Thank you to everyone who supports these projects on Patreon. I wouldn't be able to devote so much time and so many resources to one video otherwise. I'm trying to make the best work I can, and the donations really do make it possible. If you'd like to chip in and support me, check out www.patreon.com/rchapman. Video notes below. Many are questioning the 'rule of law in the USA' section of this video after the July 1st 2024 SCOTUS ruling, which said that presidents are presumed to be immune from prosecution for official acts as outlined in the constitution. Frankly I don't disagree. It does seem to throw the concept of rule of law in the USA into question. We're in an unprecedented moment in American history, and the best I can say here is that we'll have to see how it plays out in practice. It also occurred to me that I should clarify what I meant at the end, saying 'the basic story of China is the story of a country that's kept to itself.' I was feeling pressure to wrap up the video and was probably too brief there. 1) I was referring to the last, say, 2000 years of Chinese history, roughly since China unified under the Qin dynasty. 2) That's a relativistic argument, saying that China has been remarkably nonaggressive considering its size and power throughout history. China has, throughout most of those 2000 years, mostly kept to itself. It has been aggressive on occasion, particularly to countries bordering it, but those instances are rare when comparing China to other great powers. Also, like I said in the video, that might be changing. China might be becoming more aggressive in the 21st century. That's yet to be born out in a hot war, but many argue that we're seeing signs of it. Hopefully that added some clarity and nuance. I saw many comments taking issue with me saying the CCP is above the law. Most seem to be coming to the conclusion that the law is above the CCP by pointing at cases where members of the CCP are tried by the court system (like when members are tried for corruption). If that's your view, it seems that you're not understanding the concept of rule of law. I made a follow-up video elaborating on that: ua-cam.com/video/RK5X-tIA_AI/v-deo.html Lastly, if you're wondering why I didn't cover Legalism in this video, I saw that as being one 'ism' too far for an introductory video. The basic dynamic between Legalists and Confucians was that Legalists tried to push China towards a country governed by law (though this never translated into rule of law, where even the highest political authorities are constrained by law), and the Confucians tried to push China in a direction where elders and leaders ruled via their discretion, not law. Influence from Legalists meant that China had a fairly strong legal tradition from fairly early on, but never rule of law, which is still true to this day. In hindsight, I probably should have cut about a minute of 'linear vs. lateral' and added a little section on Legalism. - Ryan
The purpose of war is to steal resources or manipulate another group of people into achieving your goals. It is costly and destructive, typically with both sides losing resources and resentment built between the two peoples. China uses different means to manipulate other groups of people into achieving its goals. In general those manipulations take longer but are far less risky if any one part of them fails. For example, the belt and road initiative is being used to do several things, increase trade with China, place countries into debt with China forcing their partnership regardless of political shifts, and breakout of containment by American military forces which are placed strategically around China(and match them in case of conflict). The belt and road has suffered multiple rejections and failures, yet is still largely successful. ----- I just want to say I also appreciate that this pinned response is from 7 days ago even if the video was posted months ago.
Chinese aggression is different than more traditional aggression. most dynasties would threaten another country and they would pay tribute to China. a couple of dynasties even considered themselves as rulers of the world, in which in their eyes if something was on their official maps then they owned it, only allowing others to govern the regions in their stead should they remain prosperous. if the tribute was smaller than they would like they would send their armies and punish the nation by overthrowing it and letting someone else rule it. this didn't happen too much as the nations understood what would happen if they didn't offer enough tribute, and if they forgot they would be reminded by an emissary from China. in other words China has a history of not respecting other's autonomy, while they tended to not conquer (relative to the west of course).
@@yamhweeyeo3089 The host’s spelling of China in Pinyin is certainly correct, i.e. Zhong Guo. But his pronunciation of it is just as certainly wrong. As his elaboration above alluded to, the correct pronunciation more closely approximates ‘jong’ rather than ‘chung’ where the j/ch should be an UNaccentuated sound. I’m assuming yours is not a case of misreading (of what he wrote) in which case I do encourage you to familiarise Pinyin pronunciation as it was designed precisely to enable non Mandarin native speakers to learn the modern standard pronunciation of China’s national language. Before China created the Pinyin system of pronunciation, westerners learnt Mandarin using the Wade-Giles system of pronunciation. In that system, China’s name in Mandarin would be correctly written as “chung guo” whereas Chapman’s pronunciation in that same system would effectively become “ch’ung guo” (i.e. Chapman’s pronunciation accentuated the consonant of the first word, which is incorrect). Hope this explanation using Wade-Giles system more clearly points out where Chapman’s pronunciation is in error.
Don't be embarrassed to promote yourself! You're awesome (researched, well spoken, without being overly emotional) The world needs more people like you!
@loudnsounds You have comprehension issues. He never characterized CCP as conservative. He mentioned that CCP has both the conservative and progressive. But for the CCP socialism is conservative whereas anything that shifts from that is progressive which is the direct opposite of American thinking.
@@kattttt9585 this is why I kinda love the video, because the people who are on both "sides" will think the video's opinion is on the other side. Brilliant work
Really great content. We have an old saying here in China "当局者迷，旁观者清" can be loosely translated to "the chess player cannot see the whole view, while the bystanders are capable of having a better take". Sometimes we need other perspectives from people from different cultures and political atmospheres, it helps us grow!
@@alexdeng2418 Probably because he is using a genericl term for chess/qi in Chinese. When you say Chess in English, it is by default Western Chess. In Chinese, Qi has no such default and remains a generic term. Chinese chess is known as XiangQi or "elephant chess". Western Chess is called GuoJiXiangQi or "international elephant chess". What is called Go in Japan and West is known in China as WeiQi or "surrounding chess"
British/Australian here who spent nearly 30 years living in Asia, nearly 20 of those in China. Love your channel; always learning something new. Unfortunately, due to ill health, I'm retired and living on a disability pension, otherwise I would happily support you on patreon. Keep up the great work and if I'm ever in a position to donate to a channel, yours will be the first 👍
I don’t usually comment on videos like this but this is such a well made video. I couldn’t have explained this topic any better myself as someone who immigrated to the US from China when I was 14.
As someone who teaches Chinese language, I find the lateral thinking part is reflected in the language itself. Chinese languages (regardless of regional varieties) rely heavily on context. In European languages, a verb as simple as it is, can carry a lot of information. For example, "to go" is the infinitive form, it only bears the semantic meaning. No other information can be extracted from it. But when you conjugate it, like "goes" you instantly know when this action happens (present), how many people are doing the action (only one and it has to be the third person). English is one of the least "flavourful" ones, comparing to Spanish, French, Greek, Portuguese, Russian, German etc. If you add Latin to that mix it is even crazier. But in Chinese languages, a verb is a verb. No tense, no number, no subject-verb agreement. If you ask how do you know when the action happens? You will get this answer "depends on the context." "How do you know whether it's a he or a she?" "Well, from the context, duh?" "How do you know that the person means 'to cause' and not 'faeces'?" "Again, from the context! Why would faeces suddenly appear in a sentence about good news and excited?" Kidding aside, it is very true that there isn't any inherent dualism or dichotomy in Chinese culture. Things are never either back or white. This extends to the our inventions. Why invent so many different knives when you can have one that does everything? Why invent so many pots and pans when a wok can do all those things just fine? Why have a dessert fork, dining fork, salad fork, pitchfork when you can have a pair of chopsticks? Because in the end, if you only allowed to choose a wok or a pan, wok can always accomplish more. When asked is a wok a pan or a pot? The answer is always "it depends."
I once bought a book which explains chinese writing symbols and was amused and fascinated. Like one tree is wood, three trees is forest. The funniest of all is this character which consists of a house and three women. One house one women is harmony. One house three women is chaos. And Chinese usually think in terms of surroundings. Good and bad is not a straight line.
The dualism of the Western world, which simply divides the world into democratic and undemocratic, may be largely influenced by Christianity, because in the worldview described by monotheism, the world is a dualism between God and Satan. Due to the influence of monotheism, Western countries regard the democratic system as a For a gospel, they think they have an obligation to spread the gospel of democracy. In their eyes, China is so strange. Basically, it is equivalent to a heretic. In their eyes, even if China is successful now, it is not worth mentioning that a heretic is a heretic. Unless China adopts the same system as them
Such a well-made video. Its rare to see a Westerner who actually tries to understand the Chinese and their way of thinking, and not just blindly criticize and regard them as a threat. The world would be a much better place if people are more educated and more understanding to different cultures and values.
Thanks for putting in the time to research about China. Very informative, I have a fresh, broader perspective on my own culture. I’m making my own videos about China from the perspective of someone who came from Hong Kong. And wish to share it with you in the hope of starting a meaningful dialogue. (I will send you the link, it’s going to be from a different Google account) P.S. I watch all your other videos, no one that’s they are all very well researched
“The world would be a much better place if people are more educated and more understanding to different cultures and values.” The number of laws a nation has is inversely proportional to the understanding that nation has for “different cultures and values.”
The world will be a better place, inevitably. The forces of oppression and ignorance in the West are only as powerful as their veil of ignorance is free of being pierced. Every little bit helps, and the Internet has proven to make the obliteration of those prejudice-fueled barriers an inevitably; as much as it's made it possible for hatred and ignorance to cultivate and spread in isolated echo chambers, it has, more importantly, enabled the gradual and accelerating evaporation of most of the global echo chamber(s), albeit at a pace that's generational in nature. Nonetheless, barring a successful resurgence and rise to power of fascism in the Western core, again, that would be capable of dismantling global internet infrastructure, it'll only take as long as it takes for the unhelpably ignorant to die of old age and their progeny grow up in a world with acceleratingly abundant wisdom their forebears were inoculated and propagandized against. Ironically made inevitable by the sheer capitalistic profitability of the Internet, functionally guaranteeing conservative-capitalist impotence.
lol The world would be a much better place if people are more educated and more understanding to different cultures and values. tell that to the fookin chinese. but we should stop talkin with those mainland midgets and cut them off entirely from new technologies.
To understand Chinese politics you need to understand "Socialism with Chinese characteristics" So what are the CHINESE characteristics to socialism? To put it simply, it's a combination of Confucianism and Legalism (surprised the video didn't even mention Legalism, which is just as important to Chinese politics as Confucianism) Confucianism relies on people knowing their place to attain social harmony, but of course that is not always the case, So Legalism uses the Law to MAINTAIN social harmony, so the aim is the same as Confucianism, but the method is different. Legalism is realist thinking, Confucianism is Idealist thinking Mao's social campaigns often uses Legalism to attack Confucianism. Fun fact, Mao is a great admirer of Qin Shihuang, the first Emperor of China that instituted Legalism to China in 221 BC Although the description about Deng's idea of "crossing the river by feeling the stones" is well explained, but it does NOT explain the entire implications of it. Due to the ambiguity of Deng Xiaoping on Laws rules and pretty much everything, has led to massive problems of corruption and nepotism. Where unwritten rules or unspoken laws might be prioritized over actual laws. Xi Jinping, on the other hand hates these unwritten and unspoken rule and laws, If he wants to extend his terms, he does not do what Deng did, which is to pull the strings behind the screen and PRETEND not to be in power, Xi could easily done that without touching anything, HOWEVER, that would continue the cycle of nepotism and corruption. Some say that Xi is power hungry for doing it, but I beg to differ, Xi is not Mao and never will even if he tries, Mao can turn on the Party, but Xi is no where near as powerful, he is a product of the Party, So what he does MUST have the general blessing of the Party, and the way I see it is that his term extensions were agreed upon by the Party to fix the problems the Party and the country might have. To extensively reform China, and the Largest political party in the world is no easy task, and 10 years is nowhere near enough. So, my prediction is, the before Xi Jinping retires, he will institute a more rule based power transition, due to his disdain about unwritten rules and retired Party elders engaging in nepotism.
At long last, a video about the subject without preconceived notions of what is correct and what is wrong, but purely as an exploration of what is. Well done!
The "what is" is missing out on a lot though, and can be far more subjective than you think. For one, "lateral thinking" is presented to be flexible, but using his example, the different between Deng's and Xi's "socialism with Chinese characteristics" can also be explained away by the lack of real goals or ideology other than to keep the CCP in power. Another example, that the Chinese were never the aggressors in history, is flat out wrong. Every neighbour has been invaded by Han Chinese in the past, see Tibet, Vietnam, Korea. Look up the Sui, Tang, Ming, Qing dynasties.
Totalitarian governments is wrong. Censoring people for criticism is wrong. Stealing land from neighboring countries is wrong. Threatening to invade and take a country that you’ve never owned is wrong.
As a southeast Asian Chinese who's studied in the West, your explanation and arguments are succinct and clear. You've just earned my sub. Looking forward to more!
Brilliant. Finally some quality intellectual content. Doesn’t dumb anything down to an absurd level and makes information accessible with clear and precise definitions and examples. If you are the one who wrote the script then truly you are someone who is on such a level that many scholars and politicians would respect. Making such a complex topic into a 20 minute video essay with high level commentary. Amazing. Not even going to mention the charisma of a man that does not try to speak bs or to play on emotion. These days it’s rare to see in any media.
This is probably my favorite social/political commentary channel because Ryan is so even-keeled, careful, and yet thorough to a good extent given his video durations.
I generally learn more about a topic in a 20-minute video from Ryan Chapman than I've known in my prior 71 years. This is especially true for topics like China, where I didn't know much to begin with, but also for topics like liberalism, where I thought I knew a lot.
Brilliant content. It's so rare to find a Westerner acknowledging the fundamental but equally valuable differences between US and Chinese political thinking. Bravo!
@@wnklee6878 America those know what they're doing as far as monopolizing violence and military superiority. Except, China seems to knows America better than we do while we know nothing of China.
@ReivWW not what he's talking about. He's talking about the president. The Supreme Court ruled that anything he does legal or not as president is non-prosecutuable. As long as he says it's an official duty of the office, he cannot be prosecuted. Assassinate a sitting supreme court justice? He can order seal team 6 to do just that. It's insane.
I really like your stripped down analysis of essential concepts. I've been struggling to make the Chinese case to Americans, and you handed me all tools and analogies. Excellent work. Solid writing.
