to clarify. libertarians do not want people to do whatever they feel like doing, they want individual freedom to be limitless unless achieving said freedom violates another's freedom.
@@asterlyons8564 you don't need to "trust large business to self regulate", most libertarians, myself included are Austrian/ classical economists and have various reasons for believing that genuine free markets are self regulating through competition and consumer preferences.
@ its a joke. I am progressive, liberal, ecologist, kind of socialist and capitalist mix, democratic, and i want freedom of religion, press, rehabilitation systems, and rights for all races sexes lgbtq plus and all religion. Free humanity.
@ParaplegicKeanuReeves It's very ironic that you see liberalism as being representative of people not being able to think for themselves when that is more of an issue dealing with the individual and their mind, not the system. Certain systems, or leaders should I say, do encourage people to be followers so the chances of revolution will be lower. But being a follower is overall an issue with the person even in that scenario.
It's because it's not describing the liberalism that they call it nowadays but classic liberalism. These days the people calling themselves "liberals", at least in America, aren't liberal. They're just progressive authoritarians, usually voting to suppress opposition, and in favor of big government in economics.
This is a good, fundamentally sound video. Anyone complaining does not understand that this is intended to simplify and dumb down each ideology to make it easily digestible. Of course it doesn’t explain nuance and complexity of each.
That requires thousands of hours of research and more after that, to articulate it into a coherent thought. Which most people don't have the time for, or are too ignorant because of their own biases and cognitive dissonance to take the other sides theories in a good faith manner.
@@winkuus I am not opposed to oversimplification but my problem with the video is that he shows clear bias with ideologies, randomly going on a tangent and criticizing libertarianism but then he doesn't do the same for other ideologies, it's just very biased and skewed with how he describes things.
@BumwichLike is reading even a small part of Rothbard or literally anyone else that hard? Go look up any prominent libertarians. Is watching like one or two videos that hard? I know most of these people really don’t like libertarians. But at least give us a good definition. Not a word about property rights mentioned. Idk, at least he didn’t also say liberal on social issues conservative on economic issues. That’s almost as bad.
@@bear3616 that part at the end is absolutely true, libertarians are obviously for complete free market but technically can have any social beliefs they want, I'm personally a libertarian who believes in conservative social values as would be considered under classical liberalism, but I wouldn't say that makes me less of a libertarian just for having a belief on what values are better for society, as long as you don't believe the government should socially engineer such values, it's still libertarianism.
I do like the generalization of each ideology however I don’t like that for some of these ideologies, they have a personal bias. If you don’t know what I’m talking about watch the video again and notice how some of them get more negatives and some more positives. It’s as if the speaker is being subjective not objective.
I've noticed that through the video as well. I understand the video is meant to simply the ideologies, but give each ideology the same treatment. There are pros and negatives to each one so stick to a basic formula throughout the video.
Yep, I already made the comment, but they are clearly a green progressive. The only two stances that they actively tried to present as morally superior.
I watched your video, and your description of socialism was solid up until you claimed that 'there will be no incentive to work.' While it's true that a classless, moneyless society is the long-term goal of socialism, it's misguided to assume that people are inherently lazy or only motivated by money. Humans are naturally creative and driven by curiosity, passion, and a desire to contribute. Do you have hobbies or interests outside of work? Those are great examples of how people engage in meaningful activities without financial incentives. Reducing human motivation to 'money or nothing' oversimplifies what truly drives us. Socialism isn’t about removing motivation-it’s about removing exploitation. People will still innovate, create, and collaborate, but without the constant pressure of tying survival to wages. I want to see a society where humans can truly thrive, and right now, that ability to thrive is bottlenecked by modern capitalism. A better world is possible.
@@frankiebrahif you never work with other people (or just never work, if you had the opportunity) you’ll literally just end up depressed, everyone wants to contribute to something. The brain benefits from helping/working with others. It’s been hardwired into us since we first put our minds together to capture or grow food.
All this video thought me is that humans don’t know to manage themselves and all our political ideologies are flawed. So everyone is wrong yet we argue who’s right?
Chapters 0:01 Liberal 1:30 Conservative 2:50 Socialist 4:47 Libertarian 6:10 Authoritarian and Totalitarian 8:16 Anarchist 9:56 Environmental and Green 11:52 Nationalist 13:41 Progressive and Radical 15:11 Global and transnational
I feel like we're leaving out that liberalism adds more government control to every aspect of life while conservatism removes government restrictions. These aren't ideological points per se but they do happen naturally because of those ideological values. For everything to be fair, someone has to control everything in liberalism, and for everything to be traditional, people have to be left to their devices in conservativism. As you can probably guess, going too far in either direction is not great.
We need more Liberal leadership in the USA. Especially towards the LGBTQ Community, like I’m not LGBTQ but damn… I can’t help but feel bad for them. Lil bro can’t handle different cultures and differences lol couldn’t be me
@JohnGutter-q5x yes they have been and they're a terrorist group they don't want equality they want superiority they're hypocritical assholes and bullies who play victim.
I'm a Socialist, and I noticed one tiny issue with the description in the video. Yes, Socialism is a classless society, but it is also a moneyless one. It would quite literally be impossible to earn equal wages because wages aren't a thing. To address the lack of an incentive to work, the incentive would simply be to first, survive, and second, because you'd be able to do whatever you want because you aren't bound by a lack of funds; whether it's for work or as a hobby; the sky's not the limit anymore. I'm not trying to sell some utopian fantasy because that simply doesn't exist. No system is perfect because humans aren't perfect, some are just better than others, like how Capitalism was a step up from Feudalism, Socialism is a step up from Capitalism.
