she went from “i obviously was driving my vehicle” to “you assumed i was operating my vehicle, correct?” lmaoo lawyer mode kicked in and came with a case of amnesia
It's all apart of her plans. She invoked her 5th amendment right and immediately continues to talk, she's trying to assert dominance over the police officer lol.
both you and the guy reacting are dumb. she was saying "you assumed i was operating my vehicle under alcohol", but since she's drunk, she forgot to add the alcohol part after saying it once... she is not trying to say that she wasn't driving.
I love how the woman just sees the police officer and immediately crosses her arms and stands next to him looking at the car like. "No clue. A mystery wrapped in a enigma. It may never be figured out"
"Maybe, if I act like the officer, he'll think I'm another cop who just happened to come along and find the scene.... yes, this is a perfect plan! Rachel, you've done it again!" - Rachel's internal monologue
I saw this on Law and Crime Network's channel the other day, and I thought she was attractive until the officer said that her breath reeked. Bad hygiene is an instant turn-off. I've had to call girls out on it before, didn't matter to me if the first date was ruined. Her car was full of clutter, so she's definitely a messy person.
Reminds me of a story of one of my friends growing up. When he was a little kid he took his caca balls and stuck them in the VCR. when his mom asked who did it, he told her Chester did it. Chester was the family dog.
As a bouncer, I love when very clearly drunk people try to sound not drunk af when they’re talking to you because you know they truly believe they’re acting completely normal
@@symbolsarenotreality4595 I like your name. there’s this theory by a Physicist named Bachelard who said symbols and poetry are deeply connected to memory. Would you consider memory to be reality / real? I see memories and symbols like a shadow or reflection of reality, but honestly idk if shadows and reflections are *real* either
While shes an idiot and deserves everything thats coming…. Alot of “law enforcement” do not understand the law and you see it in the news every day. Its both sad
I know it makes me think dealing with these kinds of people makes cops the jaded against all people. When i watch this stuff i feel bad for the cops which is super rare.😲
@@qqu1nten This is one of those situations where it's better if it doesn't go a long way. It's not like getting caught in a speed trap going 12 km/h over the limit. Not that it really matters for Rachel lol.
She's either pretending to be a lawyer or she's so drunk that she believes she's already in court and not in a cop car. A lawyer wouldn't talk to the cops, let alone start pleading her case right there, handcuffed, in the back of a cop car.
sounds like she's been listening to "Chille DeCastro" alil too much.. (Chille's STILL currently in 3rd place, for The Grifties Award btw 🏆) .. what a "Law Scholar"..
i get what you’re saying, but her defense in the car, while actively being shitfaced, is a pretty good argument. as bad as it may sound from our POV, she was actually building reasonable doubt, even while being shitface.
@@klataface Not likely, the bias in the "justice" system is outrageous. A woman or minority can literally commit murder right now and be released with no bail.
This space probably seems bigger than it is when you are consuming it. Most of us have pretty focused interests that led us here, a few million people spread across the planet seeing you fuck up sounds bad. But I’d bet few face many social consequences from this lens.
@sealboy1211 ummmm, no dude. Charlie is PLENTY to rocket her off into a social crash and burn. 80% of those who know her are aware of her mistake by now- and as much as 50% will see his commentary specifically. She was viral before, him covering means she's entered the viral history books. It's like pouring concrete on it for posterity for sure. His impact goes WELL beyond the mere number of subscribers.
@@Drakholm it’s easy to feel a space this large is “that” big. The mind can’t really visualize such numbers. You can’t really tell if a giant crowd you are in the middle of is 1000 people or ten thousand people. It’s pretty much the same in these mental spaces we congregate in. If you could somehow poll all the random ppl you pass in a day as to their knowledge of this channel, you may be surprised(perhaps it would be me, I’m not stamping my feet that you are wrong)that not many know Charlie not know of this video and that this persons life, is already as messed up by it as it will likely be. That a penguin fan would see this AND have even a small ability to punish her directly in the form of lost opportunity etc etc is extremely small. I mean to say sure it is enshrined for us, but none of this ready mix is gonna touch her feet, our perch is not so high, she might not even see us over here.
@sealboy1211 And I'm saying 2% of the people she knows could know about his channel and the trickle down effect could amount to 30% in under a week. Of course he's a hegemon in but a "small" niche/cloistered fan base. But even if his subscriber base was 2 million it would have a sizable impact. 14 million crosses several thresholds that make it exponential. But again, she was already viral before Charlie decided to reply. But look at his recent commentary on that Rubi Rose nonsense. Without his video I don't think anyone would ever know her shit was a ploy. But the internet 100% does now. And they don't have to watch his videos directly for that to be the case.
@@crankfastle8138 I assume you mean the "lawyer" was kinda right, which I disagree, I cant remember now but charlie did say she admitted to being the one driving before getting in the police's car
@@crankfastle8138 isn't that a stupid question to ask when she literally stated she was the one driving the car, it's her car and nobody's in her car beside her?
jugding by what she looks like here, i would die to see how the trial went out district attourney: _presses the button to start playing the video_ also district attourney: the people rests its case
All she had to do was say, “I’m very confused and disoriented. I think I’m injured. Can you call an ambulance?” That would have ended all questions right there and given her time to prep a story (as well as sober up at the hospital).
The line "It's a bitch when you arrest a lawyer" actually caused me physical pain from the overwhelming amount of cringe, she really thought she was megaminding the cop.
It's a pre-existing condition that every single drunk/high driver ever is utterly incapable taking accountability for anything, even when they're sober; it's just the kind of people they are.
This was obviously insane on her part, but I was in shock when she said "it's a b*tch when you arrest a lawyer" because in her head canon she genuinely believes she's owning these cops at every turn. This is possibly the worst drunk driver Charlie has ever talked about.
Besides that one lady who had driven over a bunch of people while driving drunk, resulting in deaths, and then laughing about it when being interviewed.
"There was no car on the side of the road" Into the Officer quickly flashing the light on it was so perfect that no TV show could match it's situational humor
She is obviously a victim of the most elaborate hit and run. Someone crashed into her, parked that car on the street to frame her, then ran away... obviously
She's trying to get them to say it so she can later use it in court. Some of that lawyer brain is trying to swim it's way to the top, but that beer-cocktail is just straight drowning it!😂😂😂
The start of it is already pure comedy gold. "Looks like you crashed your car, huh?" "No," she says, as she crawls out of the sunroof, "I didn't". That's the whole goddamn story right there. That's a masterclass in writing. "I parked it, sir. This is not a very wide road, you see, and I don't want anyone clipping my mirror."
The best part is she tries a "Gotcha" with them when she said "You assumed that I was operating my vehicle." But earlier when the cop asked if anyone else was with her she said no.......soooo if you didn't operate your vehicle, who did? A ghost? A kidnapper?
Funny thing is, the whole thing about calling a lawyer to make cops leave you alone is for interrogations only, not for traffic stops. When it comes to traffic stops lawyers will only help with what comes from if after the fact.
Fun fact: Cops only have to read your miranda rights when you're in custody AND being questioned. Anything she says can still be used against her, just not what she's questioned about. The questions at the beginning are still fair gane because she wasn't in custody at the time. Anything she says after asking for an attorney can also still be used as long as the cops don't question her. If she's a lawyer, she's clearly not a criminal one.
Ohh, I was wondering why the cops stopped asking questions after awhile. I have no doubt she was lying about being a lawyer, or maybe she had just started studying for it or something. No way she wouldn’t be aware of this, even while being drunk
Correct. I used to regularly not read Miranda rights until we got to processing because they'll just blab all sorts of stuff during the car ride un-prompted that can be used against them.
Weird. Same fact as yesterday….and day before that…and… *edit* Lmao at all the “bUt LoOk aT hIs cOmMeNT hIStoRY iDiOt HuRr dUrR”. It’s the same comment that has been posted a million times, I didn’t say it was the exact same person posting it every time. Go look at basically any previous video and you’ll find this same exact comment verbatim. (That means word for word, for all you supergeniuses that know about the comment history function)
I like how at some point her lawyer brain kicks in to tell her to stop talking to the cops, but then her drunk brain overpowers it and just keeps talking anyway.
Usually, I don't like having these clips explained by someone, but between "cattywampus," "lost in Narnia," and many other amusing remarks, I laughed a lot listening to you.
Massive massive massive props to the officer questioning her throughout, she had such a golden ticket with how chill and kind he was during the whole thing, his patience is absolutely astounding especially with her unhinged and condescending arrogance
I’ve never seen pretty white girl privilege go this hard! I’ve only interacted with the police when I was getting a wellness check, and when I was the victim of a crime. Have they ever been this kind to me? Nope.
