Відео

@iggyantioch *Yes RCs love misquoting Mal **1:11**.* 1. Mal 1:1-10 all referred to Israel and temple. Not Church. 2. Mal 1: 6-14 says OT priests. Not RC priests. 3. Mal 1:11 - most important point. the offering was not "blood sacrifice" that RCs claimed to be. Knowing the Hebrew word it uses says it refers to "meal offering". Not "blood sacrifice". There are at least 8 words used for sacrifice and offerings in Hebrew OT. The Hebrew word used in Mal 1:11 for offering was minchah referring to grain or meal offering like the one offered by Cain in Gen 4:3. minchah refers to bloodless offerings like grain, fruits, gift, meat, .. . Not as RCs falsely claimed - blood sacrifice of Jesus. H4503 (Strong) מִנְחָה minchâh min-khaw' For H3588  from the rising H4480 H4217  of the sun H8121  even unto H5704  the going down H3996  of the same my name H8034  shall be great H1419  among the Gentiles; H1471  and in every H3605  place H4725  incense H6999  shall be offered H5066  unto my name, H8034  and a pure H2889  *offering: H4503 * for H3588  my name H8034  shall be great H1419  among the heathen, H1471  saith H559  the LORD H3068  of hosts. H6635  you said Malachi 1:11 - this is a prophecy of a pure offering that will be offered in every place from the rising of the sun to its setting. Thus, there will be only one sacrifice, but it will be offered in many places around the world. This prophecy is fulfilled only by the Catholic Church in the Masses around the world, where the sacrifice of Christ which transcends time and space is offered for our salvation. If this prophecy is not fulfilled by the Catholic Church, then Malachi is a false prophet.

In Christian Eastern Rome and later Byzantine, heretics were brutally persecuted and sometimes killed en masse much earlier than in the Western Roman Church! In the western Roman Empire, almost only Christians were initially victims of persecution. Since Christianity was misused as an instrument of political power by the emperor and the clergy to create the internal unity of the great empires, heretics were treated like enemies of the state and traitors to the state. Conversely, many heretical groups were also subersive politically active or collaborated with hostile foreign powers. In the early modern period (from 1500 AD), i.e. since the Reformation, the Anabaptist sect was persecuted by all denominations in half of Europe and tortured or killed en masse - almost worse and more extensive than what happened in the medieval progroms against Jews! Both Luther and Zwingli (Switzerland) as well as the Catholic Church called for their expulsion and elimination. Such persecutions for religious and political reasons already existed in ancient Mesopotamia/Babylonia, in the Levant, Judaism and Ancient Egypt as well as in the Roman Empire. Nowadays this is almost only practiced in a few Islamic states, mostly for the same political-religious reasons. The reinterpretation of the early Christian Lord's Supper as a "bloodless" sacrificial cult including the "cannibalistic" incorporation of Jesus ("real presence") during the magical transformation of bread and wine was only dogmatically formulated by the medieval scholastics (Thomas Aquinas and others). Greek philosophers in particular were used for their subtle dogma theories, but influences from ancient and medieval alchemy concepts may also have played a role (ultimately going back to Hermes Trismegistus and ancient Egyptian/Hellenistic Gnostic-occult mysteries!) A First Supper quarrel is known from the 3rd/4th century (Wiki). Augustine represented a symbolic-spiritual interpretation of Jesus' last speech, his opponent Ambrose (Milan) understood it literally, and in the end he was able to prevail with his opinion. But very early on, there was a mixture with pagan sacrificial and mystery cults in the Hellenistic mediterranean area, and probably also with primitive ideas about cannibalistic "eating of the gods" in order to absorb their power and spirituality. In any case, such ideas and practices came into the early Christian communities from the pagan environment, not from the Jewish Christians. However, when it comes to a professional priestly caste, temples/churches and cultic rites, the influence of Jewish Christians certainly played a significant role; the synagogue became a model of Christian churchhood. But the Roman Empire also put pressure on the Christian sects to present themselves to the outside world as a “temple community” and to give up their “subversive” underground existence. No religion was accepted without temples and temple worship! It was only under Charlemagne (800) that the mass was transformed into a pompous, courtly, theatrical show Eucharist, with priests/bishops acting like sacred "pop stars". The congregation was separated from the altar area and became passive spectators of the spectacle, as is still the case today at the Vatican's major masses on the most important holidays.

