PLEASE get this man on camera. It's amazing seeing everyone because you get to see the excitement, animation of their hands, everything. It's so much more engaging. Great interview like always.
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is my favorite Tarantino film. It’s so rich and enjoyable. There are new things I notice every time. I can watch it over and over and it’s still so enthralling. I wish there were more movies like that because it leaves me craving more.
So it's not a reupload? Meaning this podcast was never on UA-cam? I'm asking because the only ReelBlend content I see is on UA-cam, so if this is first time on UA-cam then I didn't see it.
Quentin is such a bro. He's a great filmmaker but he was also a film nerd for years. For all his youth. He worked at a local blockbuster type store quizzing people on their film knowledge. He's just a really grounded, passionate guy and I think it stands out when you're talking about other directors in his league.
Best interview with Tarantino I've heard yet. Your team does a good job of balancing focused questions and forward conversational momentum with leaving QT the space to think about the questions and give them fulsome responses
I've been up Cielo Drive in a work truck and even drove down it backwards because there wasn't a lot of spots to turn around. That was fun but nerve racking.
THE BOYS ARE BACK AGAIN WITH A BANGER ! Love your guys banter and connection with Tarantino. Sean you weren’t lying when you said a big episode was coming up ! Keep it up boys
The access Tarantino provides is amazing, the guy is unhindered by ego. His movie reviews are too insightful, I always have to rewatch after hearing his take on things.
I always remember being so excited when this episode was originally released and I've listened to it countless times now. The insightful questions that these guys ask and the depth of response from Quentin is just enthralling as a filmmaker and film geek. An interesting retrospective thing I noticed: when QT is talking about the "misadventure" for Cliff Booth...*spoilers ahead if you haven't read the book, you've been warned*...........................when I first heard this episode, to me, it felt like QT was placing more emphasis on option two which is that it was an accident. That was always the interpretation that I was most convinced of, and it sounded to me like he was most convinced of it too. So it was fascinating to find out in the book that it's actually option one. There's still enough wiggle room for ambiguity though, as Cliff questions "did I really do that on purpose? Was it just a trigger-twitch?" But either way, listening to this podcast now in light of the book is very interesting. It's also fun to think of Brad Pitt having read that chapter before they even started shooting, knowing that dark history for the character, because his performance is so easy and laidback that the darkness only creeps in at the subtlest of times. Great stuff, hope you guys bring QT back for more in-depth conversations!
I do agree with the shooting on film in a sense that I do really beleave that more you have to put work into it, better it comes out. There is the process of planning and ideas comes to make it a bit better and actors are even more prepared on point knowing they are otherwise wasting film etc. Like ok you can be a Fincher who tweaks everything to the max even with digital, takes many shots and it looks Great. Still there is so many who basically starts to shoot and are like ok we got the shot we wanted and the time for discovery is lost. There is not that pressure to often make it better from performance standpoint because the actor knows it's not As big deal to go again. That's a lot of the thing by going the harder route. It is like a route for exploring and the feeling of capturing the shot stays in the print. It is kinda the same as I just many times like some directors indie to mid budgeted movies more than the grandious big budget films. Because in some directors you just see that they really want certain things into the movie, so with the money they have it needs a lot of planning and commitment to get it Right. Like yes with big budget there is similar differend kinda things to go thru, but the missing money kinda often shows a real hunger to do with it something really catching. Kinda this see what I can do with the material even if the budget doesn't let me be overtly flashy with getting this and that equipment. The missing money forces to find a differend more difficult route to the same/similar result you wanted and it just often is better when it is kinda scraped with blood, sweat and tears of how to make it happen 😅 Also some directors just almost seems to forget how important the Mood is for a movie bigger the budget is. It can become just a row of set-pieces that can be very cool, but misses some soul in them. The point being that the feeling of the intensity of the process of something having been done crawling thru the mud vs an easy mode does in many cases come thru the screen to the watcher.
What if Tarantinos final movie is an anthology series similar to Pulp Fiction, and its sequences with the Vega Brothers, a showdown between the Bride and Vernita Greens daughter, and any other loose ends. It would be a satisfying coda to the career. Though it certainly won’t happen.
