Andrew Huberman Breaks his Silence
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
- For more than a month Andrew Huberman has remained silent on the article by Kerry Howley in New York Magazine about his multiple affairs and poor science. Over that time his podcast has sunk in the rankings and several articles have come out without comment. Instead Huberman hired a PR firm called Scale Strategies to manage his public appearance. However, this week he appeared on the @JockoPodcastOfficial and spent thirteen minutes going into details. This is my reaction video to that commentary.
#hubermanlab #reaction #neuroscience
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @sgcarney
Get Exclusive Updates on Patreon:
/ sgcarney
Substack
sgcarney.substack.com/
Scott Carney Investigates Podcast
www.scottcarney.com/podcast
UA-cam / @sgcarney
Books:
The Wedge
www.scottcarney.com/the-wedge
What Doesn't Kill Us
www.scottcarney.com/what-does...
The Enlightenment Trap
www.scottcarney.com/the-enlig...
The Vortex
www.scottcarney.com/the-vortex
The Red Market
www.scottcarney.com/the-red-m...
Listen to the Scott Carney Investigates Podcast on:
UA-cam
• Scott Carney Investigates
Apple:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify:
open.spotify.com/show/5Eez65b...
Anchor:
spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/...
Social Media:
Instagram / sgcarney
Facebook / scottcarneyauthor
Twitter / sgcarney
Bluesky staging.bsky.app/profile/sgca...
©PokeyBear LLC (2023)
Get Exclusive Updates on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=82207370
Newsletter on Substack: sgcarney.substack.com/
I can't understand the hate that is being promoted in this...?? What is the intention. I couldn't finish watching this malicious waste of time
There are so many contradictions in your statements. I don’t think he wants to talk to you nor does he owe you anything. You’re acting like an obsessed Stan. This was so weird.
@@lcjackson1665Scott is using hate and anger to get people to engage with the channel. In star wars, that was called giving into the power of the dark side. i.e. Scott's a parasite. And it worked, because here I am replying to your comment. So now everybody has to unsubscribe to make up it.
@@lcjackson1665 yeah, he ran with a similar, bitter character assassination of Wim Hof over numerous episodes.
Driven by a pathetic need for attention I fear...
I have watched countless hours of Andrew and I skip over the ads. I have never paid a cent. When he says free, it's free
yep
@@greenentrepreneursIt's not free It's your time Your time spent listening to him and your clicks translate into real money for him So he has a massive incentive to keep you interested And in order to do that he needs to post regularly And he does on subjects he has no clue about spreading misinformation Besides you might not be buying his supplements but others do
I have silently (mostly) agreed with Scott for years after seeing through "Hubes'" pro supplement shilling folded in with his so-called science. I simply stopped watching his output. It is clearly balanced toward products for the listener to buy and so as a long time skeptic of advertising, I reject being a mark. People generally have no idea how susceptible the human mind is to suggestion.
Let the listener beware.
Exactly!
Me too.
How many times does SC refer to '30 to 40 minutes of advertising'??
I've never watched more than 30-40 milliseconds of advertising per episode.
And I've also been kinda lazy about clicking the Like button. I'm not even a subscriber.
It's just another slating by Carney, just as he did with Wim Hof.
And neither Hubernan nor WH have seen a single penny from me, whereas I have benefited immensely from their output to a life changing level.
And I was over 60 before I'd heard of either of them.
I guess I'm just not one of the gullible sheep that SC is trying to protect with his unwarranted character assassinations
@@BernadetaJack444none of that is relative to the point of free. The content is still free to the listener if they choose for it to be.
I've listened to some of his podcasts. The ads on supplements are a small section of the whole podcast. I didn't mind them. I appreciated the free information
To his “failure” part of the discussion, I think you could make the argument that getting caught cheating is what he really is referring to.
His response just sounded like thinly veiled justification to me
Yes wants to keep his businesses running and distract us from the fact that he is a master manipulator :)Dr Huberman had a terrible childhood story but he cant use that to sell us on the good but flawed guy story. Inflcting emotional pain on multiple ppl has no excuse really.
@@elise9537 I mean maybe hes a jerk. Does not take away anything from his work and that people can learn from his knowledge.
@@elise9537 some people are just jerks. Doesn't detract from their work or contributions. By all accounts Oppenheimer was a philanderer, but look at his work now, paving the way to clean power for billions.
@@ad-ui6ey if you click on my user name you can see that I never said he should be cancelled, just to be more aware of his potential for harming ppl and working their perception towards his goals. Oppenheimer is a scientist yes, not sure if Dr Hubermans contribution to humanity is going to be as significant. you have to lie A LOT to keep 6 'monogamous' relationship going. just image what kind of tricks youd have to pull. and why would you mess up someone you care for like that?
It didn’t sound like justification. He sounded so ashamed that he barely had it in him to utter the words “six girlfriends.” I think the reason he was talking around in circles is because he’s really ashamed of himself.
Huberman´s argument „if you want to know somebody´s heart look how they treat their animals“ (20:14) is utter nonsense and a false comparative draw. Some psychopathic individuals are known to be animal lovers and kind to them, while being monsters to other people (e.g. Hitler was a great dog lover and also campaigned strongly for animal welfare). The reason for this is that animals bring unconditional love and obedience and therefore a natural dominance structure is possible, unlike with humans. To love animals and treat them right says nothing about how a person will treat other humans.
Absolutely! 👍
Ted Bundy had a younger brother and family that he apparently loved and in his own psychotic way, treated well.
Cluster B Personality Disordered people unfortunately are attracted to money, fame, power, which means they dominate Media & Entertainment, Politics, High Finance.
Sidenote: Very few things in neuroscience are unrelated or have no correlation but one of them literally has 0% correlation...unfortunately, and that is Intelligence and Morality.
Yes that makes sense. I know someone who was a systematic abuser of women but he seems to get on ok with his dog and didn't mistreat him as far as I could tell.
Psychopath seems like a strong word to describe huberman. He might just be a jerk, but not everyone with multiple girlfriends is a psychopath.
@@ad-ui6ey think the term was not directed at Huberman , but in order to defeat the "nice to my dog" argument. Like worse people than him were known dog lovers.
I have always just skipped the advertisements. With UA-cam you are not forced to watch them.
Huberman's response comes off to me as a calculated, rehearsed performance embedded into a conversation with a sympathetic host. He is good at image management.
It occurrd to me some time ago that the trademark black outfit and careful avoidance of discussion about his personal life might signal the conscious creation and protection of a brand.
This probably was written with the help of his PR team. Means they have similar traits so they dont get why a normies brain would see it as highly insensitive towards the ppl he affected. No empathy, no remorse and sucky PR team. They dont even get that its women who are more likely to buy into his sob chilhood stories and be more consistent with purchasing useless products. Matt Rife kind of situation.
