Blueprint makes a 632 with a warranty that crushes the GM on price. At current market value its 15.5k for a fully dressed ready to run 632 that will run on pump gas. There is nothing that will remotely come close to that value in a crate. There are tests of that specific motor making 850 out of the box and has survived dyno pulls north of 2k with 22-24psi of boost.
I had a ZZ572 in my Chevelle...I was terrified, my passengers were terrified, motorists around me we terrified. It was the greatest car I will ever drive...I can't imagine the 632 but I am sure it is amazing
Its not so crazy when we convert the ci to cc to litres, which in litres this crate engine is a 10.4, so no, not so impressive. It takes more litres to make the desired HP. Valkyrie is a 6.5 making 1000 HP, all motor.
@@retoadyt3196 but the Valkyrie makes 330ftlbs less torque due to that lower displacement, Maybe read up a bit on the differences and then come back. Horsepower is just revs, the Valkyrie needs 7 speeds, This crate motor would do fine with 4.
@@retoadyt3196 Chevy's widely available retail unit engine vs multi million dollar car thats already sold out. Heck F1 cars make more hp than Valkyrie.
@@user-nifinei34jd9 Both engines are completely different to each other, read up about them and you'll see what the differences are. A properly designed engine (Valkyrie) can produce much more power with less displacement needed than a poorly designed engine (ZZ632). Crate engines need to come into the 21st century already.
agreed, say what you will about their interior quality but when it comes to motor or chassis development gm works hard to keep exotic manufacturers up at night (see C5/6/7r race cars, alpha platform camaros, ls7, lt6 ect)
Even chrysler and ford can pump out some gems too the ford gt and the viper acr are some top notch vehicles. American manufacturers really get too much hate for not being good
@@MrDwightsimon damn if only you could dislike comments on youtube you'd realize that you are clearly and flat out wrong and this comes from a Nissan fan boy
@@davelowetsI needed this in my 88 Cheyenne. Had plenty of room for it. With 261 gears in the rear end too. Could finally reach it's top speed of blowing the tires out
@@vladimirzakrevski3157 well, you just proved that my point 4 is valid. That engine has low migrange torgue for its size. Midrange torque where most driving is one. A smaller, lighter engine turbocharged will give much better midrange torque. Installing this heavy engine will transform your cars handling to be a total pig. Fuel consumption at light throttle will be very bad also. I have a 800hp FG Falcon daily, that could be 1200hp just with stronger rods. There is no way I would install this ancient 60s tech pos engine. It has to be massive to make power, because it is so ancient and inefficient. All modern engines are 4v dohc vvt, and most 2021 engines are also turbo.
@@nordic5490 Stop making up bullshit, this engine makes over 600 foot pounds at only 3000 RPM with ZERO turbo lag. The lightweight aluminum heads also mean installing it in a car that came with any other big block Chevy would improve the handling not impede it.
12.1 compression so way too high to boost and besides an 8-71 is way too small for a 632. With a forged bottom end, that compression, and cam it would love nitrous. Not a 500 shot because I don't think you would want to spray 50% of the engine's power built like this in nitrous alone. 200 or 300hp in a couple stages or ramped in progressively sure.
You’d be surprised what a difference high octane pump gas can do for your engine. I had a suped up 71 SS and all I had to do to beat everything else on the road was to fill it half full of Ethel or Supreme and top it off with aviation fuel at our local small airport. I’ve even used a mothball before because they used to be made out of solid methanol. 50/50 Ethel and AVgas and hang on for dear life. Seriously it would be the difference of only burning out in 1st and 2nd to all four gears
I think that there should be more crate engines from manufacturers. Imagine an engine from Germany, England or Italy. Or a small displacement 150-300hp from Japan. Even if an existing design is produced for the next 10 years. I think it would be better than killing the ICE for good.
@@kettujabamiesukkeliukko so jp perfomance bought a new 2jz for their supra but i dont know if you just call toyota for that or if its a replacement part and you have to be a shop to get or what 🤷🏼♂️
I mean.. Toyota does sell the G16 3cyl engine from the GR Yaris as a crate engine in Japan. The engine is producing 257-272 with stock turbo, but capable of handling up to 475hp with bigger turbos & fuel injectors while maintaining stock internals. One guy even put it in an AE86 a while back.
Chevy was just getting Ford back for the Bronco v Blazer thing, lol. And Dodge has always been ahead of the game. Jeep has never gone away, even a Renegade will do something off road if modified.
@@captainawesome7092 maybe dodge is killing it in sales but when it comes to who's ahead of the game it's Chevy and haltech but even those guys are at the standard for performance production and modded cars
9:48 Get a classic mom minivan, and make it mid-engined, and put the monster in there. Don’t forget to get a 4/AWD. Also get a good muffler that lets you sleep/stealth mode, so you can get the most out of the sleeper mom van. Edit: also, twin-charge it.
The original big block Mark II "Mystery engine" had symmetrical ports, which GM decided were too expensive to mass produce so the Mark IV had the short and long intake ports. Decades later GM finally produced a symmetrical port big block engine which was what chief engineer Dick Keinath wanted from the beginning. Sadly, he didn't live long enough to see it happen as he died in 2010.
Jeremiah: "Why is more horsepower better? Today, we put this crate engine in Catfish to find out!" Oh, we see where this is going....and so does your boss!
Sounds like a conversation I had with a guy about his pick up. "I gotta ask, what size engine is that?" "A 351 M." "No liters, just cubic inches." "Yep." But ya see, as soon as I heard "351" I knew instantly what we were talking about. I was able to convert to liters mentally, but I'm damn near 60, so my "baby boomer" brain still measures in cubic inches.
I built a 502 cid Boss Hoss bike in 2002. It was fast and heavy but no handling. The engine was $7250 from Lubbock's Scoggin-Dickey Chevy Dealership. Ran hot in the summer but nice on a cool day. About 550 horsepower. The NESCO transmission gave out after 4 years of normal riding. A 632 cid would be nice in my 454SS truck.
Conversation in Cheavy office: -"Hey, let's do a pinnicle of modern engineering." ---"So forced induction?" -"No. Huuge displacement." ---"Extremely efficient heads. and high rew limit?" -"No. Pushrods and some huuge valves." ---"Hi flow fuel injection?" -"No." ---"So we make an engine that can idle 24/7 for a decade but for a racecar." -"Ok, you can have fuel injection."
1 There is nothing modern about forced induction, mercedes has been factory supercharging cars since the 1920s. 2 The heads actually are extremely efficient which is why the thing is making over 1K at only 6600 RPM. Just one of those aluminum heads cost more than most people pay for a whole used car. 3 More power from lower revs is always more efficient than a stressful delayed high RPM peak. 4 The thing would run even better with a carburetor as proven by Engine Masters carb vs efi dyno shootout.
