The Complete Size Guide of the Creatures of Middle-Earth | Middle Earth Lore

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
  • Today we look at the complete size comparison guide of the major races and creatures from Tolkien's Middle-earth!
    In this video I have attempted to get all my information from the books, not the Peter Jackson adaptation movies!
    I hope you enjoy the video :)
    -----
    Also check out our other channels!
    The 6th Ranger - (For all things Power Rangers!)
    / @the6thranger
    History of Dragon Ball - (For all things Dragon Ball!)
    / @historyofdragonball
    -----
    Don't forget to check out our Official website!
    www.thebrokensword.co.uk
    If you want to support the channel, you can help us on our Patreon page. Lots of great, exclusive content, even discounts on our original merch! You have different tier options between $2 - $250, which can get you everything from exclusive access to upcoming videos, shoutouts, discounts, access to original artwork, producer credits on productions etc.
    / thebrokensword
    -----
    Also if you want to support in a different way then check out our Teespring page where we upload original designs for our merch!
    www.teespring....
    Also here are our other social media links too!
    Facebook page - / thebrokenswordyoutube
    Twitter - / thebroken_sword
    Instagram - / thebroken_sword
    ----------
    Please consider subscribing to the channel for all future updates based on the Lord of the Rings!
    Any future news and updates regarding the show or anything else, we will be sure to let you guys know ASAP!
    Also, if you have any suggestions for future videos too, then please leave a comment below!
    ----------
    We do not claim to own the rights to any of the art work used throughout this video. All credit must go to the talented artists. If we have not credited an artist, it is because we could not find an owner of the art. Please message us if we have not credited you!
    If any artists would like us to remove their artwork, or add anything additional to credit you, please contact us and we will sort it straight away! Thank you!
    CK Goksoy - www.artstation...
    Ivan Cavini - www.ivancavini...
    Ted Nasmith - www.tednasmith...
    Peter Xavier Price - www.deviantart...
    Adam Middleton - www.artstation...
    Magali Villeneuve - www.magali-vill...
    Thumbnail Art:
    "Ancalagon vs Earendil" - danpilla
    "Balrog vs Gandalf" - Omer Tunc
    "Hurin" - Alan Lee
    "Hobbit" - Jon Hodgson
    Art in order of First Appearance:
    The Witchking - Shockbolt
    Trolls in Mirkwood - Shockbolt
    Battle of Osgiliath - Shockbolt
    Evil by the Stones - Shockbolt
    The Dragon Awakens - Shockbolt
    Surprises in the Moonlit Night - Shockbolt
    Bard and the Thrush - Norloth
    Hobbit - Jon Hodgson
    Guardian of Gundabad - AlMaNeGrA
    The seven houses of the Khazad - Artigas
    Warg - carolinalang
    Uruk-Hai Champion - Taurus-ChaosLord
    Barrow Wight - Lordstevie
    Nazgul - JonHodgson
    Rohan Sword Thegns - RobbieMcSweeney
    Turin - Alan Lee
    Early Numenorean Armour - TurnerMohan
    Shadowfax - Smirtouille
    Beorn - Lelia
    Olog-hai - BrokenMachine86
    Balrog vs Gandalf - Omer Tunc
    Gothmog - pieter01
    Shelob - fanficgirl155
    Mountain Troll - Sascha Kozacenko
    Treebeard - JonathanGebel
    Rescued from the Black tower - Shockbolt
    Fellbeast and Rider - HaplessCat
    Oliphant - Wolfie180g
    Watcher in the Water - Falconer
    Smaug - Daniel Reeve
    Ungoliant (Front View) - KarlLevy
    Glaurung the Father of Dragons - WretchedSpawn2012
    Ancalagon vs arendil - danpilla
    ----------
    All content falls under fair use: any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and “transformative” purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner.
    In the event I use art of yours or you have any questions, please contact me and we'll get it sorted straight away! :)
    .
    .
    .
    #LordoftheRingsLore #MiddleEarthCreatureSizes #DragonSizeComparison

КОМЕНТАРІ • 550

  • @TheBrokenSword
    @TheBrokenSword  3 роки тому +125

    Hi everyone! There have already been a couple of comments asking for metric units as well as imperial that are mentioned in the video so here is a breakdown of the sizes I have used!
    1. Thrush - 1ft / 0.3m
    2. Hobbits - 3ft 6 / 1.07m
    3. Goblins/Orcs - 4-5ft / 1.2-1.5m
    4. Dwarves - 4ft 6 / 1.35m
    5. Wargs - 5ft / 1.5m (8ft / 2.4m long)
    6. Uruk-hai - 5-6ft / 1.5-1.8m
    7. Barrow Wights - 6ft / 1.8m
    8. Nazgul - 6ft / 1.8m
    9. Men - 6ft / 1.8m
    10. Elves - 6ft 2 / 1.85m
    11. Numenoreans - 6ft 6 / 1.95m
    12. Horses - 6ft 6 / 1.95m
    13. Beorn (Human) - 8ft / 2.4m
    14. Olog-hai - 9ft / 2.7m
    15. Beorn (Bear) - 12ft / 3.6m
    16. Balrogs - 12ft / 3.6m
    17. Shelob - 13ft / 4m
    18. Trolls - 13ft / 4m
    19. Ents - 14ft / 4.25m
    20. Great Eagles - 30ft / 9m (Thorondor - 180ft wingspan / 54m)
    21. Fellbeasts - 30ft / 9m
    22. Mumakil - 35-45ft / 10.5-13.7m
    23. Watcher in the Water - 60ft / 18m
    24. Smaug - 66ft / 20m
    25. Ungoliant - 100ft / 30m
    26. Glaurung - 250ft / 76m
    27. Ancalagon the Black - 1000ft / 300m
    I hope that helps :D

    • @rangerofthenorth1970
      @rangerofthenorth1970 3 роки тому +2

      Guys, pls one q....what will happen to History of the Ages channel, are you going to delete it or what....?

    • @Ptaaruonn
      @Ptaaruonn 3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for the conversions.

    • @shadowcloudspher5149
      @shadowcloudspher5149 3 роки тому +3

      The complete size guide to weapons of middle earth would be a good video.

    • @Enerdhil
      @Enerdhil 3 роки тому +3

      How about giving Tolkien measurements in rangas, ells, fathoms and furlongs? lol

    • @bgonzales817
      @bgonzales817 3 роки тому +1

      Forgot to turn on notifications!

