Use code EmilyBaker50 at www.GreenChef.com/EmilyBaker50 to get 50% off, plus 20% off your next two months! Visit thrivecausemetics.com/LAWNERD for 10% off your first order. Go to shopify.com/lawnerd now to grow your business-no matter what stage you’re in.
Hey just wondering, I literally just heard about Project 2025, are you able to talk about it because even just the little i saw was terrifying. but thank you for doing what you do. you are the best!
Agree with you completely it was a power trip rather than a judicial opinion and the lawyers that came in to defend the attorney were very explicit about the impropriety that the hidden meeting implied
Like several of us here, I have ADHD and Dyslexia. I haven't been on here regularly for two or three months. Life. Thank you, Emily, and the Law Nerds for always welcoming us, explaining things easier for my mind to understand.
One thing I really respect about the Idaho judge is that he was willing to change his opinion on cameras in the courtroom. For the Lori Daybell trial he said “no cameras” because he felt it contributed to publicity, salaciousness, etc. But a woman who has been advocating for cameras in federal courts explained the value of cameras when it comes comes to the education of the public and their trust in the judicial system. He said he found what she said interesting and would consider it. He later decided for it and the next trial (Chad Daybell) was televised.
Lifetime appointments are bad for several reasons, and this is one of 'em. Judges who feel invincible are more likely to judge unfairly or behave inappropriately. Lifetime appointments and qualified immunity both need, at a bare minimum, heavy scrutiny.
Reminds me of the end of the movie Buffy the vampire Slayer where the principal was given detentions to all the bodies laying on the floor. Detention, detention, detention...
The Young Thug case is rolling itself into a mistrial, at minimum, real quick. Glanville is out, and so is the replacement judge due to that judge's deputy having an inappropriate relationship with a defendant.
@leylahoatman1897 I don't think that affects the length of time of the trial rather the quickness in which it's started. I think you'd have to wave if you wanted to take time gathering evidence, witnesses, coming up with strategy, etc. If the DA wanted to do those things they would need you to wave. But, some cases are just going to be lengthy due to the number of charges, amount of evidence, number of defendants, etc. So I don't think that's what it's about.
@@leylahoatman1897speedy trial is supposed to prevent someone sitting in prison for years before their trial starts. as far as i know the amendment doesn’t prevent someone’s trial taking years to be completed.
I have to say I'm newer law nerd here. While waiting for Emily I tuned into some other law commentaries about this case - they made no sense to me!! So thanks Emily!! Now on to the witchcraft trial!!! 🧹🧹🧹
Contempt warnings remind me of end of Buffy vampire Slayer movie where principal was giving detentions to all bodies laying on the floor. Detention, detention, detention...
The state got greedy. They could have gone after one or some of the defendants for the actual crime of murder. They want that $$$$ though so they went for RICO. I think they bit off more they can chew because Miss. Fani wants to make a name for herself but isn't the more qualified and ethical DA out there.
10:00 - He was only granted immunity from state charges though, as the state cannot grant immunity from federal charges. If you carefully parse what Copeland said, one could argue that he did indeed answer the questions that he was granted immunity for. But when the state questioned him about his age (which would honestly be irrelevant to his testimony), he pleads the fifth. Why would he do that? Assume arguendo, that he did falsify his date of birth in a federal record, which the Feds could charge him for. Now if you think about each and every time he pleaded the fifth you can find an argument as to why he did not answer.
Fortunately Ingram (newest old judge) had just been randomly assigned the case and had a conflict of interest due to being a judge on a case for a witness in this trial. Nothing nefarious 😅😅
hey Emily, would it be possible to leave those, BTS Podcasts for Members, up for maybe a day or 12h? i live in europe and, you know, Timezones ha. theres just no way i can join if its deep into the night here. would be amazing if theres a possibility
Fortunately Ingram (newest old judge) had just been randomly assigned the case and had a conflict of interest due to being a judge on a case for a witness in this trial. Nothing nefarious this time 😅😅
I’m so stuck in the immunity. He could still be prosecuted by the Feds and the state can’t tell him that they couldn’t and shouldn’t have told him that in the meeting. Only the Feds could do that. Am I wrong?