@@Impactjunky This tech have been used even longer than merc has superchargerd their engines. So this is more like how can we make the most low tech engine using best manufacturing technics in use today. Figures speak for them selves. Less than 100 bhp/per liter just screams a question of how much does it make when supercharged. And that's probably what happens for the most of these engines anyway. And two valves per cylinder aren't that much of a restriction with forced induction. My very very important and appreciated opinion here: Ford 1liter three cylinder turbo engine is more of an pinnicle of modern engineering than this. It actually makes that 100bhp/liter. Ten of those even weight less than 632. This is just "Let's take a truck engine and see how much can we cuddle out of it. By supersizeing it.". Now I'm not saying this isn't impressive. But this sure is not the best Cheavy can do with an engineer or two.
@@damniambad Nope, the big block Chevy hit the market in 58, long after the first supercharged cars of the 20's. There is almost nothing modern about the manufacture or design of this ZZ632 either. High flow aluminum heads were available in the 60's and people have been home building 632 Chevy's with and without aluminum heads and fuel injection for decades. Comparing the power per liter of a forced induction motor to a NA motor is like comparing apples to oranges so your comparison with that weak little three cylinder makes no sense. Also the word is pinnacle not pinnicle.
@@Impactjunky Oh you are right! It is spelled pinnacle. Other wise we can of course make whole new segment for zz632 so it can actually be good at something else than being big. Like the most american thing ever -segment. Or just best v8. Of this year. Made in america. And Is over 6,2 liters but under 12. And makes lot of noise. But not compared to displacement, cause its just too big for that. Any Ferrari NA engine is just way better in any way but the cost and there are lots of better oil burnes on the engine market that make torgue lower down and actually make some sense in a truck.
I take it you're not talking about a GR Yaris? So that is like saying "hahaha my car engine is bigger and has more power, then my sister's moped." And even if it was a GR Yaris last time I checked it was a 3 banger, which kinda says a lot. Not to mention the 2JZ GET which is a straight 6 that can put out about 2,000+ hp. 1,000 hp sounds like a good platform. But it depends if they mean 1,000 potential hp, or 1,000 hp out of the crate? If it is out of the crate then yes it is a really good base to start from. If not then you still need a lot of work to do and it doesn't seem as great anymore.
@@amehayami934 Yes the 2JZ-GTE is an impressive engine, but remember its turbocharged, how much power do you thing this engine could make if it had a turbo too? ;)
@@amehayami934 comparing FI is kinda apples and oranges but if you know the peak boost you can make a more apples to apples comparison. Every 14.7psi of boost is equivalent to 1bar of boost which is also equivalent to 1 atmosphere. So a 5litre engine @1bar of boost has the same displacement as a 10L engine
Inline 6 engines are good. But 2,000 HP will not stay together. Even if it did for a short time. You would have more money in it than LS with a turbo. More power and torque, stronger and less money!!!
@@lorddoobsworth144 It might not be able to handle much if any boost. They made all internals as light as possible to get to 6600rpm. So if you wanted to add boost, you would probably need chonkier internals and lower the max rpm.
when it comes to crate engines (, I would suggest removing the oil pan and valve cover just to check it out (lube the springs and valves ) and pre oil the motor via the distributor if it has one or crank it over with no spark or fuel until you get oil pressure ,if you have roller lifters break in is no big deal
In marine applications big blocks are still common including more then one the 454 is still in thousands of boats. As gm makes many of murcrusers engines from 4cylinder to big bad v8s. And there are some nasty race motors
Considering the time and expense involved in modifying an existing engine to put out this sort of power, that price, while more than my entire car was new, that pricing really isn't all that ridiculous.
@@justanotherdmax just guessing but I believe he meant the 8.1 was the last factory engine of 454 architecture. Also, small correction, the 8.1 was 496cid.
Us old folks remember when 'Mountain Motors' where a thing. 700+ CI's of insane power for drag cars. chevy just finally decided to market one. It'll be interesting to see how they start showing up in, and how well they actually run.
This would be an awesome upgrade to a Chevette. Hard to see how a 200hp electric motor, without controllers, batteries etc available too, is a runner up to this engine.
You should keep it classic/classy put it in a chevy nova II Great aftermarket support and guys have been putting big blocks in them for years. The weight to power ratio would be off the charts.
Well, I once saw a 87 Fiero that someone somehow shoehorned a Mk VI 502 crate motor into, complete with Hilborn style injector stacks. There's a pretty good project idea for Zach.
the long runners on the intake remind me of the 351 SVO crate engine. The 632 has even more air volume displaced so it sucks even harder to pack the intake charge with a hearty pulse.
632ci equates ti 10.356 liters, and manufacturers always round up, so they’d likely advertise as a 10.4L. Just like Ford’s Coyote engine actually has a displacement of 4.951 or something like that, so they round up to 5.0 and not 4.9. Small correction is all.
A hilarious use of that engine would be to throw it in the back of a compact like a chevy spark and turn it into a rear engine fwd car. would take excessive amounts of modification and would probably tear itself apart but would be great to see.
Here's two ideas for that motor: Easy: Make a new version of Stubby Bob. Instant cLiCkBaIt, or whatever. Hard: Make a Chevrolet version of the Dodge Tomahawk.
on youtube there's a old power block TV show uploaded that they took a old body style like the mid 90a ss454 truck, and made it awd with newer tahoe parts. they did a cheap ls swap, but this engine in the 2 door /blazer/Tahoe of the same Gen would be a full sized typhoon with the newer awd would be cool.
P l e a s e do an International Scout II! It would be an amazing build. Has lots of space, heritage and going up in value! Would be cool to see something different
Minor gripe: big block did not go back to the 50s. I have the original Hot Rod magazine from 1965 debuting the "Mark IV mystery motor" which was the 396 in the passanger cars and the 427 in Nascar. Junior Johnson made the mystery motor famous in Nascar. The "W" engine 409 was developed in 61-62.
This thing would be perfect for a Chevrolet Cheyenne series pickup restomod! I can only imagine dropping one in a 1989 GMC 3/4 ton single cab longbed 4x4 and using it as mountain tow rig.
I'd love to see one in a 93-95 Park Avenue, the engine bay is already huge and the chassis and suspension would be easier to reinforce compared to a more modern car
The ZZ632 has a factory warranty. The horsepower numbers are made with pump gas. GM may do a bit of testing and see what E85 fuel can make, I'm guessing in the 1200 HP range.