Yea the issue is really that he spent so much time fabricating the image of Mr. nice guy.
@@jimmyfitz8168 yes from day one. watch his first interview.
@@jimmyfitz8168 agree… and i always felt it was a facade
The psychologist you interviewed stated a few times to you that she could NOT comment on Andrew Huberman because she has not met and assessed him. So please stop making it sound like she confirmed that he has sociopathic or psychopathic traits. It just discredits yourself and makes you appear to be desperate to prove that your feelings are truth. Even though you have every right to express your pain from the mistreatment/abuse you claim he has done to you, projecting psychiatric diagnosis when it is not your profession is inappropriate at best and very damaging at worst. It’s not a good look.
She did not diagnose him. What I’m saying is that she told me the criteria and based on that I think Huberman is a match.
@sgcarney And your expertise would be . . . ?
You know, this is a lot like First Amendment rights. I may not agree with someone, and I do not belong to any religion, but I support freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
I'm no fan of this guy, but I oppose lynch mobs. You have no idea who is telling the truth here, none. Or, as is likely, to what degree everyone's story contains partial truths, at best.
@@l.w.paradis2108he's not claiming any expertise, he's giving an opinion. We make judgements about people all the time, based on the testimony of people about their behaviour. It's an important part of how we warn each other about an individual's antisocial behaviour. Is it automatically a lynch mob when multiple people come forward to tell others to be careful of someone because they've treated them badly? Of course not. We should always be careful of rumours, gossip, and false accusations, but also listen when different people warn us about individuals in the community who have behaved badly...
@@grazie-dc6we Read what he just said. He is suggesting a serious mental disorder is indeed a "fit." Based on what evidence? If he can say that, then I can say what I said. Bad form!
If you have not verified the story in some manner on your own, then that is exactly what you are pursuing -- mob justice. Notice how you've grown used it? You even think it's socially valuable. (Until some version of it affects you?)
@@l.w.paradis2108 The evidence is the reported behaviour. If it were true that we only make assessments about people based on first hand witnessing of their behaviour, then we would lead very limited lives. We often rely on the reports of members of the community, including in our courts, where convictions do happen based on testimonial evidence alone regularly. But the court of public opinion also does not have the same standards of evidence as our legal courts. If five or six people in your community report that someone has made inappropriate gestures towards their children, you're not going to let your own be unattended around that person just because you haven't experienced that behaviour first hand. You're going to make an assessment of their character based on their reports, unless you have good reason to believe all those people are lying you can and should believe them. It may save your child from harm.
This is how all of us live. We have for a very long time. Assessments of character based on social communication is a central feature of all our social lives.
It's in the realm of public opinion that this person is giving their assessment, based on what they know about psychology and about this person's reported plausible behaviour
I was told by a friend that his spiritual teacher said if you increase your energy you also increase your negative characteristics. So specific meditations can be harmful, because some people cannnot control their increased addictions or negative characteristics. That reminds me of Huberman and his sex addiction, because he makes these endurance meditation without putting an additional focus on the water element or empathy and compassion meditations. At least, I did not find anything in the youtube search bar of this channel about these topics. He cannot control his bad habits, because his teachings are incomplete, in my opinion.
Wow, that’s a really interesting take to me - I don’t know much about meditation, and never knew about the balancing practice that might be needed - makes me wonder about how we in the west use yoga as exercise, almost exclusively - but also, this reminds me of Christian quotes/saying that had to do with idleness and the devils playground - or how when people becomes slightly manic (for whatever reason it may happen), the energy can be useful, but ultimately it’s overflows and becomes destructive - so many other examples of this as a lesson, I’m sure, within different religions, cultures, histories, wisdoms…
Though I personally suspect that the hub’s overwhelming energy may have come from chemical performance enhancers and not just the mind - I relate this to your comment in my experiences to my belief that shortcuts hurt eventually … or there is always a price to pay upfront or in the end
Huberman's use of TRT outpowers his protocol rituals.
@@vwiccy It is called elements in the West and chakras in the East. You basically have to balance the elements earth, water, fire, air and spirit or akasha, those are the first five chakras.
Jesus made the same excercies: loving-kindness is basically the balance of the energy. love is the magnetic fluid and kindness or goodness the electrical fluid. Also having deep respect for everybody is more electrical fluid. Jesus call it love your neighbour as yourself.
Krya Yoga uses those balance excercise, too. (Yogananda also talks about Jesus ironically as a teacher. He appeared to one of his teachers to bring the teaching to the West as far as I remember).
I think it would be called excess Pitta in Ayurveda and excess fire in Chinese Medicine. It’s one of the reasons I stay away from kundalini yoga with all of that breath of fire. 🔥
He has a sex addiction?
Interesting... actually some of the worst people I've met were quite into animals and were very fond of their pets.
Yes. Especially people who like control.
Actually, same.
Disagree. Pets are the best part of humans. But I have no problem thinking that how a man treats women is a huge definer. Talk about liking control -- and never thinking you can get enough of it. When Huberman actually said the words "six girlfriends" I thought he was going to go somewhere real with it. Instead he feints off to something about the definition of girlfriend and slithers away. Also, people who bring up "not being perfect" don`t really want to talk about anything. Character, man. Optimize *that*.
@@Maru-vs9kb There is nothing to disagree with, it's just my experience. Huberman says that if you want to judge the character of someone, look at the way they treat their animals, which would of course be very convenient in these circumstances, but is just not true. Ever heard of Hitler, the guy who kept his dogs by his side right until the end?
I've met both saints and sadists who adore their pets. I don't think it means anything. They're wonderful to have in your life and they're easy to love and make happy. We just need to be careful not to assume someone who's kind to them will be kind to humans
It is strange that H personal life, and business is attacked in same time. It seems that someone wants him down.
Nah Dr Huberman is still doing great and still selling the same stuff.
He was a high ranking prof, who came out about the toxicology on fluoride. For some reason that's a career killer.
@@thesheeplelookupHe didn't come up with fluoride toxicity! 😂😂 He just jumped on the bandwagon That idea has been around for decades He's using it to sell you his yerba mate drink cos it's made with distilled water 😂😂 His podcast is a thinly disguised advertising channel And the episode on fluoride is the best example 'Oh what is this can of yerba mate drink doing on my desk while I'm recording an podcast episode which will be viewed by 6 million people It's a total coincident'
No. People are shocked he would deceive and lie to women. Wow.
Not about liking women - about lying to women.
@@amc3964 its not about the lying. did you actually read the article? you were surprised he likes women?? Its about the extent of the deceit and manipulation. ppl dont switch that on and off. they do the same with all the compartments of their life.
This was an appearance his PR firm set up. It’s not an interview where he gets challenged. Jocko acts like he didn’t know the details of the article and he laughs along with him showing support. Frankly, Huberman isn’t clear and quite vague throughout. Scott, he didn’t address anything. This WAS a PR move.