@iggyantioch *Lol. More misquoting of Scriptures. 2 Chro 26 is Old Covenant. Heb 7,9,10 says altars, sacrifices and clergy priesthood was already obsolete in New Covenant. So what "priesthood" are you referring to?* *We do not see Apostles sacrificing/offering Jesus on any altars or Roman altars during communion. They merely prayed, broke bread and passed the bread around table in the house Church. No Roman priests. No Roman altars. No Roman sacrificing Jesus. No Roman Mass. Not weird costumes. Not weird hats.* 2Ch 26:18 And they withstood King Uzziah, and said to him, "It is not for you, Uzziah, to burn incense to the LORD, but for the priests, the sons of Aaron, who are consecrated to burn incense. Get out of the sanctuary, for you have trespassed! You shall have no honor from the LORD God." you said 2 Chron. 26:18 - only validly consecrated priests will be able to offer the sacrifice to God. The Catholic priests of the New Covenant trace their sacrificial priesthood to Christ.

@iggyantioch *More misquoting of Scriptures.* 1. Vs 14 - clearly refers to Coming of the Lord during Judgement Day. It says "seen over them" - referring to Jesus Coming in the sky. And His arrow (referring to Judgement) going forth. Clearly referring to Judgment Day. AndLuke 17:24 describes the same "lightning" during Judgement Day. And "blowing of trumpet (happening during Judgement Day). We can see that blowing of trumpet in the Book of Joel referring to Judgement Day). 2. Vs 15 - The Lord of host defend believers. We do not see that 2000 years ago. So it's referring to 2nd Coming. 3. Vs 16 - the term "in that day" has most often in Scriptures referred to 2nd Coming or Judgement Day. *Totally not what RCs misquoted* The Lord Will Save His People Zec 9:14 Then the LORD will be seen over them, And His arrow will go forth like lightning. The Lord GOD will blow the trumpet, And go with whirlwinds from the south. Zec 9:15 The LORD of hosts will defend them; They shall devour and subdue with slingstones. They shall drink and roar as if with wine; They shall be filled with blood like basins, Like the corners of the altar. Zec 9:16 The LORD their God will save them in that day, As the flock of His people. For they shall be like the jewels of a crown, Lifted like a banner over His land- The Day of the Lord Jol 2:1 📝 Blow the trumpet in Zion, And sound an alarm in My holy mountain! Let all the inhabitants of the land tremble; For the day of the LORD is coming, For it is at hand: Luk 17:24 For as the lightning that flashes out of one part under heaven shines to the other part under heaven, so also the Son of Man will be in His day. ~~~` *Zec 9:9-13 refers to 1st Coming of Jesus.* *Zec **9:14** onwards refers to 2nd Coming of Jesus.* The Coming King of Zion Zec 9:9 📝 "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your King is coming to you; He is just and having salvation, Lowly and riding on a donkey, A colt, the foal of a donkey. you said Zech. 9:15-16 - this is a prophecy that the sons of Zion, which is the site of the establishment of the Eucharistic sacrifice, shall drink blood like wine and be saved. This prophecy is fulfilled only by the priests of the Catholic Church.

@iggyantioch *RCs love demonstrating misquoting Scriptures. Lol.* 1. Vs 14 - clearly says it's the house of Israel and Judah. Not Christian Church. 2. Vs 15 - Jesus hadn't executed any judgement yet 2000 years ago. That judgement comes during Judgement Day in End Times. So why would it refer to Roman religion? Lol. 3. Vs 16 - says it's Judah, Jerusalem. Not Christian Church. 4. Vs 17 - clearly says it refers to King David and Israel. Not Christian Church. 5. Vs 18 - Heb 7,9,10 clearly says OT sacrifices, altars and clergy priesthood were already obsolete in New Covenant. So Vs 18 clearly does not mean Christian Church. But Old Covenant. 6. Vs 20 - clearly says it refers to Old Covenant. Israel broke the covenant with God. The Lord's Eternal Covenant with David Jer 33:14 'Behold, the days are coming,' says the LORD, 'that I will perform that good thing which I have promised to the house of Israel and to the house of Judah: Jer 33:15 'In those days and at that time I will cause to grow up to David A Branch of righteousness; He shall execute judgment and righteousness in the earth. Jer 33:16 In those days Judah will be saved, And Jerusalem will dwell safely. And this is the name by which she will be called: THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.' Jer 33:17 "For thus says the LORD: 'David shall never lack a man to sit on the throne of the house of Israel; Jer 33:18 nor shall the priests, the Levites, lack a man to offer burnt offerings before Me, to kindle grain offerings, and to sacrifice continually.' " Jer 33:19 And the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah, saying, Jer 33:20 "Thus says the LORD: 'If you can break My covenant with the day and My covenant with the night, so that there will not be day and night in their season you said Jer. 33:18 - God promises that His earthly kingdom will consist of a sacrificial priesthood forever. This promise has been fulfilled by the priests of the Catholic Church, who sacramentally offer the sacrifice of Christ from the rising of the sun to its setting in every Mass around the world.