**off topic, but I'm watching a Netflix called Homicide Los Angeles, and Alan Jackson is in it! All thx to EDB that I even know who this man is! It was his voice that first got me. I looked away to do something, heard this voice and thought "I recognize that voice from Emily's channel! 😊 I did just learn that he won against Phil Spector! Oh the things I am learning from the best channel on UA-cam. And no one has a chat group like the law nerds! All, just the best ❤
It’s wild how many people just watch clips of certain things and assume they know what’s happening… I saw a clip of Alec Baldwin walking out of court and at least half of the comments were saying “it’s not a big deal, he technically doesn’t even have to be present, his lawyers are there, stop overreacting, no one would say anything if he weren’t a celebrity, etc…” None of these people watched the whole thing clearly, especially the part where he was literally ordered to be present and brought in specifically for that particular evidentiary hearing 15 minutes prior.. lol
Because the witness was granted immunity. The 5th Amendment protects your right against incriminating yourself. If a witness has immunity, that witness' testimony cannot incriminate them, and therefore the 5th amendment no longer applies. At least, that is the reasoning, and its application to this case and a particular witness is certainly debatable.
I think the problem is they gave him immunity so he's forced to testify and can't use the 5th amendment. They pretty much trapped him even tho he was saying the entire time he wanted to use the 5th
Yes, they weaponized the immunity that he didn’t ask for. Ethically deplorable because you aren’t allowed to put a witness on the stand that will plead the 5th
I can't tell you how much I agree with you about eyes on the court. If they aren't broadcast, they need to be recorded for the public to view. Too much fu@&ery goes on and people need to see what's going on. Thx for all you and the Law Nerds do!! XXOO ❤️ ❤️
Watching both you and Peter Tragos and his father discuss these issues about potential mistrial on YSL trial, either you or Peter said on one of your commentaries this is the issue about trying all these defendants in one case, so while they were trying to save money on 6 seperate trials may come back to bite them now. Or whatever the reasons
Judge Glanville was like “Go. To. Time. Out. Anyone else want to go to time out? Because I will send you to time out!” Well the legal adult equivalent of time out…
I feel like you mentioned one time in the herd trial or whatever where to find the glasses that you wear. I think maybe it was linked in a description or something. Would you be able to post that again
Replay:. Definition for shall: (in laws, directives, etc.) must; is or are obliged to:. The meetings of the council shall be public. For giggle & grins
Are we sure that someone didn’t swap the judge for Oprah? - ‘You get held in contempt, ou get held in contempt, ou get held in contempt , everyone is getting held in contempt!’
New judge already removed herself for conflict of interest, don’t think anyone wants to touch this case with a 10ft stick. All these judges are below Glanville anyway so they are in a bad position.
Do we agree with the judge's statements of facts in this order? Her finding that the ex-parte meeting was essentially ok because no one gained an advantage feels like BS. In the transcript it feels like the witness is being bullied, the witness stated he had never told the truth in his life, and the witness said he would cop to a murder that the prosecution threatened to prosecute him for perjury for. These all seem like improper conversations.
It’s the right call but I felt the judge protected the judge and prosecutors how she wrote it. How is the poor judge suppose to catch up with 6 months of trial?
Use code EmilyBaker50 at www.GreenChef.com/EmilyBaker50 to get 50% off, plus 20% off your next two months!
Visit thrivecausemetics.com/LAWNERD for 10% off your first order.
Go to shopify.com/lawnerd now to grow your business-no matter what stage you’re in.
Why isn't UA-cam showing me as a member???
Hey just wondering, I literally just heard about Project 2025, are you able to talk about it because even just the little i saw was terrifying. but thank you for doing what you do. you are the best!
I've been so obsessed with this Judge's drama, I don't even remember what the trial is about.
This judge’s behavior is BONKERS!!! 😮
They don’t either!
How can ANYONE when it takes a yr to find a jury
Which is not only understandable but, also wild af since it’s a HUGE RICO case!
@@marilyngardner2332the prosecution believes young thug’s music label is actually a violent gang with members that have killed rival gang members.
IMO The way that judge treated that attorney was awful....and down right disgusting!!
Agree with you completely it was a power trip rather than a judicial opinion and the lawyers that came in to defend the attorney were very explicit about the impropriety that the hidden meeting implied
Merch idea: dictionary definition of "shall" - "means must fucking do it" example: "you shall yeet thyself" 🤣
Like several of us here, I have ADHD and Dyslexia. I haven't been on here regularly for two or three months. Life.
Thank you, Emily, and the Law Nerds for always welcoming us, explaining things easier for my mind to understand.
