Maratha Empire Family Tree | Hindu Dynasties
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- Download the PDF (free):
cdn.shopify.co...
Odd Compass Channel (Indian History):
/ @oddcompass
The Life & Times of Malik Ambar:
• The Slave Who Defeated...
Mughal Emperors Family Tree:
• Video
CREDITS:
Chart/Script: Matt Baker
Narration/Editing: @JackRackam
Intro animation: @AlMuqaddimahYT
Intro music: "Lord of the Land" by Kevin MacLeod and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0. Available from incompetech.com
As a Maharashtra-ian ( Marathi ) Person , I would really like to thank you for making this Video and providing the PDF of the Chart for free. My parents told me that our ancestors were in the Navy of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, so this video means a lot me. Lot of love and Respect from Mumbai .
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
@@yogeshjog6072 True
Where is the pdf??please answer for an Indian
Link is in the description.
@ferzy09 no buddy
Shahu claims throne in 1707 , that time
balaji visjwanath bhat is just a clerk of dhanaji jadhao(who became senapati of shahu)
Bhat is made peshwa only in 1713.
*So he has grown his prominence slowly from 1711* until then he is a very good servant to dhanaji son , but indirectly serving/showing skills to shahu.
He was worthy of shahu's praise which gives jealousy to dhanaji jadhav son, n that's why all the drama upto him being peshwa in 1713 unfolds.
He in his lifetime(1720), or his great warrior son bajirao in his lifetime(1740) *had no de facto power over cchatrapati shahu*
All they had was absolute confidence of their master n relatively free hand(subject to smart checks n balances of shahu) to deal/expand as if they are rulers.
N they both never dreamt of superseding shahu.
Fantastic video! Glad to be involved in presenting Indian history to the world.
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Went to ur channel cannot find vdo which is bout shahuji sharifji n Sufi
@@yogeshjog6072 Hey Yogesh, I think you may have mistakenly replied to me instead of UsefulCharts.
@ferzy09 no boy.. shahu was never titular.
Inactive militarily (like sambhaji shivaji rajaram maharaj was) but he never had a de facto ruler overpowering his authority as maratha king until he died.
Will explain later in longer comment with exact relation of peshwa shahu with possibly reference links. With each of bhat peshwa 3 in his life.
@@OddCompass it's my view on this vdo sir.
I wish it be read by many interested history lovers, so I paste in major threads.
List of Marathi dynasties:
Holkars of Indore
Shindes of Gwalior
Gaikwads of Baroda
Bhonsales of Nagpur
Pawars of Dhar
Patwardhans of Phaltan
Bhoites of Jalgaon
Newalkars of Jhansi
Peshwa dynasty
@@nilekarmayur No, they were pretty much maratha dynasties
Patwardhan...of Phaltan....what do u mean....what period of their ruling
These were those who allied with british. Bhonsles of Tanjore or Those of Satara fought the british and lost.
Shinde dynasty is still alive
While in the Air Force, I was in Gwalior India for two weeks. We got to visit the Maharaja palace which is more of a museum now. They had a dining room with a silver liquor train that ran over the table. They had a two ton chandelier hanging in the ball room. The legend was that the Maharaja had two elephants walk on the ceiling to make sure it could hand the chandelier. It was amazing!
Where do you live sir ?
@@aakarshmaurya2265 I live in North Dakota USA. I was in the USAF for 20 years and attended a Cope India at Gwalior AB India.
@yeh koi IMRANdi KHANa hai ?? Oh beti fauji fauji hota hai chahe wo yha ka ho ya mitra desh ka.
Apne desh ke seniko ka samman zaroor karo aur dusre desho ke seniko ka bhi.
Pakistan is an exception 😁.
Ab Sir ka mtlb izzat se talve chaatna kab ho gya
Still you can see the Maharajas of Gwalior, they made their palace a museum and now constructed a new palace...
🚩Long live Chatrapati Maharaj Shivaji Bhosle🚩🚩🚩
🌹🌹🌹🙏
🇳🇵Love from Nepal !!!
Marathas has to be only empire which was caste neutral. All castes like Rajputs, Brahmins, Dalits etc came together to achieve Swaraj.
Castes comes when British rule start, it was Jaati and it is very different from cast.
