Відео

you got it 👍

@@HazBofficial is this livonia?

@@HazBofficial Do you experience issues with SOG AI after moving on to the next mission in a FF2 campaign without relaunching the scenario?

@@comradebliin9720 as a matter of fact yes. I'll see if I can get in touch with kingn (ff2) & johnnyboy (Sog) hopefully they can cook a fix.

Yes, the sogpf cDLC needs to be enabled for sogai to work. If you're hesitant on pulling the trigger just wait for a sale. However, it's a meaty dlc and I would be happy to pay the asking price. (IMHO of course)

Believe they are RHS units

Ghost recon camera.

I don't use reshade. The only graphics or lighting mods I have used in the past are recolour and real lighting and weather but none of these were used in either video you have commented on.

@@HazBofficial Ok, thank you 🤙

No, only the Vietnam maps & sog ai require the Vietnam dlc. You'll be fine playing on the other maps as they only have mod dependencies.

Its a balancing act I suppose, A3 felt so rigid and clunky at times and in AR it feels just a wee bit to "loose" they just need to tone it down a small amount and adjust recoil on the move and it should be golden. Vehicles are so much better, agreed. excited to see What they will do with planes and battle tanks. Even more excited to see what the modders can do with the 1st person interactivity

Hey Glenn, Wow what a post! Its interesting you bring the development perspective into the equation and I somewhat agree. I think its very easy to forget we have had the luxury of 3 or 4 iterations of the RV engine? The last of which was for Arma 3's development...its quite remarkable what they did with the already aging RV engine it was like its last moment in the spotlight. More relevant to your post however is when looking back they released A3 piecemeal/episodic. Survive, adapt and win. So yeah, on the face of it I suppose its not BI's first time building foundations for a future, maybe it feels worse because as you say its a new engine and maybe we should cut it some slack...which can be as equally easy AND as hard to say given the persons perspective on the situation. In all honesty I feel how this title has been marketed has been the main contributing factor to the mixed bag we face. When I first covered AR I was alot more "here for the process" but as time grew maybe in a mixture of my naivety, marketing and lets be honest my own "expectations" I've grown to view it more as a full blown title and have judged it as such, as have many others...That part is on BI for slapping 1.0 on it. I think many armaholics would have accepted its EA state ALOT longer considering the monumental task of essentially.... rebuilding Arma? Totally in agreement that this was always going to be difficult and at times rocky but I think there is lessons to be learnt here. better to learn in AR instead of A4? absolutely aslong as they ARE learned.

@@HazBofficial Yeah, from a “business” perspective BI are all over the place on AR. My interpretation of what has happened goes like this. When BI initially released AR, I’m sure they anticipated there would be bugs and issues to deal with, however, I think there were orders of magnitude more issues than they expected. They would’ve needed to have shifted planned resources from developing content, etc, to fixing fundamental connectivity and stability issues, etc. BI presumably don’t have deep pockets just to bring on a whole lot of new staff to deal with these technical issues, I would guess. So this meant that the development timeline went out the window for AR until they could “fix it”. And this took the better part of a year. Naturally this would’ve impacted sales. From a business point of view this would’ve put a lot of pressure on them as they would’ve still been trying to hit projected earnings / profitability expectations that would’ve been set beforehand. So this to me is why we’ve seen a mixed bag of communications / marketing from them. They’re trying to play “catch up” and it’s obvious they’re pushing too hard on that, by going 1.0 too soon. I agree that I was surprised they went to 1.0, because in my book it’s not there yet. Still so many bugs. Some of the recent changes they made to Conflict PVP game mode don’t seem to be consistent with their previous considerations. I think they felt the pressure to try and make it more accessible to noobs, which to me is a problem of not sticking with your design philosophy, which in turn is a sign of business pressure to “just get it out there”.

Can't remember off the top of my head...it's kinda become standard in recent times hasn't it? IF it isn't there then it's something I would love to have in. Can't see it being too much trouble. Arma 3 modders managed it

Pretty sure that’s included

It's there.