You been smoking dope, those cars are ugly af and bout every part and piece was junk have to put a tube frame/roll cage just so the thing doesnt shear apart
I would love to see you put one of these into a Factory Five 818. It's a tube chassis, mid-engine kit car intended to be built from a donor Subaru Impreza or WRX that was designed to weigh 818kg (1800lbs). I don't know if it would fit, or if the Subaru transaxle could handle the power, but a 1000hp, 1800lbs, mid-engine, RWD track day car would be pretty awesome to see. Or you could be a bit more boring and put it into a Factory Five GTM Supercar, which is also mid-engine but was designed to be built from a Corvette donor with a Porsche transaxle.
It would be far too heavy for track use, you'd be better off going with a much smaller turbocharged Japanese engine like a 4G63, RB26 or 1/2JZ. Or, actually, an STi motor like they suggest would be a pretty good call.
It can if you brave enough, but it won't be competitive at all nor easy to drive That thing really shine with lighter motor. You know, gokart feel instead of death wish feel when you step on the gas deeper
For reference, my Blacktop BEAMS 3S-GE came from the factory with 200hp at the flywheel. It's a 2 liter, so that's like 5 of my engines both in displacement and power output. And reliably too. 🤯 Damn!
I'd opt for a '71-75 Coupe DeVille. They came with a 500ci (8.2l?) V-8 so I'd guess this crate engine would fit, and you have lots of room for a bigger transmission, diff, bracing, etc. etc. to take the power.
Correction. Only eldorados came with the 500 engine. DeVille's in those years came with the 472. But yes. There would be plenty of room for the 632 in the engine bay. I know because I have an all original 1971 coupe DeVille in my garage.
Hemishperical Cylinder Heads are better than the regular Penthouse Cylinder Heads you see in today's cars when it comes to making power, the only reason why you don't see them in the road today are the slight weight increase and emissions, both are not something a top fuel dragster would care about.
2 reasons: 1. Marketing - the target market expects this ancient 60s tech, and, 2. Limit top speed - the NHRA wants to keep the top speed down. Many tracks do not have the runoff room for higher speeds. A 4v dohc engine will make more power for the same combustion pressures. A turbo engine will make more power. 20-25% of top fuel engines power is used up driving the supercharger.
@@nordic5490 1.) Not really, the reason why the NHRA always used 60s tech is because it's not only cheaper than newer tech but is just the best in general for the goal of reaching the quartermile in the shortest amount if time possible. I'll explain it in my next point. 2.) 4v DOHC aren't really good for low end torque as they require far more time for a sufficient amount of air to pile up inside the combustion chamber, meanwhile the 2v OHV layout restricts airflow which makes it torquier at the low end and with proper gearing of the transmission can grant the car a relatively smoother torque curve at the high end at the wheel. The 4v DOHC only makes equal amounts of torque a 2v OHV has at the middle or very end of its rev range, which is precisely the reeason why you see a lot of sports cars utilize SOHC/DOHC alot, it is solely because they are meant for tracking the car around the local race track and are designed to be driven at a certain rev range for peak performance, which doesn't really help Dragsters as they would start from a dead stop which decreases the amount of time the engine needs to create torque and power. Turbos would also take more time to spool and that would take far too long for the Dragster to really obtain peak power in the short amount of time it has to make both the 4v and the turbo to work, which may cause you time, time that would have otherwise have been instantly used with a torquey 2v High Displacement Pushrod and Blower that directly inputs power the moment you step on the gas.
@@youngrody2386 don't argue with the guy he's got too much time posting shit talk about anything that's not a rice rocket on a donut media video meant for people just getting into cars lmao
Weird suggestion for a video. The difference between Piston engines used in aviation vs cars. So many aircraft have crazy displacement yet they don’t produce all that much power. What is up?
Low revs. On paper , the little continental in my dad's luscombe is rated at 65hp but it's been built to 75hp specs it's all legit it's allowed relax. Well, on paper it puts out about 150 ft pounds way down there too. Not bad from a 320 cube 4 cylinder that isn't revving over 2500 or so. As far as low power numbers ,try this. Ever seen a turbo 460 ford that only puts out 160hp? Yup, industrial. Turning a steady 1800 rpms. It's rated at 160hp@1800. Think about it, that's a ton of power, gear your project accordingly😃
Pre-mixed antifreeze is such a rip. Half gallon antifreeze, half gallon water for $12-$15 dollars. A few more dollars gets a whole gallon of antifreeze. Split it and you get 2 for 1.
Hey, could you talk about tire width? Like going from 225 to 235/245, what that does for stability and how it relates to braking and accelerating. How far can you go with maximizing width, and why we can't just go bigger instead of changing other equipment (cause tires are kind of cheap and easy to install). Please? Thanks. Great content, always.
The reason why its hard to find good information on a subject like that, is because it depends on interpretation of intuition behind the wheel with various setups. Go out, try your ideas. Learn, take notes. Why did the weight not transfer like i was expecting it to on that turn? Spin the car out. Drive beyond its limits, over and over again. Only until then, will you have the information and experience to be able tell why or when different tire widths are appropiate
To be fair, would love to see you guys using the Metric system ass wel. Now I am constantly googling how much pineapples per hyanakills the cylinders are.
figuring out how to squeeze this in the new "vette" . sure you loose the rear trunk, but going from lowish end Ferrari/Lambo/mclaren competitor to the high end. how does an 80k car turn into a 200k car. this engine with the upgrades to handle it.
true, but the larger the displacement becomes, the harder it gets to make 100hp/l or greater due to the increased parasitic, viscous, friction, and pumping losses inherent to engines while operating. Those losses don't really scale linearly with displacement either. So yes, it's fantastic that modern honda 2.0l I4's make over 100hp/l. But taking that to the 10l extreme is significantly more difficult. If you want a more apples to apples comparison, take the honda's power at 6600 RPM (or 7000, doesn't really matter), and see if that comes out to 100hp/l. Honda's make great power because they've been built to handle high-RPM long duration loads. And since HP = (Torque x RPM)/5252, the higher the RPM, the higher the HP reading is capable of being, so long as appreciable torque is being produced at those elevated RPM levels. The really cool thing is that this N/A spark ignition engine is operating at a level of torque that's normally reserved for Diesel truck engines. To me, that's far more impressive.
@@retoadyt3196 I think you mean 230 hp from a N/A 2.4L. That's about 96 hp per liter, same as the 632. I'd be pretty impressed if my 2.4L 22RE made 230 N/A horses.
They should make a top crate engine list.
Blueprint makes a 632 with a warranty that crushes the GM on price. At current market value its 15.5k for a fully dressed ready to run 632 that will run on pump gas.
There is nothing that will remotely come close to that value in a crate.
There are tests of that specific motor making 850 out of the box and has survived dyno pulls north of 2k with 22-24psi of boost.