@@jdeanwalsh Yeah, if she was any good at her being a lawyer, she would've exercised her right to remain silent, requested an attorney, and played it to the hilt. Probably would've ended with a court order to get her bac via blood test, at which point her only out would've been to try to find grounds to have it thrown out.
My brother was a funny and highly entertaining drunk. That is until he'd slide behind the wheel of a vehicle. The old saying, God looks out for fools and drunks, really seemed to apply to him. As he'd usually would get busted within minutes of driving off. When he didn't manage to make it home without getting busted or hitting anything. It was always a single vehicle collision. Trees, signs, curbs, guard rails and poles were always his victims. Somehow he never took out a parked vehicle either(to the best of my knowledge).
@@Jaseadavis2255She hit a parked car. Low speed rollovers occur most often in heavy traffic. All it takes is your vehicle tire to catch the side of another vehicle and it literally will ride up the side until it flips.
I wouldn’t doubt she’s a lawyer, I worked as a paralegal for a few years and was shocked at the stupidity I seen in what I always thought was more prestigious career.
I've got a friend who was supposedly a lawyer. Guy is in the 37% tax bracket. Makes plenty of money. He's just not very smart. Has several "red flags" as far as understanding of money and basic socio economics. Doesn't really understand taxes, can't cook, and oftentimes would just show a general lack of common sense. I wouldn't really trust him to defend me. And he's horribly colored my perception of lawyers and paralegals.
@@blackjackjester And Teachers, you should see how drunk and loud the teachers get at the bar Friday after school is over. And they all drunk drive themselves home.
@gaminacthemaniac6444 yes! And their therapist has a therapist too! Eventually it's like a snake eating its own tail. In fact it's reported 95% of people in therapy are therapist's!
Fun fact it also absolutely does. Anything you say to a cop can be used against you no matter when you say it or under what circumstances. Even if they tell you it can’t it can and will.
Thank you for Clowning on Drunk Drivers like this, Lost my cousin and his son back in '21 to a drunk driver goin over 100 in a residential. Instantly ruptured a hole in our families lives, Everything just feels different since, and i don't think ill ever recover.
I'm sure you've heard 100 times over that it gets easier or gets better as time goes on. But the pain of loosing someone like that never really goes away I'm sorry that this happened to you. I know its horrible now but you Will heal I may not know you but I truly believe that stay strong and give love❤
That is sad, very sad indeed, but id recommend stop thinking like a victim "oh god oh why ill never recover omg ill be miserable all my life" There are things way worse than dealing with a family member's death, you NEED tools to deal with sad/difficult things, losing a cousin and his son is... well, it is sad but not any way near other stuff that can/has happened to other people. Get help.
I'm sorry man Just know Jesus loves you. He wants to help you heal. He wants to comfort you. He will fulfill you more than anything in this world, I speak from experience (from when i did Romans 10:9-13), he loves you and wants to be in a meaningful (not romantic) relationship with you. :) “that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” Romans 10:9-13 KJV “and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.” Mark 1:15 KJV If you want proof that Jesus and the Bible are true look a documentary called “Ron Wyatt discoveries 2022” on UA-cam and a UA-cam channel called Expedition Bible. They both examine archeological sites and discoveries that prove the Bible, and even reference secular sources. (Just don’t convert to 7th day Adventism after watching the documentary) And lastly if you don’t know the gospel and want to be saved search up “abc’s of Salvation Teenmissions” on Google and it should be the first or second result. When you click on it read the whole thing, and do what it says and have faith in Jesus while you are doing it, do not doubt, and if it is hard for you to do what it says, ask Jesus to help you, have faith that he will, and *he will.* God Bless, and I pray things get better.
@@dr_cachetes6822...Honest questions for a moment here. A fair amount of questions, admittedly. You've touched on something of a complex but important psychology topic. I understand longer comments can be undesirable to read for some. But, since many other people in life have had to read *far* more text than this for various reasons, it shouldn't be an issue, right? Do you believe that because some people's pains are worse than that of others, that the experiences of those with less suffering are less real, sympathetic, or deserving of validation? If so, would you agree to all of your own pains in life being devalued in this fashion as well? Since it's true that there's *always* someone out there who has it worse, this would imply that any suffering of your own would also be less valuable, under this logic. If you lose an arm, someone out there has lost both. If you lose loved ones, which you place as less damaging on a general scale despite it having led people to end their lives throughout history, someone out there has lost *all* their loved ones, *and* their arms. That's not even exaggeration. To be consistent with these values, you'd have to accept that if you ever desired comfort or validation for things that go wrong in your life, the response towards your own suffering should also essentially be "this is sad, but not in any way near other stuff that can/has happened to other people." If you *don't* believe that, then are you aware the way you've phrased your comment implies that you do? Because the wording borders on outright mockery, and if you don't intend that, then it may be prudent to clarify. To have tools for dealing with sad things throughout life is beneficial, I agree. But it may be helpful to know that the way you have framed this information has a high probability of coming off as pretentious, tactless, and ill informed to most people. Ill informed because you do not actually know how close he was with those family members. You do not know the grand majority of the event's details, only that loved ones have died. Yet, you use hyperbolic quotation to reframe his sentiment as juvenile and weak willed in nature. You also, intentionally or unintentionally, do phrase your message in a way that implies his pain has less value. Simply due to not being the worst possible thing for a human to experience. Why? If the intent truly is to just give helpful advice, what necessity is there for phrasing things like this? In any case, are you aware that just because someone has suffered more in life, it does not mean that those with less suffering are any less alive and capable of experience? That their pain does not simply cease to exist simply because others have it worse? That the mental damage they acquire from a traum@tic event is no less real and potentially life altering? That humans can have extremely different responses to the same stimuli, and that what may traumatize one person may be something easily controlled by another? That the inverse can be true for those same people as well? I have seen a veteran of the 'n a m war(odd abbreviation because I am unsure if You+ube will nuke the comment over these topics, they've done it before, I may make similar shortenings later as necessary) comfort his loved ones over their loss of a pet. When he himself had been in life or death situations where he had to see friends die in front of him. Do you believe that veteran is wrong or unnecessarily sympathetic to feel for them, despite having suffered much worse in his own life? Or is it that the ones who lost their pet are under some sort of designated "time limit" to how long they're allowed to feel sad about the loss? Do you feel that if they are experiencing sorrow for "too" long according to someone else, they should feel weak or unfit for life's hardships due to that ongoing pain? If not, then again your phrasing implies you hold a belief that their sorrow should be limited in scope somehow, by some nebulous metric. Are you aware that telling people their pains are inconsequential compared to others' has caused people to seek out suffering, develop strong self hatred, and in the worst cases beat themselves physically or take their own lives? Not even that rare. They can feel such guilt and shame for feeling as hurt as they do, because they are reminded that others have it worse. People have so often been irreparably mentally damaged by things that other folks could get through without such issues, because humans can have a staggeringly diverse range of reactions to things in life. Yet the mental debilitation that some accrue can be enough to ruin their own bodies, despite their best attempts to fight the damage. Their minds may be unable to cope with it's own reactions to stimuli, despite being something manageable by others. I do not attest to have gone through the worst things conceivable in life, not by far. That said, some personal anecdote. Over the course of the past several years I've been in an emotionally @busive relationship, lost my best and only IRL friend who I'd known for 17+ years, lost my ability to travel easily due to developing health issues(I generally only go out for food and hospital visits), lost my ability to eat most foods, have had several operations, and developed daily chronic pain that requires a very carefully managed diet and several different medications just for controlling it. Of course, there are people who have it far, **far** worse than me, and I am aware of this. There are also people that have it better. So when I see an overall healthy person with intact friendships and a properly working body lamenting over the fact that they went through a breakup, am I wrong to feel bad for them? Does my suffering give me the "right" to take their words and twist them into some oversimplified caricature of a teenager's woes? Are we not both allowed to lament over shared pain together? Find solidarity in the suffering, even potentially use it to heal? Why should I deny them this because I've had it worse? Why do that when there's an opportunity to assist them via similar advice *without* just adding to their sense of self loathing? Because that's what this sort of devaluation will do to many people. It can often simply empower their depression, and actually serve to elongate the recovery time. There are folks I respect, who have themselves had lives much worse than my own. Yet. They didn't devalue my pains when we spoke. They understood, gave me perspectives of their own. Gave me empathy. Motivation. Had they instead told me I just needed to figure out how to deal with it, and to get over anything because others somewhere always had it worse? Then they would have simply been doing the same thing those people and circumstances that did this damage to me had done. The same thing my abusive ex did. Had the more helpful folks shared this "It's not that bad, get over it" sort of philosophy instead of helping me though compassion, I would likely not be here. At best I would certainly not be fit to write, or even really use You+ube. To even care enough about life to do so. Not for lack of trying, mind you. But because my mind and body just couldn't keep up any more. Not with that immature approach to life. ...If you want a (sorta lol)-TL;DR, then perhaps the most direct way to highlight the issue here is this. I have seen a Father tell his children multiple times that they should not cry as often as they do, should not be as afraid of him as they were. Crying for some reason he couldn't understand. Because as he told them more than once: He *"did not be@t you physically, like other dads would."* -His- dad used to punish him via whips from sticks ripped off a tree. He and other kids had it way worse, so "stop being so oversensitive." Honorable mention also goes to "You want to whine and cry? I'll *give* you a reason to cry, if you're going to act like that." Because his understanding and concern for their emotional state was so detached that he literally could not understand that they were genuinely sad. As if he thought, since his issues were worse during his own youth it meant that they were simply "overreacting". That their sadness wasn't really legitimate. These same children later grew into young adults that developed various debilitations through the course of their lives, and so much due to the nature of this "merciful" parenting. Their physical states were one thing, their mental states another. To highlight just 2, one ran away to live on the street because she literally *preferred soup kitchens in winter* over her former and even spacious home. Another was essentially institutonaIized for 2+ years, due to *multiple* $ui-side attempts over the course of her teens. *All* of them got diagnosed clinical depression. But hey. They were never be@t3n like other kids, and others had it way worse, right? Maybe simply telling them they need to get over the sadness because "life is tough and you need to deal with it" would help. Maybe simply telling them their pain was inconsequential and to just cope without explaining *how* or showing them empathy would be enough to just produce good results, healthy lives and a happy family. Yet I know it didn't. Not the first time, and not the hundredth. That family has long since been heavily damaged. Each kid knew that wherever they ended up, they preferred it where their parents weren't. And for some reason, those that got to move out started doing *better* with their lives in many ways. The same is true for so many families, so many people. So I suppose the bottom line is: Does your philosophy happen to be one that agrees with that of the Father's? If not, then I suggest you rephrase that comment. Because as it reads currently, it's ability to actually assist the person you aimed it towards is heavily limited. It's too familiar, and not in a good way.
