Canon FINALLY DID IT…but with a CATCH!!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 тра 2024
- This FIX is brought to you by Squarespace. I've been using Squarespace for over 10 years now and I think you should give it a try as well. Get your 14 day trial at HTTP://squarespace.com/froknowsphoto If you decide it's for you, use the code FroKnowsPhoto at checkout to get 10% off your first order.
FROPACK4 is HERE with 14 all-new custom Lightroom presets!!! Check it out
froknowsphoto.com/fropack4/ (40% OFF)
This week we have stories about a Canon Global Shutter being put up for sale. Sigma updates two E Mount Lenses to allow them to shoot at 120 Frames Per Second. And finally, Canon has officially opened up the RF mount to Sigma and Tamron but there's still a catch. This is YOUR Photo News Fix!!!
Listen to RAWtalk, the FroKnowsPhoto Podcast wherever you listen to your podcasts. Or head on over to froknowsphoto.com/podcast
This video was filmed with the Canon EOS R5 and RF Canon Lenses Canon.us/r5fro
Order a Bernie Photo Book right here www.berniephotobook.com/buy
Download MyGearVault, it's FREE and the best way to keep track of all your camera gear, receipts, prices paid, date purchased and more mygearvault.com/#download
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.com/ (look for the orange box)
Want to send us gifts, swag, letters...here's our P.O. BOX
PO Box 3715 Philadelphia, PA 19125
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com/froknowsphoto to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts store.froknowsphoto.com/
I support Allen's Camera a mom-and-pop Camera store that's been around since 1977. allenscamera.com/fro
Follow me
►UA-cam: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.com/guides
#FroKnowsPhoto #JaredPolin #PhotoNewsFix
I'm pretty sure at 4:35 and 5:43 he said tampon and not Tamron. Glad I am not the only one that heard it.
🫵📷Got you, Bi!
Tampon, brought to you by auto correct & teleprompters.
😂@@daniellove162
@@WildAlberta How many times did he say 'meow?'
he did that xD
"Tampon" and Sigma...lol
😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
That's what I heard.
Twice! 😂
The lens i most want to see on RF: Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8
Canon won't let that lens on the system just yet because they don't want real competition
Did he say : "Tampon" in 4:35 ? :D :)
yep
@@calabashphotography1234 lol
Yes he did 😂
he did it again at 5:42. lol
4:33 Fro said tampon instead of tamron 😭
cue your best Beavis and Butt-head imitation
He knew full well what he said.
Tampon. Wahahahahahah. Im crying . Thats so Funny. Though I was the only one that refered to those bloody lenses as TAMPON Lenses 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
BLOODY 🩸🩸🩸
I had to go back and makes sure I heard it right 😂😂😂
@@PhiTheProducer even me. Then I kept replaying it and found it funnier and funnier the more I watched it 🤣🤣
He only did it like every other time just to mess with us lol
@@PhiTheProducersame
😂😂😂
Welp, just like that, Tamron will never be able to produce enough marketing to undo what just happened to them! LOL
😂
Tamron RF 35-150mm F/2-2.8 and I need new glass 🤩 I am waiting for that!
I'd love to see the 60-600 Sport
For the Canon RFmount: Sigma 70-200 f2.8 Sports and a Sigma 200-500 f4 Sports
Of all the photo news/rumors channels I watch, yours is the only one that has touched on Cannon’s global shutter announcement. Thank you!
Matt Irwin talked about Canon's global shutter also.
@@natureredux1957then it means he doesnt follow matt 😃
@@natureredux1957 Thanks! New channel to follow…
My R7 is very happy about this news. I use
I'd like to see some Art series lens. Like the 18-35 f1.8 or 50-100 f1.8 with RF mount. The former one is amazing lens even with an adapter. But it would be slighlty more compact with an RF mount.
It really would not be much more compact unless they redesigned it optically.
I used the 18-35 F1.8 recently on my R7 and I was actually in love with it
I use the 18-35 on my mft camera with a speed booster, which puts it at F1.2. Works great for astrophotography and video.
I was a Nikon user for 30 years, became a Canon R5 user for my first mirrorless and when the R5 II was announced at 45mp, I jumped to medium format.... which for me is perfect!
