David Starkey: Keir Starmer's plans for Constitutional Change
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
- Please join the David Starkey Members' Club via Patreon / davidstarkeytalks or Subscribestar www.subscribes...
Chris McAndrew, CC BY 3.0 creativecommon..., via Wikimedia Commons
Please do not re-upload any David Starkey Talks video without permission.
#Davidstarkey #Davidstarkeytalks #History
Please join the David Starkey Members' Club via Patreon www.patreon.com/davidstarkeytalks or Subscribestar www.subscribestar.com/david-starkey-talks
This is why I believe constitutional politics should be taught in school. _Not_ Party politics, but how the instructions of government work, what the traditions are and why they're important to the function of good governance. We've had Religious Education for decades, time for Political Education to be added to the curriculum.
There is a reason it isn't taught. The plan has been to dismantle Britain and The United States for decades. Britain first, then America.
Oh yeah I'm sure childless women teachers will absolutely not subvert those lessons and teach their own politics 😂
Under the Act of union we the people should be educated through our schools on the English Constitution and English Bill of Rights...Now ask yourself who voided the Act of union in 1965 by removing this part of the Act
Bloody marvellous idea, I don't know if you have seen the UA-cam video of two lawyers in front of a Parliamentary Select Committee schooling the MPs on how Parliament should function. It showed them up to be ill informed and ill educated on the running of Parliament
In addition, abolishing the treason laws and the death penalty was also a very big mistake, as this is how we are in our current situation - I absolutely believe in the immediate restoration of capital punishment, which needs to be extended to offences like sexual offences involving any child (under the age of 21) and of drug trafficking, drug dealing and drug smuggling, which must carry an automatic death penalty on conviction by a court - we also need to restore the legal age of consent and of majority back to 21 for everything, as part of a wider return to traditional values in every area of our society, as an immediate return to tradition is the only way out of our current situation
As an Irish Catholic Patriot living 21 years in the U.K., I agree with David’s comments, as I’ve witnessed what he refers to as being reality, both here in Manchester and in the U.K. generally - I see similar also happening in my native Republic of Ireland, where I have extended family in Rural Ireland - we have to learn the lessons from the mistakes of our past and we ignore the lessons of our history at our peril
This is a perennial problem it seems. Politicians can never admit to being wrong, let alone apologise for the disasters they cause and as ever, it's the little people that have to pick up the pieces. Cabinet ministers have been immune from prosecution for far too long.
*Protestants Out*
What's hard to understand?
most seem to be completely oblivious of the mistakes of the past
@@ryan.1990 England needs to return to the Catholic faith, the one true faith
@@michaeljohndennis2231you mean church of England that is the true Catholic faith. Read a good history book.
Making change irreversible is a true sign of a tyrant
Mr Starkey is so right,I find what he has to say,incredibly depressing
He's a mild Tory at best
Maybe, but better to have clarity and understanding of the problem in order provide an effective opposition
Keep on "telling things how they truly are" (educating the public) Mr Starkey. You certainly are a National Treasure. 🎖️🦉📖💡✨✨
Part of the problem is students are no longer given any real education on the English constitution. If you read figures from the past they often seemed to exhibit a knowledge and admiration for britains constitutional history; even to the point of being perhaps overly romantic about it. Now there is no knowledge, no respect and absolutely no romance for what came before. But there would be huge scope for a self consciously revolutionary party which backed genuine “conservatism” in the sense of resurrecting the Nation, it’s history & it’s people.
I went to School in the 70s and 80s, It was only until the days of the internet that I learnt we had a Bill of Rights.
That's a good point. It's likely on purpose, too. As the schools and universities are now controlled by acolytes of the woke religion, the kids are being indoctrinated, and the politicians are complicit. They couldn't stop it even if they wanted to, so enfeebled they've become to their Civil Servant & Quango masters.
@@lucidmoment71Having been educated in the same decades I suspect that you had poor teachers and that you were remarkably uncurious given that it took you from the 80s until the age of the internet to learn this.
