Interview with Jack Beeston, From The Legal Team Suing Andrew Tate
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 тра 2024
- Help support the lawsuit at: www.crowdjustice.com/case/hol...
Patreon: / runkleofthebailey
Locals: runkleofthebailey.locals.com/
BTC address: bc1qdqzpz6ny6w35qyl2rnasshjm60jvwcjgllwcay
All comments for information only. Do not take anything as legal advice--if you have a legal issue, contact a lawyer directly so that you can received advice tailored to your situation. All views expressed are solely those of the creator.
Thank you, Mr Beeston, for the work you do. As a British lawnerd I hope your endeavours are successful. And thank you, Ian. This was such a wonderful insight into the legal efforts against Tate in the UK.
It makes my skin crawl that there are men like Tate, but the existence of men like Runkle & Beeston helps me deal with it. Thanks, guys.
You must be scared of men
Runkle is the true alpha male
You mean accusations!
I'm consistently impressed by the variety of quality content you post. This is a great interview. Good luck to Mr. Beeston, his firm, and the victims in getting justice.
Great interview Ian, a very interesting insight to the case. As a UK citizen it's great to be able to hear from a British Solicitor involved in it all
Definitely, it's really interesting for me to see some UK law happening here. From a Scottish resident
I appreciate you doing this interview as the only other lawyer on UA-cam who really covers Andrew Tate is Bruce Rivers.
Love Bruce as well!
He's one of my favorites too!
I thought the Adin Ross text leaks were memes, holy shit. I didn't realize that Romania would extradite, but good on them.
They went to Romania cuz the "trafficking" laws were "relaxed" & STILL managed to get arrested?! They must have done some really BAD 💩!!
Thanks we need more sensible, truthful talks about this case. Thank God for men with integrity and sensitivity towards awful abuse of women.
Great interview! I hope “A.Taint” gets his day in court and is finally brought to justice.
I have this feeling that he wasn’t planing to flee Romania but that he was just trying to create urgency for adin to go stream with him because he needs the views/money and adin has a massive following on the alternative channels. Which if that was the case it makes it even funnier.
this was an awesome interview, jack was great! so happy to see more men coming out and speaking about this, as a woman and a survivor it's genuinely terrifying to see so many men and boys supporting and espousing his rhetoric.
Frightening. So glad the victims were brave enough to come forward. Pixie dust to them
So glad not a single one of them hopped onto the bandwagon for their own personal 15 secs of fame... Surely Surely. How do you tell them apart.
Alleged victims?
Important case, thanks for covering this
I'm so glad you interviewed this man...I think this is big news
Making this mans name news is what made him popular. Same with trump. If you don't like it, ignore it unless you are in a personal position to affect change.
Getting a chance to give $$ for the lawsuit is a way to make a change also!
@@nobodynoone2500Conversely, it has to be spoken of to bring it into the open and dealt with. Too many young people are being influenced by their continued diatribe.
Awesome. Ian I always follow Bruce rivers on tater tot issues thanks for bringing this❤
OH WOW! thank you for this runkle i wasn’t expecting content, but i really appreciate this coverage. i feel it’s not talked about enough given his popularity
Thank you so much for your discussion with Mr. Beeston!
Regarding the point made at 31:36: I personally coach and counsel men in finding their own particular type of masculinity, their values and how to approach things like dating, career etc. in an open-minded, flexible and modern way. I dislike Tate and his toxic influence immensly, as do many others working in the same field around me. But we are licensed professionals with a nuanced and inclusive, non-judgmental approach to the world - as such very much less likley to attract the "cultist following" you generate on social media with soundbites that are missleading but aimed at triggering simple basic emotions.
Meaning, the opposition is there, but by it's very nature not as rowdy and loud as the culprit. Same as a competent politican trying to provide complex solutions to complex problems are less likely to get their point across in a five-second TV clip, whereas the populist opposition will just claim some radical "do X" and be heard. A true problem of modern media and attention economy.
Absolutely. The nuanced advice that is more realistic and healthy just doesn’t go viral.
Another scammer 😂😂 you're no better 😂😂😂
@@younggeezer8232 can you explain what exactly is a scam?
Keep doing your best and hopefully the ones you influence will influence others.