The Problem is that usually the means to try and achieve Socialism is to hand over more power to the government And the more you give them without checks and balances or any means to hit back They will take advantage of it I am biased to be fair though, as I don't trust most politicians, especially modern ones I see them as power hungry rats who look out for themselves, not as people who serve the Public
i kept hearing about Vibrations of Manifestation by alex lane from my friends, and honestly, i thought it was just another trendy self-help book. but when they started landing jobs they thought were impossible and reconnecting with things they’re passionate about, i had to pay attention. it’s not just “be positive” stuff; it’s more about aligning with what you actually want in life. if you’re stuck or feeling off, maybe it’s the nudge you need-it’s worked for people around me.
Preciate your addition of the pros and cons of each. I think the current retardation in the political landscape is formed for two reasons: 1. Failing to see the negatives. 2. Just because a politician is currently saying the right thing doesn't mean they actually believe that thing.
It’s strange that science-the foundation of our understanding of reality-is not at the center of our political systems. Liberal, conservative, and communist ideologies have shown their flaws, yet we overlook the possibility of governance rooted in scientific principles. What could be a better way to structure society than through an ideology grounded in evidence, reason, and progress?
Well what metric would you be basing this on? The reason so many ideologies exist is because no one can agree on what is the most important thing. So what scientific principles would we be using if one side values one thing and another side values another thing?
It'd lead to a scientific dictatorship, (yes, there is such a thing) and it would still be no good. Not to men- tion people do disagree on even the most basic things, so,,,
I mean, this is what political philosophers from the Enlightenment was doing when they thought of the ideas of natural rights, popular sovereignty, religious toleration, and the idea of the nation as made up of equal citizens instead of subjects of the king. Thinkers like Locke, Rousseau, Voltaire, Montesquieu, etc were all working off of/inspired by the new ideas of reason and the scientific method popping up in the 1600s and 1700s - they were like “hey what if we could apply these ideas to government too” and boom, there’s people advocating for democratic governance
While I do think it can’t hurt to make the planet more green and plant more trees and reduce pollution and such I also think that it’s gunna be a long while before the earth is gunna be very uncomfortable to live on. Also windmills just aren’t very effective.
The Last one (globalism or wtvr) is litterally so peak! Humanity would be so much further by now, maybe even a full on type 1 or 2 civilasation! Imagine the power of all regions merging, the sheer progress humanity would achieve is immaculate!!
@@florian6808 that's your fault for expecting peace and equality from a species that has only ever excelled at fighting one another. Btw, equality is a myth. It's not real.
you ever meet those people who just seem to attract the right stuff without even trying? i found out a bunch of my friends like that all read Vibrations of Manifestation by alex lane, and now i kinda get it. it’s not about wishful thinking-it’s about aligning your energy with what you really want and trusting the process. since reading it, they’re more grounded and attracting the right people and chances into their lives. if you’re feeling like things aren’t flowing right, this might be worth a look-you never know, it could help turn things around.
6:01. That's a misconception. Libertarians do not believe there should be absolutely no laws and no consequences, that would be anarchy. Not the political ideology of anarchism, anarchy as in chaos, mayhem, what have you. Libertarians do believe, in my opinion, the same thing that Liberals do, that the Government must do for others what others cannot do for themselves, its just that Libertarians believe people are capable of doing a lot more than others would have them believe.
A system which lacks law, order & authority is anarchy. Libertarians want small governments, little to no government interference & as much personal autonomy as possible
Libertarian. He kinda fumbled the ball on our segment. We don't necessarily believe in do anything you want entirely. And then there's the take on corporations, which under libertarian government, would die without the government subsidizing
as a moderate, I believe what's morally right cause as long as you have deep respect to everyones well being for trying to live happy then we can all live in a positive environment. like for example youre black and believe in equal right, but like guns cause most 2nd amendment conservatives do, as long as you take responsibility and share your interest to a person even if they're non english speaking person, or a trump supporter respectfully then thats all that matters in a society.
Well it's hard to like eachother when one side wants to abolish my rights as a human being because I'm transgender or this or that and the other side wants to keep moving foward
Now guys let's all get along here no one needs to die unless ... joking like seriously let plz stop killing eachother over money, power and influence and maybe try fixing our problems
Libertarianism isn't "no rules" and you got close with "live and let live as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else". It's about the people having rights and that the government should just focus on keeping everything flowing correctly without infringing on the people's rights or safety. So no, there wouldn't be glitter in the water or air subscriptions because those are necessary to life. It would more so be if someone got tap water then in their own home added glitter then they would be within there right to do so. So things like the police, the FDA, and CPS would still exist to maintain the safety and public order of the government citizens. A construction company has to abide by building regulations when building home for others and a private citizen building for others has to do the same but for themselves it's fine. That issue would arise if being sold then it would have to pass a safety inspection before sale.