Can't wait for those Tampon lenses
10-18 sigma is exactly what I needed for my R7, very happy about the news 😊
I still use a Canon 5Div, at at my age I’m unlikely to go mirrorless. On the plus side as Canon users get swap the EF lenses for mirrorless lenses, quality EF second hand lenses are coming on to the market.
I currently use a Sigma 18-50 EF adapted on my R7 and I'm pretty happy with it. If Sigma wants to give me a trade option, I'll be happy to test out their RF mount version.
At the moment, though, all my glass is EF adapted, so I just leave the adapter on the body. If I start going back and forth, I could end up getting confused on what's where, and while that's definitely a me-problem, it's still a problem.
Hilarious!!!!! I loved the Goonies cut with Chunk 😂😂😂 3:22
100-400, 150-600, 70-200 alternatives, sigma FF art line (85, 50, 35 and 24) 17-70 Tamron for APS-c
Mostly just want affordable quality for hobbyists/prosumer.
I’m not sure this means much for full frame. Canon basically said, sure, you can make high quality APS-C lenses, as we’re not interested in ever doing that..
I love the sigma 18-50 for a lil travel lens
My R7 shoots 15/30 even on my adapted Sigma 18-35 f1.8, which I wish would get the RF treatment. Canon doesn't seem to cripple 3rd party lenses. Their 50-100 f1.8 would be cool in RF too. But I will definitely be waiting for Sigma's 24-70 and 150-600C
I always come to you FIRST for my photo news fix! :-)
I have an R7, so this is good news for me. I like the compactness and light weight of the current Canon RF-S lenses. But I will probably pick up the Sigma 23mm 1.4 for when I need a faster lens, or want to get a more shallow depth of field. What I would like to see is a 20mm or 24mm, f2.0 or f2.8 pancake lens. I already have the TTArtisan 25mm lens, but that is not autofocus.
I started with a Canon crop sensor camera and bought full frame EF lenses. That decision saved $$$ and allowed an easy transition to a full frame body. I still shoot DSLR.
whew, kind of good news it seems. would like to see that Tamron 35-150 f2/2.8 on RF mount; that mounted up my R3 would be amazing. but all the standard primes from Sigma could be nice too, 35/50/85/135 would be great as well, but here's to thoughts and prayers.
Canon had like 2 aps-c lenses when they closed the mount, leaving customers no option like that was just insane
"well you guys can shut up now and stop complaining.."
~ fro wtf
@@simonmaduxx6777that’ll never happen bro. Team son son forever broski.
You're kidding, right? Canon had a bunch of dedicated EF-S lenses plus ALL of the EF lenses which were completely compatible.
@@kevins8575 If I am buying into a new system I want to have native lens options.
Canon just pulled the most anti-consumer bullshit ever and there are still people who will go out and defend it.
@@kevins8575 efs... Lol those not in production for years.. copium AF
You want to use an ancient 17-55 2.8 made for dslr
The two of my most wanted list are
24- 70mm f2.8 from Tampon/ Tamron 😬
85mm f1.4 art lens from Sigma
I laughed out loud like 5 times. Good stuff. Thanks Jared and Mr. Editor. XD
I saw this the other day. While im new to the camera world. I got a r50, and love it. I just hate the kit lens for what I use it for. I will be for sure buying the 18-50 once it comes out.
I've got an R50 and the RF-S 18-150 is a pretty nice lens. Just sayin' in case you're looking for a wide range. That said, I would expect Tamron and Sigma to come out with similar ranges pretty soon.
@@HikingBob if I could find that in a 2.8 I would be happy. I shoot vlogs, and makeup stuff. Ecen with my lights. It's hard to zoom in because of the apture
Would love to see the 60 to 600 sigma on the rf mount.
Wow i didnt expected canon to open the rf mount! Also hahaha he said tampon again :D
He said tampon lenses lol
Er, where do you mount those?
They need to release the Sigma 150-600 for the full frame R mount, brilliant lens but needs updating for Canon mirrorless.
Would love to see a Sigma 24-105 F2.8 Art lens but more focused on the photography end of things rather than on videography cinematography.