Someone tell Pumphrey that crate engines need to chill out
Nismo sells some rb’s over in Japan but there the only manufacturer I know that sell them other then the American companies
The Monolist has heard our request
It's gonna have to be by hp or something because if it's based off of "performance" then the comments are going to be a shit storm.
I had a ZZ572 in my Chevelle...I was terrified, my passengers were terrified, motorists around me we terrified. It was the greatest car I will ever drive...I can't imagine the 632 but I am sure it is amazing
Women want scary movies.. men want a scary car! 😈
Im terrified just knowing it exist
If you aren't scared, you aren't going fast enough
But, can it handle?
If you're scared you shouldn't be going fast.
The big question is how do I fit the 632 in my miata?
Umm... that's a tough one
It might be easier fitting the Miata in the motor.
Or 🤔 my Pontiac Fierro
Same
you could fit a 6,2L hellcat engine in a miata atleast.... and then go to hennesey to pump it up to 1000 hp :)
If you have a forged ‘bottom end’ it can take quite a pounding! Quite a power bottom I say!
😂
Gross.... 🤮
Pretty crazy they can get this much power out of a wooden motor.
Haha 😂
Its not so crazy when we convert the ci to cc to litres, which in litres this crate engine is a 10.4, so no, not so impressive. It takes more litres to make the desired HP. Valkyrie is a 6.5 making 1000 HP, all motor.
@@retoadyt3196 but the Valkyrie makes 330ftlbs less torque due to that lower displacement, Maybe read up a bit on the differences and then come back. Horsepower is just revs, the Valkyrie needs 7 speeds, This crate motor would do fine with 4.
@@retoadyt3196 Chevy's widely available retail unit engine vs multi million dollar car thats already sold out. Heck F1 cars make more hp than Valkyrie.
@@user-nifinei34jd9 Both engines are completely different to each other, read up about them and you'll see what the differences are. A properly designed engine (Valkyrie) can produce much more power with less displacement needed than a poorly designed engine (ZZ632). Crate engines need to come into the 21st century already.
It's downright shocking how good GM can be when they really want to
agreed, say what you will about their interior quality but when it comes to motor or chassis development gm works hard to keep exotic manufacturers up at night (see C5/6/7r race cars, alpha platform camaros, ls7, lt6 ect)
? It’s a 10L engine. It’s not like it’s a good motor just huge
Even chrysler and ford can pump out some gems too the ford gt and the viper acr are some top notch vehicles. American manufacturers really get too much hate for not being good
@@garyaustin7987 they deserve all that hate
@@MrDwightsimon damn if only you could dislike comments on youtube you'd realize that you are clearly and flat out wrong and this comes from a Nissan fan boy
"Size matters, but its what you do with it that counts."
-Sun Tzu
Was that pun intended
Sun who? Japan lady..
@L E S D A 💥 Reported.
Sun Tzu also stated, "Walk softly, but drive a big block..."
That's what your dad said.
An all motor engine making 1000hp is absolutely remarkable. Bravo 👏🏽
N/A is where it's at.... fuck all that boost
@@davelowetsI needed this in my 88 Cheyenne. Had plenty of room for it. With 261 gears in the rear end too. Could finally reach it's top speed of blowing the tires out
Steps to how Chevy did it:
1. Large displacement
2. High compression
3. High gross flow
4. Low intelligence of the potential consumers.
@@nordic5490 thats not true bro. It's just recruit mode
@@vladimirzakrevski3157 well, you just proved that my point 4 is valid.
That engine has low migrange torgue for its size. Midrange torque where most driving is one. A smaller, lighter engine turbocharged will give much better midrange torque. Installing this heavy engine will transform your cars handling to be a total pig.
Fuel consumption at light throttle will be very bad also. I have a 800hp FG Falcon daily, that could be 1200hp just with stronger rods. There is no way I would install this ancient 60s tech pos engine. It has to be massive to make power, because it is so ancient and inefficient.
All modern engines are 4v dohc vvt, and most 2021 engines are also turbo.
@@nordic5490 I asked you to have the basic decency to not insult people based on what engine they want and you write a self righteous essay?
@@nordic5490 Stop making up bullshit, this engine makes over 600 foot pounds at only 3000 RPM with ZERO turbo lag. The lightweight aluminum heads also mean installing it in a car that came with any other big block Chevy would improve the handling not impede it.
Would love to see this beast stuffed in a first gen Monte Carlo.
Would be just like the monte from Tokyo drift that thing was sick
Funny thing is that the Monte carlo from Tokyo drift had a very similair motor making 800hp
@@basedlibertyprime I see you beat me to it with the Tokyo Drift comment lol.
or a yugo
Imagine an s10
Zach should put this in the Miata. Sure it'll have to be partially in his lap but he is a trooper.
put it in a miata and super charge it!
Someone squeezed a V12 from a toyota century in a miata so maybe its possible lol
@@likeablelabradoodle4035 was it a big secret?😉
@@likeablelabradoodle4035 link????
@@JustAboutToEat ua-cam.com/video/Kh2NRdVx_ns/v-deo.html
It’s somewhere in this video
I wonder how would the zz632 work with a supercharger or twin turbos or a 8-71 blower and of course 500 horse shot of nitrous
Definitely a 'Smiles-Per-Foot' type of build lol
It's designed to operate naturally aspirated, forced induction would just reduce the life of the engine!
12.1 compression so way too high to boost and besides an 8-71 is way too small for a 632. With a forged bottom end, that compression, and cam it would love nitrous. Not a 500 shot because I don't think you would want to spray 50% of the engine's power built like this in nitrous alone. 200 or 300hp in a couple stages or ramped in progressively sure.
@@chesspiece81 thinking the same. Making that kind of HP must have a huge compression ratio
You’d be surprised what a difference high octane pump gas can do for your engine. I had a suped up 71 SS and all I had to do to beat everything else on the road was to fill it half full of Ethel or Supreme and top it off with aviation fuel at our local small airport. I’ve even used a mothball before because they used to be made out of solid methanol. 50/50 Ethel and AVgas and hang on for dear life. Seriously it would be the difference of only burning out in 1st and 2nd to all four gears
I think that there should be more crate engines from manufacturers. Imagine an engine from Germany, England or Italy. Or a small displacement 150-300hp from Japan. Even if an existing design is produced for the next 10 years. I think it would be better than killing the ICE for good.
Imagine if Toyota sold 2JZ crates...
Nissans doing that rn with the rb absolute legends over there I want a new B-series personally
@@kettujabamiesukkeliukko so jp perfomance bought a new 2jz for their supra but i dont know if you just call toyota for that or if its a replacement part and you have to be a shop to get or what 🤷🏼♂️
@@Tchnfrq maybe it's just build by someone using new parts
I mean.. Toyota does sell the G16 3cyl engine from the GR Yaris as a crate engine in Japan. The engine is producing 257-272 with stock turbo, but capable of handling up to 475hp with bigger turbos & fuel injectors while maintaining stock internals.