The only issue I have with this is how all the rightful issues stateted are seen from a lense of the people still having the same egoistic and tired mindset they currently have in a capitalistic function Yeah at the beginning it would be deficult but at least 1 or 2 generations in and ppl would have very different life hood mindsets
I honest don't have alignment with any of these political ideologies, because it very difficult to disclose facts from speculation about complex problems. Also it creates tribalism which isn't addressing the issues nor do anything because if you create a law that beneficial to your group but it will hurting the general public and that is the issue. Because at the end of day political ideologies won't matter when life through challenges at your political ideologies beliefs with reality.
not gonna lie, i thought manifestation was overhyped until a friend gave me Vibrations of Manifestation by alex lane. i wasn’t expecting much, but everyone i know who read it started making these real changes-they’re more focused, more aware of their energy, and opportunities they’ve been chasing are finally coming through. it’s not a magic answer, but it opens your eyes to what you’re putting out there. if you’re feeling stuck, it might help shift things for you too.
You've managed to say "to each according to their ability" and still somehow say we'd all be paid the same under socialism. The phrase itself tells you that your ability also dictates how much you earn. Also, socialism is collective, not state ownership. The people own the means of production. Also, Anarchism is the abolition of the state. Not the government. The video is great overall, though.
6:05 You just contradicted yourself, if libertarianism focuses on having unrestricted freedom until it reaches freedoms of others then throwing toxic waste into water is still against libertarian morals when there will be someone's property rights [ property rights also includes your body and it's health according to the idea btw ] being effected by that decision. To the extent it could be viewed as an act of aggression.
He did not contradict himself, in fact, that's how libertarian ethics work. They are just as contradictary as the capitalist system they apologize for.
@@thirdbrother4018 libertarians claim that they support individual liberty. But their economic position doesn't believe in individual liberty. Only for the proprietors who own private property, get to have liberty, while others have to slave away and be exploited by the proprietary class. This is also referred to as rugged individualism, where individualists only care about the privilege of a few over the collectivity.
@ property rights extends to your life. You choose what you're doing, you live how you want to live and the only thing that stops you from doing something are freedoms of others. Exploitation is subjective if you know how people treated work 10,20 or 50 years ago and how they treat it now. The libertarian approach to capitalism recognizes people's ability to generate property and wealth, they have a say on how to manage it and if their methods arent preferable in a competitive spectre then they're going out. What you're truly typing now is about modern oligarchy that we have today thanks to the big government getting in bed with few monopolies that control the market. You marxists have problem in understanding these differences, the state is part of the problem not the solution to the monopolization of markets and "rugged individualism".
Ah yes.. handy as a frostpunk 2 player. Adaptation soinds like conservatism with the example with the ai but when saying tradition..well it fits tradition.. but its not nessecarily moral so it fits adaptation the opposite of progression.. dont like it xD Anarchism and liberalism sounds like lawless chaos inevitable to end in crime and fail. Its less of a "bad rep" its more of a concerning flaw.
The two are very similar. The only real major difference is that with communism, private property is abolished. Beyond that, they're practically the same. At least by the standards of socialism that Marx laid out.
This felt remarkably one sided, and the video was really trying to support anarchism HARD and made a lot of assumptions about human nature and the rise of conflict in society for what was arguably the most supported ideology in the video.
good video but i think you lack understanding of socialism, the whole ‘work incentive’ problem only applies using capitalist logic. you work to contribute, not to make money.
The video tried to totally sell green environmentalism like it was the greatest thing since sliced bread while totally ignoring the fact that most green policies are totally unsustainable and are an undemocratic way of forcing socialist ideals. An example would be passing a law that all new cars sold have to be electric by a certain year, ignoring the fact that the batteries are made from lithium mined by child slave labor and that the electrical grid is already overstretched beyond capacity, and that mandating only a certain type of car goes against all principles of a free market economy
"are totally unsustainable and are an undemocratic way of forcing socialist ideals." Oh okay, you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about and just call anything you don't like "socialist". Good that we got that out of the way.
the socialism segment is not fully correct, in socialism wages are as follows: "from each according to his ability, to each according to his work" and core principle is "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need". the only inequality in socialism is the wages, you get paid based on your work value. if you're a brain surgeon, you get paid more than you'd get paid as an artist, but everyone gets healthcare and an education. your needs are taken care of aside from your personal wage.
Ok, but then, due to taxation, how much do you actually make? And if we bring this to its logical conclusion, then it will turn into Soviet Russia. If you get taxed for everything that the government provides; food, Healthcare, transportation, housing, manufacturing etc... you'd quickly reach a point where your alloted income is so low that you can't purchase the bag of bread you want or since the government provides food, they would remove capital from the picture entirely and rely on a moneyless system like food stamps. I dont think I need to explain how that can be detrimental. Not to mention, since the government chooses what to invest manpower in, you (hypothetically you're a graphic designer) will get forced into whatever field they want you to be in with little to no say in wether you want to perform said job, Carl Marx did say "from each according to their needs, to each according to their faculties." And that means that if your of able body you would be forced into hard labour. No questions. If you have a bit of land, you wouldn't be able to do anything you wanted to do with it, since the state controls land allotment and industry and blah blah blah, they would seize your assets if you made a garden or started a business; I mean it makes sense since the state has final authority on industry right? Even in democratic socialism it's the same thing, they would still seize your assets if you had more than someone else, its about equity not equality. I'm not against social policies, I think that universal Healthcare is possible and food resources for the needy are great. But I also think that those are benefits that a strong liberal society can provide if we properly manage our country's spending. I.e. not spend money on useless safe injection sites that are poorly managed and poorly implemented.