Love the native version but it’s catering too much towards video work than actual photography.
I'll be getting the 16mm f1.4 for my R7. But what I'd like to see is the 150-600 sigma and the 35-150 f2.0-2.8 tampon. It's a good first step. I don't understand why Canon doesn't create mid level glass themselves. It's almost all L or Kit.
This is good news for Canon RF APS-C users. Canon, as usual, refused to make anything but consumer-grade lenses for their APS-C lineup. Given that, it's perfectly reasonable for to open this up to companies that will make enthusiast and/or pro-grade glass for APS-C RF cameras.
Canon doesn't give a fuck about their customers...that much is clear.
@@davepastern Calm down. They're selling plenty.
@@HikingBob Sony is killing Canon from a tech point of view and catching them in sales. Many people are unhappy with Canon's behaviour and rightly so. If I only had 1 or maybe 2 lenses on an entry level body, I'd have fucked Canon off and moved to a competitor.
@@davepastern Agreed - Alway shot Canon - getting the R5 when I did was a mistake and encourage anyone else not to fall into the trap
@@sydneylens I have too much invested in Canon gear to swap sadly. The thing is, Canon's menus are the best imho and also their button UI too. Nikon has their weird AF system that is just, well, weird. That would drive me crazy. Nikon and Sony need to up their UI game big time. Feature and spec wise, they spank Canon. Performance wise, they both do that too, although to be fair to Canon, the Nikon Z8 (direct competitor to the R5) is 3 years younger. Even then, Canon is only probably going to match the Z8 with the R5II - that's not encouraging. I have been saying for quite some time that Canon is not only behind Sony in the sensor wars, but falling further behind. Sony is toying with them. I can imagine Sony dropping a A1II with a global shutter at 50mp a month or 2 after Canon drops its 45mp BSI stacked R1 lol.
That is great news . I was looking at Fuji and nikon to buy a small aps-c camera as a second system everyday camera cause canons rfs line sucked. But now they have all the lenses i need and i dont have to have two different systems
Start reading those reviews again of the r7 r10 and r50. See if they have what you need.
I don't like any of the three but then again I'm not ready for upgrading my m62 with sigma 30mm lens yet anyway. I'm preparing for if this ever goes belly up. If Nikon can update the z30 to a mark 2 I'd probably still go with that just for options away from canon. Lesson learned.
I want to see for Canon Tamron 35-150 zoom 2-2.8 I use the Tamron 35-150 zoom 2.8-4 for Canon DSLR. I love it.
FINALLYYYYY
well, doesn't help me with my R8, but now hope is rekindled
Hi Jared, About a year ago, I switched to Sony from my Canon DSLR because of the lens options and budget, no regrets still
I did the same but the moment they put out a proper camera (R5 successor) and Sigma makes glass for it, I'm jumping back
Yea, I'll never go back to Canon. Switching to Sony was the best decision.
Sorry Canon.. too little, too late!
@@dannycastro1826 I can totally see why. Only reasons I would jump back is color science preference and ef glass for film cameras
Instead of Global Shutter and more speed I would like to finally see a noticeable image quality improvement in sensors. There haven’t been any big advances in a decade or so. When does a ISO6400 image finally look like it was taken at ISO800? How about more bits per colour channel in RAW footage? When will there be an alternative to Bayer and XTrans like technologies which don’t require interpolation? Still have high hopes for Foveon, but it will likely have noise limitations.
is there any news about Canon, Tamron or Sigma releasing a multiplier that fits the 75-200 f2.8 RF lens?
I love the new refined Howard Stern haircut. Looks cool
This was hilarious Jarid!!! Lmaoooo 😂😂😂
Sigma and Tamron lenses in RF mount will be cool, but I'm still hoping we eventually get those neat cheap Chinese lenses that have crazy apertures.
Why does the canon inner stabelizer makes impossible to shoot video with tird party lenses? The image stars to “quick”. Is there a way to make us buy only canon lenses? Have you heard it before?
I'm not a pro photographer and hope for a native 24-105 f4. I just have the EF version but the adapter suc*s and 1300 bucks to replace a lens I already have is to mutch for me,...
Im on sony, i want to switch back to Canon. Is a good ideea or not ?