@@Elle-elle-ellelooks like troll-bait to me. Ignore the ignoramouses.🥀🌹🌹
Very informative. Thank you Ian
Great interview Ian. Thank you both 🇨🇦
Thanks Runkle! Eff Andrew Tate!
Great interview, Ian!
Replay crew. Thank you to you both for highlighting the fight against this putrescent man.
Thank you for this interview, and for reminding the world of the fact that the stuff Tate is accused of doing is disgusting. The fact that someone with those kind of allegations is a celebrity speaks volumes of how far society has fallen.
There are still people defending Danny Masterson! IK!!
Brilliant interview! Thank you!
thank you so much for this video Ian - it's always nice to have more reasoning behind active legal disputes, no matter the range.
Yay, so much enjoyed this interview.
Thank you ..
In the US, there are jury awards for hundreds of millions of dollars, but damages are usually significantly reduced by the courts by as much as 50-65% if not more.
Great interview Ian!
Need to put Andrew Tate in front of the title. Like Andrew Tate Sued! The add the interview part. This should have way more views.
I’m just here fr the unhinged tater-tots
He's so right, we need more guys willing to speak out and say 'that's not masculinity' Tate's got his little club so twisted around that any argument a woman could make is manipulative 😢
sucks when you have to ask guys to do some mansplaining 😂
Ah they don’t listen to anyone, even other men. They call you a “beta male” and a “simp” for believing women should have human rights 😂
They’re nuts
Get this discussing man!!! I hope justice is served.
Great stream Ian ❤️
Thanks for this interview, and to Jack/team - I'd love to see more press with you guys but obv that might not be your preferred route.
Good afternoon Ian
I'm learning again
Kudos!
Great audio!
There are many positive male role models talking about Tate being wrong
This should be interesting! I'll watch when I can ❤
Interesting change of pace
Hello Runkle
Hello!
Good afternoon Ian!
23:45 I'm so angry at myself for knowing what you're talking about 😂😂😂😂
Rewatch crew
20:40 aprox. I can't fathom why he'd be surprised. Considering the way that same place service handled the rotherham accusations.
How long do they have to be detained before trial or settlement?
Tates are trying to stall the proceedings. They are currentky at preliminary chamber stage arguing that some of the evidence (70,000 pages) should not be admissable.
Andrew is currently facing upto 19 yrars.
❤❤❤❤❤
I just hope that, whatever the result, it is clear cut; that the final verdict isn't reliant on vague proofs, assumptions, or technicalities.
There is so much conflicting information out there right now, and too many emotional reactions, that there cannot be a perception of impropriety, backroom deals, or anything else that could throw shade over the final decisions.
The Romanian human trafficking case has solid evidence. It is hard to debunk bank statements.
Or trying to explain that governments started forging those statements already 8 years ago just in case tha Andrew will become one day famous.
Andrew told in court that some girls were paid 20% or even less ("They worked practically for free.") when 50% had been promised. In the light of precedents, that alone, with bank statements confirming the same, can get him convicted. Criminal Code Art 210 defines 32 variants of human trafficking. Recruitment with deceit is one of them.
(Court of Appeals, file number 37100/3/2022)
Furthermore, on April 21, 2020, Andrew posted a video: "I have 8 girls. This month they produced $511,000. I give them a couple thousands each. Rest is mine."
Not exactly a 50/50 split, is it?
Andrew has declared no legal income. Yet he deposited $10 millions, out of which $5 millions with reference "rev OnlyFans". Hence the second, still ongoing, investigation of money laundry etc.
Andrew is facing upto 19 years for the current charges, and more will likely be added.
It will be interesting to see how many views you get
Hello from Ohio
Beeston is not a serious lawyer-you can tell just by how he stammers and doesnt answer questions clearly and directly. if you want a better idea of the allegations check out the vice doc on the tates. it becomes very obvious then why the prosecution didnt proceed.
12:22- "Do you guys have alot of safety concerns?" Ian asks, as the guy darts ANOTHER ANXIOUS LOOK out the window ( or to his right. I'm assuming he's not spent the whole talk darting anxious loos at a wall), pre-occupied to the point of barely being able to keep verbal momentum through a complete sentence...Gee, idk??? Any safety concerns...😂😂😢😮😂??? Hmmm...