🎯👍
Its a script and the ppl who helped him seem to be as emotionally numb as he is.
From what I've read I don't know how true it is but from what I've read joker isn't the person he's made himself out to be the all singing all dancing awesome navy SEAL I wonder if he's done half the stuff he makes out of your has
@@joeldavies2718 omg lol he seemed okish too. I dont like the big bulky guy esthetic, JW seems like hed watch you bleed and tell you to get over, Dr Huberman seemed like he means well but he is not going to be interested in any of your issues if you want to be around him. I am now disappointed that I gotta second guess and look up many of the infos he puts out there.
Sociopath: “we really shouldn’t pathologize bad behaviors and label people sociopaths, and also, I really loved my dog so I’m definitely not a sociopath.”
He’s making himself as a good guy cause he cared for his dog so therefore he’s not a narcissist or sociopath. Fucking ridiculous!
Ppl with narcisstic neuroticism have more empathy for their pets rather than humans.
Sociopath tell lies manipulate control Humans
Sociopath loves animals bec no judgement and forever Loyal
Why do we have to believe any of this? Or take sides, much less think any of you are in a position to diagnose anyone?
Seriously?
Whatever his faults (errors/biases/overreaches/philandering) - it should not be a controversial assessment that Andrew Huberman is CLEARLY very, very far from sociopathic. Despite all his shortcomings (known/suspected/unknown/unsuspected), he is demonstrably and sincerely energized by whatever small but dignified contribution he can make for his fellow humans during his short time on earth. This should be apparent... Just as surely as his shortcomings and biases and lifetime errors should not only give all of us valuable experience in maintaining our own individual, unique independence of mind and opinion; but should also remind and reassure each of us, privately, that _our own personal, crooked, error-prone, outwardly-unsuccessful path is par for our own legitimate course - as Andrew's path likewise is, for his outwardly successful course._ He's no fucking greater and no fucking worse, as a human who's being, than we are - TRULY. He's doing pretty good, for a human; has some important knowledge to share; is yet another inspired soul who's alive right now, with us - and us with him.
I go DEEP on fair criticism - of HIM, and of EVERYONE (most of all myself, I hope) - and DEEP on fair respect _paid_ to those who seriously deserve some respect. 👍
Scott comes across as jealous and vindictive here. Not really saying anything unique or insightful.
I actually thought it was a fair analysis. You must be a Huberman fan. Good luck with those supplements.
@@JC-jr9hw and...?
@@JC-jr9hw I think Huberman fine and like anyone else you listen to you need to take everything that he says with a healthy skepticism. I don’t believe in demonizing people.
@@3buzzyI think you're being a hypocrite.
That's pretty much exactly what I just said he comes across as such a jealous sad person
Excellent, nuanced, super interesting analysis. Thanks for putting this out. Important to remember that everything is connected, because integrity is fundamental to all areas of life. Character does matter. How we do anything is how we do everything.
The dog talk was definitely cherry picking distraction. He does seem to at least have some sex/love addiction going on. Wouldn't be surprised if it went into sociopathic levels, especially as evidenced by his severe needs for control & power.
Blaming the victim by saying "the internet is borderline" is disavowing his responsibility for the power that comes w huge platforms. The entire quandary is a real part of "ordinary people blowing up on the internet," and yet still wanting to retain their right to privacy & human frailties....
Lol
Most ppl who do horrific acts blame it on their life situation, society, their victims and ao on.
Hi Scott, thanks for making this really important reaction to it. I am really dissapointed from a scientific stand point. I actually don't want to talk alot about this but now I am thinking to make a video about his "i have been long in the academic setting". I am a scientist in Europe and of course I cannot speak about the public funding in USA but what I can talk about is his duties as a professor. I would love to know how he teaches because I think he is not doing his duty. Moreover, it is a huge red flag for me if his lab has been shrunken down.
Thanks a lot again for your time and dedication to actually educate people on his manipulative nature. Keep going!
🕵️♂️
Gosh, 90% of what you are saying appears as based on assumptions!
Looks like he aged 15 years in the last month... doesn't look healthy at all.
T
Working 70 hours a week on business deals/investments, juggling girlfriends, writing his book and image repair. Maybe more prep for the podcast would rectify some of his science related problems
Huberman has looked progressively less healthy over the last couple years despite the optimization program he "sells" . I wouldn't be surprised if his program as applied to himself has been reduced to weight training and trt
I was thinking exactly the same! The difference between how he looks now and some earlier videos seem like at least a decade So I was really shocked to find out that he only started podcasting during Covid so only 3 or 4 years ago Clearly he's not practicing his own protocols And therefore they are not proven Therefore he is selling snake oil
Stopped taking TRT?
He deflects and tries to charm by bringing up how good he is to his dog. Why doesn’t he address the rage towards his girlfriend(s)?
I don’t think his fame was a surprise. I think he was working on this for several years and posting UA-cam videos for many years. He then hired a team who could do a podcast with great production value. There are comments on his Instagram from his earliest followers where they remind him of when he was basically begging for followers because he needed to make the 10k follower milestone.
The ad that UA-cam pre-rolled was for a gummie that gives you your daily greens. 🤣
Hahahaha
He also looks like he’s aged 20 years… isn’t he in his late 40’s .. he looks terrible for someone pitching health supplements…. Bad for the brand 😂
Fully agree!
Beard has gone full grey ?
Jocko's silly black and white filter doesn't help , makes him look like he is either no longer with us - or he is appearing in one of those classic b&w courtroom dramas 😂😂😂
Trt
OMG as if these women hadn’t tried to have a conversation with him.
I think we we have just scratched the surface of the Huberman story.
His real origin story, academic conduct and relationship history may prove interesting if someone does further investigation.
Do tell!
And why should we care? What is so important about this guy that warrants our attention beyond The New York Magazine article?
@@firewithfire848 he has a huge audience that believe every word he says as gospel, very cult like. He’s a liar and scammer in his personal life and a scammer to his audience
@@Saturnreturn123 Again, why should we care? And how do you know his audience believes "every word he says as gospel"? He has a few million subscribers on this channel alone. Do you believe all of them never question, research or fact check anything he says. That they hang on to his every word during every 3 hour podcast he puts out? I find that hard to believe. And what about the people he interviews? They're professionals in their fields, do you believe they're liars and scammers as well?
@@firewithfire848 not every follower of course. But the majority do. Have you seen his comment sections? He’s like their cult leader guru. His guests? They’re not the ones getting paid to sell bullshit products.
Your integrity in your personal life informs and demonstrates your true character. If you are prepared to lie and harm the people you care about the most, how can you have integrity in other aspects of your life? He can't be trustworthy, personally or professionally. That's an objective deduction, not subjective. In fact, I used to listen to his podcast. Thought was interesting and he came across well.