Quentin is saying that he prefers the "lit" look of classic Hollywood, when it was absolutely necessary to use lots of heavy lights just to expose the film. He also likes the process of filming, etc. But when you take the approach that the camera sensor is picking up enough image data to fix it in post you're not getting the full artistry of lighting to the frame on the set for every shot.
This interview hasn’t been uploaded to this channel yet, so taking the opportunity to get some of these older interviews on here for new folks, and people that want to revisit without searching far and wide. Hopefully, we have him back on soon though!
@ReelBlend oh. My bad. I guess I'm such a huge fan that I've already absorbed it as soon as it was available on ur other platforms back in the day, when it was brand spanking new, and I didn't even remember that it wasn't on this channel yet til now, lol. Luv you guys! ✌🏼💕🎸🎶🎥🎞🍿🎬📽
Quentin is lying... he's has/had a # 13 Tattoo in pale blue ink, on his neck near his ear... has he had it removed? Possibly??? ... but FACT in 1998 that neck tattoo was 100% Real!!!
Quentin obviously doesn't know a thing about lighting for digital. Deakins doesn't wanna spend time lighting? how ignorant can you be? Film is not more legitimate than digital, get over it.
@@Ben_Gunner Hi Ben, I LOVE QT. One of my favourite directors, period. I also love listening to him rant. 100%. I just hate people acting like they have authority on matters where they are extremely ignorant.
I've seriously always hated that movie lol. And it's not out of resentment on behalf of the movies up for the Oscar's that year that were much better. I just legitimately think it's the most overrated, overly sentimental Hollywood drivel to ever win best picture. But it is so on brand and fitting that it won that year over Pulp Fiction, a film that ignored all the conventions of story telling and it ends up losing to a movie that shamelessly embraced it.😂
@@StoneColdSteveAutism95 god honest truth: I watched Pulp Fiction the first week it came out in 1994. the theater was full. by the half way mark half of audience had left. at the end we were only 10 left. almost everybody went out. "boring. too violent. doesn´t make any sense", and so on. --- Forrest Gump, same thing: first week, theater full, nobody left. people were mesmerized by that film........ drivel maybe.... but drivel that works.... - Pulp is an experimental film. that is not oscar material. Forrest is basically a perfect film, a great story well told. Pulp is a flawed series of cool scenes. Boring as a whole piece, but great in certain moments. That is not Oscar material. you have to master the whole piece. ignoring all the conventions in itself does not necessarily make up for good storytelling.
@@of1300 Well thank goodness I don't have to rely on the Oscar's or anyone else to help me decide what qualifies as "good storytelling" lol. I'd much rather watch movies they consider to be "boring" or "too violent" like Leon the Professional or Pulp Fiction any day over something as formulaic and sappy as Forrest Gump.
@@StoneColdSteveAutism95 fair enough. Doesn’t make you any better or smarter not to see the qualities in Forrest, but that’s everybody’s right to choose their tastes in movies. I like Pulp Fiction a lot, by the way. I just don’t consider it Oscar material or perfect. That’s just my opinion, man.
@@of1300 No, I don't think liking or disliking a movie makes anyone smart or dumb at all, that I agree with. My issue with Forrest isn't that I think it's dumb, it's that I think it's typical Oscar bait type material which is my opinion. And I didn't think you disliked Pulp Fiction.
PLEASE get this man on camera. It's amazing seeing everyone because you get to see the excitement, animation of their hands, everything. It's so much more engaging. Great interview like always.
100 percent agreed! Quentin is a force of nature and watching his wheels turn as he engages in conversation is part of the magic.
Too much setup. Mics are just relaxed. My opinion.
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is my favorite Tarantino film. It’s so rich and enjoyable. There are new things I notice every time. I can watch it over and over and it’s still so enthralling. I wish there were more movies like that because it leaves me craving more.
Hard for me to pick a favorite, but I think it's the most rewatchable to me. Time will tell for sure.