She 100% has gotten out of many of these situations before by her entitled tone and actions during this interaction, this wasn't drunk talk, this was "I'm better than you, so be gone" talk.
She "obviously" way used to getting her way or acting like a child when she doesn't. I don't know what's more annoying in life, people like her, or the people who always give in to and enable, people like her.
The most concerning part about this was that the intoxicated woman had a child seat in the back of her car. I don’t want to imagine what could have happened if a kid was in there.
my neighbor's husband left her for a younger woman after cheating on hid wife for a year, ruining a 20 year marriage. My neighbor in turn decided to drive drunk a couple of weeks later, totaling her SUV and obliterating our neighborhood entrance. Thank god her kids are all grown bc she is just like this lawyer...@@saltyzu8412
@@saltyzu8412 Not sure, I feel like a bitch like this would take absolutely zero shit from her kids an be a pretty demonic mother that would ruin their self-esteem.
Well and even without the kid being in the car (thankfully), that kid was SOMEWHERE and mom didn’t come home like planned. Not to mention there’s clearly no way this was a “oh I never drink like this” situation
Obviously it’s just the obvious non-plussed and unimpressive vehicular dismount here. Sooo not anything to see here and obviously nothing going on. Not sure Obviously why everyone is making such a big deal out of this, obciously she didn’t hit anyone else’s car or damage to anyone else’s property.
This still doesn't top the one where a drunk 24 year old woman was speeding, gets stopped, flees twice, then has a mental breakdown trying to get her dad to bail her out because he "owns the island" only for her dad to come out to the scene to give her the cold shoulder and tell her she's going to jail.
For anyone who doesn't get this: her saying "nope" was answering another question. If you needed this explained, then you're probably as high as I was 😂
I also love tat when she was asked how much alcohol would she say is in the "Beer Cocktail" she almost said "4% Octane" like she's grading fucking gasoline efficiency.
She'd have to be drunk to grade something as "4% octane", I don't even know if they sell that anywhere in the world. That's like a fucking megascam, you'd need to refill your tank every five minutes.
Lawyer here - the Miranda Warning aka Miranda Rights only attaches when two elements are met: 1. the defendant is in custody, and 2. the defendant is being interrogated. Custody and interrogation also have their own definitions with elements that need to be met, such as not being free to leave (indicates custody). Even if an officer fails to properly Mirandize a suspect, if the suspect makes "spontaneous statements against interest" those statements can be used. It only matter for when police are actively questioning you and/or coercing you to talk. There are more details of course but this is basically the gist of it. I work in criminal defense, so these are elements that I almost always look for. Attorneys in other specialties are not savants; you eventually forget extraneous details if you're not specializing in that area of law. I would be curious as to what she specializes in, if she even is a lawyer at all. Let's hope it's not criminal defense.
Ik, people don't realize what can come back to bite them, you gotta tell em ONLY what happened, don't be snarky or a smartass, just answer the questions carefully and stay quiet
I watched the full video on the other channel and the only terms she mentioned that "felt" like lawyer jargon were assumption vs assurance. Though as a non-lawyer there may be something I missed.
May 2 marks the day I quit drinking 7 years ago in 2017. I occasionally find videos like this to remind myself how destructive my former life was and reason to stay alcohol free. Hopefully this young woman learns from this humiliating experience and gets sober herself.
as someone that works in insurance, the answer i get to "what happened?" is far too often "i don't know" and the follow up question of "were you driving the vehicle" and the response "yes" kills me every time
I KNOW THIS GIRL!!! I met her some time in the last year at a pizza place in eau claire wisconsin. I was out back having a cigarette and she was came up and started talking to me being all entitled and telling me about how she "helps people get their lives turned around" but never really could describe what she did. She then lectured me about everything she perceived me to be doing wrong in my life, me a 27 year old man, i think i know myself pretty well and don't need this stranger lecturing me. Anyways, she is a friend of a friend and anytime i've seen rachel she's been HAMMERED. I mean, i know we're in wisconsin and all, but she has always been like 8 shots deep minimum anytime I've run into her.
She reminded me of my step Mum, she hated me for no reason I was just not HER kid, luckily I was 18 when I went to visit my dad finally for the first time ever, I could not manage that hurtful woman if I was a young child.
@@mrsoul680 Police absolutely don’t have to read Miranda rights to you if they arrest you. The only time it’s mandatory is when you’re about to be interrogated. Cops don’t have to tell you what you’re arrested for and they don’t have to read Miranda rights to you until you’re being interrogated.
6:50 sounds like the exact moment the officer decided "yeup, Rachel is going to jail tonight". Just the slight release of the handcuffs, actually kills me
As a Criminal Justice major who’s about to apply to law school, anybody who takes a beginner criminal justice course knows that Miranda is only required when you’re being interrogated any time after arrest.
It’s amazing how much she’s convinced herself that she’s got this in the bag. Definitely only had one 4% beer cocktail. She can’t honestly believe that she doesn’t sound drunk.
Because she does got this in the bag, I guarantee this is the last you'll hear of it, shes got pretty woman privilage, slap on the wrist and sent off, Wisconsin loves their drunks.
You'll never see more misplaced self-confidence than in a drunk person who thinks they can act sober. Everything around you seems slowed-down so it feels like you can just take it easy and charm your way out of things, what you don't realise is that you are the slow one, the world around you is still going at its normal pace. Hope she gets more than a slap on the wrist, imagine if she'd crashed into a car with less aware drivers behind the wheel or worse an unassuming pedestrian.
she went from “i obviously was driving my vehicle” to “you assumed i was operating my vehicle, correct?” lmaoo lawyer mode kicked in and came with a case of amnesia
Your last sentence made my evening, thank you
Yeah only a dumbass admits to it.
It's all apart of her plans. She invoked her 5th amendment right and immediately continues to talk, she's trying to assert dominance over the police officer lol.
both you and the guy reacting are dumb. she was saying "you assumed i was operating my vehicle under alcohol", but since she's drunk, she forgot to add the alcohol part after saying it once... she is not trying to say that she wasn't driving.
it really amazes me that she admitted to driving. They wouldn't have been able to convict her without her admission.