Terrific! I’ve been in China many times, spending about a year there in the aggregate, and know many Chinese people from many walks of life, many quite educated. For someone who’s not a China expert, acknowledging the generalizations, you nailed it. Love your channel. I think your research and presentations are exceptional.
This is a good video. I’ve been studying China and East Asian politics for 40 years and this has been the best understanding of the Chinese approach to governance I’ve seen on YT.
Evil would be a much better word to use, other than philosophy. The CCP makes millions of dollars removing organs from Falun Gong practitioners while they are alive and selling the parts to rich westerners. To get the practitioners to sign donation forms the CCP uses brutal torture techniques. I know an elderly Chinese lady who had an electric cattle prod put into her vagina. Wall Street and the American news media are aware of a lot of these atrocities but spell human right$ like that.
This was very well researched and presented. I always wondered about China's political philosophy but most sources are very Anti Chinese so I am happy to find someone who can explain it in a more Neutral way.
China collapsing demographically and economically and politically in one decade. Is anyone seeing it coming? I think the CCP does. A cornered cat can make strange leaps...
Try reading some of Ray Dalio's books - he has had tons of experience with top Chinese leaders. And those experiences get mentioned as you read the books. Mostly though, it boils down to "Long term oriented, committed to country's future over over other goals. Sensible with respect to the actual realities they are facing." Being aligned on "what benefits the country" is not a bad position for government. Even if that view is obviously limited by the comprehension of the leaders.
Really impressed with this foray into understanding the differences. I observe these gaps in understanding all the time, unfortunately even amongst most of my foreign policy peers who only frame society and history in a linear/vertical way.
meh... I didnt like his hand-wavey attack on dengism. He basically just ignored all existing chinese leftist theory to say "yeah theyre just capitalist lol"
@@RockPile_ I don't understand your comment. Deng expresses the ultimate in Chinese pragmatism which is the point of Chandler's presentation. "I don't care what colour the cat is as long as it catches mice". Maoism failed. In China human nature which drives capitalism is no longer suppressed but given wide range in the interest of prosperity and social harmony as long as everyone respects the authority and guidance of the CPP. Allowing people to get rich by their own efforts and to enjoy the rewards so generated is the essence of enlightened and effective governance.
Joshua, I understand exactly what you mean, and have heard many Westerners do such a poor job of introducing China and Chinese "thinking" I was prepared for one more on that long list of failures. I thought he did the best "beginner" overview for the lay person, with respect for all, I may have ever listened to. Best wishes for your health and prosperity. Pat
@@ericyendall3292 I wouldn't say Maoism failed, just it's not immediately applicable. It is hard to argue against Maoism's effectiveness in unifying a broken country with very few resources. It's not very good at growth though.
Absolutely the one part of the video I did not agree with. Ideally that is what American principles are, yet the law is incredibly flexible for those with power/resources to bend it.
@@Boingus- Does it cause outrage though? Everytime a poor person goes to jail for criminal homelessness, no one says anything. When only one guy goes to jail for crashing the 2008 housing market, we bail out the banks and continue on as if nothing happened.
I am Chinese. I have to say your explanation of China, in general terms, is pretty good. Yep, the US vs China is kind of binary thinking vs spectrum thinking. You did a good job to help different cultures to understand each other better so we all can get along. Thank you.
it's not pretty good, it's deep, refreshing and insightful. I have to say we need more people like him on the planet, if people like Ryan can be the US president, the Chinese Chairman and other political leaders at the same time, world peace and prosperity will be achieved. I have to say this is the first time I feel like I fell in love with a person because of his wisdom and horizon.
@@starkiller578 Firstly, there are large population of Chinese people and offspring that live oversea. People in China can access things like Google and UA-cam with VPN, which is theoretically not allowed, but practically never banned and not very difficult to get.
@@starkiller578 thanks for your concern, actually there are a lot of Chinese citizens using VPN to watch UA-cam like me, although it is quite illegally, the police have no interest in arresting people for that kind of reasons (flexible laws again) As long as you don't spread political sensitive message and porn or something illegal inside the GFW
In America we have flexible laws too. That’s the one thing I didn’t get about this video. What is Unitary Executive Theory (which brings a great deal of power to the executive when we know America’s founders were worried about the problems inherent in monarchy) if not a flexible interpretation of the constitution because of a new political context? To give a better example, we also outlaw pirating in America (downloading shows and movies and music outside of proper channels) but it’s not something the police look into. And the idea that presidents can be held accountable just because they’re in theory a private citizen doesn’t hold out in practice. Basically, I think the video maker compared how China appears to be in practice to how America is supposed to be in theory, especially when it comes to the law subject. The discussion on lateral thinking and most other points were great, though I can’t debunk half of them bc I’m not a China expert or Chinese.
I am a Chinese who both absorb from not only east but west, I read the ancient classics of both in China and West. Your observation is so detailed and you unveil the nuances between China and USA, thank you for making this video.
Essentially China just keeps things ambiguous so they do not need to be fully committed as there will always be another interpretation if things go wrong.
Heyo, I'm curious, what do you think the english 'classics' are? What are some Chinese classics that you believe every Chinese citizen has read? I hope you are feeling good today. Have a great day :)
@@repacharge431There are classics I think you might be interested that we call as the 'Four Classic Chinese Novels', which are 'Journey to the West', 'Dream of the Red Chamber'(this one a bit boring in my opinion), 'Romance of Three Kingdoms', and 'Outlaw of Marsh'. If you are interested in the influence of development of contemporary China, you can read works done by Lu Xun (鲁迅) after some knowledge of modern history of China. Other than those that I mention, there are a whole lot more works like ancient Chinese poems and etc that we learnt when we were in school. Btw, some of the modern works that younger generations like is some of the sci-fi work by Liu cixin like 'The Three Body Problem' Trilogy. I'm glad that you have interest in Chinese classics and is fully welcome to answer them furthermore if you like
I never heard of this term but as a mainland Chinese I have to say the "lateral thinking" thing is spot on. I grew up with my dad always saying things like "the only thing certain is uncertainty". Chinese people deal so much with flexibility and human relations, thats probably why we have a hard time accepting religion, democracy or so called "universal values". I guess the linear way of thinking is great for science or specific study, lateral thinking is good for handling complex human relations, morality etc which are difficult to be solved by law.
@@kekbin1697 Not sure about singapore for Taiwan yes, they had their first election in 1996. I'm generally pro-democracy, I'm just saying between "linear thinking" and "lateral thinking" there should be more mutual understanding of each other, not like one system is completely superior or the other is pure evil that kind of statement.
Plenty of us linear westerners rejected religion as well. I still hold out hope for democracy but its also starting to seem illusory as well, and having the same ultimate purpose of placating and controlling the masses, an understandable goal for rulers, but not governors in a representative system…
@@schyllic imo there's no absolute truth to any physical and conceptual entities in this universe, and pretty much all man-made concepts are subject to manipulations. To be specific, I believe this current version of "democracy" proclaimed by the west is a perfect tool to reposition the people in positions of power in the "backstage", as opposed to the "front stage" like kings, queens, and others in the old days. If you think about it, this new stage is by far better at resolving the conflict of interest between the powerful and the weak, for the powerful of course. Plus if you read the entire history of Bourgeois revolution(ik ik people from the bourgeois sphere doesn't agree with this concept, for the very reason you stated in your comment actually) this becomes very clear.
The word democracy basically means an election system, it is not necessary to do any good for a community/country, somehow this word got translated into Chinese as 民主, meaning people is the master, government's function is to serving the people, however look at the current election system in the west, did it work in such a way? Therefore nowadays when people bring up this word Democracy, many Chinese find it revolting. 😂
2:55 this doesn't translate into much more than symbolic niceties 😅 China's name for most western countries are phonetic transliterations, using different preexisting characters that sound like each countries' name: Faguo ("lawful country", 法国) is short for Falanxi (France, 法兰西), Yingguo ("outstanding country", 英国) is short for Yinggelan (England, 英格兰), and here Meiguo ("beautiful country", 美国) is just short for Meilijian (America, 美利坚). They're not perfect transliterations, but they sorta sound like the original and they get the job done 😅. I suppose unsurprisingly nice characters specifically were chosen to denote these names. I imagine it'd cause quite a stir if some country's name were translated into shit-land. But good observation anyway, and great video!
As a kid I always thought it was really funny that Japan's name for US is 米国 “rice” instead of 美国 "beautiful". I've actually never heard anyone say 亚美利加/坚 IRL
the translation of the countries' names is well considered, including "信、达、雅“，which means accuracy \fluency\elegant, 'America' could be translated into "霉国” if we only consider the phonetic aspect, and that means "the mildewed country“.
Interesting take. Though I am not usually a fan of general statements of cultural characteristics like "Americans are vertical thinkers" or "Chinese are lateral thinkers," I think in this case there's a certain truth to this observation, overly simplistic as it may be. I would argue that this is less an artifact of some essential cultural difference but rather the immediate consequence of two very different political systems. In two-party electoral systems like the United States, political actors must frame their policies and platform IN OPPOSITION to those of other political actors. This invites a sort of cycle where confrontational politics make their way into confrontational media, and so on. Hence, American political strategy is simple and straightforward precisely because of the need to make it easily digestible and discernable. On the other hand, one-party rule in China has meant that the CPC is the only legitimate authority in China. To get anything done, one must go through the party. This is not to say that political discussions do not occur in China, but rather that they take place in the context of party rule. Without the need to pander to voters, policymakers are free to design more elaborate, flexible, and contextual strategies and carry them out over much longer periods. Another thing that should be emphasized is the internal governance mechanisms of the party. This is a massive topic deserving a video of its own but something like party discipline and unity (a huge priority of the current administration) which means that party members are not so much above the law but rather subject to a different set of (often stricter) rules of behavior.
Exactly !!! Too often the corruption crackdown by Xi Jing Ping has been painted as political witchhunt by western media. Hopefully someone here can work with Ryan to obtain enough material to debunk this notion.
I don't know how many people can get your points - you seemed to have majored in political science? Or extremely well-read, researched, on government and politics. Thanks for sharing the extremely insightful thoughts -
"but rather subject to a different set of (often stricter) rules of behavior" very true. Party members get punished twice, one by the law, one by the Party rule.
I agree that western democracies are more open while policy disagreements in China are handled in private. Reminds me of parents arguing in front of children. There are times that sensitive discussions should be handled in private to avoid a new media circus which can be counter productive.
I heard from someone that used to live in China, that if you speak out against the government, they black bag you and you disappear. Dude said he saw it first hand in a subway.
What an excellent video....especially the linear and lateral thinking explanation. The Chess vs Go comparison. The extractions from "The art of War" You truly have insight.
I definitely would love to see more content from you. This, for me, is one of the better channels to expand or even explain certain topics in a way that is more concise than my own observations.
I really like the way you condense incredibly broad topics into a clear presentation of the main points. Comparing and contrasting American and Chinese thought could easily take decades to understand thoroughly, but your explanation gives a comprehensible view in under a half hour. It is a great starting point to be able to allow discussion and exploration of points of view between people who may think they disagree. Thank you for this potential foundation for a rebuild of decent and civil society.
6:58 “The law is above all citizens in America… Even if the President is caught breaking the law, the President can be held accountable for it.” This didn’t age well… 💀
This seems to be a pretty fair unbiased presentation, which is difficult to come across. It's nice to know that there are people in the US curious about China and actually going through great length doing all that research. The points are solid. I am literally amazed by the knowledge you had to acquire to back all this up. I'd very much like to see your chanel grow.
Yeah basically. We do that a lot here in China and we tend to also add in great meanings in those translated names. For example for England we use "英国/Ying Guo". "英" means good-looking/handsome and also has the similar sounding as "En" in "England".
@@royzed2039 come on 英 also means wisdom. England means a country of wisdom. Germany， 德， means virtue，morality. France 法 means law，standard, method. All are good words.
Wrong. The term was coined by early Chinese immigrants to the USA (19th Century) and simply describes the natural beauty of the landscape they found. You are over-thinking it.
@@unreliablenarrator6649 Don't spread wrong information. It started as something like "亚梅利加兼合国" when Chinese people met American people for the first time then it got simpler like "美利坚合众国" then "美国". Nothing to do with your false statement.
Well done and insightful! Regarding the contrast of the people's views on authority in China and United States, I remember a Chinese philosopher (Dongyue Wang) said, that's due to the historical formation of societies. Chinese society is a very old one, which regarded authority as necessary to unite and organise people from different tribes and backgrounds to work together for public good, such as to combat natural disasters in ancient times (i.e. the flood of Huanghe river), so the Chinese society has been organised by the 'rule of human' (secular origin); whereas the people in United States see authority as repressive and self-interested, as the European settlers brought their trauma from their home countries where they were deprived and persecuted, so they treat authority with distrust, and prefer to be ruled by something 'transcending' human (judged by god)--'rule of law' (of religious origin). Which also explains the differences in modern societies.
In the early days of the founding of the American, the president had to obtain the support of various state consortia, otherwise Washington could not even raise military funds for the War of Independence, and the power structure of the American formed a form of local governments balancing the central government.On the contrary, China has always been led by a central government (emperor) that continuously expanded to the surrounding areas, in order to unite the ruled ethnic groups and classes, China has formed a system where the central government has delegated power to various local governments to manage the country, and local governments must be responsible for the central government.
@@marvinwilliams7938 I’m not sure if there are any potential causal relationships of the two schools of thoughts developing, as opposed to parallel similarities if that’s what you’re wondering. As from my awareness of broader history (bits covering the last 3 millenia or so) the two regions would’ve -more likely traded in goods rather than thoughts via the decentralized Silk Routes- since 114 BCE Correction: I rechecked from public knowledge, and it seems that there were thought exchanges too, but it would’ve gone through various translations and local appropriations to retain information integrity and it’s unclear (at least from my quick skim of the summary) to which region & direction of the route the thoughts was shared But in any case Confucius’ era was around 500 BCE, and Plato’s from around 400 BCE. So both predates the formation of the trade relations The similarities might be a convergence thing that developed independently correlated by political relevance and sociopolitical resonance with the idea, as the growing and/or predominant structure of governance at the time was monarchical
Excellent video. Congratulations on over 1 million views, very well deserved. Thank you for sharing some Chinese thinking to a larger audience. 2 years on since the making of this video, it is amazing to see Chinese philosophy of "encirclement" non-aggression, strategy, play out in real time with BRICS and their absolute domination in most major industries, including those emerging as the most important developing ones in the 21st century. On a personal note, as someone born and raised in America who has always taken issue with American exceptionalism and arrogance... it's kinda nice watching people wake up to the fact that they've been playing chess (and not even that well), against a supposed "opponent" who has mastered the art of Go.