It’s a rerun for those of you who think this is a new thing. Not a bad thing at all, I’m just saying 😎
So it's not a reupload? Meaning this podcast was never on UA-cam? I'm asking because the only ReelBlend content I see is on UA-cam, so if this is first time on UA-cam then I didn't see it.
they need to title it as so, feels click bait and got me excited for no reason.
🎉😅 31:53 @@TextureKing😢🎉🎉😮😮😮😢
@@TextureKing😮😅 39:36 😅 42:25
Yeah dude they said it very clearly in the intro
Quentin is such a bro. He's a great filmmaker but he was also a film nerd for years. For all his youth. He worked at a local blockbuster type store quizzing people on their film knowledge. He's just a really grounded, passionate guy and I think it stands out when you're talking about other directors in his league.
Best interview with Tarantino I've heard yet. Your team does a good job of balancing focused questions and forward conversational momentum with leaving QT the space to think about the questions and give them fulsome responses
Even with all his success and achievement, Quentin comes off as just a giant film geek. Nobody better to get into all the nerdy details with. 📽🍿❤
He has his own podcast now where him and roger Avery nerd out about movies...it's great to hear people as weird and obsessed as I am about movies.
What a great interview! I don't know how I missed this one.
I remember listening to this when it came out. Arguably my favorite Tarantino interview.
Brilliant interview with Quentin ❤
This is so badass, you guys have QUENTIN TARANFUCKINGTINO clinking tequila drinks with you. Amazing questions!
Still hard to believe it actually happened…
Thank you for listening! ❤️🎥🎞️
My favorite episode of yours so far. QT is a blast of cinema joy!
Imagine Tom cruise with his expert live stunts with Tarantino writing and directing!
I've been up Cielo Drive in a work truck and even drove down it backwards because there wasn't a lot of spots to turn around. That was fun but nerve racking.
THE BOYS ARE BACK AGAIN WITH A BANGER ! Love your guys banter and connection with Tarantino. Sean you weren’t lying when you said a big episode was coming up ! Keep it up boys
This episode is from 2019 and already existed before this reupload.
The access Tarantino provides is amazing, the guy is unhindered by ego. His movie reviews are too insightful, I always have to rewatch after hearing his take on things.
Wow how fantastic! Thank you from the “new people” ❤
Welcome to the show!!
I always remember being so excited when this episode was originally released and I've listened to it countless times now. The insightful questions that these guys ask and the depth of response from Quentin is just enthralling as a filmmaker and film geek. An interesting retrospective thing I noticed: when QT is talking about the "misadventure" for Cliff Booth...*spoilers ahead if you haven't read the book, you've been warned*...........................when I first heard this episode, to me, it felt like QT was placing more emphasis on option two which is that it was an accident. That was always the interpretation that I was most convinced of, and it sounded to me like he was most convinced of it too. So it was fascinating to find out in the book that it's actually option one. There's still enough wiggle room for ambiguity though, as Cliff questions "did I really do that on purpose? Was it just a trigger-twitch?" But either way, listening to this podcast now in light of the book is very interesting. It's also fun to think of Brad Pitt having read that chapter before they even started shooting, knowing that dark history for the character, because his performance is so easy and laidback that the darkness only creeps in at the subtlest of times. Great stuff, hope you guys bring QT back for more in-depth conversations!
I'd love to have a conversation with Quentin.
This seems to be the new thing a lot of channels are doing. Re posting old videos without saying they're old videos.
Try reading the description...
@Mal_Freeman0451 Oh you mean the description after you already click on the video like they're trying to get you to do?
Try using common sense.
@@TheJay1979 Why did you click on it if you knew you already saw it? Try using logic..
@Mal_Freeman0451 Because how can you know if it's not a new one, until you click on it? Jesus, are you thick?
Go watch the news then.. with all the depressed shit 🤣
Insinuating Roger Deakins is lazy because he shoots digital is wild…
Niiiiiiiiice! Great way to start a Friday
How funny, the first film I took my teenage daughter to see was "OUATIH''.
Loved it
Please, get these interviews on camera!! Do you realize the value of these interviews in a historical landscape?