Finally ! Ive been waiting for you to catch up on this one ! This trial is wild. Craziest shitshow there is.
And with all of the shit shows going on at the moment - that's really saying something...
One thing I really respect about the Idaho judge is that he was willing to change his opinion on cameras in the courtroom.
For the Lori Daybell trial he said “no cameras” because he felt it contributed to publicity, salaciousness, etc. But a woman who has been advocating for cameras in federal courts explained the value of cameras when it comes comes to the education of the public and their trust in the judicial system.
He said he found what she said interesting and would consider it. He later decided for it and the next trial (Chad Daybell) was televised.
I’m stunned it took so long to remove this judge! His abuse of power is outrageous, like he doesn’t know cameras are a thing.
Must be something in the air for Atlanta suburb judges. Just look up Christina Peterson if you're unfamiliar
@@SirFigsAlot is that the texting judge with the pink chair she forced ppl to take photos in?
The NEW judge was just recused TOO! THIS MORNING? what is going onnnnnnn
And now the third judge selected had a fundraiser hosted by 3 of the defense lawyers
You have to be lying. What the hell is going on???
@@GuyvermectinWait. Seriously?!?
This judge sounds like he's lost the plot 😳. How many people are sitting in seats of power that should be retired like everyone else? 😮
SERIOUSLY!!!
Lifetime appointments are bad for several reasons, and this is one of 'em. Judges who feel invincible are more likely to judge unfairly or behave inappropriately. Lifetime appointments and qualified immunity both need, at a bare minimum, heavy scrutiny.
You get contempt...you get contempt...Everybody gets contempt!
Reminds me of the end of the movie Buffy the vampire Slayer where the principal was given detentions to all the bodies laying on the floor. Detention, detention, detention...
The Young Thug case is rolling itself into a mistrial, at minimum, real quick. Glanville is out, and so is the replacement judge due to that judge's deputy having an inappropriate relationship with a defendant.
I wonder if young thug waved his right to a quick and speedy trial
@leylahoatman1897 I don't think that affects the length of time of the trial rather the quickness in which it's started. I think you'd have to wave if you wanted to take time gathering evidence, witnesses, coming up with strategy, etc. If the DA wanted to do those things they would need you to wave. But, some cases are just going to be lengthy due to the number of charges, amount of evidence, number of defendants, etc. So I don't think that's what it's about.
@@michelledaniels9887 ohh that makes sense!
Wait, what? OMG... what next? 😂
@@leylahoatman1897speedy trial is supposed to prevent someone sitting in prison for years before their trial starts. as far as i know the amendment doesn’t prevent someone’s trial taking years to be completed.
Hey from England UK law nerds x
Because that judge works under Judge G! Of course she’s not going to say anything bad about him.
Wow! 785k subs! That's so awesome! Lets go Emily!
I have to say I'm newer law nerd here. While waiting for Emily I tuned into some other law commentaries about this case - they made no sense to me!! So thanks Emily!! Now on to the witchcraft trial!!! 🧹🧹🧹
What trial is THIS!!!!!
Contempt warnings remind me of end of Buffy vampire Slayer movie where principal was giving detentions to all bodies laying on the floor. Detention, detention, detention...
😂
Uncle Runkle is streaming the new Bowles filing in the Gutierrez trial
I'm late...but Hannah's attorney did make the filing for dismisal /retrial
Did you see that the replacement judge yeeted themselves already?
⁉️ Emily, how can the jury still be hanging in there after all this time? Why are they not dropping off like they have other things to do?⁉️
This whole trial is a mess but excited for the trial coverage
Hello and blessings to everyone. Thank you, Emily, and all of the mods 💜 Hugs to Fred and George 💜
What does this really mean to the case? Will this case start over? My brain is fried. LOL
I have a feeling ultimately it will become a mistrial.
I am concerned that there will be no justice for the victims and their families. This is awful.
The state got greedy. They could have gone after one or some of the defendants for the actual crime of murder. They want that $$$$ though so they went for RICO. I think they bit off more they can chew because Miss. Fani wants to make a name for herself but isn't the more qualified and ethical DA out there.
App notified me only 12 minutes late. That's the record
Well, NOTHING notified me about this! Not UA-cam, not Messages, not the app--which has decided I'm not a member and won't even let me in.