THe friggin TATES. Flew too close to the sun, I guess. Hope you guys had fun while it lasted...
Thanks, Ian...🎉😂❤
Who is Andrew Tate ?
Someone who does the whole Alpha Male stuff. He is currently arrested on sex trafficking charges and being held without bail in Romania.
The conservative side of things like him because he promotes the alpha male/trad wife lifestyle and like anything else that causes cognitive dissonance they believe Tate when he says that he has been unfairly targeted with these charges (which he in a round about way has admitted to all of them at different times)
@@amandamandamandsWeird, I never heard of that guy.
@@RandallJones-vv3vmyou’re lucky.
Darling of the right wing, teaching red pill masculinity to young men. Very famous
@@amandamandamands what cognitive dissonance?
Please read and review Canada bill. Bill C-63... True nightmare level stuff.
What does that have to do with this? And why has it got you so scared?
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062 Canada law life in prison for undefined hate. Would be nice to see Ian talk about it
@@FranklinFleming-lm1yuYes!!! Definitely needs discussing. Very distressing indeed.😊
Ian needs a timer for videos/livestreams:
Time to de-monetization: 14.3 seconds
😂
I hope they get lots of donations to assist in their legal case. The diatribe from these two need stopping in any way possible. I know the U.K. have to wait their turn but everything in Romania seems to be taking such a long time.
Your line of reasoning is a bit scary. The objective of suing him shouldn't be to stop his "diatribe" or shut him up.
@@worsethanjoerogan8061yeah it’s not like they can constantly censor his opinion or keep a gag order against him. The case seems wishy washy
But hey it may work differently across the pond, I’m not knowledgeable in their laws
31:00 - I understand how hard it is to have pro-feminine and pro-LGBTQ voices online. Sadly, this isn't something new nor is it limited to online spaces either. In part of her album "Nothing in My Closet But My Clothes", Suzanne Westenhoefer commented on people who would do nothing but wait for people like Suzanne to go on radio programs to promote their shows to call in and harass them. And these were supposedly "upstanding Christian Folk". Howard Stern would also comment that while the average listener would listen to his show an hour or two, it were haters like this that would spend all day listening to the show to come up with things to complain about.
Not taking sides but they def. seem the perfect antithesis to each other.
I heard this is because he told people he was moving and that person ran their mouth on stream ( Aiden Ross )
This guy has no experience of a courtroom but he's got interesting stories, especially as he relaxes a bit. How does anyone support the Tates? Yuck!
You would not believe how many do.... The whole alpha male stick club does, the matrix-theory-idiots do and I think they attract a number of incels as well. And especially the first group is quite passionate in defending their "TopG".... And they don't get that he just uses them for their money. (like the "academy" that you buy "lessons" from that only takes you to a discord and you pay more to get to a more "selected" discord and all that stuff...)
All those people might not be the majority but it's much more people than one would think, sadly....
Only his fans support him, but he does nonetheless deserve a fair trial and evidence of these accusations be presented.
Doesn't matter, the Barristers do and solicitors instruct - it's how it works in the two legal systems in the UK
He's not a barrister so he won't have court experience..They will get a barrister to fight it in Crown Court ..
I should have realised he is a solicitor! I am British but I watch too much US and Canadian content!
Who is this guy? Why does he have all these followers?
Nebulous matrix of accusations 😅 he's trying to escape that matrix now, huh?
I enjoy the interviews that you do Ian. Always a learning thing.
I am neither pro or anti Tate. In fact I have rarely seen much from him because the stuff I have seen haven't been that thrilling. On the question of his support, could it be like the Amber Heard thing? Where right now it's allegations, and perhaps people are not quick to just believe the accusers.
As a woman, I don't automatically support other women just because they make a claim. As an SA survivor, I understand how hard and frustrating the process can be but I still cannot promote the "believe all women" thing. There are women that are just as vile as men. I just wonder if maybe people are holding their breaths to see what comes out in the court cases?
As for the online hate and the people that go beyond just stating that they side with Side A or Side B and why, there are always extremists. It is not just on the online world. And I really hope that each country has laws that address harassment or threats of any nature. I would just be cautious on deeming it only online though with governments trying to silence many on the internet or create laws that open up doorways to control, and social credits in democracies.