They always tried to cover it up and deprive us of our rights 😮
@andythompson7456 wouldn't want a pint with you pal
As an American I would say that central to this is that you have introduced the two worst aspects of our system - an uncontrollable Civil Service and the Ascendancy of the Lawyers.
"Lawyers are the custodians of the arrangements which keep chaos at bay." --conservative commentator George Will.
Yup. Rule by bureaucrats and lawyers. Not the rule of law.
Its called tyranny. Period.
you said that like it meant anything.
@@raverdeath100 Try thinking about it.
Well said Sir, at last an Englishman with the conviction to see the wood for the trees and speak the blindingly obvious truth.
THIS is why the Left hates Starkey.
@@raypurchase801 Starkey's an irrelevance. He's howling in the wind to an ever shrinking group.
Genius.
Like a phoenix from the ashes, David Starkey rises again, free and more powerful than ever.
So true David, we have new Labour and blue Labour
Wonderfully expressed and alas, alas to the point and accurate.
Thank you, Dr. Starkey!
This needs to go viral. You couldn’t be more correct 👏
Some might say that parliament is not fit for purpose which is a reason why more beaurocracy has been created to cover for it while it wallows in idiocy and corruption.
Er, no. That's the point DS is trying to make. Parliament has been supplanted by rule by managerial technocrats. That was deliberate policy by the Blair Terror. he sought to totally undermine Parliament as it frustrated his ambitions. Remember, Blair and his cronies started out as Marxists. What's more, Parliament never ever was there to 'rule' us. The Crown rules. Parliament is the people's forum with the Crown - 'The Crown in Parliament'. And Parliament has a duel legitimacy. One it enables the Crown to raise taxes and two, for the benefit of the free self-sovereign citizen, it holds the executive to account.
Blair's actions corrupted Parliament.
I believe the reverse. It is the lack of a genuine parliament that is at the root of the problem. It is the constitutional erosion of the parliamentary system that allows people like Blair to thrive in the first place - not the other way round. That is why reclaiming national soverignty is the essential first step in putting things right.
@@kubhlaikhan2015 Exactly. And it is not a 'belief'. It is a fact. You and I are 'sovereign' in ourselves. Parliament is supposed to reflect that sovereignty. We - it and us, and The Crown - are subject to the law, which is common law. Parliament is empowered to make other laws - statutory law, rules really, with which we will generally agree to go along with, but which can be changed by successor parliaments. But The Common Law is immutable and eternal; its philosophy being discovered by legal argument creating precedent.
Starmer couldn't constitute a piss up in a brewery. The only thing starmers interested in is himself with added power and money .
And further ruining the Country into the bargain !
That is, a true Blairite then?
He's more of a curry and a pint, but during a work meeting. ?
So glad to hear some sense and understanding of our Constitution
Superbly put, Starkey as always hits the nail on the head.
Just delightfully insightful. ❤
Beware the Thane of Fife. Gordon Brown is a native of Fife so maybe Shakespeare was gifted when he issued that warning.
Mr Starkey is absolutely right. Quite brilliant analysis from a master.
It's OUR constitution not there's. THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO CHANGE IT without our permission.
They aren't changing it citizens have no right to the English law this is the biggest scam that people can't comprehend, the UK isn't a country it's a corporation.
My issue with the approach to the reformed House of Lords is it merely focuses on change, not whether the change itself is necessary or preferable.
One of their arguments, for instance, is that many members of the Lord's were unelected.
Not incompetent. Not inefficient. Just not subject to the same popularity votes that brought about Liz Truss or Joe Biden (because the public is so hard to sway, and always conducts research on their candidates based on informed decisions).
IMO one of its majour flaws is the unregulated power of the PM to appoint, well, anyone, without limit (think the Billionaire granted a peerage merely based on his monetary contributions to the conservative party).
Solution? Revoke or limit the number of appointments - leaving it primarily to the Independent Appointments Commission, approved by the King.
We need only glance at Senates across the developed world to understand that what we have is special. And at the very least, noble in professional approach.