I love how the woman just sees the police officer and immediately crosses her arms and stands next to him looking at the car like. "No clue. A mystery wrapped in a enigma. It may never be figured out"
Even the riddler and batman couldn’t figure this out
"Don't worry officer, we'll catch those hooligans!". 👮🙅
a mystery wrapped in a mystery... ur not smart
*In hotdog suit*
We're all trying to figure out who did this!
"Maybe, if I act like the officer, he'll think I'm another cop who just happened to come along and find the scene.... yes, this is a perfect plan! Rachel, you've done it again!"
- Rachel's internal monologue
She's her own attorney, so whenever she says "you'll talk to my attorney", she OBVIOUSLY means that she'll keep talking
*Obviously!*
Haha!
🤣
I bet the officer became depressed after that realisation.
🤣😂😆🤣😂😂🤣👍🏼
She’s like Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, when she says anything about them talking to an attorney she mentally changes into her attorney.
9:05 “As a cocktail I’m sorry.” You see, obviously she wasn’t the driver, she was the drink, so obviously it’s not her fault… obviously.
I missed this I am crying laughing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
WEEEEEEEEEEEENN
dear god… that means the driver is still out there…
Her standing next to her flipped car on a quiet road, explaining "I only had one cocktail", that's like something you'd see in a sitcom.
It'd be worse to lie to a police officer about it though. Her best bet was to try to make a case that it was under the legal limit.
@@HoushalterI mean it’s pretty obvious she’s lying but police and the courts are not allowed to assume such
I saw this on Law and Crime Network's channel the other day, and I thought she was attractive until the officer said that her breath reeked. Bad hygiene is an instant turn-off. I've had to call girls out on it before, didn't matter to me if the first date was ruined. Her car was full of clutter, so she's definitely a messy person.
*standing next to a flipped car*
"I only had one cocktail"
*sitcom laugh*
Your comment doesn't make sense and it isn't needed if you judges
strong “i will not rest until i find out who shit my pants” energy from this lady
I love wizards with guns, great reference
IS THAT A FUCKING WWG REFERENCE
Reminds me of a story of one of my friends growing up. When he was a little kid he took his caca balls and stuck them in the VCR. when his mom asked who did it, he told her Chester did it. Chester was the family dog.
tf is wizards with guns? i thought this was a travis pastrana reference
@@gkrees9509 look em up, they're hilarious
As a bouncer, I love when very clearly drunk people try to sound not drunk af when they’re talking to you because you know they truly believe they’re acting completely normal
As an imaginary person I love it when real people try to talk to me.
@@symbolsarenotreality4595 I like your name. there’s this theory by a Physicist named Bachelard who said symbols and poetry are deeply connected to memory. Would you consider memory to be reality / real? I see memories and symbols like a shadow or reflection of reality, but honestly idk if shadows and reflections are *real* either
This is true lol I love it they really try to be so proper and everything
People who pretend they aren’t drunk are missing the entire point cause they look like they’re trying to act sober by acting “not drunk”
@@obrey__wtf just happened
3:13 "It's Rachel right" "yes Rachel, it's nice...yeah". I love how she OBVIOUSLY started saying "it's nice to meet you" lmao
boo
She may be a lawyer, but I have a feeling she never passes a bar.
Underrated comment
clever
nice
Hehehe
Bars
The fact that she actually tells a law enforcement officer "It's okay, we all learn." Unbelievable arrogance.
That's a little device we like to call "foreshadowing" later down the line we're going to explore "plot twist" when one of them does in fact learn.
Classic sovcit move: "I'm going to EDUCATE you about the law, officer."
While shes an idiot and deserves everything thats coming…. Alot of “law enforcement” do not understand the law and you see it in the news every day. Its both sad
True dat
LOL
I love how she was just so calm about it in the beginning: "Oh hi hello there" as if her car is not literally SIDEWAYS.
I’m 100% better than Charles 💀🤣
@rrr11779 You have 1 sub 🤡
@@SussyGabrielOFFICIAL bot spotted
@@p-__ lmao finally someone who makes fun of bots
hi hello there
Man being a cop with people like this just seems so exhausting.
I know it makes me think dealing with these kinds of people makes cops the jaded against all people. When i watch this stuff i feel bad for the cops which is super rare.😲
Wait till you see them go up against some acorns
I was expecting her to say “obviously “ when cop asked her if she had been drinking!
Obviously
You would think as a lawyer, she would have known better than to incriminate herself repeatedly
being honest with good cops like these 2 goes a long wayyyy
She could just be lying about being a lawyer
She was wasted... Clearly
@@Anonymous-ld7jeobviously 😂
@@qqu1nten This is one of those situations where it's better if it doesn't go a long way. It's not like getting caught in a speed trap going 12 km/h over the limit. Not that it really matters for Rachel lol.
She's either pretending to be a lawyer or she's so drunk that she believes she's already in court and not in a cop car. A lawyer wouldn't talk to the cops, let alone start pleading her case right there, handcuffed, in the back of a cop car.
At first I thought she was buying time to try and get the alcohol level a little lower for the blood test
@@ChaoticMoronshe would have to be a lot more sober to even have a slight sprinkle of this idea
@@hyde3155 🤷♂️ but it was only one beer-cocktail haha
I don’t think Rachel has passed any bar, exam or otherwise.
she probably in law school that her parents put her in
If she *is* a lawyer, she's doing a damn good job of making sure no one who sees this shit will ever hire her to defend them.
Let's hope that she's one of the other types of lawyers... actually let's hope she gets some involuntary time off; the rest of us would!
@@Stephanie-we5epHere’s your Most Delusional Comment award. 🏆
sounds like she's been listening to "Chille DeCastro" alil too much..
(Chille's STILL currently in 3rd place, for The Grifties Award btw 🏆)
.. what a "Law Scholar"..
She's as much of a lawyer as a child playing one, but she definitely is a liar. Maybe she got those two words mixed up.
i get what you’re saying, but her defense in the car, while actively being shitfaced, is a pretty good argument. as bad as it may sound from our POV, she was actually building reasonable doubt, even while being shitface.
“I am not the drunk you’re looking for” the ole drunk Jedi mind trick. She’s high on her gaslight fumes…
It worked for me once. I said I'm not drunk, I'm on a lot of drugs. The cops were confused and left
You can tell Rachel has gotten away with a lot in her life and nobody has ever checked her before 😂
She’s gonna get a rude awakening 😅
@@klataface Not likely, the bias in the "justice" system is outrageous. A woman or minority can literally commit murder right now and be released with no bail.
you said check her like shes gonna get her card pulled in the hood😆
i blame her, her parents and the people around her.
Guarantee she accuses all of her exes of being "narcissists" and "insecure"
Having your story covered by Charlie is the worst possible social death
Not if hes laughin at it, but in this case absolutely 😂 I thought same thing
This space probably seems bigger than it is when you are consuming it. Most of us have pretty focused interests that led us here, a few million people spread across the planet seeing you fuck up sounds bad. But I’d bet few face many social consequences from this lens.
@sealboy1211 ummmm, no dude. Charlie is PLENTY to rocket her off into a social crash and burn. 80% of those who know her are aware of her mistake by now- and as much as 50% will see his commentary specifically.
She was viral before, him covering means she's entered the viral history books. It's like pouring concrete on it for posterity for sure. His impact goes WELL beyond the mere number of subscribers.
@@Drakholm it’s easy to feel a space this large is “that” big. The mind can’t really visualize such numbers. You can’t really tell if a giant crowd you are in the middle of is 1000 people or ten thousand people. It’s pretty much the same in these mental spaces we congregate in. If you could somehow poll all the random ppl you pass in a day as to their knowledge of this channel, you may be surprised(perhaps it would be me, I’m not stamping my feet that you are wrong)that not many know Charlie not know of this video and that this persons life, is already as messed up by it as it will likely be. That a penguin fan would see this AND have even a small ability to punish her directly in the form of lost opportunity etc etc is extremely small.
I mean to say sure it is enshrined for us, but none of this ready mix is gonna touch her feet, our perch is not so high, she might not even see us over here.
@sealboy1211 And I'm saying 2% of the people she knows could know about his channel and the trickle down effect could amount to 30% in under a week. Of course he's a hegemon in but a "small" niche/cloistered fan base. But even if his subscriber base was 2 million it would have a sizable impact. 14 million crosses several thresholds that make it exponential. But again, she was already viral before Charlie decided to reply. But look at his recent commentary on that Rubi Rose nonsense. Without his video I don't think anyone would ever know her shit was a ploy. But the internet 100% does now. And they don't have to watch his videos directly for that to be the case.