  • @ancalagontheblack4930
    @ancalagontheblack4930 3 роки тому +354

    Thanks for not forgetting me

  • @jonathonfrazier6622
    @jonathonfrazier6622 3 роки тому +104

    Beorn has to be over 9 feet tall. His loin cloth hung to his knees and Bilbo, who I think was 3 foot 6 inches, could walk between his knees knees and not have to duck. This means Beorn's knees stood over 3 and a half feet tall.

    • @themydnighthour
      @themydnighthour 3 роки тому +32

      Imagine how far his junk hung down? I wonder if Bilbo had to dodge.

    • @derrickstorm6976
      @derrickstorm6976 3 роки тому +5

      @@themydnighthour your "logic" eats itself...

    • @themydnighthour
      @themydnighthour 3 роки тому +13

      @@derrickstorm6976 maybe he had a huge hog. Who knows.

    • @Crafty_Spirit
      @Crafty_Spirit 3 роки тому +5

      I was looking for this comment. It indicates that Beorn has the height of a troll, what an image 😅

    • @pacrat6271
      @pacrat6271 2 роки тому +4

      @@themydnighthour considering that in the book he didn’t have to duck we can assume he didn’t have to “dodge”

  • @mewtationnation3554
    @mewtationnation3554 3 роки тому +42

    I’ve always felt that the balrogs varied greatly in size, with the the majority being 12-14 feet, and with greater balrogs like Gothmog and Durins Bane being closer to 20ft.

    • @codelicious6590
      @codelicious6590 2 роки тому +5

      It makes sense that the Balrogs' size wouldve reflected their malice and amount of time they had been in the service of Melkor, perhaps even been larger and more powerful due to their close proximity to the Dark Lord.

    • @Hundredyacrewoods
      @Hundredyacrewoods 2 роки тому +1

      I don't understand where people get this "greater" and "lesser" Balrogs idea from as if Tolkien didn't say "I don't suppose there were ever more than 3 of at most 7" at *most* 7. If it comes from Tolkien's earlier draft for The Fall of Gondolin then they should know that that was abandoned and replaced (several times over) and is no longer in *Any* way Canonical.

  • @GM_LEONG
    @GM_LEONG 3 роки тому +80

    Have you considered an intro that says, "build me a channel worthy of mordor?" I kinda miss the old intro, but I'm keen to see all your brilliant ideas come to life in your new videos. Keep up the great work!

    • @jamesaron1967
      @jamesaron1967 3 роки тому +6

      The old intro was the best on ANY channel!

    • @TabiOya
      @TabiOya 2 роки тому +1

      I’m sorry I forgot what was the old one 😅

  • @ryanol
    @ryanol 3 роки тому +16

    I really like the addition of art credits in video as opposed to just being in the description. Great new start.

  • @WarriorBane
    @WarriorBane 2 роки тому +4

    One of the only accurate size comparisons for lotr on youtube with excellent pictures nicely done

  • @codelicious6590
    @codelicious6590 2 роки тому +3

    The Watcher in the Water from Durin's door scene in the movie was hideous enough to give me nightmares! So, if Ungoliant was around 100' wide normally, then she most definitely wouldve given Melkor a bit of trouble after having gorged herself on the two Trees and several of Feanor's gems of light- she did grow in malice as well as size at that time I believe so Yeesh, truly gargantuan -I picture her upper portions actually reaching the clouds when I envision her demanding of Melkor he fulfill his promise to give "with both hands" but then again, Melkor was most likely much larger than a typical humanoid figure at that time as well.

  • @natenichols9569
    @natenichols9569 2 роки тому +6

    The only one I really imagined larger was ungoliant. In my mind she was absolutely massive, not physically, but in her aura, which could literally drink in light enough to cover both her and melkors approach to the two trees. Her actual physical size I never gave much thought to.

  • @h3nrg
    @h3nrg 3 роки тому +31

    I've always loved the idea that Ancalagon was truly massive, to the extent that he could block out the sun and crush Thangorodrim when he fell on it. It may not be all that realistic but I read the Silmarillion as poetry more than a literal history so I was swept up and excited imagining him at this colossal size. It also helped me feel that he really did push back all the forces of Good for a good while until he was killed.

    • @Crafty_Spirit
      @Crafty_Spirit 3 роки тому +1

      You know, it's a shame that we don't know the dimensions of the rooms inside Angband. He must have fitted through its gate anyway...

    • @christiansenator
      @christiansenator 3 роки тому +5

      Totally agree, it reads as exaggerated legend, not necessarily precise boxes of measurement

    • @Paulafan5
      @Paulafan5 3 роки тому +3

      A 500 foot long dragon could cast a massive shadow over a battlefield and if it fell from a great enough height it would do massive damage to Thangorodrim when it fell. 500-1000 feet long seems to be big enough to fit the description and do the damage.

    • @sawyeratkinson
      @sawyeratkinson 3 роки тому

      I mean he died to a dude on a boat that was also a spaceship so...I say you can take the size literally

    • @snowman9631
      @snowman9631 2 роки тому +1

      i could have sworn he was described to be as big as mountain

  • @rangerofthenorth1970
    @rangerofthenorth1970 3 роки тому +46

    Guys, thank you for this, this tophic always confused me, Im so glad this channel has back, amazing video and just go step by step and this channel will be ONE TO RULE THEM ALL!!!!!!!

    • @TheBrokenSword
      @TheBrokenSword  3 роки тому +10

      Thanks so much for the continued support! :)

  • @GiantsBeauceronsRugby
    @GiantsBeauceronsRugby 3 роки тому +40

    Would’ve been good to have tried to workout the size of Huan and the Werewolves and compare them to the Wargs

    • @leonardofaber5823
      @leonardofaber5823 3 роки тому +6

      Huan was big enough for Lúthien to mount him. Wild guess? The size of a normal horse.

    • @GiantsBeauceronsRugby
      @GiantsBeauceronsRugby 3 роки тому +4

      @@leonardofaber5823 but the wargs were also ridden

    • @leonardofaber5823
      @leonardofaber5823 3 роки тому +5

      @@GiantsBeauceronsRugby Wargs were big enough for regular orcs to mount, not all kinds. And regular orcs were almost of hobbit-size, so wargs should not be that big.