That is not true. The Marathas after Balaji were really racist idiots. That's why so many other "hindu" kingdoms ended up supporting the Afghans instead of the Marathas who did not respect their independence.
That was only true till Chhatrapati rule
After Peshwas took over casteism touched new heights in the Maratha Empire
@@abhishekpawar5126 lol. Brahmin bashing . 😂
@@adwaitnaravane5285 u hate that peshwas took Maratha Empire to its zenith. So u want to descredit them only because they are Brahmins
It's great to see doing Indian families. Love from India.
same
Jai Maratha
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
I Respect Marathi people .
I am an tamizhan.
As a Maratha n marathi we don't respect periyari tamizhan ricebags
@@cr-mo1op respect the cholas then
We are Marathi but we are also Indian proud of Indian.
@@cr-mo1op periyar moment Tamil Nadu fought for the cast system
@@ashwinvk4124 😂😂😂 that’s what your people say? He was British agent, anti Hindu n Google it what he said about Tamil language n what his followers did to Hindu gods. N we know what he did to his own foster child.
Happy to learn Maratha royal family tree by you 💙. This is also very useful for Indian competitive exams 😉. Love you from 🇮🇳🇮🇳
My ancesters are from holkars, was one of the state in maratha empire. You didn't added them in chart 😁
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Yeah holkars ruled indore
@Rupesh Thakare tera baap deshdrohi
Yes🙏👍👍👍👍😄
@Rushabh Thakare.Thakur
Kon desh drohi
It's a bit sad that there was no mention of Rani Laxmibai but otherwise, great vid!
@Bricp she was also a maratha and part of maratha Confederacy.
@Bricp even peshwa bajirao, gawkawad of baroda, scindia of gwalior and holkar of indore were not descendants of Shivaji Maharaj. All these dynasties were part of Maratha Confederacy aka Maratha empire with Shivaji Maharaj's descendants at Satara as their nominal emperor.
i dont see you mentioning Christian nationalist or Islamist/muslim nationalist in any of your video about Muslims or Christian empires nor have i seen you mention ethnonalionalist then how is "Hindu nationalist" relevant to this?
Typical westerner
Jack: Europe is connected to Asia.
Me: laughs in British Isles
*laughs in Iceland*
Britain and Ireland are on the continental shelf of Europe. Much as Long Island (and Greenland) are on the continental shelf of North America.
We are still in Europe! Europe and EU are different!صلاح محمد الجعلي
@@renshiwu305 Well done, very true.
British Isles are on the Eurasian tectonic plate but India has its own plate.
I couldn't understand why few marathas faught for the throne, if they stayed united all the time India would have been something else. But thanks for explaining ❤️❤️
I am indian and watch every single one of your videos I was very happy when I saw u uploaded a indian royal dynasty
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Thank you for making so informative video on Hindu Royals Dynasties...My ancestors were part of Maratha army for generations so this video meant a lot to me , we still have our ancestral home near Royal palace and Kings court also known as JUNA RAJWADA BHAWANI MANDAP here in Kolhapur...
Lot of love and Respect from Kolhapur 🚩🚩🚩
Jay Bhawani Jay Shivaji 🚩🚩🚩
Shivaji: Save, Maratha!
Mughals: Why did you say that name!
Baburids great imperia
@@greattimurempire7596 mongols were defeated by Marathas
@@Noone-gz8li marathas were defeated by british empire
@@samimahmood5877 British Empire only defeated Marathas at the end, however most wars between the British and Maratha consisted of Maratha victories.
The Indian monarchical titles were not done away with in 1947. They were abolished under PM Indira Ghandi. From 1947 the titles and honours (like the 21 gunshot salute) remained until then, but in 1947 the power of these monarchs was mostly done away with. There were a few exeptions. But not anymore.
Holkars of Indore, Bhosles of Nagpur and Bhosles of Thanjavur have not been covered at all in the so called Useful Charts.
I think Holkars were also the part of maratha dynasty you missed them 😊
Holkars are not Maratha by Caste.
@@pankajkumarswain4855 there was nothing like maratha as a cast.. it was made up to divide forces during british occupation. As for Holkar family, Malharrao holkar was originally from place near pune region (होळ). And he was part of Maratha empire. Most important one leading northen expansion.