Agree
Integrity… doing the right thing even when no one is looking…. That’s the sad part. Huberman comes across as a guy with integrity. We want to trust him and and what he says. One can’t pick and choose when to apply integrity. I know, “Everyone’s human!”. But 6 women deceived… he could have just told them all he not exclusive and may never be? I’m sure there are women out there who don’t want commitment either!!
I still listen to him but I am reay amazed that Dr. Huberman is the opposite of the image he was working on. He didnt seem empotionally friendly but I didnt think hes into fabricating entire stories and manipulating the perception of the ppl he is dating. He did a lot of harm and he is showing no remorse.
Imagine telling people to look up the word replete. Sums him up. Narcissist. And I am qualified to provide diagnoses.
Yes! So condescending and pretentious
@@Saturnreturn123…and in complete harmony with his ego.
What time stamp?
@@chiccavaquita 37:11
@@Saturnreturn123 oh ew he’s gross
This is the first video of yours I've watched but wanted to say thank you for the nuanced perspective on a truly odd "speaking out" scenario. Appreciate your character and integrity that shows in this response video, especially because that is what is the most disturbing about the Huberman debacle, the lack of integrity and character, in behavior and also in his acknowledgment here.
Didn't watch, because I could care less. But I'm guessing it took Andrew this long to respond because he needed to figure the best way to quasi-take blame for his actions while significantly reducing the perception of how bad his negative actions toward women appear to his viewers and fans. No?
Something like that.
Takes him that long to do the manipulative tap dance. ✅️
He said they weren't his girlfriends.
No one is perfect. Don't judge on the basis of allegations. He has done already a good job of giving out useful content for his audience.you don’t know other side of the story.
@@shameemahmed7079 useful content and garbage. And up to his audience to figure out which is which, yet he presents garbage as useful content. Be careful
I lost count of the whistles, signals, inferences that he's been misunderstood, mislabeled, and is innocent. Seems to me that he is a master of the art of manipulation. Love what you did with this video. Your analysis is helpful, clear and compassionate.
Of course he's talking to Jocko when he does this. Someone who won't challenge him.
No one challenges anyone in the top tier of podcasters. They all just affirm one another.
@@sgcarney yep! Just another sociopathic echo chamber like corporate CEOs
If a friend was at your house opening up to you about him and his 6 girlfriends, would you antagonistically challenge his character? Y’all are a bunch of losers.
@@sgcarney it’s quite a phenomenon what has happened on social media. Have people always behaved like this? I suspect yes.
@@francorodriguez8252🤡
Not going to lie I doubted the truth of the hit piece until this interview. It is clear that it was probably true given his response not speaking plainly and being purposefully vague. He talked primarily about the nature of humans and grander concepts rather than addressing particular claims. If it all was lies then he would've used this opportunity to completely refute all of the claims.
It’s hilarious how so many Huberfans are enraged by the NY Mag article and calling it a “hit piece,” when really it’s inevitable that someone with such a huge audience and so much influence will face criticism, no matter what they are saying or trying to sell. And despite this “hit piece” going into great detail about Huberman’s sexual dalliances, it more importantly shines a light on how much bs neurotic pseudo-science and supplements this salesman is selling to all of us. I really gave his podcast a fair try, but quickly realized that he must not do his homework on a lot of the claims that some of his guests (like David Sinclair) are making, which are frankly, unsubstantiated weak science nonsense. He also has a great knack at taking scientific concepts that are relatively simple, and complicating them with long-winded over explanations and tangential side quips that don’t help to illustrate whatever point he was trying to make at all. Then I saw what Huberman looks like/his carefully crafted image of “I’m a Stanford-adjacent member of the scientific elite who is such a punk-nerd, that my wardrobe should remind people of Steve Jobs, but really I’m just another Elizabeth Holmes.” And it worked/is still working. I want to say that I can’t believe how many people find him irresistible despite how obviously full of crap he is, but apparently we all love a big steaming pile o’crap. Just try to listen to him recite his origin story about how he was some neglected, troubled youth who overcame all the odds stacked against him to be where he is today because of his discipline and grit. If you weren’t born yesterday, your bullshit meter will be sounding the alarm that dude bro is a poser, His daddy was a Stanford professor, which means that Huberman is Stanford legacy, which means that he was essentially guaranteed a position at this prestigious name-brand institution from birth. Grit and discipline my ass!!! I have a hunch that Stanford must be getting something in return for him name dropping the university on his show. I’d like to see some journalism investigating that thread.
Well put
Great comment !
Sounds like sour grapes.
@@Paythepipertoplay your unsubstantive comment ? Yes indeed !
@tk80mufa5 how scientific you are. No one ever replies to my comments. I am glad you took the time.
If being cheated on sucks so much (as he says), why would he do that to others? He doesn’t address why he treats others so poorly. As someone with a psychology background, where is the self-reflection (although he claims to do that)?
And he always made a point that he is a trustable person.
Huberman is narcissistic, and he seems to hide deception in vaguess and excessive words.
*Hubes is the most normal guy I know* 😅
It is always easier to attain the illusion of rising by lowering others than it is to actually rise up yourself…
Costello being cold was breaking his heart but not transmitting a potentially deadly disease to the person you suppositly love..where is the empathy for that?When people tell you about their exes being crazy,run.No accountability for their part
Some people are crazy though. Not everyone is nice. So if the exes of huberman tell someone oh my ex was crazy then they should run?
@@VeganofSuburbia Yes I was just thinking that. Two of my boyfriends were very problematic, it's the truth. Current one is ok though. I guess you just have to observe the rest of people's behaviour.
Scott! Thanks for posting this video
Okay i get your Point and i also Think he is Strange psychologically maybe because hes on testo but what i dont understand is… Why is it a bad thing he earns money with Sponsoring… hes Not an angel he earns Money with doing Podcast etc…. There is not a Problem with it. And the viewer dont have to buy anything so ?! Greetings from Germany
Conflict of interest / reduced objectivity / suddenly talking covertly about "science" that "coincidentally" supports his sponsor's products
Your MD doctor also talks about science while covertly meeting with drug representatives daily - ones that give them trips and vacation seminars that are only a couple hours each morning with free meals and subsidized lodging - even CRUISES!!! And people don’t even ask what perks their doctor takes to prescribe each medicine. Money isn’t everything but try going to the grocery store without it! Women will always seek out millionaires and yes he is grandiose but that does not make his science wrong.
@@Sandy-ne4zt are you adressing me? How do you know if i have seen a doctor in the last 20 years at all?
Which country are you talking about?
The practices you are mentioning are increasingly being rolled back due to increased transparency demands , because they are also quite bad.
So , if you were making the argument that it's ok for Huberman to do it , because all the MD's are doing it - bad argument / bad logic.