    • @pacrat6271
      @pacrat6271 2 роки тому +2

      @@GiantsBeauceronsRugby well they’re around 5 for tall even if they were ridden they’re not that tall, just the size of a pony or short bear
      I myself am 5,1 so to me they’d be tall but I’ve met real life dogs almost as tall as me

  • @Aelrandir
    @Aelrandir 3 роки тому +18

    Very interesting video. I kind of don't mind how PJ increased the size for Durin's Bane and Smaug. In Smaug's case especially because seeing him be that big on screen really made it more believable that he would stop the dwarves from being able to recover the Lonely Mountain. Not sure if it would have had the same believability if he was a lot smaller. Also I hate to be that guy, but the picture you guy used for elves is not an elf, but Turin :P Note the dragon helm and black sword.

    • @portnet31
      @portnet31 2 роки тому +6

      i was shouting that in my head, (about turin)

    • @alanboulter7319
      @alanboulter7319 2 роки тому

      Nice Turin catch.

    • @David-fh6rr
      @David-fh6rr 2 роки тому +2

      Well, Turin Thurambar, when in Nargothrond was described as being no less in stature and looks than the noble of the Noldoli

  • @jannestiemes4328
    @jannestiemes4328 3 роки тому +36

    The idea of trolls being larger than balrogs just doesn’t sit right with me, great video though!

    • @cleanerben9636
      @cleanerben9636 3 роки тому +5

      I think given their power they could probably appear almost an size they wished. The fear is probably what made them feel huge and made other seem small and helpless.

    • @corgi42069
      @corgi42069 3 роки тому +9

      Size isn't everything. Fingolfin wounded Morgoth himself, and was much smaller. He was also an elf against a Valar, and the Valar was hesitant to even fight. Puts it into perspective

    • @karerabbe7829
      @karerabbe7829 3 роки тому +2

      They arent at all tho, this is very wrong:) Shelob isnt bigger than Balrogs either most likely:)

    • @corgi42069
      @corgi42069 3 роки тому +2

      @@karerabbe7829 she may be, she's a child of Ungoliant after all.

    • @andrewverrett568
      @andrewverrett568 2 роки тому +3

      Small but they are far greater beings, they are miair

  • @abbyyates9533
    @abbyyates9533 3 роки тому +8

    I’ve always been a little confused by this stuff, so having it all in one video is fantastic! Loving the new logo and intro guys

  • @trenthardcastle
    @trenthardcastle 3 роки тому +6

    The quality of these new videos are getting more and more impressive. Keep up the great work lads!

  • @ellanenish5999
    @ellanenish5999 3 роки тому +4

    I think this is one of the best if not the most reliable comparison of Tolkien's species shown on YT. It's awesome that you really focused on the book source on this new channel. Keep your work guys, this new channel maybe isn't so popular yet, but it is much, much better than HotA.

  • @Nat1videos
    @Nat1videos 3 роки тому +22

    Awesome, been waiting for this :)

    • @TheBrokenSword
      @TheBrokenSword  3 роки тому +8

      Hope you enjoyed it!

    • @Nat1videos
      @Nat1videos 3 роки тому +4

      @@TheBrokenSword Very much !

    • @loraelstad8941
      @loraelstad8941 3 роки тому

      @@TheBrokenSword This man right here: Michael of Nat 1 Videos, is the man who brought me to your channel. Loving it, so far, in this first video I have seen. Heard a wee bit about the previous channel and how you are starting again here. You’ll definitely be seeing me as a regular from now on. Definitely a big Tolkien fan. Even my & my hubby’s wedding bands are One Ring replicas. If we’d had a more elaborate wedding than just being in a courthouse, we might’ve even cosplayed for it. 😄 Thank you for the content you bring. Also, there are more than 1 of you, aren’t there? How shall I address each of you or should I lump you 2gether as Broken Sword 🗡? 😁

    • @thomashylemon9975
      @thomashylemon9975 2 роки тому

      @@TheBrokenSword how big was sauron I don't know if you mentioned it or not it seems like he was gigantic in the movie

  • @ninjabanana
    @ninjabanana 3 роки тому +11

    love the video guys, however there’s a pretty glaring omission: wheres bill the pony???

  • @FantasySci5
    @FantasySci5 3 роки тому +7

    Very interesting! Since the orcs were made from elves, I would think they would have been closer in height, but maybe as they bred they got smaller and smaller.

    • @loraelstad8941
      @loraelstad8941 3 роки тому +3

      Hi. Brand new here today. I always figured the corruption process shriveled them some. 👍🏻

  • @TransRoofKorean
    @TransRoofKorean 2 роки тому +5

    -Honestly, for Ungoliant, I think your size you show is closer to the starting size... but I think the size Ungoliant ends up being is more like to being the largest creature that could ever exist. It's clear that the myth Tolkien was going for representing is the creature that would never stop eating until, in the end, it essentially eats the planet, eats the stars, eats existence. "Impossibly large" is where I would have put him. On the other hand, considering Shelob, while obviously less-impossibly sized, I'd remind you to remember many creatures' abilities to crawl through spaces obviously smaller than them... not just invertebrates like spiders and cockroaches, but consider mice: any space that is wide enough to fit the skull of something in the animal kingdom is wide enough to fit the animal that is adapted for squeezing into holes. So, Shelob *_could_* be much larger, surely. After all, I think there's reason to believe Shelob is the largest remaining of the descendants of Ungoliant.
    -Smaug... gosh the Hobbit movies were horrible. I remember when I got around to watching them during early covid lockdown days, I saw Smaug, and immediately the thought... "what is that, 200ft long? 300? longer?" -- "they won't ever be able to make any other Tolkien adaptations with the older, greater dragons, because they already made so stupidly, impossibly big" -- and then when Smaug is slain, he crashes into the water, I pause the movie and I'm stunned (and pissed): "what the hell, now Smaug is only like 60ft long? did they really forget what size they had made the dragon, and now he's 1/5 the size? *_what the hell are they doing?!?!_*
    -I think a theme in general in Tolkien's work is that the earlier the creature was created, the larger they are compared to their descendants. The eldest elves, the ones who knew Valinor, I'd expect to be easily a foot taller than later ones; same goes with men that have Maiar and Elvish blood, like Numenoreans, and often I'd predict a lot of kings both of men and elves to be taller, so I'd expect the Nazgul to probably be more on the 6'6 end than 6'.
    -Balrogs ofc being corrupted Maiar, and Maiar being something like minor gods, they have quite a few abilities, some of which we know, as with Sauron, to be that of shape-shifting. Quite a large range of balrog sizes I imagine are possible because of this... 12-20ft probably was in Tolkien's mind, but I never forget early in life seeing that great Ted Nasmith painting, which was probably PJ's main inspiration... in Nasmith's picture the Balrog is clearly well over a hundred feet tall, and y'know what, I'm glad PJ went with that, because it *_looks perfect to me._* I don't think it's unbelievable, either, in that world: "what's that, an ancient being of extreme magical power decides to appear as something of a far greater size? well, alright!"
    -Glaurung, you correctly point out creatures of the First Age are "generally" bigger [nah, I'd say "essentially always"] -- consider Tolkien's picture, although I don't think it's _meant_ to show scale, does clearly show the dragon spanning the great river _easily_ between its front and back legs, with a tail that stretches more than twice the length behind. Who knows how long. 200-250ft? I'd say 10x that length isn't unreasonable. After all, as you point out, long and narrow, more snakelike with legs.
    Essentially: I'd go with _much larger_ for most of your beasts that are legendary and legendarily ancient even within the knowledge of the legendary world of Middle-Earth.