I'm seriously so impressed with your content. You blow me away every time. Bless you for doing the research and teaching so effectively. I will definitely share this wherever I can.
I’m so grateful that I found your channel. My engagement in politics has always been from a visceral place, but over the past few years I realized that I need to engage in a more intellectual understanding of the subject so that I can be critical of my own opinions and more understanding of others. Your presentations are incredibly clear and thorough, and have helped me immensely. THANK YOU!
I hope u see this comment, I'm a Chinese student in G11 and I took a capstone class about postmodernism that used Jean Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation as the core text, I really love your video on those topics and just want to say I am deeply impressed by your videos' quality and objectiveness. U really understand the postmodernism and use it to your advantage learning about the world. thank you so much for this video.
Thanks for making these videos Ryan, very succinct, articulate and educational - most importantly impartial. More people need to understand the foundations of political thought and philosophy and how it’s led to the modern dynamics we’re observing today. I think it’ll help develop a more peaceful way forward for the world. This is valuable work in need of support!
That entire sectionon Marxism/the CPC (whose initialism this guy couldn't even spell correctly, proving his incompetence when it comes to discussing the subject) is just vapid nonsense. It's clear this guy never read any socialist theory in his life and never bothered researching the basics of Chinese politics.
@@lynth says the person who forgets to put a space between the words section and on. Anyway I’m not one for point scoring and prefer to update my knowledge if what I’ve learned is incorrect. If you’d be enlightened enough to point me to the literature you rate over this, I’ll read it and it would be appreciated. Thanks.
The origin of the Chinese word "美國” seems to have come from the word "亚美理驾" (ya mei li jia) which is the Chinese language pronunciation of "America", which was later shortened to "美國”. In translated names like these, the usage of these characters is not literal, but instead only for the sound they make. (I am a native Chinese speaker)
Yes, and maybe someone needs to point out that the Chinese country names are always positive, if possible, like "virtue country" (Germany), "hero country" (United Kingdom), "law country" (France), etc.
@@Biberbro well, if you translate the names by what they mean that's what you'll get, but most of them isn't translated to Chinese in this way, they simply find a Chinese character which sounds like the first bit of the English name and add "guo" which means nation. For example, Chinese for UK is 英国 （ pronounced as "in guo" , the first character "英” sounds like "En" for "England" ( That's why when some Chinese kids are studying geography they don't get it right, because sometimes they think UK = England, which is not true.)
@@xuepenggao1301 Of course, but they generally choose such syllables which are vaguely positive or at least neutral. E.g., "Ying" could be shadow, baby, husk etc., but they went for "hero".
Dear Mr. Ryan Chapman, I want all viewers to know I find Ryan's videos to be very accurate and inciteful easy viewing. Although he may lack actual experience in China with real life Confucian upbringing, he clearly made it up by reading many impartial books and documentaries. I am a 64 years old, 4th generation Singaporean living in Malaysia who is totally English educated, but brought up in a confucian and taoism background. i find his views refreshing, fair and rather accurate depiction between China and US. I do recommend American's and Chinese to follow your channel.
both joe and kayatechef are right. : insightful instead of inciteful. "made up for it" (or 'makes up for it') instead of "made it up" I agree with Mr. KokhinLim's opinion.
I have to thank you for, what seems to me, a wonderfully researched and balanced video. Trying to explain a topic of such immense complexity in such a short time is a feat in itself but having explained the concepts with so many illustrative and comprehensible manner is incredible. I have nothing but praise. Just a thought that I had. I seems to me that America is still being propelled by the enlightenment spirit of linear rationality. This may not be surprising as the country was founded on enlightenment ideals through the writings of Montesquieu, Locke and the founding fathers. (I am personally very drawn to the enlightenment ideal, it's very attractive and holy.) But the post-enlightenment thinking appears to have taken a turn, with romanticism and the Hegelian dialectic, seemingly sidelining strict rationality or logic as being subjected to the process of time and rendered insignifican. (This might be a vast generalisation and an unsophisticated manner of describing Hegal thought) Conincidentally, traditional Chinese thought had never had such strong emphasis on logic and strict rationality but rather on motion or movement. (perhaps analogous to Heraclitus, to a certain extent) So it would seem that Chinese political thinking coheres to a certain extent with post-enlightenment view. I would also say that the doctrinal basis of the US being rooted in enlightenment might face more challenges moving forward. (This is not to say China doesn't have significant issues, I do think the inconsistancy is much more severe under the Chinese system) Apologise for the long comment. A very rough and loose record of my thoughts whilst watching the video. No doubt very underdeveloped and problematic. I thank you again for your work in the video.
@@depreciatingasset I must have not understood what you mean. Are you saying that my post is 50 cent army post? What makes you say so? Which part of my comment strikes you as such? I would be delighted to know! Thanks!
@@MEGALEHANE I don't think it's balanced or thoughtful. Trying to frame the conversation as cultural differences is misdirection and subversion. I detailed why in a separate comment. Two major points is that first those same Chinese with the same culture seek the western countries but the opposite is not true. Second point, is that in the liberal democracies, you can be Chinese with lateral thinking and all cultural aspects and if you succeed, you'll become the dominant way of thinking and everybody will incorporate your ideas. Also the US or western liberalism isn't a judeochristian thinking. A judeochristian thinking with its ideal the abrahamic God is very much a feudal despotic Roman/ Egyptian/Mesopotamia version. The puritans, catholics evangelicals are example of Christian thinking. Western liberal democracy is a revolution on chrsitianity. So basically any framing of the China affair as a cultural difference is falling for CCP lines which are just another despotic tyranny regime with Chinese characteristics, much like Iran is tyranny with Islamic characteristics, Venezuela is tyranny with communist or militaristic characteristics. I think k the CCP is using Sun Tzu on the free world. Trying to fight and win with all other methods than conflict. But we are in a war
I’ve always been interested in other cultures and this was excellent and informative. I’m not good at articulating others content but I enjoy watching your videos. You’re calm and concise
Thankyou for such a well thought out presentation. I'm from England and my wife is Chinese. I travelled around China for 2 months last year and found the culture and history very interesting. Achieving a middle ground between socialism and capitalism is probably the best of both worlds. Respecting each other's cultures is also very important.
i’m an american undergraduate student studying political science, with a particular concentration on national security. after learning about clausewitz and sun tzu, about disputes in the south china sea and re-engineering the supply chain, about the strategies of biden versus xi- i have not seen a more important video than this one here. u present such critical and messy information so clearly and with nuance, while making it accessible and engaging. i still have a lot to learn, but i’m grateful to say that i wish i watched this video sooner, i’m glad i watched it now, and i can’t wait to watch it again and connect it to what i’ll continue to learn. thank you ryan!!!
i'm a Chinese in Beijing. and has been a designer for years. YUP. generally speaking, the West still don't understand China well. in short China is not communist country like USSR. China is a combination of socialism and captilism right now. basically Chinese governments have found a new way to run a country. in very short is: first the top leader Should has great experience to manager from the poorest village to biggest province, which is completely different from the democracy world. And the second difference is China would test a new policy in a city. if it works. spread to entire country. so when it test in a city. you can understand it is definitely a democracal policy. when it spread to entire country is kind of like an authority.
That entire sectionon Marxism/the CPC (whose initialism this guy couldn't even spell correctly, proving his incompetence when it comes to discussing the subject) is just vapid nonsense. It's clear this guy never read any socialist theory in his life and never bothered researching the basics of Chinese politics.
He missed the main point. Chinese people are no different than europeans or americans. The problem is they're exposed to only one political enviroment which warps their minds into a lateral way of thinking. China is doomed to fail unless rule of law and democracy is achieved.
As a Chinese, living in US for many years, I have to say that this is the best video I have ever seen comparing the culture between Chinese and western
@@maimunkatabg The comment states, "-the best video I have ever seen-". If you don't know all the video's they have watched then you are incapable of determining the statements accuracy.
As you asked, I will leave a comment regarding this video though I usually don’t, as you surmised. First, you excel at presenting your content is easily comprehensible chunks that allow the listener or viewer to digest fully and thus get the most out of it. Your clear and unbiased explanations also leave your audience able to appreciate the content without needing to do extra mental gymnastics in order to glean out the wheat from the chaff. Your examples are excellently chosen and illuminate your points in just the right light for more clarity and comprehension. Second, I have a better understanding of China’s political thinking style, as well as American now than I did before watching this video so if your intention was to better educate your audience, you have succeeded. My main take-away is the linear thinking style of American political thinking vs. the lateral style of the Chinese, though as you pointed out, there is in reality no absolute one way of thinking on one side or the other but more of a propensity to favor one style over the other. I guess another big take-away is that the Chinese see their rightful place on the world stage as a leader and a dominant power, if not the dominant power to be respected and acknowledged as such. And given their immensely long history as being such a power, it is understandable why they would think so. Given their decades long efforts to modernize their economy, civilian infrastructure, industrial capacity, and military infrastructure, it is foreseeable that they will achieve their long term goal to regain their former might and status as a central power in the world. I suppose the real question here is whether Americans will come to see this transformation as inevitable and thus not try to thwart it out of spite or out of fear of having to accept that their dominance is only temporary and perhaps short-lived, given the much grander scale of history that we are actually concerned with in looking at the big picture, or whether American stubbornness and sense of exceptionalism will lead to a direct conflict with China in which it will likely be that the American side will be the aggressors and the Chinese the defenders, as you pointed out at the end of this excellent video, is the historical stance in most of China’s experiences with war.
I’m a big fan of all of your videos so far; even though you have your own opinions, you clearly make every effort to summarize your topics even-handedly. I’m excited to see where this China series takes us!
Thank you Mr Chapman, I especially enjoyed your definition of fascism inclusive to the various references. Before your lesson, I never grasped the machination behind the rise of Mussolini and Hitler. I had wrongfully assumed that nationalism and ethnicity were random tools which arose from the turmoil of the times.
Brilliant. My wife is Chinese and I have visited China many times. You have captured impressions that I gained through experience whilst furnishing these with many quotations I was not aware of. One view I have formed is of the Utilitarian strands of Confucianism. This might be a bridge to some western concepts. I would say western utilitarianism might seek the happiness of the many, possibly at the cost of the few but in China the individual is not central to thinking as seen by the west. The common good is seen in collective terms. In this way they have found a different take on the collectivism of Marxism. We might be shocked to think that people may suffer to allow the system to maintain order but often in China such matters are dismissed as not of great importance. For them it is like teasing a tiger - you can expect to get hurt. So much for the underdog! The military aspects of what you say have often been explained to my by Chinese people I have met. It is however worth considering Face Culture which is perhaps not so far from Honour culture. They are proud and they expect to be respected. I am not defending China. What I say is simply how it appears to me.
Ryan, this was a real good, unbiased, examination and comparison of two conflicting political philosophy without saying one is more correct than the other. i really liked your analogy between chess and gungho when comparing lateral and linear thinking. amazing video!!
Ryan, your analytical ability to explain incredibly complex topics is just amazing. I've watched most of your channel and it has helped me understand and put in context our complicated modern world. Thank you for your effort and willingness to research and communicate your points of view.
Excellent, excellent videos. Can’t believe I just found your channel. Writing this comment simply to support you as your video quality is incredible, clear, succinct, and to the point. Thank you
Wow this is nice video. This pretty much summarized Chinese people’s mind set(I can say that because I’m Chinese lol). I’d like to add one note to the Chinese name for America. It’s called mei guo probably because most of Chinese names for countries are transliteration, so the Mei is likely coming from pronunciation of aMERica. Same goes to France(fa guo), Deutschland(de guo)
That entire sectionon Marxism/the CPC (whose initialism this guy couldn't even spell correctly, proving his incompetence when it comes to discussing the subject) is just vapid nonsense. It's clear this guy never read any socialist theory in his life and never bothered researching the basics of Chinese politics.
Well, there are many Chinese words that are pronounce as ‘mei’(around 80 of them), but the word 美’mei’, which means ‘beautiful’ was chosen. Similarly there there are many words that are pronounce as “Fa”, but the word 法“fa” that represent “law” wa s chosen.
Go as a game I felt shaped my thinking a lot. I think the "elliptic thinking" could benefit everyone. It's really fascinating when you win games by basically yielding every fight, giving your opponent all they ask for, and have them resign after they realize, they were asking for wrong things all along. It's such a weird dynamic and I can only imagine what impact such game would have on a culture after centuries.
Not bad for an American who's never been to China. I'm American and I've lived in China for the past 6 years and I still learned something. I also appreciate your disclaimers. It's true, if you want to tell the whole story about both sides you would need an entire archieve not just a book haha.
@@alldaydreamaboutfuckMerely a propaganda. Starting from the 5th minute, I held out on until that - in contrast, in the US the law is above all - and turned it off.
Ryan, I only came upon your channel recently and it already became my favorite content on youtube. You really have a deep and balanced understanding of all the topic matters, and you explain in a clear manner. Well-done, please keep it up. I will support it going forward.
Hi there. I’m glad you Americans finally get to know a little bit about China since we Chinese have taken quite a lot to learn from America 40 years ago. I have been to America since 2005 for the first time and then several times after that. I read tons of books and videos about America and write down almost a book about what I think America is. So I just want to say hello and try to know you individual.
I am amazed that youtube recommended me what appears to be such an impressive level of insight and elegant craft of respectful yet concise knowledge. Will be looking forward to learn something more from your channel!
The linear and lateral thinking has been the most difficult thing trying to explain to my mates when discussing chinas philosophy. Very well done to you sir.
