Lorier is a brand i intend to be a milestone choice in a few years, the Hyperion on top, although their small selection is remarkably versatile. True homaging with their own language - a very difficult balance to get - with solid specifications. I'm not a huge fan of acrylic but i have it in some of my vintages which i love, so this isn't a real problem for me. My only complain is that i wish the bezel there was 60 or 120 clicks, so as to get more usefulness other than tracking a timezone.
I’ve got 2 Lorier watches, a Neptune diver I bought a few years ago. The other the Gemini Racer with yellow dial which I am actually wearing now!👍🏼😎 Fantastic watches, very well made & a bit different from the norm. Enjoy Steve!
We must have similar tastes Andrew. I have a Series 3 Neptune and also a Gemini Nero. Definitely a Lorier fan, and I think a Hyperion will be the next one in the collection, but I’m thinking the Skyward as I have too many black dial watches already.
That’s a stunner. I think it’s worth every dollar. I prefer acrylic over mineral crystal (like you sapphire is 1st of course). At least you can buff it out pretty easily. Thanks for the great review!
Good review of a great looking watch 👍. I agree about the movement, the lack of quickset isn't a problem for frequent fliers with just one watch, but for watch collectors the caller GMT is better. An acryllic crystal in good condition used to be my favourite, so clear and no need for AR, but I just got a Baltany 1921 and the sapphire on that is superb and the clear AR doesn't notice at all.
Nice review. I do love mine. I will note that the acrylic fane will scratch easily-- I made the mistake of traveling with mine in a laptop bag, and got a lot of small scratches that dim the look at the beautiful dark enamel look and hands. I have the poly watch, now just have to use it!
This is how you do a vintage inspired watch, definitely going to try and get one next drop. Love the size and style, and it looks well worth the money. I don't think I caught this from your review though, 100m WR?
A great in depth review. I nearly pulled the trigger when these came out but 37.4mm is just too small for me. It's not really my wrist size (same as yours at 7.5") but it's more my eyes which struggle to read stuff. It's just a bit small for my eyes to appreciate. But yes a beautifully well executed piece and I love the use of acrylic for the bezel and the glass. The lume treatment is well thought out, but would be better if the bezel lume was stronger.
It's a good looking watch. I got one in the last re-stock. Great value for the price with the 9075 movement. Be advised that this watch wears small. I have a 7 1/2" wrist and on the supplied very thin metal bracelet, while comfortable, it looked tiny on my wrist. Tried it on a leather strap but that didn't help either. Wearing it now on a jubilee-style bracelet and this seems to "beef" it up a bit.
I would really like lorier to bring back the stainless steel handset as an option. The gold gilt is the only thing stopping me. I had the previous gen silver hands and sold it to get the new…whoops
Love it Nuff said Thanks for sharing another great review my friend Hope that you had an outstanding Christmas as well looking forward to more of your epic content Be well and Keep em coming 👍
Thanks for the review Steve. I have a Series 3 Neptune and also a Gemini Nero chronograph. I’m considering the Skyward when it’s next released but also tempted by the upgraded Phoibos Wavemaster GMT coming in April. If you could have your money back and you’re choosing between these again, which would you go for?
I wouldn't say one is built better than the other so it comes down to personal preference. For the visuals alone id go with this one. But I still have my orange wave master GMT V1 and it's a great watch in its own right. But it just lacks that character that the Lorier just oozes
@@EscapeWheel I know what you mean, there’s just something about Lorier, I find all of their watches are designed really well and have a classy look and feel to them..I have 2 others as mentioned, plus Lauren and Lorenzo are just super nice people, and Lauren responds to emails really quickly. Even being over here in the UK, I feel like it’s a personal service and connection between me and the two of them. And you don’t get that with any of the AliExpress brands and many other micro or small watch brands.
I guess im slightly disappointed to hear the finishing is on par with san martin, whose gmts are less than half the price. I understand the movement is less refined and a lower beat rate, but still disappointing imo. Same with the acrylic... kind of a deal breaker for me personally. I hate scratched crystals, and i beat my watches. This is just my opinion but a gorgeous piece nonetheless
Don't get too excited by this one. They only sell a couple at a time. I have wanted one for quite a while, but continue to be disappointed by their business practice (not producing enough for customer demand). Would it really hurt to produce a few extra, so you can have them in-stock for more than a couple minutes?
