Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
History of American Political Parties (Part 1)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лис 2016
- Wew lad the political discourse in this country. Riots, salt, people thinking the world is going to end. This is really just one chapter in a long line of American politics. So sit back and enjoy the multi part series on the American parties.
Music by No Sustain: • Everything's Not Fine ...
Twitter: / althistoryhub
The second channel from AlternateHistoryHub. Since I can't talk about everything on that channel, I decided to have a channel where I can? Geography, history, economics? I can talk about anything, as long as it's knowledge!
You thought you could escape
KnowledgeHub Yup.
KnowledgeHub I thought bit I can't
KnowledgeHub TitanFall 2
KnowledgeHub
Jimmy: come on Cody talk about our latest election
Wasn't Lincoln the first Republican elected to the office of presidency?
But i wanted to talk about the election
Jimmy bad jimmy
Jimmy Hillary lost trump won freedom has spoken
Jimmy I've got a hit on you
tim van rijn Freedom did not speak. The electoral college spoke. Only 60,000,000 voted for him. Only 1/5 of the nation voted for him.
Lol
*1812*
Federalists: We love the Brits
Brits: *Murder federalists*
Must... resist... contemporary politics... jokes...
must resist urge to make Britain better. than America comment, oh wait shit
Bizarre Bits not quite, The brits went around federalist areas in 1812
Just like modern day democrats with Islamic terrorist
***** He said it, not me!
I swear, every time I hear 1:00 I hear "he used _terrorists_ to pay off that debt"
James A Clouder What is it meant to be?
Io I think it's supped to be "used tariffs to pay off the debt"
Tariff's, adding taxes to foreign product's.
Me too, I didn't understand what he was trying to say
I also heard "terrorists." ;D
"I'm not going to talk about the election."
...
proceeds to talk about several elections.
Yes, but not the election, THE is the golden word here. XD
Nathan Brown lol, I see what you did there, good joke.
You forgot talk about how Washington was a reptilain.
Whoops
:OO
You made me chuckle, take a like.
I'm the 200th like
I think Ireland is an example,there are 3 to 4 parties with independents,Its very interesting.(If Im wrong correct me).
How in the hell did 'anti-education' end up as a founding ideal of any party?
F*ck school apparently
I would assume more vocational based education = 'anti-education'
I'd assume it's actually against funding of schools from tax-payers money.
***** In all honesty, I much prefer vocational programs for post-junior high school students that caters to their preferences rather than throwing numerous sh*t at them not gaining their interest. Dropout rates would probably be even lower if students had the chance to study more of their criteria and not what is recommended by the government (math and reading being the primary requirements).
Not similar to Federalists but education for the past generations are more of "control" -type atmosphere.
Math & literacy are too fundamental to being competent in society for them to be considered government extras.
2 videos in one day? Cody, I officially am in love with you.
I don't see a second video today.
It's on AlternateHistoryHub
that was from yesterday
ok
Adam Hauskins Well, for me that was today
Second best hub on the internet
jack.l.h Right behind cornhub
Shaqrifice which is right behind Pornhub
ALTERNATE HISTORY HUB ^o^
jack.l.h
Huehueheu
Sees something he doesn't like?
Alexander Bannin' It
ayy
my man
Swiggity Swag Pot is legal? Alexander Blazin' It
Eli Daxter hey
Alexander Hamilton? 0:52 ...
He really likes KnowledgeHub.
Alexander knowledgeton
Sorry but Team Johnny and Team Jeff Jeff, killed me
Hey Cody....talk about the election
PyroEnderSlayer bad
PyroEnderSlayer bad jimmy
Aw
PyroEnderSlayer no, bad
BAD BAD VERY BAD JIMMY
Multi-Part? How dare you! You can only upload 2 parts!
Konrad gotta love that toalking
It's a two party system. ;)
Coolcleverstone
This series is trapped in a 2 part system
Man, it's like stepping into a time warp watching a video like this on this channel considering what it's like now. From Cody's secondary channel to Tyler's digital mantel, it's changed for the...stranger. Thumbs up 9/10.
I still don't understand how the Democrats and Republicans completely switched views.
Roosevelt. Roosevelt happened
I think that's why he said these aren't the modern parties
It's a result of the two parties trying to garner votes from different sects than what they were prior in the mid and late-twentieth century. For example: republicans reached out to the evangelicals, democratics reached out to minorities.
Prickly Cucumbers I think that might be the most sensical explanation I've ever heard.