I love how she says ''you assume I was the one operating my vehicle, correct?'' as if she wasn't literally the only one around her car the entire time
I mean the assumption is based on her direct statement that she did operate the vehicle and was alone. So, she is kinda right.
@@crankfastle8138 I assume you mean the "lawyer" was kinda right, which I disagree, I cant remember now but charlie did say she admitted to being the one driving before getting in the police's car
@@crankfastle8138 isn't that a stupid question to ask when she literally stated she was the one driving the car, it's her car and nobody's in her car beside her?
jugding by what she looks like here, i would die to see how the trial went out
district attourney: _presses the button to start playing the video_
also district attourney: the people rests its case
@@imnotrobot4394 no stupid questions, just stupid answers. Like her stupid answrrs to the first officers questions.
All she had to do was say, “I’m very confused and disoriented. I think I’m injured. Can you call an ambulance?” That would have ended all questions right there and given her time to prep a story (as well as sober up at the hospital).
U must be a criminal 😂
An attorney!
Wow that's exactly what I'll do if anything ever happens like this to me!
Smart
I thought i was the only one like guurl u coulda saved urself from this 😂😂 just act concussed, she'd gotten away with it too
The line "It's a bitch when you arrest a lawyer" actually caused me physical pain from the overwhelming amount of cringe, she really thought she was megaminding the cop.
Well, she's a lawyer, and she's a bitch, so she was really just stating facts. (Obviously)
I rarely groan out loud at a video but fuck that got me
well OBVIOUSLY she was
@@tanyavasina2028😂😂😂😂
CORRECT
The female officer saying hi and her just going, "Ummm nope." made me laugh so hard. That officer looked at this officer like, "Wow." lol
You’re lucky you arent a cop
@@justsomeasianguy220huh?
You're sucky you aren't a poc
@@justsomeasianguy220
@justsomeasianguy220 I'm curious too wtf are you talking about?
@@justsomeasianguy220 but what if they are a cop
“Do you always ask redundant questions?” She’s got a LOT of nerve
“On,y when talking to drunks”. Obviously
obviously
Dont you know white women are allowed to be disrespectful to cops
Obviously! 😂
“Do you always say obviously?” - me if I was the cop
It's a pre-existing condition that every single drunk/high driver ever is utterly incapable taking accountability for anything, even when they're sober; it's just the kind of people they are.
This was obviously insane on her part, but I was in shock when she said "it's a b*tch when you arrest a lawyer" because in her head canon she genuinely believes she's owning these cops at every turn. This is possibly the worst drunk driver Charlie has ever talked about.
“obviously” haha
Besides that one lady who had driven over a bunch of people while driving drunk, resulting in deaths, and then laughing about it when being interviewed.
Obviously
@@THErealMarMar. who was this...?
Maybe not "worst", but certainly "most insufferable".
"There was no car on the side of the road" Into the Officer quickly flashing the light on it was so perfect that no TV show could match it's situational humor
She is obviously a victim of the most elaborate hit and run. Someone crashed into her, parked that car on the street to frame her, then ran away... obviously
fr all it needs is a sitcom laugh track
@@samueldubik4418u gotta be joking
I love when they say “I’m not speaking anymore” and they can’t stop themselves from talking.
Alcohol makes assholes bigger assholes
“I’m not speaking anymore……I just think it’s funny that…”
Coke
6:50 love this part where she starts a sentence but never finishes it
The audacity of drunk drivers never stops surprising me like how tf are you gonna do something like that and be mad when you get in trouble 💀
Yes
Because ... they're, you know ... drunk
@iCortex1 why do we even allow alcohol to be legal at this point, its one of the most harmful things one can consume
@@zugdigitalx prepubescent take
@@eshryo alcoholic take
Love how she was communicating so calm like her car wasn't rotated 90 degrees on its side
should I Drop out of school to BECOME the greatest artist ever❓🙏🤞
@@GeeManFig yes
Its just a car
gaslight gatekeep girlboss
@@GeeManFig only the first half of that is within your capabilities, I am going to assume.
"Rachel your going to jail"
"REALLY??"
"Obviously..."
Like, yeah.
😂😂
you’re*
BUDDY
The most unintentional hilarious thing in this video is at 12:00. When she says, “You assumed I was operating my vehicle” You hear LOUD CRICKETS!🤣🤣
She's trying to get them to say it so she can later use it in court. Some of that lawyer brain is trying to swim it's way to the top, but that beer-cocktail is just straight drowning it!😂😂😂
Man I was waiting for the police officer to mock her voice and say "Wellll obviouslyyyyy... You're drunk"
I don't think he could manage that level of vocal fry. Yahh...
You can tell she’s never been held accountable for anything in her life. Have fun reliving this night for ever, unbelievable.
Reeks of pretty privilege finally getting checked.
she won’t remember it😂 only through video
@@208shooteryes, that’s the “forever” part.
Dude, she totally got away with it. She didn't learn shit. A bunch of incel Charlie fans laughing at her doesn't even exist in her universe.
Obviously, she hasn’t
The start of it is already pure comedy gold. "Looks like you crashed your car, huh?" "No," she says, as she crawls out of the sunroof, "I didn't". That's the whole goddamn story right there. That's a masterclass in writing.
"I parked it, sir. This is not a very wide road, you see, and I don't want anyone clipping my mirror."
"That's how I always park, show me where it's written that I can't park like this."
"What do you think they put this convenient roof exit on the car for, tell me that!"
Seems like a perfectly reasonable place to park...
“It looks like you might’ve crashed ur car huh?” 😭
Obviously.
As it's on it's fucking side lol
The best part is she tries a "Gotcha" with them when she said "You assumed that I was operating my vehicle." But earlier when the cop asked if anyone else was with her she said no.......soooo if you didn't operate your vehicle, who did? A ghost? A kidnapper?
I bet it was AI!
Jesus took the wheel from her
Well, I do remember there was a crash with Tesla, driven by AI
Obviously
I feel like the "Obviously, I was driving" bit would be more helpful here
Officer: "Have you had any alcohol?"
Rachel: "Ugh.. Obviously."
Do you always ask redundant questions, like…obviously
Like the jokes they obviously write themselves. 😅😂.
I like the part where he says "It's Rachel right?" and she says "yeah it's Rachel, nice-" because she realizes she's introducing herself again lol.
Yeah that was so funny hahah
Also loving the "I'm not going to answer any more questions" "you're not going to answer any more questions?" "Right, I'm not"
"yeah it's Rachel, it's nice... yeah. I was just driving down the road"
Her affectation almost makes my head explode. Literally and obviously.
It's so wild that a person can act so entitled when they know their life is over.
should I Drop out of school to BECOME the greatest artist ever❓🙏🤞
@@GeeManFig you aint doin shit
A dui charge wont ruin your life, it will make it more difficult though
Nah, she'll lawyer up, maybe get her license suspended for 6 months.
It's wild that DWI is a crime at all.
As she started to sober up you can tell she realizes she's in deep shit and tries to lawyer out of it
Fr
Funny thing is, the whole thing about calling a lawyer to make cops leave you alone is for interrogations only, not for traffic stops. When it comes to traffic stops lawyers will only help with what comes from if after the fact.
"Have you had anything to drink tonight?"
"Well, obviously..."
9:30 missed opportunity to call it a „You‘re Loko“
He won't sleep knowing this
Fun fact: Cops only have to read your miranda rights when you're in custody AND being questioned. Anything she says can still be used against her, just not what she's questioned about. The questions at the beginning are still fair gane because she wasn't in custody at the time. Anything she says after asking for an attorney can also still be used as long as the cops don't question her.
If she's a lawyer, she's clearly not a criminal one.
Ohh, I was wondering why the cops stopped asking questions after awhile. I have no doubt she was lying about being a lawyer, or maybe she had just started studying for it or something. No way she wouldn’t be aware of this, even while being drunk
Well, she is literally a criminal lawyer
@@Pownypower(literally)
Correct. I used to regularly not read Miranda rights until we got to processing because they'll just blab all sorts of stuff during the car ride un-prompted that can be used against them.
@@Pownypowerwell OBVIOUSLY
Today's Fact: In 2021, a team of scientists created a 'living concrete' material, made with bacteria that can grow and heal cracks on their own.
I’m 100% better than Charles 💀🤣
Damn you beat me too it you got the first comment
Weird. Same fact as yesterday….and day before that…and…
*edit*
Lmao at all the “bUt LoOk aT hIs cOmMeNT hIStoRY iDiOt HuRr dUrR”.