The Chinese language itself lends to lateral thinking. Is the doctor in question a man or a woman? Depends on context, and most of the time, that doesn't even matter. What about terms like mother and father? Yes, they are gendered even in Chinese, but there's technically nothing stopping a man being called mother because of how the language works.
Thank you for your videos from which I learn a lot. It seems to me that you are always trying to explain things objectively and not according to your possible position, which is formidable, thank you again
I am amazed someone who doesn't speak Chinese and has never been to China can give such an accurate characterization of Sino-US differences. Every view point in this video is correct! There are millions of westerners living in China and millions of Chinese diaspora in the US. A lot of people have spoken foreign language for decades without truly understanding a different culture and form correct opinions. I wonder what you could do once you have mastered Chinese language.
I just want to say I appreciate the editing on your videos. I love that you display the cover art of the books you highlight in the bottom corner, makes it easy to snap a screenshot for reference later as needed. Looking forward to seeing you delve into the topic further, given the nature of these politically tense and confusing times!
Your points are great from a native Chinese's view. They are especially crucial in today's tension between China and the US. We are super needed to understand others thoroughly to avoid humanitarian disasters.
This channel is invaluable - well-researched, concise modules presented in the style of classical education (no overarching political agenda). I recommend you and share with many friends. I'm old and on a fixed income or I would certainly support you financially. I support you in every way I can. Keep 'em coming!!
As a Chinese, I really appreciate your work and got impressed by your understanding on China and Chinese mentality. It’s surprisingly accurate, even though there’s a lot inferring based on literal resource due to lack of actual experience living in China. I am one of those who don’t usually leave comments. But I just wanna leave this to tell you that this video is very helpful for me to explain Chinese cultural mentality to westerners. Thank you very much for the effort on learning all this.
@@bestestAIsongs But there are more and more people in China who using VPN to watch UA-cam. If they do not spread the content which is sensitive，the government just don't mind that.
I never expected the contents to be so balanced and insightful particularly putting Dr. Kissinger’s observations of Mao comparing to Socrates. So building on that statement, I would argue Go is multiple dimensional with much more probability of outcomes than that of chess. Socialism/Communism/Capitalism are gross generalization of social and political structure. As of now, the goal for China government and people are fully aligned and that is to achieve co-prosperity and reach another level of human civilization (星辰大海）by collaboration and eradication of zero sum game mentality.
You wanna know if you found a good person making video essays about controversial/divisive topics? they put in disclaimers, they tell you flaws, they tell you to take things with a grain of salt. they are intellectually honest, like this guy.
Absolutely. Fortunately/Unfortunately for those who took the effort to understand war, money & reality from works like Sun Wu's Art of War, Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations & Carl Sagan's Vision of Humanity, s/he/they will realise there exist many who will seek profits/opportunities from this crisis. This may explain why many elites/experts from states like US, China, EU, India, UK, Russia, AU, Brazil, etc. groups like IMF, WHO, UNP, RSF, ICC, WFP, TSB, POG, etc. & firms like Apple, Tencent, Samsung, Nestle, Loreal, Tata, Sony, Siemens, etc. are already making their moves in the cyber/shadow space.
found your stuff the other day and wow I feel like I've gained so much insight in a short time, its really shown me how much I don't know about some very complicated but incredibly interesting stuff.
Just discovered Ryan Chapman and I thoroughly enjoy both his content and his delivery style. His attempt to be objective and open minded is a killer method for those of us who long to avoid the slanted agendas being broadcasted today. Awesome job Ryan!
In the past 2 days, I have watched more than 10 of your videos, including the longer one. I just want to appreciate you and your efforts in preparing these excellent resources. Thank you, Ryan.
I grew up in the southern US where the idea of China invading the US is treated somewhat like an inevitability, not that it’s imminent, but everyone has the idea in the back of their heads. Phrases people like to say, like “we’ll all be speaking Chinese one day”, family members giving ominous warnings to my sisters for listening to C-Pop music, things like that. So the last segment on war, I found very interesting of course but also comforting. I guess it goes to show how if you grow up in a historically militaristic country, that’s exactly what you’d be afraid of other countries doing to you.
lol, China invade US, you poor guys got brainwashed by the US regime propaganda so hard. Supressed by the police and has no human rights. Know nothing about the truth outside in the real world.
As a Chinese person, I really appreciate how you showed tremendous respect for Chinese political philosophy because this philosophy not only determines the functioning of government but also impacts the cultural identity of ordinary Chinese people like me. I think the Chinese political system can benefit from more linear thinking so that the law becomes more inflexible and less subject to the government's interpretation of it.
The "linear thinking" sounds like no-doubt thinking to me, where's your critical thinking, that you might admire and promote I guess. Hah. don't you feel that the "lateral thinking" might actually be the logic one?
@@russianfund Lateral thinking is intuitive, non-axiomatic, and prone to circularities. In a very real way, it is entirely void of logic, at least in any philosophical sense of the word. There's an important difference between "good thinking tool" and "good logical foundation". My synthesis of the two says that you should "scout" laterally, and then verify vertically. So no, I don't think lateral thinking is "more" logical. In fact, I'd go further to say it is dangerous to confuse it as logic at all. But something doesn't have to be logical (ie deductive, inductive, or abducive) to be useful. Maybe you could even say "transductive" for lateral thinking, but that's actually a well-defined thing, and lateral thinking still isn't logical. It's analogical.
@@MrRedstonefreedom I agree that lateral thinking is Not "more" logical. Because the concept of logic itself is linear as how a computer chip was built these days with silicon binary gates which are predictable and certain in form of Yes(1)/NO(0). Lateral thinking believes in real world the situations are more complex than that and involve more parameters. Even that will change over time and progression. This resembles what we see in Quantum mechanics that we need to factor in more such as time, probabilities, uncertainties and even our own observations etc. Just like the universe won't simply itself for us. It is what it is. It's up to us to change perspective and shift paradigm to understand/adapt to it better.
Yes. Indeed. But i was actually hoping for dinner Eastern philosophy. That's not what this video offers. I feel like I've been intellectually click baited
@@MrRedstonefreedom No, I don't need to scout anything, you believe in whatever you way like, help yourself. I don't choose way of thinking, In my linear thinking, democracy is good, but your definition of democracy may not be universally good, so you try to spreed your "democracy" could be not as good as you think. So I think the author's is confusing and not logic.
I was just discussing with my wife how we were unsure how the two different nations operated in terms of politics. I really enjoy your videos! They're always so informative, and while I can definitely sense some personal opinion in your content, they do a great job of not applying judgement to the topics and allowing room for consideration of new ideas. Thank you for all the work you put into your videos!
Only seen a few videos, but they are extremely well researched and I think you do an excellent job at taking as objective of a look into these topics as possible. Ill definitely be looking into more of your content.
I am currently studying International Relations with a focus on Foreign Policy and Security Studies in the region of Asia so when I got this video in my recommended I was super interested. This is my first video by you Ryan and I am blown away. This was amazing, and I am definitely coming back for more! Keep up the good work!
I'm taking an upper level class on East Asian politics in college this semester, and watching stuff like this in advance is making me feel a lot better about it. Thanks for the awesome video!
As a Chinese national, I have to say that I'm impressed by your effort trying to understand the different mentality of not just the Chinese politics, but the Chinese culture in general, instead of simply generalizing the US and China into 'democratic' or 'authoritarian', 'us' or 'them', 'good' or 'evil'. The two types of mentalities are just different, and we approach problems and have them solved differently, as you've mentioned. And if all the politicians on both sides make more effort to understand each other's positions and to find common ground, there will be much less animosity and antagonism, and the world would be a much better place than it is today. I seriously appreciate your effort.
One thing China does that the USA doesn't...... China punishes their elites. In the USA you can attempt to overthrow the government, but if you are a connected elite like Trump and his gang you just get a slap on the wrist and can run for president again. /boggle The elites in the USA live by their own set of rules. And none of their rules come with harsh punishment. But it's been going on for a long time and Trump is the culmination of not punishing those in power. Eventually someone comes along that will ruin everything.
It's always a good idea to understand the opponent, but not necessary, or even good, to find common ground. After all, knowing your enemy is half the battle.
I agree but only if you consider the other side an adversary. Chinese people didn't view the US as an adversary until the Trump administration. We viewed the US as a trading partner. But all of a sudden the US started to feel the threat that China may create to its global hegemony (though most Chinese people don't even consider ourselves to have that capacity), and it started to derogate and villify everything China does. We didn't want to be an enemy, but when the other side said to the whole world that 'this is our public enemy here', what else can you do?
Thank you to everyone who supports these projects on Patreon. I wouldn't be able to devote so much time and so many resources to one video otherwise. I'm trying to make the best work I can, and the donations really do make it possible. If you'd like to chip in and support me, check out www.patreon.com/rchapman. Video notes below.
Many are questioning the 'rule of law in the USA' section of this video after the July 1st 2024 SCOTUS ruling, which said that presidents are presumed to be immune from prosecution for official acts as outlined in the constitution. Frankly I don't disagree. It does seem to throw the concept of rule of law in the USA into question. We're in an unprecedented moment in American history, and the best I can say here is that we'll have to see how it plays out in practice.
It also occurred to me that I should clarify what I meant at the end, saying 'the basic story of China is the story of a country that's kept to itself.' I was feeling pressure to wrap up the video and was probably too brief there.
1) I was referring to the last, say, 2000 years of Chinese history, roughly since China unified under the Qin dynasty.
2) That's a relativistic argument, saying that China has been remarkably nonaggressive considering its size and power throughout history. China has, throughout most of those 2000 years, mostly kept to itself. It has been aggressive on occasion, particularly to countries bordering it, but those instances are rare when comparing China to other great powers. Also, like I said in the video, that might be changing. China might be becoming more aggressive in the 21st century. That's yet to be born out in a hot war, but many argue that we're seeing signs of it. Hopefully that added some clarity and nuance.
I saw many comments taking issue with me saying the CCP is above the law. Most seem to be coming to the conclusion that the law is above the CCP by pointing at cases where members of the CCP are tried by the court system (like when members are tried for corruption). If that's your view, it seems that you're not understanding the concept of rule of law. I made a follow-up video elaborating on that: ua-cam.com/video/RK5X-tIA_AI/v-deo.html
Lastly, if you're wondering why I didn't cover Legalism in this video, I saw that as being one 'ism' too far for an introductory video. The basic dynamic between Legalists and Confucians was that Legalists tried to push China towards a country governed by law (though this never translated into rule of law, where even the highest political authorities are constrained by law), and the Confucians tried to push China in a direction where elders and leaders ruled via their discretion, not law. Influence from Legalists meant that China had a fairly strong legal tradition from fairly early on, but never rule of law, which is still true to this day. In hindsight, I probably should have cut about a minute of 'linear vs. lateral' and added a little section on Legalism.
- Ryan
The purpose of war is to steal resources or manipulate another group of people into achieving your goals. It is costly and destructive, typically with both sides losing resources and resentment built between the two peoples.
China uses different means to manipulate other groups of people into achieving its goals. In general those manipulations take longer but are far less risky if any one part of them fails.
For example, the belt and road initiative is being used to do several things, increase trade with China, place countries into debt with China forcing their partnership regardless of political shifts, and breakout of containment by American military forces which are placed strategically around China(and match them in case of conflict). The belt and road has suffered multiple rejections and failures, yet is still largely successful.
-----
I just want to say I also appreciate that this pinned response is from 7 days ago even if the video was posted months ago.
"Kept to itself" is a euphemism for being at constant conflict within, subjugating and exterminating it's own population.
Zhong (Middle) Guo (Country) = Zhong Guo is definitively accurate.
Chinese aggression is different than more traditional aggression. most dynasties would threaten another country and they would pay tribute to China. a couple of dynasties even considered themselves as rulers of the world, in which in their eyes if something was on their official maps then they owned it, only allowing others to govern the regions in their stead should they remain prosperous. if the tribute was smaller than they would like they would send their armies and punish the nation by overthrowing it and letting someone else rule it. this didn't happen too much as the nations understood what would happen if they didn't offer enough tribute, and if they forgot they would be reminded by an emissary from China. in other words China has a history of not respecting other's autonomy, while they tended to not conquer (relative to the west of course).
@@yamhweeyeo3089 The host’s spelling of China in Pinyin is certainly correct, i.e. Zhong Guo. But his pronunciation of it is just as certainly wrong. As his elaboration above alluded to, the correct pronunciation more closely approximates ‘jong’ rather than ‘chung’ where the j/ch should be an UNaccentuated sound. I’m assuming yours is not a case of misreading (of what he wrote) in which case I do encourage you to familiarise Pinyin pronunciation as it was designed precisely to enable non Mandarin native speakers to learn the modern standard pronunciation of China’s national language.
Before China created the Pinyin system of pronunciation, westerners learnt Mandarin using the Wade-Giles system of pronunciation. In that system, China’s name in Mandarin would be correctly written as “chung guo” whereas Chapman’s pronunciation in that same system would effectively become “ch’ung guo” (i.e. Chapman’s pronunciation accentuated the consonant of the first word, which is incorrect). Hope this explanation using Wade-Giles system more clearly points out where Chapman’s pronunciation is in error.
Don't be embarrassed to promote yourself! You're awesome (researched, well spoken, without being overly emotional) The world needs more people like you!
@loudnsounds and i think what you agree with is pro-china propaganda!! you can legit throw that word around for anything that disagrees with you lol
@loudnsounds dogmatic American textbooks like “the art of war” right?
@loudnsounds You have comprehension issues. He never characterized CCP as conservative. He mentioned that CCP has both the conservative and progressive. But for the CCP socialism is conservative whereas anything that shifts from that is progressive which is the direct opposite of American thinking.
@@kattttt9585 this is why I kinda love the video, because the people who are on both "sides" will think the video's opinion is on the other side. Brilliant work
@@jimmerskrimmerfriddet3246
I have a huge text I have yet to read it.
I loved the maps.