Thanks, I read that in a few places and it makes a lot of sense. It's mostly a struggle for different voting blocks in politics, it seems.
This channel teaches so much more than highschool did lol
Ugh, finally someone who doesn't talk about the election
egw esu no election? he talked about alot of elections :P
Ty Stevens yeah, but not the current one
Well why not? As long as it isn't bias'd i'd be aight with that.
Good luck with a bias free life
Every person is biased
Every news channel, paper, and talking-head has a bias.
+Melissa Jackson I've seen unbiased videos speaking about the topic. They give equal credibility to all parties and tell you to make your own conclusions.
Keyword- "equal credibility". A lot of videos don't do this, But i'm speaking of the rare un-baised videos which do exist!
"I killed the bank." - Andrew Jackson
Andrew Jackson is my favorite president for that simple reason... yes, he had slaves (not uncommon in his day) and yes he committed atrocities against indigenous peoples, but killing the bank makes him my favorite... you know when they try to assassinate you twice, you're doing something right!
Drew Joaquin or the people just really hate you
Matthew Collins that could be true too!
In other words, the political election is a 'been there done that, got the button' and were doing it again sort of thing.
This literary chapter 1-9 in my ap history book. Thank you so much for the review!
When he said “I’m not going to talk about the election” I didn’t even realize at first that he meant the 2016 election and not 2020.
This is by far the best video about this topic on UA-cam.
Well thank you so much. Explains well the change in parties over the time of this Era.
Best video yet Codie. Cannot wait until part 2
Oh god I love History and me discovering this channel is like picking up free weed
Wait so did the Whigs have anything to do with the Whigs in Britain (modern day Lib-Dems)
Louis Hypothetical not really. there isnt a connection over the atlantic in a literal sense.
Louis Hypothetical They were inspired by their ideals because the British Whigs actually supported the initial American revolution.
Things that would truly make America great again:
1) Bringing back the federalist party
or
2) Abandoning the party system
NewName AGREED
What? Abandon the party system and force people to defend or promote policy ideas based only on their merit? That's crazy enough that it just might work.
In a modern metaphor Hilary was Quincy and Trump was Jackson (both sharing positive and negative traits.)
It would be the opposite, with Hillary winning the popular vote but Trump the presidency.
Pancake not in votes (you are correct there) I meant ideologically.
Trump's a populist though, he appeals to (some of) the people and purposely pisses off the elites.
Brendan O'Brien Then that'd be more or less correct, yea.
BAD JIMMYS
I thought this video was going to be about elections. I guess I got more than I expected.
Video smacks 👌🏼 Thanks for the excellent review and my A in government
I love these political videos by these guys that aren't biased and simply talk about history
There needs to be a 3rd popular party so we don't get another year like this.
ever heard of green and libertarian.
MattWizo Just like when Teddy ran with his own party, look how well that turned out.
I think there should be enough parties to representate all the ideas... Like the democrats should split up into capitalists and socialdemocrats and stuff..
Rawr all ideas. Even shit like facism?
Gary Johnson's Libertarian party kind of cost Clinton Flordia, since that 2% likely would've gone to her had he not run. It's called the spoiler effect -- once two major parties are large enough, it's pretty much impossible for a third party to run without giving a major candidate a leg-up. We had so many different parties pre-1860 because the country was young enough; now it's much harder with First Past the Post to get third parties in the spotlight.
#Notificationsquadhere
Il Capitalista hello
Whazz up?
Please do more bro. I'm gonna get a 5 on my ap exam with your vids coupled with my study habits😂😂😂
Slick, a video about Jacksons presidency? Hell Mofoen yes, also can't wait till part 2!!
thank you for not talking about the election. and this topic is very interesting , I am impressed that you have been able to be so concise so far.
i love u man keep doing what u do
aye love ur channel man
0:53
Extreme missed opportunity to end on: "his right hand man!"
So, Cody, What'cha think 'bout them elections there?
900bot lol
Pardon me, sir, you forgot about Burr, you said Adams lost to Jefferson, but not Burr. In fact, sir, you barely mention third parties.
Ηι βγε because they're not all that important
Sam Dragonborn Oh yep he couldn't add it and take 15 more seconds
yea but burr's political life kinda ended when he killed alexander hamilton
it takes more than 15 seconds to explain burr and the third parties at this point
BalistaRanger At least mention they exist is what I'm saying
Jimmy's back!