Both covert practices are anti-integrity.
@@Sandy-ne4ztExcept his science IS wrong A lot of what he said in many areas is just pure jibberish as it turns out So what is the point of listening to him and then having to spend time checking that what he said is correct? Waste of time..
Isn’t science trial and error? And isn’t everything he talks about cited and credited ?
11:15 notice the increased use of fillers words, using “like” every other word. Listened to a lot of his podcast guest appearances and never once heard him do this. Could be indicative of lying. Also the “diabolical mastermind” comment, basically making a parody of what’s contained in the article and mocking it despite there being some serious allegations - and never once addressing the actual allegations. Deflection and defensiveness on display. I wonder why?
He’s minimizing and trying to make himself look less competent and more relatable
Yes I noticed that too, and that is not how profesional, inteligente scientists talk.. That's like how a skateboarding street kid like talks, man ;)
A great observation.
He's not only 'not addressing' the allegations He never denied any of them and there can only be one reason for it: because what the article says is true Just saying he never said he is perfect is laughable and arrogant
@@BernadetaJack444 yea, good point. Never denies a thing, just gaslights, deflects and acts defensive and mocking. That’s how he treated those women too, so it’s not surprising
What's he been accused of and what is the evidence? I'm only hearing it now and can't find a thing online
Read the article.
His non verbal body language is really tell tale to watch. Verbal is quite controlled, but NV is giving away what you are saying.
Hey Scott, where's the original podcast. I want to watch that first before I watch your vid :) I can't seem to find it. Or I'm using the wrong search terms.
It's mentioned right at the beginning. Jocko's podcast #4XX or something.
"The party line becomes the only line" very well said ... reminds me of the name that shall not be said further in the east
For a good time, drink every time Scott says "problematic".
As always, Scott, well done. Love your reporting
Thanks again!
I loved Hubermans content but hated he experimented on animals….
“How you do anything is how you do everything.” -Martha Beck
A Einstein wasn't a good spouse either but can you say that he wasn't a great physicist?
There are exceptions to the rule. You’re right about Einstein. But I think there is some truth to the quote. And I think Huberman is a douche. Just my opinion.
1. He lied to multiple partners about being in a monogamous, exclusive, relationship with them. He lied and serially cheated in order to maintain these multi-state partners, all of whom thought they were exclusive. I.e. the issue is the compulsive cheating and lying, not necessarily the multiple partners. None of his partners thought he was 'single.'
2. He was repeatedly, and with multiple partners, emotionally abusive and manipulative.
3. He had unprotected sex with them on the implicit assumption of those lies, and one of his partners (at least) contracted HPV.
4. He monetises through association and promotion of dubious companies (AG1).
5. He brands himself a Stanford Professor yet his lab is largely defunct, and he mostly teaches long distance.
You know what Trump said, "When you're a star, they let you do it." Powerful men think the rules don't apply to them. Did we forget to be kind and responsible?
How do i find this clip without the commentary?
You watch the whole video where it was originally posted.
Thank you for the thoughtful balanced analysis and for providing context where it was needed.
I understand why you would rather the focus be on how casually he slips pseudo science and unsubstantiated claims into his podcast while simultaneously presenting himself as the standard bearer for the scientific method; but I do actually think his cheating matters as well. Not because it's juicy (it's not), no it matters because his podcast is largely focused on how to live a healthy life and he often speaks about how mental health is necessary for overall wellbeing. He notes correctly that mental health is far more than just the absence of mental illness, and has detailed podcasts on how to promote mental health. He discusses how important personal relationships are to our mental health. So is cheating and lying and manipulating and bullying others conducive to one's mental health? Does cheating and lying create those strong interpersonal relationships that build mental health?
He has massive influence. I hope young men don't walk away thinking that the key to happiness is being able to lie to and bully the women in their life. That's not "winning"! Let's take a page out of Ghandi's book and consider that happiness comes when what you say, think, and do are all in harmony.
Other than the Ghandi reference at the end ( he was a guru creep himself ) , an otherwise good comment. 👍🎯
Don't really have much hope for " young men " in the age of Andrew T. unfortunately.
@@tk80mufa5 I'm not expert enough on Ghandi to make a judgement call there, but I hear you and I appreciate the irony you spotted and I missed when giving the attribution. Speaking entirely for myself, I know that I am content, happy, at peace, etc. when my words, and actions and thoughts are all aligned, and I strongly suspect it is the same for most of us. :)
@@katenowell-smith6602 ✌😊
It’s hysterical to me that so many people have jumped on the “Huberman bad” bandwagon as if he had ever held himself out to be a moral role model, spiritual advisor or life compass to anyone at all. He’s a neuroscientist who studies and reports on bio hacking human health. Get over yourselves people in expecting him to be some righteous pillar of society when all he’s ever held himself out to be is a research scientist. People who live in glass houses throwing stones left and right here are so pathetic.
Agreed, I give Jack shit what he does in his personal life.i watch his UA-cam videos for info because he hosts brilliant guests and I use the knowledge to improve MY life. FFS people worry about your own life.
I really cannot understand how any person can defend someones emotionally abusive behaviour, if it indeed happened the way it was described (credibility is the only point of debate I can accept in this case).
This could easily be looked at as "sexual coersion" - which can include getting someone to sleep with you by telling them lies. This is no small "did a bad thing" matter. It's not hard to imagine how it could lead to emotional damage in form of trust issues, which could seriously impact further relationships. It's just a form of emotional and sexual abuse.
There is definitely no need for a successful, self-aware, intelligent and good looking guy to do that to get laid, so other than utter lack of concern for others wellbeing I can't think of much to drive someone in that position to such behaviours.
It's certainly worth at least criticizing and calling it out because unscrupulous people unfortunately only respond to consequences. And it's very much worth taking behaviour into consideration before supporting someone (even if the content is free - having millions of followers always leads to financial and personal advantages), especially if it's via the 10 dollar a month members club.
Nothing ever wrong with questioning if the money will be used for flights to a couple more women.
I'm not sitting in any glass house as I have never done anything in that dimension of "badness", which I assume is true for the other people here too. It's of course debatable but even if I other had done similarly bad things - it's also about the attitude afterwards.
The minimum one should be at least owning up to that behaviour, being apologetic and changing ones behaviour in the future. Without that minimum there is nothing to "get over". And criticism is just the fair reaction of a society that doesn't want everyone going havoc and taking advantage of each other.
PS: There seems to be a region in the default mode network responsible for "moral reasoning". Something like a moral IQ I guess. It just comes to mind if I read things like that.
YES! Exactly!