It most certainly is a socialist country. The current rulling political party is socialist. In the 2000s, the government started nationalising industries, equally distributing wealth, and offering wellfare programs. Now, it's an authoritarian hellscape because of the socialism. The main issues with socialism are that the government has to gain control over the economy and the fact that the money has to come from somewhere. You can't just equally distribute wealth and offer free stuff, that just causes people to stop working, then your economy collapses. Although socialism and communism start out a bit differently, they're very similar. And they end up at the same place, authoritarianism. Venezuela also got poorer when they started introducing socialist policies.
to clarify. libertarians do not want people to do whatever they feel like doing, they want individual freedom to be limitless unless achieving said freedom violates another's freedom.
@Creativeusername617 what is the libertarian plan for unethical businesses? History has shown that large businesses can't be trusted to self-regulate.
to clarify: libertarianism is stupid
@@asterlyons8564I think pretty much all libertarians are fine with intense rules and standards for businesses, they aren’t people just run by people
@@asterlyons8564 you don't need to "trust large business to self regulate", most libertarians, myself included are Austrian/ classical economists and have various reasons for believing that genuine free markets are self regulating through competition and consumer preferences.
@@notevan3082we are not, we literally believe in free market and laissez-faire economics.
I am pro good, anti bad.
What's good what's bad?
@ its a joke. I am progressive, liberal, ecologist, kind of socialist and capitalist mix, democratic, and i want freedom of religion, press, rehabilitation systems, and rights for all races sexes lgbtq plus and all religion. Free humanity.
@@schelßejust say politically correct
@@schelße Bro is collecting every ideology at the same time
DUDE IS OP LESGO A SANE INDIVIDUAL @@schelße
For a very brief statement on anarchism, that was remarkably accurate
Didn't expect an accurate description of anarchism. Was pleasantly surprised
It’s pretty simple to understand
Thanks a lot man, I faced a hard time understanding all ideologies which you explained in minutes. You're just awesome.
My political ideology is Geometrydashism
When I was like 14 I would say the same.
This is nothing else but childish.
My political ideology is cavemanism
@@Emanuelgamer1313_BACKUPdo you like fishsticks?
Geometrydash
I see nobody is bashing the liberalism. It was likely because the description was so accurate.
Because people can't think for themselves 💀
@ParaplegicKeanuReeves I usually wait an hour at the hospital tops and my own private room. I still only use the public system.
@ParaplegicKeanuReeves It's very ironic that you see liberalism as being representative of people not being able to think for themselves when that is more of an issue dealing with the individual and their mind, not the system. Certain systems, or leaders should I say, do encourage people to be followers so the chances of revolution will be lower. But being a follower is overall an issue with the person even in that scenario.
@@mikeoxsbigg1I agree.
It's because it's not describing the liberalism that they call it nowadays but classic liberalism. These days the people calling themselves "liberals", at least in America, aren't liberal. They're just progressive authoritarians, usually voting to suppress opposition, and in favor of big government in economics.
This is a good, fundamentally sound video. Anyone complaining does not understand that this is intended to simplify and dumb down each ideology to make it easily digestible. Of course it doesn’t explain nuance and complexity of each.
That requires thousands of hours of research and more after that, to articulate it into a coherent thought. Which most people don't have the time for, or are too ignorant because of their own biases and cognitive dissonance to take the other sides theories in a good faith manner.
@@winkuus I am not opposed to oversimplification but my problem with the video is that he shows clear bias with ideologies, randomly going on a tangent and criticizing libertarianism but then he doesn't do the same for other ideologies, it's just very biased and skewed with how he describes things.
@BumwichLike is reading even a small part of Rothbard or literally anyone else that hard? Go look up any prominent libertarians. Is watching like one or two videos that hard?
I know most of these people really don’t like libertarians. But at least give us a good definition. Not a word about property rights mentioned.
Idk, at least he didn’t also say liberal on social issues conservative on economic issues. That’s almost as bad.
@@bear3616 I'm confused as to who you are telling to read rothbard? Me or the guy who made the video?
@@bear3616 that part at the end is absolutely true, libertarians are obviously for complete free market but technically can have any social beliefs they want, I'm personally a libertarian who believes in conservative social values as would be considered under classical liberalism, but I wouldn't say that makes me less of a libertarian just for having a belief on what values are better for society, as long as you don't believe the government should socially engineer such values, it's still libertarianism.
your timing is impeccable
Preston Garvey, Commonwealth Minutemen.
I do like the generalization of each ideology however I don’t like that for some of these ideologies, they have a personal bias. If you don’t know what I’m talking about watch the video again and notice how some of them get more negatives and some more positives. It’s as if the speaker is being subjective not objective.
I've noticed that through the video as well. I understand the video is meant to simply the ideologies, but give each ideology the same treatment. There are pros and negatives to each one so stick to a basic formula throughout the video.
Yep, I already made the comment, but they are clearly a green progressive. The only two stances that they actively tried to present as morally superior.
I watched your video, and your description of socialism was solid up until you claimed that 'there will be no incentive to work.' While it's true that a classless, moneyless society is the long-term goal of socialism, it's misguided to assume that people are inherently lazy or only motivated by money.
Humans are naturally creative and driven by curiosity, passion, and a desire to contribute. Do you have hobbies or interests outside of work? Those are great examples of how people engage in meaningful activities without financial incentives.
