He is just lying when he says kidnspping has to remove the person and rake them somewhere... He smirks precisely because he knows hes just making it up to counter what he knows is the consequence is. Its pure game playing lies.
Kidnapping and unlawful imprisonment share similarities but have distinct differences in terms of legal definitions and elements. Here's how they differ: Abduction vs. Detention: Kidnapping involves the act of abducting or taking a person against their will, often with an intention to move them to another location. Unlawful imprisonment, on the other hand, refers to the act of unlawfully detaining or confining a person against their will, without necessarily involving movement or relocation. Intent and Purpose: Kidnapping typically involves a specific intent or purpose, such as ransom, coercion, or committing another crime. Unlawful imprisonment, however, may not have a specific intent beyond unlawfully confining the person against their will. Consent: In kidnapping cases, the person being taken away has not given their consent to be moved or detained. In unlawful imprisonment, the individual is also held against their will, but the element of consent is generally absent. Duration and Scope: Kidnapping often implies a longer period of unlawful confinement, involving a significant distance or removal from the person's usual environment. Unlawful imprisonment can involve shorter durations or confinement within a specific location, such as a room or building. False imprisonment is similar to unlawful imprisonment, but it typically involves a shorter duration and a lesser degree of confinement. It refers to the intentional, unlawful restraint or detention of a person's freedom of movement within a limited space. False imprisonment may occur when a person is physically blocked from leaving an area, forcibly confined within a room or vehicle, or otherwise restrained against their will.
It wouldn't be kidnapping, BUT, it would be false imprisonment, and that's also a serious crime. But yes, actually, for it to be kidnapping, you have to take the person somewhere, even if it's not far.
@@bubblegumgun3292 I think even a few feet would count, honestly. I don't know though, but I know the person has to be taken and moved somewhere else by force for it to be kidnapping. I don't know how it works if you convince someone to come with you willingly, under false pretenses, then trap them in that place - I'm not sure if that's false imprisonment, kidnapping, or both. It's kind of weird, honestly. But, I get what Andrew was getting at, I think he's going off of what most people would think of kidnapping to be - but legal definitions are always a little bit different than colloquial use of terms.
I hate to say it but i agree with wick. It is true. Most people dont think that far in to it and actually believe that they are peacefully protesting. To be fair though andrew arguing that he can prove what people think is unwinnable
May I remind the soyboy that all protestors are aware of the danger that can befall them because there are less protests in North Korea and Moscow than in New York. Why ? Well we can safely assume they are aware what happens if they do.
He is just lying when he says kidnspping has to remove the person and rake them somewhere...
He smirks precisely because he knows hes just making it up to counter what he knows is the consequence is.
Its pure game playing lies.
It's "false imprisonment" if you detain someone against their will without changing the person's location and without the authority to do so.
My God, the soyjack is unbearable
They are getting paid to do all that shit, is a business and is called political terrorism.
He sounds like he takes bubble baths 🌈
It’s called False Imprisonment!!!
Some protests result in boycotting, which I don’t think is violence.
Peaceful and non-violent are not seperate.
🔥🔥🔥
This guy doesn't understand the origins of the word kidnapped. Where do you find these people? Somebody help me!
Kidnapping and unlawful imprisonment share similarities but have distinct differences in terms of legal definitions and elements. Here's how they differ:
Abduction vs. Detention: Kidnapping involves the act of abducting or taking a person against their will, often with an intention to move them to another location. Unlawful imprisonment, on the other hand, refers to the act of unlawfully detaining or confining a person against their will, without necessarily involving movement or relocation.
Intent and Purpose: Kidnapping typically involves a specific intent or purpose, such as ransom, coercion, or committing another crime. Unlawful imprisonment, however, may not have a specific intent beyond unlawfully confining the person against their will.
Consent: In kidnapping cases, the person being taken away has not given their consent to be moved or detained. In unlawful imprisonment, the individual is also held against their will, but the element of consent is generally absent.
Duration and Scope: Kidnapping often implies a longer period of unlawful confinement, involving a significant distance or removal from the person's usual environment. Unlawful imprisonment can involve shorter durations or confinement within a specific location, such as a room or building.
False imprisonment is similar to unlawful imprisonment, but it typically involves a shorter duration and a lesser degree of confinement. It refers to the intentional, unlawful restraint or detention of a person's freedom of movement within a limited space. False imprisonment may occur when a person is physically blocked from leaving an area, forcibly confined within a room or vehicle, or otherwise restrained against their will.
Kidnapped or false imprisonment. ( in your own home )
His hamster is running so fast.. but it look so fat that it's like standing still. Run big rat
Bless you Drew
The moment I seen the three teeth he has in his mouth I knew the debate was going to be frustrating
It wouldn't be kidnapping, BUT, it would be false imprisonment, and that's also a serious crime.
But yes, actually, for it to be kidnapping, you have to take the person somewhere, even if it's not far.
yeah i was trying to figure out what the word was. this is not kidnapping lmfao but yeah "false imprisonment" is the right word
Correct there needs to be abduction even if just down the street
@@bubblegumgun3292 I think even a few feet would count, honestly. I don't know though, but I know the person has to be taken and moved somewhere else by force for it to be kidnapping. I don't know how it works if you convince someone to come with you willingly, under false pretenses, then trap them in that place - I'm not sure if that's false imprisonment, kidnapping, or both. It's kind of weird, honestly.
But, I get what Andrew was getting at, I think he's going off of what most people would think of kidnapping to be - but legal definitions are always a little bit different than colloquial use of terms.
Anybody who's actually checked knows Andrew is right about it being definitionally kidnapping.
I hate to say it but i agree with wick. It is true. Most people dont think that far in to it and actually believe that they are peacefully protesting. To be fair though andrew arguing that he can prove what people think is unwinnable
May I remind the soyboy that all protestors are aware of the danger that can befall them because there are less protests in North Korea and Moscow than in New York.
Why ? Well we can safely assume they are aware what happens if they do.
You are Soyjacking all over the screen….