It’s the same comment that has been posted a million times, I didn’t say it was the exact same person posting it every time. Go look at basically any previous video and you’ll find this same exact comment verbatim. (That means word for word, for all you supergeniuses that know about the comment history function)
thank you for the daily facts, facterinocommenterino
It's been literal seconds and this guy is here already. I don't know who or what you are but I do not like you
I like how at some point her lawyer brain kicks in to tell her to stop talking to the cops, but then her drunk brain overpowers it and just keeps talking anyway.
Obviously, I can fix her /s
Blackout=Thinking brain(off). Lizard brain(ON).
Usually, I don't like having these clips explained by someone, but between "cattywampus," "lost in Narnia," and many other amusing remarks, I laughed a lot listening to you.
Massive massive massive props to the officer questioning her throughout, she had such a golden ticket with how chill and kind he was during the whole thing, his patience is absolutely astounding especially with her unhinged and condescending arrogance
I think he was trying to get her to talk as much as possible before asking if she’d been drinking. He’s collected evidence.
I’ve never seen pretty white girl privilege go this hard! I’ve only interacted with the police when I was getting a wellness check, and when I was the victim of a crime. Have they ever been this kind to me? Nope.
do not talk to cops.. ESPECIALLY not cops that are "kind" to you. have yall never heard of good cop bad cop before? lol
@@jdeanwalsh Yeah, if she was any good at her being a lawyer, she would've exercised her right to remain silent, requested an attorney, and played it to the hilt. Probably would've ended with a court order to get her bac via blood test, at which point her only out would've been to try to find grounds to have it thrown out.
@@pattomwau I'm obviously no lawyer like Rachel, but I thought they can't use anything she says in court before having her Miranda rights being read?
"What's going on, how'd this happen?"
"I... don't know"
Horrible but goddamn drunk people are so funny sometimes
I really do wonder how she did that tho
My brother was a funny and highly entertaining drunk. That is until he'd slide behind the wheel of a vehicle. The old saying, God looks out for fools and drunks, really seemed to apply to him. As he'd usually would get busted within minutes of driving off. When he didn't manage to make it home without getting busted or hitting anything. It was always a single vehicle collision. Trees, signs, curbs, guard rails and poles were always his victims. Somehow he never took out a parked vehicle either(to the best of my knowledge).
@@Jaseadavis2255She hit a parked car.
Low speed rollovers occur most often in heavy traffic. All it takes is your vehicle tire to catch the side of another vehicle and it literally will ride up the side until it flips.
@@lennychorn147They used to pin a badge on you when you crawled out of the wreckage. 1970s.
The only thing that was absolutely OBVIOUS was how drunk this girl was
The entire time it gives the energy of
"Hey honey٫ wheres your brother?"
"What brother?"
I wouldn’t doubt she’s a lawyer, I worked as a paralegal for a few years and was shocked at the stupidity I seen in what I always thought was more prestigious career.
I've got a friend who was supposedly a lawyer. Guy is in the 37% tax bracket. Makes plenty of money. He's just not very smart. Has several "red flags" as far as understanding of money and basic socio economics. Doesn't really understand taxes, can't cook, and oftentimes would just show a general lack of common sense. I wouldn't really trust him to defend me. And he's horribly colored my perception of lawyers and paralegals.
Sadly, this frequently applies to doctors as well.
@@blackjackjesteryeah my family Doctor definitely didn't get any As in school. 😆
The real fact its people overestimate other people for havin a degree
@@blackjackjester And Teachers, you should see how drunk and loud the teachers get at the bar Friday after school is over. And they all drunk drive themselves home.
This woman needs a therapist.
And her therapist is going to need a therapist.
Fun fact: all therapists have therapists! She's sorted
@dazcaz8205 Do the therapist that have a therapist also have a therapist?
@@gaminacthemaniac6444They're the same therapist so there're no "also" about it.
And a few beer cocktails.
@gaminacthemaniac6444 yes! And their therapist has a therapist too! Eventually it's like a snake eating its own tail. In fact it's reported 95% of people in therapy are therapist's!
Atleast she will save money on a lawyer
I’m 100% better than Charles 💀🤣
Idk she might try to charge herself
Wonder if she'll go to court sloshed
To be clear, even a lawyer would never represent themself in court
It wasn’t the lawyer fault it was the parked car that was in the way
the part where she said "I was just driving my vehicle down the road" wouldve been perfect timing for the officer to say "obviously"
I'm not a lawyer, but considering her name is Rachel she has no Miranda rights. At most she has Rachel rights.
Looks like she mostly has Rachel Wrongs
Ha cha cha!
Sadly I have a sister named Rachel, and yet I agree
Obviously
@@wyattjohnson5181 This was hilarious dude
Fun tip:
If a cop blatantly says, “It’s not going to incriminate you further,” then that’s a for sure sign that they know SOMETHING.
Fun fact it also absolutely does. Anything you say to a cop can be used against you no matter when you say it or under what circumstances. Even if they tell you it can’t it can and will.
Thank you for Clowning on Drunk Drivers like this, Lost my cousin and his son back in '21 to a drunk driver goin over 100 in a residential. Instantly ruptured a hole in our families lives, Everything just feels different since, and i don't think ill ever recover.
I'm sure you've heard 100 times over that it gets easier or gets better as time goes on.
But the pain of loosing someone like that never really goes away I'm sorry that this happened to you. I know its horrible now but you Will heal
I may not know you but I truly believe that stay strong and give love❤
God that's awful. What a senseless tragedy.
That is sad, very sad indeed, but id recommend stop thinking like a victim "oh god oh why ill never recover omg ill be miserable all my life"
There are things way worse than dealing with a family member's death, you NEED tools to deal with sad/difficult things, losing a cousin and his son is... well, it is sad but not any way near other stuff that can/has happened to other people.
Get help.
I'm sorry man
Just know Jesus loves you. He wants to help you heal. He wants to comfort you. He will fulfill you more than anything in this world, I speak from experience (from when i did Romans 10:9-13), he loves you and wants to be in a meaningful (not romantic) relationship with you. :)
“that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.”
Romans 10:9-13 KJV
“and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.”
Mark 1:15 KJV
If you want proof that Jesus and the Bible are true look a documentary called “Ron Wyatt discoveries 2022” on UA-cam and a UA-cam channel called Expedition Bible. They both examine archeological sites and discoveries that prove the Bible, and even reference secular sources. (Just don’t convert to 7th day Adventism after watching the documentary) And lastly if you don’t know the gospel and want to be saved search up “abc’s of Salvation Teenmissions” on Google and it should be the first or second result. When you click on it read the whole thing, and do what it says and have faith in Jesus while you are doing it, do not doubt, and if it is hard for you to do what it says, ask Jesus to help you, have faith that he will, and *he will.*
God Bless, and I pray things get better.
@@dr_cachetes6822...Honest questions for a moment here. A fair amount of questions, admittedly. You've touched on something of a complex but important psychology topic. I understand longer comments can be undesirable to read for some. But, since many other people in life have had to read *far* more text than this for various reasons, it shouldn't be an issue, right?
Do you believe that because some people's pains are worse than that of others, that the experiences of those with less suffering are less real, sympathetic, or deserving of validation?
If so, would you agree to all of your own pains in life being devalued in this fashion as well? Since it's true that there's *always* someone out there who has it worse, this would imply that any suffering of your own would also be less valuable, under this logic. If you lose an arm, someone out there has lost both. If you lose loved ones, which you place as less damaging on a general scale despite it having led people to end their lives throughout history, someone out there has lost *all* their loved ones, *and* their arms. That's not even exaggeration. To be consistent with these values, you'd have to accept that if you ever desired comfort or validation for things that go wrong in your life, the response towards your own suffering should also essentially be "this is sad, but not in any way near other stuff that can/has happened to other people."
If you *don't* believe that, then are you aware the way you've phrased your comment implies that you do? Because the wording borders on outright mockery, and if you don't intend that, then it may be prudent to clarify. To have tools for dealing with sad things throughout life is beneficial, I agree. But it may be helpful to know that the way you have framed this information has a high probability of coming off as pretentious, tactless, and ill informed to most people. Ill informed because you do not actually know how close he was with those family members. You do not know the grand majority of the event's details, only that loved ones have died. Yet, you use hyperbolic quotation to reframe his sentiment as juvenile and weak willed in nature. You also, intentionally or unintentionally, do phrase your message in a way that implies his pain has less value. Simply due to not being the worst possible thing for a human to experience. Why? If the intent truly is to just give helpful advice, what necessity is there for phrasing things like this?