Same same
I got an app notification right when you posted this
I haven't been following this trial at all, but the YT 'recommended' thumbnails are wild LOL 😜
I know nothing about this case or the trial. I’d like to catch up but my energy has been drained by my own legal drama. Yuk.
Here for it all 🎉 law is super facinating with the law nerds and you EDB, thanks for being fabulous!
10:00 - He was only granted immunity from state charges though, as the state cannot grant immunity from federal charges. If you carefully parse what Copeland said, one could argue that he did indeed answer the questions that he was granted immunity for. But when the state questioned him about his age (which would honestly be irrelevant to his testimony), he pleads the fifth. Why would he do that? Assume arguendo, that he did falsify his date of birth in a federal record, which the Feds could charge him for. Now if you think about each and every time he pleaded the fifth you can find an argument as to why he did not answer.
New judge just recused herself
Fortunately Ingram (newest old judge) had just been randomly assigned the case and had a conflict of interest due to being a judge on a case for a witness in this trial. Nothing nefarious 😅😅
No notification anywhere! And the app thinks I cancelled my membership despite my continued $. 😡
hey Emily, would it be possible to leave those, BTS Podcasts for Members, up for maybe a day or 12h?
i live in europe and, you know, Timezones ha. theres just no way i can join if its deep into the night here. would be amazing if theres a possibility
They just dismissed the new judge today as well!!
Fortunately Ingram (newest old judge) had just been randomly assigned the case and had a conflict of interest due to being a judge on a case for a witness in this trial. Nothing nefarious this time 😅😅
@@cailinanne yea. And as I keep hearing more about her, she probably would’ve been a good judge for this case.
@@Southpawdg1 right? Such a bummer.
I’m so stuck in the immunity. He could still be prosecuted by the Feds and the state can’t tell him that they couldn’t and shouldn’t have told him that in the meeting. Only the Feds could do that. Am I wrong?
Oh my word the new judge also recused herself, Karen Read judge also seems to have recused herself...bad day (good day for justice) for judges 😂
Been waiting for your take on this ..🎉🎉🎉👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Good morning, fellow law nerds
Do a kick flip! 😂
Dude I finally watched the depp heard Netflix doc and holy shit you are in it dude!!! That’s so damn cool you are truly the shit
Even my coworkers asked what case I’m watching. lol
I'm lost I don't know anything about this trial. I need to go back and watch an earlier video perhaps lol
Me too..I’m interested now
👍💜👍 not so drawn to this case, but spending time w/you & the law nerds makes it necessary to listen 😊
**off topic, but I'm watching a Netflix called Homicide Los Angeles, and Alan Jackson is in it! All thx to EDB that I even know who this man is! It was his voice that first got me. I looked away to do something, heard this voice and thought "I recognize that voice from Emily's channel! 😊 I did just learn that he won against Phil Spector! Oh the things I am learning from the best channel on UA-cam. And no one has a chat group like the law nerds! All, just the best ❤
You make me smile every day! So glad to see a SMART STRONG INTELLIGENT WOMAN!!! YOU GO girl!!!!
Great catch up on things! Thank you
Do you know how much you are loved Emily!!? 😂😂 Seriously!!❤❤❤❤ Thank You for being You!!🥰🥰
Good morning! ☕️
It’s wild how many people just watch clips of certain things and assume they know what’s happening… I saw a clip of Alec Baldwin walking out of court and at least half of the comments were saying “it’s not a big deal, he technically doesn’t even have to be present, his lawyers are there, stop overreacting, no one would say anything if he weren’t a celebrity, etc…” None of these people watched the whole thing clearly, especially the part where he was literally ordered to be present and brought in specifically for that particular evidentiary hearing 15 minutes prior.. lol
Wouldn't the possibility of federal charges be enough to assert your 5th amendment right in a state prosecution?
If the 5th amendment is a right, why can you be jailed for exercising that right? So confused
Because the witness was granted immunity. The 5th Amendment protects your right against incriminating yourself. If a witness has immunity, that witness' testimony cannot incriminate them, and therefore the 5th amendment no longer applies. At least, that is the reasoning, and its application to this case and a particular witness is certainly debatable.
I think the problem is they gave him immunity so he's forced to testify and can't use the 5th amendment. They pretty much trapped him even tho he was saying the entire time he wanted to use the 5th
Yes, they weaponized the immunity that he didn’t ask for. Ethically deplorable because you aren’t allowed to put a witness on the stand that will plead the 5th
@@MH-nq6wnthe problem here is they didn't give federal immunity so he could still incriminate himself.