Peswa-maratha
Shinde-kunbi
Holkar-dhangar
@@pandit_thanos5135 peshwa were bramhin and shinde and holkars were maratha
@@pankajkumarswain4855 holkars are maratha bro
There is an error on the chart
Venkoji is shown as Shahaji's brother, he is not. He is Shahaji's son from his other wife Tukabai and he is Shivaji's half brother
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
@@yogeshjog6072 no offence,but the Peshwa and generals run the show since the 2nd Peshwa.
Paste-
Shahu claims throne in 1707 , that time
balaji visjwanath bhat is just a clerk of dhanaji jadhao(who became senapati of shahu)
Bhat is made peshwa only in 1713.
*So he has grown his prominence slowly from 1711* until then he is a very good servant to dhanaji son , but indirectly serving/showing skills to shahu.
He was worthy of shahu's praise which gives jealousy to dhanaji jadhav son, n that's why all the drama upto him being peshwa in 1713 unfolds.
He in his lifetime(1720), or his great warrior son bajirao in his lifetime(1740) *had no de facto power over cchatrapati shahu*
All they had was absolute confidence of their master n relatively free hand(subject to smart checks n balances of shahu) to deal/expand as if they are rulers.
N they both never dreamt of superseding shahu.
@@cs-mi8ur no offence taken bro.
Yes they run the show from 3rd bhat peshwa. But Surely not second.
I've pasted detailed comment no 2. Hope u read.
I can also narrate u another incidence, where peshwa 3 and bhosale of nagpur come at cross at ganga river over who is authority to revenue collections in Bengal.
Where *shahu grants east (orrisaa Bengal) to nagpur bhosale* circa 1745-50. (Gotta read for exact dates, and exact episode again.)
And *peshwa since then keeps away from Bengal* (even after shahu dies further peshwas n pune *never cross nagpur rights in east* .)
Just Imagine brother what happened if Shambhaji shahaji Bhosle and Shambhaji maharaj completed their term , I think Bhosle Dynasty had more Fame in history .
I'm early for once! Just wanted to say, I have always loved how Usefulcharts covers a lot of history and family trees from all over the world and from many different cultures. It's good to see, and I wish we didn't have such Euro/white-centric history in the classroom.
The505Guys It’s not to say other countries’ histories aren’t important, or that we shouldn’t learn them. However it would be ludicrous to say that a “Eurocentric” point of view doesn’t make sense, given how the future USA was settled and developed by Europeans.
@@Zach-mw5so That's a funny spin on "built on Native genocide and African slavery". Comments like this just prove the point that everything we teach our kids is filtered through a European lens.
TsovLoj Not even worth a debate with comments like that.
Baburids great Empire
@@tsovloj6510 and they might want to learn there own european history
Quiet a good research, being a maratha loved it personally
Yeah ..bhari video ahe..pn he log mahabhart time cha United bharat mention ka kart nahit
Lol that's why I hate em maratha is cast and all cast help him to build empire but in return they get shit and only one racing cast takes credit
@@bestclips4525 before Shivaji maharaj , their was no marathi caste, people used to say that but in history their was not a single time mentioned about Maratha name .
And about saint and educational base , saint dnyaneshwar ,to saint aknath spirtual books ,in that book all caste mentioned except Maratha.
Maratha is like a battalion , fighter caste .even tho not all todays Maratha did not participate as a mawala with ahivaji maharaj , few of them ,in that area with CH shivaji maharaj
@@bestclips4525 par chutiye Tumhe kuch pata nahi hai maratha sena mein ladhne wale 80% jawan farmer the jo aaj maratha hai Farmers.. 20 percent baki caste thi Jisme baki kam karne wale the
Hey, You should definitely make a video on the Nepali royal dynastys Shahs being the kings and Ranas being a hereditary prime Minister dyanasty. You should also include the 3 malla dynasties that ruled Kathmandu before the Gurkha Shahs took over. It would be a really interesting video. The royal family ended in 2007 but really in 2000 when the royal massacre happened.
Please reply if you plan to make a video. I'll email you useful information and details.