Really great content. We have an old saying here in China "当局者迷，旁观者清" can be loosely translated to "the chess player cannot see the whole view, while the bystanders are capable of having a better take". Sometimes we need other perspectives from people from different cultures and political atmospheres, it helps us grow!
That’s a really admirable mindset.
Roy Zed. Reminds of this quote: "Those involved are confused; outsiders see it clearly". BTW, Chinese play Go.
@@fredtan1506 Probably the same one. I just loosly translated that one. btw I really don't know why "围棋" is translated to "Go".
@@royzed2039 maybe because of Japanese?
@@alexdeng2418 Probably because he is using a genericl term for chess/qi in Chinese.
When you say Chess in English, it is by default Western Chess. In Chinese, Qi has no such default and remains a generic term.
Chinese chess is known as XiangQi or "elephant chess".
Western Chess is called GuoJiXiangQi or "international elephant chess".
What is called Go in Japan and West is known in China as WeiQi or "surrounding chess"
British/Australian here who spent nearly 30 years living in Asia, nearly 20 of those in China. Love your channel; always learning something new. Unfortunately, due to ill health, I'm retired and living on a disability pension, otherwise I would happily support you on patreon. Keep up the great work and if I'm ever in a position to donate to a channel, yours will be the first 👍
我是一个中国人，我希望您能够保持健康。
I don’t usually comment on videos like this but this is such a well made video. I couldn’t have explained this topic any better myself as someone who immigrated to the US from China when I was 14.
As someone who teaches Chinese language, I find the lateral thinking part is reflected in the language itself. Chinese languages (regardless of regional varieties) rely heavily on context. In European languages, a verb as simple as it is, can carry a lot of information. For example, "to go" is the infinitive form, it only bears the semantic meaning. No other information can be extracted from it. But when you conjugate it, like "goes" you instantly know when this action happens (present), how many people are doing the action (only one and it has to be the third person). English is one of the least "flavourful" ones, comparing to Spanish, French, Greek, Portuguese, Russian, German etc. If you add Latin to that mix it is even crazier. But in Chinese languages, a verb is a verb. No tense, no number, no subject-verb agreement. If you ask how do you know when the action happens? You will get this answer "depends on the context." "How do you know whether it's a he or a she?" "Well, from the context, duh?" "How do you know that the person means 'to cause' and not 'faeces'?" "Again, from the context! Why would faeces suddenly appear in a sentence about good news and excited?"
Kidding aside, it is very true that there isn't any inherent dualism or dichotomy in Chinese culture. Things are never either back or white. This extends to the our inventions. Why invent so many different knives when you can have one that does everything? Why invent so many pots and pans when a wok can do all those things just fine? Why have a dessert fork, dining fork, salad fork, pitchfork when you can have a pair of chopsticks? Because in the end, if you only allowed to choose a wok or a pan, wok can always accomplish more. When asked is a wok a pan or a pot? The answer is always "it depends."
Very true
Simply wonderful
I once bought a book which explains chinese writing symbols and was amused and fascinated. Like one tree is wood, three trees is forest. The funniest of all is this character which consists of a house and three women. One house one women is harmony. One house three women is chaos. And Chinese usually think in terms of surroundings. Good and bad is not a straight line.
Beautifully worded, thank you
The dualism of the Western world, which simply divides the world into democratic and undemocratic, may be largely influenced by Christianity, because in the worldview described by monotheism, the world is a dualism between God and Satan. Due to the influence of monotheism, Western countries regard the democratic system as a For a gospel, they think they have an obligation to spread the gospel of democracy. In their eyes, China is so strange. Basically, it is equivalent to a heretic. In their eyes, even if China is successful now, it is not worth mentioning that a heretic is a heretic. Unless China adopts the same system as them
Such a well-made video. Its rare to see a Westerner who actually tries to understand the Chinese and their way of thinking, and not just blindly criticize and regard them as a threat. The world would be a much better place if people are more educated and more understanding to different cultures and values.
Thanks for putting in the time to research about China.
Very informative, I have a fresh, broader perspective on my own culture.
I’m making my own videos about China from the perspective of someone who came from Hong Kong.
And wish to share it with you in the hope of starting a meaningful dialogue. (I will send you the link, it’s going to be from a different Google account)
P.S. I watch all your other videos, no one that’s they are all very well researched
“The world would be a much better place if people are more educated and more understanding to different cultures and values.”
The number of laws a nation has is inversely proportional to the understanding that nation has for “different cultures and values.”
The world will be a better place, inevitably. The forces of oppression and ignorance in the West are only as powerful as their veil of ignorance is free of being pierced. Every little bit helps, and the Internet has proven to make the obliteration of those prejudice-fueled barriers an inevitably; as much as it's made it possible for hatred and ignorance to cultivate and spread in isolated echo chambers, it has, more importantly, enabled the gradual and accelerating evaporation of most of the global echo chamber(s), albeit at a pace that's generational in nature. Nonetheless, barring a successful resurgence and rise to power of fascism in the Western core, again, that would be capable of dismantling global internet infrastructure, it'll only take as long as it takes for the unhelpably ignorant to die of old age and their progeny grow up in a world with acceleratingly abundant wisdom their forebears were inoculated and propagandized against. Ironically made inevitable by the sheer capitalistic profitability of the Internet, functionally guaranteeing conservative-capitalist impotence.
lol The world would be a much better place if people are more educated and more understanding to different cultures and values.
tell that to the fookin chinese. but we should stop talkin with those mainland midgets and cut them off entirely from new technologies.
yeah but then how would the political elite of my country trick me into hating you for no actual real reason!?
To understand Chinese politics you need to understand "Socialism with Chinese characteristics" So what are the CHINESE characteristics to socialism?
To put it simply, it's a combination of Confucianism and Legalism (surprised the video didn't even mention Legalism, which is just as important to Chinese politics as Confucianism)
Confucianism relies on people knowing their place to attain social harmony, but of course that is not always the case, So Legalism uses the Law to MAINTAIN social harmony, so the aim is the same as Confucianism, but the method is different.
Legalism is realist thinking, Confucianism is Idealist thinking
Mao's social campaigns often uses Legalism to attack Confucianism. Fun fact, Mao is a great admirer of Qin Shihuang, the first Emperor of China that instituted Legalism to China in 221 BC
Although the description about Deng's idea of "crossing the river by feeling the stones" is well explained, but it does NOT explain the entire implications of it. Due to the ambiguity of Deng Xiaoping on Laws rules and pretty much everything, has led to massive problems of corruption and nepotism. Where unwritten rules or unspoken laws might be prioritized over actual laws.
Xi Jinping, on the other hand hates these unwritten and unspoken rule and laws, If he wants to extend his terms, he does not do what Deng did, which is to pull the strings behind the screen and PRETEND not to be in power, Xi could easily done that without touching anything, HOWEVER, that would continue the cycle of nepotism and corruption.
Some say that Xi is power hungry for doing it, but I beg to differ, Xi is not Mao and never will even if he tries, Mao can turn on the Party, but Xi is no where near as powerful, he is a product of the Party, So what he does MUST have the general blessing of the Party, and the way I see it is that his term extensions were agreed upon by the Party to fix the problems the Party and the country might have.
To extensively reform China, and the Largest political party in the world is no easy task, and 10 years is nowhere near enough.
So, my prediction is, the before Xi Jinping retires, he will institute a more rule based power transition, due to his disdain about unwritten rules and retired Party elders engaging in nepotism.
Very good observation. I totally agree with you.
Well done
Very good summary.
profoundly observed.
Is the use of “elders” intentional? 🐸
At long last, a video about the subject without preconceived notions of what is correct and what is wrong, but purely as an exploration of what is.
Well done!
The "what is" is missing out on a lot though, and can be far more subjective than you think. For one, "lateral thinking" is presented to be flexible, but using his example, the different between Deng's and Xi's "socialism with Chinese characteristics" can also be explained away by the lack of real goals or ideology other than to keep the CCP in power.
Another example, that the Chinese were never the aggressors in history, is flat out wrong. Every neighbour has been invaded by Han Chinese in the past, see Tibet, Vietnam, Korea. Look up the Sui, Tang, Ming, Qing dynasties.
@@LostLEGION123compare with the western, sry I think this is conservative enough
Totalitarian governments is wrong. Censoring people for criticism is wrong. Stealing land from neighboring countries is wrong. Threatening to invade and take a country that you’ve never owned is wrong.
@@imelliamif stealing land is wrong a whole lot of modern first world countries have a lot to answer for
@@LostLEGION123 tbf they only invaded Tibet when they wouldn't agree to eradicate slavery and serfdom
As a southeast Asian Chinese who's studied in the West, your explanation and arguments are succinct and clear. You've just earned my sub. Looking forward to more!
Brilliant. Finally some quality intellectual content. Doesn’t dumb anything down to an absurd level and makes information accessible with clear and precise definitions and examples.
If you are the one who wrote the script then truly you are someone who is on such a level that many scholars and politicians would respect.
Making such a complex topic into a 20 minute video essay with high level commentary. Amazing.
Not even going to mention the charisma of a man that does not try to speak bs or to play on emotion. These days it’s rare to see in any media.
CCP = The Emperor and the imperial court ?
Really?
This is probably my favorite social/political commentary channel because Ryan is so even-keeled, careful, and yet thorough to a good extent given his video durations.
What a great effort you bring in your videos. Such complex things explained in such ease and brief. Continue enlightening us
I generally learn more about a topic in a 20-minute video from Ryan Chapman than I've known in my prior 71 years. This is especially true for topics like China, where I didn't know much to begin with, but also for topics like liberalism, where I thought I knew a lot.
@Kian Hong Chua ?
Excited to hear more of this China content. As always, thrilled to hear your insightful and objectivist takes on... everything you've covered so far.
Brilliant content. It's so rare to find a Westerner acknowledging the fundamental but equally valuable differences between US and Chinese political thinking. Bravo!
American exceptionalism: arrogance and ignorance. And 800 military bases in 120 countries.
@@wnklee6878 fools with guns is a bad combination for all of us.
@@tegusentertainment8021 But it has worked well. America obeys only one law: the law of the jungle.
@@wnklee6878 America those know what they're doing as far as monopolizing violence and military superiority. Except, China seems to knows America better than we do while we know nothing of China.
@@tegusentertainment8021 What do Americans know about real America? ua-cam.com/video/guQw3nSkXMY/v-deo.html
Well the whole no one’s above the law part doesn’t apply anymore as of today
An unpleasant surprise that THAT was the part that didn't age well. 🥴
was just thinking that. what a frightening time in America right now
He was talking about the ability to impeach a president that breaks the law. That has not changed.
It was never true, in the US, corporate is above the law.
@ReivWW not what he's talking about. He's talking about the president. The Supreme Court ruled that anything he does legal or not as president is non-prosecutuable. As long as he says it's an official duty of the office, he cannot be prosecuted. Assassinate a sitting supreme court justice? He can order seal team 6 to do just that. It's insane.
I really like your stripped down analysis of essential concepts. I've been struggling to make the Chinese case to Americans, and you handed me all tools and analogies. Excellent work. Solid writing.
As Chinese, I’m amazed by the accuracy, objectivity, and depth of this video. Hope can see more videos like this.
me too
Thank you so much for your viewpoint! I'm from the US and admire much about your country.
我看看
一点也不准确好么，一堆错误，你认为它准确客观只能证明你在对中国文化的理解上也是个二把刀。左派右派定义的混淆，左就是progressive,右就是 conservative，这是词源上注定的，你想混合地描述，可以，但只能针对一个群体在特定问题上的态度而且要给context，而不能做整体性的概括，否则都不叫人类能理解的话了，就像说红是墨色的而黑是赤色的一样，您这搞文学创作呢？还有对把所有中国的思维元素都归在儒家里，甚至儒家对此的理念完全相反，比如儒家是非常线性且不灵活的，非线性的整体观和灵活性这俩实际上来源于道家，inaggrassive也不是儒家的，儒家讲究入世，大有为，aggrassive到头了好么，兼爱非攻那是墨家的。另外拿孙子兵法一个纯纯的方法论去反过头去阐释世界观也是没谁的
@@chenyangge7451 我觉得你说的很有道理，让我意识到我在这方面的了解非常浅薄，谢谢你的指正。我评论的初衷和我比较喜欢这个视频的点是在于博主有尝试跳出大部分视频里那种西方普遍的固有视角，从一个相对来说更客观的角度思考中国文化和体制。我觉得能做到这一点已经是难得了，这样的视频也能抛砖引玉让更多人从不一样的视角来看这个问题，我觉得难能可贵。关于中国文化这方面的错误，我觉得非常惭愧，说明了我的知识储备和理解深度的欠缺，今后会慢慢补充并加以注意。谢谢！
Terrific! I’ve been in China many times, spending about a year there in the aggregate, and know many Chinese people from many walks of life, many quite educated. For someone who’s not a China expert, acknowledging the generalizations, you nailed it. Love your channel. I think your research and presentations are exceptional.
This guy is more of a China experts than all the so-called “China experts”
@@LSC69 True, the so called "China experts" are just arguing with each other, instead of saying anything revelant
First hand of experience should be cherished
This is a good video. I’ve been studying China and East Asian politics for 40 years and this has been the best understanding of the Chinese approach to governance I’ve seen on YT.
This is the first time that I have really looked into Chinese philosophy and I am blown away and intrigued by the differences. Thank you Ryan.
Hi Graeme if you liked this I think you'd love my channel where I make vlogs and newsy vids straight from China (I'm Canadian).
Evil would be a much better word to use, other than philosophy. The CCP makes millions of dollars removing organs from Falun Gong practitioners while they are alive and selling the parts to rich westerners. To get the practitioners to sign donation forms the CCP uses brutal torture techniques. I know an elderly Chinese lady who had an electric cattle prod put into her vagina. Wall Street and the American news media are aware of a lot of these atrocities but spell human right$ like that.
This was very well researched and presented. I always wondered about China's political philosophy but most sources are very Anti Chinese so I am happy to find someone who can explain it in a more Neutral way.
The entire left, which makes up almost the entirety of media, is very pro China.
It's almost like old school reporting
China collapsing demographically and economically and politically in one decade. Is anyone seeing it coming? I think the CCP does. A cornered cat can make strange leaps...