    • @warfare1101
      @warfare1101 Рік тому

      I think you forget that the cinematography makes Smaug seem bigger than he is, not to mention the dwarves and Bilbo are only 3-4 feet tall

    • @TransRoofKorean
      @TransRoofKorean Рік тому

      @@warfare1101 I'm not forgetting anything, it's about pausing the movie, considering perspective, and comparing it to objects that would be of a known height
      Pause it when Bilbo first sees him and again when he crashes into the water, put the two side by side -- I'm sure you can find stills of it
      I'm not wrong, he loses over half his length, maybe even three quarters

    • @warfare1101
      @warfare1101 Рік тому

      @@TransRoofKorean You literally just rephrased everything I just said

    • @TransRoofKorean
      @TransRoofKorean Рік тому

      @@warfare1101 not really at all

    • @warfare1101
      @warfare1101 Рік тому

      @@TransRoofKorean The reason Smaug looks smaller is because in the mountain, you are looking through the perspective of a dwarf/Hobbit. That's why the camera almost always points upwards at Smaug whenever he's on screen. But once he's in Lake-Town, you are looking at him through the perspective of Elves/Men, hence why he appears to be smaller since the camera is almost either at his height or just below him. There also isn't really anyone standing next to him to show a good height perspective. It's all about the camera work

  • @lukamijic4335
    @lukamijic4335 3 роки тому +6

    Almost 10k subs already. Quality content as always. We wish you guys all the best in restoring your former glory! 👌
    May the Valar bless your journey!

  • @zarkostojanovic8749
    @zarkostojanovic8749 3 роки тому +8

    Good job. Maybe you could do a video about the difference in size between Eldar of Valinor, Sindar, Nandor, and Avari.

  • @JohnSmith-bt3xh
    @JohnSmith-bt3xh 3 роки тому +12

    It was an interesting video👌
    This made things quite clear🌟

  • @atilax6452
    @atilax6452 3 роки тому +2

    Balrogs are Maiar. Like Sauron, Gandalf, Saruman, etc.
    They can shape change.
    Sauron, when he took the field during the War of the Last Alliance, is his normal height.
    The Wizards purposely made themselves look smaller, weaker, older and more frail, for their mission to the East.
    It would be hard to nail down an exact height for Balrogs, but they were at least Sauron's height.
    Then, take into consideration that Balrogs are actually Maiar, "suped-up" by Melkor.

  • @oh8658
    @oh8658 3 роки тому +8

    Love the vid and so glad u guys r back, can’t wait for more awesome content like this

  • @JCFollower1
    @JCFollower1 3 роки тому +2

    I think Beorn's height was greater by the book reference that he wore a tunic that hung to the top of his knee. “As for Bilbo he could easily have trotted through his legs without ducking his head to miss the fringe of the man’s brown tunic.”

  • @beneisen6982
    @beneisen6982 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent video. I like the translucent scrolling comparison on the bottom to keep track of the past and future creatures.

  • @opalglass8101
    @opalglass8101 3 роки тому +2

    Ancalagon would still have been able to "destroy" Thangorodrim if he was "only" 1000 feet long. Because when you think about it, Thangorodrim are volcanoes. And when a volcano "destroys" itself during an explosive eruption (think Mt. Saint Helens), they tend to blow at least 1000 m off their summits.
    Morgoth made Thangorodrim from the slag and debris he dug out of Angband, but it doesn't mention if their integrity is sturdy like an average mountain or flimsy like a cinder cone (cinder cones are volcanoes like the SP Crater in Arizona or the Lava Butte in Oregon). The more I think about it, the more I like to think that Thangorodrim was comprised of three very tall cinder cones.
    I've never been to a cinder cone in person, but pictures of them show that they are comprised of loose rocks. If something as large as a dragon of Ancalagon's size were to hit them, it would probably be something akin to someone running and jumping into one of those sand sculptures at those contests at beaches.
    So they would be destroyed without needing a dragon bigger than a volcano.

    • @Crafty_Spirit
      @Crafty_Spirit 3 роки тому +1

      I had similar thoughts before, good that you posted this in such detail 👍🏻

    • @Paulafan5
      @Paulafan5 3 роки тому

      Dragon hide is tough and a dragon falling from a great height would be like a cannonball. My guess is 500 feet long, which is still massive and could destroy a mountain side if it fell onto it.

    • @hugo-pg5tv
      @hugo-pg5tv Рік тому

      @@Paulafan5 so what about the land that sunk into the ocean when he died?

  • @sdev2749
    @sdev2749 3 роки тому +2

    Awesome video, your estimations are perfect. If you look at the RPG: Chivalry & Sorcery 2nd Edition your estimates align PERFECTLY with this game written way back in 1977-1983

  • @skytrailer2563
    @skytrailer2563 3 роки тому +2

    I am so happy that y’all are back!!! 🤗

  • @richardbenge5376
    @richardbenge5376 3 роки тому +1

    I am so overjoyed you are making videos again, thank you so much.

  • @mattbryant4910
    @mattbryant4910 3 роки тому +6

    brilliant glad you liked the suggestion

  • @chrisrivas289
    @chrisrivas289 3 роки тому +3

    You forgot about maybe the largest of them all, although mentioned briefly, the stone giants in The Hobbit. I'm assuming they must have been massive.
    Great first video original to this channel! I cannot wait for more!

    • @zionthedragon8866
      @zionthedragon8866 3 роки тому

      Stone weren't the largest, that was a movie thing, and it was a poetic term for trolls. A lot of the book is poetic, but not many know which lead to the confusing things in the movie.