If your current gear doesn't do the job, What you want to buy from Canon can do the job, if you have the finances for it, and if it's what you want, you should just do it.
@@JohnDoe-xm1irthe best answer
Where does the Sony not produce good enough results? Canon, Nikon and Sony all produce excellent cameras it’s very easy to be seduced by apparent ‘better’ but ends up just being different. Billions of great images have been taken and will continue to be taken by cameras without eg. ‘global’ shutters.
Pentax dude.
@@russellbaston974it’s the feeling for a lot of people that’s brought up this issue. When people switched from canon (or Nikon) to Sony, they lost their ergonomics and the feeling of the camera especially if you have larger hands. The feeling is different and some people don’t get used to it. Then there’s the system layout… that tends to be the biggest issue for people wanting to switch back to their old system. Sonys layout is a lot better now, but it’s still not as intuitive as most people would like to believe. There are some other things to, but overall that’s the reason why. There are times that people using Sony cameras don’t want to pick up their cameras and don’t feel inspired by their cameras. Believe it or not it’s the little things that Sony can do to improve that could make things better. Canon, Nikon and especially FujiFilm have better interfaces and pay more attention to connecting the photographer to the camera with the little things they do to make using their cameras easier.
It's a good start (allowing 3rd party lenses). I'm not sure if I'll be buying any new glass for my R7 since getting an R6-MkII a few months ago. It's not a very big slice of the Canon pie for Sigma and Tamron to make APS-C lenses for Canon right now. Maybe if Canon comes out with an R7-MkII soon, but I just don't see a lot of Canon compatible APS-C lenses getting sold. I hope I'm wrong. I like Sigma and their quality for the money.
Personally, i'll likely be buying almost all of those lenses. I've been kicking myself for not buying a Fuji for the longest time. We've desperately needed good 2.8 zooms that weren't L prices, and now we've got them!
Tampon Lenses are going to be weather sealed?
What to expect in Tamron and Sigma to release? Their iteration of "One Lens to Rule them All" on RF mount or Nikon's Z mount.
Global shutter is cool. Global shutter without any dynamic range loss? I think Nikon with RED's technology will bring it to market before Sony can.
It’s a start. As an amateur R6 shooter I’d still like some third party lenses but now they’ve agreed there is nothing wrong with the idea in principle, it’s only a matter of time.
I would like to see the Sigma 14mm f/1.4 lens on the RF mount.
Bless from Aruba!
Humid day in the studio? Fro lookin a little less voluminous than usual.
I had to run it back 😂😂 he definitely said it on purpose
R50 📸 ..sigma 16mm 30mm 56mm 1.4 rf; when will they be available?
Not a big fan of Canon mirrorless or tampons. I’ll stick with my 5D Mark IV for some more years to come.
I have the r10 and would love to see a 70-200.
Third party lenses shooting 120fps. Great I would like Sony to make more than 2 camera series that shoot 20 fps. How about a competitor to the z8. I'm struggling with only 8fps with Sony glass
Sigma & Tampon eh? I take it that Albaad or Tampax will be sponsoring future Photo News Fixes, in place of CircularSpace?
Rivals of Fro will shout out T AAAAAAAAAMPOOOOOON ...Just like the way he does his L Mount echo ...
I have said this since day one. The Day that Canon allows 3rd party manufactures to start making glass for their RF system is the day they jump ahead of Sony. The only two things really seperating Canon and Sony right now is how big Canon continues to make their RF bodies. They are starting to get just as big as DSLRs and the ability to purchase lenses from so many other manufactures. Now that canon is starting that process, and will start allowing users to purchase more then the Canon RF glass with more available options, Canon is gonna be the King of the mirrorless world now. The one big thing that seperated them both was the amount of available and AFFORDABLE glass.
Yet ANOTHER reason for me to STAY within the EF sphere...Canon HATES money!!! 🤣
If third party glass is your make or break for a system then Canon isn't making money off you anyway.
@@mikegreenwalt7777 dumb take
@@simonmaduxx6777 Got a rebuttal or did that hamster spinning that wheel die after the effort expended to type those 2 words?