Except he DID create an online persona in order to gain people's trust which is different to who he actually is A red flag maybe? He did it for financial gain (his advice is misleading and sometimes false Can cause harm and is designed to encourage you to buy supplements which are not proven to be beneficial or better than others) A red flag maybe? He doesn't only talk about health hacks He talks about self introspection, self improvement, self regulation, comments on religion ,emotions, relationships etc So yes it is important for people to know that in his personal life he displays sociopathic tendencies and uses sexual cohesion Enjoy listening to Huberman but just take him for what he is and do check his advice before you implement/ buy anything
Huberman is an epic human being... This dude is just flying high an annoying ego trip... getting views from ripping apart an awesome human being trying to legitimately help us all.
1. Mr. Andrew is promoting consumerism and materialism like posting videos on X wearing Roka hat and drinking Yerba Mate in a grocery store (Sir Andrew please pay First)
2. During Sir Andrew’s live Q&A event in Sydney, Australia the slides on screen had 8sleep and AG1, your audience paid for the brain body contract not NASCAR
3. Mr. Andrew - here’s a suggestion; at your next live event be like Oprah Winfrey “YOU get AG1, 8sleep, Roka and Yerba Mate” and conduct your guest interviews with logos, AG1, 8sleep and Roka across your signature black shirts
4. Andrew please don’t get tattoos of AG1, 8sleep, Roka and Yerba Mate on your Forehead - I fear you will become like a mouse, pressing on lever because it’s all about the Benjamins
5. Sir Andrew is being exploitative and pimping out his viewers like ME with greed of cash money. During Dr. David Yeager interview, Mr. Andrew is drinking from a Yerba Mate cup - recommendation show us the brewing process as well next time
6. I don't recall Dr. Stephen Hawking selling his soul for dead presidents and disguise his behavior under the umbrella of Science
7. Sir Andrew is shielding his immoral actions in the “interest of Science” his audience/viewers is becoming his grand experiment to promote himself
8. Sir Andrew shirtless tiktok video is a prime example, here’s another suggestion Mr. Andrew - release a sex tape title “Andrew Huberman Does Dallas - brain body contract”
9. As an aspiring black female Neuroscientist, I’m deeply haunted by the path you’re paving for my generation
10. Sir Andrew rebrands Eastern practice and philosophies (Hinduism, Buddhism, Ayurveda) on sleep, light, mediation ex: Yoga Nidra repackage as “non sleep deep rest”
11. Mr. Andrew is like a used car salesman - Zero cost website Huberman Lab bait and switch Huberman Lab Premium $100 annually and where to buy HIS supplements/tickets to live events
12. Mr. Andrew is an illusionist, weaving a classic tale of a turbulent past to captivate his viewers with eloquent word fillers - recommendation sell your biopic to Hollywood, perhaps the Rock to depict you
13. Mr. Andrew claims he reads ALL his UA-cam comments, so this is MY experiment - please response within 7 days (not by one of your hired Drones)
14. Sir Andrew please restructure your unethical behavior and address ALL my concerns in the “interest of Science” and please don’t apply the Tom Brady excuse - every Podcaster does it to offset cost
15. I promoted you to my inner circle but lately we feel like geese - forced fed materialism consumerism to increase your investments and bankroll
I sent the above Andrew Huberman/friends and his sponsors.
This journalist is heartbroken with a BIG BIAS that Huberman stood him up and left him dog-sitting at the Huberman home for 16 hrs for free under the guise of an interview... lol... actually hilarious story!
4 mins... I'm out lol back to Huberman Lab podcast ;-)
I appreciate this break down of the article 😊🙏🏼 thank you.
Thank you, Scott! You are honestly and courageously bringing up so many important themes to advance our collective integrity in the way information is conveyed publicly through this age of information overload. Yes, fame absolutely comes with responsibility! And if Huberman “Intentionally” mis directed all of us with bad science - then shame on him !! He should tell us all “honestly” where he did this and i can then work on repairing my respect for him. We live in an age where honest, intelligent, noble, wise, information is more important than ever as the power that be, who have a little knowledge our our evolved neurophsyiological mechanisms can really do more harm than good when selling a yarn instead of honestly conveying the information with no strings attached Also, why why - when someone makes enough money and the Maslow hierarchy of needs is totally taken care of do people continue to sell out if not syccombing to their own addictions power and control … our collective character needs to stand on trail alongside the amplification of information ! I can rambe on and on about the pandora’s box of wisdom your questions unravel when you do this kind of journalism. I heard the other say that the etymology of the word rational comes from the meaning of “ratio” proper proportion of things and the more light that is shined on ourselves and everything for that matter the more the shadow is revealed !! I believe good character requires a deep understanding of this - when work hard to find a center in our imperfect selves we can come from less polarization “sane to crazy spectrum” and if more of the people that become famous see this then you won’t have to do pieces like this anymore 😂
Carney reminds me of Strauss in the Oppenheimer movie. Has a insatiable desire to be respected and successful but watches someone achieve that in a short amount of time. Then he becomes convinced that Huberman maliciously disrespected him and develops an obsession to take him down. Oh the irony!
Say what you want about me, but how dare you compare Robert Oppenheimer, a scientist and national hero who struggled with the morality of his impact on the world, to Andrew Huberman: a scientific grifter who makes $20 million a year shilling supplements to the masses.
@@sgcarney
Say what you want about his moral compass, Huberman is far more than a grifter (yes, the comparison to Oppenheimer is ridiculous. However - it is apt to note Robert was also a prolific womeniser).
Nevertheless, I've been really impressed with your work, Scott! I'm currently completing a Master's in Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St Andrews and you've provided much inspiration!
Why is this even on my feet? I don’t care.
@@sgcarney If you were interpreting this as an exactly identical representation then at least the lesson of the story was that with time the integrity of both parties became known eventually. If you claim rock solid integrity in the content of your allegations then it should work out for you.
@oliverhalyckyj1998 You're right, it's not apt to compare Lewis Strauss' success either. Also Huberman isn't married?
Ironically, Huberman has a video describing his experience with a former colleague who did not actually care about understanding the brain but it was his way of exercising pure ambition. Great podcast!
Exactly, first it was Hoff and now Huberman, more importantly who is funding Carney? That's the question wr should be asking? WHO PAYS this guy to attack self help people? IS HE Being funded by someone? , Someone that I know in a media management organization in L.A. claims, he's being paid for by a particular political party to push an agenda. When you get paid $10,000 a month to push a particular narrative it's not that hard to see how it's valuable to put three videos out a month to make $10,000 pretty easy choice to make.
Are you envious. Humm. He is amazing.
You appear to be very envious of Andrew.
Yeah, his biggest dream is to make millions making up shit, distorting science, pretending to be scientific, cheating on 6 women at once.. Or perhaps, not everyone is 19 years old?
You are a JRE fan aren't you?
Funny how quick people switch. A lot of comments were Huberman's groupies with your first vid. Now most are on your side.