You bastard..I was really into this video and just as it was starting to get to the meat and potatoes, it ended. Hurry up with part 2!!
good video
you should do a video on the UK before america and leading up to it, just an idea
"Braveheart" starring and directed by Mel Gibson
thanks ill write it down
Correction. Henry Clay had more popular vote than Crawford; it's the fact that he got the least electoral votes which was he was left out of consideration
I love these videos, Cody. More please. :]
I would like to congratulate you. This video is now being showed in history class. Because of I showed it to my teacher.
hail Washington.
dark leo the 2nd hail government of the early USA
dark leo the 2nd hail Washington hail Trump Make America Great Again
That moment when you realize that you've got both these old parties raging in your head every time you decide you care about something...
As a Canadian, I have a real hard time getting my head around US politics. Thanks for this man, keep 'em coming!!
Great stuff
Pretty insightful stuff. I never knew about most of this before.(I regret to say)
You just got yourself a new subscriber sir!
John Adams was not ousted because of the sedation act. He was ousted due to conflict with Alexander Hamilton who held most control of the Federalists. Adams was much more of a loner, who did not seek allies and friends to get his vision through. When he then began bickering with Hamilton over dissolving the newly formed American army, Hamilton withdrew his support and the Federalists did not support Adams a second term.
The Sedation act did not come out of nowhere. It was created because of ongoing tensions with Revolutionary France, who had made a series of provocative actions from the quasi war to the xyz affair. Jefferson's allies never stopped supporting France through all of this and became very unpopular because of it. Adam's administration tried to remain neutral, but France seemed more and more provocative and England seemed more level headed and was an important trading partner.
At the height of a possible outbreak of a war, the Alien and Sedation act was passed, with the people's support.
I was only watching alternet history hub and then when I found this, I was like o dam.
Politics is just a fancy word of saying "crook." That's all I need to know
Craft Squad B&N Division and neither courpt or a thief
Workers CCCP It is that too.
The second party in the United States was not actually democratic-republicans but actually anti-federalist. However it was quickly replaced with democratic republicans. As patriotic feelings started to grow stronger for the U.S. I'm not trying to rag on you I love your videos and think they are really informal.
Great video! Jackson himself deserves an in-depth look. You are a student of history so you understand when I say that the judgement of Jackson in modern times is typically based on surface information alone. He was pro-slavery and anti-Indian and immediately he is evil, but when you look a little deeper you invariably find those hidden gems of his personality and his life. He was and still is the quintessential American. Good and evil. The problem is that we modern people do not take the good with the bad, we just take the bad and that is historically irresponsible. So it is my hope that if you ever do delve more deeply into this subject that you continue on your path of truth and factual information, because it is too easy to become bogged down in the lesser angels of Andrew Jackson's nature.
Alternate History Episode idea - What if Alexander Hamilton had survived his Duel with Burr and led the Federalist Party down a different and more successful path?
For the people wondering about the anti education part.
you don't need much education (plus it was expensive, seemed needless, and at the time it was thought as a tool from Elitists and the Aristocracy to control the masses) when you are a poor farmer.
Team Johny vs Team Jeff Jeff
I look forward to part 2.
Alexander Hamilton(2x)
Got yourself a problem, he can Alexander handle it.
Yo! Cody you have a lot to get through:
James K. Polk being a Dark Horse winning the election
Modern Day Republican Party formation(1860)
Election of 1876
Theodore Roosevelt and Taft and Woodrow Wilson Election(Progressive Era)
FDR winning the 4 elections, being president for 12 years
Democrats and Republicans switching sides in (1964)
Jimmy Cater and Ronald Regan!
TY Cooper I like Ronald Reagan
Yo don't forget Nixon's landslide in 1972
Wow, this is the best like ratio for a video about politics I have ever seen
Nice, in the end of video is painting and it show Gdańsk, called "Gdańsk w XVII w. 1865" by Wojciech Gerson.
Politics? On UA-cam? You deserve a medal for bravery.
What led me to this vedio is a presentation . Although I hate everything related to politics,but I am obliged to do my work
That ending song fits very well with the current situation for the US :P
good god i love this
You've mentioned ALEXANDER HAMILTON!!!!
Now time to wait 2 months until the next episode...
What I learned from this video is:
1. That 2016 wasn't the first time a Clinton lost a presidential election
2. American politics have been "peaceful" before
3. 2016 wasn't the first crazy election
4. 2016 wasn't the first time a candidate accused another candidate of corruption
5. 2016 wasn't the fist time where supporters of one candidate hatted the other
6. 2016 wasn't the first time where the popular candidate lost
7. Jacksonian democrats are now trump republicans
first words were blessed and I love them. 1+
good idea to not talk about the election to hot of a topic. love watching your videos
THANK YOU for not talking about the election. I love politics and even I'm starting to get a freaking headache.