@@mikegreenwalt7777 You made a statement that doesn't make much sense.
Canon has lost many customers because they lack options. Those are Potential customers (or keeping them).
Im selling my r62 for a panny s52. L mount will give me options Canon won't offer. Simple as that. My workhorse lens is the EF 50 1.4. Canon hasn't updated to RF mount. So my options are cheap nifty 50 or the bulky 2200.0 50mm 1.2. Thats ridiculous. Almost every single third party made a new 50 mm 1.4 in the last 6 months or so. But.. not Canon. Madness.
So I'll spend my canon money on another brand. My existing EF glass will be used for my r5. How do they win in that scenario? I WANT to buy an updated version and they won't make it. There current arent any 1.4 lenses for canon. But they sure have time for 3000.00 specialty lenses most won't buy (except for rental houses).
So .. again, what you wrote doesn't make .. any kind of sense. 'They werent gonna be customers anyways ' thinking is terrible business at best and at worst is awfully childish.
Sorry.
@@mikegreenwalt7777no bro it’s a dumb take because when you think about it bro… sigma is kind of like Canon bro, but they’re not because they are a different company, bro! So it all makes sense when you don’t think about it bro. I was talking to this lady bro once and she was a cool lady bro, bro. And she was talking to me about how much she made which was awesome bro. And I was like go ahead on lady bro and she was like yeah but that doesn’t mean you get anything. And I understood that bro! I really did. But I just kept thinking. What if that lady bro had to pay me royalty rights like if we got married, then divorced and since that lady bro makes more money than me. She’d have to pay me royalty rights or alimony or something. I’m sure it’s the same case with canon. Sigma is like the lady bro and canon is like me bro. The lady bro sigma, would have to pay me (the original bro) royalty rights like I’m canon! Does that make sense bro. But honestly, I don’t know if that’s going to happen. That lady bro was kind of a meany head so that’s not my cup of tea bro. Anyway bro… hope that helps! Keep it you, Bro!
I'm guessing the Canon 3rd party APS-C lenses can be used on FF set to 1.6x crop? My R3 would drop from 24MP to 9.3MP, an R5 would drop to 17.3MP. So maybe an idea for people with a FF that want one or two lenses that are only available in APS-C rather than buy an RF APS-C body just to get the cheaper lenses?. I just did some full Moon shots at APS-C crop as I'd have had to crop anyway, my R3 looking through my 9.25" telescope. I couldn't tell the difference between images using internal crop or software crop. Quite a few wildlife shooters use 1.6x too, and always seem happy with the results.
I have this same question, what happens when you put one of these 3rd party APS-C RF-mount lenses on a Canon full-frame camera? I mean, both Canon's APS-C cameras and full frame cameras have the same RF mount. I'm guessing since the lens is designed for a smaller sensor it will clip the resulting image?
Sigma 18-50 f2.8 on the Red Komodo... yaaaaaassss!!!!
There was a guy on the sonyalpha subreddit that was getting cooked for saying tampon instead of tamron and I'm glad it made its way here
I am so happy for my R10
Nikon did global shutter 20 years ago with the 6MP D70. No one noticed that their 10MP D200 couldn't do it in 2005.
That “Tampon” lens brand will absorb more light leaks than Sigma, without a doubt.
Tamron had a great lineup of EF lenses, which you could have easily used on an RF mount with an adapter. The sad part is that they are not produced any more. Not even the great Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 IS.
I would not call Sigma lenses cheap. They just cost less although they are sometimes better than the Canon versions. A Sigma lens also has the advantage that Sigma allows you to change the mount for a moderate fee. I do not see a reason to buy a Canon RF lens that will only work on Canon cameras with no options to convert it into an E-Mount of Z-Mount lens.
Pretty sure the 15fps limit has always been for AF-C.
Not releasing at least one full frame lens is super annoying. I have had my R3 since launch and I have a few RF lenses. They better be cooking up something good to be focusing on RF-S lenses first.
With an r3 you should only use RF glass
@@froknowsphoto yeah that’s all I use. I would like tamron and sigma rf glass. Not these “heavy accent” *puny* crop sensor lenses
@@froknowsphoto You should do a video of blind test of RF vs decent 3rd party manual focus lenses and see if you can tell the difference between them. I'm curious, I know I'd never be able to tell. But i'm not a pro, so..