Internet’s new hobby: cancelling people
Huberman’s podcasts are brilliant. They educate, inform and have helped thousands with health and fitness. If he’s making buckets of money, good for him! He has worked hard. He’s genuine and has integrity, that is apparent from the people who come back to his podcast repeatedly. Dr Huberman’s personal life is not my business-I’ve got my own. However, I can see how such a handsome, intelligent and successful man could make a man with a low subscription number on his UA-cam channel and a high, whiny voice could become jealous. Just an observation.
You say that he is genuine and has integrity - how do you know that? He's just been exposed as a sexual predator and manipulator... You only know about him what he is willing to show you in his online videos You assume he is genuine and has integrity because his online persona is convincing His personal life is his own business but it is important to the extent that it informs about his motivation and how he operates
If you are a friend of Scott run from him as fast as possible! If you make him mad he will then spend all of his time attacking you online. A true sociopath,
If you are my friend and they you turn into a monster shilling pseudoscience then you can absolutely expect me to tell the world about it.
At 33:18 Scott nails it here. Huberman has an amazing mind but he doesn’t understand the price and responsibility of fame. He could be honest about why he takes sponsorships from supplement companies and still be a legitimate scientist. Doing good in the world and making a living can be synonymous.
Portrait of a dissociative psychopath … I think his child selves are the ones who were “mean” to his gfriends
You are my first favorite Journalist! Your comments are so spot on❤
Do a video series by picking each supplement product in his podcasts by analyzing and fact checking those supplements.
There is one part of the podcast where he talks about going out to bars in SD and seeing SEAL guys enter and saying "it's time to leave." Might be a minor detail but there is folklore about SEALS getting in tons of fights but facing little consequences as they were needed on missions. There have been allegations made by Eric Demming against Jocko. I have no idea of the veracity of the allegations but the "above the law" attitude of SEALS has ben mentioned by many, even Jocko in a sideways kind of way where he mentioned that many SEALS had an almost criminal way of doing things. Basically an "ends justify the means" mentality.
Interesting.
A while back there were SEALs speaking out all masked up (hoodies , caps , sunglasses , face masks , gloves ) on national TV, it should be up on YT.
They basically went up against the culture , "an evil group within" .
said that first of , there are too many ex SEALs cashing in , writing books , and becoming public personas ( they never mentioned names but probably Jocko , Goggins , Rob O'??? - guy who proclaims to have done UBL , ... , etc. ) .
They asked "what happened to *the quiet professional* ?"
Then they mentioned the relevation of tactics in movies and tv ( ' Zero Dark Thirty ' (2012) & ' Captain Phillips ' (2013) & ' 13 Hours ' (2016) for example )
Last but not least , they mentioned the evil group within the SEALs / community , intimidating others , doing d..gs and selling d..gs and a lot more.
Probably the ones you are referring to.
Buffalo Bill or whoever it was on Silence of the Lambs ..... had a Dog them cared for Dearly between skinning his human victims ?
Bro, Silence of the Lambs was a MOVIE. As in fake, made up.. might wanna reconsider your comment 😂
in a way, huberman is to science what taylor swift is to football :)
Text him, Scott! See if he’ll do an interview!!
In the video clips you showed, Huberman appears to be a very congenial, charming, genuine guy. He even seems self-deprecating and humble at times.
That is not the Huberman I sensed in his podcasts, however. Despite my intense interest in neuroscience, I couldn’t watch Huberman’s videos for more than a few minutes without feeling rising alarm. His verbal delivery, body language, expressions, and video production style made every hair in my hackles stand at stiff attention. Some of my female friends felt the same way. He gave off distinctly arrogant, abusive “bro” vibes that sent us into high alert.
I would love to see an honest discussion with “the real Andrew Huberman,” whoever that turns out to be. People are complicated and dynamic. The fact that he loves and dotes on his dog tells me nothing. He needs a worthy adversary and a longer, unstructured interview to tease apart his complex character. Which probably means he won’t do it.
Vastly shrunk lab, that single postdoc's hanging on!
In fairness, being able to espy his lab might itself be a lab experiment testing visual fields and optic nerve sensitivity.
So his audience has a low level of consciousness 😂
Your personal experience with AH adds value to this analysis. He has great responsibility with his visibility.
He makes 20 mil in sponsorships because of an ex girlfriends opinion. The gold standard of scientific evidence being applied here.
I don’t understand.
@@sgcarney They are saying you are failing to use the same level of scrutiny and scientific standards you are holding Huberman too and by doing so very likely spreading misinformation based on hearsay.
@sgcarney that says all you need to know about this video.
Genuine question: are you trolling when you pronounce his name "Hooberman" when everyone else says "Hyuberman"? I like your content, just wondered for a while!
How does Andrew say it? I know someone with that last name and they pronounce it HOOBERMAN
I mispronounce it a lot. I also mispronounce "tinnitus." It's not personal. Just pronouncing how it's spelled.
What's this thing about needing to handle private issues publicly? .. if you have an issue with him maybe you should Take it up with him, man to man.
I addressed this very specifically in the video. His actions are in public. And I work in the public interest.
Speaking of supplements there is this thing called the placebo effect and the more you pay for it the stronger the effect becomes. But you all know that.
I have come to see many of his protocols as potentially useful placebo-based rituals.
They get you out of bed early in the morning and provide expectations that you can improve your health by taking some simple actions.
Cold showers, viewing early morning light, delaying caffeine... are probably not the important factors improving the lives of his followers.
@@fredgronlund441 Do they still work when you know they are a placebo? My grandma told me to get up early, exercise, hydrate and eat well when I was 5 but she didn't try to sell me expensive supplements🤣
Well, I know that tenured professors can be removed if they prove to be too much of an embarrassment for the university. I actually worked with an ex-professor before.
That would backfire. He can play the cancelled card and it will just make him more popular.
@@martinpaddle It depends on what a person is cancelled for. It also depends on whether the person has the means to hire good lawyers and publicists.
Love your video
I cannot get over his "new outfit"
Is his objective to deviate from his regular black on black to "relate" to the audience?
He is just not a good person if so many stories are available.
This black-on-black always-the-same-outfit-style thing stems from him wanting to imitate Steve Jobs , Mark Zuckerberg , Elizabeth Holmes , Lex Friedman (!!!) and every hardcore punk kid , and every smug artsy fartsy person out there.
With that wardrobe choice he easily could have become a modern architect who specializes in soulless glass-steel-cubes as well. 😂
Love Rhonda Patrick!! thanks for mentioning her
Listen he does not hide that has been seen psychiatrist for many years and still does! He is in the trends of today ,banalizing.😊
People become famous, they don't become saints. They don't all of a sudden become completely aware of all their flaws and how to fix them.
It seems as though he was more concerned with people saying he’s sociopathic or narcissistic than actually acknowledging the facts. He cares so much about his image than his character and integrity. This guy is messy AF and I can’t listen to him talk down to his audience anymore. He’s absolutely full of shit and thinks he’s better than everyone.