Thanks 😊 🙏 😊
Ranas of nepal also migrated frm mewar
Fun fact : Bajirao's son Shamsher Bahadur was a muslim because his mother came from a muslim family and he was born before their marriage so the people did not recognise his legitimacy ,his original name was to be krishna but instead he became Shamsher Bahadur
It's not fun fact, Infact you are trying to hurt Muslims sensitive.
Shameful hindu politics.
@@ahmeddf97 how is that disrespectful if anything this shows how many indian ruler were secular and were fighting against religious discrimination
Abhishek Raj
Mastani, Bajirao's 2nd wife was born to a Hindu rajput Raja and his persian concubine.
@@muraligopal212 she wasn't Persians just a Muslim from ganges plains decedent of a persio-turk family that settled in north India.
Then why didn't you make this Chart before ........if you have degdeep facts about the same....
Holkar, Tanjaur Bhosale are missing. Holkar were equally important to Shinde and more prominent than Gaekwads of Baroda.
We are the bhosale of Thanjavur clans but we don't know our history now
THE GREAT MARATHA
Point of Information: Yuvraj Sambhajiraje Chatrapati is the current Chatrapati of the Kolhapur branch, he is an Indian politician with the BJP who served as the member in the upper house of the Parliament of India.
Well presented , appreciate the effort to pronounce names properly. Kindly consider couple of points when updating the version :
a) True India was a collection of kingdoms, but unlike Europe the kingdoms were bound by common civilisational ethos based on sanatana dharma. Hence any internecine wars wete more a territorial issue for kings and hence common people and their life were largely unaffected .
b) Pluralism had never worried hindus, but the Islam's assault and forced conversion was not accepted. Marathas definitely stood for hindus and their culture , but as unique people in the world the hindu marathas like the hindu Vijayanagar before them , never oppressed or differentiated their subjects on religious grounds nor inflicted genocide on the enemy's people that the Islam and European colonial armies used to do
C) it is not correct to term Mughals as tolerant to hindus. It is just the extent of resistance they faced that made them compromise and do with subtle aggression like jezia tax , buying out some enemies, fostering marriage based alliance etc. Ofcourse Aurangazeb carried out unabashed atrocity on hindus.
He only said the early Mughals were more tolerant than the later ones. That's true.
Are Holkars of Indore not part of maratha/shivaji dynasty like scindia and gaikwad
Its amazing how foreigners are slowing showing interest in Indian history..............just like we Indians were studying napolean, bismark, russian tzars and Hitler till now.
@General Zorawar Singh yes they do ...we studied them in history ww2 chapter
@General Zorawar Singh CBSE class 10th
Very detailed and most updated version till date....... Great job !!
Love and respect from Pune ( De Facto capital of Maratha Empire !!)
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
A slave from Africa
Became a King in India
In his army was a Sardar
Whose Grandson initiated an Empire
An Empire that later ruled the whole of India
This is so fascinating ❤
Greatest comment.
You should do a family tree on Vanderbilt's! They have many modern interesting descendents like Anderson Cooper and Timothy Oliphant
Love From India-Maharashtra n Maratha Family 👍 Gud Work
My ancestors came from Parmar Dynasty ( Rajasthan). Brought to Mumbai by King Bimb of Mumbai in 3rd AD as soldiers.Later fought for Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj against Mughals.Our surname was Dalpati. Chatrapati renamed our new surname as Dalvi for a bravery in a battlefield. Today our caste family is known as Shatriya Chaukalshi Samaj.
1 mistake: India was unified 2 times only under 1 ruler but idea of 1 India is very old. That's the reason 1 of our 2 epics is Mahabharat. Meaning great india. Culturally & by our values & traditions bases we were always 1.
Rest liked the lecture a lot❤️😘👌🏼
Chattrapati wasn't rajput he claimed as rajput but wasnt.
Technically, Madhavrao Scindia's mother is from a Nepali noble house, but not the royal house. The Rana dynasty were hereditary Prime Ministers during the Nepali monarchy era. The royal house was the Shah dynasty.