Reducing human motivation to 'money or nothing' oversimplifies what truly drives us. Socialism isn’t about removing motivation-it’s about removing exploitation. People will still innovate, create, and collaborate, but without the constant pressure of tying survival to wages. I want to see a society where humans can truly thrive, and right now, that ability to thrive is bottlenecked by modern capitalism.
A better world is possible.
Everyone is driven by a desire to contribute? 😂
ur completely, and i mean COMPLEYELY wrong lol
@@frankiebrahif you never work with other people (or just never work, if you had the opportunity) you’ll literally just end up depressed, everyone wants to contribute to something. The brain benefits from helping/working with others. It’s been hardwired into us since we first put our minds together to capture or grow food.
Watch squid game
All this video thought me is that humans don’t know to manage themselves and all our political ideologies are flawed. So everyone is wrong yet we argue who’s right?
Damn, those are some fine words. We’re all screwed aren’t we
Technically Conservatism is a collective term for a bunch of different ideologies as Conservatism is gonna be different in every country
Chapters
0:01 Liberal
1:30 Conservative
2:50 Socialist
4:47 Libertarian
6:10 Authoritarian and Totalitarian
8:16 Anarchist
9:56 Environmental and Green
11:52 Nationalist
13:41 Progressive and Radical
15:11 Global and transnational
It reached 10 more than the goal.
We need social democracy in the US!!
No
Yes@@Thejonkler0
@@bbzellner no
I feel like we're leaving out that liberalism adds more government control to every aspect of life while conservatism removes government restrictions. These aren't ideological points per se but they do happen naturally because of those ideological values. For everything to be fair, someone has to control everything in liberalism, and for everything to be traditional, people have to be left to their devices in conservativism. As you can probably guess, going too far in either direction is not great.
We need more Liberal leadership in the USA. Especially towards the LGBTQ Community, like I’m not LGBTQ but damn… I can’t help but feel bad for them. Lil bro can’t handle different cultures and differences lol couldn’t be me
Why do they need extra treatment? They’ve already been front and center for 10 years
@ no they haven’t let’s be honest. So what if they’re front center? Is that a bad thing?
@@JohnGutter-q5x This right here is some famous last words type of situation.
@JohnGutter-q5x yes they have been and they're a terrorist group they don't want equality they want superiority they're hypocritical assholes and bullies who play victim.
@@JohnGutter-q5x So what if they're not front and center? Is that a bad thing?
I'm a Socialist, and I noticed one tiny issue with the description in the video.
Yes, Socialism is a classless society, but it is also a moneyless one. It would quite literally be impossible to earn equal wages because wages aren't a thing.
To address the lack of an incentive to work, the incentive would simply be to first, survive, and second, because you'd be able to do whatever you want because you aren't bound by a lack of funds; whether it's for work or as a hobby; the sky's not the limit anymore.
I'm not trying to sell some utopian fantasy because that simply doesn't exist. No system is perfect because humans aren't perfect, some are just better than others, like how Capitalism was a step up from Feudalism, Socialism is a step up from Capitalism.
The Problem is that usually the means to try and achieve Socialism is to hand over more power to the government
And the more you give them without checks and balances or any means to hit back
They will take advantage of it
I am biased to be fair though, as I don't trust most politicians, especially modern ones
I see them as power hungry rats who look out for themselves, not as people who serve the Public
Capitalism > Socialism
@heha2684 You wanna provide an argument instead of going "DiS iS gOoD, dIs Is BaD"? I'd love to hear why you believe that.
@IMC_Grunt Do any socialist country exist?
@@heha2684no because america destabilizes them internally before they can thrive lol
The section on anarchism is surprisingly accurate. It does explain the anarchist philosophy in a nutshell.
Some were definitely forgotten but that’s 🆗
Correction: Marxism isnt original, Utopian Socialism is OG Socialism
Great video! Definitely not biased….
11:02 that logo is actually good ngl
i kept hearing about Vibrations of Manifestation by alex lane from my friends, and honestly, i thought it was just another trendy self-help book. but when they started landing jobs they thought were impossible and reconnecting with things they’re passionate about, i had to pay attention. it’s not just “be positive” stuff; it’s more about aligning with what you actually want in life. if you’re stuck or feeling off, maybe it’s the nudge you need-it’s worked for people around me.
Politically charged.
Great video ❤, can you do every mythology weapons and items
3:23 Isn't that social democracy as oppose to democratic socialism?
Yes.
Preciate your addition of the pros and cons of each. I think the current retardation in the political landscape is formed for two reasons: 1. Failing to see the negatives. 2. Just because a politician is currently saying the right thing doesn't mean they actually believe that thing.
It’s strange that science-the foundation of our understanding of reality-is not at the center of our political systems. Liberal, conservative, and communist ideologies have shown their flaws, yet we overlook the possibility of governance rooted in scientific principles. What could be a better way to structure society than through an ideology grounded in evidence, reason, and progress?
Making yourself feel good, even in expense of others
Well what metric would you be basing this on? The reason so many ideologies exist is because no one can agree on what is the most important thing. So what scientific principles would we be using if one side values one thing and another side values another thing?
Well that would be communism.