In any case, are you aware that just because someone has suffered more in life, it does not mean that those with less suffering are any less alive and capable of experience? That their pain does not simply cease to exist simply because others have it worse? That the mental damage they acquire from a traum@tic event is no less real and potentially life altering? That humans can have extremely different responses to the same stimuli, and that what may traumatize one person may be something easily controlled by another? That the inverse can be true for those same people as well?
I have seen a veteran of the 'n a m war(odd abbreviation because I am unsure if You+ube will nuke the comment over these topics, they've done it before, I may make similar shortenings later as necessary) comfort his loved ones over their loss of a pet. When he himself had been in life or death situations where he had to see friends die in front of him. Do you believe that veteran is wrong or unnecessarily sympathetic to feel for them, despite having suffered much worse in his own life? Or is it that the ones who lost their pet are under some sort of designated "time limit" to how long they're allowed to feel sad about the loss? Do you feel that if they are experiencing sorrow for "too" long according to someone else, they should feel weak or unfit for life's hardships due to that ongoing pain? If not, then again your phrasing implies you hold a belief that their sorrow should be limited in scope somehow, by some nebulous metric.
Are you aware that telling people their pains are inconsequential compared to others' has caused people to seek out suffering, develop strong self hatred, and in the worst cases beat themselves physically or take their own lives? Not even that rare. They can feel such guilt and shame for feeling as hurt as they do, because they are reminded that others have it worse. People have so often been irreparably mentally damaged by things that other folks could get through without such issues, because humans can have a staggeringly diverse range of reactions to things in life. Yet the mental debilitation that some accrue can be enough to ruin their own bodies, despite their best attempts to fight the damage. Their minds may be unable to cope with it's own reactions to stimuli, despite being something manageable by others.
I do not attest to have gone through the worst things conceivable in life, not by far. That said, some personal anecdote. Over the course of the past several years I've been in an emotionally @busive relationship, lost my best and only IRL friend who I'd known for 17+ years, lost my ability to travel easily due to developing health issues(I generally only go out for food and hospital visits), lost my ability to eat most foods, have had several operations, and developed daily chronic pain that requires a very carefully managed diet and several different medications just for controlling it. Of course, there are people who have it far, **far** worse than me, and I am aware of this. There are also people that have it better.
So when I see an overall healthy person with intact friendships and a properly working body lamenting over the fact that they went through a breakup, am I wrong to feel bad for them? Does my suffering give me the "right" to take their words and twist them into some oversimplified caricature of a teenager's woes? Are we not both allowed to lament over shared pain together? Find solidarity in the suffering, even potentially use it to heal? Why should I deny them this because I've had it worse? Why do that when there's an opportunity to assist them via similar advice *without* just adding to their sense of self loathing? Because that's what this sort of devaluation will do to many people. It can often simply empower their depression, and actually serve to elongate the recovery time.
There are folks I respect, who have themselves had lives much worse than my own. Yet. They didn't devalue my pains when we spoke. They understood, gave me perspectives of their own. Gave me empathy. Motivation. Had they instead told me I just needed to figure out how to deal with it, and to get over anything because others somewhere always had it worse? Then they would have simply been doing the same thing those people and circumstances that did this damage to me had done. The same thing my abusive ex did. Had the more helpful folks shared this "It's not that bad, get over it" sort of philosophy instead of helping me though compassion, I would likely not be here. At best I would certainly not be fit to write, or even really use You+ube. To even care enough about life to do so. Not for lack of trying, mind you. But because my mind and body just couldn't keep up any more. Not with that immature approach to life.
...If you want a (sorta lol)-TL;DR, then perhaps the most direct way to highlight the issue here is this. I have seen a Father tell his children multiple times that they should not cry as often as they do, should not be as afraid of him as they were. Crying for some reason he couldn't understand. Because as he told them more than once:
He *"did not be@t you physically, like other dads would."* -His- dad used to punish him via whips from sticks ripped off a tree. He and other kids had it way worse, so "stop being so oversensitive." Honorable mention also goes to "You want to whine and cry? I'll *give* you a reason to cry, if you're going to act like that." Because his understanding and concern for their emotional state was so detached that he literally could not understand that they were genuinely sad. As if he thought, since his issues were worse during his own youth it meant that they were simply "overreacting". That their sadness wasn't really legitimate.
These same children later grew into young adults that developed various debilitations through the course of their lives, and so much due to the nature of this "merciful" parenting. Their physical states were one thing, their mental states another. To highlight just 2, one ran away to live on the street because she literally *preferred soup kitchens in winter* over her former and even spacious home. Another was essentially institutonaIized for 2+ years, due to *multiple* $ui-side attempts over the course of her teens. *All* of them got diagnosed clinical depression.
But hey. They were never be@t3n like other kids, and others had it way worse, right? Maybe simply telling them they need to get over the sadness because "life is tough and you need to deal with it" would help. Maybe simply telling them their pain was inconsequential and to just cope without explaining *how* or showing them empathy would be enough to just produce good results, healthy lives and a happy family.
Yet I know it didn't. Not the first time, and not the hundredth. That family has long since been heavily damaged. Each kid knew that wherever they ended up, they preferred it where their parents weren't. And for some reason, those that got to move out started doing *better* with their lives in many ways. The same is true for so many families, so many people.
So I suppose the bottom line is: Does your philosophy happen to be one that agrees with that of the Father's? If not, then I suggest you rephrase that comment. Because as it reads currently, it's ability to actually assist the person you aimed it towards is heavily limited. It's too familiar, and not in a good way.
"You didn't tell me what I am under arrest for"
Well, OBVIOUSLY... You were drinking and driving. OBVIOUSLY.
She 100% has gotten out of many of these situations before by her entitled tone and actions during this interaction, this wasn't drunk talk, this was "I'm better than you, so be gone" talk.
Real big "do you know who my dad is???" energy
Be gone thot! Be gone!
She "obviously" way used to getting her way or acting like a child when she doesn't. I don't know what's more annoying in life, people like her, or the people who always give in to and enable, people like her.
Thats just how lawyers think of people
Ya obviously she’s like yaaaa.
I love how she was just casually digging through the sunroof as the officer approached.
She's trying to find the "revert" button so she can get going again
😆
She's a self made gal, making job opportunities for herself.
you've heard of judge jury, and executioner, now get ready for: criminal, lawyer and defendant
@@tiagobelo4965 Coming soon TO AMC!
Ob
@@tiagobelo4965viously
😂
2:20 okay. so like. that was personal.
The most concerning part about this was that the intoxicated woman had a child seat in the back of her car. I don’t want to imagine what could have happened if a kid was in there.
She is most likely raising a child…. That’s horrifying. Imagine, more of her being replicated and taught how to act in the world.
my neighbor's husband left her for a younger woman after cheating on hid wife for a year, ruining a 20 year marriage. My neighbor in turn decided to drive drunk a couple of weeks later, totaling her SUV and obliterating our neighborhood entrance. Thank god her kids are all grown bc she is just like this lawyer...@@saltyzu8412
@@saltyzu8412 Not sure, I feel like a bitch like this would take absolutely zero shit from her kids an be a pretty demonic mother that would ruin their self-esteem.
Well and even without the kid being in the car (thankfully), that kid was SOMEWHERE and mom didn’t come home like planned. Not to mention there’s clearly no way this was a “oh I never drink like this” situation
tony soprano:
"The worst part is I'm not intoxicated" while sounding like she can't keep her eyes open, she's so close to passing out. 😂
Obviously it’s just the obvious non-plussed and unimpressive vehicular dismount here. Sooo not anything to see here and obviously nothing going on. Not sure Obviously why everyone is making such a big deal out of this, obciously she didn’t hit anyone else’s car or damage to anyone else’s property.
Maybe she received a head injury…shortly after birth
The hand movement was a somatic component for an enchantment spell she failed to cast because because of intoxication.
Being shitfaced aside, I think you need decent charisma to be a sorcerer.
12:21 dude!! This bit of talkative my by you here had me laughing SO HARD!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂
I love how the officer treats her like the little baby she is, handling the situation so comedically well.
This still doesn't top the one where a drunk 24 year old woman was speeding, gets stopped, flees twice, then has a mental breakdown trying to get her dad to bail her out because he "owns the island" only for her dad to come out to the scene to give her the cold shoulder and tell her she's going to jail.
Any way i can read or see this history?
@@arono2341 Bro, google exists, he told you more then enough. Use your brain.
@@callmetravesty8762 bro am i supposed to copy and paste the whole storie on Google? I was just asking for a name or something btw i wasnt asking u
@@arono2341 I typed "dad owns this island arrest" into UA-cam and found it straight away.