I remember I bought the 1st drop with the new movement. And got a better ROI than a Rolex Pepsi. I flipped it to some psycho Aussie on C24 for $1700 and that doesn't even account for customs he probably had to pay. So maybe he was all in over $2k😂😂😂😂 I got every drop and they sell double retail easily.
Don't get the true gmt vs office gmt. Seems like a pain in the ass, and I appreciate Americans have a couple of timezones these things are ment for gallivanting World travellers. And considering about 10% of Americans hold a passport, I would be much happier with a swift date change. Sorry man I just don't get the travellers v office argument. I have found office much more useful. Nice watch though and good review.
I've had both and I'm 100% in the caller GMT camp. The whole traveller GMT thing has been a bit of a fad, egged on by successful noobies like Teddy Baldassssarrrre using the false term "true GMT" (implying that if it's not a "true GMT" then it's somehow false or broken... and no Teddy it's not) and the fact that Rolex uses traveller GMT and probably throws shade on caller GMT.
I know acrylic looks good but scratches tok easy i know it can buff out but id be too scared to scratch it I'd rather a sapphire crystal that's why I'd never
I am in Canada- maybe the website automatically changed the currency for me. It did not indicate what currency it was. Better, but still not a bargain.@@EscapeWheel
It may be. I got to their website from Canada, and although the website didn't specify, maybe it was in Canadian dollars. In any case, $US599 is still too much; there are lots of watches that capture the vintage feel while using superior modern materials.@@peakrider4886
$600 for a miyota, acrylic, 100m no name brand watch with sub par finishing and no history or legacy? Case in point, I bought my Omega Seamaster professional 300m automatic for $1400 years ago. Save a bit more and get something like an oris or a decent Seiko diver. Heck, I recently picked up my Hamilton Murph 38mm for $500 and my 43mm bulova lunar pilot snoopy colorway for only $300. Way better choices with actual history out there. But each to their own.
Stop looking at brand name man! Show me a true GMT watch with awesome wearing dimensions, finishing to this standard for this price point. You’re truly missing out, but to each their own.
@@dannyle_chu like I said I’d rather a gmt Seiko or bulova. Price point is similar. Let’s be real, these are “jewelry” pieces and brand prestige and history behind it matters. G-shock as before mentioned will do the “watch” department much better at a fraction of the cost. Also these no name brands imitated the designs of big name Swiss brands so the heavy lifting has already been done in that department. If I wanted a decent knockoff or homage these days, those Chinese no name can do it cheaper and better. No need for something pretentious in my opinion as these micro brands for what I consider to be over priced. If they designed something that is uniquely their own, I’d respect that. For now, just get Oris, Seiko, Hamilton, Bulova in that similar entry level price point or slightly above.
@@dennischen8887 to each their own because I could not care less about brand prestige and history, I’m beyond that. God forbid if you find out these big Swiss brands also imitate others too?! If you think this is overpriced, I guess there’s nothing else to be said LOL. Like I said, find me a flyer’s GMT that beats this price point and then we’ll talk
Lorier is a brand i intend to be a milestone choice in a few years, the Hyperion on top, although their small selection is remarkably versatile. True homaging with their own language - a very difficult balance to get - with solid specifications. I'm not a huge fan of acrylic but i have it in some of my vintages which i love, so this isn't a real problem for me.
My only complain is that i wish the bezel there was 60 or 120 clicks, so as to get more usefulness other than tracking a timezone.
I’ve got 2 Lorier watches, a Neptune diver I bought a few years ago. The other the Gemini Racer with yellow dial which I am actually wearing now!👍🏼😎 Fantastic watches, very well made & a bit different from the norm. Enjoy Steve!
You can really make a full collection with their lineup. Very tempted by the Neptune...very
We must have similar tastes Andrew. I have a Series 3 Neptune and also a Gemini Nero. Definitely a Lorier fan, and I think a Hyperion will be the next one in the collection, but I’m thinking the Skyward as I have too many black dial watches already.
That’s a stunner. I think it’s worth every dollar. I prefer acrylic over mineral crystal (like you sapphire is 1st of course). At least you can buff it out pretty easily. Thanks for the great review!