Calvinism=Satanism

But why is it called mystery Babylon??? Im sorry, but i just don't believe it's Babylon. It's a city/country that is like Babylon of the past. I always thought it was America . Especially how wicked we have become andvwill grow worse 😢

So if one does not agree with him, they are teerorists? Really? Is that mature or one demanding everyone only veiw things his way or they are satanic. The problem with this antiquated thinking in the days Daniel predicted when knowledge increases, is he makes himself obsolete. He is not keeping up and throws darts at those who are trying. For instance, there is not a single scripture in context that ever says once saved always saved which is ridiculous as he defies free will in igorance. That cannot be. When he rails against the Sabbath as an absolute apostate who does not even know how to read. There are 1,000 scriptures including many in the NT such as Heb. 4 which this guy has never truly read. This us why Paul tells us to prove all things gold fast that which is good. 1 Th. 5:21. Imagine his saying angels were demon possessed when demons originate from their children which is veey backwards. Imagine his saying the strange flesh was homosexuality in Sodom when it was angel flesh they wantes ro bring the return of the antediluvian Nephilim titans. This tradition is the defection as it is uneducated. In this sermon he violated his own 3 principles of an apostate and worse, he doesnt even know it. Sad.

John 6:51-52- then Jesus says that the bread He is referring to is His flesh. The Jews take Him literally and immediately question such a teaching. How can this man give us His flesh to eat? John 6:53 - 58 - Jesus does not correct their literal interpretation. Instead, Jesus eliminates any metaphorical interpretations by swearing an oath and being even more literal about eating His flesh. In fact, Jesus says four times we must eat His flesh and drink His blood. Catholics thus believe that Jesus makes present His body and blood in the sacrifice of the Mass. Protestants, if they are not going to become Catholic, can only argue that Jesus was somehow speaking symbolically. John 6:23-53 - however, a symbolic interpretation is not plausible. Throughout these verses, the Greek text uses the word “phago” nine times. “Phago” literally means “to eat” or “physically consume.” Like the Protestants of our day, the disciples take issue with Jesus’ literal usage of “eat.” So Jesus does what? John 6:54, 56, 57, 58 - He uses an even more literal verb, translated as “trogo,” which means to gnaw or chew or crunch. He increases the literalness and drives his message home. Jesus will literally give us His flesh and blood to eat. The word “trogo” is only used two other times in the New Testament (in Matt. 24:38 and John 13:18) and it always means to literally gnaw or chew meat. While “phago” might also have a spiritual application, “trogo” is never used metaphorically in Greek. So Protestants cannot find one verse in Scripture where “trogo” is used symbolically, and yet this must be their argument if they are going to deny the Catholic understanding of Jesus’ words. Moreover, the Jews already knew Jesus was speaking literally even before Jesus used the word “trogo” when they said “How can this man give us His flesh to eat?” (John 6:52). John 6:55 - to clarify further, Jesus says “For My Flesh is food indeed, and My Blood is drink indeed.” This phrase can only be understood as being responsive to those who do not believe that Jesus’ flesh is food indeed, and His blood is drink indeed. Further, Jesus uses the word which is translated as “sarx.” “Sarx” means flesh (not “soma” which means body). See, for example, John 1:13,14; 3:6; 8:15; 17:2; Matt. 16:17; 19:5; 24:22; 26:41; Mark 10:8; 13:20; 14:38; and Luke 3:6; 24:39 which provides other examples in Scripture where “sarx” means flesh. It is always literal. John 6:55 - further, the phrases “real” food and “real” drink use the word “alethes.” “Alethes” means “really” or “truly,” and would only be used if there were doubts concerning the reality of Jesus’ flesh and blood as being food and drink. Thus, Jesus is emphasizing the miracle of His body and blood being actual food and drink.