It'd lead to a scientific dictatorship,
(yes, there is such a thing) and it
would still be no good. Not to men-
tion people do disagree on even the
most basic things, so,,,
I mean, this is what political philosophers from the Enlightenment was doing when they thought of the ideas of natural rights, popular sovereignty, religious toleration, and the idea of the nation as made up of equal citizens instead of subjects of the king. Thinkers like Locke, Rousseau, Voltaire, Montesquieu, etc were all working off of/inspired by the new ideas of reason and the scientific method popping up in the 1600s and 1700s - they were like “hey what if we could apply these ideas to government too” and boom, there’s people advocating for democratic governance
I love how in describing Anarchy he just describes the game Mao.😂
While I do think it can’t hurt to make the planet more green and plant more trees and reduce pollution and such I also think that it’s gunna be a long while before the earth is gunna be very uncomfortable to live on. Also windmills just aren’t very effective.
Well, better than nothing, and besides, you always can just make a hydro dam, or use nuclear power that's actually controlled.
I think this does well at explaining the old ways these political parties used to function but I think it has changed a lot of ways now a days.
After all this days I thought your name channel was "The Elevator" ....
I'm a liberal!!! I like doing things in a Democratic way!!! I'm pro choice!!!
Unbiased explanations, telling the good, and the bad between them all!!!
The Last one (globalism or wtvr) is litterally so peak! Humanity would be so much further by now, maybe even a full on type 1 or 2 civilasation! Imagine the power of all regions merging, the sheer progress humanity would achieve is immaculate!!
But no, instead we have wars, inequalties across regions and all that crap. Yay!
Globalist ideology is a walking disaster.
Jews and Muslims aren't ever going to get along and more.
Globalism is naive as hell
@@florian6808 that's your fault for expecting peace and equality from a species that has only ever excelled at fighting one another. Btw, equality is a myth. It's not real.
@@florian6808read a history book. We're not the main character.
@@treybowers154 No Shit. Thats my point
you ever meet those people who just seem to attract the right stuff without even trying? i found out a bunch of my friends like that all read Vibrations of Manifestation by alex lane, and now i kinda get it. it’s not about wishful thinking-it’s about aligning your energy with what you really want and trusting the process. since reading it, they’re more grounded and attracting the right people and chances into their lives. if you’re feeling like things aren’t flowing right, this might be worth a look-you never know, it could help turn things around.
today i discovered i am an eco-anarchist. huh.
maybe get yourself checked at a psychiatrist to make sure there's no screws loose
Time stamps for each ideology:
0:00 Liberal
1:29 Conservative
2:50 Socialist
4:47 Libertarian
6:11 Authoritarian & Totalitarian
8:17 Anarchist
9:57 Environmental & Green
11:52 Nationalist
13:42 Progressive & Radical
15:10 Global & Transnational
I’m a Nationalist Conservative, I don’t really judge people for who they are or what they believe in tho.
7:27 literally 1984
6:01. That's a misconception. Libertarians do not believe there should be absolutely no laws and no consequences, that would be anarchy. Not the political ideology of anarchism, anarchy as in chaos, mayhem, what have you. Libertarians do believe, in my opinion, the same thing that Liberals do, that the Government must do for others what others cannot do for themselves, its just that Libertarians believe people are capable of doing a lot more than others would have them believe.
A system which lacks law, order & authority is anarchy. Libertarians want small governments, little to no government interference & as much personal autonomy as possible
As an Australian, our liberals are NO WHERE NEAR that definition of liberal
My's is progressive with a mix of environmental and liberal. And I'm curious about what everyone else is 😍
I'm a Conservative mixed in with Nationalism. I call my doctrine Nationalist Conservatism.
@mythyou33 oh that's so cool!!
@mythyou33That is already a documebted doctrine and is called national conservatism.
Libertarian. He kinda fumbled the ball on our segment. We don't necessarily believe in do anything you want entirely. And then there's the take on corporations, which under libertarian government, would die without the government subsidizing
Environmental. with some constitutionalist and “can we please have a government that works good?”
I have no idea why libertarianism was shit on and anarchy gets praise on top of being switched
I didn't know there was a political group of environmental and that i am one of them
as a moderate, I believe what's morally right cause as long as you have deep respect to everyones well being for trying to live happy then we can all live in a positive environment. like for example youre black and believe in equal right, but like guns cause most 2nd amendment conservatives do, as long as you take responsibility and share your interest to a person even if they're non english speaking person, or a trump supporter respectfully then thats all that matters in a society.
Well it's hard to like eachother when one side wants to abolish my rights as a human being because I'm transgender or this or that and the other side wants to keep moving foward
I think some of these are pretty spot on but I think a lot of others have way changed from the past.
These all have pros and cons. I technically fall under multiple of these ideologies.
aw dang it, I wanted to trick the system into giving me double the xp
Now guys let's all get along here no one needs to die unless ... joking like seriously let plz stop killing eachother over money, power and influence and maybe try fixing our problems
I think I am my own ideology I agree with most of the parts of most of the ideologies in this video
Libertarianism isn't "no rules" and you got close with "live and let live as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else". It's about the people having rights and that the government should just focus on keeping everything flowing correctly without infringing on the people's rights or safety. So no, there wouldn't be glitter in the water or air subscriptions because those are necessary to life. It would more so be if someone got tap water then in their own home added glitter then they would be within there right to do so. So things like the police, the FDA, and CPS would still exist to maintain the safety and public order of the government citizens. A construction company has to abide by building regulations when building home for others and a private citizen building for others has to do the same but for themselves it's fine. That issue would arise if being sold then it would have to pass a safety inspection before sale.