    • @TransRoofKorean
      @TransRoofKorean 2 роки тому

      I think it was less that it was "poetic", and more that the Hobbit was released earlier, before Tolkien had refined a lot of his visions of the world. The stone giants _probably_ became the stone trolls in his mind -- maybe he even said so, and that seems entirely right -- but I don't think they were once called "giants" out of poetry, but essentially because it was an earlier version of the world.
      And frankly, I have a feeling Peter Jackson never even showed up during the movie. I dunno what the hell was going on there... I figure the "confusing things in the movie" was simply because they rushed it because the Hobbit might have come out of copyright, and they didn't really care about the product. Like when Bilbo sees Smaug it's probably 300ft long, then when it crashes into the water more like 60ft... you don't have a discrepancy where something becomes a tiny fraction of its original size because you're representing something in the book... nah it's done because it was rushed, thoughtless, and careless.

  • @codelicious6590
    @codelicious6590 2 роки тому +2

    I wish there were more detailed information about how Morgoth went about creating or corrupting the dragons or wurms and the Orcs as well.

  • @susandolan9543
    @susandolan9543 3 роки тому +1

    As to the measurement of horses, they are measured in "hands". The tallest riding horses stand 16 to 17 hands high. The term " hand" refers to the distance of the tip of the thumb spanning across the open hand to the tip of the pinky finger. Later this was uniformly made into 4 inches. So a 17 hand horse, measured from the top, or point of the shoulder (where the neck, shoulder blade and spine meet) down to the ground. So you take 17 multiply it by 4 then divide by 12 and you get 5.6 feet. Shadowfax would have to be 19 or 20 hands high (roughly the size of a typical Draft breed of horse) in order to stand over 6 feet tall at the shoulder and Gandalf would've needed a small ladder to mount him. He, Shadowfax, also wouldn't have been as fast as Tolkien described him to be. Draft horses are, what is described as being cold blooded (not by the temperature if their blood but by their temperament or disposition) they just aren't as fast as Hot Blooded (Oriental or Thoroughbred) or Warm Blooded (crosses of Draft with Oriental/Thoroughbred) horses. Granted if you measure from how high a horse can raise his head, then yes you would get a height of 6 foot. Horses however are measured from the point of the SHOULDER to the ground.

  • @Ablon94
    @Ablon94 3 роки тому +3

    These illustrations are really good! good video!

  • @FANATIC40k
    @FANATIC40k 3 роки тому +5

    " I threw down my enemy, and he fell from the high place and broke the mountain-side where he smote it in his ruin" Gandalf about the Death of the Balrog. And nobody goes crazy saying it must have been gigantic like many many ppl do when talking about Ancalagon. Those sizes in your video are probably among the most accurate you can find :)

  • @iwanttofart8009
    @iwanttofart8009 3 роки тому +4

    I really liked your video, I thought Galadriel and Celeborn where 6 foot and to be considered taller among other elves.

  • @davect01
    @davect01 3 роки тому +1

    "Build me an Army, full of Broken Swords"
    A great video ☺️
    I always thought the Fell Beasts were just a variant of Dragon

    • @derrickstorm6976
      @derrickstorm6976 3 роки тому

      I'd rather be returned to Minas Tirith, though 😂🥲

  • @aislinrose1
    @aislinrose1 3 роки тому +3

    Another great video. And thanks for using imperial measurements so it was actually understandable. And even though I don't understand metrical all I also appreciate the fact you put conversions in the pinned comments for those that need them. I think it shows your love for your fan base and your commitment to be as inclusive as possible with the information.
    Edit:I forgot to mention it but I love the new channel and wish you the best! I look forward to watching it grow again

  • @Glory_inthe_3rd77
    @Glory_inthe_3rd77 2 роки тому +1

    I am so glad you corrected that average height thing I hate when people exaggerate or lessen actual truth I just have a thing about it I cannot stand but at the same time I would think that most people wouldn't like lies anyway but then again some of the people I've met there are people that absolutely adore lies

  • @loganestrada2311
    @loganestrada2311 3 роки тому +1

    I kinda figured that the Balrogs were a little bigger than you think. And Ancalagon was about the size you say. Thankyou for your content.

  • @gr81allday
    @gr81allday 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent video as usual guys! Thank you very much!
    Sizes are logically spot on my friends!

  • @rollingthunder1043
    @rollingthunder1043 2 роки тому +2

    I feel like you underestimated the size of Ancalagon the Black. In the Silmarillion it says the Towers of Thangorodrim were broken in his ruin when he died (which you commented on), and if that's to be taken literally it means he was so absolutely titanic that he was able to smash two mountain peaks by falling on them. That speaks to me of a dragon that's several miles long at least.

    • @waynepurcell6058
      @waynepurcell6058 2 роки тому

      Well when Gandalf killed the balrog he stated "I threw down my enemy, and he fell from a high place and BROKE THE MOUNTAINSIDE where he smote it in his ruin". A balrog isn't that big, maybe a little more than twice as big as a man and he still "broke the mountainside".
      I look at it like this, such destruction may be due to the power that is contained within the creature being released upon its death. Think about it like this, the "Little Boy" atomic bomb wasn't big at all but look what it did to Hiroshima when its energy was released.

    • @TransRoofKorean
      @TransRoofKorean 2 роки тому

      ^I think what's ignored here is how magic is often manifested in Tolkien's world. Beorn's bear shape may be even larger to other bears than his human shape is to humans. Valar and Maiar are often quite capable of changing shape, especially the evil ones... not just into werewolves.
      When Morgoth emerges to fight Fingolfin he's "like a mountain", leaving craters with each blow and the probably 7ft tall athletic Fingolfin can only stab him in the foot, leading one to assume Morgoth is manifesting himself as *_hundreds_* of feet tall. And then you consider, _that_ is the god that feared Ungoliant would eat him -- clearly Ungoliant is almost certainly the largest of all creatures, they probably underestimated by at least a hundred times here. That's the sort of creature that is getting to be a size that it could start _eating_ mountains, which is clearly what Tolkien was hinting at with his mythology of Ungoliant. And yeah, when you consider a scale like that, the longest and largest dragons smashing mountains, or even a fallen Maiar like a balrog taking a giant shape makes a hell of a lot more sense.
      Kinda like it's entirely reasonable that Sauron shows up as a fair 6'6 elf to some, then goes into battle as a 15' tall black-clad warrior. It's not something everyone can do, but it's certainly something some of them could do.