Jesus Promises His Real Presence in the Eucharist John 6:4,11-14 - on the eve of the Passover, Jesus performs the miracle of multiplying the loaves. This was prophesied in the Old Testament (e.g., 2 Kings4:43), and foreshadows the infinite heavenly bread which is Him. Matt. 14:19, 15:36; Mark 6:41, 8:6; Luke 9:16 - these passages are additional accounts of the multiplication miracles. This points to the Eucharist. Matt. 16:12 - in this verse, Jesus explains His metaphorical use of the term “bread.” In John 6, He eliminates any metaphorical possibilities. John 6:4 - Jesus is in Capernaum on the eve of Passover, and the lambs are gathered to be slaughtered and eaten. Look what He says. John 6:35,41,48,51 - Jesus says four times “I AM the bread from heaven.” It is He, Himself, the eternal bread from heaven. John 6:27,31,49 - there is a parallel between the manna in the desert which was physically consumed, and this “new” bread which must be consumed

those things with which atonement was made. Jesus is the true Lamb of atonement and must now be eaten. Lev. 7:15 - the Aaronic sacrifices absolutely had to be eaten in order to restore communion with God. These sacrifices all foreshadow the one eternal sacrifice which must also be eaten to restore communion with God. This is the Eucharist (from the Greek word “eukaristia” which means “thanksgiving”). Lev. 17:11,14 - in the Old Testament, we see that the life of the flesh is the blood which could never be drunk. In the New Testament, Jesus Christ’s blood is the source of new life, and now must be drunk. Gen. 9:4-5; Deut.12:16,23-24 - in these verses we see other prohibitions on drinking blood, yet Jesus commands us to drink His blood because it is the true source of life. 2 Kings 4:43 - this passage foreshadows the multiplication of the loaves and the true bread from heaven which is Jesus Christ. 2 Chron. 30:15-17; 35:1,6,11,13; Ezra 6:20-21; Ezek. 6:20-21- the lamb was killed, roasted and eaten to atone for sin and restore communion with God. This foreshadows the true Lamb of God who was sacrificed for our sin and who must now be consumed for our salvation. Neh. 9:15 - God gave the Israelites bread from heaven for their hunger, which foreshadows the true heavenly bread who is Jesus. Psalm 78:24-25; 105:40 - the raining of manna and the bread from angels foreshadows the true bread from heaven, Jesus Christ. Isaiah 53:7 - this verse foreshadows the true Lamb of God who was slain for our sins and who must be consumed. Wis. 16:20 - this foreshadows the true bread from heaven which will be suited to every taste. All will be welcome to partake of this heavenly bread, which is Jesus Christ. Sir. 24:21 - God says those who eat Him will hunger for more, and those who drink Him will thirst for more. Ezek. 2:8-10; 3:1-3 - God orders Ezekiel to open his mouth and eat the scroll which is the Word of God. This foreshadows the true Word of God, Jesus Christ, who must be consumed.

Jer. 33:18 - God promises that His earthly kingdom will consist of a sacrificial priesthood forever. This promise has been fulfilled by the priests of the Catholic Church, who sacramentally offer the sacrifice of Christ from the rising of the sun to its setting in every Mass around the world. Zech. 9:15-16 - this is a prophecy that the sons of Zion, which is the site of the establishment of the Eucharistic sacrifice, shall drink blood like wine and be saved. This prophecy is fulfilled only by the priests of the Catholic Church. 2 Chron. 26:18 - only validly consecrated priests will be able to offer the sacrifice to God. The Catholic priests of the New Covenant trace their sacrificial priesthood to Christ.

Old Testament (a). Foreshadowing of the Eucharistic Sacrifice Gen. 14:18 - this is the first time that the word “priest” is used in Old Testament. Melchizedek is both a priest and a king and he offers a bread and wine sacrifice to God. Psalm 76:2 - Melchizedek is the king of Salem. Salem is the future Jeru-salem where Jesus, the eternal priest and king, established his new Kingdom and the Eucharistic sacrifice which He offered under the appearance of bread and wine.. Psalm 110:4 - this is the prophecy that Jesus will be the eternal priest and king in the same manner as this mysterious priest Melchizedek. This prophecy requires us to look for an eternal bread and wine sacrifice in the future. This prophecy is fulfilled only by the Eucharistic sacrifice of the Catholic Church. Malachi 1:11 - this is a prophecy of a pure offering that will be offered in every place from the rising of the sun to its setting. Thus, there will be only one sacrifice, but it will be offered in many places around the world. This prophecy is fulfilled only by the Catholic Church in the Masses around the world, where the sacrifice of Christ which transcends time and space is offered for our salvation. If this prophecy is not fulfilled by the Catholic Church, then Malachi is a false prophet. Exodus 12:14,17,24; cf. 24:8 - we see that the feast of the paschal lamb is a perpetual ordinance. It lasts forever. But it had not yet been fulfilled. Exodus 29:38-39 - God commands the Israelites to “offer” (poieseis) the lambs upon the altar. The word “offer” is the same verb Jesus would use to institute the Eucharistic offering of Himself. Lev. 19:22 - the priests of the old covenant would make atonement for sins with the guilt offering of an animal which had to be consumed. Jesus, the High Priest of the New Covenant, has atoned for our sins by His one sacrifice, and He also must be consumed.

