When Experts should Shut Up.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 кві 2024
- JOIN THE PHYSIONIC INSIDERS [PREMIUM CONTENT]
Join the Physionic Insiders [Standard Tier]: bit.ly/PhysionicInsiders2
Join the Physionic Insiders [Pro Tier]: bit.ly/PhysionicInsidersPro
Standard Tier: Access to the Premium Video Library, Full Study Analyses (+ Summaries), Insider Podcast, , Research Reviews, and More
Pro Tier: All benefits of the Standard Tier + Live Sessions with Me, Consulting Lite, and More
HEALTH AUTONOMY [COURSE]
Learn to Analyze & Apply Studies for Yourself: bit.ly/healthautonomy
JOIN THE COMMUNITY
Join my Community [It’s Free!]: bit.ly/PhysionicCommunity2
EMAIL LIST
One Weekly Email of Value: bit.ly/2AXIzK6
HIRE ME FOR CONSULTING:
Consulting: bit.ly/3dmUl2H
DONATIONS FOR A SCIENCE BASED CAUSE
Patreon: bit.ly/PhysionicPatreon
OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA
Instagram: bit.ly/2OBFe7i
Created with Biorender
CoffeeZilla Video: • are podcasts making us...
*******CRITIQUES, RULES, AND NOTES*******
Be aware of the following rules before posting comments:
- Please do not post summaries of the video in the comments - it damages retention on the video and UA-cam is less likely to promote it (these videos cost me a lot of money to produce).
Critiques of my work are welcome! Please be aware of the following notes & rules before submitting critique:
Be mindful that this content is not all encompassing on the subject at hand and is self-limited for brevity to reach a wider audience. Also, be aware that I receive hundreds of UA-cam comments per day, so the only way your critique can be considered is if you follow the steps outlined below. Finally, UA-cam auto-deletes links, so I do not see most comments with links attached.
RULES:
If your comment is rude, you will be banned.
If your comment is not about the studies/topics at hand (i.e. extending to other outcomes not discussed) or offers critique with no scientific basis, it is unlikely to receive a response.
If you can follow these rules, I will try to address your critique and if there is merit, I will add an AMENDMENT to the content in question and pin it so everyone can see it (thank you!).
Please use the following link to submit your critique: bit.ly/PhysionicCritique
Disclaimer: None of the information provided by this brand is a replacement for your physician's advice. This brand is information for the sake of knowledge and the options of choice it provides, not in any way a personalized prescription. Please consult your physician before making any health related changes.
#coffeezilla #voidzilla #health
A few people are under the impression I'm saying non-experts aren't allowed to have opinions - that is not the point. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but the way the opinion is framed is critical, especially when data/evidence is not forthcoming.
Much needed area of discussion. I have a PhD in cancer bio and I distinctly remember when my mentor advised me to say “I don’t know.” Or just give disclaimers when making educated guesses with references. This skill is absent on social media. Or media influencers use data incorrectly.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is like the poster boy for this
Aren't you an expert on nutrition and not science communication? Why are you addressing this topic as if you are an expert? :>
But I always get my Health Advice from Entertainers and Politicians. They're Experts on Everything.
The word "expert" has no meaning anymore. I should know, I am an expert.
Jordan Peterson talking about nutrition is sad.
This is why I don’t listen to podcasts. Endless jabber, few facts.
Andrew Huberman comes to mind.
You don't have to have a degree in something to know about it.
I spent a great deal of my adult life as a person that was in a position that would be designated as an "expert" in a scientific discipline in a legal setting. There was a process for doing so. One thing I rapidly learned was that the idea of "expertise" was largely bullshit. To me, especially in science, an "expert" is someone that has an acute understanding of and appreciation for the limits of their (and others) knowledge. Its why I roll my eyes and instantly shut off anyone relying on their authority as an "expert" in anything, its just a sign of arrogance.
Unless you’ve been off planet last few years, experts even (especially?) in their field have shown to be less than optimally reliable.
Great discussion.
this is why most people blindly believe the "experts": they think they also have to be an expert to disagree with an expert on a given topic or subject.
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on."
I love this idea of the self correcting podcast!
0:52
There’s also a (admittedly less important) subcategory of expert that I come across. The expert who has not kept up with his field for various reasons but still presumes to be an expert. I’ve seen this most often with retired scientists and doctors but also with people who have changed careers. They sometimes (often?) express “expert” opinion that is no longer valid.
One things that I find EXTREMELY frustrating is that many UA-cam that I might find interesting don't give their credentials in the About section. If one wishes to speak with authority on a subject, then one should give the potential audience the credentials that gives them that authority. For instance, people that rely on their title of "Dr.", but turn out to be chiropractors, burying that info in some off platform website. My personal preference is to not listen to chiropractors on any subject. ,
Community notes on X is a good example of dealing with this issue.