Try reading some of Ray Dalio's books - he has had tons of experience with top Chinese leaders. And those experiences get mentioned as you read the books.
Mostly though, it boils down to "Long term oriented, committed to country's future over over other goals. Sensible with respect to the actual realities they are facing."
Being aligned on "what benefits the country" is not a bad position for government. Even if that view is obviously limited by the comprehension of the leaders.
same in China
Really impressed with this foray into understanding the differences. I observe these gaps in understanding all the time, unfortunately even amongst most of my foreign policy peers who only frame society and history in a linear/vertical way.
meh... I didnt like his hand-wavey attack on dengism. He basically just ignored all existing chinese leftist theory to say "yeah theyre just capitalist lol"
@@RockPile_ I don't understand your comment. Deng expresses the ultimate in Chinese pragmatism which is the point of Chandler's presentation. "I don't care what colour the cat is as long as it catches mice". Maoism failed. In China human nature which drives capitalism is no longer suppressed but given wide range in the interest of prosperity and social harmony as long as everyone respects the authority and guidance of the CPP. Allowing people to get rich by their own efforts and to enjoy the rewards so generated is the essence of enlightened and effective governance.
Joshua, I understand exactly what you mean, and have heard many Westerners do such a poor job of introducing China and Chinese "thinking" I was prepared for one more on that long list of failures. I thought he did the best "beginner" overview for the lay person, with respect for all, I may have ever listened to. Best wishes for your health and prosperity. Pat
How does it feel to work for the modern day Gestapo against your homeland?
@@ericyendall3292 I wouldn't say Maoism failed, just it's not immediately applicable. It is hard to argue against Maoism's effectiveness in unifying a broken country with very few resources. It's not very good at growth though.
After the recent Supreme Court decision for executive immunity, 7:10 did not hold up very well
Absolutely the one part of the video I did not agree with. Ideally that is what American principles are, yet the law is incredibly flexible for those with power/resources to bend it.
I was just thinking the exact same thing lol
@@Muck-da in fact, capital is above all.
@@Muck-da Didnt he literally say that people are occasionslly not punished according to the law but this causes outraged
@@Boingus- Does it cause outrage though? Everytime a poor person goes to jail for criminal homelessness, no one says anything. When only one guy goes to jail for crashing the 2008 housing market, we bail out the banks and continue on as if nothing happened.
I am Chinese. I have to say your explanation of China, in general terms, is pretty good. Yep, the US vs China is kind of binary thinking vs spectrum thinking. You did a good job to help different cultures to understand each other better so we all can get along. Thank you.
it's not pretty good, it's deep, refreshing and insightful. I have to say we need more people like him on the planet, if people like Ryan can be the US president, the Chinese Chairman and other political leaders at the same time, world peace and prosperity will be achieved. I have to say this is the first time I feel like I fell in love with a person because of his wisdom and horizon.
@@佚名-n8h how are you guys on UA-cam? Isn’t UA-cam banned in china?
@@starkiller578 Firstly, there are large population of Chinese people and offspring that live oversea. People in China can access things like Google and UA-cam with VPN, which is theoretically not allowed, but practically never banned and not very difficult to get.
@@starkiller578 thanks for your concern, actually there are a lot of Chinese citizens using VPN to watch UA-cam like me, although it is quite illegally, the police have no interest in arresting people for that kind of reasons (flexible laws again) As long as you don't spread political sensitive message and porn or something illegal inside the GFW
In America we have flexible laws too. That’s the one thing I didn’t get about this video. What is Unitary Executive Theory (which brings a great deal of power to the executive when we know America’s founders were worried about the problems inherent in monarchy) if not a flexible interpretation of the constitution because of a new political context? To give a better example, we also outlaw pirating in America (downloading shows and movies and music outside of proper channels) but it’s not something the police look into. And the idea that presidents can be held accountable just because they’re in theory a private citizen doesn’t hold out in practice. Basically, I think the video maker compared how China appears to be in practice to how America is supposed to be in theory, especially when it comes to the law subject. The discussion on lateral thinking and most other points were great, though I can’t debunk half of them bc I’m not a China expert or Chinese.
I am a Chinese who both absorb from not only east but west, I read the ancient classics of both in China and West. Your observation is so detailed and you unveil the nuances between China and USA, thank you for making this video.
你研究的是哪类中国历史？ 他说错了你还认可？ 一定是假账号。
Essentially China just keeps things ambiguous so they do not need to be fully committed as there will always be another interpretation if things go wrong.
Heyo, I'm curious, what do you think the english 'classics' are? What are some Chinese classics that you believe every Chinese citizen has read?
I hope you are feeling good today. Have a great day :)
@@repacharge431There are classics I think you might be interested that we call as the 'Four Classic Chinese Novels', which are 'Journey to the West', 'Dream of the Red Chamber'(this one a bit boring in my opinion), 'Romance of Three Kingdoms', and 'Outlaw of Marsh'. If you are interested in the influence of development of contemporary China, you can read works done by Lu Xun (鲁迅) after some knowledge of modern history of China. Other than those that I mention, there are a whole lot more works like ancient Chinese poems and etc that we learnt when we were in school. Btw, some of the modern works that younger generations like is some of the sci-fi work by Liu cixin like 'The Three Body Problem' Trilogy.
I'm glad that you have interest in Chinese classics and is fully welcome to answer them furthermore if you like
Any recommendations for Chinese & West classics?
I never heard of this term but as a mainland Chinese I have to say the "lateral thinking" thing is spot on. I grew up with my dad always saying things like "the only thing certain is uncertainty". Chinese people deal so much with flexibility and human relations, thats probably why we have a hard time accepting religion, democracy or so called "universal values". I guess the linear way of thinking is great for science or specific study, lateral thinking is good for handling complex human relations, morality etc which are difficult to be solved by law.
Didnt singapore and taiwan have democracy too?
@@kekbin1697 Not sure about singapore for Taiwan yes, they had their first election in 1996. I'm generally pro-democracy, I'm just saying between "linear thinking" and "lateral thinking" there should be more mutual understanding of each other, not like one system is completely superior or the other is pure evil that kind of statement.
Plenty of us linear westerners rejected religion as well. I still hold out hope for democracy but its also starting to seem illusory as well, and having the same ultimate purpose of placating and controlling the masses, an understandable goal for rulers, but not governors in a representative system…
@@schyllic imo there's no absolute truth to any physical and conceptual entities in this universe, and pretty much all man-made concepts are subject to manipulations. To be specific, I believe this current version of "democracy" proclaimed by the west is a perfect tool to reposition the people in positions of power in the "backstage", as opposed to the "front stage" like kings, queens, and others in the old days. If you think about it, this new stage is by far better at resolving the conflict of interest between the powerful and the weak, for the powerful of course. Plus if you read the entire history of Bourgeois revolution(ik ik people from the bourgeois sphere doesn't agree with this concept, for the very reason you stated in your comment actually) this becomes very clear.
The word democracy basically means an election system, it is not necessary to do any good for a community/country, somehow this word got translated into Chinese as 民主, meaning people is the master, government's function is to serving the people, however look at the current election system in the west, did it work in such a way?
Therefore nowadays when people bring up this word Democracy, many Chinese find it revolting. 😂
Thanks for taking the time to make these. It's rekindling my interest in these topics
2:55 this doesn't translate into much more than symbolic niceties 😅
China's name for most western countries are phonetic transliterations, using different preexisting characters that sound like each countries' name: Faguo ("lawful country", 法国) is short for Falanxi (France, 法兰西), Yingguo ("outstanding country", 英国) is short for Yinggelan (England, 英格兰), and here Meiguo ("beautiful country", 美国) is just short for Meilijian (America, 美利坚). They're not perfect transliterations, but they sorta sound like the original and they get the job done 😅.
I suppose unsurprisingly nice characters specifically were chosen to denote these names. I imagine it'd cause quite a stir if some country's name were translated into shit-land. But good observation anyway, and great video!
As a kid I always thought it was really funny that Japan's name for US is 米国 “rice” instead of 美国 "beautiful". I've actually never heard anyone say 亚美利加/坚 IRL
@@littlegreenclementine yea lol. just a really old etymological root lost to time
Tell that to Trump
the translation of the countries' names is well considered, including "信、达、雅“，which means accuracy \fluency\elegant, 'America' could be translated into "霉国” if we only consider the phonetic aspect, and that means "the mildewed country“.
@@omj7113 Ah I see
Interesting take. Though I am not usually a fan of general statements of cultural characteristics like "Americans are vertical thinkers" or "Chinese are lateral thinkers," I think in this case there's a certain truth to this observation, overly simplistic as it may be. I would argue that this is less an artifact of some essential cultural difference but rather the immediate consequence of two very different political systems. In two-party electoral systems like the United States, political actors must frame their policies and platform IN OPPOSITION to those of other political actors. This invites a sort of cycle where confrontational politics make their way into confrontational media, and so on. Hence, American political strategy is simple and straightforward precisely because of the need to make it easily digestible and discernable. On the other hand, one-party rule in China has meant that the CPC is the only legitimate authority in China. To get anything done, one must go through the party. This is not to say that political discussions do not occur in China, but rather that they take place in the context of party rule. Without the need to pander to voters, policymakers are free to design more elaborate, flexible, and contextual strategies and carry them out over much longer periods.
Another thing that should be emphasized is the internal governance mechanisms of the party. This is a massive topic deserving a video of its own but something like party discipline and unity (a huge priority of the current administration) which means that party members are not so much above the law but rather subject to a different set of (often stricter) rules of behavior.
Exactly !!! Too often the corruption crackdown by Xi Jing Ping has been painted as political witchhunt by western media. Hopefully someone here can work with Ryan to obtain enough material to debunk this notion.
I don't know how many people can get your points - you seemed to have majored in political science? Or extremely well-read, researched, on government and politics.
Thanks for sharing the extremely insightful thoughts -
"but rather subject to a different set of (often stricter) rules of behavior" very true. Party members get punished twice, one by the law, one by the Party rule.
I agree that western democracies are more open while policy disagreements in China are handled in private. Reminds me of parents arguing in front of children. There are times that sensitive discussions should be handled in private to avoid a new media circus which can be counter productive.
I heard from someone that used to live in China, that if you speak out against the government, they black bag you and you disappear. Dude said he saw it first hand in a subway.
What an excellent video....especially the linear and lateral thinking explanation. The Chess vs Go comparison. The extractions from "The art of War"
You truly have insight.
I think this is a really important video for everyone to see, especially the American public.
Ok.
Your channel is one of a kind. The algorithm stuff as you requested is the least i can do. Looking forward to your next video!
I definitely would love to see more content from you. This, for me, is one of the better channels to expand or even explain certain topics in a way that is more concise than my own observations.
I really like the way you condense incredibly broad topics into a clear presentation of the main points. Comparing and contrasting American and Chinese thought could easily take decades to understand thoroughly, but your explanation gives a comprehensible view in under a half hour. It is a great starting point to be able to allow discussion and exploration of points of view between people who may think they disagree. Thank you for this potential foundation for a rebuild of decent and civil society.
6:58 “The law is above all citizens in America… Even if the President is caught breaking the law, the President can be held accountable for it.”
This didn’t age well… 💀
lol
This seems to be a pretty fair unbiased presentation, which is difficult to come across.
It's nice to know that there are people in the US curious about China and actually going through great length doing all that research.
The points are solid.
I am literally amazed by the knowledge you had to acquire to back all this up.
I'd very much like to see your chanel grow.
The Mandarin word for "America" being "Mei Guo = Beautiful Country" is likely because "Mei" is a cognate of "aMERica"
Yeah basically. We do that a lot here in China and we tend to also add in great meanings in those translated names. For example for England we use "英国/Ying Guo". "英" means good-looking/handsome and also has the similar sounding as "En" in "England".
@@royzed2039 that's what happens when one lacks a phonetic writing system! It's a really cool feature of the language :)
@@royzed2039 come on 英 also means wisdom. England means a country of wisdom.
Germany， 德， means virtue，morality.
France 法 means law，standard, method.
All are good words.
Wrong. The term was coined by early Chinese immigrants to the USA (19th Century) and simply describes the natural beauty of the landscape they found. You are over-thinking it.
@@unreliablenarrator6649 Don't spread wrong information. It started as something like "亚梅利加兼合国" when Chinese people met American people for the first time then it got simpler like "美利坚合众国" then "美国". Nothing to do with your false statement.
Well done and insightful! Regarding the contrast of the people's views on authority in China and United States, I remember a Chinese philosopher (Dongyue Wang) said, that's due to the historical formation of societies. Chinese society is a very old one, which regarded authority as necessary to unite and organise people from different tribes and backgrounds to work together for public good, such as to combat natural disasters in ancient times (i.e. the flood of Huanghe river), so the Chinese society has been organised by the 'rule of human' (secular origin); whereas the people in United States see authority as repressive and self-interested, as the European settlers brought their trauma from their home countries where they were deprived and persecuted, so they treat authority with distrust, and prefer to be ruled by something 'transcending' human (judged by god)--'rule of law' (of religious origin). Which also explains the differences in modern societies.
I’d like to know the relationship between the Confucianism authoritarian philosophy with Plato’s Benevolent Philosopher King. Sounds extremely similar
In the early days of the founding of the American, the president had to obtain the support of various state consortia, otherwise Washington could not even raise military funds for the War of Independence, and the power structure of the American formed a form of local governments balancing the central government.On the contrary, China has always been led by a central government (emperor) that continuously expanded to the surrounding areas, in order to unite the ruled ethnic groups and classes, China has formed a system where the central government has delegated power to various local governments to manage the country, and local governments must be responsible for the central government.