You're just lazy/thick
@@arono2341search "body cam dad owns island" and you will find the video
Y'know Charlie, I reckon she did pass the bar, and went straight to her local off-license instead
Underrated comment
She was coming back from the bar lmao
Obviously
@@skellybones1428you're a clown 😂
She's never passed the bar, she always stops for a round!
That car that mysteriously appeared parked on the side of the road saved someone’s life that night
9:38
“I won’t answer anymore of your questions.”
“You’re not gonna answer any more of my questions?”
“Nope.”
😂😂😂
I enjoyed that thoroughly
For anyone who doesn't get this: her saying "nope" was answering another question. If you needed this explained, then you're probably as high as I was 😂
@@colt4505 "for those at home who might be wondering 🤓☝️🤓☝️"
Good timing, I read this right as it happened in the video.
I also love tat when she was asked how much alcohol would she say is in the "Beer Cocktail" she almost said "4% Octane" like she's grading fucking gasoline efficiency.
Beer Oct….
I took that as her mispronouncing alcohol because she’s drunk.
@@brodymccarty9709 Perhaps, but I like my interpretation better.
It definitely sounded like she was about to say octane 🤣 because she's drunk
She'd have to be drunk to grade something as "4% octane", I don't even know if they sell that anywhere in the world. That's like a fucking megascam, you'd need to refill your tank every five minutes.
Lawyer here - the Miranda Warning aka Miranda Rights only attaches when two elements are met: 1. the defendant is in custody, and 2. the defendant is being interrogated. Custody and interrogation also have their own definitions with elements that need to be met, such as not being free to leave (indicates custody). Even if an officer fails to properly Mirandize a suspect, if the suspect makes "spontaneous statements against interest" those statements can be used. It only matter for when police are actively questioning you and/or coercing you to talk. There are more details of course but this is basically the gist of it.
I work in criminal defense, so these are elements that I almost always look for. Attorneys in other specialties are not savants; you eventually forget extraneous details if you're not specializing in that area of law. I would be curious as to what she specializes in, if she even is a lawyer at all. Let's hope it's not criminal defense.
Ik, people don't realize what can come back to bite them, you gotta tell em ONLY what happened, don't be snarky or a smartass, just answer the questions carefully and stay quiet
As a transactional attorney she sounds like a transactional attorney.
Not a lawyer here... and I was giggling at her. She just kept indicating she is aware of her rights and voiding them
@@bcc5701 To be fair, y'all have it rough as well. It doesn't excuse her abhorrent behavior, but it does add some context as to her state of mind lol.
I watched the full video on the other channel and the only terms she mentioned that "felt" like lawyer jargon were assumption vs assurance. Though as a non-lawyer there may be something I missed.
Nice jedi mind trick: "There was no car there....I did nothing wrong.....I can move along....move along"
She 100% manipulates people in her life, you can feel how she’s so used her mega mind tactics working 😂
tbh her fried out manner of speech is perfect to make it hard to tell if she’s drunk or sober. Classic lawyer move.
She's a female man. What do you expect? They have literally evolved to have this with out even trying. It's coded in.
May 2 marks the day I quit drinking 7 years ago in 2017. I occasionally find videos like this to remind myself how destructive my former life was and reason to stay alcohol free. Hopefully this young woman learns from this humiliating experience and gets sober herself.
7 years amazing! wish you the best
@@randomperson2680 Much appreciated friend, God bless!
Keep striving brother 🤙🏻 this random stranger's proud of you
Very good! That’s impressive!
Good for you!
Her: "I won't answer anymore of your questions."
Him: "You won't answer anymore of my questions?"
Her: *answers the question*
I love this.
"so were you driving this way?"
"yeah obviously thats the way the vehicles facing" 🔥
If someone can act this poorly when caught committing a horrible crime, imagine how bad they are in general day to day life.
Somehow her saying “it was only 4% alcohol” and then the cop’s bodycam subsequently panning to the flipped car is hilarious.
as someone that works in insurance, the answer i get to "what happened?" is far too often "i don't know" and the follow up question of "were you driving the vehicle" and the response "yes" kills me every time
I thought she was going to cry and throw a fit when they arrested her but honestly this is more embarrassing
Obviously
Inigo Montoya: “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”
ooohhhh.... one of my all time fav movies. a classic. you have great taste
OBVIOSLY
Inconceivable !
F in chat for princess bride enjoyers
Goated
I KNOW THIS GIRL!!! I met her some time in the last year at a pizza place in eau claire wisconsin. I was out back having a cigarette and she was came up and started talking to me being all entitled and telling me about how she "helps people get their lives turned around" but never really could describe what she did. She then lectured me about everything she perceived me to be doing wrong in my life, me a 27 year old man, i think i know myself pretty well and don't need this stranger lecturing me. Anyways, she is a friend of a friend and anytime i've seen rachel she's been HAMMERED. I mean, i know we're in wisconsin and all, but she has always been like 8 shots deep minimum anytime I've run into her.
😂😂😂😂
An alcoholic who pretends to help people getting their lives together... believable.
Is it alcohol or some other substance?! Or both?
Lmao
what a kind and goodhearted person, such a same shes down on her luck...
if a person says obviously 3 times in 2 sentences when you're asking them obvious questions, this is definitely a red flag
She wasnt drunk, she just flipped it over with her hercules level strength so she could fix her tire
Obviously
She definitely gives me step mom that you *don't* visit during the holidays vibes
Or not visit at all unless forced by your mother to visit your father vibes
Obviously.
Something’s wrong with my brain bro every time I read stepmom
She reminded me of my step Mum, she hated me for no reason I was just not HER kid, luckily I was 18 when I went to visit my dad finally for the first time ever, I could not manage that hurtful woman if I was a young child.
Funny how after all of that, she still acts like it was a minor accident
should I Drop out of school to BECOME the greatest artist ever❓🙏🤞
meanwhile her car is flipped over sideways
@@ninjafrog6966honestly I’m surprised the neighbors didn’t hear the crash
She didn't do it. She's stunning and brave. Leave her alone.
@@bobjoe5937 no boomer 🤡
cops only read miranda when they want to question you
You’re 100% correct about the Miranda rights. The only time they have to read them to you is when you’re under interrogation.
*Miranda
1. Under arrest; and 2. Being interrogated. If either is lacking Miranda not necessary.
@@mrsoul680 Police absolutely don’t have to read Miranda rights to you if they arrest you. The only time it’s mandatory is when you’re about to be interrogated. Cops don’t have to tell you what you’re arrested for and they don’t have to read Miranda rights to you until you’re being interrogated.
@@allengainzmma both are necessary, you have to be under arrest at the time and being interrogated for Miranda to apply.
Honestly she’d have a better chance In court if she said “the physics engine broke”
6:50 sounds like the exact moment the officer decided "yeup, Rachel is going to jail tonight". Just the slight release of the handcuffs, actually kills me
4:00 - “Obv…CLEARLY…”
Ahhh you almost said it. 😂
As a Criminal Justice major who’s about to apply to law school, anybody who takes a beginner criminal justice course knows that Miranda is only required when you’re being interrogated any time after arrest.
She's probably a copyright lawyer or something
Rachel really went “That is all. And furthermore,”
"In conclusion, here is the beginning of my next essay"
It’s insane how calm she is. She just rolled her car.
She’s drunk AF
@SoDa-zh9gq she just rolled her car!!
Man I was on a walk. I heard a noise. There’s a car obviously flipped tipped rolled
@Nelumbo_lutea she just rolled her car!! 🤣
@@chadmccoy8032she’s hammered!
AAnd she just rolled her car 😂
5:08 "Rachel" 👁️👅👁️
It’s amazing how much she’s convinced herself that she’s got this in the bag. Definitely only had one 4% beer cocktail. She can’t honestly believe that she doesn’t sound drunk.
Because she does got this in the bag, I guarantee this is the last you'll hear of it, shes got pretty woman privilage, slap on the wrist and sent off, Wisconsin loves their drunks.
Cars just flip bro
but the beer cocktail WAS 4%! ...before they added the absinthe, vodka, tequila, rum, turpentine...
@@neoasura Lol truth. Getting a DUI is a borderline rite of passage in Wisconsin.
"Wiconsin: The Florida of the North"
You'll never see more misplaced self-confidence than in a drunk person who thinks they can act sober. Everything around you seems slowed-down so it feels like you can just take it easy and charm your way out of things, what you don't realise is that you are the slow one, the world around you is still going at its normal pace.
Hope she gets more than a slap on the wrist, imagine if she'd crashed into a car with less aware drivers behind the wheel or worse an unassuming pedestrian.