2:54 the “claim” was actually quite legitimate and was proven from the records of the earlier Bahamani Sultanate, where Shivaji’s ancestors(Sisodiyas) served and got fiefs.. the same Sisodiyas later became the clan of Bhosales along with a sub-clan called Ghorpades. This claim was bolstered when the complete lineage from Bahamani times to the previous times was traced and Coronation of Shivaji Maharaj took place
@Rupesh Thakare yes
Absolutely right
Fake lol shivaji maharaj was kurmi. 96 kuli itself came after original marathas. First all were known as mawalas. Sisodiya rajput ka claim liya tha but wasn't rajput and moreover history of shivaji maharaj is written far later after the 2nd coronation 🤣🤣🤣
@@zorathus2229 Correct, that is the reason why Marathas got put in Reservation category in Maharashtra in 2019. Marathas are not Kshatriya Varna but Shudra Varna. The fake genealogy was created for Shivaji because the Chhatrapati religious ceremony can be done only for Kshatriyas, also Sisodia family were the only Rajputs who didn't intermarry with the Mughals.
Yes.
All that is fine...but i can't connect Sisodia dynasty to martha...because i myself comes from sisodia clan....and sysodia dynasty was the rulers of Mewar...so how can a rajputi dynasty connected to marthas....i think he is right to that dynasty made connections to legitimize their rule.....
The royal titles were abolished in 1971. So, technically from 1947 to 1971, they were the equivalent of mediatised houses
A suggestion, if I may. Do not do a video on Solar and Lunar dynasties for the reason that most probably you will get it wrong for there are more than 100 versions of it. I will suggest that you first try to understand the cultural differences and understand that History in India is not understood and applied as is understood by Western development and hence 'History' is different from 'Itihasa' (the preferred translation), however in exactitude the better word would be 'Bhoot' which translates as 'Past' since the concepts are entirely different.
Marathas are fine, being nearer in History, but since even Indians are unsure of the right version of the claimed Solar and Lunar dynasties you certainly won't be able to figure it out and hence i would suggest you to not pursue it.
I will mostly be looking at the family tree of the characters from the Mahabharata and Ramayana, not trying to build a complete historical tree. In these videos, I just explain the family tree rather than do historical analysis.
@@UsefulCharts Thank you for clearing that up.
It should be relatively easier for the lineage of Major characters of these texts are mentioned in the texts themselves as opposed to the mammoth task which I thought you were to undertake.
However, there is another catch. The dates that are proposed for the events of these texts are under contention and rightly so and therefore you will have to navigate around that problem or use a disclaimer.
I wish you good luck.
And good job with this video. Thank You.
@@kuldeepgaurav1419 Thanks. Will probably just avoid dates altogether.
@@kuldeepgaurav1419 You are right about it.
@@UsefulCharts I agree ..... And plus u could spiritually hurt some people..... With rebirth or not a big issue in Indian Mythology
two Great king
maharana pratap Singh
and chatrapati shivaji maharaj both come from sisodiya rajput.. means thay both suryavanshi.. means both are part of Femily of greatest king ram... i think for build unity in hindus. thay started maratha clean means who fight for indipendent(swaraj) thay called maratha. and chatrapati shivaji maharaj become greatest maratha.
i am so happy after geting this information because just think. blood of god ram saved hindus many time...
🚩jay shree ram
And *I m descendant* of
Sujanpur kingdom
Which
Was of Kangra kingdom
And
Which was biggest Rajputana kingdom of HIMALAYAN India 😂😂😂
Means *I m lost 🤴 Prince*
Sujanpur punjab was a kingdom?🤣
No mughal was tolerant to hindus. Just some were less destructive doesn't mean he was tolerant.
Marathas, Gupta, Ashoka, Maurya, Harsha💪 pride of India.
So where are gehlots rana sisodiya chandel bundel kalchuri parmar rajput katoch porus gaur sen kshatriya rajputra chauhan solanki chalukya rajput and prathihar rajputs
There is a bit of inaccuracy. Early and later mughal rule was pretty brutal, only Akbar, jahangir and shah jahan to some extent were considered somewhat tolerant, further the earlier Islamic sultante was along with nearly all of early islamic invasions were quite horrific as well. Some say it was the bloodiest of invasions.
Thank you very much UsefulCharts! Your team is doing very informative work. Schools in India (and the world) would be happy to have you as their history teacher.
Basically there is no maratha raja left who has direct blood connection with shivaji maharaj? After many adoption...direct blood line is lost.
@Reeshi Tas yes, see the map and number of adoptions .