Yup, I need to buff mine out soon. Glad they threw a cloth and polywatch in the box 👍
The good thing for them is their merchandise never "sleeps" long. From the factory to the end buyer trip.
Solid review. I've come close to buying a Neptune in the past but never pulled the trigger.
Good review of a great looking watch 👍. I agree about the movement, the lack of quickset isn't a problem for frequent fliers with just one watch, but for watch collectors the caller GMT is better. An acryllic crystal in good condition used to be my favourite, so clear and no need for AR, but I just got a Baltany 1921 and the sapphire on that is superb and the clear AR doesn't notice at all.
Nice review. I do love mine. I will note that the acrylic fane will scratch easily-- I made the mistake of traveling with mine in a laptop bag, and got a lot of small scratches that dim the look at the beautiful dark enamel look and hands. I have the poly watch, now just have to use it!
Not annoying just very useful when traveling or when crossing multiple time zones on ocean passages.
This is how you do a vintage inspired watch, definitely going to try and get one next drop. Love the size and style, and it looks well worth the money. I don't think I caught this from your review though, 100m WR?
Yes, 100m.👍
A great in depth review. I nearly pulled the trigger when these came out but 37.4mm is just too small for me. It's not really my wrist size (same as yours at 7.5") but it's more my eyes which struggle to read stuff. It's just a bit small for my eyes to appreciate. But yes a beautifully well executed piece and I love the use of acrylic for the bezel and the glass. The lume treatment is well thought out, but would be better if the bezel lume was stronger.
Thanks for the review, was looking into buying this watch.
Just wondering if you could mention other similar style watch in similar budget
It's a good looking watch. I got one in the last re-stock. Great value for the price with the 9075 movement. Be advised that this watch wears small. I have a 7 1/2" wrist and on the supplied very thin metal bracelet, while comfortable, it looked tiny on my wrist. Tried it on a leather strap but that didn't help either. Wearing it now on a jubilee-style bracelet and this seems to "beef" it up a bit.
Did you find a nice fitting jubilee or is it straight end?
@@EscapeWheel Its a straight end one I got from Amazon. I don't think it looks bad given the vintage feel of the watch.
I would really like lorier to bring back the stainless steel handset as an option. The gold gilt is the only thing stopping me. I had the previous gen silver hands and sold it to get the new…whoops
Thanks for the video. VERY NICE!!! I am still in the hunt for a Lorier. Cheers!!!
I wish you luck 👍
Love it Nuff said Thanks for sharing another great review my friend Hope that you had an outstanding Christmas as well looking forward to more of your epic content Be well and Keep em coming 👍
"Every time i put it on, i love it" (this sould be the thumbnail Steve, as it's the whole meaning of this review)
Thanks for the review Steve. I have a Series 3 Neptune and also a Gemini Nero chronograph. I’m considering the Skyward when it’s next released but also tempted by the upgraded Phoibos Wavemaster GMT coming in April. If you could have your money back and you’re choosing between these again, which would you go for?
I wouldn't say one is built better than the other so it comes down to personal preference. For the visuals alone id go with this one. But I still have my orange wave master GMT V1 and it's a great watch in its own right. But it just lacks that character that the Lorier just oozes
@@EscapeWheel I know what you mean, there’s just something about Lorier, I find all of their watches are designed really well and have a classy look and feel to them..I have 2 others as mentioned, plus Lauren and Lorenzo are just super nice people, and Lauren responds to emails really quickly. Even being over here in the UK, I feel like it’s a personal service and connection between me and the two of them. And you don’t get that with any of the AliExpress brands and many other micro or small watch brands.
Have the Neptune myself, beautiful watches
It may be next on my list
This is such an appealing watch. Just confused between this and the CW dune
@@VivekSingh-hy1dk Ive had my finger on the Dune many times.
@@EscapeWheel so, Which one do you recommend?
Because of the issue with the date on a "true GMT ". I think that I like the "caller's GMT" better. Just my personal opinion.
I guess im slightly disappointed to hear the finishing is on par with san martin, whose gmts are less than half the price.
I understand the movement is less refined and a lower beat rate, but still disappointing imo.
Same with the acrylic... kind of a deal breaker for me personally.
I hate scratched crystals, and i beat my watches. This is just my opinion but a gorgeous piece nonetheless
Don't get too excited by this one. They only sell a couple at a time. I have wanted one for quite a while, but continue to be disappointed by their business practice (not producing enough for customer demand). Would it really hurt to produce a few extra, so you can have them in-stock for more than a couple minutes?