We do not need a House of Commons for life. We need the House of Lords. Individuals of metritable backgrounds, of respectable history and standing. Informed in their approach and thorough in their decisions. As government should be by default.
Merely comparing debates from one chamber to the other weighs GREATLY in favour of the Upper House. Howcome? They don't act like children, alongside a myriad of other reasons.
"Scottish malice". This has been an abiding feature of our polity for decades, simply because Scotland sees itself as an underdog, even a victim, of England's dominance. In many ways, it's a very natural human thing. On a smaller scale, Wales' hostility towards England, as exemplified recently by the now crazed Michael Sheen, shares the same resentful roots. It accounts for the perpetual whingeing and whining that has been heard in the House of Commons for almost 300 years. And then devolution happened, and it got infinitely worse.
Hat's off to you. This post should be pinned!
To my friends across the ocean: You are a nation that has existed for over a millennium. You have beat back, absorbed, and fought off countless invasions. You are a small island state that conquered the world. You are my home country, my brothers and my sisters and I am worried for you. I fear, just like us (US), you are being brought down from within. So I just wanted to remind you that England, Scotland, & Ireland, that belongs to you! Not the elitist politicians or even your monarch and if you are united together, they have no chance. They know the only way to defeat us is divide us. I've always seen our 2 nations as sister nations, sharing values and doctoring and it falls to our generation to beat back this plague of lawlessness, wokeness, and assault on our values and we can do it together. We owe that to our ancestors but more importantly, to our CHILDREN! Be strong and God Save the King! And God bless America!
The last 2 years have been the call to arms for all patriots across the world, we are all United now thanks to their deranged overreach 🤝
I heard yesterday that Donald Trump follows exactly the Hitler scenario and now signals the army to rally behind him. Aren't you more worried about that ?
How about the US being the home country of native Americans and how about sharing their values ? Your post puzzles me greatly.
We need a full dedicated English Parliament
No point unless we also have full English Independence and press the reset button an English Parliament within the UK is a waste of time.
More MPs? No thank you.
An end to devolved MPs voting in WM on English only laws - yes please!
@richardlloyd2589 there won't be more MPs but less, less burocracy, no need for regions and mayor's plus an end to the house of Lords can be achieved.
Gordon Brown was also responsible for these Muslim rape gangs, escaping justice for years as he knew about it and instructed the police not to intervene it’s the lifestyle he said is not forgets he was talking about young children. In my opinion he should be arrested in charge and every senior police officer that went along with it should be sacked and have their pensions removed.
It was covered up for years because New Labour thought it racist to critics it.
Gordon Brown was not responsible for these Muslim rape gangs. They are everywhere in Europe. We call them lover boys. It is a clash of cultures, that needs time and awareness to resolve itself. Like educating children on the aspects of narcissism.
Perhaps you mean to say how Gordon Brown dealt with it ? Grooming is a psychological problem. Politicians can hardly interfere, only indirectly by funding the organisations that are able to something about it. The police can't stop it.
What is the use of arresting and sacking everyone anyway ? Ever thought about the costs ?
What a disgusting, slanderous lie. Gordon Brown had nothing to do with this.
Liberal government was meant to be limited government. Tony Blair was the greatest disaster to hit British politics. Blairite institutions gives two choices: totalitarian government or ineffective government. Britain was built on slow, continuous reform - always being dragged into a new era. Blair did a century of reform in a decade and our politicians and bureaucrats are not up to the task of Cool Britannia.
I wish everyone would just spoil their ballot at every election.
I think it'll be a record low turn out, especially in places like the red wall. Why bother voting at all? Nothing's allowed to change. That will suit the elites just fine. They'll commission new reports and pay more officials to do it.
Always remember that Johnson was too weak to implement any of the many reports commissioned just after the 2029 election. Just remember he kicked Article 16 into the long grass (which led to WF and de facto dynamic alignment with Brussels) and told Frost his excellent plan for efficiently ridding ourselves of stifling and absurd EU regs couldn't be done as all Parliamentary time had been allocated to Net Zero.
Vote Reform.
No. Vote Reform UK.