You can do all things trew Christ Jesus WHO strengths me 🙏

Calvinism is of the satani. Disgusting theology/ religion created by usurping scriptures to form its own deity, which does resemble Satan and Allah.

If you dont believe EVERY SINGLE WORD that proceeds from the mouth of God, i.e. flatearth, sorcery, demons, giants and etc, then you have already apostasized.

How many Christians were killed by the pope when they disagreed with the pope? How can you call anyone Holy Father besides Jesus? There are so many blasphemies committed by Catholics. Why have SO MANY CHILDREN BEEN KILLED AND RAPED BY PRIESTS AND NUNS? You Catholics have some nerve calling us Christians out. In the Tribulation, the Roman Catholic Church will be the NEW BABYLON. But HOW COULD YOU KNOW? I have been in several Catholic Churches, NOT ONE PERSON HAD A BIBLE, A KING JAMES BIBLE WITH THEM. No studying. How many times was MARY mother of Christ mentioned In OUR bible. 19 times. HELL WAS MENTIONED 42 TIMES ALONE IN MATTHEW. How can you say the BIBLE was created by CATHOLICS? TOTAL HERESY. I AM NOT CALLING A HUMAN BEING LET ALONE THE POPE HOLY FATHER!! The pope and priest CANNOT take the place of Christ in forgiving sin. You Catholics have no right to call yourself Christians when your own pope commits offenses in front of Christ. Mary has NO PLACE IN WORSHIP!, CHRIST DESERVES ALL THE CREDIT ALL THE PRAISE. How can you be Catholic and call yourself a Christian? You follow Mary more than you follow our Holy Father(the one and only) JESUS CHRIST. Catholics CANNOT OUT ARGUE CORRECT CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. History is against the Roman Catholic Church. Why is a baphomet(Satanic Statue) sitting right by the Vatican? You Catholics need to do your research. Was Paul a CATHOLIC ?? NO! Was the 12 apostles CATHOLIC? NO? The Romans were busy worshipping all of their satanic Gods. Who killed Jesus? Oh Romans. Who killed the Apostles, oh the Romans. All of your Catholic arguments will never hold up to Holy Doctorine from our HOLY FATHER JESUS CHRIST!! Jesus was mentioned 973 times in the KJV. CATHOLICS ARE NOT CHRISTIANS!!

Catholics are NOT CHRISTIANS!!!

As repulsive or irritating as the Catholic dogma of "real presence/transsubstantiation" may be, despite some slightly different wording, almost all denominations believe in it. Whether Orthodox, Oriental Churches, Protestants or Anglican Churches. In truth, M. Luther never radically abolished the "Holy Mass", only slightly reinterpreted it as regards the real presence of Jesus in the bread and wine, and the doctrine of the Trinity was also retained as the second central dogma! The metaphysical-alechemical concept of "real presence/transubstination" goes back to the medieval scholastics (T. von Aquinas) and the ancient philosophy/theory of ideas of Plato/Aristotle and maybe Hermes Trismegistos?!

Listen to David Pawson. He is a great teacher.

This church never made good on their abuse towards me. Honestly, it seems as if John MacArthur walks with Satan.

God didn't invite Satan to take a whack he set him up because he's a killer

Whole world lies under the power of the evil one Satan, when we don't live under God's will Satan is able to deceive people

God will show himself to not be the problem that's how come Satan can exist

Read the Bible and u will overcome

Read john. That is the answer. Communion i d not a symbol.

You can't even prove Satan exists my friend.