As an American-Born Marathi, I'm happy to learn about Marathi history other than Shivaji and Bajirao
Chhatrapati Shivaji was a contemporary of the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, who is renowned as a Muslim puritan since stopped patronising arts on religious grounds. Aurangzeb was incredibly harsh on Hindus since he had reintroduced jizya(additional taxes paid by non-Muslims living under Muslim rule that had been abolished by his great-grandfather Akbar), ordered the desecretion of various Hindu shrines of pilgrimage, demolished Hindu temples & erected mosques on those sites, banned Hindus from publicly observing their rituals like celebrating Holi & bathing in the holy river Ganga and prohibited construction of new Hindu temples. Shivaji was the most popular face of resistance against Aurangzeb amongst the Hindus.
Can you also look at some more south indian dynasties. Like vijayanagara, wodeyars, chola, kittur etc...? It's a real delight to know the history from your charts.
Please do videos of
1. Ranas and Shumshers of Nepal..!!!!
2. Shah Dynasty of Nepal
Thankyou So much for the PDF! I Can’t imagine people like you still exist! I am admirer of English and one day will start my own historic company!
Nice information, detailed research.
Correction in respect of two points, though -
1) India was politically divided in various parts ruled by different kings / dynasty. As Mahabharat shows, kings from entire India (including today’s Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal) were part of the Kuru empire. Ancient name of India is “Bhaarat” which mentions emperor “Bharat”. Power equations amongst kingdoms would naturally not remain constant - as such what we know is a land divided in many kingdoms. Though politically divided, India has always been unified due to “Dharma” (Dharma should not be confused with “religion”) - roughly meaning commitment / duty / objective - of a person. Dharma is not a political concept like a religion, as it doesn’t intend to gather a group nor to increase the numbers. “Hindu” is a word used relatively recently - only in differentiation with Muslims who came in since seventh century to convert and conquer.
2) Shah ji and Sharif ji were not the actual names. Shahaji’s court-chronicler has mentioned these names as “Sinh”ji and “Sharabh”ji. These are Sanskrit names of two powerful animals often mentioned in ancient texts. “Sinh” means lion, and “Sharabh” is described as a big eight-legged animal. Many sculptures in India depict these two animals. As Muslim rulers and generals / soldiers coming from middle-east and central Asia couldn’t pronounce Sanskrit words correctly - many names in India have been changed by usage. As such Sinh-ji and Sharabh-ji came to be known as “Shahaji” and “Sharifji”. The story as to these brothers being named after a Muslim saint “Shah-Sharif” is a myth. It was apparently convenient not to clarify / rectify these names - to please the rulers.
In Indian families there is a tradition of naming sons after a grandfather / great-grandfather. In The Bhonsale family, you would find a descendent (chief of the South Indian princely state of Tanjavur / Tanjore under British rule) named as "Sharabhoji" or "Sarphoji".
Where is Holkar like they are also in consideration with shindia and gaikawad dynasty
Heard about Jyotiraditya royal connection for the first time.
Great Charting for Knowledge and understanding of history
Jai Hind
Jai Maharashtra
Great to explained this chart very well with the details of Maratha and Peshwa families with the ruling period.
You missed Bhosale's of Tanjavar and another maratha Confederacy Holkar's of Indore.
@Rupesh Thakare Lol.... descendant of "Anaji"claiming to be Kshyatriya...😂😂😂
@Rushabh Thakare. kahi Pan Naka Bolu
Thank you for the information, just noticed at 08:25 the years mentioned below Baji Rao (1720-1740) is his reign, and at 09:55 Madhav Rao(1774-95) his lifespan is given
Bcoz Madhavrao was given Peshwai at 40th day of his birth and he reigned till hi death.
You missed Holkar dynasty of indore in your video...
Hey guys! Would you maybe get into the dynasties of the states in the Holy Roman Empire and subsequently the German Emprire? I think it would be a lot of fun to see all the connections, since there were quite a few of them.
BTW I had the east and west European charts framed and hanged on my wall for my birthday. I love them a lot.
Keep up the good work!
A Hungarian from Germany
maratha tree given so much in detail! Nice
Maratha Empire was founded by great shri Chhatrapati shivaji maharaj from the scratch. Then kept on expanding for next 150 years and spread all over India. The unique feature of this Empire was unlike other Indian Empires it was not run by any unique family. Those who had the capability to prove got good opportunities to hold different positions in this Empire. Hence there are a number of big names from different clans from Maharashtra those appear in the Marathas history.