Would love a 400 F2.8, 500mmf4 and 600mmf4 with rf mount
I have been waiting for canon to allow 3rd party lenses on APSC. They just don’t have good options for APSC users, so overall a win, just very late
I miss Roberta
Yes!
Bro! I look at Roberta L and think… WOULD!
85 1.4/1.2 from Sigma and not from tampon for Canon full frame ... waiting
Make sense to start with APSC
Most people own cheaper APSC
Canon RF glass is expensive, even the lower end. To target amateurs to give the a better priced option also make sense.
RF APSC lacks good glass. Tamron and Sigma will pickup Canon's slack
Ffs Jared
I shown my mum the intro to this video because i think the dragged out letters and things are funny, but I didn’t notice the “rude gesture” (or maybe you were just throwing a dart!) before you pointed at the camera 😂😂🤦♂️
Color me confused as I am mostly skimming (honestly the cutaway humor stuff drives me nuts) but why are the new Sigma lenses not suitable for Full Frame ... mainly the 10-18 which can come in handy for real estate stuff.
Were the “Tampon” mentions intentional? Lol I counted at least 2 😂
From a business sense it makes sense for canon to hold off on allowing third party as they fill in their own lenses like who and try to recoup r&d costs asap. But it does have a few year paining consumers.
The aps-c opening first makes sense since most people getting into the aps-c lineup are people just beginning into photography with a “real” camera, so they aren’t going to want to buy anything expensive. It makes sense for sigma and tampon to just into that field first.
I’m sure canon will open up full frame in the next year or two.
If they don’t it will spell more trouble for them more likely than not. Can’t be all greed all the time.
The problem with that also is that they didn't fill in anything. They pretty much made the worst versions of almost every lens they brought out. You couldn't really sell cheaper and slower lenses than what they possibly created for crop. Every lens got downgraded, the 24 to 50 is a lens meant for no one and is not even glass, the worst 18 to 55 ever.. they were trying to get awards for making trash products. Some of the lenses also use digital stretching to make a proper image.. so they cheaped out for the glass even on the cheap lenses.
They'll probably make more money off of sigma selling lenses royalties that nobody buying their garbage lenses.
Even worse they didn't bring out the 22 mm f2. Talk about super insulting to their customers. And then he talked it all off and just said it was a business decision in terms of keeping third party off.
Whatever the Japanese version of wanker is, can an executives earn that title. Morons.
You're a funny guy, Fro.
4:35 - he got used to it :D
I wanted the Tamron and Samyang lenses like 35+150mm f2-2.8 or 24-180mm f2-2.8 or 24-200mm f2-2.8 or new F4 lenses like 24-200mm F4 or 24-400mm F or F5.6 for traveling lenses.
Tampon, man you are crazy 🤣
Great Video!!
tamron 28-75 VXD G3 L USM RF Boom!
The real question is, are we still gonna be Canon users by the time full frame third party lenses are available?
This means that probably we will see the legendary sigma 18-35mm f1.8 with an r7 soon.
lol, tampon, i had to rewind to check if it was real :P
I use two R7s this is great news 🤣
We need a tamron 24-70 f2.8 G3 for the RF mount
Bro. That’s true and that’s probably an awesome lens bro. But honestly… I think you need to invest in that 24-105 f/2.8 bro. Why you might ask? Then I’d say… “why not bro? Why not”.
But that’s pretty much how the story goes bro. For any other additional questions please make sure to reach out to your local librarians! When you’re ready bro… when you’re ready!
@@anthonyt1427 🤣🤣🤣
Librarians
But that 24-105 is actually the 1 lens to rule them all
@@dubbleA100it rules bro… it rules! Trust me bro…
@@dubbleA100it’s such a great lens.
Those tampon lens's might be kinda soft around the edges.
At 4:35 he said tampon instead of tamron :))
bring that global sensor to the r5 mark ii and I'm in
How about a Tamron 400 2.8?
Might as well title this video Tampon cuz thats all anyone cared about or heard including me 😂😂😂😂 10/10 Jared.