Thing is...his Pr team is similar minded so they have no idea why we find what he did really worrisome. They put out scripts that dont make any sense to a normative brain.
He's a bloody Israeli, what more needs to be said?
About offering free information, and being sponsored by various companies... I don't see this as contradictory, or nefarious (as you seem to) at all. It's like commercials on commercial television, which in the old days, we all understood was how television was paid for, (I have a degree in this, yes, from Stanford) but... not all went to the production companies... the advertisers profited, and those selling ads profited, etc. But this is different, and better. Because in the old days, things weren't recorded, listeners/viewers had to sit through the commercials. Now you can look below his podcast where the timeline is written out there for you to see and the timing and names of the sponsored ads ARE LISTED and you can just start in at 7 minutes or whatever and AVOID them. And yes you are getting a lot of information for free. You're only stuck hearing the ads if you listen live. I bet a relatively small portion of his audience does that. In any case.... how is that deceitful? Do NOT get your argument here at all. You are really reaching on this, and you repeat it many times.
You may now know this, but news programs on TV and print always had a firewall between advertising and editorial. This is because when there isn't one editorial independence dies. Here's an article about it from the Columbia Journalism Review. www.cjr.org/politics/fortifying_the_firewall.php
Carrying on from the above. The issues about his personal life are a completely separate issue. I don't condone cheating. And agree with you that it is a failure of character. (But just to mention are all the finger pointers, including you, absolutely pristine in this department?) But when the initial article also took aim at a lot other random stuff like... it implied he didn't have a lab or do research (a position Stanford officially refuted) and he worried perhaps excessively or even obsessively about his dog (okay, kinda odd but so what). Since he's not podcasting romance advice, I'm going to continue to listen to what I find a refreshing and useful bunch of scientific information delivered in an entertaining and energetic fashion. He's pretty clear about the level of validation the various theories have had. I get a lot out of this. But... were I the right age, would I date this carwreck of a boyfriend? Hell no. But I don't tune in for that.
He’s weaving in pseudoscience to his podcast that supports the sales of his bullshit supplements. His free information that he provides is therefore tainted and can’t be trusted. This is the problem.
@@bonniemacbird I agree that everyone has the right to privacy, but the reason why Huberman's private live is of public interest is because it reveals the false online image he created which he uses to gain people's trust. That trust translates into the amount of viewers on his platform That in turn translates into how attractive his podcast is to sponsors Once sponsoring is involved, his loyalty is to them not to you So when he recommends cold plunges over vaccinations to stave off cold and flu, denigrates melatonin in favour of other more expensive sleep supplements, pushes yerba mate over coffee - you know when it's coming from - just look at his list of sponsors and the companies he co owns He deeply cares about his image because he is benefitting from it
so when are you going to investigate and do journalism on mp-usa?
I just looked them up. It's in my wheelhouse, but I have a lot more to get to before that.
@@sgcarney I honestly think you should just forget everything else and focus on mp-usa... I think it is either going to change the world or its going to be one of the biggest fraud in the world. Either way you will be surprised and nothing else will compare to it.
Havent been following what hes been up to ... But his dog story reminded me of Norms Hitlers Dog Joke ... He does come across rather Robotic with all his OCD Protocols ... Abusers are quite often Charasmatic Cold Manipulators ... good at playing Mr Nice Guy when its to their benefit .
Whats the added value of this criticism..
That sums up Scott's career.
Six likes and counting
Just curious about the incorrect information on sugar, please? :)
Apparently he said that sugar in fruit is bad but i watched the episode on it and the guest literally said fruit is ok if its not juice. When you make it into a juice you remove the fibre and your body doesn't digest it slow which in turn causes a spike in sugar in your blood and then a crash. A smoothie or whole fruit on the other hand doesn't because of the fibre. Your body takes longer to digest that and in turn the sugar gets released gradually and doesn't cause a spike.
@@VeganofSuburbia thats still the same sugar that is bad alone is it not but with the fiber its fine so he isnt really wrong
Saying advertising-based content is free is obviously a fib and by now everyone should know. We're all informed enough about the economy of attention, I thought.
I really appreciate your take and hope more people hear this. I am in academia but don't think I would ever want to do science communication because to actually be honest often requires a lot of additions and caveats. But I also don't want science communication to sell unsubstantiated protocols along with reporting of scientific results.
Honesty is generally underpaid and under publicized. Much more profitable to just tell people what they want to hear.
@@sgcarney Even in actual scientific publications, unfortunately. Thank you for the nuance!
@sgcarney Are you jelous? :)
no. Are you?
@@sgcarney Nothing to be jelous of here. Came here thinking I'll hear something I haven't heard before, but all I see is a try hard "journalist" making guesses.
It's very cheap. I've got no respect for this.
Doesn't matter. I will still watch "Andrew Huberman" podcast.....
Just curious, what are your credentials Scott? At least on his podcasts you can skip over the commercials and they don't have random interruptions with loud obnoxious content like there is here. Just like old fashioned radio when they had sponsors and the host would speak out the ad.
Google my credentials.
“It becomes dangerous to people who take everything he says seriously”. Why on earth would anyone take one individual’s stance as gospel in this Information Age? There are so many views on offer that anyone just lazily relying on a single UA-cam channel for advice deserves what they get. That ain’t research. That’s faith.
True, but he's aware of that faith and he is abusing it Life is too busy to be constantly debunking everything you you listen to and the algorithm just pushes the same stuff at you to confirm your bias He knows that and he knows people just love a one stop shop advice from a nice attractive successful relatable guy And yet he does not take any responsibility
Can we not just leave him alone?
Or do we have very little to be getting on with
We could say the same. Mind your own if you dont want to be confronted with the reality.
Reality.. woke left need to waken up
Let’s all clap our hands for the brilliance of dr Andrew huberman
He loves his dogs
women not so much 😅
Its an extract from the cameron hanes podcast, posted waaaay before the ny piece, so saying it took him a month is fundamentally dishonest
I am a clinician and verify that his medical info is really useful and accurate. I personally am grateful. The issue of teachers being ethical goes back thousands of years... they often don't behave as ethically as we would like .on the other hand hes really a great person compare say to Biden
Watch until the end: Very spot on about how the more popular you become and the more money you make, the less authentic you many become. Grandiose psychopathy- exactly. Narcissism. Many UA-camrs and “Influencers” become that way. Cult-like followings form. I now spend less time consuming podcasts.
Curious to know what exactly he said about Keegan. Pretty sure he cheated on her too according To the comment section of the actual article.
I was an original Huberman fan. Now I’m not. You don’t get a pass to be a liar to people. Period.
You get it. It's troubling that many refuse to.
Cast the 1st stone... you know the rest.
@@robinjones916 🤡