One concept I did not hear you mention, but which I have been taught, is the Holy Spirit. Maybe what I've been taught as a Roman Catholic is different from the Councils of Trent is that the source of power in all the Catholic sacraments is the Holy Spirit. The priest by liturgy calls upon the Holy Spirit which acts through him. So the role of the priest is like a wire carrying the Holy Spirit. There is nothing sacred about a priest. What if a Protestant congregation believed Christ was truly present, in some sense, would the body and blood of Christ be present? Catholics acknowledge 'Wherever two or more are gathered in my name, there I am.' But they seem to acknowledge degrees of presence of Christ, with theirs being highest. Our religious institutions are decaying. Protestants in increasing numbers deny the pre-existence of Christ and the virgin birth. Catholicism seems to have survived because its paganistic elements are alluring. It's tough now for me to go to a Protestant funeral, in the church I grew up for the first 35 years of my life. Everything seems so bare. You are forced to confront the requirement for faith that belies the physics of your senses. Having the Catholic infrastructure of seasons, saints, traditions, and sacramentals is psychologically giving people something to 'hold on to.' It's really tough to be the kind of Protestant I lived the first part of my life. In fact most of the priests whose services I attend remind me of exactly the church I grew up in. They seem to put so much effort in their homilies (sermons).

Revelation 18 does not depict a nation or Nations, but instead it depicts a bride. The church has nothing to do with nations but instead a nation, the Christian Nation, the modern Christian has fallen far from Grace. The modern Christian has done much to bring anyone and everyone into the church. In doing so it has allowed and created a situation in which the inmates run the asylum. This is what the Bible means when it says every bird and spirit of the air and foul creature has taken refuge within her. Her adulteries have reached the heavens is referring to the fact that the church holds a very lenient standard on the Ten commandments now, especially adultery especially under the circumstance of accepting a another man's child. The current church has been reduced to nothing more than a place of wife, swapping and adultery and dating, but even the prospects of dating within the church had been diminished because of the church's stance of acceptance of that behavior in women often telling men to man up and accept a woman with a high body count or a single mother. But the church 's stance on the Ten commandments is not simply fallen because of its stance on adultery the church openly practices, thievery, money, laundering, Coventry and idolatry. But but the church's stance on adultery is the key here because when you understand it stance on adultery you understand why Revelation 18 was talking about the voice of the bridegroom and bride no longer being heard in her again because at this point in time right now marriage is in a steep decline, especially within the church because of her adulteries and her sins.

Thank You Pastor MacArthur as I have just recently found you (May 2023), and have realized I had been under false teaching my entire life. Thank you for your revelation knowledge and understanding as well as your gifted teaching of God’s infallible eternal Word. Extraordinary learning. Glory to God! 🙏🏽✝️❤️‼️

The amount of people who believe this lie hurts me

@danielmaggio7738 *Bible does not teach Roman Mass (sacrificing/offering Jesus on a Roman altar back to God). There is not a single Scripture that supports that claim. So?* *Bible only teaches communion/the Lord's Supper commemorating Christ's death till He returns. No Roman priests Roman popes in weird costumes and funny hats saying hocus pocus to turn the elements into Jesus. No Roman altars or any altars. Apostles and Jesus did not use any altars. They did not have any weird costumes or funny hats. Jesus and APostles did not say hocus pocus to turn anything into JEsus. Also no sacrifice in a bloodied or unbloodied manner. Apostles merely passed around the bread and wine around a table. And they ate.* you said Seriously? The mass is the one true offering of Jesus Christ! It is made present for us in an unbloody manner for our benefit!

Context is important.

Oh shut up

Seriously? The mass is the one true offering of Jesus Christ! It is made present for us in an unbloody manner for our benefit! Sad that you Protestants reject the mercy of God. He does this so that all generations can have connection to his passion. The mass is the same sacrifice at Calvary. No Catholic denies the sufficiency of Christ's death. If anything the protestants limit it because they believe that it cannot be represented and applied in a visible way until the end of time. End of story. Quit lying to spread protestant errors.

Mohammed was foretold ...... when Jesus said false prophets and anti Christs will arrive.....

Praying ❤

Heresy was deliberately misspelt to separate the sheep from the goats .MacArthur is right .

I've been studying sound theology for years... For example eschatology, ecclesiology and soteriology. I love the word I love our Lord Jesus Christ who is on every page... From Genesis to revelation... Thank you again for your servitude John McCarthy we love you...

If you’re exposing the false teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, why not expose the evangelical Churches that that are aligning with the Catholic?!?!

​ @GinaFisher-w3r *We do not need Exact Words in the Bible for the doctrine to be there. Example: we do not have the Exact Words "Trinity or One God three Persons" in the Bible. But trinity doctrine is still in the Bible.* *The word "alone" in Home Alone meant "no other people at home, except me".* *The word "alone" in Scripture Alone meant "taking doctrines from no other source, except Scriptures".* *The word "alone" in Faith Alone meant "salvation is by faith, and not by any other works".* you said Scripture is important to pretty much all Christians, I was looking for the only use scripture part.