Just don't vote. Whats the point of wasting your time to spoil a ballot?
No.
But 650 new MPs would send a message.
Should have happened after the previous MP expenses scandal.
"Profound malfunction...". Now THAT is a descriptor that rings true.
I would very much like the single transferable vote. I would vote 1. Reform. 2. SDP. 3...and reluctantly Conservative. Better parties can not come through if we think our Vote might be wasted.
Thank you
The June 2023 bill that destroyed EU law is a terrifying result of our parliament lacking checks and balances, there is a constitutional emergency and thank you for sharing your thoughts and opinions, you are much appreciated
EU law should be destroyed. It has no place in UK law.
No, we have checks and balances that are unnecessary (the supreme court that can stop the actions of elected governments? Really?) and biased towards checking the actions of one party and not another. We should wind back the supreme court, mayors, devolved parliaments, etc and get back to the more simple system: Voters elect government to enact legislation and policies -> government enacts legislation and policies -> if it goes wrong, the voters elect someone else next time. "Court says no" is ridiculous and quite unnecessary.
Blair is a constitutional wrecker. He studied law. The committees that stand above parliament, backed up by his Supreme court, need to be dismantled. Blair should be deported to North Korea. So should Kier Starmer. In the 90s, we could not stop Blair because he had a Commons majority of 179 seats.
So should the whole corrupt anti democratic Tory party. We need a new written constitution and a truely independent and democratic oversight of parliament with jail for corrupt or 'treasonous' politicians.
I agree with everything except Blair. He should be sent to Iraq for trial.
The basic of the constitution, magna carter and common law should be taught in school, once people realise they have power by standing together, GOVERNMENT, PARLIAMENT AND HOUSE OF LORDS WOULD STEP BACK FROM THE LINES THEY ARE CROSSING
It's exactly for that reason that such subjects are not taught in schools. And folks these days are so mollycoddled by their addition to their smart phones and technology in general, that they've lost the instinct to stand up and fight for their rights, which are, by the way, being continually eroded in one way or another, on an almost daily basis. Mr Starkey is indeed correct when he says that when it is clear a system isn't working, the modern day answer is simply to create yet a other layer of unwanted, and ineffective bureauocracy, to cover it up, hence the ever increasing number of Civil Servants, in Whitehall.
Quite simply, the UK, is doomed. The War Criminal, Tony Blair saw to that, aided and abbetted latterly, by Gordon Brown, that master of sheer chutzpah and charisma.....
This might be a stupid remark, but I'll take the risk. Listening to David I learn a lot about England and its complexity of government. Here in The Netherlands we had several decades without any government and it does not seem to make a difference. No one here talks about 'power' , we talk about the majority. In our country we seem to all have an absolute opinion on absolutely everything and most votes count. Rather prozaic really. So, sometimes it feels to me like the English live in some kind of epic story with kings and heros and villains and grails and swords. Some magical higher purpose than just regulating daily things..... Sorry if it does not make sense.
Hence Shakespeare was not Dutch 😂❤
Hahaha That's absolutely true !
We had Erasmus and Hieronymus Bosch . @@theartfuldodger8609
Brilliant David.
David Starkey is a national treasure!
His views and opinions are so knowledgeable and factual, many people should absorb his insights in the political world.
It's true, the UK is failing England in a big way, only dedicated MPS can make it work. But we do need our own parliament and recognition back.
Starmer is a less competent and uncharismatic version of Blair.
I have refused to register to vote if enough people do that then the government will make it a criminal offence not to vote or they will lower the voting age to 16
If enough people do that the Mob will vote itself in, form the government, and cancel all voting. A bit of math and logic is never waisted.
If you want a change you grow up and make your voice heard in politics.
Starmer is a danger to the future of the people of Britain 🚩🚩👍
We all know he is controlled by Blair. Why oh why are people listening to the madman.
Robertgreen at long last someone agrees with me
VOTE REFORM UK 🇬🇧
Why exactly?
@@normandunford5747 Tice and even Farage won’t speak about the English Constitution and likely both believe that Parliament is sovereign, when it absolutely is not.