  • @c5on
    @c5on 2 роки тому +1

    I love the picture where Ancalagon the Black is tall as mountain. In my mind Silmarillion times where every monster were bigger then normal, because magic and Melkor were running free.

  • @jamesaron1967
    @jamesaron1967 3 роки тому +4

    Great video. Pretty much coincides with my mental depictions for the size of Tolkien's creatures. Hollywood almost always exaggerates reality. Partly because it wants to sell tickets and partly because good visuals onscreen mandate it. If Peter Jackson wanted to adhere to Tolkien for the size of Smaug, as one example, how underwhelming would that dragon be on the big screen at several dozen feet? Would there be as much interest to movie goers and Tolkien fans alike? I somehow doubt it. Tolkien fans would complain Smaug is way too small and in certain aspects they'd be correct. Not for being inaccurate to the lore, but for failing the suspension of disbelief in regards to the character's actions and abilities in the story. You cannot change what is depicted in a movie in the same way you can form an image in your mind whilst reading the source material.

  • @tregonzo
    @tregonzo 3 роки тому +2

    The 'Breaking of Thangorodrim' is to say the power of Thangorodrim was broken with the downfall of Angcalagon the Black.

  • @SR-di7ox
    @SR-di7ox 2 роки тому +1

    In fairness to the "size" of Shelob in the movies, she is being compared to Sam, Frodo and Golem. Compared to them she would seem far larger on screen than a normal human.

  • @Jonathan-tg6qv
    @Jonathan-tg6qv 3 роки тому +4

    Already nearly 10k

  • @Enerdhil
    @Enerdhil 3 роки тому +5

    Great topic. I understand how you arrived at most of your calculations, but 1000 feet for Ancalagon the Black? That raises too many questions for me.
    Where the heck was he kept when was not in the air battling Earendil in Vingilot? How many orcs and captured elves did he eat a day? Did he issue from the Gates of Angband? Is there a secret special entrance and "hanger" for something that large behind Thangorodrim? Or did he have an eyrie somewhere deep in the Ered Engrin? Also a 1000-foot dragon could certainly swallow Vingilot and Earendil whole, so how did Earendil kill him with a sword smaller than the size of a toothpick to the dragon? Another thing, would the wingspan also be a bout 1000 feet?
    Anyway, this is like Peter Jackson's Stone Giants, IMO

  • @MrFarnanonical
    @MrFarnanonical 2 роки тому +1

    3:18 they are children of Iluvatar, he proclaimed them his adopted children.

  • @JohnDoe-lx3dt
    @JohnDoe-lx3dt 2 роки тому +1

    Aren’t the barrow wights just Dunadain that had died and then been reanimated and cursed by the witch king while he controlled angmar?

  • @ilumi421
    @ilumi421 2 роки тому +1

    sometimes ignorance is bliss I will never take the uruk hai seriously again

  • @sbentsen2714
    @sbentsen2714 2 роки тому +1

    I remember in the Ralph Bakshi LOTR film, the Balrog was not nearly as tall as Jackson's version, much more accurate to the books. I remember thinking that it should be larger, but I'll trust Tolkien's vision 🙏🏼👌🏼

  • @michaelmeech9743
    @michaelmeech9743 3 роки тому +1

    hi i am so happy you have kept going, love the content and the new channel name. Carry on the good work!

  • @UnswimmingFishYT
    @UnswimmingFishYT 2 роки тому +2

    I would actually put Ungoliant somewhere closer to 40 or 50 feet, as eating a tree would require a massive body to be possible, and being larger afterward would mean over 30 when considering common tree heights. Ungoliant was also large enough that it took a bunch of Balrogs to fight her off, which means she was much larger than them, most likely. However, Shelob being large enough to devour a human must make her bigger than something like a horse, but she was supposed to be smaller than her mother. Considering this, I'd guess Shelob was actually sized rather accurately in the movie version.
    On the Balrog, I was trying to figure out a height a few months ago, and since Gothmog was supposed to be the strongest one, being the largest doesn't seem unreasonable. Then you have Gandalf and Glorfindel both actually fighting them with their swords, which has to mean, that although large, it would need to be at least close enough to human height for sword dueling to be possible, making me think 10 foot Balrogs would be more realistic. It would still be plenty large enough to scare most men into fleeing, and make fighting one very difficult, even aside from their status as Maiar and accompanying powers, but not so large that Glorfindel, prior to being given unusual levels of strength, could still possibly withstand the force of their attacks without just collapsing.
    Gothmog being 12 feet still makes complete sense with the information available on him, but I personally just always thought of him as larger than usual, similar to how orc leaders and human kings often are in Tolkien's world.

    • @balloonman257
      @balloonman257 2 роки тому

      Did she eat the tree? I thought she drained their life sap from them. Not debating your argument I just had thought she sucked them dry

    • @UnswimmingFishYT
      @UnswimmingFishYT 2 роки тому

      @@balloonman257 It's been a long time since I read it, so it could be either way, but I remembered it as her eating them. Either way, she'd certainly be huge, with it taking 10 Balrogs to drive her off.

  • @KaneAsIAm
    @KaneAsIAm 3 роки тому +2

    Good stuff! I was looking forward to watching this.

  • @HuP1111
    @HuP1111 3 роки тому +2

    Just read LOTR / The Fellowship... recently & still have the rest to go, including Silmarillion... but, excellent graphics, presentation, & logic (the boom-doom creature from the depths of Moria 'might' be a little bigger / maybe seem bigger due to smoke & flame around it, but definitely smaller than as shown in the movie). :)