Shinde s ( schindhia s ) , holkars , gaykawads , Pawar's from Maharashtra s heart land got good opportunities under the leadership of peshwas and they were assigned separate territories in the north india, Bhosale s in East - nagpur . Nagpurkar Bhosale s had their territories extended up bengal and oddisha. Rani laxmi bai was from the tambe Maharashtrian royal family from banaras and was married to the Maratha king of Jhansi.
In short there are a number of big names in maratha history who are not directly connected to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj family.
Next could you maybe do a family tree of Irish High Kings?
It would be a tough one to do as the high kings would come from many different houses (clans).
Its also tough to know when the Irish monarchy started so it would be easiest to big somewhere like 6th century or 8th century or whatever.
Just to add....
Ireland WAS a single nation back then contrary to one of your previous vidoes,
there was a single high king,
a single language, culture and religion,
A single law,
And the Irish identity in Ireland back then.
Only thing is the system was very strange and unique to otehr counties.
Simply explained....
At the top of the pyramid was the "Brehon Law". The laws of Ireland. No-one could change the laws and they were in place for hundreds and hundreds of years.
Then was the High King, he had little to no proven power but nonethless was the most powerful person.
Then was the four petty kings who ruled their small regions under the high kings, there was occasionally infighting between these kings and the high king was also one of these four regional kings.
Then there was the cheiftans of the clans, there were many clans with the petty king of the region being part of the most powerful clan in his region. These clans often infought with each other to become more powerful.
It was a very strange amd complicated system so I wouldn't expect that in the possible video at all but its just to explain.
My grandmother is from bhosale family ❤️❤️ and my grandfather from jijamata's family side ❤️❤️
Where are you from
Jyotiraditya Scindhia is really a very well versed politician . I supported him when he was with congress , I support him now as well.
Not only Hindu nationalist Muslim also love Chatrapati Shivaji
No pluralism in Islam kingdoms
It was the first empire in centuries to abolish Castism,it didn't matter what Caste you are, you are Maratha first
Sad to see this coming from a foreigner rather than our own people.. Kudos to you mate good work 👍
4:00 Wow nostalgia, Only 15th century Kids will remember
What are you talking hindu nationalists ,it sounds like contemptuous towards hindus.
Propaganda is spread this way. They use little terms or comments like Shivaji lied abt being Suryavanshi. Or like Mughals didn’t despise Hindus n killed millions. They make videos not to entertain or to earn money. A Nexus is behind all these. . . They won’t say it took Marathas to take back India from Mughals in 23 yrs when the Islamic rulers took 600 yrs to accomplish what they did at the height of Aurangzeb reign and that too it was never united. There were fight and skirmish happening everywhere. Like in kings of Kashmir or Ahoms of Assam. And they begin with the wrong Indian map. And u see not one person has objected in the comment section! This is how distorted map of India is normalised.
he is
@@r.b.8018 there is a nexus behind wahh re bhakt properly a sanghi nexus wearing chadhi with a brown ass.
Marathas had never claimed their descendants from the rajputs Or the sisodiyas, a rumor had been spread across people on this
Tq for uploading free PDF 😊
solar dynasty means suryavanshi
and lunar means somavanshi ❤️
Somavanshi aka chandravanshi. Both names are used.
Thank you so much for this video Lot of respect...Ek Maratha Lakh Maratha...🚩🚩🚩
Please Work towards being a Hindu and don't divide yourself with caste and creed.
Chatrapathi does not mean " the umbrella ruler".
"Chatrpathi" is a distorted form of " Kshetra pathi".
"Kshetra"= land, land mass, area etc
" Pathi"= lord, owner,
In india a king (Raaja) is also called as
" Bhoopathi" here bhoo means again land.
Bhoopati - lord of Lands
The 1st thing you said about mughals being tolerant to religious diversity is totally wrong they destroyed nearly 40,000 temples while their time that is why Chatrapati Shivaji Mahraj started swarajya moment to fight against their cruelty agaist hindus. Get you facts checked
5:29 It must have been Baldrick.