Starmer doesn't plan for anything except what good for him. He gets his script through his handlers, ultimately from The City of London.
No Starmers script is a joint production between Marxist rhetoric (including the pursuance of Globalism) and the unashamaded promotion of all things Islamic - which merely reinforces the demise of the main tenet of democracy where power is rooted and contained within the individual, rather than what now pertains, that group ideologies weild disproportionate levels of power
All their talk and zero change to immigration. I'm simply not interested in MPs lies.
Starmer has gone mad with power, before actually getting into power.
I reckon Northern Ireland will leave the UK and avoid joining the corrupt RoI, instead opting for independent dominion status.
Scotland will need another racket to live off, maybe Berlin needs a new lander, before they also run out of money.
well a issue created by brexit not starmer.
Starmer linked to Tri-Lateral Commission. Also all documentation with respect to his US visits relating to Assange extradition have vanished.
UK by now has the very same uniparty problem like the US.
God help us when our only choices are the Tories and the labour party.
I love this Englishman.
We have the power don't vote Labour,vote reform.
"Irreversible" changes made y one political party is not how it's done in this country - irreversible are the those changes that were made with the Bill of Rights, where liberties of the subjects have been confirmed and it is explicitly stated that parliament can do nothing to the detriment of the people. Government is an agent of parliament. the servant cannot control the master.
Starmer is Blair Mk2
He says the referendum for voter system reform was for STV. It wasn't - it was for AV.
He's going to weaken the second chamber on normal legeslation and create absolute power for himself on those issues (no more delays or amendments on legeslation). Can't wait for someone smarter to work out how to use it.
With bills being passed without amendment or second thought legeslation will be so much worse as Lords amendments are overwhelmingly accepted by the government now because they fix problems.
That's one of the worst parts of Brown's planned butchery.
TY DS
Our current government and previous are all administrators, no one knows how to govern, mainly due to EU rule etc. Everything is badly managed in the UK schools, NHS, Police, manufacturing etc etc etc
so rings true...gordon brown as economic stakhanovite and i thought gove would be like this as soon as he started going on about smokey chimneys in wales, now he has stiched up the leaseholders with zero consequences fees we have virtually gone back to the era of enclosure and landless tenants on that one, how to monetize stupidity and fear
One of the conundrums of UK Governance is that has structures have grown, less seems to work along the post-war consensus that saw society tick over incrementally from the 50s.
in 2000 councils were changed into enabling authorities, which also saw the end of municipal housing, so valued since the 1930s. When George Osborne created another tier in local government, metro mayors, who have been given huge government funding. This saw council structures created in 1972, to sail along with the other layers of governance
Anyone who talks about Tax Cuts, appear oblivious to how spending has ballooned during the past two decades
Any constitutional change Must be put to the public and voted for possibly by a referendum, why because politicians are not known for getting important things right.
Imagine a coalition govt. of you David & Nick Griffin, just 6months and this hellhole would be over!
☝🥺👍
Starmer was in cahoots with Jimmy Savile.
I am left wondering how far statutory regulators permeate change in UK society. I parked my vehicle to work on a vicar’s house. I arrived at 3.30pm and the parking charges ran to 8pm. I scratched out the date on the parking voucher with other details and forgot to write in my car registration details. I was later in the day given a parking ticket and I appealed with a letter from the vicar stating the time I had arrived, that he had given me the voucher, and, that I left after 8pm. The point being that there was no scam of using one one voucher for more than one vehicle. Furthermore I had never had any parking or driving offence against me.
My appeal was denied and I was amazed and confounded by the intolerance exhibited through the decision where regulations were applied seemingly without remorse. When I grew up there was a level of tolerance but not now. Regulations seem to be the growing measure of a person and regulations are the stick to beat a person with. The political parties champion their own party but who is championing decent people wanting to live in the old Conservative and old Labour world of values within a tolerant society run for all of the people?
Gordon brown was during his time the worst PM since blair.
Starmer will just carry on with Blairism - which caused a very radical change to the UK's constitution.