How long have you been waiting? Have they had more than one release of this current model with the 9075?
I remember I bought the 1st drop with the new movement. And got a better ROI than a Rolex Pepsi.
I flipped it to some psycho Aussie on C24 for $1700 and that doesn't even account for customs he probably had to pay. So maybe he was all in over $2k😂😂😂😂
I got every drop and they sell double retail easily.
Lorier looks great, THEN you pull out your wrist and that Damasko! 😊
Haha, I really spoiled myself this year. 🤭. But thank you. The collection is really starting to take form.
Don't get the true gmt vs office gmt. Seems like a pain in the ass, and I appreciate Americans have a couple of timezones these things are ment for gallivanting World travellers. And considering about 10% of Americans hold a passport, I would be much happier with a swift date change.
Sorry man I just don't get the travellers v office argument. I have found office much more useful.
Nice watch though and good review.
Same here. I'd rather save $75 or so and get an NH34. But people wanted that travellers GMT. It's just a bit inconvenient to me 🤷
The NH34 would be a poor performer in comparison to the Miyota.
I've had both and I'm 100% in the caller GMT camp. The whole traveller GMT thing has been a bit of a fad, egged on by successful noobies like Teddy Baldassssarrrre using the false term "true GMT" (implying that if it's not a "true GMT" then it's somehow false or broken... and no Teddy it's not) and the fact that Rolex uses traveller GMT and probably throws shade on caller GMT.
I know acrylic looks good but scratches tok easy i know it can buff out but id be too scared to scratch it I'd rather a sapphire crystal that's why I'd never
That green lume on the bezel is awful. Looks good otherwise
I like to see Lorier and Baltic watches. Lorier will probably not be bought because the price will go over the roof to get it in EU.
Nice watch, but the price is now $822, far too much for a watch with a plastic crystal and bezel ring.
Still showing as $599USD for me 🤷
I am in Canada- maybe the website automatically changed the currency for me. It did not indicate what currency it was. Better, but still not a bargain.@@EscapeWheel
Agree, still priced at $599 USD. Are you looking at a different currency?
It may be. I got to their website from Canada, and although the website didn't specify, maybe it was in Canadian dollars. In any case, $US599 is still too much; there are lots of watches that capture the vintage feel while using superior modern materials.@@peakrider4886
$600 for a miyota, acrylic, 100m no name brand watch with sub par finishing and no history or legacy? Case in point, I bought my Omega Seamaster professional 300m automatic for $1400 years ago. Save a bit more and get something like an oris or a decent Seiko diver. Heck, I recently picked up my Hamilton Murph 38mm for $500 and my 43mm bulova lunar pilot snoopy colorway for only $300. Way better choices with actual history out there. But each to their own.
Stop looking at brand name man! Show me a true GMT watch with awesome wearing dimensions, finishing to this standard for this price point. You’re truly missing out, but to each their own.
Also I should mention that my G Shock just poops all over your collection for $49, in case you wanted to die on the specs hill
@@dannyle_chu like I said I’d rather a gmt Seiko or bulova. Price point is similar. Let’s be real, these are “jewelry” pieces and brand prestige and history behind it matters. G-shock as before mentioned will do the “watch” department much better at a fraction of the cost. Also these no name brands imitated the designs of big name Swiss brands so the heavy lifting has already been done in that department. If I wanted a decent knockoff or homage these days, those Chinese no name can do it cheaper and better. No need for something pretentious in my opinion as these micro brands for what I consider to be over priced. If they designed something that is uniquely their own, I’d respect that. For now, just get Oris, Seiko, Hamilton, Bulova in that similar entry level price point or slightly above.
@@dannyle_chu I’m not denying that, I literally also posted my own $50 G-shock square as the perfect watch in another video.
@@dennischen8887 to each their own because I could not care less about brand prestige and history, I’m beyond that. God forbid if you find out these big Swiss brands also imitate others too?! If you think this is overpriced, I guess there’s nothing else to be said LOL. Like I said, find me a flyer’s GMT that beats this price point and then we’ll talk
No sapphire no beuno
Yet another wanna be rolex. No creativity at all
Not. Worth. It.