more important work.
Exactly. He’s provocative and petty.
You tell their children Internet will shame them.
Can you imagine how pissed off they were when they couldn’t find your ID in your pockets.
My thoughts exactly 😂
They know who IT is
@@lnixon236 wow you have thoughts now
Is that true , more members of the public have died in police custody in 30 yesrs than police have died being attacked in 100 years...
You don't have to produce ID here in the uk ...so far.
He said "I will press charges," she said you've been watching too much American TV you don't press charges"
Haha
I still don't understand why the police are so hostile towards people filming when they know it's going to be all over UA-cam making fools of them.
Hostile? Terrorism? Reconnaissance? Good luck with that in court. Even a judgment thinks she's stupid. Like I said before you just can't fix or cure stupidity.
They abuse Section 43 all the time. It never goes to court. They do pay out claims for abusing it though.
Why is your face covered as she puts on a face covering
No point trying to explain it to the police they are irony in paired.
Having seen quite a few of these videos its amazing how quickly the cops put their masks on when they realise they're committing an illegal act
Let me just point out......its the guy who is deliberately wasting Police time.
It's the police I feel sorry for. The guy is just a dick...I hope he sees this and sees the error of his ways but I doubt it. !!
Yes remember when the police fitted up the Guildford 4 and the Birmingham 6 ?
She put a mask on but arrested you because you had your face covered 😂😂😂😂
You clearly do not live up to your surname ....
No-one was arrested.
@@Audit-The-Auditors they were....arrest in the broad sense means to stop......they were stopped....😘
@@Audit-The-Auditors name and badge number 🐷🔫
@@graemesmith8068 No, 'arrest' is a very specific process where the person is told they are arrested. That clearly did not happen.
So because she is too small you have to be put in chains...
In the 19th and early 20th centuries most forces required that recruits be at least 5 feet 10 inches (178 cm) in height. Nottingham City Police had a minimum height requirement of 6 feet. By 1960 many forces had reduced this to 5 feet 8 inches (173 cm), and 5 feet 4 inches (163 cm) for women. Many senior officers argued that height was a vital requirement for a uniformed constable.[24] Some forces retained the height standard at 5 feet 10 inches (178 cm) or 5 feet 9 inches (175 cm) until the early 1990s. In May 1990, the minimum height requirement was dropped by the Metropolitan Police, and other police forces had followed suit by September 1990. No British force now requires its recruits to be of any minimum height.
The MacPherson report of 1999 recommended against height restrictions, arguing that they may discriminate against those of ethnic backgrounds who are genetically predisposed to be shorter than average.[25] The shortest officer in the UK, PC Sue Day of Wiltshire Police, is 4 feet 10 inches (147 cm) tall.[26] The tallest is PC Anthony Wallyn of the Metropolitan Police who is 7 feet 2 inches (218 cm) tall.[27] Both officers had to have their uniforms specially made for them due to their size (Wikipedia)
Kev - If the cops retained the height restrictions you mention initially - they wouldn't need the fancy handcuffs, metal batons, tasers, pepper sprays, CS sprays, body armour, etc. ......In the Dixon of Dock Green days, with the height requirements, and the women cops dealing with lost children, etc the men patrolled with only a wooden club about 15" long. None of the stuff I mention was needed. So much for "progress"!
Lol height has 0 to do with strength and power
They should just institute a minimum raw 137 kg bench and this would weed out all the femaies and subpar males
@@SeentySeen wait till your neck's 56 cms speaking of force to knock out
@@lockandloadlikehell - I know there's a lot of small strong guys - but they are usually gym-going, steroid pumped guys suffering from small-man syndrome, so their attitude and demeanour are "off". Usually adopt UA-cam monikers like yours, to try and impress how tough they are. LOL!
@@SeentySeen - You sound like a REALLY tough guy, sadly suffering from small-man syndrome. Obviously there are exceptions to the rule, and you may be one - but generally speaking big guys have "presence" and get respect and compliance without the willie-swinging hard man talk.
asking about what the reporter will report! 😂
this is like 19. century, right?!
If you had your head covered for religious reasons they couldn't use that as grounds.
They can't use it as grounds anyway really.
And yet they would be most likely threat
Somewhere there’s 3 men waiting for their dinner
top comment :D
@@levinski888 chuckle
Ooooooooo! You'll be in trouble with the woke crowd, the feminists, the anti misogynst brigade and Uncle Tom Cobley and all! Naughty naughty man. 🤣🤣🤣🤣