Like number 1k right here! Lol
Bring the snark!
oh goddamn it this is old.
still cool but man I WOULD HAVE FREAKED if this is new. damn I was going crazy for a sec lmao
I do agree with the shooting on film in a sense that I do really beleave that more you have to put work into it, better it comes out. There is the process of planning and ideas comes to make it a bit better and actors are even more prepared on point knowing they are otherwise wasting film etc. Like ok you can be a Fincher who tweaks everything to the max even with digital, takes many shots and it looks Great. Still there is so many who basically starts to shoot and are like ok we got the shot we wanted and the time for discovery is lost. There is not that pressure to often make it better from performance standpoint because the actor knows it's not As big deal to go again. That's a lot of the thing by going the harder route. It is like a route for exploring and the feeling of capturing the shot stays in the print.
It is kinda the same as I just many times like some directors indie to mid budgeted movies more than the grandious big budget films. Because in some directors you just see that they really want certain things into the movie, so with the money they have it needs a lot of planning and commitment to get it Right. Like yes with big budget there is similar differend kinda things to go thru, but the missing money kinda often shows a real hunger to do with it something really catching. Kinda this see what I can do with the material even if the budget doesn't let me be overtly flashy with getting this and that equipment. The missing money forces to find a differend more difficult route to the same/similar result you wanted and it just often is better when it is kinda scraped with blood, sweat and tears of how to make it happen 😅 Also some directors just almost seems to forget how important the Mood is for a movie bigger the budget is. It can become just a row of set-pieces that can be very cool, but misses some soul in them.
The point being that the feeling of the intensity of the process of something having been done crawling thru the mud vs an easy mode does in many cases come thru the screen to the watcher.
"Are we getting Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair on Blu ray?" " Ugggh, you have to come to the New Beverly." Nooooooo! Anyways, great interview guys
I will fly to LA just to watch The Whole Bloody Affair on the big screen - come on, let’s go!
@LECITIZENTEN This was 5 years ago lol
What if Tarantinos final movie is an anthology series similar to Pulp Fiction, and its sequences with the Vega Brothers, a showdown between the Bride and Vernita Greens daughter, and any other loose ends. It would be a satisfying coda to the career. Though it certainly won’t happen.
Happy Friday
Furosia bomb
Excellent interview. Congrats!
I believe that Heath ledger and Matt Damon switched roles in Brother's Grimm.
I loved Bruce in Four Rooms!
I miss Quentin. He has been keeping a low profile lately.
War in Israel. He lives there with his wife /
Quentin is saying that he prefers the "lit" look of classic Hollywood, when it was absolutely necessary to use lots of heavy lights just to expose the film. He also likes the process of filming, etc. But when you take the approach that the camera sensor is picking up enough image data to fix it in post you're not getting the full artistry of lighting to the frame on the set for every shot.
still waiting for kill bill the whole bloody affair box set 4K
When I saw the movie, I also asked how would Roman Polanski's life had been different if Sharon had lived.
link to the previous episode with QT?
Easier to just search “Quentin Tarantino ReelBlend”
QT Vol 1: ua-cam.com/video/eQ-EAfDw2uc/v-deo.html&pp=ygUVY2luZW1hYmxlbmQgdGFyYW50aW5v
QT Vol 2: This vid!
QT Vol 3: ua-cam.com/video/SPoguRxwT6A/v-deo.html&pp=ygUVY2luZW1hYmxlbmQgdGFyYW50aW5v
QT Vol 4: ua-cam.com/video/NfFwPkHuhV8/v-deo.html&pp=ygUVY2luZW1hYmxlbmQgdGFyYW50aW5v
Only been abusing all the previous QT interviews (even yesterday 😂)
Thought this was a new interview 😔
Where’s the times stamps for when he talks about brad and Leo
This guy is in love with his own voice. To hell with him and this video.
Wait, so I've already heard this b4. You got me excited thinking this was a brand new Quentin podcast with u guys. Why the re-upload?
This interview hasn’t been uploaded to this channel yet, so taking the opportunity to get some of these older interviews on here for new folks, and people that want to revisit without searching far and wide.
Hopefully, we have him back on soon though!