In the video, building interior near the window, it is not. @@youcantpredictthat

Hey Chewie, thanks for stopping by, admittedly the video turned more into a discussion of value rather than the question posed in the thumbnail. I may adjust to reflect or maybe not.... Would I recommend this, as an arma title, to others? No ...not yet. I can see you draw immense value from the work bench via your twitter alone....worthy islands isn't it? Workbench hasnt really factored in yet. I appreciate its a powerful suite and would/will be a massive selling point when the platform matures. As for the deluxe stuff...chewie i love arma & BI but i still think its a bit tone deaf to call curtains on early access, slap a 1.0 on it and offer deluxe goodies. Reforger still has some whacky, weird and wonderful bugs and a roadmap that i feel should constitue to a 1.0. Granted noone is forcing new players to buy it. Personally wouod have re branded the deluxe to a armaholic supporter pack or summit. All in my very humble opinion of course....and i consider myself very moderated. 😂

Yes I'm very interested in this myself.

@HazBofficial Though to say it, I can't believe they went to 1.0 without it. Kinda surprised me, actually.

The state of AI in general is worrying to be honest. I get that Reforger is PvP oriented but as a supposed testbench for A4 wouldn't it be tremendously important to test what can be done with AI in Enfusion? Just imagine for example squads working together in a goal oriented framework or proper use of suppresion. Or even tactics reflecting the differences between Russian and American doctrine. I just can't believe they don't work on stuff like that or at least try to.

@youcantpredictthat Yep, and it is roadmapped. The most we can do is wait for BI. I do have faith that they'll come through. I just didn't expect them to go to 1.0 without it. I did hear that arma 3 had its hang ups when it launched, though. And it's turned into a spectacular game.

@@jesseblackwell2884 sure, I'm just kind of worried that we will land on exactly A3's level AI. And we need something much more ambitious. That's probably it. I don't see that there's ambition regarding AI in Bohemia's team and I'm worried they'll push something somewhat playable and say job done.

Hey Jake, I don't currently have a channel but yeah I wouldn't mind talking cinematics. I'm just very elusive because I work in hospitality so a mixed bag of unsociable hours lol. Would like to have a discord channel moving forward but I would feel guilty as I wouldn't have as much time as Id like to interact....but if its something people want, Ill set it up...self policing or bots might be the answer.

@@HazBofficial yeah i get that man, just thought discord would be easiest medium to use, if you want to start a conversion we can just do DM's no discord server needed. Reply as and when you can, would like to do a collab on a project. I know very well how demanding good cinematics can be for arma :)

Good video on Regorger by the way!

I mean I get both sides of the coin here, modder wise I think they (the modders) knew the score here...when it first released in early access. The interest would be huge, a chance to see the inner workings and like you said get mods up and running for Reforger and the arrival of Arma 4. That I get and can't argue with. Intact when it first released BI were very honest and it sounded more of a support us with testing and building upon infusion. The game part as you put it, feels like a slap in the face to some within the community. The more they added the more it changed. It has grown from enthusiast support for the development of Arma 4 to being marketed as a full title. If I had to the video over I think I'd be inclined to cover the "value" argument but as I said in the video...it's proved a most difficult subject. Logic Vs my love of the series. Sorry for the rant...I'm at work so this could be verbal diarrhoea 🤣

ooo Its been a long while, I think everything was set to normal/regular. Im pretty sure There is a parameter that effects assaults. Also top tip, at the top there is a parameter you can change between load/save if you make any changes between sessions (parameter wise) make sure your selecting saving otherwise it'll load either the default settings or the last saved parameters.

@@HazBofficialah i see. Thanks!

In its current state, it's hard to argue. Hence the opening comments. I can see past most of the annoyances and lack of content. Besides the editor and a proper SP mission framework, the one thing that will make or break that "spirit" or feeling of Arma is gonna be how they handle ai.

@@HazBofficial what I would do for EDEN editor in enfusion 🫠🫠🫠

it is ARMA

Performance wise...well put it this way, just like peoples overall opinion in Reforger, it's a mixed bag. It's ran better for me than A3...I'm not sure because it's more GPU bound as my GPU is stronger than my CPU. A3 was deffo more CPU heavy. A3 had the advantage of 3 or 4 iterations if the RV engine. They were right to change, it's dated technologically. Although because there is no competition there's not been much reason to change until now. This was always gonna be a Rocky road...I just think they've been out of touch with the community by slapping deluxe on and calling curtains on its early access period.

Babbleboom, the custom commands can also be used via the vanilla radio system so if you're willing to memorize then it has you covered. Better yet, use voice attack and never worry about a unclean UI ....OR firing them precious neurons to retrieve radio command combinations.