Good shit.
More knowledge... MORE KNOWLEDGE
Politics and Governance in a general status is about many times deciding through Majoritarianism, Elitism, Pluralism, and Beuracratic Law or Rule. Are main Governmental Formalization's are Democracy, Constitutionalism, and Capitalism. Government Funding's have varying results.
4:31 2020 hold my beer
Hey Cody, you should talk about the election.
With politics being my life, this is the perfect video.
Cody, just a minor correction to the Jacksonian Democrats; the principals the party was based on where codified by Martin Van Buren in New York in 1819 as a result of the Missouri Comprimise and how it might affect his dispute of control of New York (state) politics with De Witt Clinton. (And no, he wasn't a relation of the Clintons (as far as I know).)
Nice!
good vid
I heard that a scholar said that the Era of Good Feelings was an era for unity rather than of, if you want to know what I mean, look up VolksMarshall in Paradox Interactive Forums.
good shit homie
Can you tell about political parties of Italy
This was the era of Burkean Conservatism, Classical Liberalism and radicalism. The US being far more independent minded would resist elitists controlling govt and both the Federalists and the National Republicans fell into this trap. A similar thing happened 100 years prior in Britain where the tories seemed to not adapt to the post Lockian world of Hanoverian Britain. Only the division of the British Whigs just like the DRs here would create a new two party system. Though the more Conservative faction would be called Tories it was a retroactively imposed descriptor that Pitt the younger and contemporaries rejected.
It's interesting just how far those parallels go. The Tories and Federalists were both ultimately done in by becoming associated with treason in the popular consciousness. While most Tories to my knowledge were Hanoverians following the Glorious Revolution, it didn't take with a number of them who wound up supporting the Jacobite rising of 1715 which allowed the party to be marginalized and allow for the period of Whig supremacy. And during the War of 1812, not all but a group of Federalists pushed for New England to secede from the Union and negotiating a separate peace with Britain at the Hartford Convention which destroyed the party's reputation and usher in the Era of Good Feelings dominated by the Democratic-Republicans. Perceived allegiance with the Jacobites and British confirming to the minds of their enemies the long-held suspicions that they were reactionaries at heart seeking to subvert their nation's revolutionary progress. And similarly to how Pitt's camp was referred to as Tories by their Foxite opponents which they rejected with the claim that they were independent Whigs, Henry Clay's faction that founded the National Republicans before becoming the core of the American Whig Party was cast as a continuation of the Federalists by their Jacksonian rivals which they denied by insisting that they protected the Republican tradition. Despite these preconceptions, they naturally assumed the same roles that the previous conservative parties had occupied in a lot of ways while being much more amenable to the developing democratic systems. Though there's undoubtedly quite a bit of nuance to all this, the comparison between the two is a really useful lens to apply when trying to understand the evolution of American politics.
2.40 5.00 history definitely rhymes.
7:42 it feels weird to see a photograph of Andrew Jackson, I guess I always forget that presidents still exist even after they leave office and that he could live long enough to have a photograph
USA USA USA USA USA
Lord Anthonyd vs world politics
merica fuc yeah
Um.....
WHAT????????????????
Lord Anthonyd you spelt it wrong its UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK UK
My god,the end song speaks too well for the election
XD nice start no no election ;)
The forming of political parties was inevitable
heyyyy that's pretty good
Anyone else was reminded by the whole clay/jackson thing of sons of anarchy?
wow nice vido cody
great now I have all of the second half of Hamilton in my head again , again , again x2000 times :p
It’s incorrect to say that the party called “Democratic Republican” (technically simply “Republican”) has no relation to either of today’s two parties. In fact, historians and political scientists largely consider it direct predecessor, if not simply the first iteration, of what is now called the Democratic Party. To this day, the Democratic Party itself also claims its start in 1792 by Jefferson and Madison, not in 1828 by Jackson and Van Buren. As you somewhat reference, the modern GOP on the other hand, is more indirectly (but nevertheless there’s a connection there) descended from the fractured remnants of the Whig Party, itself a direct successor to the National Republican Party, an again indirect successor to the Federalist Party and nationalist Adams-Clay minority of Republicans. So you make the connections more or less well in the video, but get hung up on the name change from Republican to Democratic Republican to Democratic.