@@marvinwilliams7938 I’m not sure if there are any potential causal relationships of the two schools of thoughts developing, as opposed to parallel similarities if that’s what you’re wondering. As from my awareness of broader history (bits covering the last 3 millenia or so) the two regions would’ve -more likely traded in goods rather than thoughts via the decentralized Silk Routes- since 114 BCE
Correction: I rechecked from public knowledge, and it seems that there were thought exchanges too, but it would’ve gone through various translations and local appropriations to retain information integrity and it’s unclear (at least from my quick skim of the summary) to which region & direction of the route the thoughts was shared
But in any case Confucius’ era was around 500 BCE, and Plato’s from around 400 BCE. So both predates the formation of the trade relations
The similarities might be a convergence thing that developed independently correlated by political relevance and sociopolitical resonance with the idea, as the growing and/or predominant structure of governance at the time was monarchical
Excellent video. Congratulations on over 1 million views, very well deserved.
Thank you for sharing some Chinese thinking to a larger audience.
2 years on since the making of this video, it is amazing to see Chinese philosophy of "encirclement" non-aggression, strategy, play out in real time with BRICS and their absolute domination in most major industries, including those emerging as the most important developing ones in the 21st century.
On a personal note, as someone born and raised in America who has always taken issue with American exceptionalism and arrogance... it's kinda nice watching people wake up to the fact that they've been playing chess (and not even that well), against a supposed "opponent" who has mastered the art of Go.
I'm seriously so impressed with your content. You blow me away every time. Bless you for doing the research and teaching so effectively. I will definitely share this wherever I can.
As a Malaysian Chinese, I think you have make the fairest representation of China in the whole of Western world. Bravo!
I’m so grateful that I found your channel. My engagement in politics has always been from a visceral place, but over the past few years I realized that I need to engage in a more intellectual understanding of the subject so that I can be critical of my own opinions and more understanding of others. Your presentations are incredibly clear and thorough, and have helped me immensely. THANK YOU!
I hope u see this comment, I'm a Chinese student in G11 and I took a capstone class about postmodernism that used Jean Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation as the core text, I really love your video on those topics and just want to say I am deeply impressed by your videos' quality and objectiveness. U really understand the postmodernism and use it to your advantage learning about the world. thank you so much for this video.
Thanks for making these videos Ryan, very succinct, articulate and educational - most importantly impartial. More people need to understand the foundations of political thought and philosophy and how it’s led to the modern dynamics we’re observing today. I think it’ll help develop a more peaceful way forward for the world.
This is valuable work in need of support!
That entire sectionon Marxism/the CPC (whose initialism this guy couldn't even spell correctly, proving his incompetence when it comes to discussing the subject) is just vapid nonsense. It's clear this guy never read any socialist theory in his life and never bothered researching the basics of Chinese politics.
@@lynth says the person who forgets to put a space between the words section and on.
Anyway I’m not one for point scoring and prefer to update my knowledge if what I’ve learned is incorrect. If you’d be enlightened enough to point me to the literature you rate over this, I’ll read it and it would be appreciated. Thanks.
Having lived and worked in China for 13 years in three different regions, this analysis is consistent with my own experience. Well done.
The origin of the Chinese word "美國” seems to have come from the word "亚美理驾" (ya mei li jia) which is the Chinese language pronunciation of "America", which was later shortened to "美國”. In translated names like these, the usage of these characters is not literal, but instead only for the sound they make. (I am a native Chinese speaker)
Yes, and maybe someone needs to point out that the Chinese country names are always positive, if possible, like "virtue country" (Germany), "hero country" (United Kingdom), "law country" (France), etc.
@@Biberbro well, if you translate the names by what they mean that's what you'll get, but most of them isn't translated to Chinese in this way, they simply find a Chinese character which sounds like the first bit of the English name and add "guo" which means nation. For example, Chinese for UK is 英国 （ pronounced as "in guo" , the first character "英” sounds like "En" for "England" ( That's why when some Chinese kids are studying geography they don't get it right, because sometimes they think UK = England, which is not true.)
Exactly! I am puzzled whenever I see people interpreting 美國 as "beautiful country"...
@@xuepenggao1301 Of course, but they generally choose such syllables which are vaguely positive or at least neutral. E.g., "Ying" could be shadow, baby, husk etc., but they went for "hero".
Wrong, 美國 is actually a short form of 美利堅合眾國 (United States of America). It's literally written in Wikipedia, anyone can check that out.
I am so glad I found your channel. Like honestly this is amazing, you have managed to interest me in something my teachers never could.
Dear Mr. Ryan Chapman,
I want all viewers to know I find Ryan's videos to be very accurate and inciteful easy viewing. Although he may lack actual experience in China with real life Confucian upbringing, he clearly made it up by reading many impartial books and documentaries. I am a 64 years old, 4th generation Singaporean living in Malaysia who is totally English educated, but brought up in a confucian and taoism background.
i find his views refreshing, fair and rather accurate depiction between China and US. I do recommend American's and Chinese to follow your channel.
And of course insightful rather than inciteful.
@Joe Roscoe We tag team it.
Joe and Kay missed your point ...
@@Malephex Nothing was missed, champ.
both joe and kayatechef are right. : insightful instead of inciteful. "made up for it" (or 'makes up for it') instead of "made it up" I agree with Mr. KokhinLim's opinion.
I have to thank you for, what seems to me, a wonderfully researched and balanced video.
Trying to explain a topic of such immense complexity in such a short time is a feat in itself but having explained the concepts with so many illustrative and comprehensible manner is incredible. I have nothing but praise.
Just a thought that I had. I seems to me that America is still being propelled by the enlightenment spirit of linear rationality. This may not be surprising as the country was founded on enlightenment ideals through the writings of Montesquieu, Locke and the founding fathers. (I am personally very drawn to the enlightenment ideal, it's very attractive and holy.)
But the post-enlightenment thinking appears to have taken a turn, with romanticism and the Hegelian dialectic, seemingly sidelining strict rationality or logic as being subjected to the process of time and rendered insignifican. (This might be a vast generalisation and an unsophisticated manner of describing Hegal thought) Conincidentally, traditional Chinese thought had never had such strong emphasis on logic and strict rationality but rather on motion or movement. (perhaps analogous to Heraclitus, to a certain extent) So it would seem that Chinese political thinking coheres to a certain extent with post-enlightenment view.
I would also say that the doctrinal basis of the US being rooted in enlightenment might face more challenges moving forward. (This is not to say China doesn't have significant issues, I do think the inconsistancy is much more severe under the Chinese system)
Apologise for the long comment. A very rough and loose record of my thoughts whilst watching the video. No doubt very underdeveloped and problematic. I thank you again for your work in the video.
A very insightful and humble post!
Here is the 50 cent army ranking you for your propaganda. Lol
@@felpswa123 thank you for your kind words!
@@depreciatingasset I must have not understood what you mean. Are you saying that my post is 50 cent army post?
What makes you say so? Which part of my comment strikes you as such? I would be delighted to know! Thanks!
@@MEGALEHANE I don't think it's balanced or thoughtful. Trying to frame the conversation as cultural differences is misdirection and subversion. I detailed why in a separate comment. Two major points is that first those same Chinese with the same culture seek the western countries but the opposite is not true. Second point, is that in the liberal democracies, you can be Chinese with lateral thinking and all cultural aspects and if you succeed, you'll become the dominant way of thinking and everybody will incorporate your ideas. Also the US or western liberalism isn't a judeochristian thinking. A judeochristian thinking with its ideal the abrahamic God is very much a feudal despotic Roman/ Egyptian/Mesopotamia version. The puritans, catholics evangelicals are example of Christian thinking. Western liberal democracy is a revolution on chrsitianity.
So basically any framing of the China affair as a cultural difference is falling for CCP lines which are just another despotic tyranny regime with Chinese characteristics, much like Iran is tyranny with Islamic characteristics, Venezuela is tyranny with communist or militaristic characteristics.
I think k the CCP is using Sun Tzu on the free world. Trying to fight and win with all other methods than conflict. But we are in a war
I’ve always been interested in other cultures and this was excellent and informative. I’m not good at articulating others content but I enjoy watching your videos. You’re calm and concise
Thankyou for such a well thought out presentation. I'm from England and my wife is Chinese. I travelled around China for 2 months last year and found the culture and history very interesting. Achieving a middle ground between socialism and capitalism is probably the best of both worlds. Respecting each other's cultures is also very important.
i’m an american undergraduate student studying political science, with a particular concentration on national security. after learning about clausewitz and sun tzu, about disputes in the south china sea and re-engineering the supply chain, about the strategies of biden versus xi- i have not seen a more important video than this one here. u present such critical and messy information so clearly and with nuance, while making it accessible and engaging. i still have a lot to learn, but i’m grateful to say that i wish i watched this video sooner, i’m glad i watched it now, and i can’t wait to watch it again and connect it to what i’ll continue to learn. thank you ryan!!!
i'm a Chinese in Beijing. and has been a designer for years. YUP. generally speaking, the West still don't understand China well. in short China is not communist country like USSR. China is a combination of socialism and captilism right now. basically Chinese governments have found a new way to run a country. in very short is: first the top leader Should has great experience to manager from the poorest village to biggest province,
which is completely different from the democracy world.
And the second difference is China would test a new policy in a city. if it works. spread to entire country.
so when it test in a city. you can understand it is definitely a democracal policy. when it spread to entire country is kind of like an authority.
Your education isn't working if you think this video is even remotely informative
@@albiewitz2686 I beg to differ. It's quality work with no bias. Certainly better than either western or Chinese media.
That entire sectionon Marxism/the CPC (whose initialism this guy couldn't even spell correctly, proving his incompetence when it comes to discussing the subject) is just vapid nonsense. It's clear this guy never read any socialist theory in his life and never bothered researching the basics of Chinese politics.
He missed the main point. Chinese people are no different than europeans or americans. The problem is they're exposed to only one political enviroment which warps their minds into a lateral way of thinking. China is doomed to fail unless rule of law and democracy is achieved.
As a Chinese, living in US for many years, I have to say that this is the best video I have ever seen comparing the culture between Chinese and western
not true lol
@@maimunkatabg The comment states, "-the best video I have ever seen-". If you don't know all the video's they have watched then you are incapable of determining the statements accuracy.
@@chronicle8080 Nobody asked.
@@rip_conf6186 Neither did I for yours, see how stupid and endless your response is. He said something dumb so I pointed it out pretty respectfully.
definitely, as a Chinese still in China, agree.
This video is very meaningful, thank you for uploading. The discussions in the comment section are friendly and interesting. I love it so much.
Please never stop with your talks, they're excellent. Thank you
As you asked, I will leave a comment regarding this video though I usually don’t, as you surmised.
First, you excel at presenting your content is easily comprehensible chunks that allow the listener or viewer to digest fully and thus get the most out of it. Your clear and unbiased explanations also leave your audience able to appreciate the content without needing to do extra mental gymnastics in order to glean out the wheat from the chaff. Your examples are excellently chosen and illuminate your points in just the right light for more clarity and comprehension.
Second, I have a better understanding of China’s political thinking style, as well as American now than I did before watching this video so if your intention was to better educate your audience, you have succeeded. My main take-away is the linear thinking style of American political thinking vs. the lateral style of the Chinese, though as you pointed out, there is in reality no absolute one way of thinking on one side or the other but more of a propensity to favor one style over the other.
I guess another big take-away is that the Chinese see their rightful place on the world stage as a leader and a dominant power, if not the dominant power to be respected and acknowledged as such. And given their immensely long history as being such a power, it is understandable why they would think so. Given their decades long efforts to modernize their economy, civilian infrastructure, industrial capacity, and military infrastructure, it is foreseeable that they will achieve their long term goal to regain their former might and status as a central power in the world. I suppose the real question here is whether Americans will come to see this transformation as inevitable and thus not try to thwart it out of spite or out of fear of having to accept that their dominance is only temporary and perhaps short-lived, given the much grander scale of history that we are actually concerned with in looking at the big picture, or whether American stubbornness and sense of exceptionalism will lead to a direct conflict with China in which it will likely be that the American side will be the aggressors and the Chinese the defenders, as you pointed out at the end of this excellent video, is the historical stance in most of China’s experiences with war.
I’m a big fan of all of your videos so far; even though you have your own opinions, you clearly make every effort to summarize your topics even-handedly. I’m excited to see where this China series takes us!
Thank you Mr Chapman,
I especially enjoyed your definition of fascism inclusive to the various references. Before your lesson, I never grasped the machination behind the rise of Mussolini and Hitler. I had wrongfully assumed that nationalism and ethnicity were random tools which arose from the turmoil of the times.
This is likely the best video out there on this topic, and I love all of your videos. Please keep making them.
Brilliant. My wife is Chinese and I have visited China many times. You have captured impressions that I gained through experience whilst furnishing these with many quotations I was not aware of. One view I have formed is of the Utilitarian strands of Confucianism. This might be a bridge to some western concepts. I would say western utilitarianism might seek the happiness of the many, possibly at the cost of the few but in China the individual is not central to thinking as seen by the west. The common good is seen in collective terms. In this way they have found a different take on the collectivism of Marxism. We might be shocked to think that people may suffer to allow the system to maintain order but often in China such matters are dismissed as not of great importance. For them it is like teasing a tiger - you can expect to get hurt. So much for the underdog! The military aspects of what you say have often been explained to my by Chinese people I have met. It is however worth considering Face Culture which is perhaps not so far from Honour culture. They are proud and they expect to be respected. I am not defending China. What I say is simply how it appears to me.
Ryan, this was a real good, unbiased, examination and comparison of two conflicting political philosophy without saying one is more correct than the other. i really liked your analogy between chess and gungho when comparing lateral and linear thinking. amazing video!!
Ryan, your analytical ability to explain incredibly complex topics is just amazing. I've watched most of your channel and it has helped me understand and put in context our complicated modern world. Thank you for your effort and willingness to research and communicate your points of view.
Excellent, excellent videos. Can’t believe I just found your channel. Writing this comment simply to support you as your video quality is incredible, clear, succinct, and to the point. Thank you
Wow this is nice video. This pretty much summarized Chinese people’s mind set(I can say that because I’m Chinese lol). I’d like to add one note to the Chinese name for America. It’s called mei guo probably because most of Chinese names for countries are transliteration, so the Mei is likely coming from pronunciation of aMERica. Same goes to France(fa guo), Deutschland(de guo)
That entire sectionon Marxism/the CPC (whose initialism this guy couldn't even spell correctly, proving his incompetence when it comes to discussing the subject) is just vapid nonsense. It's clear this guy never read any socialist theory in his life and never bothered researching the basics of Chinese politics.