We need one strong political leader and a party that is anti Blair and anti new Labour. With an iron will we can roll back these changes.
Oh that dear, dear man Starkey. He's right on this, as he is so right on so many subjects. Alas, alas, he is pissing into the wind. The 5% of the voting public who understand what you are saying, David, already agree with you. And we despair as the destructive few heap destruction upon the many. With such a fundamentally stupid, uneducated electorate, the is no defence. We may all weep, as our country is dismantled by the long march.
Beaurocrats want to run the Country, Lawyers want to write more Laws and Legislation so they stay relevant,so they are indispensable.We can do without both.
Very important video
No government is bound by the previous, so what Keir does can be reversed
However the Tories did not reverse the new labour damage
With all the id cards surveillance and other identity confirmations why do people have to be registered for council tax in order to vote?
Seems to me that our Parliament is run more and more by outside forces! The World Economic Forum comes to mind...
And Johnson signed the UK to WHO in any sign of a pandemic or slight cold THEY are in charge of the UK's lockdowns! 🤬🤬🤬
It makes sense to have a strong WRITTEN consitution. Sure when the goverment and monarch are sensible it works as is. But you have seen a few ... not so sober PMs the last few years.
The annoying tries to round the parlament (on Brexit agreemnets, on covid etc) should be taken seriously. You might get a sour goverment and end up deadlocked.
Look at local politics where different parties have to co-operate and where one goes for pragmatic sollutions not only politcal spinn. Today the UK are a warning to fellow democracies, no ideal long since. The two party imaginary war (also in teh USa due to a two party systemthere) makes everybody into an idiot mainly trying to hate an dblame "the other side/party". Brings out the worst :(
Lovely wooden chair chuckle, great to see
'There is a memory to defend'. It is a recorded memory, which future generations may find again.
That's an excellent suggestion, Saladin, but where are the qualified teachers to be found?
There’s an *essence* to defend, a spark from which new life can spring.
Truly disturbing to think the next labour in May '24 will sweep into power with no economic flexibilty, so all their energies will go into endless woke policies; dealing with 'injustices', 'inequalities' and Green Zealotry. The madness will step up to a whole new level and most tragic of all we'll vote for them in our millions so deserve the national self flagellation just waiting to take power.
That all sounds better than what we have atm
On a seperate note - the parliament of just 30 odd years ago was inclusive of genuine and sincere people in that a relationship existed between people and their MP from blue collar industry - by way of trade unions.
My point is that regardless of whether trade unions are essential or not, some trust of some kind or affinity existed.
Now, you have a sense that all of parliament is owned and operated by another affinity that is clearly to meaningful extent capitalist.
Therefore, you clearly are entitled to slate Brown, and i have not heard of his proposals, let alone read them, yet, i recognise Brown as humane and genuine in the sense that he is not a man consumed by money or being president of the EU and more the right sort of person in the wrong sort of administration insofar as New Labour was about distortion fundamentally and i think Brown would have been more conducive to John Smith being PM.
Also, it is to your point on the burearucracy that sees perpetual consultancy - the cycle that creates an unsafe NHS and i think all the tax credits and welfare introductions largely under Brown probably could and should be replaced with Prifessor Guy Standings model and just off the top of my head - a job recently advertised for a postman or woman with Royal Mail for 30 hours contract over 6 days i think.
The wages were around £14 hour and other jobs in supermarkets offer a range of hours from 10 week to maybe 35 hours and all on £12 hour or so.
My point is these basic jobs are not presented to unemploted jobseekers at the job centre - in fact they are advertised by 'third parties' that see applications not responded to and my question is why are basic jobs such as i describe being managed by obscure entities when people at job centres get offered courses that lead to nothing?
Therefore, regardless of Browns imperfections - he is marginally more credible than most and massively more humane than many and i think his wife is attractive and i think nobody has even heard of Osborne or Cameron who are existing with nothing but money and status and lust for more kudos within their social set and i think Tony Benn is missed greatly and Edwina Currie and John Redwood is coherent even if you dusagree with him and you use the word disenchantment and i will use the word apathy - i think possibly Poland had 73% turnout recently or 83% and apparently it was 40% odd before that and i sense peacefully Ghandi may come back en vogue as people at first reject an insurrection and so Sunak may have 100 million or something family fortune and maybe more and does that matter?