One guy even put it in an AE86 a while back.
Dodge: “we brought back the 426!!!”
Chevy: “alright…… hey Ford, hold my beer……”
Chevy was just getting Ford back for the Bronco v Blazer thing, lol. And Dodge has always been ahead of the game. Jeep has never gone away, even a Renegade will do something off road if modified.
@@captainawesome7092 a renegade is a rebadged fiat lol
@@captainawesome7092 When was dodge ever ahead of the game?
@@captainawesome7092 maybe dodge is killing it in sales but when it comes to who's ahead of the game it's Chevy and haltech but even those guys are at the standard for performance production and modded cars
"hey ford, you know how you've been getting the bad rap for being more expensive than us for decades? we gona change that"
9:48 Get a classic mom minivan, and make it mid-engined, and put the monster in there. Don’t forget to get a 4/AWD. Also get a good muffler that lets you sleep/stealth mode, so you can get the most out of the sleeper mom van.
Edit: also, twin-charge it.
Might as well attach a jet engine bud 😂
@@Anon-tj2zk Fuck it, let’s do that too.
@@Anon-tj2zk put this baby in a top fuel dragster and see what happens
Now thats a project I wanna see get built
@@Anon-tj2zk get me one and Ill dp it 😂
This is a badass motor by some very talented engineers.
That air cleaner and intake manifold would look great coming out of my Miatas hood 😀
indeed it would.
i think the whole upper part of the block would poke out of the hood..
for the love of cars do it. we’ll help you drop the ca$happ
Yeah it wood
It would look better in a 68 challenger
The subtlety of his “mom” jokes still makes them hilarious even when you know it’s coming 🤣
When he said "In that episode I was a power bottom. No big deal." I died laughing lmao😂
I can't believe there aren't more comments on this. I had to skip back to make sure I heard what I thought I heard lol
I can’t believe he said that shit😂😂😂
I was eating when he said that, almost choked on my alfredo
I'd never heard anything that made more sense.
I felt like I was getting roasted "1 and a half of my mom"
The original big block Mark II "Mystery engine" had symmetrical ports, which GM decided were too expensive to mass produce so the Mark IV had the short and long intake ports. Decades later GM finally produced a symmetrical port big block engine which was what chief engineer Dick Keinath wanted from the beginning. Sadly, he didn't live long enough to see it happen as he died in 2010.
That symmetrical port big block sucked also....
Well in a way he did. The 8.1 liter Big Block available from 2000-2009 HD 2500,3500 GMC and Silverado had the same type of cylinder head.
Jeremiah: "Why is more horsepower better? Today, we put this crate engine in Catfish to find out!"
Oh, we see where this is going....and so does your boss!
10.4 liters sounds way more impressive than 632 cuin. Maybe it's because I'm used to thinking of cars in metric.
Even anything over 500 ci is insane by imperial standard
Cumstang?
That is 10 Geo Metros sounds cooler than imperial.
Its alot
Sounds like a conversation I had with a guy about his pick up.
"I gotta ask, what size engine is that?"
"A 351 M."
"No liters, just cubic inches."
"Yep."
But ya see, as soon as I heard "351" I knew instantly what we were talking about. I was able to convert to liters mentally, but I'm damn near 60, so my "baby boomer" brain still measures in cubic inches.
Howd they fit one thousand horses in a box? 🤯
@@レイナちゃん-q2o sus
Best comment cracked me up xD
The horses slim up for shipping, then hit the gym to become BUFF HORSES again.
La Machine
Having a box that can fit one thousand horses 🤯
I built a 502 cid Boss Hoss bike in 2002. It was fast and heavy but no handling. The engine was $7250 from Lubbock's Scoggin-Dickey Chevy Dealership. Ran hot in the summer but nice on a cool day. About 550 horsepower. The NESCO transmission gave out after 4 years of normal riding. A 632 cid would be nice in my 454SS truck.
Was you at the Branson cruise the next year or so?
Conversation in Cheavy office:
-"Hey, let's do a pinnicle of modern engineering."
---"So forced induction?"
-"No. Huuge displacement."
---"Extremely efficient heads. and high rew limit?"
-"No. Pushrods and some huuge valves."
---"Hi flow fuel injection?"
-"No."
---"So we make an engine that can idle 24/7 for a decade but for a racecar."
-"Ok, you can have fuel injection."
NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT BABY
1 There is nothing modern about forced induction, mercedes has been factory supercharging cars since the 1920s.
2 The heads actually are extremely efficient which is why the thing is making over 1K at only 6600 RPM. Just one of those aluminum heads cost more than most people pay for a whole used car.
3 More power from lower revs is always more efficient than a stressful delayed high RPM peak.
4 The thing would run even better with a carburetor as proven by Engine Masters carb vs efi dyno shootout.
@@Impactjunky This tech have been used even longer than merc has superchargerd their engines. So this is more like how can we make the most low tech engine using best manufacturing technics in use today.
Figures speak for them selves. Less than 100 bhp/per liter just screams a question of how much does it make when supercharged. And that's probably what happens for the most of these engines anyway. And two valves per cylinder aren't that much of a restriction with forced induction.
My very very important and appreciated opinion here:
Ford 1liter three cylinder turbo engine is more of an pinnicle of modern engineering than this. It actually makes that 100bhp/liter. Ten of those even weight less than 632. This is just "Let's take a truck engine and see how much can we cuddle out of it. By supersizeing it.".
Now I'm not saying this isn't impressive. But this sure is not the best Cheavy can do with an engineer or two.
@@damniambad Nope, the big block Chevy hit the market in 58, long after the first supercharged cars of the 20's. There is almost nothing modern about the manufacture or design of this ZZ632 either. High flow aluminum heads were available in the 60's and people have been home building 632 Chevy's with and without aluminum heads and fuel injection for decades. Comparing the power per liter of a forced induction motor to a NA motor is like comparing apples to oranges so your comparison with that weak little three cylinder makes no sense. Also the word is pinnacle not pinnicle.
@@Impactjunky Oh you are right! It is spelled pinnacle.
Other wise we can of course make whole new segment for zz632 so it can actually be good at something else than being big. Like the most american thing ever -segment. Or just best v8. Of this year. Made in america. And Is over 6,2 liters but under 12. And makes lot of noise. But not compared to displacement, cause its just too big for that.
Any Ferrari NA engine is just way better in any way but the cost and there are lots of better oil burnes on the engine market that make torgue lower down and actually make some sense in a truck.
I love how this engine has cylinders with a displacement as high as my brothers 4 pot 1.3L Yaris..
I take it you're not talking about a GR Yaris? So that is like saying "hahaha my car engine is bigger and has more power, then my sister's moped."