I appreciate the discussion very much as this was a case I did not have a lot of thoughts or insight into. 👍
If your interested in it then there are lots of videos on YT showing Tate admitting to getting women into a relationship with him then putting them in the position that they can’t leave and makes them have sex with men for money. He’s admitted to having a women who ‘runs’ them afterwards.
2% of accusations by women are false. To be fair you should believe 98% of accusations. I’d also recommend not trying to defend abuse and abusers. Don’t let your ideology blind critical thinking
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062I am not defending anyone. If you read what I actually said its that I do not have an interest in this particular guy so I haven't followed him or his cases. Meaning I have 0 information that makes me draw any conclusions about the man himself.
In fact through the interview I learned a little bit, which is what I acknowledged.
Now as for defending anyone, I didn't. I pointed out that women can be just as vile as men with lies. Which creates an atmosphere of hopefully people not jumping to bash a guy before the court case has even happened. Innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the law. And so far no courts have concluded anything from the sounds of it in this interview.
I have never supported abuse, and its not supporting abuse to acknowledge there have been a lot of false accusations that have happened lately. Amber Heard is the most famous case, but there are other men that have been targeted and lost everything BEFORE the courts have concluded their innocence.
So forgive me if I am not quick to condemn people or cancel them based on the word of people without the actual proof or court cases concluding. You know court, where they have facts, not feelings..
98%@@HellRaisingAngel
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062You can repeat that as much as you want but it still will not make me jump to cancelling someone without real evidence presented. If that is a culture you want to partake in, that's on you. I refuse to because that 2% does a lot of damage that cannot be ignored.
He needs to stop saying um 😢 i couldn't take it
And looking out the window, or at least off camera...and seeming to lose his train of thought. He seemed sweet but it was a slough!! Ugh!
It's an interesting case. I don't care for the Tates. If they are innocent leave them alone. If they are guilty go forward. Very simple
Cancel culture...at it's finest.
$$$$$$$he pays$$$them
It gets harder to believe when the same allegations are made against everyone. What did Andrew Cuomo do again?
Jack Beeson - what's with the passive aggressiveness. If something happened you are clear to talk about it. As a human right. Don't fear questions where you are free to answer
He doesn't sound too confident.
@9:57 you heard through the rapevine? Wtf?🤔
He said "grapevine"
This interviewee provided very little information, and mixed ideological concerns with legal accusations. He's exactly the reason why a lot of people are suspicious about the accusations.
You’re punch drunk eh?
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062I see that too and I may be tired but I'm not punch drunk!!
Lawyer speaking so slow...it's insane how they just muble things acting like they dont know the details when he clearly knows ....make me sick
If the Tates are innocent then the whole subject is meaningless.
Well he admitted on video he was a human trafficker, hooked up with 16 year olds, and stole money from his “employees”. His only defense is “I was lying”. Don’t know how that’s gonna hold up.
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062 It doesn't matter what he said. People often use irony. The only thing that matters is evidence.
@@KevinSolwayAndrew's own comments are used as proof of intent.
The hard evidence in the human trafficking case is the bank statements.
Looks like typical "Metoo" case. I lost any confidence in British Judicial System that prosecutes people for speech or Facebook posts. When is the trial, Ian?
Or the guy imprisoned for 2 years for 'hate' stickering.
Andrew Tate has criminal charges… but ok.
Possibly in the next 8 - 10 years, when Andrew will be extradited back to the UK.
@@PetriTemiseva It’s been going on since 2015. That is one of a “fair speedy trial”.
@@sircorn4248 How do you know? This is a new investigation conducted by Bedfordshire police.
The attorney, Matthew Jury, presenting the 4 alleged victims of the previous case says that there is no connection between these two cases.
They are most likely innocent and it's bitter women. Won't be surprised if so.
Oh so you’re a misogynist cool
🚩
@@bradenculver7457no it's reality.
@@bradenculver7457you don't think women lie? So you are a simp? You believe everything women tell you? 😂😂
@@younggeezer8232 please point to where I suggested women can’t lie
Edit: his comment was deleted, he called me a simp who believes women can’t lie after I called him a misogynist. So yea, we’re dealing with a very good individual here.
Hello from British Columbia Canada 🇨🇦