@ReelBlend oh. My bad. I guess I'm such a huge fan that I've already absorbed it as soon as it was available on ur other platforms back in the day, when it was brand spanking new, and I didn't even remember that it wasn't on this channel yet til now, lol. Luv you guys! ✌🏼💕🎸🎶🎥🎞🍿🎬📽
@@deadANTdeadANT No worries at all and thank you for all the support! Some big stuff coming soon so stay tuned ;)
i wish it was a video interview 🥹
💯
Quentin is lying... he's has/had a # 13 Tattoo in pale blue ink, on his neck near his ear... has he had it removed? Possibly??? ... but FACT in 1998 that neck tattoo was 100% Real!!!
👌
The host talks too much let the guest talk!!
45:59
No way is he doing one more film then quitting he is too young....
He has a whole TV series he’s already written, too. Hoping to see that soon.
Quentin obviously doesn't know a thing about lighting for digital. Deakins doesn't wanna spend time lighting? how ignorant can you be? Film is not more legitimate than digital, get over it.
Pulp Fiction is not a comedy
It’s more of a comedy than a drama though. Truly, it’s got a bit of everything.
Tarantino's films are like flashing strobe lights for an orangutan: eye-catching, effective, compelling....
But there is nothing underneath, actually.
QT doesn't know anything about digital cinematography. Made evident by the bullshit he says every time the topic comes up.
Intrigued to know exactly why you dislike Quentin. Can't be just because he doesn't like filming in digital.
@@Ben_Gunner Hi Ben, I LOVE QT. One of my favourite directors, period. I also love listening to him rant. 100%. I just hate people acting like they have authority on matters where they are extremely ignorant.
I hav a high pitch voic n evi i say y duz quinten talk lik da. Ish wen ur an old dog u r d trik
Man, these dudes are total sycophants.
Everyone is a sycophant at least once a day unless you are in the 1% club and don't need to ask for anything with a please and thank-you
Tbh you talking for 10 minutes setting up the stage for what the interview was about killed listening to the actual interview.
You do realize that there's timestamps in the description, right? I skipped right to it and didn't hear a second of the intro.
My thoughts exactly.
I don't think it did at all
The only part of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood that I hated was the whole "western" scenes . UGH .
Gross
There's no way pulp fiction is a comedy
Sorry, but I liked Forrest better.
I've seriously always hated that movie lol. And it's not out of resentment on behalf of the movies up for the Oscar's that year that were much better. I just legitimately think it's the most overrated, overly sentimental Hollywood drivel to ever win best picture. But it is so on brand and fitting that it won that year over Pulp Fiction, a film that ignored all the conventions of story telling and it ends up losing to a movie that shamelessly embraced it.😂
@@StoneColdSteveAutism95 god honest truth: I watched Pulp Fiction the first week it came out in 1994. the theater was full. by the half way mark half of audience had left. at the end we were only 10 left. almost everybody went out. "boring. too violent. doesn´t make any sense", and so on. --- Forrest Gump, same thing: first week, theater full, nobody left. people were mesmerized by that film........ drivel maybe.... but drivel that works.... - Pulp is an experimental film. that is not oscar material. Forrest is basically a perfect film, a great story well told. Pulp is a flawed series of cool scenes. Boring as a whole piece, but great in certain moments. That is not Oscar material. you have to master the whole piece. ignoring all the conventions in itself does not necessarily make up for good storytelling.
@@of1300 Well thank goodness I don't have to rely on the Oscar's or anyone else to help me decide what qualifies as "good storytelling" lol. I'd much rather watch movies they consider to be "boring" or "too violent" like Leon the Professional or Pulp Fiction any day over something as formulaic and sappy as Forrest Gump.
@@StoneColdSteveAutism95 fair enough. Doesn’t make you any better or smarter not to see the qualities in Forrest, but that’s everybody’s right to choose their tastes in movies. I like Pulp Fiction a lot, by the way. I just don’t consider it Oscar material or perfect. That’s just my opinion, man.
@@of1300 No, I don't think liking or disliking a movie makes anyone smart or dumb at all, that I agree with. My issue with Forrest isn't that I think it's dumb, it's that I think it's typical Oscar bait type material which is my opinion. And I didn't think you disliked Pulp Fiction.