And even if it was a GR Yaris last time I checked it was a 3 banger, which kinda says a lot.
Not to mention the 2JZ GET which is a straight 6 that can put out about 2,000+ hp.
1,000 hp sounds like a good platform.
But it depends if they mean 1,000 potential hp, or 1,000 hp out of the crate? If it is out of the crate then yes it is a really good base to start from.
If not then you still need a lot of work to do and it doesn't seem as great anymore.
@@amehayami934 Yes the 2JZ-GTE is an impressive engine, but remember its turbocharged, how much power do you thing this engine could make if it had a turbo too? ;)
@@amehayami934 comparing FI is kinda apples and oranges but if you know the peak boost you can make a more apples to apples comparison.
Every 14.7psi of boost is equivalent to 1bar of boost which is also equivalent to 1 atmosphere. So a 5litre engine @1bar of boost has the same displacement as a 10L engine
Inline 6 engines are good. But 2,000 HP will not stay together. Even if it did for a short time. You would have more money in it than LS with a turbo. More power and torque, stronger and less money!!!
@@lorddoobsworth144 It might not be able to handle much if any boost. They made all internals as light as possible to get to 6600rpm.
So if you wanted to add boost, you would probably need chonkier internals and lower the max rpm.
Jeremiah is one of the only people that can say "let's go" and I actually understand what he's saying.
when it comes to crate engines (, I would suggest removing the oil pan and valve cover just to check it out (lube the springs and valves ) and pre oil the motor via the distributor if it has one or crank it over with no spark or fuel until you get oil pressure ,if you have roller lifters break in is no big deal
It COMES with a dyno sheet... it's ALREADY been done
Rear mount it in a wagon. Like a volvo or something along the sleeper lines.
A mid engine 740 Volvo wagon would work beautifully. That idea crossed my mind too.
I feel like no matter how unassuming a car you choose, this engine will be impossible to adequately hide to keep its sleeper status.
@@busslayer4790 I agree besides just how loud it is will be a dead give away.
Mid engine 2nd gen Outback.
Why? It'll do massive wheelies with the engine in the FRONT
We need to see Zak put this engine in a GT86/brz/frs
That would be awesome. Ridicoulous but awesome
I wanna see some one put it into a nissan z32 lol
That ZZ 632 is friggin awesome! I'd like to put that engine in a restomod
Ya me to when I get my 69 Camaro SS I want to put that engine in her😊
A 67 Firebird sounds like a good home!
Build nolans 1952 imperial into a fucking monster
That antifreeze ad was so adorable. Props to whoever wrote it! 😁👍
I wanna see a camaro with this. and a challenger with the hellaphant :)
Hoonigan has already thrown it in a camaro. Not a current gen, but it’s unreal
In an Ultima RS.
@@antontaylor4530 🤤
I wanna see the opposite of that lol
And they duke it out on a drag strip
The most gorgeous thing to come from Chevy!
*Most gorgeous in a loooooong time
In marine applications big blocks are still common including more then one the 454 is still in thousands of boats. As gm makes many of murcrusers engines from 4cylinder to big bad v8s. And there are some nasty race motors
Tru dat but at this level of power/weight/cost I'd go for a helicopter gas turbine. 😁
Considering the time and expense involved in modifying an existing engine to put out this sort of power, that price, while more than my entire car was new, that pricing really isn't all that ridiculous.
The 454 big block continued well after the 70’s with the final variant (vortec 8100) used all the way until 2001
Bulletproof
*8100
@@kumaWRX yeah typo on my end, thank you
2001 gmc sierra 2500 3500 had a 502bbc (8.1L) with an allison or 6r80. Some suburbans had the same setup. The 454 was 7.4L
@@justanotherdmax just guessing but I believe he meant the 8.1 was the last factory engine of 454 architecture.
Also, small correction, the 8.1 was 496cid.
*Day 29 of asking for an Up To Speed on*
1) Yamaha
2) Suzuki
3) MV Agusta
4) Aprilia
5) KTM
6) Triumph
6) Honda ( Motorcycles )
Us old folks remember when 'Mountain Motors' where a thing.
700+ CI's of insane power for drag cars.
chevy just finally decided to market one.
It'll be interesting to see how they start showing up in, and how well they actually run.
This would be an awesome upgrade to a Chevette. Hard to see how a 200hp electric motor, without controllers, batteries etc available too, is a runner up to this engine.
Nah, the illuminator is better
This has to be swapped into a Firebird and the 2nd or 3rd gen would be a perfect fit
Agreed. I vote 2nd gen though. Gotta do the bandit proud.
Hoonagen did that
Cleetus McFarland put a supercharged 632 in a third gen Camaro Burnout car
You should keep it classic/classy put it in a chevy nova II Great aftermarket support and guys have been putting big blocks in them for years. The weight to power ratio would be off the charts.
Well, I once saw a 87 Fiero that someone somehow shoehorned a Mk VI 502 crate motor into, complete with Hilborn style injector stacks. There's a pretty good project idea for Zach.
the long runners on the intake remind me of the 351 SVO crate engine. The 632 has even more air volume displaced so it sucks even harder to pack the intake charge with a hearty pulse.
632ci equates ti 10.356 liters, and manufacturers always round up, so they’d likely advertise as a 10.4L. Just like Ford’s Coyote engine actually has a displacement of 4.951 or something like that, so they round up to 5.0 and not 4.9. Small correction is all.
The 3rd Gen coyote is over 5L now it’s closer to 5.1
No that rounding up was for the Windsor. They haven't don't that since 1994. But yes that is true
Same with 6.2 L V8 Amg engines
ok?
@@dontyouworryaboutit_ it is over 5 liters but it would still be rounded to 5.0. It’s 5.035, closer to 5.0 than 5.1 so round down
A hilarious use of that engine would be to throw it in the back of a compact like a chevy spark and turn it into a rear engine fwd car. would take excessive amounts of modification and would probably tear itself apart but would be great to see.
absolutely no traction because that big ass hunk of weight is hanging over the wrong end of the car ; )
@@reilandeubank endless fwd burnouts while going nowhere at all..lol
Most likely it wouldn't be moving anywhere because the engine might be heavier then the car lol
Here's two ideas for that motor:
Easy: Make a new version of Stubby Bob. Instant cLiCkBaIt, or whatever.
Hard: Make a Chevrolet version of the Dodge Tomahawk.
Like a 2022 GMC Typhoon!
on youtube there's a old power block TV show uploaded that they took a old body style like the mid 90a ss454 truck, and made it awd with newer tahoe parts. they did a cheap ls swap, but this engine in the 2 door /blazer/Tahoe of the same Gen would be a full sized typhoon with the newer awd would be cool.
