I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. But someone with their legs together will have poor balance, and someone bent over slightly will be susceptible to being thrown forward.
Can you, please, create new playlists for each belt level of Judo? It would be easier to learn Judo from your UA-cam channel if you create new playlists based on belt colours.
There is no one syllabus, every national governing body in Judo has their own criteria - so there is no way for us to create a playlist in the way you suggest that is relevant for all our audience, amd creating one based on one countries requirement might cause confusion for people.
@@EfficientJudo so, we actually went for it yesterday in training... is a very well rounded variation... i think, that some of us will use kata guruma more in randori...
According to the Kodokan, this technique is considered yoko-sutemi, therefore it cannot be kata-guruma which is te-waza. This technique is considered a variation of UKI-WAZA.
It's Kata-guruma if the head is under the armpit, or without, it would be yoko-otoshi. Just feeling the technique, it's clear with the action of tori that uke is wheeled over the shoulders, it feels very different to an uki-waza.
@@EfficientJudo As I wrote, that's what the Kodokan says, they're the ones who say what is or isn't. So it is not my opinion, nor your opinion nor anyone else's opinion that will define the name of the technique. This is in the book by Toshiro Daigo, 10th dan of the Kodokan. In this video technique there is lateral sacrificial action (yoko-sutemi-waza), therefore, it cannot be kata-guruma which is te-waza. And the uke is not projected laterally (it is not yoko-otoshi). It's uki-waza.
@ricardokerscher if you watch the example of competition Kata-guruma here, you can see many times this version is getting classifed as Kata-guruma and not uki-waza or yoko-otoshi. judo.ijf.org/techniques/Kata-guruma
When I wrote it is not mine, not yours, not anyone else's opinion, that includes the IJF. Who names the nomenclature of techniques and which variation fits into a given technique name is the Kodokan, no one else.@@EfficientJudo
I was just thinking about how this would go down. Very timely.
Thanks for watching!
My son's new favourite technique.
Thanks for watching!
I'll give that a go on Monday 😊
Thanks for watching!
We learn things from you seinse thank you
Thanks for watching!
I like this variation a lot. It feels more like a proper kata guruma due to being able to elevate and push with the sleeve arm
Yeah, it's a good variation for the current rules.
top
Thanks for watching!
Is there any techniques that will work for people with their legs closed and or has their body bent over slightly or more?
I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. But someone with their legs together will have poor balance, and someone bent over slightly will be susceptible to being thrown forward.
Can you, please, create new playlists for each belt level of Judo? It would be easier to learn Judo from your UA-cam channel if you create new playlists based on belt colours.
There is no one syllabus, every national governing body in Judo has their own criteria - so there is no way for us to create a playlist in the way you suggest that is relevant for all our audience, amd creating one based on one countries requirement might cause confusion for people.
will show it today in training, sensei is sick and asked, if someone can do something... hope, that i don't fuck it up... xD
Thanks for watching!
@@EfficientJudo so, we actually went for it yesterday in training... is a very well rounded variation... i think, that some of us will use kata guruma more in randori...
According to the Kodokan, this technique is considered yoko-sutemi, therefore it cannot be kata-guruma which is te-waza.
This technique is considered a variation of UKI-WAZA.
It's Kata-guruma if the head is under the armpit, or without, it would be yoko-otoshi. Just feeling the technique, it's clear with the action of tori that uke is wheeled over the shoulders, it feels very different to an uki-waza.
@@EfficientJudo As I wrote, that's what the Kodokan says, they're the ones who say what is or isn't. So it is not my opinion, nor your opinion nor anyone else's opinion that will define the name of the technique.
This is in the book by Toshiro Daigo, 10th dan of the Kodokan.
In this video technique there is lateral sacrificial action (yoko-sutemi-waza), therefore, it cannot be kata-guruma which is te-waza. And the uke is not projected laterally (it is not yoko-otoshi).
It's uki-waza.
@ricardokerscher if you watch the example of competition Kata-guruma here, you can see many times this version is getting classifed as Kata-guruma and not uki-waza or yoko-otoshi. judo.ijf.org/techniques/Kata-guruma
When I wrote it is not mine, not yours, not anyone else's opinion, that includes the IJF.
Who names the nomenclature of techniques and which variation fits into a given technique name is the Kodokan, no one else.@@EfficientJudo