​ @GinaFisher-w3r *There are two types of traditions in the Bible: "traditions of men" and "traditions of Jesus and Apostles".* *- Acceptable Traditions (traditions of Jesus and Apostles, 2 Thes **2:15**) - communion, Scriptures ..* *- Unacceptable Traditions (traditions of men, Col 2:8, Mark 7:8 Mat 15, Mat 23) - not from commandments of God. What are commandments of God? Scriptures.* *Scriptures/SS ACCEPTS all traditions of Jesus and Apostles, 2 Thes **2:15**; but REJECTS all traditions of men, Col 2:8, Mark 7:8 Mat 15, Mat 23.* *Bible describes "traditions of men" this way: Mar 7:8, Col 2:8* 1. Any teachings not from the commandment of God or Mosaic Law were called "tradition of men". 2. Philosophies based on principles of the world and not according to Christ/God were called "traditions of men". Mar 7:8 *For laying aside the commandment of God* , you hold the *tradition of men* -the washing of pitchers and cups, and many other such things you do." Col 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the *tradition of men* , according to the basic principles of the world, and *not according to Christ* *95% of RC doctrines were from traditions of men. Not from traditions of Jesus or Apostles. Many Roman Catholic traditions (doctrines) were not based on commandments of God/Jesus or Mosaic Law. And they were not according to God/Jesus. A lot were based on philosophies of the world too. So they should be discarded.* *Examples of that: Jesus did not command making of statues and bowing to them in a Church. These kind of traditions should be discarded. And many more.*

​ @GinaFisher-w3r *Of course Pharisees did not follow Sola Scriptura. That's why Jesus condemned their acts. WHole chapter of Mat 23 condemns the man made traditions of the Pharisees. Versus Mosaic Law (Scriptures).* *Jesus said to the J s: "whatever Pharisees as them to observe (according to Mosaic Law), do. But do not do according to their works (their man made traditions)".* *And what is Mosaic Law? Scriptures. In other words Jesus was asking Js to follow God's Word instead of the man made traditions of the Pharisees. Mat 23 totally proves Sola Scriptura!!* Mat 23:3 Therefore whatever they tell you to observe, that observe and do, but do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do. Mat 23:4 For they bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. Mat 23:5 But all their works they do to be seen by men. They make their phylacteries broad and enlarge the borders of their garments. you said On the other hand, one source of outside scripture doctrine, at least Mosaic Law doctrine, Jesus and his followers accepted, (I think Jesus and his Jewish followers would have been under Mosaic Law at the time) is given in Matthew 23:2-3. That is because Pharisees didn't follow sola scriptura, they had the Oral Torah (Jews still have it) as well as scripture. Also Bible says different sects of Jews had different Bible canons and historically I don't think Pharisees had a dogmatically set canon at the time. Mose's Seat being given to future Jewish men is also a Tradition of that time (didn't come from Apostles) not found in scripture, the scriptures describing any kind of Mose's Seat is vague. Sadducees seem to follow a type of sola scriptura by rejecting oral tradition but Jesus asked his followers to follow Pharisees. There are some verse that the New Testament records that you would think are in the Old Testament or old apocrypha but aren't and are probably old oral Tradition.

A blessed,spirit filled teacher ❤

​ @bridgefin *Still dodging ... So the question remained: Roman religion teaches “submit to Roman pope to be saved”. Do you follow that? Is it biblical?*

​ @bridgefin *Jesus and Apostles took doctrines from Scriptures Only. They must be rebellious and man made according to your fallible opinions. Lol* 31 Verses Found, 31 Matches on the word “Scripture” 21 Verses Found, 21 Matches on the word “Scriptures 127 Verses Found, 132 Matches on the words “it is written” referring to Written Word/Scriptures. you said No, you presumed that we had to dance to your man made and rebellious doctrine of Sola Scriptura. But you can't defend you doctrine so I will not dance to it.