Didn't think about liking the vid until the mom joke! Hilarious
Great explanation as always from the best car channel around
Not really no
Put that engine into a modified late 60s-early 70s charger, that's a dream build right there.
WHY would you put a Chevy motor in a Dodge? Mopar sucks
P l e a s e do an International Scout II! It would be an amazing build. Has lots of space, heritage and going up in value! Would be cool to see something different
1973 International travelall 1010
Im still trying to get one out of my grandpa's barn
Minor gripe: big block did not go back to the 50s. I have the original Hot Rod magazine from 1965 debuting the "Mark IV mystery motor" which was the 396 in the passanger cars and the 427 in Nascar. Junior Johnson made the mystery motor famous in Nascar. The "W" engine 409 was developed in 61-62.
This thing would be perfect for a Chevrolet Cheyenne series pickup restomod! I can only imagine dropping one in a 1989 GMC 3/4 ton single cab longbed 4x4 and using it as mountain tow rig.
I’d dump this in my slammed 89 OBS dually and ditch that tired 454 .
I’d love to put this into my Pontiac 6000 LE.
I'd love to see one in a 93-95 Park Avenue, the engine bay is already huge and the chassis and suspension would be easier to reinforce compared to a more modern car
I saw your mom in my 93-95 park avenue last night
The ZZ632 has a factory warranty. The horsepower numbers are made with pump gas. GM may do a bit of testing and see what E85 fuel can make, I'm guessing in the 1200 HP range.
id love to see one of these in a spark/aveo
You been smoking dope, those cars are ugly af and bout every part and piece was junk have to put a tube frame/roll cage just so the thing doesnt shear apart
Sparks are junk, but a similar Japanese compact like a Prius or Yaris would be hilarious! They did put a hellcat motor in a Prius after all
I would love to see you put one of these into a Factory Five 818. It's a tube chassis, mid-engine kit car intended to be built from a donor Subaru Impreza or WRX that was designed to weigh 818kg (1800lbs). I don't know if it would fit, or if the Subaru transaxle could handle the power, but a 1000hp, 1800lbs, mid-engine, RWD track day car would be pretty awesome to see. Or you could be a bit more boring and put it into a Factory Five GTM Supercar, which is also mid-engine but was designed to be built from a Corvette donor with a Porsche transaxle.
It would be far too heavy for track use, you'd be better off going with a much smaller turbocharged Japanese engine like a 4G63, RB26 or 1/2JZ. Or, actually, an STi motor like they suggest would be a pretty good call.
It can if you brave enough, but it won't be competitive at all nor easy to drive
That thing really shine with lighter motor. You know, gokart feel instead of death wish feel when you step on the gas deeper
I’ve always been partial to the Ford Festiva SHOGUN style engine swap….so a mid engine rear wheel drive Golf would be awesome…
Or a Renault Clio V6 Renault Sport
No no no. Nothing would be funnier than a giant ass engine in a Miata. Don’t care how impossible is sounds, this needs to happen.
@@michaelryan5973 just take the front of the miata off. Badabing badabom, done.
@@tungabunga4107 to sacrifice the pop up headlights is a fate worse than death.
@@michaelryan5973 hell kitty miata. Its retarted
Put a 502 crate motor in my 62 chev biscayne wagon with a old school 4 speed..it's scary fast wonderful worth all the work and money
I'd love to put that engine in a 86 LS Monte Carlo that I've been neglecting for over a year.
I can hear the pain in that
Would love to see this thing in the back of some small car and have the intake pop out of the roof... like.. a golf
Miata
@@bmw-owner always the right answer
Look up the W12 golf, they had it on top gear. Volkswagen did it for the meme and put the motor behind the drivers seat.
For reference, my Blacktop BEAMS 3S-GE came from the factory with 200hp at the flywheel. It's a 2 liter, so that's like 5 of my engines both in displacement and power output. And reliably too. 🤯
Damn!
The 632 should go in a museum!
I'd opt for a '71-75 Coupe DeVille. They came with a 500ci (8.2l?) V-8 so I'd guess this crate engine would fit, and you have lots of room for a bigger transmission, diff, bracing, etc. etc. to take the power.
Or an early 70s El Dorado.
Correction. Only eldorados came with the 500 engine. DeVille's in those years came with the 472. But yes. There would be plenty of room for the 632 in the engine bay. I know because I have an all original 1971 coupe DeVille in my garage.
Anyone know why only hemi blocks are used in top fuel dragsters?
Hemishperical Cylinder Heads are better than the regular Penthouse Cylinder Heads you see in today's cars when it comes to making power, the only reason why you don't see them in the road today are the slight weight increase and emissions, both are not something a top fuel dragster would care about.
2 reasons:
1. Marketing - the target market expects this ancient 60s tech, and,
2. Limit top speed - the NHRA wants to keep the top speed down. Many tracks do not have the runoff room for higher speeds.
A 4v dohc engine will make more power for the same combustion pressures.
A turbo engine will make more power. 20-25% of top fuel engines power is used up driving the supercharger.
@@youngrody2386 I was just curious why a Chevy big block is not used in particular.
@@nordic5490
1.) Not really, the reason why the NHRA always used 60s tech is because it's not only cheaper than newer tech but is just the best in general for the goal of reaching the quartermile in the shortest amount if time possible. I'll explain it in my next point.
2.) 4v DOHC aren't really good for low end torque as they require far more time for a sufficient amount of air to pile up inside the combustion chamber, meanwhile the 2v OHV layout restricts airflow which makes it torquier at the low end and with proper gearing of the transmission can grant the car a relatively smoother torque curve at the high end at the wheel. The 4v DOHC only makes equal amounts of torque a 2v OHV has at the middle or very end of its rev range, which is precisely the reeason why you see a lot of sports cars utilize SOHC/DOHC alot, it is solely because they are meant for tracking the car around the local race track and are designed to be driven at a certain rev range for peak performance, which doesn't really help Dragsters as they would start from a dead stop which decreases the amount of time the engine needs to create torque and power. Turbos would also take more time to spool and that would take far too long for the Dragster to really obtain peak power in the short amount of time it has to make both the 4v and the turbo to work, which may cause you time, time that would have otherwise have been instantly used with a torquey 2v High Displacement Pushrod and Blower that directly inputs power the moment you step on the gas.
@@youngrody2386 don't argue with the guy he's got too much time posting shit talk about anything that's not a rice rocket on a donut media video meant for people just getting into cars lmao
This should be swapped in a 1970 Cadillac Fleetwood
1970 model K10 blazer 4wd project with a 632 man that thing would go anywhere no problems
What’s Up Donut Media!!! Love the Content! Working graveyard could be grueling but after each shift I look forward to watching your videos 😎❤️🏎
He’s pretty cool when he’s not overdoing the jokes
Right
It’s always a great day when Donut uploads!