  • @theLore-Master
    @theLore-Master 2 роки тому

    Hey TBS, thought I would weigh in on this one. OK, MERP LOTR is based on research of Tolkien, and they site their sources at the bottom of their character descriptions. I don't know if you have access to these but they are out of print and go for $200 per copy (their are several books). They are Canon and are the greatest aide to Tolkien Lore. Love you guys/gals, but Error 1 is the size of Balrogs. Ecthelion slayed Gothmog, and Echthelion was a Noldo Elf standing at 7'3". Tolkien says that Gothmog stood at least twice his height...this means Gothmog was at least 15 feet and 16' is even possible. Error 2, Sauron. He is described as twice the height of a man (6ft in Tolkiens world which is described many times). This means Sauron is about 12 feet. Error 3; Ancalagon- the towers he crushed under his "ruin" don't require a 1,000 foot dragon (the size of an aircraft carrier). The towers were on mountains, so the ruin often cited gets mixed up with destroying the mountain as well...not accurate. Ancalagon was struck from the air and fell...so even a dragon the size of Glaurung, falling from a few hundred feet or more, would cause great damage to a "dark-ages" built tower in Tolkiens world. Wingspans in these creatures are ofetn twice body length, so was Ancalagon big in wingspan- YES, but remember, he was successfully attacked by eagles as well (and damaged) so 15' eagles with 30' wingspans (canon), could not have harmed a dragon the size of a flying aircraft carrier. If Glaurung is Chinese like (long and snake-like (canon), I agree the 150-200' rang is plausible. He was a least twice that of Smaug at 60' (canon). So, since Ancalagon was the greatest of all dragons, in scale proportion to the eagles (who could wound him) and Glaurung, Ancalagon was around 300' (football field) with a 600' wingspan. Error 4; Beorn, the comment below is correct about Beorns knees and the hobbit. One/third of a humanoid's height is from the ground to the knee. However Tolkien says "between his knees", not under the knees. Still, proportionally speaking, this pits Beorn at 10 feet, and Tolkien says he was greater as a bear (canon), therefore, Grizzlies can be 11-14 feet and that's where I put him. Nothing I've researched indicates or intimates that Beorn would have been bigger than a balrog. Morgoth was 50', several times the height of a man _several is 7,8,9 times so he was bewteen 42 and 54'. You say you like averages, ok- Morgoth was 50'.

  • @evancondon1372
    @evancondon1372 3 роки тому +4

    Keep it up guys u will rise again

  • @dylanjordan72
    @dylanjordan72 Рік тому

    Hey honestly thanks for being closer to the lore

  • @Caffeine_And_Seawater
    @Caffeine_And_Seawater 3 роки тому +1

    Great video. My only critique is that within the elves I’m sure the Noldor were considered the tallest, and I can’t find the quote at the moment, but I’m sure the Numenoreans were considered close in height to them, while the wood elves were considered smaller, about the same height as men on average

    • @Crafty_Spirit
      @Crafty_Spirit 3 роки тому

      I think the Vanyar were even taller than the Noldor, the latter being close to 2 metres in their prime and not 6 feet (though I'm only like 75% certain). But I really think that some Numenoreans, especially the ones with royal blood, were the tallest children of Ilúvatar

  • @annaroselarsen4218
    @annaroselarsen4218 3 роки тому +3

    Awesome!!!

    • @TheBrokenSword
      @TheBrokenSword  3 роки тому +3

      :D :D

    • @annaroselarsen4218
      @annaroselarsen4218 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheBrokenSword y'all just made my day so much better today been a mordor day before I saw you video I have missed your weekly and so excited to have you back!

  • @Kai0nTheMoon
    @Kai0nTheMoon 2 роки тому

    Short orcs? Tiny Balrog? Talking trees only 14 feet? Damn. Very glad this was all changed for the films.

  • @88badziew88
    @88badziew88 2 роки тому +1

    I feel like I exceeded my life limits of multiplying by 30 after watching this video

  • @ac4th371
    @ac4th371 3 роки тому +1

    Ancalagon was the size of a mountain according to its description and a Balrog is 3 times the size of man with Gothmog being 4 times. Glaurung was larger in girth and not so long (think more like an iguana than snake) otherwise I'd pretty much agree with the rest.

    • @dragonhelmofdor-lomin4017
      @dragonhelmofdor-lomin4017 3 роки тому

      Nowhere in the book does it say that Ancalagon was the size of a mountain. We only know that he was the greatest of the winged dragons of Morgoth, mightiest of the dragon-host, killed by Eärendil, and that his death destroyed the peaks of Thangorodrim.

  • @jonathonfrazier6622
    @jonathonfrazier6622 3 роки тому +2

    The Nazgul were probally all over 6 foot.

  • @dmstantastic3653
    @dmstantastic3653 3 роки тому +1

    I have always wondered if the Balrog in moria was a rival to Sauron as the balrogs served Morgoth fanatically.

  • @cu1tc1assic
    @cu1tc1assic 2 роки тому

    2:52 Must be a level 45 orc, this mans has a daedric shield.

  • @Paulafan5
    @Paulafan5 3 роки тому +1

    A massive dragon falling would be like a cannonball and destroy a much larger area than the size of the dragon. I'm guessing that Ancalagon would only have to be a small percentage of the size of the mountain he "ruined". Even 500 feet long, that would severely damage a mountain if it fell from any real height.

  • @pacrat6271
    @pacrat6271 2 роки тому +1

    I feel Peter makes many things larger just so the height of dwarves and hobbits are just that much more noticeable

  • @JanjayTrollface
    @JanjayTrollface 3 роки тому

    Talks about elves, shows a man. My niggling skepticism wins out and I doubt anything else said.

  • @dpslfg
    @dpslfg 3 роки тому

    It may not be a creature, but Sam's heart is bigger than any being in Middle-Earth.

  • @leestewart72
    @leestewart72 3 роки тому +2

    Shelob appears much larger in LoTR because you only ever see her next to Frodo and Sam. If put by a human, her scale would be pretty close to yours.

    • @jayc5555
      @jayc5555 Рік тому

      That's what I was going to say.
      Shelob would looked half the size next to legolas or aragon.

  • @karenknicely1788
    @karenknicely1788 2 роки тому

    The watcher in the water, reminds me of the eye of the beholder from D&D.

  • @smithsanity2727
    @smithsanity2727 3 роки тому +1

    I wish you would have added the size of Morgoth and Sauron when they were at their greatest forms. It’s a great video nonetheless!

    • @vitalguillin1177
      @vitalguillin1177 3 роки тому

      It's written than Sauron was taller than the biggest numenorians, but not so much, so, we can guess he was maybe just over 2 meters high (2,20-2,30 m) in his "human form", so, Morgoth would be between 3-4 meters only...

  • @derrickstorm6976
    @derrickstorm6976 3 роки тому

    Those Rohirrim illustrations are superb 🤩

  • @natnut2008
    @natnut2008 3 роки тому +1

    Why are you denying the actual words used to describe Ancalagon's size. How would a 1000ft dragon break 3 mountains??? It's obvious the dragon is of similar size to the 3 mountains combined.

    • @waynepurcell6058
      @waynepurcell6058 2 роки тому

      Look at it like this, a nuclear warhead may just be 5 feet long and 500 pounds but look what it does when the energy it contains is released. It could be the same for Ancalagon, it could be all his valar given energy being released upon death. Remember even the relatively small balrog "BROKE THE MOUNTAINSIDE where he smote it in his ruin". Mountainsides don't "break" because of something a little more than twice the size of a man impact it. There has to be more to it than just weight and impact. Mass amounts of energy being released fits the bill pretty good.