A combination of both transliteration and free translation. Country of beauty, country of law, and country of morale respectively.
Well, there are many Chinese words that are pronounce as ‘mei’(around 80 of them), but the word 美’mei’, which means ‘beautiful’ was chosen. Similarly there there are many words that are pronounce as “Fa”, but the word 法“fa” that represent “law” wa s chosen.
Go as a game I felt shaped my thinking a lot. I think the "elliptic thinking" could benefit everyone. It's really fascinating when you win games by basically yielding every fight, giving your opponent all they ask for, and have them resign after they realize, they were asking for wrong things all along. It's such a weird dynamic and I can only imagine what impact such game would have on a culture after centuries.
strategies of GO since the Tang dynasty is interesting to see:
一．不得贪胜：
其意是说赢一目也是赢，赢百目也是赢，所以不要因局势大好，而让对手有机可乘，应稳中求胜、步步为营。
二．入界宜缓：
其意是说进入到别人的模样或势力时，一定要缓缓而行、不可躁进，以免被对手一网打尽。
三．攻彼顾我：
其意是说在破坏或攻击敌人的阵地或棋形时，也要顾虑到自己棋子的安全。
四．弃子争先：
其意是说在行棋时，舍弃眼前才几目的棋子，而先使去下更大的棋或围更大的地。
五．舍小就大：
此句意跟上句类似，其意是说在下棋时，先下价值大的地方，不要将棋下在小处，围棋的胜败是以地的大小来判，所以当然要从大的先著手。
六．逢危须弃：
其意是说如计算到有无法挽救的棋时，就应当机立断不要再浪费棋子去救。
七．慎勿轻速：
其意是说下棋应谨慎小心、不要轻率而行。
八．动须相应：
其意是说在与对手交战时，其落子要前后相互呼应，随时要注意对手所下的棋来判断如何应手，以免到头来造成不可挽救的局势。
九．彼强自保：
其意是说当与对手交战时，敌强我弱，此时做活为首要目标，不要再有想著要去杀对方的棋、破坏别人的地盘。
十．势孤取和：
其意是说当局势周围不利时，或是我方少数棋子的在敌方的势力中，行棋应要和平相处，莫要与对手挑起战端互相厮杀。
Not bad for an American who's never been to China. I'm American and I've lived in China for the past 6 years and I still learned something. I also appreciate your disclaimers. It's true, if you want to tell the whole story about both sides you would need an entire archieve not just a book haha.
Here's your 酱油， sir🤣😆
This kind of video can only fool children under the age of 20. He doesn't even know anything about China,🤣
@@0.0LEE-n8i gotta give him some credit for his genuine attempt, but i agree he's too entrenched with american propaganda
@@alldaydreamaboutfuckis there anything wrong with the video
@@alldaydreamaboutfuckMerely a propaganda. Starting from the 5th minute, I held out on until that - in contrast, in the US the law is above all - and turned it off.
Ryan, I only came upon your channel recently and it already became my favorite content on youtube. You really have a deep and balanced understanding of all the topic matters, and you explain in a clear manner. Well-done, please keep it up. I will support it going forward.
Hi there. I’m glad you Americans finally get to know a little bit about China since we Chinese have taken quite a lot to learn from America 40 years ago.
I have been to America since 2005 for the first time and then several times after that.
I read tons of books and videos about America and write down almost a book about what I think America is.
So I just want to say hello and try to know you individual.
I am amazed that youtube recommended me what appears to be such an impressive level of insight and elegant craft of respectful yet concise knowledge. Will be looking forward to learn something more from your channel!
The linear and lateral thinking has been the most difficult thing trying to explain to my mates when discussing chinas philosophy. Very well done to you sir.
My brain had a hard time following too. I don't blame them.
"lateral" being a euphemism for not namedropping Dialectics or analysis.
Lateral thinking is just critical thinking. Linear thinking is indoctrination
@@albiewitz2686 Perhaps it has something to do with Taoism? Ever heard of the book Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu?
@@mottahead6464 I have my copy on my bookshelf yes
The Chinese language itself lends to lateral thinking. Is the doctor in question a man or a woman? Depends on context, and most of the time, that doesn't even matter. What about terms like mother and father? Yes, they are gendered even in Chinese, but there's technically nothing stopping a man being called mother because of how the language works.
Thank you for your videos from which I learn a lot. It seems to me that you are always trying to explain things objectively and not according to your possible position, which is formidable, thank you again
Please keep doing what you do, Ryan. Your sober analysis of typically contentious topics is so refreshing.
I am amazed someone who doesn't speak Chinese and has never been to China can give such an accurate characterization of Sino-US differences. Every view point in this video is correct! There are millions of westerners living in China and millions of Chinese diaspora in the US. A lot of people have spoken foreign language for decades without truly understanding a different culture and form correct opinions. I wonder what you could do once you have mastered Chinese language.
I just want to say I appreciate the editing on your videos. I love that you display the cover art of the books you highlight in the bottom corner, makes it easy to snap a screenshot for reference later as needed.
Looking forward to seeing you delve into the topic further, given the nature of these politically tense and confusing times!
Your points are great from a native Chinese's view. They are especially crucial in today's tension between China and the US. We are super needed to understand others thoroughly to avoid humanitarian disasters.
What a delightful take on various subjects without obvious bias. I look forward to viewing all of your videos.
This channel is invaluable - well-researched, concise modules presented in the style of classical education (no overarching political agenda). I recommend you and share with many friends. I'm old and on a fixed income or I would certainly support you financially. I support you in every way I can. Keep 'em coming!!
As a Chinese, I really appreciate your work and got impressed by your understanding on China and Chinese mentality. It’s surprisingly accurate, even though there’s a lot inferring based on literal resource due to lack of actual experience living in China. I am one of those who don’t usually leave comments. But I just wanna leave this to tell you that this video is very helpful for me to explain Chinese cultural mentality to westerners. Thank you very much for the effort on learning all this.
Agreed this is a great representation of the differences between east and west.
Is youtube available in china? Or are you on a foreign IP address
@@bestestAIsongs no its not, UA-cam is still banned in china. People who want to use UA-cam in china have to change their IP address
@@raynboren6885 sad.
@@bestestAIsongs But there are more and more people in China who using VPN to watch UA-cam. If they do not spread the content which is sensitive，the government just don't mind that.
This channel is one of the best finds of the week.
My placeholder comment! Keep up the good work!
Very much appreciating your content Ryan. Incredibly informative and thought provoking. Looking forward to more to come!
I never expected the contents to be so balanced and insightful particularly putting Dr. Kissinger’s observations of Mao comparing to Socrates. So building on that statement, I would argue Go is multiple dimensional with much more probability of outcomes than that of chess. Socialism/Communism/Capitalism are gross generalization of social and political structure. As of now, the goal for China government and people are fully aligned and that is to achieve co-prosperity and reach another level of human civilization (星辰大海）by collaboration and eradication of zero sum game mentality.
That was excellent, thank you for putting it together.
You wanna know if you found a good person making video essays about controversial/divisive topics?
they put in disclaimers, they tell you flaws, they tell you to take things with a grain of salt.
they are intellectually honest, like this guy.
He is very very honest. I really like him too. He clearly has that journalistic integrity thing that the media currently lacks.
Absolutely. Fortunately/Unfortunately for those who took the effort to understand war, money & reality from works like Sun Wu's Art of War, Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations & Carl Sagan's Vision of Humanity, s/he/they will realise there exist many who will seek profits/opportunities from this crisis. This may explain why many elites/experts from states like US, China, EU, India, UK, Russia, AU, Brazil, etc. groups like IMF, WHO, UNP, RSF, ICC, WFP, TSB, POG, etc. & firms like Apple, Tencent, Samsung, Nestle, Loreal, Tata, Sony, Siemens, etc. are already making their moves in the cyber/shadow space.
found your stuff the other day and wow I feel like I've gained so much insight in a short time, its really shown me how much I don't know about some very complicated but incredibly interesting stuff.
Just discovered Ryan Chapman and I thoroughly enjoy both his content and his delivery style. His attempt to be objective and open minded is a killer method for those of us who long to avoid the slanted agendas being broadcasted today. Awesome job Ryan!
I rarely interact with videos, but this was such great content that I felt the need to pay tribute. Thanks so much!
In the past 2 days, I have watched more than 10 of your videos, including the longer one.
I just want to appreciate you and your efforts in preparing these excellent resources.
Thank you, Ryan.
I grew up in the southern US where the idea of China invading the US is treated somewhat like an inevitability, not that it’s imminent, but everyone has the idea in the back of their heads. Phrases people like to say, like “we’ll all be speaking Chinese one day”, family members giving ominous warnings to my sisters for listening to C-Pop music, things like that. So the last segment on war, I found very interesting of course but also comforting. I guess it goes to show how if you grow up in a historically militaristic country, that’s exactly what you’d be afraid of other countries doing to you.
It was the exact projection mindset of the civil war. They feared freed slaves would retaliate for their racism and mistreatment.
exactly
Isn’t almost every country historically militaristic tho?
lol, China invade US, you poor guys got brainwashed by the US regime propaganda so hard. Supressed by the police and has no human rights. Know nothing about the truth outside in the real world.
@@cpt.yoinks5981 Nah, the US is ongoing militaristic.
As a Chinese person, I really appreciate how you showed tremendous respect for Chinese political philosophy because this philosophy not only determines the functioning of government but also impacts the cultural identity of ordinary Chinese people like me. I think the Chinese political system can benefit from more linear thinking so that the law becomes more inflexible and less subject to the government's interpretation of it.
The "linear thinking" sounds like no-doubt thinking to me, where's your critical thinking, that you might admire and promote I guess. Hah. don't you feel that the "lateral thinking" might actually be the logic one?
@@russianfund Lateral thinking is intuitive, non-axiomatic, and prone to circularities. In a very real way, it is entirely void of logic, at least in any philosophical sense of the word.
There's an important difference between "good thinking tool" and "good logical foundation". My synthesis of the two says that you should "scout" laterally, and then verify vertically.
So no, I don't think lateral thinking is "more" logical. In fact, I'd go further to say it is dangerous to confuse it as logic at all. But something doesn't have to be logical (ie deductive, inductive, or abducive) to be useful. Maybe you could even say "transductive" for lateral thinking, but that's actually a well-defined thing, and lateral thinking still isn't logical. It's analogical.
@@MrRedstonefreedom I agree that lateral thinking is Not "more" logical. Because the concept of logic itself is linear as how a computer chip was built these days with silicon binary gates which are predictable and certain in form of Yes(1)/NO(0). Lateral thinking believes in real world the situations are more complex than that and involve more parameters. Even that will change over time and progression. This resembles what we see in Quantum mechanics that we need to factor in more such as time, probabilities, uncertainties and even our own observations etc. Just like the universe won't simply itself for us. It is what it is. It's up to us to change perspective and shift paradigm to understand/adapt to it better.
Yes. Indeed. But i was actually hoping for dinner Eastern philosophy.
That's not what this video offers. I feel like I've been intellectually click baited
@@MrRedstonefreedom No, I don't need to scout anything, you believe in whatever you way like, help yourself. I don't choose way of thinking, In my linear thinking, democracy is good, but your definition of democracy may not be universally good, so you try to spreed your "democracy" could be not as good as you think. So I think the author's is confusing and not logic.
I was just discussing with my wife how we were unsure how the two different nations operated in terms of politics. I really enjoy your videos! They're always so informative, and while I can definitely sense some personal opinion in your content, they do a great job of not applying judgement to the topics and allowing room for consideration of new ideas. Thank you for all the work you put into your videos!
All-powerful UA-cam algorithm, recommend this man's video! It's great. 😜
Good work and thanks, Ryan. Can't wait for more content on China!
Only seen a few videos, but they are extremely well researched and I think you do an excellent job at taking as objective of a look into these topics as possible. Ill definitely be looking into more of your content.
I am currently studying International Relations with a focus on Foreign Policy and Security Studies in the region of Asia so when I got this video in my recommended I was super interested. This is my first video by you Ryan and I am blown away. This was amazing, and I am definitely coming back for more! Keep up the good work!
Truly an excellent and well done video on the subject which is inspired on . My applausse for all the work behind this masterpiece ¡
I'm taking an upper level class on East Asian politics in college this semester, and watching stuff like this in advance is making me feel a lot better about it. Thanks for the awesome video!
This video is full of crap and if your education in anyway resembles this then your program is also propagandized
As a Chinese national, I have to say that I'm impressed by your effort trying to understand the different mentality of not just the Chinese politics, but the Chinese culture in general, instead of simply generalizing the US and China into 'democratic' or 'authoritarian', 'us' or 'them', 'good' or 'evil'. The two types of mentalities are just different, and we approach problems and have them solved differently, as you've mentioned. And if all the politicians on both sides make more effort to understand each other's positions and to find common ground, there will be much less animosity and antagonism, and the world would be a much better place than it is today. I seriously appreciate your effort.
Hear, hear
One thing China does that the USA doesn't...... China punishes their elites. In the USA you can attempt to overthrow the government, but if you are a connected elite like Trump and his gang you just get a slap on the wrist and can run for president again.
/boggle
The elites in the USA live by their own set of rules. And none of their rules come with harsh punishment. But it's been going on for a long time and Trump is the culmination of not punishing those in power. Eventually someone comes along that will ruin everything.
It's always a good idea to understand the opponent, but not necessary, or even good, to find common ground. After all, knowing your enemy is half the battle.
I agree but only if you consider the other side an adversary. Chinese people didn't view the US as an adversary until the Trump administration. We viewed the US as a trading partner. But all of a sudden the US started to feel the threat that China may create to its global hegemony (though most Chinese people don't even consider ourselves to have that capacity), and it started to derogate and villify everything China does. We didn't want to be an enemy, but when the other side said to the whole world that 'this is our public enemy here', what else can you do?
@@WChocoleta I meant it in general sense, not in this specific case. Have you seen the political tribalism within the US.
This was very informative and I look forward to the rest of the series!