Yes, because it follows that i then ask - why is a man with hundreds of millions interested in running the country full of peasants?
And so there are no policemen or firemen or army or fa tory or unemployed or carers or anyone in positions of power and influence because Orwell told us - to paraphrase in his literature - 'it did not escaoe my attention - anyone in government or influencial position with a brain is deemed a problem' - he expressed that in his literature, that sentiment is true and the country is histile to NHS and police whistleblowers and journalists and it is one or the other - either we are humane or we are all self-interested hypocrites out for another few grand oay rise and promotion.
When we are told the 'system' is defunct - that can only mean people are in the system that actively enforce such or are ignorant of being used by those in the clique and that is where to my mind women and people of colour more so have been severely manipulated to keep the system in tack and it is crumbling as you cite rightly.
ABSOLUTELY NONE of us were taught any of this at school which is disgraceful.
The Re-Launched SDP & Reform UK would fight it :)
Have we not seen enough changes to make it better, so far it's easy to make new laws, that not one is good for the public.
Come on there are loads of tom highams and Jorge mosses in the UK and have faith in the system , which obviously must be justified
Nevermind maybe it has to get worse before it gets better
Removing power abuse from the likes of Truss, BoJo and ReesMogg doesn't appear too bad an idea.
No matter how bad the Tories get, and they are absolutely awful, I still thank God that Labour is not in power. That is how bad things are now in our country,.
they will be next year, the irony of blaming politicians for the mess who the public actually ended up voting in by the people who complain, you cannot make it up
Stammer is a spent force the law enforcement officer for cherry and phoney Blair !
Failures of Socialism has always explained with “we don't have enough Socialism”
I was under the impression that it was illegal to vote for any law that could not be immediately repealed by the next parliament.
It's the end of the Monarchy.
We have a Uniparty by design. You cannot get any substantive change and that is by design. new Online Bill contracted out to Ofcom for example. Its a Technocratic system, which is also why they love they EU so much.
THE LABOUR PARTY MUST BE STOPPED....THINK !
DS can be so endearing when he steps out of his impressive history knowledge. Dear David, the wood of your chair is part of the normal carbon balance on the surface of this planet. The problem lies in the enormous amount of carbon dug out from under the surface and thrown into the mix. Loads of carbon normally stored and locked up in nature is freed and turned into gasses in an alarming rate, ever since the invention of machines that run on burning wood, peat, coal, petrol, gaz. Decarbonisation means generating energy from other sources than carbon, to make engines run. The amount of carbon released in the atmosphere because of our use of engines, is threatening conditions that enable life on earth. Just 2 degrees temperature rise of the ocean and gone is all the coral reef together with every form of life depending on it.
It is not your chair.
"Why doubling .. number of civil servants?" .. better: Why are old far$t lords numbers doubled? Why not sack them all and save 300 GBP per old far$t per day plus his bar tab in the HoL bar?
New new new labour new danger
Labour's traditional left were always constitutionally conservative on most things because an effective centralised state is something they wanted to use for their own ends. This was always inevitable after Corbyn and co being purged.
To retain the HOL is obscene
STARKERS! STARKERS! STARKERS! Yer man talkin shoit again! But he's funny, hilarious. In the way Sidney Greenstreet is funny in The Maltese Falcon. "well, if you lose a son, its possible to get another. There's only one STARKERSSSSS" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
New labour 2, will be just as bad for the UK as new labour 1.
The New Tory’s Cameron & Osborne destroyed the Conservatives. You 😢 almost need a 20-25 yr long march to return to what worked.
I’m an American. Any good accessible book on the UK Constitutions evolution tied to Parliament’s rise?
Those beady rat like eyes staring at us on the photo ,,,scary
Never vote for the useless labour party again in my life time.