Best video..
Thanks for the great information 👍
Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ki jay ❤️
Very nicely elaborated. Not much is known about Shahaji (Ch. Shivaji's father) except that he was a Sardar in Malik Ambar's Court. Will look forward to the Solar (Suryavansh) & Lunar (Chandravansh) blood lines to test how various literatures portray them. The Peshwas expanded the Maratha empire for nearly 100 years however very little info is published (except a few good books) so will welcome anything on this front too.
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
Useful charts--,
👏🌹🙏 Thanks!!, the video is beautifully done!!
🇳🇵Love from Nepal !!!
Very interesting but you missed the Maharaja HOLKAR of Indore.. One of largest Maratha Princely State..
Please mughals especially Babar and Aurangzeb were never religiously tolerant 🙏
As far as the family tree of the Bhosle dynasty is concerned, the video is absolutely correct when speaking of the process of adoption. There is a litany of situations where uncles adopt their nephews, ie their sister's son. This would also bring prominence to the family that the sister was married into. Some were even descendants of Shivaji's granduncle. There is a palace called the New Palace in Kolhapur where the Bhosle family still lives but the entire ground floor has been converted into a museum. There one can see the family tree in its entirety. It is so long and convoluted that it will make your head spin!
many interpretations prejudiced. (Some facts are wrong too)
Eg.
5:49 u say "shahu maharaj became puppet of peshwas."
No!!!! until he was alive 1749, peshwas were never superseding chatra-pati.
It was only 1752-54 when peshwas instated their 1st puppet chatrapati (who was actually officially adopted n nominated by shahuji while he was alive.)
Peshwas (nanasaheb to be precise 3rd of bhat peshwa ) could exert their power over throne, only cuz of internal feud occuring post shahuji chatrapati . Thanks to tara rani (who was not reigning queen at the feud time 1749-54 neither of kolhapur nor satara)
please make video on Maurya Empire....❤ frm india
Dheeraj Shinde , I Live Today In Sangli My Ancestry Tree Goes Back From Gwalior Madhya Pradesh To Kanerkhed Satara Maharashtra I noticed this During The ( वौंशावळ) In my family tree they were In the Leading troops With Mahadji Shinde During Panipat War After One Of My Great Great Great Great Great Grandfathers who was martyred in the war The Family was Sent Back to Kanerkhed With Patilki For 2-3 Generations Later The Son Of my great great great great great grandfather Along With Mahadji Shinde With Sardarki They freed Shah Alam From Britishers and Captured Dehli And Made Shah Alam King Again As the time passed by we moved to Bhose and then to Sangli Maharashtra The family Ancestry tree and the Information is still intact with us I'm Proud that My Ancestors share a bit of Great History On back of our generation In Order To Expand the maratha empire
Along With Peshwas . हर हर महादेव 🚩
Can we get a Seleukid Family Tree! That be cool!
Wonderful Job🔥❤️❤️, Love from a Maratha❤️🔥
Important point to note is balaji roa is almost always called nanasaheb. Something to note
I am proud to be a MARATHA🚩
Is it real origin bhosale with sisodiya
Great work!
Looking forward for more
Thank You For this Video ❤️
My grandfather told me we were from *Shinde* dynasty who settle in South part of Maharashtra near Solapur. Earlier our surname was also *Shinde* but eventually changed to *Ligade* . Though people in our area still use *Sardar* before our name.
Great to know about Maratha dynasty. Studious presentation 👍
you didn't mention HOLKARS of INDORE and BHONSLES OF NAGPUR. There royalty and lineage is still going on , although they are not in politics.
It is true that Deccan is know for its cross-religion diversity. I'm a Maratha, clan-Jadhavrao/Jadhavrav from Western Maharashtra, My maternal Grandmother is from the Suryavanshi Clan from Wai, Maharashtra, it was a ritual in their family to pay homage to Sufi Shrines. Family Havelis (Wada, like Shanivar Wada in Pune(Kokansatha/Chitpavan) ) have long been abandoned but the spirit still continues till this day!
Do a video of the Monarchs of Sicily
(The Norman Sicilian Kings, the Holy Roman Rulers, The Spanish Monarchs of Sicily & the Bourbon Monarchs)
Hey Jack and OddCompass. Great video!