@jonsor-u9m *Yes RCs refused to read the Bible in context. James was addressing 12 tribes of Israel based on James 1:1. Not Gentile Christians.* *Two third of NT says Gentile Christians are saved Not By Works.* Luke 23:43 - the thief at the Cross believed in Jesus and he was in Paradise thereafter. NOT WORKS! John 1:29 - Christ the Lamb of GOD who takes away the sins of the world ... (NOT OUR WORKS) John 3:16 - saved by believing in Jesus. NOT WORKS! Acts 16:30-31 - saved by believing in Jesus. NOT WORKS! Rom 4. Vs 1-2 - justified NOT BY WORKS! Vs 3 - Abraham believed (FAITH) and was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS. Vs 4 - WORKS are debts . Vs 5 - he who DOES NOT WORK is JUSTIFIED . Vs 5 - God justifies the ungodly, Vs 5 - FAITH was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS. Vs 6 - Blessedness Apart from WORKS! Imputation of RIGHTEOUSNESS by FAITH. Vs 8 - imputation of RIGHTEOUSNESS apart from WORKS! Vs 9-10 - Abraham was made RIGHTEOUS BY FAITH BEFORE ANY WORKS! Vs 9-10 - Abraham received seal of RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE FAITH by imputation. NOT WORKS! Vs 11 - Promise to Abraham was through RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE FAITH. Vs 14-15 - Faith is made void by works of the law, works of the Law brings Wrath, Not salvation. Vs 22 - Abraham believed (FAITH) and was accounted as RIGHTEOUSNESS . Vs 22 - RIGHTEOUSNESS imputed on those who believed. Not those who WORKS! Rom 11:6 - IF IT IS WORKS, IT’S NO LONGER GRACE . 2 Cor 5:21 - GOD made Jesus who knew no sin to become sin for us, that we might become the RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD. Gal 2:16 - not justified by WORKS OF THE LAW, BUT BY FAITH IN JESUS. BY WORKS OF THE LAW, NO MAN IS JUSTIFIED! Gal 2:21 - if RIGHTEOUSNESS comes through the law, then Christ died in vain. Gal 3:1-5 - Paul said Christians who started by faith, why end up following WORKS of law (not only Mosaic laws)? Are you made perfect by flesh (WORKS)? Gal 3:1-5 - Did God do miracles by your faith believing or by your WORKS of law? Eph 2:8-9 - saved by grace through faith NOT BY WORKS. Eph 2: 8-9 - salvation is a GIFT. NOT WORKS! 2 Tim 1:9 - saved NOT according to our WORKS. Titus 3:5 - saved NOT BY WORKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. 1 Pet 2:24 - Christ (the Lamb of GOD) bore our sins … (NOT OUR WORKS). you said But Protestants do not bother doing their homework otherwise they would know this. James says - Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. 18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. 19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. Jesus says many will call my name at the end of judgment Jesus will say be gone for I never knew you. If you sin and believe all you have to do is say I believe in Jesus he will save me, you are wrong, your actions speak volumes, and will be judged because talk is cheap.

@jonsor-u9m *Guess who told you that L? Roman religion. Ambrose and Augustine used the word "alone" for Romans 3:28. Old Catholic Bibles before Luther had the word "alone" for Romans 3:28. So Roman religion added "alone" then tells you Luther added "alone".* - Early writings speak of Salvation Not By Works (Faith Alone doctrine) - like Polycarp, Clement of Rome, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria - Old Catholic Bibles spoke of Sola Fede - Nuremberg Bible (1483), “allein durch den glauben” and the Italian Bibles of Geneva (1476) and Italian Bible of Venice (1538) all used Sola Fede in Romans 3:28 - Even Ambrose and Augustine translated Romans 3:28 as Sola Fede. ⭐ St. Augustine's commentary on James 2 Sola Fide. ⭐ And the scripture was fulfilled which says, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. - James 2:23 That Abraham believed God deep in his heart is a matter of faith alone, but that he took his son to sacrifice him . . . is not just a great act of faith but a great work as well. (Sermons 2.9) - Augustine of Hippo And the scripture was fulfilled which says, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. - James 2:23 Abraham is the image of someone who is justified by faith alone, since what he believed was credited to him as righteousness. But he is also approved because of his works, since he offered up his son Isaac on the altar. (Gen 22:10-18) Of course he did not do this work by itself; in doing it, he remained firmly anchored in his faith, believing that through Isaac his seed would be multiplied until it was as numerous as the stars - Oecumenius you said So scripture was ok until Martin Luther came around 1500 years later a failed Priest Monk, altered verses to fit his own narrative adding "faith alone" which is out of context with the verse.

@jonsor-u9m *If not for Christians who wrote Scriptures, RCs would have nothing to compile 300 years later and to brag about it till now. RCs should thank CHristians who gave you Scriptures!* you said without the Catholic Church you would not even have scriptures as Protestants are so keen on citing,

@jonsor-u9m *The Church Christ founded was not even Roman Catholic Church. RCs refused to read the Bible.* you said It still amazes me that "born again Christians aka Evangelists" think they know scripture better than the founding Fathers who passed down not only Scripture as we know it today but also Tradition. The founding Fathers starting with Peter the Rock later turned into the Catholic Church