The only issue I have with this is how all the rightful issues stateted are seen from a lense of the people still having the same egoistic and tired mindset they currently have in a capitalistic function
Yeah at the beginning it would be deficult but at least 1 or 2 generations in and ppl would have very different life hood mindsets
I identify as politically non-binary.
Real
🤡
effective video
to add onto that guy down there👇 they also would let you be a pirate or an animal or a house plant or an egg salad
Im an anarchist 🥰🖤♥️
My Ideology is Radical Centrist
Yeah, liberism, what the US used to be
Here before the "jake💪⚽💕👟💯🔥🔥 sigma Trump - 13" replies angrily
"liberism" - a liberal trying to type.
the irony.
I honest don't have alignment with any of these political ideologies, because it very difficult to disclose facts from speculation about complex problems. Also it creates tribalism which isn't addressing the issues nor do anything because if you create a law that beneficial to your group but it will hurting the general public and that is the issue. Because at the end of day political ideologies won't matter when life through challenges at your political ideologies beliefs with reality.
M8ssed it on the socialism bit. But i feel this is satire
no one is ever politicaly correct as it does not exist
Am I crazy or am I partly all of these I don’t wanna go to far with it but not to little either-
It’s called being a moderate. A position people seem to have forgotten that you can take.
Im gonna clarify this in socialism everybody doesn't earn the same
Thank you for trying to explain liberalism to conservative americans. Key word here is trying. 😅
He explained classical liberalism. Not modern American liberalism.
No, classical liberalism is the one rooted in individualism and the enlightenment
Idk I'm just a peasant
@@WeaponizedGoochsweat Modern liberalism was basically captured with Progressivism.
not gonna lie, i thought manifestation was overhyped until a friend gave me Vibrations of Manifestation by alex lane. i wasn’t expecting much, but everyone i know who read it started making these real changes-they’re more focused, more aware of their energy, and opportunities they’ve been chasing are finally coming through. it’s not a magic answer, but it opens your eyes to what you’re putting out there. if you’re feeling stuck, it might help shift things for you too.
You've managed to say "to each according to their ability" and still somehow say we'd all be paid the same under socialism. The phrase itself tells you that your ability also dictates how much you earn. Also, socialism is collective, not state ownership. The people own the means of production.
Also, Anarchism is the abolition of the state. Not the government.
The video is great overall, though.
You forgot about National Bolshevism
6:05 You just contradicted yourself, if libertarianism focuses on having unrestricted freedom until it reaches freedoms of others then throwing toxic waste into water is still against libertarian morals when there will be someone's property rights [ property rights also includes your body and it's health according to the idea btw ] being effected by that decision. To the extent it could be viewed as an act of aggression.
He did not contradict himself, in fact, that's how libertarian ethics work. They are just as contradictary as the capitalist system they apologize for.
@@MiserableMuon You're just angry, I've just explained these ethics and yet you cant comprehend them. You're angry and you're projecting.
@@thirdbrother4018 libertarians claim that they support individual liberty. But their economic position doesn't believe in individual liberty. Only for the proprietors who own private property, get to have liberty, while others have to slave away and be exploited by the proprietary class. This is also referred to as rugged individualism, where individualists only care about the privilege of a few over the collectivity.
@ property rights extends to your life. You choose what you're doing, you live how you want to live and the only thing that stops you from doing something are freedoms of others.
Exploitation is subjective if you know how people treated work 10,20 or 50 years ago and how they treat it now.
The libertarian approach to capitalism recognizes people's ability to generate property and wealth, they have a say on how to manage it and if their methods arent preferable in a competitive spectre then they're going out.
What you're truly typing now is about modern oligarchy that we have today thanks to the big government getting in bed with few monopolies that control the market. You marxists have problem in understanding these differences, the state is part of the problem not the solution to the monopolization of markets and "rugged individualism".
There's no contradiction. Just look a yourselves, you are joke lmao
Y’all forgot nazism
It's a part of nationalism
That’s pretty much just facsism
Common Liberalism W
Welp your ideological stance definitely bled through in this video.
Green Progressivism.
Where's Nazism
In hell
Isn't that a party?
@Rionasugaz It's an ideology mixing Socialist Movement with Nationalism. And aye, there's still parties that are N.S
In the trash
@@Gods_choosen_warrior where it belongs.
The evaluator should make a video about Aromantic Asexaul Aro Ace
Yes Yep
Ah yes.. handy as a frostpunk 2 player. Adaptation soinds like conservatism with the example with the ai but when saying tradition..well it fits tradition.. but its not nessecarily moral so it fits adaptation the opposite of progression.. dont like it xD
Anarchism and liberalism sounds like lawless chaos inevitable to end in crime and fail. Its less of a "bad rep" its more of a concerning flaw.
I think you got socialism and communism confused
Socialism and Communism are very similar
The two are very similar. The only real major difference is that with communism, private property is abolished. Beyond that, they're practically the same. At least by the standards of socialism that Marx laid out.
They are generally similar, but there is far more variety in forms of socialism (although classical Marxist socialism tends to evolve into communism)
This felt remarkably one sided, and the video was really trying to support anarchism HARD and made a lot of assumptions about human nature and the rise of conflict in society for what was arguably the most supported ideology in the video.