@@MisAdventurousBookMousethere are so many constitutional loopholes we really need to close…
Judge Glanville = Old Thug, that's how he ran this trial
Lord help me. My husband is wandering around the house, making comments about anything & everything, and I’m trying to hear EDB!!!!!!!!! 🤯
We are retired. My husband does that all the time and then I have to tell him he has to be quiet because I’m in trial.
I suffer the same.
Sometimes I wish they came with remotes so we could mute. Fast forward would be helpful too when they start talking nonsense.
@@sherrymartin3834 me too “can’t talk now love, in court”
@@michelledaniels9887😂
So glad you're on 😀
Good morning, Emily! ☀️
Could it be deemed as not fair to the defendants to have the trial continue with the new judge?
Love our community! 🙏💜
I can't tell you how much I agree with you about eyes on the court. If they aren't broadcast, they need to be recorded for the public to view. Too much fu@&ery goes on and people need to see what's going on. Thx for all you and the Law Nerds do!! XXOO ❤️ ❤️
We need the Oprah “you get a” meme only with contempt. 43:54
7:52 My FACTS hat came this morning and I love it!! 💜💜💜
I wish our courts would live stream!
Watching both you and Peter Tragos and his father discuss these issues about potential mistrial on YSL trial, either you or Peter said on one of your commentaries this is the issue about trying all these defendants in one case, so while they were trying to save money on 6 seperate trials may come back to bite them now. Or whatever the reasons
Yea I was watching already when the notification came thru
33:12 🎶 Oooo you and me we’ve got big Reputation! 🎶
Judge Glanville was like “Go. To. Time. Out. Anyone else want to go to time out? Because I will send you to time out!” Well the legal adult equivalent of time out…
Love the look of whatever you call that... a banner maybe
❓❓❓ Why didn’t Judge Bev refer the motion to recuse for KR trial?
I feel like you mentioned one time in the herd trial or whatever where to find the glasses that you wear. I think maybe it was linked in a description or something. Would you be able to post that again
They are Irlen lenses. You can Google suppliers and testers near you. Hope that helps.
Thank you ❤ 😊
Emily, this trial is turning into a "Thug" "hood" court case. Everybody is held in contempt. lol
Love the new glasses but they need the anti reflection coating
Replay:. Definition for shall: (in laws, directives, etc.) must; is or are obliged to:. The meetings of the council shall be public. For giggle & grins
Sorry, I just got notified. Hello, my Law and Paw Nerds.
I have a membership! Dammit.
Good morning
Thanks!
Part of the replay crew!!! 🙃🙃🙃
The new judge is out too.
Hi everyone
?judge cannone argued her own requsal , could KR defense have pushed or appealed her requsal denial?
Mr Steel's all "thanks for greatly increasing the hourly rate I can charge."
Morning Law Nerds
22:07 it’s Moo!!!
@EmilyDBaker my brother is still one of the Attorneys on this case. Something tells me he did not sign up for this kind of duration. ⚖️🍒
Hello law nerds 💜
Are we sure that someone didn’t swap the judge for Oprah? - ‘You get held in contempt, ou get held in contempt, ou get held in contempt , everyone is getting held in contempt!’
New judge already removed herself for conflict of interest, don’t think anyone wants to touch this case with a 10ft stick. All these judges are below Glanville anyway so they are in a bad position.
the new Judge got removed now
Morning all from California
Should’ve ruled that there was a Brady violation
I get cramps that wake me up in the middle of the night. I’d rather an alarm dream.
I don't recall Glanville threatening Merchant with contempt...
Do we agree with the judge's statements of facts in this order? Her finding that the ex-parte meeting was essentially ok because no one gained an advantage feels like BS. In the transcript it feels like the witness is being bullied, the witness stated he had never told the truth in his life, and the witness said he would cop to a murder that the prosecution threatened to prosecute him for perjury for. These all seem like improper conversations.
I wish i was a member ❤
Attention! New judge has also just recused!
Yep… I had a funny feeling about her already.
It’s the right call but I felt the judge protected the judge and prosecutors how she wrote it. How is the poor judge suppose to catch up with 6 months of trial?
Hotlanta=Hotmess
Fulton county🙄
@emily are you going to cover the black swan case? I think it starts next week
I'm here before my notification.
Just so you know I got my notification 14 minutes late
Mine was 16 minutes late