Happy holidays guys ❤️🇵🇹
Please never discontinue this
Sounds like the money pit Miata needs to come back, and we can see Zach make all the people with an LS swap look silly!
Day 235 of asking Donut to bring old B2B back
RIP mate... but what is your problem with this kind of b2b I like it
this is a commercial channel, they don't care about what you want as long as they can keep making money on putting commercials in.
I love these videos!! So good at explaining car engineering.
Chevy's ZZ4, 5 and 6 are all great engines. Forged cranks, 4 bolt mains.....all the good stuff.
I just bought my 2014 suburban and I’d definitely do this engine swap 😂😂
Weird suggestion for a video. The difference between Piston engines used in aviation vs cars. So many aircraft have crazy displacement yet they don’t produce all that much power. What is up?
They just don't rev as high, limited by the maximum rpms of the propeller.
Reliability
yes. low rpm for prop use and mostly air cooled for reliability.
Direct drive, no gearbox for both weight and reliability, and the RPM is limited by the propellet tips not exciding the speed of sound
Low revs.
On paper , the little continental in my dad's luscombe is rated at 65hp but it's been built to 75hp specs it's all legit it's allowed relax.
Well, on paper it puts out about 150 ft pounds way down there too.
Not bad from a 320 cube 4 cylinder that isn't revving over 2500 or so.
As far as low power numbers ,try this.
Ever seen a turbo 460 ford that only puts out 160hp?
Yup, industrial.
Turning a steady 1800 rpms.
It's rated at 160hp@1800.
Think about it, that's a ton of power, gear your project accordingly😃
@zachjobe should try to make a rear-engined Yugo with a ZZ632. Hilarious.
Yugos are so trash, the car would probably just detonate lol
@@anynonymous1585 not if it’s done right. I saw a guy in Puerto Rico put a hayabusa engine in a Yugo, and it was awesome.
@@concernedcitizen2766 Excuse me what?
@@anynonymous1585 you read that right. A Hayabusa engine in a Yugo. Front-mounted though, for a ZZ632 in a Yugo would require a rear-mount setup.
@@concernedcitizen2766 If I ever saw a Yugo go by and then heard a Hayabusa engine, I would just die.
Pre-mixed antifreeze is such a rip. Half gallon antifreeze, half gallon water for $12-$15 dollars. A few more dollars gets a whole gallon of antifreeze. Split it and you get 2 for 1.
Id love to see a list of experimental engines that should have been produced
Put one of these in a campervan/motorhome and make the quickest home on wheels out there
It'd be better to take on the V8 shed but idk
Hell,why not put one in a GMC Motorhome?
This needs to go into a vw buggy. More engine than passenger capacity!🤣
It would be the car!
There already is a 572 in a buggy
Hey, could you talk about tire width? Like going from 225 to 235/245, what that does for stability and how it relates to braking and accelerating. How far can you go with maximizing width, and why we can't just go bigger instead of changing other equipment (cause tires are kind of cheap and easy to install). Please? Thanks. Great content, always.
The reason why its hard to find good information on a subject like that, is because it depends on interpretation of intuition behind the wheel with various setups. Go out, try your ideas. Learn, take notes. Why did the weight not transfer like i was expecting it to on that turn? Spin the car out. Drive beyond its limits, over and over again. Only until then, will you have the information and experience to be able tell why or when different tire widths are appropiate
I would love to see this engine with twin turbos 🔥
You can't it will hurt feelings
Can't wait for the hybrid Miata that mounts both this and the Eluminator. :D
Lol I knew someone was going to beat me to the Miata comment, but I think the Eluminator motor is quite the illuminating addition.
Would love to see that 632 sitting in a Chevy Vega
ua-cam.com/video/BShR1tDlLz8/v-deo.html
My 85 C20 2W. I'll be in Friday to pick it up.
This engine would be so good in the Jetta 🤩
Was thinking the same! Put it in the rear, sideways :)
I m waiting for the first miata engine swap with this engine
I would love to see you guys put one of those on James’s 86
I’ve got a Chevrolet 572 in my 67 Cutlass and it’s nuts! This would be even more insane 😁
talking about crate engine, can you guys review the Honda type R crate engine? they're pretty popular
Disgusting imo the way to go is a k24 and then a turbo and then awd. Imma do this in a crx one day but after I get my 68 camaro and 85 c10 short bed
To be fair, would love to see you guys using the Metric system ass wel. Now I am constantly googling how much pineapples per hyanakills the cylinders are.
i googled it too and he literally said it 5 seconds after that lmaoo its 10.3 l
That made me chuckle
I would love to see this in a 80's rx-7. If it would fit.
Definitely put the ZZ632 in a 68 Mustang would be sick!!!
figuring out how to squeeze this in the new "vette" . sure you loose the rear trunk, but going from lowish end Ferrari/Lambo/mclaren competitor to the high end. how does an 80k car turn into a 200k car. this engine with the upgrades to handle it.
Pretty sure the ZR1 will do just that.
@@retoadyt3196 ZR1 is rumored to use a 918 style hybrid setup.
@@hunterbowser667 thatll be nuts. Price too i assume lmao
My 21 year old Honda still had a lot more power per liter from stock.
Is it NA though? If not then you can’t compare them
@@th3airraidsir3n5 yes, it would be
true, but the larger the displacement becomes, the harder it gets to make 100hp/l or greater due to the increased parasitic, viscous, friction, and pumping losses inherent to engines while operating. Those losses don't really scale linearly with displacement either. So yes, it's fantastic that modern honda 2.0l I4's make over 100hp/l. But taking that to the 10l extreme is significantly more difficult.
If you want a more apples to apples comparison, take the honda's power at 6600 RPM (or 7000, doesn't really matter), and see if that comes out to 100hp/l. Honda's make great power because they've been built to handle high-RPM long duration loads. And since HP = (Torque x RPM)/5252, the higher the RPM, the higher the HP reading is capable of being, so long as appreciable torque is being produced at those elevated RPM levels.
The really cool thing is that this N/A spark ignition engine is operating at a level of torque that's normally reserved for Diesel truck engines. To me, that's far more impressive.
I wonder why people are so impressed with 1000 HP outta 10.4
Imagine getting impressed from 100 HP outta 2.4L lmao.
@@retoadyt3196 I think you mean 230 hp from a N/A 2.4L. That's about 96 hp per liter, same as the 632.
I'd be pretty impressed if my 2.4L 22RE made 230 N/A horses.
I’d like to see Zack try to fit that in his Miata! (I know it’s too big, but it would be hilarious to see him try!)
I'll put the ZZ632 in a 1965 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud for sure! 🤘🏼