How did it do poorly? It literally did better than the Mercedes EQE, go compare the two and look how much the EQE's roof deformed compared to the ID.7.
They only test for things the manufacturer claims that the car can do - if the manufacturer doesn't say that it supports night time pedestrian protection, it just automatically fails that test :)
2:19 great overall, but why does the car not brake in this situation and instead hit the pedestrian? I mean obviously it would have the capability to brake, but it doesn't.
in the German configurator is the head and side Airbag optional (front and back) if you order the interieur package +, so the here tested version is not the base one? its sad, that safety costs extra and is not standard at such a high priced car
Cars withstand collisions well. People come second. My friend, an active ice hockey player, died in a direct collision with a wall, his liver ruptured. Lost control of his car in slippery conditions at 60 km/h.
Sad to hear but people don't come second. It's just that at a certain point the deceleration is just to strong and you can't help here. Cars must be larger to soften the decel / jerk.
Any new car should be able to get a minimum of 4 stars (5 should still be the goal) once in the B category and higher so the VW I.D series is no exception (it’s also a while still until the 1 A category city caris ready) Only Dacia still can’t even get 3 stars because they are so cheap with safety
@@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 , so what exactly are you saying? 1: Safety tech is free and Dacia is just mean that they don't want to implement it? 2: Safety tech is not free, but Dacia should implement it, sell the cars at the same low price and run the company at a loss? 3: Safety tech is not free, and they should implement it, but in order to sell cars at the same price, they should make cuts somewhere else? Maybe offer it without paint, or a dashboard? 4: Dacia should perform magic and you don't care how they do it, you just want it done because you are entitled to it? Which one is it?
@@Nuke-MarsX why ? The electric vehicles are much heavier than gas cars. If everyone buys EVs, then people would be crashing against EVs, not ICE cars. And since EVs are heavier, we need the dummy cart to represent the mass of the average EV.
Euro NCAP is not consistent, videos cannot be compared between more cars. Always a different camera shot. VW hit two pedestrians and has 83% -:), funny
The 2019 VW Golf's rear door opened during the side mobile barrier test, and it still got 5 stars, and 95% for adult ocuppants and 89% for child ocuppants, which is a sinister joke in my opinion. ua-cam.com/video/Oz6H5xyjn4Q/v-deo.html&ab_channel=EuroNCAP
Of course, the battery acts as a major structural component in many electric cars and huge source of weight. They would not perform properly in crash tests without the battery installed.
Damn this is straight up better than the EQE
super impressive
tnx for saftey
Sidepole ist very good
It scored 95% which is the highest amongst all the others recently uploaded.
Usually ele ctric car perform well the side pole
How did it do poorly? It literally did better than the Mercedes EQE, go compare the two and look how much the EQE's roof deformed compared to the ID.7.
@@EinkOLED No matter if it hit a real pole or real 2.5 ton car instead of 1000 kg air ballon
why don't all car videos show night time pedestrian tests?
They only test for things the manufacturer claims that the car can do - if the manufacturer doesn't say that it supports night time pedestrian protection, it just automatically fails that test :)
2:19 great overall, but why does the car not brake in this situation and instead hit the pedestrian? I mean obviously it would have the capability to brake, but it doesn't.
Corner. Probably not implemented? Requirement from 2029 onwards? Anyone know?
No car is 100% fault-free 🤔
That side poll, man.
thats where most electric cars shine because of the heavy and rigid battery in the floor.
ID.3 took it even better.
in the German configurator is the head and side Airbag optional (front and back) if you order the interieur package +, so the here tested version is not the base one? its sad, that safety costs extra and is not standard at such a high priced car
This is an error in the configurator, as the head, side and center airbags are also mentioned in the standard equipment.
@@raphi25895 im grün Germany. Maybe there different Versions from the car (per Region) but ncap is european. I will take a Look when i get mine
Ist immer dabei
Cars withstand collisions well. People come second. My friend, an active ice hockey player, died in a direct collision with a wall, his liver ruptured. Lost control of his car in slippery conditions at 60 km/h.
My condolences - so sad to hear that 😔
He is in a better place and in a state of wellbeing now. Good wishes to you and to your friend.
Sad to hear but people don't come second. It's just that at a certain point the deceleration is just to strong and you can't help here. Cars must be larger to soften the decel / jerk.
that's what I call desperately chasing for clout with bs
Is your point that a cars safety systems is meant to protect the car?
Add small overlap and increase the speeds of crashes and size of the oncoming car.
Can any say at what speed car crash test has done🤨🤔??
I think it’s either 64kmp or 50kph as it was in the older crash tests
Tests sound realized with that it level of charge for the battery ?
This test was published on the same date as the GTA 6 trailer
Tesla Cyber truck: Pedestrian head severed :). By design... Dont touch my Tesla!
Que legal esse carro , não matou os ocupantes!!!
Likable car
electric
Any new car should be able to get a minimum of 4 stars (5 should still be the goal) once in the B category and higher so the VW I.D series is no exception (it’s also a while still until the 1 A category city caris ready)
Only Dacia still can’t even get 3 stars because they are so cheap with safety
Would you pay 3-4k more for a Dacia with more safety tech on it? I think that increase in the price would defeat the purpose of a cheap-ish car.
There shouldn’t have to be safety cut to be cheaper to buy. Dacia should know this and it’s why I’ll pay a bit more elsewhere and 4 stars at minimum
@@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 , so what exactly are you saying?
1: Safety tech is free and Dacia is just mean that they don't want to implement it?
2: Safety tech is not free, but Dacia should implement it, sell the cars at the same low price and run the company at a loss?
3: Safety tech is not free, and they should implement it, but in order to sell cars at the same price, they should make cuts somewhere else? Maybe offer it without paint, or a dashboard?
4: Dacia should perform magic and you don't care how they do it, you just want it done because you are entitled to it?
Which one is it?
Passat predecessor.
The dummy car’s mass needs to be at least doubled to accurately represent the mass of the avg electric vehicle.
that makes 0 sense
@@Nuke-MarsX why ? The electric vehicles are much heavier than gas cars. If everyone buys EVs, then people would be crashing against EVs, not ICE cars. And since EVs are heavier, we need the dummy cart to represent the mass of the average EV.
@@LivingTheDream77 EVs are as good as nonexistent right now and, well..that's a good reason to get a EV if you're ina. EV friendly place
@@Nuke-MarsX i see alot of EVs on the roads.
@@LivingTheDream77 then you're lucky you're ina. Friendly place, that's a sign that it is way more worth it getting one too, I would, if I were you.
so were just not doing small overlap tests anymore? kinda stupid especially when new volkswagens barley have anything to crumble with at the front
Euro NCAP is not consistent, videos cannot be compared between more cars. Always a different camera shot. VW hit two pedestrians and has 83% -:), funny
The 2019 VW Golf's rear door opened during the side mobile barrier test, and it still got 5 stars, and 95% for adult ocuppants and 89% for child ocuppants, which is a sinister joke in my opinion.
ua-cam.com/video/Oz6H5xyjn4Q/v-deo.html&ab_channel=EuroNCAP
vw send 1.000.000€ to NCAP
@@Jonbe88Lol 🤣
If there are 10 tests, it works for the vulnerable road users. With 8 good ones you are at 80%
I‘m pretty sure it didn’t totally fail those as it lowered the speed of the impact
I wonder if a battery was installed during the tests
Of course, the battery acts as a major structural component in many electric cars and huge source of weight. They would not perform properly in crash tests without the battery installed.
80% for safety assist? Wow really bad. 🤣
Grille pain 🍞 🤮 👎
absolutely love this car