Ah yes, the extremely oversimplified American political narrative that leaves out the idea of a state apparatus and the way people actually govern
good video but i think you lack understanding of socialism, the whole ‘work incentive’ problem only applies using capitalist logic. you work to contribute, not to make money.
into the other part of the talking about the liberals pretty much all the rights we have aside from 18-year-olds voting from the USA founding fathers
I don’t think you understood what socialism is.
Just read its wiki page
First under 20 seconds
👇
Somthing tell me this huy is team liberalism
I think you confused libertarianism and anarchism.
He literally didn’t but ok…💀
The video tried to totally sell green environmentalism like it was the greatest thing since sliced bread while totally ignoring the fact that most green policies are totally unsustainable and are an undemocratic way of forcing socialist ideals. An example would be passing a law that all new cars sold have to be electric by a certain year, ignoring the fact that the batteries are made from lithium mined by child slave labor and that the electrical grid is already overstretched beyond capacity, and that mandating only a certain type of car goes against all principles of a free market economy
Nobody cares what type of car you're driving if the planet is habitable.
"are totally unsustainable and are an undemocratic way of forcing socialist ideals."
Oh okay, you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about and just call anything you don't like "socialist". Good that we got that out of the way.
IdeoBalls
I believe in joe hendrey
👏👏
You're supposed to only explain the idelogy, not your stance on it.
It’s THEIR video so I guess that’s what you clicked on the video for
he's not really giving his stance he's just pointing out one or two problems after explaining it. pretty much all of which were accurate too
I do believe in science and socialism, because it works, especially in the Nordic countries, where i live.
Scandanavian countries are not socialist.
@LobotomizeCommies10 we actually are. Google it.
It works in smaller countries. It wouldn't work in large countries like USA. Look at Venezuela. They tried, but it didn't work
Considering they have free markets and rank higher than even America, you aren't socialists.
Ehh, socialism might seem great on the surface, but it's not that great
the socialism segment is not fully correct, in socialism wages are as follows: "from each according to his ability, to each according to his work" and core principle is "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need". the only inequality in socialism is the wages, you get paid based on your work value. if you're a brain surgeon, you get paid more than you'd get paid as an artist, but everyone gets healthcare and an education. your needs are taken care of aside from your personal wage.
Ok, but then, due to taxation, how much do you actually make? And if we bring this to its logical conclusion, then it will turn into Soviet Russia.
If you get taxed for everything that the government provides; food, Healthcare, transportation, housing, manufacturing etc... you'd quickly reach a point where your alloted income is so low that you can't purchase the bag of bread you want or since the government provides food, they would remove capital from the picture entirely and rely on a moneyless system like food stamps. I dont think I need to explain how that can be detrimental.
Not to mention, since the government chooses what to invest manpower in, you (hypothetically you're a graphic designer) will get forced into whatever field they want you to be in with little to no say in wether you want to perform said job, Carl Marx did say "from each according to their needs, to each according to their faculties." And that means that if your of able body you would be forced into hard labour. No questions.
If you have a bit of land, you wouldn't be able to do anything you wanted to do with it, since the state controls land allotment and industry and blah blah blah, they would seize your assets if you made a garden or started a business; I mean it makes sense since the state has final authority on industry right?
Even in democratic socialism it's the same thing, they would still seize your assets if you had more than someone else, its about equity not equality.
I'm not against social policies, I think that universal Healthcare is possible and food resources for the needy are great. But I also think that those are benefits that a strong liberal society can provide if we properly manage our country's spending. I.e. not spend money on useless safe injection sites that are poorly managed and poorly implemented.
4:11 Venezuela
sucks
@FlatMonkeyman yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes. Oh did I mention yes.
Venezuela isn't socialist btw
It most certainly is a socialist country. The current rulling political party is socialist. In the 2000s, the government started nationalising industries, equally distributing wealth, and offering wellfare programs. Now, it's an authoritarian hellscape because of the socialism. The main issues with socialism are that the government has to gain control over the economy and the fact that the money has to come from somewhere. You can't just equally distribute wealth and offer free stuff, that just causes people to stop working, then your economy collapses.
Although socialism and communism start out a bit differently, they're very similar. And they end up at the same place, authoritarianism. Venezuela also got poorer when they started introducing socialist policies.
This is why a balance of all is needed. Too far on one side is going to be bad.
0:00
Never heard it pronounced phonetically like that
Ideology= Stupidity preventing you from your achievement
You're confusing ideology with dogma. Everyone has their personal ideology.
@asterlyons8564 yeah, whatever
@@SapphireDragon-fd2ws okay. Stand for nothing, i guess.
@@asterlyons8564 yeah boy! Ideological Nihilism! When you have no ideas or beliefs to support and defend. The ultimate, true form of nihilism.
As today, there is no country left that is totalitarian, only authoritarian !!
What about Stalinite Marxism-Leninism?
@@SPAnComCatthat's an ideology
What about north korea
❤️
Any conservatives here?
The liberal vs the conservative explanation seemed very biased
2:40 resistant to change? Think of abortion and weed access if it's that.
@@MikeJ122oexactly
To conserve is to oppose change he stated what it is and given the actions of many conservatives he did so accurately
what was the bias? both were accurate
@zortez6468 he thinks it's biased because he told the truth about conservatives
My guess is the guy thinking its biased is Conservative