  • @stephenhill6003
    @stephenhill6003 3 роки тому +1

    Well done. Where do we think Sauron would have fit in?

  • @themydnighthour
    @themydnighthour 3 роки тому +1

    Nice work!

  • @glenncrawford9606
    @glenncrawford9606 2 роки тому

    You did a great job

  • @Mariana---
    @Mariana--- 3 роки тому

    AH! How I missed you guys! Excellent video!

  • @alexyates4933
    @alexyates4933 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the video! This was a topic that always interested me.

  • @fabianjudex8980
    @fabianjudex8980 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for All your Research and heartblood u give into thoose incredible Videos...I am a big Fan since the HotA Was getting Bigger
    Lord of the Rings Was the Trilogy i "read" when i used to sleep on the streets plus the Films are very well Made
    I just want to take a minute to imagine ehat These two guys behind TBS are searching for Informationen and get These incredibles Pictures from All over the World to give us Information, fun and love to ur beloved Charakters
    Thank u Guys and best Greez from Vienna 🤜❤🤛

    • @fabianjudex8980
      @fabianjudex8980 2 роки тому

      and please excuse me the grammar, my keyboard is on german and my englisch is not the best...but i think u may understand the message (:

  • @tristan9648
    @tristan9648 3 роки тому +2

    9k already!

    • @TheBrokenSword
      @TheBrokenSword  3 роки тому +3

      :D BROHIRRIM!!!

    • @tristan9648
      @tristan9648 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheBrokenSword the Brohirrim will stand strong with you until the end :)

    • @fabiomarangoni2413
      @fabiomarangoni2413 3 роки тому +1

      Those still only count as one

  • @_semih_
    @_semih_ 3 роки тому +2

    3:15 what's the name of the background music?

  • @danielchan9556
    @danielchan9556 3 роки тому

    I wish they would make a movie about aome of the lore its unbelievably fascinating

  • @romansochacki7678
    @romansochacki7678 2 роки тому

    Honestly thought Orcs were about as tall as men but quite a bit stronger. Also thought that dwarves were around 5 ft tall. I'm 6'1 barefoot and standing military straight. Unless Tolkien wrote otherwise, that's hardly average height. Great video.

  • @kotarojujo2737
    @kotarojujo2737 3 роки тому +1

    so, glaurung should have same size as godzilla in the last movie ( Godzilla vs kong) at max

  • @yasutakaimai157
    @yasutakaimai157 23 дні тому

    Uin the Whale and Turtle Fish are worth mentioning.

  • @Amondil1
    @Amondil1 3 роки тому +1

    I would think that the elves would be taller than the Numenorians. I also don't think the trolls would be bigger than the Balrogs.

    • @kauetadaieski3131
      @kauetadaieski3131 2 роки тому

      Maybe the Noldor were somewhat taller but the Eldar in general and Numenoreans were of the same height.

  • @tathemrelag3123
    @tathemrelag3123 3 роки тому +1

    I disagree with a few of the sizes for this.
    1. I think the Orcs and Uruk-hai are both about a foot shorter than you suggested.
    2. I don't recall the Olog-hai being described as lesser in stature than other trolls, though 9ft as a low end estimate does seem reasonable to me.
    3. The Mumakil are also called Oliphaunts, which is derived from the word olifants, an Old English spelling of "elephants." As such, I suspect they're not much bigger than modern elephants, probably between 13ft tall (the size of a large African bush elephant) and 17ft tall (the high-end estimate for the size of the Asian straight-tusked elephant, the largest land mammal to ever live). Since the smaller Asian elephant was historically ridden into battle, I don't think the Mumakil would need to be larger than that to carry the howdahs of the Haradrim.

  • @mevb
    @mevb 3 роки тому +1

    You got the term for the oliphaunt wrong. It's A Mumâk and SEVERAL Mumakíl.

  • @SageKronsell
    @SageKronsell 3 роки тому

    If nothing else I agree with Ancalagon. He did break the peaks of Thangorodrim but those were slag heaps basically. Raised from the detritus of Morgoths forges, and, while solid enough to hang Maedhros from, they wouldn't have been as solid as the actual iron mountains.
    So the fall from high up of a 1000 foot and MANY tons heavy dragon combined with the titanic forces already being released during the final battle (It did sink Beleriand after all) I feel that explains that better than he was beyond reason big. Also why Ëarendil and the crew of the Vingilot could kill the big fella'. Even with a Silmaril for backup.
    Regarding Balrogs: they were corrupted Maia. Its not impossible they had SOME of their old shape change and manipulation that all Maia had to "go unformed" and come back. So yeah. 8-12 feet, (possibly variable) seems logical, especially if Gothmog was bigger than average, which makes sense based on him being the greatest of Morgoths warleaders.
    The only one I'm missing is Ungoliant, but I suppose she, like the Ainur are so ephemeral regarding size that its impossible to make a proper estimate.
    Maybe a Fellbeast, but I think Jackson hit those pretty well.

  • @emilyvalentine4565
    @emilyvalentine4565 3 роки тому

    An 18 meter length for Smaug would make sense based on the painting in the books, but if I'm not mistaken Tolkien once wrote that the figure seen in that painting is significantly larger than Bilbo; if you'd take that to mean it is the average height of a man, as Smaug presumably would imagine Bilbo to look much like a man, you would have a much larger dragon.

    • @dragonhelmofdor-lomin4017
      @dragonhelmofdor-lomin4017 2 роки тому

      Smaug's size is hinted in the novel; he was unable to fit his whole head and jaws through the secret passageway, described as "Five feet high the door and three may walk abreast."

  • @lossig1634
    @lossig1634 2 роки тому +1

    No goblins, Tom bombadil, Sauron, Morgoth, the valor, the maiar, or wizards?

  • @therealelderking5830
    @therealelderking5830 3 роки тому

    The fact that the planet Venus is boat-sized in Middle-earth is kinda hilarious.

  • @rick7424
    @rick7424 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing list. Very discriptive.
    However, the dragon of the War of Wrath was not mentioned.

    • @zionthedragon8866
      @zionthedragon8866 3 роки тому

      *Dragons
      and I would say between or around glarung's size as a close estimate.

  • @olivertaylor6097
    @olivertaylor6097 2 роки тому

    Would've liked to have seen Sauron and Morgoth in here. Is there a heroes and villains size comparison?